$5.50
FREDERICK THE SECOND
is the story of the remarkable man whose
power and sphere of influence straddled
the worlds of Christendom and of Islam.
The last of the Hohenstaufens, Holy
Roman Emperor and King of Sicily and
Jerusalem, Frederick II was an energetic
and versatile ruler, a man of great ambi
tion in whose lifetime the conflict be
tween Emperor and Pope reached a new
intensity. Excommunicated three times
by the Church, he was an absolute mon
arch whose power, defended in almost
continuous struggle, extended over much
of Germany and Italy as well as the Holy
Land
Frederick was a complex man of cul
tured tastes and licentious manners who
had unusually wide intellectual interests.
At his Sicilian court scholars of all re
ligions were welcomed — Christian, Jew
ish, Mohammedan- He founded the Uni
versity of Naples in 1M4 and was a
patron of the arts and sciences.
The life of this dynamic man is fully
explored in Ernst Kantorowicz' notable
biography, filled with dramatic incident
and absorbing detail, and written with
continued on back flap
92 F9H5k 65-01151*
Kantorovicz
Frederick the Second 1194-1250
FREDERICK THE SECOND
MAY 1965
& 1966
FREDERICK
THE SECOND
1194-1250
BY
ERNST KANTOROWICZ
Authorized English Version by
E. O. LORIMER
With Seven Maps
FREDERICK UNGAR PUBLISHING CO.
NEW YORK
Republished 1957
by arrangement with Constable and Co., Ltd., London
First published 1931
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 57-9408
TO MY FRIEND
WOLDEMAR COUNT UXKULL-GYLLENBAND
IN GRATEFUL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
PLAZA
^50.11.54
CITY C10.I UBKAR>
PREFATORY NOTE
WHEN the Kingdom of Italy, in May 1924, celebrated the
seven-hundredth anniversary of the University of Naples, a
foundation of the Hohenstaufen Frederick II, a wreath might
have been seen on the Emperor's sarcophagus in the Cathedral
of Palermo with this inscription :
SEINEN KAISERN UND HELDEN
DAS GEHEIME DEUTSCHLAND
This is not to imply that the present Life of Frederick II was
begotten of that episode . . . but that wreath may fairly be
taken as a symbol that — not alone in learned circles — enthusiasm
is astir for the great German Rulers of the past : in a day when
Kaisers are no more.
TRANSLATOR'S NOTE
THE English edition of Frederick II differs from the German in the
following points : it has been provided with maps, with a table of
contents, and with page headlines which are not in the original ; also
with a few unobtrusive footnotes [signed Tr.] .
A brief Summary of Sources has been appended, kindly supplied
by the author himself.
Occasionally an allusive passage has been made clearer to an
English reader by the insertion of an author's name or the quotation
of an exact phrase. In a few passages a paragraph has been
compressed or a recondite allusion omitted.
The translator is deeply indebted to F. J. E. Raby, who generously
placed at the disposal of an amateur a scholar's expert knowledge
of medieval literature and religion, and to D. L. R. Lorimer for a
similar service in oriental lore ; to both for constructive criticism
and suggestion. The translator's responsibility for any errors or
mistranslations remains undivided.
E. O. L.
IX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
DEDICATION -- V
PREFATORY NOTE - - yii
TRANSLATOR'S NOTE -------- ix
LIST OF MAPS - - - XIX
CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE xxi
SUMMARY OF SOURCES XXV
i. FREDERICK'S CHILDHOOD 3-35
Prophecies ---- 3
Birth in Jesi, Dec. 26, 1194 5
Character of Henry VI------- 6
Hohenstaufen conception of Empire - 8
Baptism --ir
Death of Henry VI 12
Philip of Swabia ; Otto of Brunswick - - - - 12
Sicilian hatred of Germans - - -*- - - 14
Papal policy towards Sicily - - - - - - 1 6
Constance's Concordat with Rome : death, 1198 - - 17
Innocent : Deliberatio super facto imperil - - - 19
The Sicilian myth ...-.--20
Markward of Anweiler ; Walter of Palear ; Walter of
Brienne .-.-...--22
The Saracens of Sicily - - - - - - - 25
Pisa and Genoa --25
San Germano ------ ---32
Frederick of age, 1208 33
Episcopal elections - - - - - - - - 34
Wedding with Constance of Aragon, 1209 - - - - 34
Death of Aragon knights - - - - - - 35
Revolt of island barons - - - - - - - 35
II. PUER APULIAE 39~74
Innocent III becomes Pope 39
Theories of the Papacy 41
The Priest- State 42
Murder of Philip of Swabia ------ 46
Otto of Brunswick crowned in Rome, 1209 48
Revolt of Apulian nobles 50
Otto deposed 52
Frederick sets out for Rome, March 1212 - - - - 55
Genoa, Cremona, Chur, Constance 56
xi
xii TABLE OF CONTENTS
II. PUER APULIAE — Continued. PAGE
The Children's Crusade - - 59
Alliance with French - - - - - - - 63
Re-elected German King, Dec. 1212 - - - - 63
Crowned in Mainz, 1212 - 63
The regia stirps of the Hohenstaufen 64
The Welf-Waibling feud 65
Guelf and Ghibelline in Italy 68
The Ghibelline spirit 68
Bouvines, 1214 - 69
Golden Bull of Eger 70
Lateran Council, 1216 -- 71
Innocent's death, 1216 71
Frederick's entry into Aix ; coronation 72
Barbarossa's re-interment of Charlemagne, 1165 74
Frederick takes the Cross ------ 74
III. EARLY STATESMANSHIP 77-163
Death of Otto 77
Dawn of national consciousness in Germany - - - 81
Knight and Monk --------82
The Cistercians - - - - - - - - 83
The Templars 87
The Teutonic Order : Hermann of Salza 88
War with Denmark - - - - - - - 91
The Golden Bull of Rimini, 1 226 92
Pope Honorius III -------- 96
King Henry elected King of the Romans - - - 100
Diplomatic victory over the Papacy - - - - -101
Coronation in Rome ; ceremonial - - - - - 107
De resignandis privileges - - - - - -112
The Sicilian barons 113
Diet of Capua - - - - - - . -115
Count of Molise 116
Deportation of people of Celano 117
Remodelling of the Feudal System xi8
Architecture - - - - - - - - -120
Diet of Messina, 1 22 1 - 121
Syracuse ----.__„.. 122
Measures against foreign trade - 123
Creation of Sicilian fleet 124
Saracen war - J28
Lucera I3O
University of Naples - - - - - - -132
Crusading disasters ; San Germane 136
TABLE OF CONTENTS xiii
III. EARLY STATESMANSHIP— continued. PAGE
Death of Constance of Aragon, 1222 - - - - 138
Marriage with Isabella of Jerusalem, 1225 - - - 139
Birth of Conrad ---_.»._ I^o
Berard of Palermo -----,_. I43
Lombard League - - - - . . _ -147
Feud of Cremona and Milan - - - - - - 148
Franciscans and Dominicans - - - - . -154
Diet of Cremona prevented by Lombards, 1226 - - 156
Leonardo of Pisa ----._.„ x eg
St. Francis rgo
Death of Honorius III X62
Gregory IX - - - - . . . _ - 163
IV. THE CRUSADE 167-221
Rendezvous in Brindisi, 1227 X68
Pla8ue 169
Frederick falls ill and turns back !7o
Hostility of Gregory IX I7l
Excommunication -----.._ IyI
Gregory's entente with Lombards I7l
Loyalty of Rome to Frederick I74
Frederick's first manifesto - - - _ . ^j^
Frederick sails for East, June 1228 I76
Gregory attacks Sicily I77
Frederick recovers Cyprus - - - - . -179
Lands at Acre - - - _ . > _ -182
Treaty with al Kamil ; ro-year truce - - - - 187
Saracen chivalry - - - - - _ . -189
Treachery of Templars Z89
Influence of East on Frederick i^o
Entry into Jerusalem, March 17, 1229 - - - 197
Self- Coronation, March 18- - - - - -199
Jerusalem manifesto --.--_« 2oo
Last scenes in Palestine ---.... 3O^
Frederick lands at Brindisi, June 1229 - 206
Exeunt papal troops from Sicily 207
Attitude of Gregory IX ; truce 2O8
Peace of Ceperano -------- 209
V. TYRANT OF SICILY 215-368
Influence of Eastern success - - - - - -215
Affection for Sicily -------- 220
Three Emperor models ------ 232
b
xiv TABLE OF CONTENTS
V. TYRANT OF SICILY — continued. PAG«
Constitutions of Melfi, 1231 --*.-.- 223
Expectation of Golden Age and End of World - 224
Augustales minted - - - - - . . -225
Frederick's birthday a public holiday - 227
I
Liber Augustalis - - - - - - - -228
Cult of Justitia 229
Invocation of imperial name - - - - - -239
" Crown Prosecution " 240
Theory of the " Fall " 241
Necessitas 245
Dante's de Monarckia ----..» 247
The Divine Comedy - - - - - . -259
II
Pope Gregory and the Liber Augustalis - - - 261
Relation of Church and State - - - - - -262
Zeal against heretics --.--.. 263
Muslims and Jews - - - - - - . -267
State organisation : justiciars, notaries - - - - 271
Conditions of service ---_-_,_ 273
Treatment of suspects ----.._ 277
Rebellious towns -----_.„ 28o
Augusta 280
Uniformity and simplification of government - - - 281
Town-creation ; frontier protection - - - - - 281
Monopolies ------,..._ 282
Customs and revenue -.--.-_ 283
Weights and measures - - - - - » -284
Fairs and markets -----.._ 285
The Emperor as trader ---_.__ 287
Taxation ------... 287
Commercial agreements 288
Overseas consuls and embassies - - - . - 289
A Sicilian nation -----._, 290
Marriage ordinances 291
III
Triumph of lay culture 293
Petrus de Vinea (Piero della Vigna) 299
Frederick's public speaking 3o7
Frederick amongst intimates 3O7
Youthfulness of Sicilian court 3O8
Frederick's retainers ; menagerie 3IO
TABLE OF CONTENTS xv
V. TYRANT OF SICILY— Continued. JACK
Famous families in his service - - - - - -313
Thomas Aquinas - - - - . . . -313
Valetti imperatoris - - - - . - _ -314
Frederick's sons - - - - - . _ -318
Chivalry at court -----_,. ^21
Foggia : banquets, revelry 323
Michael Scot --------- 323
Sicilian poetry ; use of vernacular - - - - 327
Intellectual thought at court 328
Learning at court - - - - - - . -334
Astronomy and Astrology --_--„ 342
Hebrew scholars - - - - - - - -343
Spirit of Enquiry ; Ibn Sabin of Ceuta - 347
Research and experiment ------ 349
De arte venandi cum avibus - - - - - -359
The art of seeing " things that are, as they are " 360
Frederick's personal appearance - 365
VI. GERMAN EMPEROR 371-438
Pope and Emperor in harmony - - - - 371
Diet of Ravenna, 1231- - - - - - - 372
King Henry ; Diet of Worms, 1231 373
Diet of Friuli, 1232 .---... 374
Growing autonomy of German Princes - 379
Theory of German Empire - - - - - -385
Burgundy -------._ 388
Loss of Cyprus -------- 389
Frederick aids Pope against Romans - - - 389
Ideal relation of Empire and Papacy - - - 390
Inquisition - - - - - - - - -393
The Great Halleluja 397
Dominicans and Franciscans - - - - - -397
Joachim of Flora : Three Ages of the world - 398
John of Vicenza -------- 398
Conrad of Marburg ------- 400
King Henry's rebellion and treason ----- 402
Fate of Henry -------- 405
Frederick marries Isabella of England - 407
Diet and Landpeace of Mainz ------ 409
Use of German for imperial proclamation - - 411
End of Welf-Waibling feud 412
Jew ritual murder case - - - - - - -413
War with Lombardy - - - - - - -416
xvi TABLE OF CONTENTS
VI. GERMAN EMPEROR — continued. PAGE
Pope's manoeuvres - - - - - - - -417
Re-burial of St. Elizabeth, 1236, at Marburg - 419
" Execution of Justice " against Lombardy - - 421
Appeal to all Christian monarchs ----- 422
Appeal to Romans -------- 425
Art of war in Middle Ages ------ 427
Frederick of Babenberg u the Quarrelsome " - - - 428
Arrogance of Gregory IX - - - - - -429
" Donation of Constantine " - - - - - - 429
Capture of Vicenza - - - - - - - -431
Diet of Vicenza -------- 432
Conrad, King of the Romans - - - - - -433
Cortenuova, 1237 -------- 435
The " Triumph " in Cremona 438
VII. CAESAR AND ROME 441-516
The magic of Rome ------- 441
Renovatio imperii -------- 443
Identification with Caesar ------ 446
Spolia opima from Cortenuova ----- 448
Lust for personal glorification ------ 450
Frederick's wooing of the Romans - - - - 451
Cardinals and Pope ------- 45*7
Progress in Lombardy - - - - - - -459
Diets of Pavia and Turin, 1238 ----- 460
Siege of Brescia ; Calamandrinus ----- 465
Coalition against Frederick ------ 466
Enzio --------.„ 469
Imperial Court at Padua ------- 470
Frederick's appeal to the Cardinals - - - - 471
Frederick excommunicated - - - - - 472
Death of Hermann of Salza - - - - - -473
Reorganisation and defence of Sicily - 477
Destruction of Benevento, 1241 ----- 483
Reorganisation of Italy - - - - - - -486
War of manifestos and propaganda ----- 495
Brother Elias --------- 509
Brother Jordan and the Pope - - - - - -510
Christmas in Pisa - - - - - - - -511
Frederick invaded the Papal States - - - - -511
Letter to Jesi - - - - - - - - -512
At the gates of Rome - - - - - - -513
Gregory turns the multitude 516
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
VIII. DOMINUS MUNDI 5IQ~<>QQ
Cult of the Emperor .51
The sacratissimum ministerium S26
Outburst of Sicilian art S2g
Capuan Gate ---.„_
Nicholas of Pisa - - - 535
St. Francis and " Gothic " painting 536
Diet in Foggia, 1240 6
Inefficacy of papal ban
Princes' effort to mediate 5-3
Surrender of Ravenna
Resistance of Fae'nza 5
Cost of prolonged operations 5-4I
Issue of leather coins 54I
Hostilities against Venice 542
Gregory's General Council 543
Frederick's counter-measures 544
Gregory's pact with Genoa 544
Fall of Fa&iza, April 14, 1241 546
Destruction of Benevento -47
Victory at sea, 1241 ; capture of 100 prelates - - - 549
Mongol threat ----.... 5-x
Battle of Liegnitz, 1241 ^
Pope hinders Crusade - - - . _ . _ --^
Muslims retake Jerusalem, Nov. 1240 - - - - 557
Frederick negotiates recovery of Jerusalem - - - 557
Advance on Rome ; death of Pope Gregory - - - 558
Status of Empire in Europe - - - _ - 561
Relations between Frederick and brother kings - - - 562
Saint Louis -..„ 56g
Stirps caesarea • deification of the Hohenstaufens - - 572
Conclave of Terror, 1241 574
Innocent IV elected Pope 5^3
Defection of Viterbo -----.. 584
Treachery of Cardinal Rainer 585
Provisional peace, 1244 ; breaks down - - - - 587
Flight of Innocent IV 588
Ly°ns 589
Diet of Verona ._ -pr
Rainer's hostile propaganda $gz
Council of Lyons ------.. 507
Thaddeus of Suessa ^
Deposition of Frederick II 8
xviii TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
IX. ANTICHRIST 603-689
Dual interpretation of Frederick's life «... 609
Frederick's posterity 612
Satellite giants : Eccelino , Guido of Sessa, Hubert Pallavicini 612
" Labour of Love ": to purge the Church - - - 615
Reform manifestos - - - - - - - -617
Pope's counter-activities 618
Increasing savagery of Frederick - 625
Lure of the East 627
Conspiracy of intimates, 1246 632
Distrust of subordinates - - 633
Punishment of conspirators 634
Complicity of Pope - - - - - - - -635
Henry Raspe 636
Italy partitioned amongst the Hohenstaufen - 637
March on Germany ; threat to Lyons - - - - 641
Defection of Parma ....... 643
" The Cardinal" 646
Siege of Parma 648
Saracens as executioners 652
Victoria 654
Defeat before Parma 656
Money shortage -------- 5 JJQ
German knights in Italy - - - -• - . - 661
German influence on Renaissance* art 662
Renewed threat to Lyons 663
Fall of Piero della Vigna » 664
Attempt to poison Frederick 656
Piero della Vigna's suicide 667
Enzio taken prisoner ----... 6y0
Fate of King Conrad 673
Manfred's rise and fall 5^
Conradin's coronation -----.. fa*
Tagliacozzo ; Conradin's execution 676
Death of Enzio fa*
Curse on the Hohenstaufen 5^8
Parma avenged 680
Death of Frederick, December 13, 1250 - 683
Burial at Palermo 53,
The Frederick myth 6g.
INDEX -
LIST OF MAPS
1. THE TWO SICILIES (circa 1230) inside back cover
2. NORTH ITALY AND TRANSALPINE EUROPE (circa 1230)
inside back cover
3. THE; BATTLE OF BOUVINES 69
4. THE BIRTH OF PRUSSIA ------ 92
5. THE FIFTH CRUSADE 1 80
6. CORTENUOVA 436
7. THE MONGOL PERIL 552
XIX
CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE
1 190. Death of Barbarossa
Emperor Henry VI
1194. December 26th. Frederick II born in Jesi
1 197. September 28th. Death of Henry VI
1198. Innocent III becomes Pope
Welf-Hohenstaufen rivalries
1198. May. Frederick II crowned in Palermo as King of
Sicily
1198. November 28th. Death of the Empress Constance
Innocent III Regent of Sicily and Guardian of
Frederick II
1 20 1. Markward of Anweiler ruling in Palermo
1204. Conquest of Constantinople by the Crusaders
1208, June 2ist, Murder of King Philip of Swabia
December 26th. Frederick II comes of age
1209. Marriage with Constance of Aragon
Otto IV crowned Emperor in Rome
I2IO-H. Otto IV in the Kingdom of Sicily
121 1. Frederick II elected German Emperor
1 212. Arrival in Constance of the Puer Apuliae
1215. Coronation in Aix
Takes the Cross
Fourth Lateran Council
1216. July i6th. Pope Innocent III dies at Perugia
Honorius III as Pope
1218. Death of Otto IV
1220. Diet at Frankfurt
Henry (VII) elected King of the Romans
Frederick crowned Emperor in Rome
Diet of Capua
1221-23. Subjugation of Sicily
1224. Foundation of the University of Naples
1225. Crusade Negotiations with the Curia
Treaty of San Germane
Marriage with Isabella of Jerusalem
xxii CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE
1226. Diet of Cremona
Renewal of the League of Lombardy
Order of Teutonic Knights
Death of Francis of Assisi
1227. Death of Honorius
Pope Gregory IX
Preparations for Crusade
Plague in Brindisi
First Excommunication of Frederick II
1229. March. Coronation in Jerusalem
Return to Sicily
Rout of Papal Troops
1230. Peace with the Curia
1231. Constitutions of Melfi
Augustales
Development of the Sicilian Monarchy
1232. Visit to Venice
Diet of Friuli
King Henry VII
1233. Penance Movement in Italy
1235. King Henry's Rebellion
Frederick's March to Germany
Court of Justice at Worms
Marriage with Isabella of England
Diet of Mainz
1236. Obsequies of St. Elizabeth
First Lombard Campaign
Conquest of Vicenza
Campaign against Austria
Winter Camp at Vienna
Conrad IV elected King of the Romans
1237. Second Lombard Campaign
Cortenuova
Triumph in Cremona and Rome
1238. Third Lombard Campaign
Siege of Brescia
Marriage of Enzio
1239. Camp at Padua
Excommunication
Fourth Lombard Campaign
Reorganisation of Sicily
Foundation of the Italian State
Invasion of the Patrimonium
CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE xxiii
1240. March on Rome
Return to Sicily
Campaign in the Romagna
Capture of Ravenna
Siege of Faenza
1241. Capture of Faenza
Victory at Sea
Capture of the Prelates
Tartar Invasion of Silesia
New Campaign against Rome
Death of Gregory IX
1241-43. Papal Chair vacant
1243. Innocent IV as Pope
Negotiations for Peace
Defection of Viterbo
1244* Peace with the Curia
Flight of Pope to Lyons
1245. Council of Lyons
Deposition of Frederick II
1246. Camp at Grosseto
Conspiracy
Campaign in the Kingdom of Sicily
Henry Raspe Anti-King in Germany
1247. Re-organisation of Italian State
March on Lyons
Defection of Parma
Rise of Guelf Party in Italy
Parma besieged
Building of Victoria
1248. Defeat of Parma
1249. Arrest of Piero della Vigna
Doctor's attempt to poison Frederick
King Enzio taken Prisoner
1249-50. Crusade of Saint Louis
1250. December I3th. Death of Frederick II at Florentine
1265. May 8th. Birth of Dante
1266. King Manfred killed at Benevento
1268. Execution of Conradin
1272. Death of King Enzio
SUMMARY OF SOURCES
(The actual documents and references to the sources on which this book is
based form a second volume of the German edition, which has just been
published by Georg Bondi, Berlin. These pieces justificative* will no doubt
be consulted in the original tongues by serious students of the subject.
In the meantime Professor Kantorowicz has kindly written for the English
edition the following note as a guide to the general reader.)
THE most important sources for the history of Frederick II are the
Regesta imperil ', vol. v : Die Regesten des Kaiserreichs unter PhiUpp,
Otto IV, Friedrich II, Heinrich (VII), Conrad IV, Heinrich Raspe,
WiUielm und Richard, 1198-1272, edited by Boehmer, Ficker and
Winkelmann (Innsbruck, 1881-1901). Letters and documents have
been collected by Huillard-Bre'holles in Historia diplomatica
Friderici secundi (Paris, 1852-61). Constitutional documents, edicts,
etc., relating to the Empire are to be found in the Monumenta Ger-
maniae Historica : Constitutiones et acta publica imperatorum et
regum, Tom. II (1198-1272), ed. L. Weiland (Hanover, 1896). The
Letters of Petrus de Vinea were last edited by Iselin (Basle, 1740) ;
there is no more modern edition. Further documents and letters
will be found in J. F. Boehmer's Acta imperil selecta (Innsbruck,
jSyo) ; Julius Ficker 's Forschungen zur Reichs- und Rechtsgeschichte
Italians (Innsbruck, 1874) ; E. Winkelmann's Acta imperil inedita
saeculi XIII (Innsbruck, 1880-85) ; and also in Italian and German
periodicals, especially in Quellen und Forschungen aus italienischen
Archiven und Bibliotheken, published by the Preussische Histo-
rische Institut in Rome (Rome, 1898 ff.). Karl Hampe has printed
a large number of important letters ; the publications in which these
have appeared are enumerated in Quellen und Forschungen aus
italienischen Archiven, etc., vol. xx, p. 40.
The authoritative edition of the Emperor's Sicilian laws is that of
C. Carcani : Constitutiones regum regni utriusque Siciliae, mandante
Friderico II imperatore (Naples, 1786) ; the Greek translation and
the fragment of the Register of 1239-40 will be found in the same
place. The edition by Antonius Cervonius : Constitutionum regni
Siciliarum libri III (Naples, 1773) is also useful on account of con
taining the Glosses. The Laws in chronological order will be found
in Huillard-Bre'holles, op. cit., vol. iv, pp. i fT. The courtiers' letters
xxvi SUMMARY OF SOURCES
are in an appendix to Huillard-Breholles : Vie et correspondance de
Pierre de la Vigne {Paris, 1865).
The number of chronicles and annals relating to the period of
Frederick II is extraordinarily large ; an excellent summary of them
will be found in the Regesta imperil, vol. v, 9, pp. Ixxxvii if. The
important biography of Frederick II by Bishop Mainardinus of
Imola has unfortunately perished ; it has been as far as possible
reconstructed from surviving fragments by F. Gueterbock in
Neues Archiv, vol. xxx (1905), pp. 35-83. The most outstanding
Italian chroniclers are: Richard of San Germano, edited by A.
Gaudenzi in Monumenti storici, serie prima : Cronache (Naples,
1888) ; the Guelf and Ghibelline Annals of Piacenza in the Monum.
Germ. Histor. : Scriptores, vol. xviii, a volume which also contains
the important Annales Januenses \ the Chronicle of Rolandin of
Padua, ibid., vol. xix, and the Chronicle of Fra Salimbene of Parma,
ibid., vol. xxxii. The most important German chroniclers are :
Burchardi Praepositi Urspergensis Chronicon, ed. Holder Egger and
B. v. Simson in Scriptores rerum Germanicarwn (Hanover, 1916),
and the Chronica regia Coloniensis, ed. G. Waitz, in Scriptores rerum
Germanicarum (Hanover, 1880). A further main source is Roger of
Wendover, Flores historiarum, ed. Coxe (London, 1841), and Matthew
Paris, Historia maior, ed. Luard (London, 1872 ff.). Both of these
are Englishmen. The Arabic sources have been edited and trans
lated into Italian by Michele Amari, Bibliotheca arabo-sicula (Turin-
Rome, 1880 if.). The most important of the papal letters have been
printed in Monum. Germ. Histor. : Epistolae saeculi XIII e regestis
pontificum Romanorum selectae, ed. C. Rodenberg (Berlin, 1883 if.).
Among secondary authorities Schirrmacher's Kaiser Friedrich der
Zzoeite (Gottingen, 1859-65) is superseded by E. Winkelmann :
Jahrbiicher der deutschen Geschichte, Philipp von Schwaben und Otto
von Braunschweig, 2 vols. (Leipzig, 1873-78), and Kaiser Friedrich II,
2 vols. (Leipzig, 1889-97), which, however, only extends to the year
1233. A concise and more recent account is given by Karl Hampe's
Deutsche Kaisergeschichte in der Zeit der Salier und Staufer. Other
attempts to give a complete portrait are : Wolfram von den Steinen's
Das Kaisertum Friedrichs II nach den Anschauungen seiner Staats-
briefe (Berlin-Leipzig, 1922) ; Antonio de Stefano : Uidea imperiale
di Federico II (Florence, 1927) ; further, Otto Vehse : Die amtliche
Propaganda in der Staatskunst Kaiser Friedrichs II (Munich, 1929).
A number of single questions relating to the history of the Emperor
have been handled in smaller monographs in the Heidelberger Abhand-
lungen zur mittleren und neueren Geschichte (Heidelberg) for the
medieval section of which Karl Hampe is the editor. The two
following books are indispensable for a study of the culture and
intellectual life at the court of Frederick II : Hans Niese's Zur
SUMMARY OF SOURCES xxvii
Geschichte des geistigen Lebens am Hofe Kaiser Friedrichs //, Histo-
rische Zeitschrift, vol. 108 (1912), pp. 437 ff., and the supremely
excellent researches of Charles Homer Haskins, the bulk of which
are collected in his Studies in the History of Medieval Science
(Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.), 1924.
E. K.
I. FREDERICK'S CHILDHOOD
Prophecies Birth in Jesi, Dec. 26, 1194 Character
of Henry VI Hohenstaufen conception of Empire
Baptism Death of Henry VI Philip of Swabia ;
Otto of Brunswick Sicilian hatred of Germans
Papal policy towards Sicily Constance's Concordat
with Rome ; death, 1198 Innocent : Deliberatio super
facto imperii The Sicilian myth Markward of
Anweiler ; Walter of Palear ; Walter of Brienne The
Saracens of Sicily Pisa and Genoa San Germano
Frederick of age, 1208 Episcopal elections
Wedding with Constance of Aragon, 1209 Death of
Aragon knights Revolt of island barons
I. FREDERICK'S CHILDHOOD
OF all the prophecies in verse foretelling a future Saviour to
which the West has given birth, Vergil's Fourth Eclogue is the
most famous. Before celebrating in his mighty epic the future
of Imperial Rome, the poet painted in this relatively short poem
his picture of the future ruler of the world. He lent him all
the attributes of the Messiah : as befits a son of the Gods he
shall greet Life with a smile, he shall bring peace on earth and
the Age of Gold, and shall evoke once more the kingdom of
Apollo. The Middle Ages never paused to reflect that Vergil's
promises might seem to be fulfilled in Augustus, Emperor of
Peace, the poet's patron. To that Christian age such prophetic
verses could bear one interpretation only — a miraculous fore
telling of Christ's advent. That they foretold a " Ruler " was
no deterrent, for men were wont to praise Christ as " King of
the World " and " Emperor of All," and to represent him
graphically, in a mandorla, throned on clouds, bearing the globe
and law book in his hand and on his head the diadem : the
stern Ruler of the Cosmos. To the pious mind it was but one
miracle the more, that the heathen Vergil, like the prophets of
the Ancient Covenant, had known and told the coming of the
Redeemer. Thus this short poem, with its miraculous fore
knowledge, earned for Vergil the admiration and reverence of
the medieval world. This Vergilian prophecy provided the
inspiration both in manner and matter for the song in which the
Campanian poet, Peter of Eboli, extravagantly hailed the birth
of Henry VFs only son. It is by no means without significance
that Vergil thus stands by the cradle of the last and greatest
Christian Emperor of the German Roman Imperium.
The learned Peter of Eboli was not the only poet and sooth
sayer who offered his prophetic wares to the new-born child on
the day following the Christmas of 1194. Godfrey of Viterbo,
the tutor of Henry VI, hailed the boy as the future Saviour
foretold of prophets, the time-fulfilling Caesar. Even before
3
4 THE EMPRESS CONSTANCE i
the birth Godfrey had in sibylline speech informed his master
that the coming son was destined to prove the long-awaited
King of all the World, who should unite East and West as the
Tiburtine sibyl had foretold. And later the story ran that
East and West had cried aloud with joy at the birth of the
imperial heir. Meanwhile other and less flattering predictions
gained currency which had likewise accompanied the birth of
the youngest Hohenstaufen. The Breton wizard Merlin was
said to have spoken of the child's " wondrous and unhoped for
birth " and in dark mysterious words to have hinted at disaster.
The child would be a lamb, to be torn in pieces, but not to be
devoured ; he was to be a raging lion too amongst his own.
The Calabrian Cistercian, the Abbot Joachim of Flora, the
" Fore-runner " of St. Francis, was swift to recognise *n the
new-born child the, future Scourge of the World, the Anti-
Christ who was to bring confusion in his train. The Abbot,
indeed, full of prophetic fire, was said to have informed the
Emperor betimes that the Empress — overlain by a demon —
was pregnant, without yet knowing of her pregnancy. The
Empress too had had a dream and it had been revealed to her
that she was to bear the fiery brand, the torch of Italy.
Constance obsessed the imagination of her contemporaries
as few empresses have done. The strangely-secluded girlhood
of the heiress of Sicily, posthumous daughter of the gifted
Norman king and state-maker, Roger II, the great blond-
bearded Viking : her belated marriage, when she was already
over thirty, with Barbarossa's younger son, her junior by ten
years : her nine years of childlessness : the unexpected con
ception by the ageing woman : all this was — or seemed —
mysterious enough to the people of her time to furnish ample
material for legend. According to current rumour Constance's
mother, Beatrice, daughter of Count Gunther of Rethel, had
been a prey to evil dreams when, after the death of King Roger,
she was brought to bed of the future Empress. And the
augurs of the half-oriental Norman court declared that Con
stance would bring dire ruin on her fatherland. To avert this
evil fate, no doubt, Constance was at once doomed to be a
1 194 FREDERICK'S BIRTH 5
nun. The fact that the princess actually spent long periods
in various nunneries in Palermo may well have strengthened
such a report. The story further ran that Constance had been
most unwilling to marry at all, and this coloured Dante's
conception of her : because she left her " pleasant cloister's
pale " under pressure and against her will, he gave the Empress
a place in Paradise. The tale that Constance had taken the
veil was widely believed, and later deliberately circulated by
the Guelfs out of malice towards her son. The similar super
stition of a later day foretold that a nun should be the mother
of Anti-Christ. Meantime this first and only pregnancy of the
forty-year old empress gave rise to another cycle of legend.
It became the fashion to represent Constance as being consider
ably older than she was, in order to approximate the miracle of
this belated conception to Bible precedent, and she is tradition
ally depicted as a wrinkled old woman. The rumour that the
child was supposititious was bound to follow, and it was given
out that he was in reality the son of a butcher. Shrewd
woman that she was, Constance had taken measures to forestall
such gossip : she had had a tent erected in the open market
place, and there in the sight of all she had borne her son and
proudly displayed her well-filled breasts — so the counter-
rumour ran.
Not in Palermo, but in Jesi, a small town dating from Roman
times, in the March near Ancona, Constance brought her son to
birth. After he was Emperor, Frederick sang the praises of
his birthplace in a remarkable document. He called Jesi his
Bethlehem, and the Divine Mother who bore him he placed
on the same plane as the Mother of our Lord. Now the Ancona
neighbourhood with its landscapes belongs to the most sacred
regions of Renaissance Italy. As soon as the Italian people
awoke to self-consciousness it recognised this as a sancta regio
and consecrated it as such. From 1294 — a hundred years after
the birth of the Staufen boy — the Virgin's house from Nazareth
stood in the Ancona Marches, and Loreto, where it eventually
came to rest, became one of the most famous places of pilgrimage
in Italy. So it need cause no surprise that the March — the
home moreover of Raphael — supplies the actual landscape
basis (so far as a mythical landscape has a real prototype) for
6 HENRY VI i
innumerable pictures of the Madonna playing with the Holy
Child.
These sunlit scenes played no part in the actual childhood of
the boy. A few months after his birth Constance had the
" blessed son " — to whom for the moment she gave the name
of Constantine — removed to Foligno near Assisi and placed in
the care of the Duchess of Spoleto, while the Empress herself
hastened back to her Sicilian kingdom. She had only stayed
in Jesi for her confinement, while the Emperor Henry travelled
south to repress a Sicilian insurrection. Thii he accomplished
with severity and bloodshed, and at last, after years of toil and
fighting, he took possession of the hereditary country of his
consort. All that Barbarossa had once dreamed, and had
hoped to achieve through the Sicilian marriage of his son : to
checkmate the exasperating Normans who always sided with
the enemies of the Empire ; to secure in the extreme south a
firm fulcrum for the Empire of the Hohenstaufen, corresponding
to their stronghold north of the Alps, and from these two bases
— independent of the favour or disfavour of the German
princes — to supervise and hold in check the Patrimonium
between, and the ever-restive Italy : all this had reached
fulfilment one day before the heir to this imperial power was
born. Escorted by Saracen trumpeters, Henry with unexampled
pomp entered as victor into the conquered city of Palermo, the
terrified populace falling on their knees as he rode by, and on
Christmas Day 1194 he was crowned King of Sicily in the
cathedral of the capital. He was soon able to announce in one
and the same letter both the victorious outcome of his cam
paigns and the birth of his son and heir. The assurance of the
succession gave full value to the conquest of the southern
kingdom, a hereditary not an elective monarchy, and to the
other great achievements of the indefatigable Emperor.
Henry's rule over the Roman Empire lasted but six years.
But this short space sufficed him to crush the world into the
dust before his throne. If, like his son, he had possessed the
skill to read the stars, and had learned from them how short a
span was accorded for the fulfilment of his gigantic task, he
could scarcely have economised his time more drastically than
he did without this foreknowledge. He recognised no values
HENRY'S AMBITIONS 7
but the concrete and the practical ; he allowed no scruple to
stem his progress ; when state policy was at stake all con
ventions were but will-o'-the-wisps. The sober statesmanlike
genius that reveals itself in this he shared with the other
Hohenstaufens, but he lacked many another quality of that
favoured house : he had nothing of the genial bonhomie of
his family, nothing of their gracious exterior. His body was
gaunt and frail, his sombre countenance, dominated by the
mighty brow, was unvaryingly stern. His face was pale, his
beard was scant. No man saw him laugh. His personality
completely lacked the amiability and compelling charm of
Barbarossa. He had a gloomy autocratic way with him ; in
later days he might almost have been of stone. His policy was
ambitious and all-embracing, but hard and uninspired. Hard
ness was indeed the keynote of his being, a hardness as of
granite, and with it a reserve rare in a German. Add to this
a mighty will, a passion immensely strong but cold as ice,
an amazing shrewdness and political acumen. There was a
remarkable absence of youthfulness in all these qualities, and
indeed it is easy to forget that with his thirty-second year
Henry's career had run its course.
In addition to the Empire itself, Barbarossa had bequeathed
to his son the sum total of imperial claims and demands which
were his by Roman Law : the theory that the whole circuit of
the world was by right under the tutelage of the Roman Im-
perator. And the task now fell to Henry to make good these
claims. He had none of Barbarossa's devouring fire or infec
tious enthusiasm and none of his ingenuous naivete — Barbarossa
for instance had once commanded the Sultans to place their
lands under his rule as heir of the Augusti, because these
eastern territories had of old been conquered by the generals
of his Caesar ancestors. Henry possessed, however, one quality
most essentially Roman : a boundless, sober common sense.
He was skilful in turning to account for his own success as a
world-conqueror the enthusiasm kindled by his father. " As
the sun outshines in greatness and in glory all the massed stars
of Heaven, so the Roman Empire is lofty above the other
kingdoms of the world. Sole overlordship belonged of yore to
the Roman Empire, and as the stars receive their light from the
8 CONCEPTION OF EMPIRE i
sun, so do the kings receive from the Emperor the right to rule."
Thus wrote not long afterwards the Rhenish Cistercian,
Caesarius of Heisterbach, and many non-Germans would have
agreed with him. The English John of Salisbury, writing in
an almost humanistic atmosphere, dubbed them " petty kings,"
and again Huguccio of Pisa, with his mental background of
Roman law, taught : " there be many provinces in the Roman
Empire, with many kings, but only one Emperor, their suzerain."
Such is the familiar conception of the imperial power held
by the house of Hohenstaufen. As Walther von der Vogel-
weide phrased it later, " the minor kings surround thee."
The imperial claim could not always be made good in the form
of an immediate, absolute autocracy, but with the aid of feudal
law it could be realised mediately. Within a few years the
West, and not the West alone, had in fact learned to recognise
in Henry VI the highest feudal lord. Even before the death of
Barbarossa Henry had laid claim to Denmark and the Polish
East ; England had become a tributary vassal state — the capture
of Richard Coeur de Lion was a master stroke of Henry's
calculating statesmanship. He claimed further, through
Coeur de Lion, to be acknowledged as overlord by Philip
Augustus of France : for the great English possessions, from
Normandy to the borders of Navarre , were French fiefs . France
was to be compelled to take the oath of fealty, and Richard of
England was commissioned, as any subordinate general might
have been, to make war on France in the Emperor's name, and
to conclude peace only with the Emperor's permission. The
Emperor's pretensions extended to the kingdom of Burgundy,
which, since Barbarossa's marriage to Beatrice, had once more
reverted to the Empire. He even claimed Castile and asserted
rights in Aragon which he looked to the Genoese to uphold for
him. Italy as a whole was in his hand. The Italian islands
belonged to the Empire, the Lombard states scarcely ventured to
resist, and the Pope — in no wise a match for the imperial power
— was restricted to a patch of the Campagna : " where none
the less men feared the Emperor rather than the Priest." The
entire Patrimonium, Spoleto, the March, Tuscany, were in his
possession. Rome accepted her Prefect from the Emperor's
hand, and the whole side of the city lying on the right bank of
EXTENT OF HENRY'S POWER 9
the Tiber was incorporated in Tuscany. Once Sicily had been
conquered, therefore — an undertaking that for many years
taxed all the Emperor's strength — the whole of Italy was united
under a single all-powerful monarch.
With the possession of Sicily a new world opened to Henry :
from the pillars of Hercules to the Hellespont the whole basin
of the Mediterranean lay within the radius of his power. He
conceived himself the heir of the Normans, not alone of the
royal citadel, of Palermo and of the royal dignities, but also
of their rights and claims. Since the days of Roger II the
Normans had styled themselves " Kings of Africa," and the
Muslim princes, from Morocco to Tripoli, were now compelled
to render to the German Emperor — the new Lord of Sicily —
the tribute heretofore paid to their Norman masters. The
Sultan of the Almohades did not hesitate long about paying
tribute, for he saw his Balearic islands threatened after the
fall of Sicily. Henry VI further considered himself the heir
of the campaigns of Robert Guiscard and his followers against
the Eastern Empire. The vivid German picture of one uni
versal Roman World would have been far from realisation if
Henry had tolerated the existence of the Greek Emperor by
his side : the ring round the Mediterranean would not have
been complete without Byzantium. Henry VI was able to
back his claims by various legal titles, and where these failed
the fear of his power was by itself enough to make the powerless
Greeks speedily complacent. As heir of the Normans he
demanded all the territory from Epidaurus to Thessalonica,
and through his ambassador he inexorably exacted tribute,
followers, and ships from the anaemic usurper, Alexius III.
" As if he were Lord of Lords and King of Kings " he con
ducted his business with Byzantium. To raise the tribute-
money Alexius was driven to institute a " German Tax/' and
he did not shrink even from opening up the imperial tombs —
including that of the great Constantine — and plundering the
dead of their ornaments. But all these things were only the
preliminaries to the conquest of the East, to which the ambitious
schemes of Henry's last years were almost exclusively directed.
Some individual Christian princes in the East had voluntarily
placed themselves under the protection of the only man who
io HEREDITARY PRINCIPLE i
at that time could afford them any : the thirty-year-old Em
peror. The king of one of the Crusader states, Bohemund of
Antioch, had besought the Emperor to be his feudal lord ;
ambassadors from the King of Cilicia had done homage to
Henry and begged him to grant their master as his vassal the
crown and title of " King of the Armenians," exchanging thus
their old feudal allegiance to the Eastern Emperor for allegiance
to the new world-ruler of the West. The messengers of King
Amaury of Cyprus penetrated as far north as Worms to ask that
their master should be feudally invested with his kingdom and
his crown at Henry's hands. Meantime Henry was now plan
ning a Crusade which was finally to unlock the East and make it
subject to him. All preparations were made with the greatest
care. The Pope, the octogenarian Celestine III, suspected no
doubt the real intention of this Holy War, but as spiritual
overlord of Western Christendom he could not, in those days
at any rate, take up any but a benevolent and helpful attitude
towards such an undertaking. Against his will he was harnessed
to the imperial plans and was able successfully to oppose the
Hohenstaufen will in one particular only.
Henry VI was well aware that his giant empire lacked
organic unity, for each of the component countries stood in a
different relation to the Emperor : Germany was an elective
monarchy ; Sicily a hereditary one ; and the other countries
were feudal dependencies, many of them mediate. He did his
utmost to pull the whole together and give it a certain stamp of
uniformity. When his son was born he thought the time had
come. He sought to win over the German princes to his
schemes by offering to the temporal princes the promise of a
hereditary succession, and to the spiritual ones free testa
mentary powers. He hoped thus to transmute the German
Elective Kingdom into a Hereditary Roman Empire. To
achieve this end he was prepared to incorporate in the Empire
his own personal hereditary kingdom of Sicily. The German
princes declared themselves in favour of these proposals : all
except the Archbishop of Cologne and a small following. In
order to overcome the last remnants of opposition the Emperor
betook himself to Rome. His idea probably was to induce the
Pope, in defiance of any protest by the princes, to crown his
FREDERICK'S BAPTISM 11
infant son as Roman Emperor and Co- Caesar. The Pope
declined, and Henry had no alternative but to do, as others
before him had done : to get his son chosen by the German
princes as their future king and thus to safeguard the Empire
for the house of Hohenstaufen.
Henry had only twice, quite briefly, seen the heir of his
immense empire : once in Foligno shortly after his birth, and
once when he (probably) attended his son's belated baptism.
The boy had been originally called Constantine by his mother
(no doubt in allusion to her own name, Constance, for she liked
to think of him as his mother's son and heir) and the German
princes had chosen him in Frankfurt for their king under this
foreign-sounding cognomen. When it came to the baptism,
however, which ultimately took place in the presence of many
cardinals and bishops — though not, as Henry had desired, of
the Pope — the child was given the names of Frederick Roger
after his two grandfathers : whom in truth he was to resemble
rather than his parents. These names had been first suggested
in a poem by Peter of Eboli, and it was not unnatural to pro
phesy a future of immense and almost god-like power for the
grandson of these two mighty princes and the son of Henry VI.
All the poets and wise men who had stood by the cradle of the
boy had shown themselves at one in this anticipation : whether
they were rejoicing, as friends of the Empire ; or, as partisans
of the Pope, were trembling for the fate of the Roman Church.
Before long, however, it looked as if all the prophets were at
fault.
King Henry was spending the summer of 1197 in Sicily.
That spring he had discovered a conspiracy of the Sicilian
nobility directed against his life and he had escaped only by
the skin of his teeth. People said that both Pope Celestine
and the Empress Constance had had a hand in the plot, and
there is nothing to render this improbable. The Emperor had
the captured ringleaders done to death with the most cruel
tortures, and he compelled his wife to be present at the ghastly
execution of her guilty countrymen, while the court jesters
played their grisly pranks with the still quivering bodies.
Soon after this the Crusade was under weigh. The great
majority of the Crusaders had sailed across to the Holy Land
12 HENRY'S DEATH i
from Sicily during the course of the summer, and it seemed
not impossible that the Emperor himself would bear a part in
the crusade, but he thought it wise to await developments, and
with a few companions he remained behind in Sicily. He did
not even see the Promised Land from afar as Barbarossa had
done. During a hunting expedition he fell ill of dysentery —
as northerners are apt to do in the dangerous summer climate
of Sicily. Within a few weeks, after an initial improvement,
he quite unexpectedly succumbed in Messina in September
1197. A chronicler announces with pride': *£ Henry showed
the world the superiority of the Germans, and they inspired
terror in all adjacent peoples by their valour." With Henry's
death all this was at once a thing of the past. German world-
rule and world-greatness, resting on the qualities of a single
man and not upon the people, was fated to crumble in a
moment.
Henry had been well aware of the danger threatening the
Empire : of that his last will and testament is overwhelming
proof. It recommends surrender on all sides and the renuncia
tion of even valid claims. In the Empire itself it was all too
well known what Henry's death at this inopportune moment must
mean : his work was still incomplete, his successor a three-year
old child. The parties of reaction, which had hitherto been
prevented by the Emperor's power and rapidity of action, now
prepared for the inevitable counter-blow. It would have been
bound to corne even if Henry had lived ; but now that the
only person competent to oppose them was dead, the forces
of opposition, Princes and Pope, hurled themselves into a
vacuum, in which they could unhindered work their devasta
ting will. Some weeks before the Emperor's death, Philip of
Swabia and Otto of Brunswick, the one a Staufen and the other
a Welf,1 had become kings in Germany, while at the same
moment Innocent III — in his own way the greatest and most
successful of all the Popes — mounted the throne of St. Peter,
as the true heir of world- wide empire. During these days some
people on the Moselle were terrified by an apparition : they had
1 The German feud of Welf v. Waibling crossed the Alps and lay beneath
the Italian struggle of Guelf and Ghibelline, which Italianised forms arti
more familiar to some. — Tr.
ii97 FREDERICK TAKEN TO SICILY 13
seen Dietrich of Bern, mounted on his immense black war-
horse, coming to foretell mourning and disaster to the Roman
empire.
While these events were happening the three-year old son
of the Emperor Henry was still in Foligno. Philip of Swabia,
the Emperor's brother, was to have fetched the boy thence and
escorted him to Germany for his coronation. But when Philip
had got as far as Montefiascone near Viterbo he received the
news of the emperor's death. The immediate revolt of all
Italy against imperial authority, and more particularly against
the hated Germans, compelled him to return at full speed
across the Alps, leaving his mission unfulfilled. He had
difficulty in hewing his way through to Germany. The few
days' delay which prevented the completion of the task that the
Emperor had entrusted to him was destined to be of fateful
consequence to the whole future of Frederick II. Firstly,
because he thus remained in Italy and grew up in the southern
kingdom of his mother, instead of in his father's Swabian home.
Secondly — and this was more serious — he thus forfeited,
through his absence from Germany, the German crown to
which he had already been elected. Quite apart from these
events in the north, and their consequences, Frederick's own
mother did her best to baulk her son of the German throne.
Soon after the death of the Emperor Henry, Constance had
the child fetched from Foligno by an Apulian count and
brought to Sicily. Dressed in widow's weeds she awaited
her son in Palermo. There were grave accusatory rumours
against the Empress current at the time : some said she had
poisoned her husband, and it was a matter of common know
ledge that she had no love for Germans. The suspicion
of murder was unjust, but the hatred for Germans ascribed
to her was genuine enough ; she shared it with her Sicilian
fellow-countrymen and with the Italians oppressed by the
Roman Curia. The foundations of this hate were the same
then as they have always been : the arrogance " allied with
unwisdom " of the Germans alienated the Mediterranean
peoples, as did their " obstinacy and self-assertiveness."
14 REACTION AGAINST GERMANS i
Their physical strength and their savagery moreover terrified
the Southerners, the discords prevailing amongst themselves
brought them scorn and contempt. For rulers of the world
they appeared " crude, coarse and uncivilised/* while their yet
unpolished language seemed to the Romans " like the barking
of dogs and the croaking of frogs." But the main factor in this
hate was fear ; fear of the inrush " of the winter and the storm
into the rose-gardens of Sicily." This fear was not allayed by
the savagely cruel treatment meted out to the Sicilians by
Henry VI. Perhaps Innocent with his biblical phraseology hit
on the right description of the German visitation of those days
when he wrote : " Because the people of Sicily and the other
inhabitants of this kingdom have grown effeminate in sloth,
and undisciplined through too much peace, and, boasting
themselves of their wealth, have given themselves over to the
unbridled lusts of the body, their stink has gone up to heaven
and the multitude of their sins has delivered them into the
hands of the oppressor."
Innocent spoke thus out of no friendliness to the Germans.
The hate of Germans that flamed up throughout Italy on the
death of the Emperor had been carefully nurtured beforehand
by the Curia, had been given the air of a national pan-Italian
movement and utilised as a means to shake off the imperial yoke
in the south in favour of a papal Italy. In resonant periods
Innocent III had taken pains to stir up and foster this hate :
" The wrath of the North wind whistles through the mountains
with a new quaking of the earth, it drives through the level
plains of Apulia, whirling dust into the eyes of wanderers
and country-dwellers." Thus he wrote about the German,
Henry VI, whom Dante also designated " that loud blast which
blew the second over Swabia's realm."
A reaction of this sort against the tyranny of Henry VI was
of course inevitable. The importance of the movement in
Sicily was enhanced by the fact that the Empress Constance
took part in it. Her motives were probably personal, for Henry
had made a terrific clearance amongst all related to the old
Norman royal house and had banished the survivors to Germany.
On his death Constance immediately resumed the sovereignty
of her hereditary domain, in accordance both with the
1198 FREDERICK KING OF SICILY 15
Emperor's instructions and with the right she herself possessed
as Norman Queen. But the new ruler of Sicily was Norman
Queen only : not widowed Empress ; and the first act of her
reign was to banish from her kingdom the Emperor's inter
preter, Markward of Anweiler, and with him all other German
notables, a considerable number of whom held fief and office
in the Norman territory. The pretext was that they might
prove dangerous to the peace and quiet of the kingdom,
especially Markward, who had not been slow to propose
himself as vicegerent. Her next step was to imprison the
Sicilian Chancellor, Walter of Palear, Bishop of Troia, who had
been from of old an opponent of the Norman dynasty and a
willing tool of the German Emperor. The intervention of the
Pope was necessary to effect the liberation of the Bishop-
Chancellor and his re-instatement in his former offices. Anti-
German feeling in the south was so acute that the first German
crusaders who were returning, all unsuspecting, from the Holy
Land were surprised and plundered by the excited Sicilians,
and after that the home-coming pilgrims had to avoid the har
bours of this dangerously inhospitable kingdom. Curiously,
the German princes who were on the Crusade, when they
received in Acre the news of their Emperor's death, reconfirmed
the choice of Frederick as King of the Romans.
Constance, however, deliberately shut her eyes to all this.
Her hate of Germany reinforced the maternal anxiety which
heroes' mothers are wont to suffer from : in the German crown
she saw a never-ending series of future perils and struggles for
her son. She would as far as possible ward off such a danger
from him. Frederick should be king of the wealthy Sicily,
and in the southern Land of Dreams he would quietly forget the
imperial dignity of his fathers. A few months after the boy's
arrival in Palermo she had him crowned King of Sicily. The
solemn rite was celebrated on Whit Sunday 1198, with a pomp
and ceremony borrowed from the Byzantine court, while in
accordance with ancient custom the people greeted their newly-
crowned king with the cry — which may still be read on every
crucifix in southern Italy — " Christus vincit, Christus regnat,
Christus imperat." It is significant to note that this is also
the motto engraved on Frederick's early seals. From that day
16 CONSTANCE AND THE POPE i
Constance omitted from all official documents of the young
king the title that had previously figured there : Rex Romano-
rum. From henceforth Frederick of Hohenstaufen was to
content himself with the many titles borne by the reges felices
of Norman stock. He was to be, body and soul, the son of the
Sicilian Constance only, and to be kept aloof from all the fatal,
unknown consequences in which the dangerous Hohenstaufen
blood of his father might involve him. One is reminded of the
childhood of Achilles or of Parzival.
The plans of the Roman Curia re-inforced in many points
the wishes of the Empress. They shared a strong aversion from
the Germans, they shared the desire to strengthen Frederick
in his hereditary possessions, and to confine him strictly to
them. Sicily was a fief of the Roman Church, and the Pope was
unfeignedly delighted to see a four-year old king on the throne
and the kingdom thrown open to papal influence for years to
come. It was a matter of life and death to the Church that the
imperial throne should be withheld from the boy. When
the empire and Sicily were united in one hand the States of the
Church were surrounded on every side by the imperial terri
tories, and after its recent experiences under Henry VI the Papal
Curia had no wish to be again exposed to this intolerable
constriction. This was the only consideration that weighed
with the Pope in formulating his imperial policy. Hence, in
defiance of right and justice, Innocent III supported the Welf
pretender against Philip of Swabia, so as to avoid the threatened
union of the Empire and the Sicilian Kingdom under any
Hohenstaufen.
Constance was in sore need of the Pope's support, so it was
well that her wishes in regard to Frederick were in unison with
his. Largely thanks to Constance's anti-German attitude, the
Kingdom of Sicily had soon fallen into a state of chaos. Henry
VTs partisans, more especially the Germans, who would in
other circumstances have stood by her, were the most embittered
and dangerous enemies of the Empress and her son. She was
powerless to enforce her decree of banishment against them,
and for ten years they successfully defied it and brought down
endless wars upon the country. The Pope was the only friend
whose alliance could help the Empress, and Innocent III sold
1198 DEATH OF CONSTANCE 17
his friendship dear enough. Constance was obliged to seek as
a favour from the Curia what the Emperor Henry had always
refused, and to implore the Pope to become the feudal overlord
of Sicily. Before this feudal protection was accorded her she
had to accept a Concordat which put an end to the unique
independence of the Sicilian Church and most of the ecclesias
tical privileges of the Sicilian kings. Constance did her best
to stand out, but she found she had no option but to comply,
and ere long a further step was necessary : a year after Henry's
death she herself lay dying, and in her will she appointed the
Pope regent of the kingdom and guardian of her son. Innocent
was to be reimbursed for all expenses, and in addition to receive
annually the sum of 30,000 tarens.1 Constance thought she
had thus put her son under good protection. She handed over
the immediate care of Frederick and the kingdom to the royal
party, the " Household Officers " of the old Norman officialdom,
which at the time of her death consisted of four archbishops,
with Walter of Palear, Bishop of Troia, at their head as Chan
cellor. On his mother's death in November 1198 Henry's son
became therefore a ward of the Pope and of the Church,
and the Sicilian kingdom fell into the care of bishops. For
the time being Frederick's German crown was lost.
The Sicilian scion of the Hohenstaufen was soon forgotten
in Germany in the midst of the rival pretensions of Welf and
Staufen to the throne, of battles, disturbances and wild
happenings. At first his name used to crop up occasionally
when someone happened to remember that beside the two
would-be kings, Philip the Swabian and Otto the Welf, there
was a third pretender whose claim to the imperial crown might
carry weight : the boy whose home was in the far-off south.
On the whole, however, the friends of the Hohenstaufens, who
might perhaps have espoused the cause of Frederick, simply
drifted into the ranks of his uncle, Philip of Swabia. Philip
was at first prepared, as " according to law and nature it was
1 The taren was the gold coin current at the time in Sicily. 30 tarens =
i gold ounce ; i tar en =20 grains. Tarens were minted in the royal mints
of Messina, Brindisi and Naples. — Tr.
i8 PHILIP OF SWABIA i
seemly," to undertake the direction of the Empire only as
regent in the name and during the minority of his young
nephew. But at such a critical moment the German princes
wanted a man, not a child, on the throne, and they almost
unanimously repudiated their choice of a short year before.
The Archbishop, Adolf of Cologne, moreover, put himself at
the head of an opposition hostile to the Staufens. In these
circumstances Philip after some hesitation yielded to the pres
sure of his adherents and declared himself willing to wear the
crown and thus secure it at least for his house. Walther von
der Vogelweide was present at the coronation in Magdeburg,
and records how he saw the c ' sweet young man," as that hand
some and luckless prince proceeded " under the crown " to the
Cathedral, accompanied by the no less beautiful and no less
unfortunate Irene, his queen and well-beloved consort. The
poet sings with what grace and dignity the prince wore the
golden circlet :
With measured step and kingly grace he came,
Behind him moved his high-born dame :
Rose without thorn, dove without gall was she. ...
The many and varied endowments of the Hohenstaufen family
had been divided in curiously contrasting fashion between the
brothers Henry VI and Philip of Swabia. The former embodied
all their stern severity and autocratic strength, the latter all
their graciousness and generosity. In contrast to the rest of
his house Philip united his attractive qualities to a perfectly
genuine piety. He had indeed been originally destined for the
Church, and might often be found sitting among the choir boys
singing the Hours and the Responsories. No milder, gentler
prince had ever swayed the sceptre of Germany's destinies ;
he was too gentle and too mild for such a time. During
Philip's joint rule of ten years he was never once able to lay
down his arms. This man who was born for times of peace
was fated to undertake campaign after campaign. Immediately
after his election the Rhenish party of opposition, led by Otto
of Brunswick, became active and secured the support of the
Papal Curia, which most unjustly sided against Philip and
excommunicated him.
INNOCENT'S "DELIBERATIO . .." 19
This is not the place to pursue in detail the feuds of Welf and
Waibling. After Innocent III, in his pettifogging Deliver atio
super facto imperii, had declared himself against the Hohen-
staufens in general and in particular against the Sicilian boy,
not even the name of Frederick played any further part in the
matter. In skilful special pleading the wily Pope weighs the
pros and cons of Frederick's elevation to the Roman King
ship. In the first place, he points out, the claim seems specious
enough, for Frederick had been duly elected, and almost all
the princes had sworn loyalty to him and many had actually
taken the oath of fealty. Nevertheless the election was in
fact invalid, because it had taken place on the assumption that
Frederick at the time of his accession would be of legal age :
but this reasonable anticipation had not been fulfilled. More
over, at the time when Frederick had been elected he was still
unbaptised. He had even been chosen under the Greek name
of Constantine. Secondly, the Pope continued, it might well
appear unseemly that the Pope should rob his ward of his just
dues, instead of being his helpful guardian. But he, Pope
Innocent, had been appointed guardian, not to secure the
Imperium for Frederick, but to defend his maternal inheritance
of Sicily. Finally, he would remind his readers of the warning
words of Scripture : " Woe to the land whose king is a child.5*
Having thus disposed of these two possible objections to
Frederick's deposition — his due election, and a guardian's
duty — Innocent weighs the consequences that would follow
the boy's recognition. With extraordinary clearsightedness
the Pope foresees the whole trend of his ward's future career.
" If once the boy reaches years of understanding and perceives
that he has been robbed of his honours as Emperor by the
Roman Church, he will assuredly refuse her reverence and
will oppose her by every means in his power, he will free Sicily
from feudal fetters and deny the wonted homage to Rome."
Innocent foresaw precisely what was in fact in store for the
Roman Church and yet he chose to act against his knowledge.
His arguments were irrefutable, and when he was driven to
speak against his own convictions he could only do so at the
sacrifice of truth. He then proceeded to show that there was
nothing to be feared from the boy's vengeance, for it was not
20 ROMANCE OF SICILY I
he, the Pope, but Philip of Swabia who had snatched from him
the Empire and the Dukedom of Swabia. Were King Philip
to presume to go further and send his vassals to take Sicily
the Church would stand by her ward with all her powers.
This decision of the Pope quashed all conceivable German
support of Frederick's claims : he had vanished from the
political and diplomatic horizon of Germany for many years to
come. For decades past, nay, longer, everything Sicilian had
worn a halo of romance in German eyes, and his German
contemporaries cherished a vision of a fairy prince living in
distant Sicily. Since the wanderings of the old Germanic
peoples Sicily had exercised on the imaginations of men a
peculiar fascination. The further the Northern invaders
penetrated south into regions of ever-increasing wealth and
luxuriance the nearer they seemed to approach the Garderi of
Eden : a dream-fulfilment of an Earthly Paradise. The very
beginning of the Germanic epoch had seen the figure of the
lion-like young king, Alaric of the Western Goths, who with
scanty knowledge but the sure instinct of an animal had fought
his way towards the southern Paradise where he was to find his
grave. The end of the same Germanic age provided a fitting
parallel in that young Conrad of Hohenstaufen who lost his
life in Sicily, The fate of the Germans seemed bound up with
the south of Italy. In one way or another almost all the
medieval Emperors had sought to win it, until the luck turned
and Barbarossa's scheming obtained it for his son Henry as
his bride's dower.
The possession of the southern world wrought a fateful
change in Germany herself : for the Crusading Knight the Magic
Hoard had flitted southward from the Rhine to Sicily. And
around the Treasure played the heroic myths of Rome and
Greece — which now began to form a part of German culture —
driving out Burgundian kings and Hunnish warriors. Bishop
Conrad of Hildesheim, who accompanied the Emperor to Sicily
as his chancellor, brought back tales in plenty to tell the Provost
of his church at home about the marvels of Sicily. He had seen
the Fountain of Pegasus, the Home of the Muses, and Naples
was full of the wonders of the magician Vergil who had enclosed
the city in a glass flagon. The Bishop had sailed — not without
CONRAD OF HILDESHEIM 21
anxiety — between Scylla and Charybdis, and in Taormina he
had gazed on the house of Daedalus, remembering the fate of
Icarus, and the Minotaur born of Pasiphae. He had seen the
Well of Arethusa which first revealed to sorrowing Ceres the
rape of Proserpine, he had seen the river Alpheus which rises
in Arabia, and Etna he had seen — which he made the occasion
of weaving into his narrative the myths of Vulcan, smith to
Jupiter, and the legend of the Blessed Agatha. Granted that
the learned Bishop saw in his travels nothing that he had not
already read in the Roman poets, yet the journey had localised
the myths for him and impressed them much more vividly on
his mind, especially as he most reverently sought out all the
places and marvels of which the poets sang. Proudly he wrote
to the Provost : " You do not need to pass the boundaries of
our own empire, you do not need to quit the realm of the
German people to see all that the poets have spent so much
time and art in describing."
Reports like these provided material and colour for German
phantasy to paint pictures of the Sicilian kingdom which
Wolfram of Eschenbach chose to be the site of his magic castle
of Klingsor. And even in the North men could see much with
their own eyes : in the year after Frederick's birth and Henry's
conquest of Sicily a caravan of 150 mules appeared in Germany
laden with gold and silks, gems and precious stones, on its way
to the imperial castle of Trifels ; and people heard that this was
only a fraction of the riches that the Emperor had plundered
from the royal citadel of Palermo. The treasure was far from
exhausted. For a messenger of the Empress overtook the
Emperor after his return to Germany, announcing that the lost
treasure of King Roger had been found. It had been concealed
behind a secret door and a woman servant had betrayed the
clue.
So the Sicilian kingdom had become to the German mind a
distant land of wonders, and Frederick II was living his child
hood in the midst of it. Others had come to know that the
wrath of the Sicilians against Henry VI was so fierce that a
certain bishop had carried the child off and was bringing him
up in secrecy for fear the inhabitants should find and slay him.
The child indeed had persecutions and wonderful escapes
22 CHAOS IN SICILY i
enough, and the actual happenings in Palermo in the ancient
royal fortress of Castellamare where Frederick passed his
childhood were more unreal and fantastic than all that legend
could invent.
When the Empress Constance died, the four-year-old boy
Frederick II was left alone in the world without a relation or
real friend of any kind. The few surviving relations on his
mother's side had been banished by Henry VI and were hostile
to the Staufen boy, and the only surviving Hohenstaufen, King
Philip, was so busy fighting in the north that tie could do prac
tically nothing for his nephew. Frederick had no lack of nominal
friends, men who without exception exploited the royal name
and dignity for their own ends, first among these Pope
Innocent III, guardian of the King. It cannot be denied that
during the ten years of fighting and confusion in and around
Sicily Innocent spared neither pains nor money to defend his
ward's kingdom. But the papal legates who always accom
panied troops sent to Sicily were despatched to protect rather
the Papal feudal state than the interests of the boy king.
Innocent's decision in the matter of the German succession,
and his attitude to the French count Walter of Brienne, showed
clearly how much less the fate of his ward weighed with him
than his own far-reaching intrigues. This Count Walter was
the son-in-law of the illegitimate Tancred, the last of the
Norman kings, and he soon put in an appearance to claim
the provinces of Lecce and Taranto. A really conscientious
guardian would have considered it too risky to permit the return
to Sicily of any member of the exiled Norman dynasty, yet
Innocent, without any overwhelming necessity, decided the
feudal questions in the Frenchman's favour, though it is true
he exacted extensive guarantees from Walter for the personal
safety of Frederick. Pope Innocent badly wanted the French
count just then ; the fate of the boy prince was secondary. Not
of course that the Pope would dream of robbing him of his
rights I But it mattered little whether Frederick II or a scion
of the Norman dynasty ruled in Sicily, provided the danger was
averted of a fusion of Sicily and the Empire, and provided that
Church influence in the kingdom was in no wise curtailed.
Pope Innocent III dealt only in practical politics. Therein
AN ORPHAN KING 23
lay his greatness. We can well understand that Frederick II
in later days thought of his papal guardian with wrath and
bitterness, though in fact nothing but the Pope's regency had
saved the kingdom for him. On the human side Innocent kept
entirely aloof from his ward. He kept up an interest in the
boy's affairs as far as he could, he sent legates to look after him,
felt anxiety for his dangers, praised his progress and expressed
unfeigned pleasure at his escape from enemy hands, but he saw
him for the first and last time when the lad was seventeen, for
he had never carried out, or never completely carried out, any
of his many projected journeys to Sicily.
The other man to whom Constance had committed her child
was the Sicilian chancellor, Walter of Palear. He remained
for many years — though sometimes with interruptions of a
year or so — in the immediate entourage of the King as head of
the household officers and de facto Regent of Sicily. But what
has been said of the Pope applies even more forcibly to the
Chancellor : he also utilised his power for his own ends, with
this difference that his ends were not of the same world-
shaking quality as the Pope's. His chief preoccupation was to
maintain as undisputed as possible his position as sole regent
of the kingdom, to retain undivided control of the King's
revenues and possessions, and to squander these freely for the
benefit of himself, his family and his adherents. Politically he
had been a supporter of the Emperor Henry and consequently
an opponent of the Norman dynasty, hence the hostility which
the Empress had felt for him. In spite of this she retained him
as Chancellor from a natural reluctance to feel that so powerful
a man was her son's enemy. Walter of Palear remained
faithful to his Hohenstaufen allegiance, partly because it seemed
useful and partly because any modification of his attitude
might have lessened his independence as regent. There is
nothing to show that he occupied himself much with the boy,
and Frederick's kter treatment of him makes this improbable.
The most we can say is that he was apparently never actively
unfriendly.
Though the Chancellor remained personally a defender of
the dynasty of Henry VI, his external politics were extremely
adaptable. He had first and foremost to protect the young
*4 SICILIAN FACTIONS i
King's interests — and his own — against the Germans, whom
Constance had unfortunately banished and converted into
enemies of herself and her son. The Chancellor, as a partisan
of Henry's, might have come to terms with them, but their
leader, Markward of Anweiler, maintained that the Emperor
had appointed him to be Administrator of Sicily. There was,
no doubt, some truth in this contention. He certainly kept in
touch with Philip of Swabia and was presumably often acting
under his instructions. These relations with Philip were
enough to bring down on him the enmity of the Pope, while his
claims to the regency of Sicily earned him the hatred of Walter
of Palear. Pope and Chancellor were not long in taking mea
sures together against Markward and the Germans. Markward
had no use for Frederick II. The " supposititious son " of
Constance — as Henry's former interpreter- chose to designate
the boy, affecting to give credence to current rumour — stood
in the way of a union between Sicily and the German Imperium
of Philip of Swabia, and all Markward Js efforts were directed
to the achievement of this union : as far as he was not merely
pursuing his own priyate interest. The papal party reported
that he had even attempted the child's life.
The general position of affairs in Sicily was further com
plicated by the appearance of the aforementioned Walter of
Brienne. The Pope had supported his claims to the duchies
of Lecce and Taranto and forthwith made use of him and his
French knights in the fight against the Germans. The Pope's
support of the son-in-law of the Norman Tancred alienated at
once the Sicilian Chancellor. As the sworn foe of the Norman
dynasty Walter of Palear looked with justifiable misgiving
on the arrival of the French count. On the first convenient
opportunity therefore he left the Pope in the lurch and went
over to the German side. The subterfuges of all parties,
differences of opinion amongst the officers of the household,
treacheries, and the force of arms ultimately resulted in deliver
ing the capital of Palermo with the royal fortress and the royal
child into the hands of Markward of Anweiler, and on his death
into the hands of other faction leaders, his successors, such as
William Capparone and Diepold of Schweinspeunt. Many
years passed before Walter of Palear, having made friends
SARACENS IN SICILY 25
again with the Pope on the sudden death of the Count of Brienne,
was able once more to re-enter Palermo.
It would be a waste of time to enter in detail into the
squabbles, intrigues, hostilities and alliances of the ten years'
Regency. The tangle is almost inextricable, for behind the
four main actors — Pope, Chancellor, Markward and Walter of
Brienne — there were innumerable subordinate characters who
attached themselves now to this party and now to that, according
as they hoped best to promote their own separate interests.
First there were the Saracens from the inner highlands of
Sicily. As Muslims they had nothing to hope from a papal
rule and were therefore hostile to the papal ward. For the most
part they leaned to the German side, though the Pope exerted
himself to secure their armed assistance. The general anarchy
offered a golden opportunity to the hill Saracens to plunder the
whole country right up to the walls of the towns — the town
Saracens in the main remained neutral — and even to occupy it
from time to time. The Barons of the Sicilian mainland 1
formed another group whose alliance was much desired and
sought after. Their policy was simple : they had nothing to
gain from law and order, so they threw in their lot with which
ever party appeared likely to promote the continuance of dis
order. The people of Pisa were another factor. They held
on principle with the Germans, for it was their established
tradition to support the Empire, but on the other hand they had
many trade interests in Sicily, and this again roused up the
Genoese against them. Ultimately, after many and varied
quarrels, the two sea states contrived to establish themselves
in every nook and cranny of the Sicilian coast.
Though in his childhood the boy Frederick appeared the
mere plaything of those forces which as a man he mastered and
directed, he was even then being educated by destiny for the
supreme power. In the small island of Sicily all the powers of
East and West were represented ; on the island and in Apulia
they tossed and tumbled and weltered, at the dictates of the
most primitive impulses, surging through and over each other
like the waves of primeval chaos : Henry VTs Germans,
1 The non-specialist reader will remember the existence of Two Sicilies
(see map inside back cover). — Tr.
26 FREDERICK BETRAYED i
Brienne's Frenchmen, Sicilians, Apulians, Saracens, Pisans,
Genoese — with here and there a papal legate and Italian troops,
and finally even Spanish knights superadded. These parties
had only one thought in common : to pursue their own most
obvious advantage, and to enrich themselves at the expense of
the helpless King, who thus became the focus of all their
struggles. The goal above all others to aim at was to get
possession of the King's person, for this child denoted for the
de facto victor and ruler the legal basis of his arbitrary power.
Much like the royal seal of Sicily Frederick was therefore
tossed from hand to hand, a valuable but indifferent piece of
property, exploited by each in turn, persecuted by the majority,
often in danger of death : " a lamb amongst ravening wolves,"
as the chronicler has it.
Such was the atmosphere in which Frederick grew up :
amid the clash of weapons, sometimes in bodily danger, and
for years in actual want. In the early days, as long as Walter
of Palear was still at hand, things may have been compara
tively bearable, but when Frederick at seven fell into the hands
of Markward, with his companions and hangers-on, a wild and
dreary time began. The circumstances that accompanied the
conquest of the royal fortress and the change of regency were
ominous enough. They are full also of significance, for Frede
rick on this occasion shows himself for the first time as a man —
of seven — in action. Markward took possession of the capital
in 1201 . A treacherous chamberlain betrayed the King's castle,
with the King, to the invaders. In this moment of danger the
King, with his tutor, William Franciscus, withdrew to the inner
most precincts of the palace. Again the guard betrayed the
King and revealed his hiding-place. The treachery of the
bodyguard and the boy King's helplessness precluded any
attempt at defence : Frederick suddenly saw his pursuers
enter the room. As they sought to seize him — to fetter him it
might be — the young King, in spite of the hopelessness of the
struggle, sprang at the intruders, full of loathing at the thought
of being touched by dastard hands, and fiercely smote the hand
that dared to lay a finger on the Anointed of the Lord. Seeing
AET. 7 A ROYAL EDUCATION 27
himself overpowered, he unlaced his royal tunic, rent his
clothing wrathfully to ribbons, and with sharp nails tore his
flesh : an outburst of childish but profound and savage wrath
against the insulters of his royal dignity. Such at least is the
interpretation put on this scene by the correspondent who
describes it to the Pope ; the writer adds : " a worthy omen
for the future ruler who cannot be false to his own nobility,
who with royal instinct feels himself, like Mount Sinai, out
raged by the touch of a beast of prey."
From this time forward no one in the fortress seems to have
bothered his head about the boy. The royal property had been
so shockingly squandered that the child was often literally in
want of the barest necessaries till the compassionate citizens
of Palermo took pity on him and found him food. One fed
him for a week, another for a month, each according to his
circumstances. He was a handsome boy whose clear bright
glance already caused remark, and the people were probably
glad to see him amongst them. At eight and nine years old
the young King wandered about without let or hindrance, and
strolled unchecked through the narrow streets and markets and
gardens of the semi- African capital at the foot of the Pellegrino.
An amazing variety of peoples, religions and customs jostled
each other before his eyes : mosques with their minarets,
synagogues with their cupolas stood cheek by jowl with Norman
churches and cathedrals, which again had been adorned by
Byzantine masters with gold mosaics, their rafters supported by
Greek columns on which Saracen craftsmen had carved in
Kufic script the name of Allah. Round the town lay the plea
sure palaces and fountains of Norman Kings in the exotic
gardens and animal preserves of the Conca d'Oro, the delights
of which had inspired the Arab poets. In the market-places
the people went about their business in many-coloured con
fusion : Normans and Italians, Saracens, Jews and Greeks.
The lively boy was driven back on all these for company and
soon learned the customs and the speech of all these tribes and
races. Did any wise Im£m play the part of Chiron to the lonely
child ? Did some unknown tutor teach the future ruler of
men to observe, to know, to use, the forces of Earth and Nature ?
We do not know. We are certain only that his education was
28 A SELF-TAUGHT KING i
unique and radically different from any that ever fell to the lot
of a royal child. Later, men marvelled at his knowledge of
the habits of man and beast and plant as profoundly as they
trembled at his actual approach.
Frederick was not brought up, as his father for instance had
been, by a learned chaplain of the type of Godfrey of Viterbo,
nor reared like many another prince by world-shy monks in
the seclusion of a cloister. Amazed by his comprehensive
knowledge, his astounding exotic erudition, men have sought
diligently: to trace the real teacher of this great Hohenstaufen —
research has not revealed his Aristotle. And with reason.
The teacher never existed whom he would not have surpassed
and disillusioned, and the school of a mere fencing-master
would not long have satisfied him. Frederick II is a typically
self-taught man : he had no one to thank for his education :
what he was, he was sud virtute. Quite possibly he learnt the
elements from that Magister William Franciscus who has once
been mentioned in attendance on him as a seven-year-old child,
and is on record as still with him in 1208. Quite possibly one or
another of the papal legates may have taken an interest in him
and taught him the necessary amount of Scripture. Quite
possibly he received irregular instruction now and then in
other things, but he never enjoyed a systematic education. His
later learning bears all the marks of being not the product of
" school " but of life itself. He was compelled from his
tenderest years to absorb directly, without extraneous aid and
from every source, the strength he needed. This differentiated
his knowledge both in its content and in its application from
that of his contemporaries. Stern Necessity was his first tutor,
and she — to. quote the Pope's expression — " taught him the
eloquence of grief and of complaint at an age when other
children scarcely lisp aright." His next instructors were the
market-places and streets of Palermo : Life itself. He laid the
foundations of his wisdom in those wanderings which made him
the friend of every man.
The vital importance of the fact that Frederick spent his
childhood in Sicily has never been ignored. The Romano-
Germanic mixture in his race inheritance, Swabian-Burgundian
on his father's side, Norman-Lorraine on his mother's, guaran-
AET. 12 FREDERICK'S SELF-WILL 29
teed a certain mental and spiritual universality of gifts. These
gifts Sicily fostered. Here in Palermo three great cultural
systems existed side by side, in tangible reality : Antiquity, the
East, the Church. Not merely the breath and spirit, but the
languages, rites and customs, and the human atmosphere of
those three worlds were familiar to the child from babyhood.
Pope Innocent once wrote : " His hereditary land, rich and
noble beyond the other kingdoms of the world is the port and
navel of them all." The phrase might be read almost in its
literal sense. Sicily was the navel of the new world that was
here to come to birth.
The rule of Markward of Anweiler and his successors lasted
five years, and five years lasted also the free unfettered vaga
bondage of the young Sicilian king. When, at the beginning
of 1207, Walter of Palear resumed the charge of his protege,
the Chancellor and his following must have been surprised at
the maturity of the twelve-year old prince. His conduct and
manners they found " awkward and unseemly," but this they
attributed to the " rude company " he had been accustomed to
and to no fault of his own nature, and they were only distressed
to think that " his too widespread intercourse with all and
sundry, and the public comment thereby provoked " might
dimmish the due reverence of the Sicilians for their King. His
royal bearing and autocratic dignity were immediately remarked ;
his complete unreceptiveness to reproof was no less manifest.
" He will follow only the dictates of his own will," they said.
The boy possessed immense strength of will, which had been
left entirely untamed. Only Frederick himself, and Frederick's
own intelligence, and stern necessity at times, had ever curbed
it ; hence no doubt the unruliness of the boy, and the iron
determination of the later Emperor that brooked no opposition.
At twelve Frederick wanted to dispense with all regencies and
guardianships. It was " disgraceful " to his boyish pride to
be a ward, and to be treated as a boy and not a king. He
already compelled respect from those who saw him, and it
was clear that unconditional obedience would soon be the
order of the day. This self-confidence of his, not artificially
stimulated, but an entirely natural growth, made it possible for
him to take liberties which, people sometimes thought, often
30 LUST FOR KNOWLEDGE i
overstepped the measure of what is allowed a king. On the
other hand his entourage could not deny the complete assurance
of his behaviour ; they had to admit that the young king had an
unerring instinct for the true and the false, an opinion of his
own, and an eagle eye to discern the nature of the men around
him. His inborn kingliness and the nobility of his race
enabled him, as Innocent once wrote, " to tread firmly on
both feet." During the years of his unrestricted wanderings
Frederick had thoroughly exercised his body. He was only
of medium height, but even as a boy nimble and untiring.
He had powerful limbs which gave him great natural endurance
in every sort of physical exertion. He was skilful and efficient
in handling any and every type of weapon. Even in the early
days he was a good archer and a passionately keen horseman
with a particular love of well-bred horses, as indeed we should
naturally expect, remembering the famous huntsman he after
wards became. He was particularly skilful in fencing with the
sword, and his opponents must sometimes have had a tough
time of it, for with his fiery temper he easily worked himself
into a passion during a fight. What struck people especially
was that he " never passed a day quietly in continuous activity."
If he had had exercise during the day the twelve-year-old boy
would work late into the night to extend his knowledge. His
favourite reading was history— probably Roman history— the
tale of wars and deeds of arms. He thus showed already the
unresting activity and zeal common to men of his quality which
often made the Emperor seem more than human. He was able
nevertheless to preserve the power of quiet reflection.
Pope Innocent was not to be troubled with the boy much
longer. Like the other Hohenstaufens Frederick matured
extremely early, but it was not that unhappy precocity (so
often observed in Germans) which precedes a rapid exhaustion
of strength after the prime. That old saying, which Pope
Innocent once quoted of his ward, " the manhood of a Caesar
sets m before its time " might apply to the whole house of
Hohenstaufen. The country of his boyhood and the self-
reliance which his severe youth imposed on Frederick as a
child probably accentuated this natural tendency. The Pope
at any rate reported that the boy was striding to the threshold
MARRIAGE NEGOTIATIONS 31
of maturity with winged feet, and that day by day he grew in
wisdom and efficiency. Men praised his clearheadedness and
shrewdness and remarked that you must not judge Frederick
by the tale of his years, for in knowledge he was already a man
and in dignity already a ruler. In spite of his almost super
human ability Frederick was no artificially- reared phenomenon,
but merely the best that can be hoped from youth. It was the
thoroughness and completeness of his development, his absolute
normality that was remarkable ; he was completus they said.
Similarly of his stature : " You must not picture the King as
exactly small, but neither must you imagine him taller than
befits his years/' And another writes : " So completely has
the King developed the knowledge and strength suited to his
age that you will find in him onfy what would grace a perfect
man.5) Thus the moment rapidly approached when Frederick
could shake off the yoke of guardianship. In accordance with
the feudal law of Sicily he came of age as King of Sicily with
the completion of his fourteenth year.
Pope Innocent was anxious completely to fulfil his duties as
guardian before finally releasing his ward. He married the
boy. The Empress Constance had had in view a matrimonial
alliance with the royal house of Aragon, and when Frederick
at seven fell into the hands of Markward of Anweiler the Pope
for practical reasons took up the scheme again. In 1202 he
negotiated a betrothal between his ward and Sancha, the sister
of King Peter of Aragon. The Pope's calculation in the matter
was that King Peter would have to send a body of Spanish
knights to Sicily to free Frederick from the power of Markward
the German. He hoped, moreover, that the Spanish Queen-
Mother would go to live in Sicily to bring the boy and girl
together. For the Pope did not consider wholly suitable or
desirable the exclusively male atmosphere in which Frederick
was growing up. But the Pope's plans fell through and the
betrothal was cancelled. During the following years, however,
Innocent did not lose sight of an alliance that would spell no
small advantage to the Church — Aragon, like Sicily, was a
feudal fief of the Holy See. After lengthy criss-cross negotia-
32 THE ARAGON ALLIANCE i
tions he brought about another betrothal— which irresistibly
recalls the fables of the patriarchs and other fairy tales. Frede
rick is now to marry, not the young Sancha, to whom he was
originally engaged, but her much older sister, Constance.
Constance had been married to the King of Hungary, had just
recently been widowed and was a full ten years older than the
Hohenstaufen lad. The Pope had considerable difficulty in
gaining the consent of the fourteen-year old Frederick to this
match, but here for the first time he bowed to immediate State
necessity. Constance of Aragon promised to bring him as her
dowry five hundred Spanish knights to help him to reconquer
his completely disintegrated Sicilian kingdom. And this troop
of warriors — who ultimately were to prove a bitter disillusion
ment — seemed to the boy so invaluable that he was willing to
accept the wife into the bargain. For, althpugh he had made
some most promising attempts, he could scarcely hope unaided
to establish order in the whirlpool of anarchy that had been
raging for so many years. Pope Innocent had, it is true, during
the last years of his guardianship, seriously bestirred himself
to establish a passable state of affairs in Sicily, though he hoped
that the really essential work would be done by the Aragon
contingent. He had, however, himself crossed the frontier
into the kingdom and had assembled the Sicilian nobles in
San Germano (near Monte Cassino on the border of the States
of the Church) and had proclaimed a general peace throughout
the land. To maintain this peace he appointed the two most
powerful vassals of continental Sicily as Grand-Captains, hoping
thus to neutralise their dangerous power. The papal efforts
were not of any very decisive value, but, nevertheless, after
the years of chaos the hand of authority began to be felt in the
northern half of the kingdom, the Sicily that marched with the
States of the Church. In the island itself, on the other hand,
everything remained in a bad way until the young King, soon
after attaining his majority, began to tackle matters himself with
zeal and vigour. As soon as he was independent the boy — only
just fourteen — displayed extreme daring. He issued challenges
simultaneously in several directions against those who actually
or apparently infringed his royal rights. On the 26th of
December, 1208, the king's fifteenth birthday, the Pope for-
AET. 15 FREDERICK OF AGE 33
mally laid down his guardianship. From this moment
Frederick ruled alone. Two weeks later followed his first
brush with the Pope, the mighty Innocent — a beginning full of
promise. The point at issue was the appointment of a new
incumbent to the Archbishopric of Palermo. With the King's
approval the Cathedral Chapter proposed an election. Three
of the Chapter, however, objected, for reasons unknown, and
appealed to the Pope. The King considered this appeal a
direct infringement of his authority. He banished the appel
lants from the kingdom, and wrote to the astonished Pope
that the moderation of his action was solely due to the respect
he felt for the Pope personally and for the Church in general.
Innocent III, one of the most powerful rulers the world has
known, was at that moment recognised by all the monarchs of
Europe as the verus Imperator of Christendom. He by no
means shared his ward's view of the situation. According to
the Concordat which Constance had signed with him the right
of the Sicilian king in episcopal elections was confined to one
single point : the Chapter elected the Bishop without royal
interference, but the King's consent was necessary before the
enthronement could take place. The final word, however,
remained with the Church, for even after his enthronement
the Bishop could officiate only after the Pope in final instance
had ratified the election. Thus, even if the King and Chapter
were at one in their choice of the future Bishop, the Pope
retained the right to reject a persona ingrata — and the persona
grata of the King was almost invariably ingrata to the Pope.
According to this Concordat, therefore, Frederick had only the
right of consent. He had not the shadow of a right to prevent
a direct appeal to the Pope, even if this would have been con
trary to the older, now abrogated, privileges of the Norman
Kings. Pope Innocent was wise enough to dismiss this affair
with a long exhortation couched in paternal terms, the gist of
which was that Frederick had lent an ear to unwise coun
sellors. He must let secular business suffice him and not
stretch out a hand towards affairs of the spirit which were
reserved for the Pope alone. " It would have beseemed thee
to reflect, and to have been warned thereby," he wrote, " how by
the evil-doing of thy forefathers in seeking to arrogate to them-
34 BRUSH WITH THE POPE I
selves spiritual authority, thy kingdom was plunged into the
chaos and confusion that thou wottest of." A detailed exposition
of the Empress's Concordat followed, and Innocent concluded
his homily with the command that the banished members of
the Cathedral Chapter should be forthwith summoned back to
Palermo.
Frederick was unquestionably in the wrong and had no option
but to obey. The interesting point is this : that in his very
first act of government Frederick had put his finger with un
erring instinct on the vital question of episcopal election which
was for decades to provide the ostensible bone of contention in
his quarrels with the Curia. In compensation for this setback
Frederick had greater success in another direction. We cannot
be quite sure what the first measures were which the young
King took to restore order in his kingdom, but he must have
accomplished much more in this way than it has till recently
been the fashion to recognise. One thing is certain : in the
spring of 1209 he undertook a royal progress " with great force "
through Sicily, by way of Nicosia to Catania and on to Messina.
We learn from his own words that this was no peaceful pilgrim
age : he quelled " the sons of disturbance who hated peace, so
that they bent their necks under his yoke." Within a few
months the fourteen-year-old King had more than half subdued
the North-East of the island and was evolving further plans
of action. Individual proclamations, whose authoritative tone
leaves nothing to be desired, indicate clearly that he was intend
ing to cross to the mainland and re-establish there his royal
authority. For that he wanted Aragon assistance.
While Frederick was still a minor his marriage with Constance
had been celebrated in the cathedral of Saragossa, a Sicilian
Bishop acting as the King's proxy. The Queen's arrival in
Palermo was planned for March 1209, but she did not reach
the Sicilian capital till August. She was accompanied by her
brother, Count Alfonso of Provence, and the five hundred
promised knights. Frederick, who was still in Messina,
hastened to Palermo, where the wedding ceremonies were
solemnised forthwith. Immediately after the festivities Frede
rick wanted to set out for Messina, to undertake without delay
his projected campaign on the mainland. A year before, the
I209 THE ARAGON KNIGHTS 35
Pope, on the day of San Germano, had gathered together
several hundred feudal knights, and these with the Spanish
contingent would have constituted a very considerable force.
All the hopes of the young King were doomed. The Spaniards,
on whose help he had so eagerly counted, were struck down —
either during their preparations for the start, or immediately
after leaving Palermo — by an epidemic of plague, which slew
the majority of them, including Count Alfonso the Queen's
brother. This tragedy rendered the projected campaign
impossible. Worse still, the discontented Sicilian barons
seized the opportunity of their King's embarrassment to form
a conspiracy to rid themselves of their inconvenient master :
a prelude to many a similar occurrence. In the most amazing
manner Frederick contrived to quell the revolt. The ring
leader was a Calabrian count. He was taken prisoner, and
Frederick on his side seized the opportunity to wring from the
conspirators a part of the Demanium, the royal demesne, which
they had unjustly seized during the days of the Regency.
This success demonstrated the determination and forceful-
ness of the young King, but also, alas, the full hopelessness of
his position. He was irredeemably impoverished, and without
foreign aid he could never succeed in accomplishing anything
in Sicily. It had been decreed by his " two mothers," the
Roman Church, his spiritual mother, and the Empress Con
stance, his mother in the flesh, that he was to wear out his life
in his Sicilian inheritance and in Palermo, the " fortunate city " ;
but the decree was theirs alone. Other tasks were to be laid
on him. While he was still pluckily pitting himself against
the Sicilian chaos, important events' had been taking place
in Germany. More than a year before, in June 1208, King
Philip of Swabia had been treacherously murdered in Bamberg
by the Count Palatine, Otto of Wittelsbach. Frederick, the
Pope's ward, was now the last of the Hohenstaufen. A new
vista opened before him : the mothers could no longer hold him
down, the call had come to rise and join his fathers.
II. PUER APULIAE
Innocent III becomes Pope Theories of the Papacy
The Priest-State Murder of Philip of Swabia
Otto of Brunswick crowned in Rome, 1209 Revolt of
Apulian nobles Otto deposed Frederick sets out for
Rome, March 1212 Genoa, Cremona, Chur, Constance
The Children's Crusade Alliance with French — —
Re-elected German King, Dec. 1212 Crowned in
Mainz, 1212 The regia stirps of the Hohenstaufen
The Welf-Waibling feud Guelf and Ghibelline in Italy
The Ghibelline spirit Bouvines, 1214 Golden
Bull of Eger Lateran Council, 1216 Innocent's
death, 1216 Frederick's entry into Aix ; coronation
Barbarossa's re-interment of Charlemagne, 1165
Frederick takes the Cross
II. PUER APULIAE
POPE INNOCENT III — by birth Lotario dei Conti — presided over
the Christian world with a plenitude of actual power which
many a bishop of Rome has claimed, but none other before or
since has exercised. This learned priest, with his aristocratic
Roman features, his majestic and distinguished air, was favoured
in no common measure by the moment of his birth. He
studied theology and law in Paris and Bologna and was com
pletely master of the learning of the day. He was barely
thirty-seven when in 1198 he mounted the papal throne, three
months after the death of Henry VI.
The world which that great Hohenstaufen Emperor had
welded into temporary unity immediately fell to pieces at his
death, and no single power was competent seriously to challenge
the papal claims still inspired by the spirit of Gregory VII. It
was generally recognised as the particular business of the Roman
Emperor to hold the balance of power against the Pope, but in
the Imperium of that day there was no Caesar. It was rent
asunder by the Welf-Waibling faction-fight, and so — since the
world needs must look to an overlord — Pope Innocent held
sway within the Empire as almost the verus imperator which he
was called by his contemporary, Gervase of Tilbury.
The phrase was no idle curial flattery : Innocent's own
figures of speech were more arrogant still, though it was reserved
for Dante's pope, Boniface VIII, nearly a century later to coin
the classic formula of papal-imperial majesty : " Ego sum
Caesar, ego imperator," before with him there passed away the
two centuries of papal claim to world dominion initiated by
Gregory VII.
Innocent III, holding a place in time half way between
Gregory and Boniface, was the actual fulfiller of the papal claim
to universal rule. A chronicler writes : " The Church in his
day, in the glory of her bloom and the zenith of her power,
held sway over the Roman Empire and over all Kings and
39
4o INNOCENT III n
Princes of the universe." As cardinal, Innocent had written
a book On the Contempt of the World ; in spite of this and of his
own Spartan mode of life — which he was fond of holding up
as an example to others — his whole being was permeated by
a profound belief in the sanctity and dignity of his priestly
office, a belief which dictated the display on occasion of
majestic and imperial pomp. Thus, for instance, contrary to
custom, he delayed his enthronement for many weeks after
his election in order to add to the glory of the ceremony by
taking his seat in the chair of St. Peter on the very festival of
St. Peter's Chair. No doubt he wanted to play the part of
Peter on that day — as at times he liked to take the role of Christ.
A witty story is told that he had once donned the " coat without
a seam/' preserved in the Lateran, to see whether the Master
had not been a smaller man than he ; but, alas, it proved too
big. He felt himself to be completely the Emperor of Christen
dom, and in fact he was so in a quite peculiar way. As ruler and
statesman of the first water he was the first to make the Church,
in its narrower sense of the hierarchy of priests and bishops,
really an effective " State," an Absolute Monarchy in which he
himself as sole autocrat was sole fountain of power, justice and
mercy.
Innocent's life was immensely rich in events of magnitude :
he saw in turn all the kings of Europe kneel at his feet to receive
their countries from his hand in fee ; in the interests of the true
faith he conjured up all the horrors of the Albigensian war ;
he first banned the Crusaders who conquered Byzantium and
then founded a Latin Empire in the East under the aegis of the
Latin Church ; but this eventful life does not here concern us.
Our interest lies only with the statesman who proclaimed
himself the spiritual father of Frederick II, appointed by God
to replace the earthly father he had lost ; who in the line of
medieval monarchs filled the hiatus that fell between the son
and the grandson of Barbarossa, the aroma of whose spiritual
reign still filled the air when the last of the Hohenstaufens
mounted the imperial throne.
The royal High Priest of the Christian Church, the verus
imperator of the Christian Empire, the first judge of Christen
dom, these three are one and of one origin : they are the Pope.
THEORY OF THE PAPACY 41
That is roughly the underlying principle which first comes to the
fore with Innocent III, not as a claim but as an axiom, a rounded
whole, a " Summa." Innocent's point of departure was that the
Pope — though the successor of the prince of the apostles — was
not his representative on earth, not the representative of any
man, but the representative of Christ himself, and through him
the representative of God. Direct from God himself he held
the plenitude potestati$> the sum total of all power, from which
derive all earthly powers : the priest's, the judge's and the
king's. Innocent in an unprecedentedly ambitious exposition
of the papal role of mediator inculcated this doctrine most
explicitly. All power is from God. The Pope, however, is
placed as " mediator between God and man ; nearer than
God, further than man ; less than God but more than man,"
and to complete the circle of transmitted power he further
states : " God is honoured in us when we are honoured, and in
us is God despised when we are despised." From this latter
postulate sprang the later dogma, probably first formulated by
Thomas Aquinas, " submission to the Pope is essential to every
man for the salvation of his soul."
This dual position of the Pope as mediator made possible
the transmission of power which is closely bound up with
Innocent's transmutation of the Church into a Priest-State.
The first conception of the hierarchy as a State was not his, but
by a fortunate concurrence of time and opportunity its realisa
tion was his work. The priestly power was derived from God
through the papal mediator, and if this was to pass over
immediate and uninterrupted to the bishops, it was in the highest
degree important that every other influence should be ruled out
at their election, especially the influence of despised secular
authorities — whatever ancient privileges King or Emperor might
claim. Shrewdly, skilfully, unscrupulously, Pope Innocent
contrived to stage-manage in his own sense the bishops'
elections in all countries, exploiting for his own ends the politi
cal impotence that crippled Europe (with the sole exception of
France). Sometimes he made treaties, sometimes concordats,
and he contrived ere long to end the whole question of investi
ture disputes, and make the bishops throughout the Christian
world his own immediate dependants, creatures whom he —
42 THE CHURCH-STATE n
and in still wider measure his successors — began, like the veriest
autocrat, to appoint, remove, transfer, according to papal
caprice. This he had the right to do, for this Pope-god was
mighty to bind or to loose the spiritual wedlock — otherwise
indissoluble — of the bishop with his diocese, " not as man, for
he was not the vicegerent of man, but as God, for he was the
vicegerent of God."
With this " freedom of episcopal elections " the constitution
of the Church achieved its complete independence of the
temporal powers. On a plane above the profane world the
Church became a peculiar state, in which the bishops played
only the part of obedient civil servants, provincial governors
and ambassadors of their papal Imperator. The divorce of the
secular power from the Church patronage it had hitherto en
joyed was made final and complete by the papal Legates, who
as plenipotentiaries of the Pope ranked above the archbishops
themselves and supervised the activities of the bishops' offi
cials, without the secular power being in a position to protest
at finding itself deprived of all supervision over the Church.
Corresponding agreements, including the right of sending
legates to the individual countries, were now usually added to
treaties. A third stipulation commonly reserved to the priests
the " right of direct appeal/' the right that is to say of every
priest to approach the Pope without the intermediary of the
secular power. This first secured the real cohesion of the
spiritual State whose head was the Pope. If the firmly dove
tailed fabric of the Church-state were not to be sprung, a
further consequence inevitably followed : no " officials " of the
Pope, with isolated exceptions, should in the future be amenable,
as to a certain extent they had been heretofore, to secular courts.
This necessitated a further development of the Canon law
which Innocent made by a collection of Decretals, a work thus
inaugurated by the Pope himself, though not completed till
twenty years after his death. Like all the great Popes of the
later Middle Ages, especially his predecessor Alexander III,
Innocent was a first-class jurist, which in those days was almost
synonymous with statesman. It is self-evident that if this great
work of building up his state was to reach perfection he had
no option but to proceed without scruple and without ruth.
PRESTIGE OF THE PRIEST 43
The bishops and priests had hitherto been wont, not without
advantage, to play off the papal against the royal power, and
vice versa. The freedom that they lost, however, by the meta
morphosis of the Church into a well-knit, monarchical, priest-
state based on obedience, was made good in other ways. By
Pope Innocent's lofty conception of his priestly office the
prestige of the cleric vis-d-vis the layman was immensely
enhanced. Every ancient edict which could serve to evoke
increased respect for the priest was calkd anew into remem
brance and given fresh emphasis. For instance, the layman
was unconditionally dependent on the mediation of the priest ;
the priest must be correctly ordained ; the sacramental power of
the priest was independent of his personal unworthiness ; simony
was treason against king and state. This vital importance of
simony from a political point of view is comprehensible, since
it interferes with the transmission of grace, which instead of
proceeding from God and the Pope has been bought for money.
This new aloofness of the priest and his severance from the
lay world is clearly marked by certain pregnant innovations in
ritual, provoked by acute reaction against the heretics — just
now beginning to show their heads — one of whose expressed
aims was to lessen, the cleavage between the layman and the
priest. Amongst these new ordinances may be cited, for
instance, the rule that the priest henceforth completes the
mysteries with his face turned towards the altar and the East,
and with his back to the people, not facing the congregation
as heretofore : " less than God, but more than man." The
presence of the lay worshippers has become a matter of indif
ference in face of the magic metamorphosis of the elements
which was wrought by the priestly benediction — the " Tran-
substantiation " as Pope Innocent first described the mystic
miracle. In 1215 he elevated this doctrine into a dogma.
The reformed papacy of the eleventh century had under
Gregory VII initiated the emancipation of the papal office and
the papal elections from the power of the Emperor. Innocent
III gradually extended this emancipation down to the bishops
and sought to free their election and their office from temporal
influences. This, however, was a very different matter,
fraught with no little danger to the Church : might not a
44 THE POPE AS MEDIATOR n
temporal ruler on his part create a wholly temporal state
exempt from all allegiance to the Church ? It has too seldom
been remarked that it was the Church who first craved complete
severance, and achieved it by every means in her power, who
first, by the creation of a unified self-sufficing priest-state,
furnished a model for a wholly temporal empire. The most
remarkable point is, however, that the Church herself laid down
certain principles — in somewhat " unorthodox " fashion — for
this imitation of the spiritual by the temporal empire. *
It was inevitable that the Pope should stress the uncon
ditional and unique quality of his office as mediator with
reference to priestly power. But it is notorious that he did
not confine himself to this : the plenitudo potestatis conferred
on him as God's vicegerent rendered him the mediator not only
for all spiritual, but also for all worldly authority — the knightly
as the kingly. The very words in which he celebrated his
media torship, in what was practically a self-apotheosis, added a
rider to the well-known doctrine : as mediator it was his mission
" to judge all men, but to be judged of none." This priestly
spirit which breathed fire into Innocent's judicial functions
endowed the temporal power with new strength. This faith
in the actual, uninterrupted working and overflowing of divine
power, through the Mediator, into judges and kings as well as
into priests, constituted the very essence of the medieval
mediatorship. This conception had been till now foreign, in
lay affairs at any rate, to the medieval mind. True, the ruler
received his power always direct from God as a fief, a beneficium,
but he, as a temporal sovereign, was no mediator in the priestly
sense. Innocent, of course, was not concerned to distinguish
a spiritual and a temporal mediatorship, since the totality of
power, the plenitudo potestatis y dwelt in him alone, as High
Priest. All the greater would be some day the portent when
the temporal power would claim the temporal mediatorship in
respect of royal and judicial functions, would sever this from
the mediatorship of the high priest and, following the Pope's
example, would perform its own apotheosis.
All unwitting, Innocent III had paved the road to a Kingship
and a Judgeship that should challenge the rights of Priesthood.
Eager to assert his limitless judicial powers he sought to break
THE ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK 45
down all lines of demarcation. He liked to entitle Peter the
sacerdos sivejudex, " priest or judge/' and to use the Levites as
an illustration of the essential unity of the priestly and judicial
functions. The Lord himself had recognised the fact that the
highest judicial authority was to be found in Rome. Peter,
flying from Rome, had asked the question : Quo vadis, Domine ?
and did not Christ reply : Romam venio iterum crucifigi ! Rome
therefore — that is, of course, the Pope — became the court of
highest instance on earth, with jurisdiction in worldly matters
also, wherever dubious or mysterious cases were in question.
God himself had placed the Pope, as Innocent untiringly
repeated, on the throne of Justice, so that he might pronounce
judgment also on the princes of the earth. And thus the Pope,
though for the most part not interfering in the secular admini
stration of justice, became the Over- Judge who could summon
to his forum any quarrel in all the Christian world.
In precisely similar fashion Innocent sought to fuse priest
hood and kingship. The Old and New Testament were at one,
he pointed out, in holding that kingship was a priestly, and
priesthood a royal office, and thus it was that the Saviour who
— like the Pope — had been the Mediator between God and man
was, as scion of David's royal house, a King ; as a son of God,
a Priest. Innocent lent new life to a Bible figure, hitherto
unregarded, or insufficiently exploited, by the Curia : that
remarkable foreshadowing of Christ, the Priest-King of Salem,
Melchizedek. Christ, and, as his representative, the Pope also,
was a priest " after the order of Melchizedek," such is the
perpetually recurring formula in all the writings of Innocent the
Great. With an inexhaustible variety of imagery he demon
strates that : " like as the soul is more than the body, so the
priest is more than the king/' and he applies to the Pope the
words of Scripture : " By me kings reign and princes decree
justice/5 He seeks ever fresh comparisons and metaphors to
equate the vicegerent and mediator with the Lord himself, that
he may appear as verus imperator, Emperor-Priest and Ruler
of the world. There was nothing absolutely new in all this,
save the Pope's unrelenting reiteration, which incessantly and
particularly focussed the world's attention on the priestly
empire and the imperial priesthood.
46 RIVAL PRETENDERS n
Pope Innocent achieved his end. The wearer of the papal
tiara was enthroned henceforth on giddy heights. On the
other hand, however, thanks to the great Pope's adoption of so
many symbols and tokens of the Roman Emperors, the secular
empire was saturated through and through with an atmosphere
of hieratic sanctity. And the power of the Emperor, far from
being weakened by this eloquence, received an undreamt-of
accession of prestige. Thus Pope Innocent III, a spiritual
father in very deed, must be reckoned, alongside Norman and
Hohenstaufen, as amongst the immediate ancestors and pre
decessors of the young King Frederick.
Buoyed up by such conceptions Innocent III flung himself
into the quarrel of the succession. Formerly he had favoured
Otto the Welf against Philip the Hohenstaufen, first, because
" no pope loves a Staufen " ; secondly, because a Hohenstaufen
Emperor involved the danger, of which under a Welf there was
no fear, of a fusion of Sicily with the Empire ; thirdly, because
the Welf was poor and had few adherents and would therefore
be wholly beholden to the Curia and likely to prove a useful and
obedient creature of the Pope. Lastly, the Welf was uncultured
and unintellectual, but possessed in compensation an excep
tionally powerful physique which well qualified him to be " the
secular sword of the Church." In spite of the Pope's assist
ance, however, Otto had not succeeded in making headway in
Germany against the Hohenstaufen rival. He would inevitably
have succumbed in the last campaign of the Swabian Philip
which was to have taken place in the summer of 1208. The
attitude of Rome is an infallible index to the hopelessness of his
cause : Pope Innocent withdrew his support from the Welf,
released the Hohenstaufen from the ban, recognised the latter
as king, and promised him the imperial crown if he would but
make a pilgrimage to Rome.
Just as the Hohenstaufen was on the threshold of victory
his assassination by the Count Palatine, Otto of Wittelsbach, a
purely personal revenge, and the first regicide since there had
been a German Empire, decided the succession in favour of the
Welf. For the German princes were weary of civil war and
1209 KAISER OTTO IV 47
quickly united to choose Otto of Brunswick, who hoped to
unite the claims of both parties in his own person by betroth
ing himself, with the Pope's approval, to Beatrice, the eleven-
year-old daughter of the murdered man. Pope Innocent had
conquered without effort : he hastened to declare himself ready
to crown his protege — whom he had so reluctantly thrown to the
wolves — as Emperor in Rome.
It was not the wont of the Roman Curia, since she had come
to power, to bestow the Emperor's crown without a quid pro
quo, and it was natural to demand an extra large one from her
creature Otto IV ; first, free episcopal election in Germany —
which the Hohenstaufen had always refused to tolerate — then
the recognition of Sicily as a papal fief, and an assurance of its
absolute immunity from attack ; and, finally, the cession to the
Pope of certain imperial territories in Central Italy : the March
of Ancona, Spoleto, the so-called Matilda inheritance, and
others. Jn the general confusion created by the death of
Henry VI, Pope Innocent had hastily seized these territories
from the Empire, rightly or wrongly, and under the name of
" Recuperations " incorporated them in the Patrimonium
Petri. The Patrimonium now — in this extent a creation of
Innocent's — stretched right across Italy, a self-contained wedge
driven between the papal fief of Sicily on the south and Lom-
bardy, at all times hostile to the Empire. The dream of a
united papal Italy seemed not too remote a possibility.
Otto was eager to reach his goal. He had already promised
these concessions as long ago as 1201 ; he had no option but
to cede what the Pope requested — without, however, securing
the written confirmation of the German princes. He set out
shortly to cross the Alps. As the boisterous march of his
brilliant retinue broke the stillness of Rivotorto St. Francis is
said to have sent one of his disciples to bid the future Emperor
ponder on the evanescence of earthly greatness. Otto pursued
his march. In the late autumn of 1209 he was crowned in Rome
by Innocent himself as Roman Emperor, As for Innocent, he
had, it seemed, accomplished all his desires. His protege was
Emperor ; the severance of the Hohenstaufen Sicily from the
empire of the Welfs seemed final and complete.
Suddenly events took place which threatened to overturn
48 OTTO AND THE POPE n
the whole nicely-balanced edifice of papal politics. The Welf ,
no sooner crowned, repudiated his promises. He laughed
aloud when Innocent reminded him of his earlier agreements.
In the very first negotiations about the central Italian terri
tories Otto showed himself anything but the Church's " docile
son." The barons of the Sicilian mainland gave the immediate
provocation for an incurable breach between Emperor and Pope.
The arrival in Italy of the German Otto was heralded by the
feudal nobility of Apulia as the signal to throw off for ever the
yoke of the impotent young King. The conspiracy of Septem
ber 1209, directed against Frederick by the barons of Sicily
and Calabria, had fallen through, the Apulian barons had
recourse this time to treachery. Their ringleader was the
Count of Acerra, Diepold of Schweinspeunt, one of the young
Germans who had held sway during Frederick's boyhood in
the royal castle of Palermo as successor to Markward of
Anweiler. In addition to personal advantage and the hope of
power, Diepold, like Markward, held firmly to the conviction
that Sicily belonged unconditionally to the Roman Empire,
and that the Norman heir of the Hohenstaufen was simply an
obstacle in the way of union. After the lapse of over ten years
an Emperor had appeared again in Italy. Diepold, therefore,
immediately set himself to play into the hands of Otto IV as the
only legitimate ruler of the kingdom.
Soon after his coronation in November 1209 Kaiser Otto
visited Pisa, a town that had long been in alliance with Diepold
and the Germans. Here the Apulian magnates sought him
out, did him homage, and importuned him to seize the unpro
tected kingdom, for t% none but the wearer of the Empire's
crown may reign by right in Sicily." It is true that Otto had
given the Pope assurances of the inviolability of Sicily, but he
no longer held himself bound by the promise. It matters little
whether the Emperor had from the first contemplated the
reconquest of Sicily for the Empire — following the precedent
of Henry VI — or whether he was now lured into the enterprise
by the urgency of the Apulians, reinforced by the prayers of the
Pisans. He agreed. He soon created Diepold Duke of Spoleto
— an act of open hostility to the Pope — and in the following
months, while regulating the affairs of Middle and Northern
CAMPAIGN AGAINST SICILY 49
Italy, he began, as unobtrusively as possible, to make prepara
tion for a campaign against Sicily. A further consideration
may have weighed with him. The last of the Hohenstaufen,
who was already a burden, might ere long be a danger. The
imperial crown had been denied to Frederick after Philip's
murder, but he might at least lodge a claim to his father's
inheritance in Swabia, and there had in fact been negotiations
between Pope and Emperor about some compromise with the
young King. Many motives conspired to urge Otto forward
to the fateful adventure, the Sicilian campaign.
It was a favourite boast of the Roman Curia to have f * the ears
and eyes of many )J at its disposal. It was not long before the
Pope was apprised of Otto's intentions. The Pope confessed :
" the sword we fashioned for ourselves deals us dire blows."
Now from the Welf side he saw arise the eternally recurrent
nightmare of a German- Sicilian fusion, and well knowing
that the bare possession of the Church's fief was at stake, he
began at the first symptom of danger cautiously to lay his
snares. From his base in the Lateran he put himself at once
in touch with Otto's enemies. His first step was to send an
encyclical to the German. bishops, informing them of the
Emperor's intentions. His letter began with the scriptural
phrase : " it repenteth me to have created man, " and concluded
with the exhortation immediately to release all vassals from their
oaths of fealty in the event of the Emperor's being excommuni
cated. Innocent issued no direct command, but he gave the
clearest instructions as to his wishes and their future line of
conduct towards the Emperor. The bishops must have set to
work at once to influence the secular princes, for it was easy to
foster opposition to Otto, if it did not already exist, and there
was only a question of working up a useful counter-party.
Innocent followed up his letter to the bishops by another to
the King of France, the Capet, Philip II " Augustus ". He had
always been the declared enemy of the Welf, for Otto, as nephew
of his great foe, the English King, John Lackland, was always in
alliance with England and had frequently threatened to make
war on France. The King of France had therefore been hostile
from the first to a Welf Empire, and the Pope had striven to
mediate between the two rulers. Innocent now wrote in no
5o FREDERICK'S PERIL n
peace-making spirit. He regretted he had not been so quick
as Philip Augustus to see through the Welf , told him what he
had written to the German bishops, and skilfully wove into the
end of his letter a few remarks that Otto had made. He had
said — the Pope averred — that he could not sleep at night for
very shame while the French King was still in possession of
lands belonging to his uncle, John of England : and so forth.
In this case also Innocent refrained from making positive
suggestions, but he felt fairly sure of the ultimate effect of his
poison, temperately administered. Philip Augustus was not
slow to understand. With great precaution he proceeded to
get into touch with the German princes of the opposition party,
and by September 1210 Philip of France, Innocent III, and a
considerable number of Middle German princes were at one
on the vital issues.
Innocent could now take action. Kaiser Otto, having com
pleted his preliminaries in the autumn of 1210, set out on the
march to Apulia. Just as he invaded the Tuscan Patrimonium
he was excommunicated by the Pope as agreed upon — after
the mockery of a fruitless negotiation — and his subjects were
released from their oath. For the moment this upset Otto
very little : within a few weeks he was in possession of consider
able portions of Apulia, and the course of the following year
ought to have seen the southern half of the Italian peninsula
in his hands.
The most pressing and immediate danger now threatened
the young Sicilian King. The Pope had indeed warned him of
Otto's plans, but how was Frederick to withstand the powerful
emperor ? He was not even master of his internal enemies ;
almost the whole of the feudal nobility of Sicily had volun
tarily sworn obedience to the invader. He could trust no one
in his ruined and neglected kingdom, not even, as it seemed, his
nearest entourage, for when the news came of the treachery of
the continental barons under the leadership of Diepold — whom
Frederick had himself nominated Lord Chief Justice of Apulia
— he was obliged to depose his Bishop-Chancellor, Walter of
Palear. Innocent promptly forbade such a step — the Chan
cellor was of course also a bishop — with the phrase " this is not
the time for boyish pranks," but Frederick did not revoke his
OTTO'S SUCCESSES 51
action. The Chancellor was related to the rebel barons and on
terms of the closest intimacy with them, and in view of Walter's
well-known adaptability in political matters — which Frederick
was in a better position to assess than the Pope — his retention
in so influential a post was certainly not without risk. The
threatening danger was, however, not appreciably lessened by
the Chancellor's fall.
During 1210, while Otto was still busy with his preparations,
and even in the early months of the following year, while
Aversa — encouraged to resistance by the Pope — stemmed
Otto's advance for a time, Frederick still enjoyed some prestige
in Catania and Messina, and when he passed through these
towns he must have striven to secure, as a last relic of his realm,
the north-east corner of the island, the first of his conquests.
But the Welf continued almost unopposed his career of con
quest in the Sicilian mainland ; towns like Barletta and Ban in
Apulia surrendered to him, and thereupon the two provinces of
Calabria and the Basilicata — the two nearest to the island —
declared for the Emperor. Even the Saracens of the Sicilian
highlands invited Otto to cross the sea, promising him their
support : it looked as if Frederick might well give his whole
kingdom up for lost except the city of Palermo.
Robbed of his towns, his castles, his lands, the regulus non rex
seemed face to face with inevitable ruin. Frederick, however,
had not lost his pride. In imitation of the Emperor he chose
this juncture to insert in the royal seal of Sicily the figures of
the sun and moon, symbols of world sovereignty. But even he
could scarcely cherish a serious hope of salvation. In the spring
Frederick had sought to enter into negotiations with Otto, had
declared himself ready to renounce all Swabian claims, which
he had just verified in the Swabian monastery records, and had
finally offered the Emperor several thousand pounds of gold and
silver — which it is unlikely that he possessed (for he had had
to pledge the county of Sora to Innocent to reimburse him for
the expenses of the regency). All had been in vain. The
impetuous Welf hearkened to nothing ; he " spat upon " the
tenders of Pope and King, who indeed offered only what he
already held or proposed to seize. Now, in September 1211,
he was in Calabria, about to cross the narrow river Faro. He
52 REACTION AGAINST OTTO n
was merely awaiting the arrival of the Pisan fleet which had set
sail from the Arno that same month. Meanwhile Frederick
had fallen into such straits that he kept a galley ready at anchor
near the fort of Castellamare in Palermo to secure his flight to
Africa when the ultimate need should come.
At this very moment of maximum danger the incredible
happened. Otto relinquished his certain prey, abandoned the
entire campaign, and in sudden haste took his departure from
the kingdom : the incessant machinations of the Pope had begun
to take effect. Innocent had watched Otto's progress with
acute anxiety. Negotiations, in which the Pope was prepared
to offer up his " recuperations " in Central Italy in return
for the Emperor's recognition of Sicily as a papal domain, had
produced only a momentary wavering. Nothing had been
achieved ; the Welf could only be overthrown by indirect
methods. So Pope Innocent set once more in motion all the
intrigue and diplomatic art at his command, strongly reinfofced
by edicts of excommunication ; he poured out letters to the
German princes, to the Italian clergy, to the King of France ;
threats of the papal ban against the adherents of Otto, words of
encouragement to Otto's enemies ... all to one end — to under
mine the Emperor's position in Italy and even more in Germany.
Now, at the eleventh hour, success attended the cumulative
effect of his exertions.
After lengthy secret negotiations the anti-Welf German
princes, not uninfluenced by the King of France, assembled in
September 1211 in Nuremberg, declared the excommunicated
Emperor deposed, and further — also at the instigation of Philip
Augustus, a pro-Staufen of earlier days — chose as rival King
Frederick of Sicily, the last of the Hohenstaufens. There was
in Germany no lack of wealthier and more powerful princes
than the Sicilian boy, but it was realised that for this anti-Welf
campaign there lay more might in the Hohenstaufen name than
in the wealth and weapons of other men. The glory of the
great Staufen emperors lingered yet, and a scion of this house
was secure of a far wider general support than any Thuringian
or other prince could at short notice hope to win. Nor was the
original choice of Henry's son without its weight. Thus it
came that the assembled princes unanimously despatched from
i2i2 SUMMONS TO FREDERICK 53
Nuremberg an express messenger to the Pope for his acquies
cence in, and to Frederick for his acceptance of, their election.
Friends of the Welf sent likewise warning to their master :
all Germany was in revolt, a rival king was chosen, Otto should
return with speed, his rule in Germany was at stake. Kaiser
Otto was still in Calabria wlien the German messenger arrived,
accompanied by Milanese and men from other friendly Lombard
towns. They urgently implored him to break off the Sicilian
campaign at all costs and to return to save his Imperium.
Their exaggerated reports did ill service to the emperor. A
speedy conquest of the island would have been the shortest road
to the possession of his royal rival's person, but the long-legged
Welf was aghast at the shameful treachery of the German
princes. He completely lost his head, and, " shaken to the
marrow," he quitted Sicily and hastened north. Moreover, a
dream had added to his panic : a young bear had mounted the
imperial bed ; larger and larger it grew with every moment, till
at last it filled the entire space and pushed him from his couch.
In Lodi Otto IV held one last brilliant court on Italian soil, then
crossed the Alps, in midwinter, and in March 1212 he was once
more in Frankfurt.
Frederick of Sicily was saved. And more. Immediately
after the stampede of the Welf the envoy from Nuremberg
appeared, a Swabian nobleman, Anselm of Justingen, to
announce to the boy his election as Roman Emperor and the
summons of the princes. Beyond the bounds of possibility it
seemed : just now prepared for flight, scarcely hoping to escape
with his life . . . and now — without transition — offered the
imperial diadem, the crown of all the Christian world. To his
dying day Frederick held it to be a miracle. Later, when he
spoke of his being directly singled out as an instrument of
Divine Providence, he always quoted this as the first clear call
from God, a sign from heaven " against all the probabilities or
hopes of men." In Palermo every one sought to dissuade him
from accepting the election, his wife Queen Constance above
all. (She had just given birth to her first and only son,
Henry.) The nobles of Sicily seconded her in seeking to
54 VACILLATION OF THE PRINCES n
restrain their barely seventeen-year-old king from the vague
and unpromising adventure. They scented danger for him ;
they mistrusted the bona fides of the Germans, one of whom,
Diepold, had just betrayed him. These misgivings were
assuredly not without excuse. Apart from the perilous
journey and the impoverished impotence of the King, what
assurance had Frederick that the German princes, faithless and
capricious, might not have changed their minds before his
arrival ? That conjecture struck home. For when Kaiser
Otto reappeared in Germany a number of princes veered from
Staufen to Welf again, playing the " princely game " of " hither
and thither" as Walther phrased it. And — most vital ques
tion of all — what guarantee had Frederick that the Pope, now
that Sicily was secured for St. Peter, would enter the lists to
ensure the elevation of a Hohenstaufen, and the Sicilian
Hohenstaufen at that ? For the Pope's ways were dark : he
would first cut down a Staufen to exalt a Welf, and when
successful would cast down his Welf again in favour of a
Hohenstaufen. This procedure was far removed from papal
immutability, and the best minds of the time were at a loss to
reconcile themselves to the methods of the Curia. Walther
von der Vogelweide writes bitterly of papal arrogance in his
Reichsspriiche :
For God makes kings of whom he will . . .
This word fills simple men with hope —
But then again priests say it is the Pope.
Tell us in sooth,
Which is the truth ?
Two voices in one mouth — it likes me ill.
The procedure least in accord with the whole trend of papal
policy would be the elevation of the Sicilian King to the imperial
throne. But Philip Augustus of France confronted Innocent
practically with a. fait accompli, and to hunt round for another
pretender — especially as the princes had been unanimous in
their choice of Frederick — would have been waste of time.
Facts, for once, rode roughshod over papal politics. Or did
Innocent dream that perchance the elevation of Frederick —
his ward and vassal — might even be made to subserve his own
omnipotence, for would not the Roman Emperor be in fact the
MARCH 1212 LAST OF THE HOHENSTAUFEN 55
vassal of the Holy See ? Frederick II believed that the Pope
acted under the direct compulsion of Providence, since " God,
contrary to human knowledge, had miraculously preserved for
the governance of the Roman Empire " the last of the Hohen-
staufen. So interpenetrated was Frederick by the fatefulness
of this call to the " last survivor " that he turned a deaf ear to
shrewd and prudent warnings. He recognised his mission.
He accepted his election. A joyful pride in his own uniqueness
informs the words in which he confirmed his acceptance :
" since no other was to be found, who could have accepted the
proffered dignity in opposition to us and to our right . . . since
the princes summoned us and since from their own choice the
crown is ours " The miraculous call was followed by a not
less miraculous fulfilment.
A rare and amazing luck — savouring of fairy tales and dreams
— and his own peculiar charm of personality, enabled Frederick
to reach his journey's end in safety despite unnumbered
ambushes and pursuits. Without men, without money, with
out an effective knowledge of German, at the mercy of the
Pope's support, banking on the probable good faith of a few
German princes and on the magic of his name, he set out,
following the star, from Palermo to Messina, to conquer the
Empire for himself. With the long reddish-blond curls of his
family, his boyish appearance, his " fair and gracious coun
tenance : merry the brow and merrier yet the sparkle of the
eyes," the sunburnt Sicilian boy looked less like the " chosen
Roman Emperor" that he styled himself, than a fairy prince
or an adventurer in tatters. For " as torn and ragged as a
beggar boy " he boarded a foreign vessel in the middle of
March 1212 and with a handful of retainers quitted his here
ditary home.
At the Pope's request Frederick's infant son, Henry, was
crowned King of Sicily before his father's departure — for
Innocent was again striving to forestall the new danger of the
fusion of the two kingdoms — and the Regency was entrusted
to the Queen. Frederick had also been obliged to renew in
writing his mother's Concordat with the Pope and was presently
to reconfirm it in person. Hence Rome was his immediate
goal. He was held up nearly a month in Gaeta, probably
S6 FREDERICK IN ROME n
because the Pisan fleet, faithful to the Welfs, was lying in wait
for him. He did not arrive in Rome till the middle of April.
He was received with the utmost honour by Pope Innocent and
the Cardinals, the Senate and the People of Rome, who, accord
ing to ancient Roman custom, recently revived, " collauded "
him as Roman Emperor. For the first and only time Innocent
and Frederick met face to face, but little has been put on record
of this memorable interview between the rising and the setting
suns.
As King " by the grace of God and of the Pope " Frederick
presented his credentials to his erstwhile guardian, to whom,
under God, he owed all power. Further he had, according to
the custom of the Norman Kings of Sicily, to do homage and
take the oath of fealty. This done the interests of Pope and
Hohenstaufen were one. Innocent spoke words of encourage
ment and gave what help he could. He took on himself the
expenses of Frederick's brief stay in Rome, and sent him on his
way after a few days, equipped with a sum of money. In later
years Frederick liked to recall his departure from the City of
Cities, to celebrate it in a peculiar and symbolic way : " Not
the Pope, not the German princes, but the Populus Romanus,
yea glorious Rome herself, had sent him forth, as a mother sends
her son, to scale the highest heights of Empire/' and it may have
been in that supreme moment that he felt " the august spirit of
the Caesars take possession of the boy," as he triumphantly
expressed it in a later document.
Little, however, of the ancient glory of the Caesars just then
surrounded the Staufen prince. The land journey was too
unsafe on account of Otto's garrisons, and so, on a hired
Genoese ship, the " Son of the Church J5 (the Pope's phrase),
the " Priestling-Emperor," to quote his opponents, continued
his journey and arrived on the ist of May at Genoa, a town that
in rivalry with Welf-loving Pisa clung to the Staufen house.
Here and everywhere he was received with honour and hailed
with delight. But weeks passed and still the impatient lad was
held up in Genoa because all the roads were unsafe. This
proved, however, to be the last serious interruption to his
journey. In exchange for a mass of promises that bore the
quaint postscriptum " valid for the day when I am Emperor,"
JULY 1212 CROSSING THE LAMBRO 57
Frederick extracted money from the Genoese for his main
tenance, whilst Pavia shouldered the expenses for his journey
from Rome to Genoa. In the middle of July the King set out
for Pavia with a few friends and, a Genoese escort. The direct
road was held by forces from the Welf towns, so Frederick
made a detour via Asti and thus at last arrived circuitously at
Pavia. Clergy, knights and populace received him as if he were
already the crowned Emperor, and carried over his head the
canopy " as the custom of imperial majesty demands."
The crucial test lay still ahead. To reach Cremona Frederick
must fight his way through hostile country. Piacenza lay
across his path. Any serious circuit would take him too near
Milan. Besides, the people of Milan and Piacenza had already
got news of his journey and of his plans, and had armed them
selves in great wrath and excitement and had brought forth
their standard-bearing chariot for the fray. The loyal folk of
Pavia had publicly made oath to convey their future Emperor
to safety by force or guile, and to this end had made a compact
with the Cremonese to meet them halfway at the river Lambro.
The Milanese, however, marched south to the same rendezvous,
while the Piacenzans held up every ship sailing down the Po and
searched it thoroughly to find the Staufen boy.
As the vesper bells were ringing one Saturday evening at the
end of July the Pavians set out at dusk and rode all night with
their guest till they reached the Lambro. Faithful to their
promise the Cremonese, under the Margrave of Este, had started
at the same time, and they also reached the river in the grey
dawn of the Sunday morning. While both parties were
enjoying a brief rest the Milanese suddenly appeared to seize
the King. At their approach he flung himself on a barebacked
horse — so the story goes — and swam the river, as little moved
by the taunts the Milanese hurled after him as by the bloody
massacre they made amongst his returning Pavians. Frederick
himself was saved. A few moments had been decisive. People
were amazed. They opined that " Christ sought to show forth
his wonders," and when Frederick finally arrived in the ever-
faithful Staufen town of Cremona they received the lucky
youth with loud rejoicing and welcomed him as if they saw in
him " the angel of the Lord." There was now no holding
58 ENTRY INTO CONSTANCE n
Him : from Cremona (which was not slow to secure consider
able earthly benefits from the unearthly visitant, and see them
duly put on record too), he hastened to Mantua ; from Mantua
to Verona ; from Verona up the valley of the Adige to Trent.
Further than this he could not use the Brenner road because the
Dukes of Meran and Bavaria were supporters of Otto. Hence
he had to leave the great Alp thoroughfare, and turning west
wards seek himself a passage through the bleakest mountain
tracts across into the Engadine. And thus in the beginning of
September he reached Chur with a handful of followers.
The papal commands that the Hohenstaufen should every
where be supported and received with honour began now to
take effect in German territory. The Bishop of Chur received
the traveller most hospitably and himself escorted him to St.
Gall, where the Abbot of St. Gall and the Advocate of Pfaffers
brought the strength of the Kong's forces up to some 300
horsemen. With this force Frederick hastened on to Constance.
Once again his luck held ; a few hours decided his fate and the
Empire's.
While he was riding full speed for Constance his enemy
Kaiser Otto was already encamped at tJberlingen on the
northern shore of the lake. During the last few months Otto
had to a very large extent re-established his power in Germany,
and when he heard of Frederick's coming he hastened south to
meet the Staufen on his first arrival. He was just about to
cross over to Constance ; his servants had arrived there, his
cooks were already busily preparing his imperial dinner, the
town was arranging a reception for him. Suddenly, instead
of the expected Otto, Frederick stood before their gates and
demanded admission. The Bishop, who was prepared to
welcome Otto, at first refused to receive Frederick. Everything
was at stake. The papal legate, Archbishop Berard of Ban,
who accompanied the King, rehearsed the Pope's excommuni
cation of Kaiser Otto ; the Bishop gave way, not without mis
giving, and accorded to the Hohenstaufen entrance into the
town, already lavishly decorated in honour of his rivaL Hastily
they fortified the bridge over the Rhine on the tJberlingen road.
Three hours later the Emperor Otto stood without the closed
gates of Constance. He had arrived with weak forces and scanty
"THE CHILD FROM APULIA" 59
retinue and could not risk a battle. " Had Frederick reached
Constance three hours later," so they say, " he would never
have been successful in Germany."
The news of the miraculous appearance of the Hohenstaufen
spread like wildfire. Frederick's success was manifestly a sign,
an act of God : his following grew hourly. Within a few
days all the nobles and princes of the Upper Rhine jubilantly
embraced his cause, castles and strongholds and towns were
illuminated. When he rode into Basel a week later it was with
a royal retinue. The Bishops of Chur and Constance, the
Abbots of Reichenau and St. Gall, the Counts Ulrich of Kiburg
and Rudolf of Hapsburg with many others joined the cortege
that had at the beginning been so modest, and in Basel the
Bishop of Strasburg brought him 500 troopers. The King of
Bohemia's ambassador petitioned the seventeen-year old mon
arch for the confirmation of his master's crown. Fortunate
and victorious, Frederick could now afford to forget the help
lessness of his childhood and the Welf-persecutions of his
boyhood. He was in any case precociously mature, and now in
a night, not in a dream, like the heroes of romance, but in an
almost dream-like reality, he had won the security of a young
conqueror, though people still styled him " the child," " the
Child from Apulia."
The possession of Basel and Constance gave him a firm
footing. Kaiser Otto tried to bar the Rhine valley against him
by investing Breisach, but Frederick did not need to take up
arms against him in person. The Saxons had made themselves
unpopular in the south by many a deed of tyranny, and the
embittered Breisachers, hearing of Frederick's approach to their
relief, vigorously took up their own defence and frightened off
the Emperor and his troops. Otto was deserted by numbers of
his followers and fled to Hagenau, whence he was ejected by
Frederick's cousin, the Duke of Lorraine. The Welf was
unable to rally himself and his forces till he reached Cologne on
the lower Rhine, which had formerly acclaimed him. The
whole upper valley of the Rhine was thus in Staufen hands.
This valley had been the scene not long before of the Children's
Crusade, when hordes of boys and girls, seized with a blind
enthusiasm and passionate fanaticism had poured into Italy
60 THE BEGGAR PRINCE
ii
from the countries by the Rhine. People had gazed in deep
depression at this hapless procession of ill-starred youngsters,
moving to inevitable destruction . . . the more gladly did they
now greet the festive progress of the Hohenstaufen boy.
He was hailed with matchless enthusiasm as German King
as he slowly moved downstream through the decorated
Rhenish towns. He traversed Alsace, " most well-beloved of
our hereditary lands " he called it, and was met everywhere by
cries of joy as the populace escorted him and his ever- swelling
multitudes in unbroken triumph through the valleys of the
Rhine. An Italian had said : " it is a joy merely to gaze on
the handsome Hohenstaufen boy/' and the people of the upper
Rhine felt this still more strongly. In the driest and most
meagre chronicles you can read between the lines the sympathy
and joy of the writer in the young King's success, whose first
easy victory stood out like a miracle.
Even the outward circumstances of , his surprising rise to
power seemed like the fulfilment of well-known legends and
fairy-tales : the Beggar Prince knocking at the gate of Constance,
finding the dinner laid for another, and winning the Empire in a
couple of hours — these were episodes familiar in story, which
yet in everyday life seemed strangely remote and far away. And
thus a touch of glamour lingered round the boy, and the Germans
seemed to feel a breath of Sicilian air and the dream atmosphere
of childhood enveloping him. His appearance too — so homely
in spite of its foreignness — marked him as one of their own
people. Just so must Duke Ernest of Swabia have looked long
ago, the songs of whose wonder journeys were now beginning
to be heard, set to the tune intended for Frederick. People
rarely called him by his name or title ; to all he was " the
Apulian Lad," " the Child of Pulle," or just " Our Boy," and
decades afterwards the chroniclers still added to the mighty
Emperor's name, as if it were a cognomen, the title Puer Aputiae.
As the chosen of the Pope a further peculiar glory surrounded
him, and the simple people who were accustomed to view
temporal events in the light of spiritual imagery, celebrated in
their Staufen hero the victory of the eternal CHILD, who with
invisible weapons overthrows the mighty. The Pope himself,
finding the Goliath story apt to existing circumstance, had sent
FREDERICK'S LIBERALITY 61
the boy forth as his " David " against the giant Welf. And the
people interpreted the victory in similar vein : one writer
represents the Welf as a species of monster creeping off to its
distant lair before the face of the Apulian child. Another said :
" The child has conquered the Welf with heavenly rather than
with earthly might," and yet another speaks of the " wise child
of Apulia." " Behold the power of the child " sang one of the
troubadours, and a rhymed chronicle in kindred mood sum
marises :
Now comes the Pulian Child along —
The Kaiser's sword is twice as strong,
Whom yet the Child did overthrow
Without a single swordsman's blow :
The people's love towards him did flow . . .
About this time, or it may have been a few years later, the
troubadour, Aimeric of Peguilain, at the court of the Margrave
of Montferrat, maintained that till he had witnessed the deeds
of Frederick he had never been able to believe in the exploits
of Alexander : for the Staufen, the " Physician of Salerno/*
had raised Generosity from her sick bed. The troubadours
praised other qualities of Frederick's also — the freshness of
his youth — his jpie de more — his beauty — for he fulfilled the
Minnesangers' ideal of a king — his medium height (for
" moderation " was valued above all) — his golden hair ; but
nothing was lauded so highly as his " graciousness," of which
the Macedonian king had also been a pattern. Openhanded-
ness as a royal virtue was a relic of the heathen streak that
coloured the ethics of the troubadours. For the true medieval
Christian — in the absence of a Bible parallel — knew nothing of
liberalitas, whether as an expression of overflowing joy in life
or of humane intent, but reverenced only caritas indulged for
the soul's salvation. Since Hohenstaufen days Generosity
belonged once more to the make-up of the perfect king, and
when Frederick in the very first document written on German
soil thus expressed himself : " Kingly dignity is enhanced by
openhandedness, and prestige loses nothing by the giving of
gifts," this saying of his tallied word for word with many a
verse of Minnesang.
Frederick II acted only, as he frequently asserted, "accordingto
62 FREDERICK'S POPULARITY
ii
common royal custom on the one hand, and on the other accord
ing to a certain magnanimity peculiarly his own." Thus the poets
praised especially his innata liber alitas , even when in later days
for grave reasons of state he was least able to display it towards
the troubadours. Just now, however, he had scarcely set foot
in Germany than his " graciousness " bordered on prodigality.
In the first intoxication of success the young prince gave with
both hands ancestral estates and imperial property to all who
crowded round him, and when resources failed him for the nonce
he promised gifts for the day " when with God's help he would
have wealth again." When money came his way he handed
it over forthwith to his hangers-on. The ambassadors of the
French King who in the first weeks brought him a very consider
able sum of money must have been more than a little surprised
when the Chancellor asked where the money was to be kept
and received for answer : " Neither this nor any other money
is to be kept at all ; it is to be distributed amongst the princes."
" When people heard of this high-hearted generosity of the
King a universal shout of jubilation was raised in his favour "
— " all were bound to him and he became dear to all by his
liberality " — such is the unanimous verdict of the chroniclers.
The Puer Apuliae knew exactly what he was doing, and the
means by which he could secure the adherence of the ever-
hungry counts and princes. The gesture of openhandedness
perhaps came natural to him, but he was by no means unaware
of the contrast it would point between him and the notoriously
parsimonious Welf. He declared himself: "Wisdom coun
selled it, and it gives us advantage in men's minds over our foe
who acts in other manner and thus brings down on his own head
the hatred of men and the displeasure of heaven."
In a few weeks Frederick was master of the whole of the south
of Germany from Burgundy to Bohemia without exertion and
without a blow. His debt to Pope Innocent was immeasurable,
and it has justly been pointed out that his progress had hitherto
lain through lands predominantly belonging to the Church.
Chur, Constance, Basel and Strasburg were all bishop's seats,
as indeed was almost the whole plain of the upper Rhine. Next
to the Pope's the French King's help had been of most value,
and he was to get further assistance from the same quarter.
DEC. 1212 CORONATION IN MAINZ 63
In November 1212 Frederick met the French heir to the
throne in Vaucouleurs near Toul and was reported to have had
a narrow escape from the daggers of Otto's assassins. He
concluded an alliance with the French against England, binding
himself not to make peace with the foe without the consent of
France. In these early years Frederick was wholly dependent
on the powers that had helped to raise him, and was particularly
bound to Philip Augustus who espoused his cause, a trifle too
warmly perhaps. A certain arrogance was noticeable on the
French side, as for instance when a French vassal swore to his
king to support him and the Hohenstaufen Frederick, and, in
the case of the latter's death, the feudal oath ran on, " whomso
ever the electors might, with the approval of the King of France,
choose for Roman Emperor." As France supported the Hohen
staufen, England backed the Welf, and so the day was coming
when — sign of the appalling disintegration of Germany — the
imperial throne would be the stake in a war between England
and France. French envoys were present when Frederick II
on the 5th of December, 1212, was once more formally elected
King at a great assembly of princes in Frankfurt, and four days
later at his coronation in Mainz. He was crowned it is true
with imitation regalia, for the Welf had possession of the real
ones, and not in Aix la Chapelle which was for the moment held
by Kaiser Otto and his minions.
There was yet no open fighting between the two opponents.
Otto was busy with haphazard little feuds in his native Saxony
and Thuringia along the lower Rhine, and Frederick had not
yet mustered an army. To gather forces, and at the same time
to show himself to his vassals in the various provinces and
receive their homage, Frederick held a series of royal courts :
one in Ratisbon for Bavaria and Bohemia, one in Constance
for Swabia. Much as Frederick owed to the Pope and to the
King of France it was clear that in the south of Germany, and
above all in Swabia, other and mighty influences were at work
helping him to victory. The populace hailed him as their
hereditary Lord, their Hohenstaufen. His enemy had set ugly
tales in circulation : he was no son of Henry's but the bastard
of some papal official; just such a tale as had been circulated
at the time of his birth and was to crop up again not infrequently .
64 THE HOHENSTAUFEN LEGEND n
How the mere sight of him sufficed to quench all such gossip
is best told in the words of the chronicler : " While now these
fateful chatterings began to fly from lip to lip, lo, on a sudden,
there appears amidst his Swabians, Bavarians and Bohemians,
the young King as conqueror over his foes , and proves the nobility
of his race by the courtesy and dignity of his behaviour." Here
he was hailed therefore as the legitimate heir, entering the
kingdom of his fathers, by birth the lord of Swabia, whose due
succession as Duke had been recognised by the Swabian
monasteries immediately on the murder of Philip. People
recalled once more that long ago in the lifetime of Henry VI
Frederick had been elected King, and that only his youth, his
absence, and the wiles of others had kept him from his throne,
and they maintained that the imperial crown was the preroga
tive of a Hohenstaufen. For, they told each other, there was
only one imperial race, one regia stzrps that begot Emperors,
the race of the Waiblings which reckoned doubly royal blood,
the Carolingian and the Salian, and through the latter traced its
descent from Troy. The Staufen ancestor had, at God's
express command, wedded a Waibling maid, and Barbarossa
had been justified in his boast that he sprang from the regia
sttrps Waiblingensium. All this contributed not a little to the
glorification of the last of the Hohenstaufens whom people had
fetched home from Sicily.
Had not the Heruli of old — as with amazement the Byzan
tines related — sent out messengers to Ultima Thule to spy out
the land and see whether a scion of their ancient royal house
might there be found ? And had not the Heruli also — weary
of waiting for their messengers' return — chosen themselves a
new king whom, however, they stealthily forsook by night when
the news came that their envoys were on the way bringing
their hereditary prince. Not otherwise had it been in Swabia.
Kaiser Otto had returned in haste from Italy and by his friends'
advice had hastily married the Staufen heiress Beatrice, to
whom he was long since betrothed, and had hoped thereby to
secure the loyalty of Bavarian and Swabian warriors. But his
young bride died shortly after, and almost simultaneously the
news came that the last of the Hohenstaufens was coming home.
By night his men of war crept off and returned to their home-
OTTO THE WELF 65
steads, leaving bag and baggage in Otto's hands. For in these
regions none loved " the Saxon " as they always called the Welf.
Frederick's life was to be rich in wars against almost all the
powers. It is significant that his career begins with the renewal
of a prehistoric racial feud. The boy had scarcely yet had time
to make enemies of his own, but Otto the Welf, who from birth,
as son of an Englishwoman, seemed destined for the most
northern throne in Europe as King of the Scots, as the Staufen
was born to a southern crown, seemed expressly created by fate
to be the antithesis in every detail of his Waibling rival : even
in his exterior. The Welf, heroic to foolhardiness, was a fear
less dashing knight, unwontedly tall, with powerful frame and
well-proportioned limbs. His strength lay in his mighty fist,
trusting to which he bore himself with aggressive arrogance,
" like a lion whose very voice inspires terror in all around."
Not many years before Frederick's tour of his Swabian duke
dom Kaiser Otto had visited the country in his royal progress.
Swabia in those days centred round the Lake of Constance in
the west and stretched far beyond the Rhine, embracing the
whole of Alsace and reaching southward across the Alps almost
to Lake Como. It was the oldest Roman settlement in Germany
and as such tended to turn its gaze southward as of course.
Throughout this Swabia then, Otto of Brunswick remained " the
Stranger," " the Saxon." True, the Welfs were Swabian too
by origin, and not until after the fall of Henry the Lion, Otto's
great state-founding father, had they been restricted to Bruns
wick. Kaiser Otto in filial piety had made a pilgrimage to
those spots of Swabia that were dear to his house : Augsburg
for instance and the monastery of Weingarten, but he had spent
his boyhood at the English court of his uncle, Richard Coeur de
Lion, and had become estranged from the land of his forebears.
He displays many an English trait : a frugality bordering on
parsimony, which Walther held up to scorn — " If he had been
as generous as he was long, he would have had many virtues "
— an amazing lack of education, a poverty of intellect. How
could such a boor hold his own in the delicate play of intrigue
of the Roman Curia or prove a match for the great Pope
66 DEATH OF OTTO n
Innocent. He moves us almost to pity as we see him powerless
in the grip of forces which he did not even understand, ignorant
and unsuspecting in the toils of fate : not even rightly aware
what goal he sought or ought to seek. Not until the storm had
broken was he aware of its approach, and then he was bewildered
by it—perplexus, as the chronicler has it. The impact broke
him, instead of lending him fresh impetus.
By his own behaviour Otto wantonly squandered the attach
ment of people of all ranks, certainly in the South. Towards
the princes he showed himself inopportunely stern, arrogant,
unjust. He embittered the lower clergy by the favouritism
which awarded rich livings to Englishmen and Saxons instead
of to the Swabian candidates ; he irritated the higher ranks
by his lack of courtesy, addressing them all as shavelings or
priestlings. In short, by the multiplication of almost negligible
trifles he unnecessarily queered his own pitch. Even when his
edicts were wise and just, his unhappy touch prevented his
winning affection by his righteousness. His excommunication
was hailed with malicious delight by all who boasted "a different
standard of manners." " A burden to the Italians, a worse
burden to the Swabians, unpopular amongst his own," such was
the judgment of the South on the Welf Emperor whose brusquerie
was a symptom of self-distrust rather than of legitimate pride.
For this son of Anak lacked that genuinely royal dignity which
enabled Barbarossa without losing prestige to kneel before the
mightiest of his own vassals. Otto's feudal pride which only
force could bend turned all too easily into its opposite. A
cruel Nemesis awaited him. He was barely thirty-six when he
died a gruesome death at the Harzburg : deposed, dethroned, he
was flung full length on the ground by the Abbot, confessing his
sins, while the reluctant priests beat him bloodily to death with
rods. Such was the end of the first and last Welf Emperor.
The times were growing too intellectual and clearsighted for
a mere champion, however lion-hearted, to rule the Holy
Roman Empire. The ancient myth appointed to the two races
their two tasks with a merciless exactitude : the Welfs, though
mighty and great their Dukes, for ever vassals ; the Waiblings for
ever Emperors. For there was room in the Waibling state for
giants who preserved the might and prowess of ancient heroes,
DOOM OF THE WELFS 67
but never in a Welf state would there be mental room for Waib-
ling brains. The relationship had held since Carolingian
times, even since the Wanderings of the Peoples. Again and
yet again the Welfs had tried to break the evil spell, again and
yet again had met the inexorable doom : the pride of the
rebellious vassal had ended in ruin and a lonely death.
A breath of mystery and horror surrounds these luckless
Welfs, like the atmosphere of northern myth : Ethico, one of
the first of them, vanished full of sorrow into bleak mountain
fastnesses when his son — unknown to the father — had fulfilled
his fate and done homage to the Waibling emperor of the Franks
. . . Henry the Proud after fighting long and vainly against his
Staufen foe died suddenly as victory lay within his grasp. . . .
Henry the Lion fell and was banished . . . Otto, the only Welf
who reigned as Emperor — not by any means the greatest of
his race — seemed to have belied the fateful prophecy, seemed
about to found a Welf Empire of the North — which would
assuredly have met a warm welcome from the Pope — and paid
the penalty of his trespass into the Hohenstaufen empire with
this shameful, grisly death. Perhaps we should add to the
series that uncrowned founder of a northern kingdom, the
lonely fallen vassal in the Saxon forest, Bismarck, the most
sublime of all these giants, who stands in fate so near the Welfs.
It is easy to understand why the Church took the Welfs under
her wing — her short flirtation with the Sicilian boy was acci
dental — she wanted as her " Sword " a docile warrior-giant,
not an intellectual Emperor. Danger lurked in the free,
independent, unclerical mind of the Hohenstaufen.
It was the famous duel between Otto and Frederick —
extreme types of the two races — that gave Italy the two party
battle-cries that echo for centuries through her history : Welf
and Waibling, Guelf and Ghibelline. It was no chance that
allied Guelfdom and Popedom. For in the thirteenth century the
Ghibelline spirit stood for that secular and intellectual light that
often bordered on heresy, and which, even when it found room
for itself within the Church, was yet able to take a detached view
of the Church from outside and see it as a whole. Boccaccio
said of Dante that he would have been ill able to create his
work had he not been a Ghibelline. The first appearance of the
68 GUELF AND GHIBELLINE n
two cries as party names would seem to have been in Florence
on the occasion of the Amidei-Buondelmonti wedding in 1216
when the family feud developed into party strife. The Buon-
delmonti party called themselves Guelfs, as supporters of
the Emperor, the Amidei dubbed themselves Ghibelline after
the rival King. The papal and imperial element had not yet
entered in (at that moment the papal would have been the
Ghibelline). Later, under the empire of Frederick, Ghibelline
became synonymous with the imperial, and Guelf with the
papal party.
The struggle between Welf and Hohenstaufen was felt in all
directions beyond the borders of Germany, not alone in Italy.
England and France were intimately involved by the alliance
of Kaiser Otto with King John and of Frederick with Philip
Augustus. For these two western powers the German succession
was only an episode in their everlasting weary quarrellings, but
for Otto, who had little chance of winning the day against
Frederick on German soil, the interference of these powers
offered a hope of success. The Welf rightly reckoned that any
English victory over France would at least seriously damage the
Hohenstaufen's uncertain position in South Germany and might
even completely undermine it. A simultaneous English- Welf
attack on France was therefore planned. Philip Augustus's
position was precarious. In the spring of 1214 the English king
landed at La Rochelle, and simultaneously Otto, in alliance with
the Duke of Brabant, invaded France from the north-east.
Frederick had waged an unsuccessful campaign against Qued-
linburg in the preceding year, and at Easter in 1214 he availed
himself of a Diet which he held at Coblenz to summon the
South German army to a concerted attack on the lower Rhine,
and thus, by diverting Kaiser Otto's attention, relieve the
pressure on his French ally. But fate forestalled him. He
had no need to take a hand in the French-English- Welf
campaign, he had only to garner the fruits of a French victory.
The French heir apparent inflicted a crushing defeat on King
John in Poitou and Philip Augustus made short work of the
hostile coalition. On the 2yth of July, 1214, the memorable
battle of Bouvines was fought which decided the fate of three
countries.
JULY 1214
BATTLE OF BOUVINES
69
Victorious France, whose oriflamme was the rallying point
of the levies from the various towns, kid the foundation of her
internal unity. John's defeat furnished the opportunity for
the English barons to rise against the King and wring from him
THE BATTLE OF BOUVINES, 1214
the great charter of liberty, the " Magna Charta " of 1215.
And Germany displayed for the first time in the arena of
European politics her complete internal disintegration. The
Empire, for one short brilliant moment, was to enjoy unity
under this great Hohenstaufen, who received from the hand of
France the golden eagle wrenched from the defeated Otto, but
70 THE GOLDEN BULL OF EGER n
the clear-sighted Philip Augustus had not failed to note — and
repair — its broken wings. " From this time forward the fame
of the Germans sank ever lower amongst foreigners " reports a
chronicler. Kaiser Otto never recovered from this defeat :
the trifling campaigns which Frederick undertook against him,
now here, now there, finally in alliance with the king of Den
mark, are without interest or significance.
Philip Augustus and Frederick II were not the only victors
of Bouvines. Pope Innocent made a third. The promises
and assurances of his ward matured for him, now that Frederick
had the power to redeem them. Innocent had not lent his
potent aid gratis. Six months after Frederick's arrival in
Germany, as he celebrated Whitsuntide at Eger, he had sur
rendered, with the concurrence of the numerous princes there
assembled, valuable privileges and territories. He secured to
the Pope the internal Church powers he sought, he handed over
the disputed domains of Central Italy which Otto had conceded
before his coronation. For Frederick could ill refuse to his
" Benefactor and Protector " — as he now styled him — what his
rival predecessor had accorded. The weighty thing was that
the famous Golden Bull of Eger, which the German Church
delivered to the Pope, took the form — at the express wish of the
Curia — of an imperial grant, not of a personal promise. The
princes as a body, and each prince individually, had to counter
sign and confirm it. For the personal promises of one — though
he were an Emperor — gave inadequate security, as the Pope had
learned from his experience with Kaiser Otto.
The papal power was slowing mounting by such successes to
its zenith. Like every great ruler Innocent III craved to give
himself and the world a visible sign of his greatness. No more
impressive demonstration could have been devised than the
great Church Council which he convened for 1215 at the
Lateran. It was to be the biggest Council that ever Pope had
held since the Church had come to birth. And Innocent saw
with satisfaction representatives of the whole of Christendom
pouring into Rome and rallying round him, the Vicegerent of
the one true God : 71 archbishops with the patriarchs of
JULY 1216 DEATH OF INNOCENT III 71
Jerusalem and Constantinople, over 400 bishops, 800 abbots,
and the envoys of unnumbered princes and towns, with the
ambassadors of almost every western king. Otto the Welf had
sent his messenger ; Frederick II was represented by the
Archbishop Berard of Palermo : the Council was to decide the
question of the German succession. On the whole nothing
could be expected from its decision but the deposition of the
Welf Emperor — a decision immediately favourable to Frederick
II. But a precedent fraught with omen : the deposition of a
Roman Emperor by a Church Council.
The remaining decisions of the Lateran Council concerned
matters of internal ecclesiastical discipline. Pope Innocent did
not live to see them carried out. Within a few months of this
triumph, in July 1216, he died, at the age of fifty-six, in Perugia.
And men remembered that he had opened the Council with the
prophetic scriptural words : " With desire I have desired to eat
this passover with you before I suffer." Under the protection
of this mighty Pope the two greatest men of the immediate
future had been reared : Francis of Assisi and Frederick IL
Before the Council met in the palace of the Lateran the
cause of the Hohenstaufen had triumphed, and Frederick had
performed a most valuable service for the Church, which the
Pope, however, sedulously ignored. The Pope had devoted
all his energies during the last year of his life to the promotion
of a new Crusade, which should be this time the work not of a
secular power but of the Church Militant. Innocent had even
toyed with the idea of placing himself as the verus imperator
at its head. Encyclicals had been despatched to the whole
Christian world, and preachers of the Cross had been appointed
for each diocese to fan to fresh flame the fire kindled in German
bosoms by St. Bernard. Signs from heaven accompanied the
steps of the preachers and encouraged the waverers, as the
Pope's heralds journeyed to towns and villages and hamlets.
But enthusiasm flagged, fanaticism had faded to lukewarmness,
damped not a little by the fiasco of the Children's Crusade.
Still, a few of the princes, like the Duke of Bavaria, had taken
the Cross, when Frederick II in the spring of 1215 was preparing
72 ENTRY INTO AIX n
for the campaign to Aix and to Cologne. For when he had
marched along the lower Rhine after Bouvines he had not
ventured to attack Cologne even with his considerable army, and
he had made a fruitless attempt on Aix. His only success had
been in winning over Otto's ally, the Duke of Brabant. So in
May at Andernach he decided on a new Rhine campaign.
But in July, just as he was about to quit Alsace, the situation on
the lower Rhine suddenly cleared up. The citizens of Aix
themselves drove out the governor, and they now invited the
Hohenstaufen to come in peace and permit them to receive him
as their lawful lord.
So in the last days of July 1215 Frederick made his triumphal
entry into the sacred Roman town, not with the clash of weapons
but with all the pomp of a Roman emperor coming to be
crowned, escorted by princes and nobles in gorgeous array.
Frederick called Aix " the capital and seat of the kingdom of
Germany," and praised it beyond all other towns, " because in
this town the Roman kings are sanctified and crowned and it
shines out in glory second only to Rome herself." No German
king in those days could claim his full rights or his title to the
imperial crown of Rome till he had been anointed and crowned
in Aix and had taken his seat on the throne of Charlemagne.
Frederick, indeed, himself reckoned the years of his reign from
the day of his coronation in Aix. Other solemnities took place
during the coronation days. Fifty years before, in 1165,
Barbarossa, though then under the ban of the Church, had
disinterred the bones of Charlemagne, and in the presence of
bishops and princes had had them consecrated by the — also
banned — imperial Anti-Pope of the day " to the honour and
glory of Christ and the strengthening of the Roman Empire."
Barbarossa hoped by thus canonising the first Christian German
Imperator to sanctify also the sacrum imperium (in Charle
magne's own phrase) of the said empire and the office of emperor
itself, just as he had previously emphasised the biblical sanctity
of kingship by transferring the relics of the Three Holy Kings
from Milan to Cologne. In Barbarossa 's time the solemn
sequence had been composed in honour of Charles and his
capital, whose words of praise rang, full alike of challenge and
of promise, in the ears of Barbarossa y$ son :
AET. 21 FREDERICK TAKES THE CROSS 73
Hie est Christi miles fortis,
Hie invictae dux cohortis,
as he entered the great cathedral to lay to rest the remains of
the first German Emperor.
The people of Aix had wrought a magnificent silver shrine
the sides of which were adorned with figures of the Emperors,
like images of the apostles. The apostolic duty of converting
the heathen was part of the imperial office. Frederick II was
represented on the shrine, which was to be closed in his presence.
The day after his coronation the young King flung off his heavy
robe, climbed the scaffolding which bore the shrine and with
his own hand drove the first nails into the lid. No wonder that
Frederick's mind was filled in those days, as never before or
after, with visions of Charlemagne, Destroyer of the Heathen,
and of the aged Barbarossa, his grandfather, who lost his life
on a Crusade. He solemnly declared that it appeared to him
" both reasonable and seemly to follow the example of the
Great and Holy Charles and of his other ancestors.'1 The deed
had in fact preceded these words, for immediately on receiving
the Diadem with which Sigfrid, Archbishop of Mainz, had
crowned him, Frederick had suddenly, to the amazement of
the onlookers, taken the Cross, and by fervent prayers and
exhortations, reinforced by promises and gifts, had eagerly
recruited the knights and princes for the new Crusade. Many
of the princes followed the King's example. Frederick spent
the whole of the next day from early morning till night listening
to Crusade sermons in the cathedral, and persuaded many to pin
the token of the Cross upon their shoulders.
Did people hope that the boy, so recently compared to King
David, would really lead the hosts to David's royal city of
Jerusalem ? Frederick himself had every hope of it. It was
an almost inspired masterstroke of diplomacy that prompted
the young King to set himself at the head of the crusading
movement. Unwittingly he thus took the leadership and
direction of the Crusade out of the hands of the papal Imperator
and took up again the noblest task of an Emperor — by common
consent the imperial prerogative — to lead the knights of
Christendom to the Holy Land. Pope Innocent was most
painfully disturbed by this inopportune zeal on the part of his
74 THE CRUSADER'S VOW
quondam ward and made no single allusion to Frederick's
act. This wise political move was, however, only the inevitable
outcome of the mental attitude of the man and the king, and it
would be cynical to let its shrewdness blind us to the unique
greatness of that moment. It is a scene that lives : the proud
impetuous boy in the full flush of his amazing triumph and
success, immediately after the Coronation Mass, when he has
but just received the imperial diadem, dedicating himself in
the noble enthusiasm of youth to the service of God and of the
Empire with his crusader's vow. Frederick knew and felt the
act as a sacrifice, a surrender of himself to his ofGce and his
calling : " With pure and spotless heart he had not only
dedicated his body and his powers to God, but offered them up
in the devouring flame, as it were a holocaust." Vow and
consecration followed. The young Hohenstaufen is now
twenty-one years old. With his coronation and his sacrifice
the years of his boyhood had ended, the Puer Apuliae is
no more.
III. EARLY STATESMANSHIP
Death of Otto Dawn of national consciousness in
Germany Knight and Monk The Cistercians
The Templars The Teutonic Order : Hermann of
Salza War with Denmark The Golden Bull of
Rimini, 1226 Pope Honorius III King Henry-
elected King of the Romans Diplomatic victory over
the Papacy Coronation in Rome ; ceremonial
De resignandis privileges The Sicilian barons Diet
of Capua Count of Molise Deportation of people of
Celano Remodelling of the Feudal System Archi
tecture Diet of Messina, 1221 Syracuse Mea
sures against foreign trade Creation of Sicilian fleet
Saracen war Lucera University of Naples
Crusading disasters ; San Germano Death of Con
stance of Aragon, 1222 Marriage with Isabella of
Jerusalem, 1225 Birth of Conrad Berard of Palermo
Lombard League Feud of Cremona and Milan
Franciscans and Dominicans Diet of Cremona
prevented by Lombards, 1226 Leonardo of Pisa
t. Francis Death of Honorius III Gregory IX
III. EARLY STATESMANSHIP
A SERIES of uneventful, though not inactive, years followed in
Germany the exuberance of Frederick's youthful debut. He
had solemnly dedicated himself to the Empire and indicated
thereby the direction his future thought and activity would take.
Anyone who was looking for spectacular effects, however, must
have been disappointed in the new King's methods. It would
be wearisome and purposeless to recount in detail the history
of the next few years. Squabbles and differences with the Duke
of Lorraine, with a certain Egeno of Urach about some ques
tions of inheritance arising from the dying out of the Zahringen
— these and similar trifles — are irrelevant to the tasks and duties
of an Emperor, and have, as purely internal German affairs, no
interest beyond their own narrow borders. Even the Welf
struggle, which had at one point been a matter of European
importance with world principles at stake, had sunk to the level
of a casual feud, since Otto IV had abandoned Cologne and
the lower Rhine and retreated into his Brunswick domains.
Frederick attacked him again in the summer of 1217, but it was
scarcely necessary, for no one now seriously questioned the
Hohenstaufen rule. Nevertheless Otto's death at the Harzburg
in May 1218 cleared up the general situation and brought a
certain feeling of relief to Frederick. It was a remarkable co
incidence that — so at least the legend runs — just a few days
before the death of the Welf Goliath, the Hohenstaufen King
stood godfather to a boy who was destined in Germany's
darkest hour to rescue the remains of the shattered Empire and
to restore some fraction of the old pomp and glory to his ancient
house : Rudolf of Hapsburg.
The only events of these days were insignificant feuds whose
origin and name are alike forgotten : more or less important
diets accompanying the King's presence in various parts of his
dominions, weddings, awards, gifts, confirmations of title, arbi
trations — all the routine attaching to the daily duty of a king.
77
78 FREDERICK AND THE PRINCES m
Frederick's favourite residence in those days was in Alsace,
on the Rhine at Worms or Speyer. He had the body of the
murdered Philip of Swabia brought from Bamberg and buried
in the cathedral of Speyer beside the Hohenstaufen matron
Beatrice, Barbarossa's consort. His other favourite German
headquarters was Hagenau, where he could hunt in the exten
sive forests and yet slake his thirst for knowledge in the rich
library of ancient manuscripts. He was also often to be found
in Franconia and Swabia, in Wiirzburg and Nuremberg, in
Augsburg and Ulm, and business took him now and then to
Thuringia, Saxony and Lorraine, so that he acquired a wide
knowledge of Germany.
These have been called his " Wanderjahre "; their impor
tance lies less in what he achieved than in the goal he set him
self. We know nothing of his personal self-education in those
days. He was fortunate enough not to feel the need of an
amateurish search for suitable mental food that drove Napoleon,
for instance, at the corresponding age, to writing philosophical
essays. He was perfectly clear in his own mind what he wanted
— hesitation indeed never haunted him — and we can accept as
correct his own later statement that from his earliest youth he
had kept before him one lofty aim : to devote himself unre
servedly, body and soul, to the exaltation of the Roman Empire.
He therefore directed his policy solely with an eye to the Empire
as a whole : a whole of which Germany was merely one im
portant constituent. This is the key to his German policy :
he took a passive line towards the German princes, interfered as
little as possible, and surrendered one royal right after another,
looking only to the good of the Empire. The princes, for the
most part, were supremely indifferent to the wider imperial
issues, and Frederick II sought at any cost to secure their
loyalty and attach them to himself in order to divert at least a
fraction of their vigour to his task.
Frederick's position towards the princes was a peculiarly
delicate one. To maintain his rights, let alone seek to enlarge
them, that is : to attempt to rule himself, without the mediation
of the princes of the Empire, could only have been achieved in
battle against them. Never would they have voluntarily con
sented to any curtailment of their independence or of the rights
GERMAN POLICY 79
they had won during the long wars of succession. But these
were the very men who had summoned Frederick to Germany,
by whose aid he had overcome the Welf. Moreover, the most
numerous amongst them, as well as the most powerful, were
spiritual princes who had given him their help as the protege
of the Pope. Any step of Frederick against the princes would
infallibly embroil him with the Church, the other power to
which he owed his elevation. Such measures were not to be
thought of ; he who had come as a beggar to Germany was in
no position to exercise compulsion or persuasion on its princes.
His enfeebled Swabian dukedom did not of itself offer sufficient
resources to embark on a fight against the whole body of
German princes. Even if Frederick had wanted to confine his
activities to Germany, and to build up a strong, national German
kingdom, no opportunity for this was offered him. This par
ticular ambition was in any case foreign to the philosophy of
his race with its leaning towards the universal. Moreover, he
was himself a Sicilian as well as a Hohenstaufen.
We have various indications that Frederick's one instinct was
to shelve for the moment the miscellaneous German problems
— which finally stirred him to unconcealed annoyance — even at
the cost of surrendering many a privilege. By the indirect
expedient of building up a powerful Roman empire, rather than
by civil war, Frederick hoped to strengthen the royal power in
Germany.
So during these German years Frederick systematically
sought out and turned to account whatever benefited the
Roman Empire, whatever he could find in Germany that would
be valid or valuable in a wider world and not only within the
frontiers of Germany. He exploited not German peculiarities
but German world forces, and these, hi addition to serving the
Empire, brought advantage to the incoherent loosely-knit Ger
many herself. The only way to consolidate Germany was first
to extend it until it embraced enough material to weld into a
compact whole. As yet no German spirit existed, but only a
Roman spirit which was gradually civilising the Germanic. It
was not common German tradition which bound the Nor
therners together, but Roman form and culture. The German
races had nothing in common but their blood, and the call
8o THE HOHENSTAUFEN AGE m
of the blood was rarely vocal. Just now and then, on some
auspicious occasion, in solemn moments of enthusiasm, when
they assembled for crusade or pilgrimage, they felt with a thrill
of pride that they — Saxons and Franks, Swabians and Bavarians
— were one. But they did not even then feel " German." At
most they felt that they stood together as heirs of the Empire
of the Caesars, they prided themselves on being descendants of
the Trojans, or styled themselves " Roman " citizens. The
word " German " is reserved for our use to-day.
Frederick therefore in seeking out whatever struck him as
most " Roman " in Empire and Church was also fostering whatT
ever was most nearly " national." Awakening Germany offered
scope enough in the dawn of the thirteenth century when she
welcomed in her young king, the Child of Apulia, the personi
fication of her own youth. For in that wonderful Hohen-
staufen age, warmed through and through by southern light,
Germany was experiencing within her borders for the first time
(and for the only time in any such many-sidedness) a real blos
soming of song and vision, of fairy tale and epic, of painting,
building and sculpture. Despite world wars and political tension
she was displaying that cheerful serenity, that emancipation and
freedom which breathes from the creations of the time — almost
incredible as German products. The existence of these works
is the justification of Nietzsche's statement made at a time when
freedom had reached its nadir : " There is a touch of something
in them that might almost be Hellenic, which awakes in contact
with the South." This fertilisation by the South did not neces
sarily entail a journey thither. The spirit can modify the
climate, and by the spirit of the Roman Empire and the Roman
Church Germany was southernised as far up as her Baltic coasts.
Not that the essentially Germanic was surrendered or elimi
nated. These southern forces absorbed, without excluding, all
that was most characteristic, as the thirteenth century, the most
Roman century, abundantly proves. For all the Middle High
German heroic epics took their final form in the Hohenstaufen
period : the Nibelungen, Gudrun, the cycle of Dietrich of Bern,
with the Rose Garden of Worms, Laurin, the Battle of Ravenna
THE GERMAN SPIRIT 81
and Hugdietrich. Further, the epics of Duke Ernest and Ortnit,
these and others belong to this period. Side by side with the
great epic monuments — echoes of the Germanic heroic age —
we find the stirring new lyrics of the courtly Minnesanger,
Hartmann of Aue, Henry of Veldeke, Gottfried von Strassburg,
Wolfram von Eschenbach, and Walther von der Vogelweide,
whose voices blended with the solemn Latin hymns of the
Christian ritual. The chivalrous epics of the Minnesanger,
the Eneide, Poor Henry, Tristan, Parzival show the complete
blending of heroic tale and Christian spirit. It was the Roman
Imperium which imposed a sure, cultivated touch alike on
German heroics and on Christian chivalry — the like of which
Germany has never seen again.
We recall Bishop Conrad of Hildesheim writing of the marvels
of South Italy : " We do not need to go beyond the borders of
our own German Empire to see all that the Roman poets have
been at such pains to describe/'
Throughout the length and breadth of the Roman Empire
the German felt at home, and on a sudden the Roman poets
made a direct and personal appeal, and were no longer only the
cultural and educational stock-in-trade of the Roman Church.
The effective assimilation of such Roman spoils is shown by
the now repeated attempt to translate a Roman poet into
German — the first since Notker's Vergil in Carolingian times.
Albert of Halberstadt translated Ovid — he did not find a suc
cessor till the days of the Humanists — and proved that at the
time an interest in classical literature was beginning to be felt
in circles not conversant with classical Latin, probably amongst
those knightly laymen in the entourage of the Landgrave
Hermann of Thuringia at whose instance the translation was
undertaken. The Hohenstaufen were also responsible for the
introduction of Roman Law, the most vital and permanent
invasion of the Roman spirit into secular Germany.
The most remarkable manifestation of the German-Roman-
Antique time — felt to be " most strange " — was the architecture
of Bamberg, followed by Naumburg, ih which for the first time
a real German figure was portrayed. The surprising and
stimulating thing about the plastic art which belongs to the
later days of Frederick, the Sicilian-Italian Hohenstaufen, is
82 KNIGHT AND MONK in
this, that in works like the " Horseman " of Bamberg or Mag
deburg the possibility is for the first time revealed — not yet in
song or story, 'but to the eye in chiselled stone — of a work
showing a German subject and yet making a world-wide appeal.
This intermingling of the music and motion of Germany with
(imperial and papal) Rome has produced as by a miracle an
almost Mediterranean type, restrained, yet withal free and
unfettered, a type hitherto foreign to German art, for which
until then only the Italian had had an eye. The Bamberg
master worked of course under French influence and the
tradition of ancient Roman plastic art, but while this fact is
not without importance it does not alter the certain inference
that this nobly beautiful and chivalrous human type must have
existed in the Germany of the day.
Two figures of aristocratic life gave tone to the whole period
and gave Germany a share in the happenings of the world out
side : knight and monk. These were cosmopolitan figures and
German figures both. The monk exercised so dangerous a
monopoly in Germany that no other characteristic type was
developed on at all an equal footing. France on her side, since
the days of Erigena, Ivo and Abelard, in the schools of Paris,
Chartres and Orleans, produced the scholar ; Italy by the com
merce of the coast towns, Pisa, Venice and Genoa, evolved the
merchant. For Germany all paths into the distance lay open
before the knight and the monk, the two visible representatives
of the two great powers : Empire and Church. Prince and
bishop were tied to their domains, but knight and monk, re
joicing in greater freedom of movement and more varied range
of activity, mirrored like them, on a smaller scale and a more
modest plane, the figures of Emperor and Pope.
This fact successfully solved a problem which had never
before been solved in German history : for the first time,
throughout all the many and diverse provinces of Germany, the
aristocratic youths who overflowed the monasteries and religious
foundations were offered a career which would be valid not only
within the narrow limits of their immediate homeland but in
the wider world beyond. It was the only time in history that
THE CISTERCIANS 83
the German became — in the best sense of the word — cosmo
politan. This prepared the ground for a great period of plastic
art which was, alas, abruptly terminated when the fall of the
Empire severed German knighthood from the rest of the world
and condemned it to blunt itself in bourgeois stupidity or to
seek service outside Germany in foreign pay.
There were two powers which Frederick courted during
those German years, and courted not in vain : a monks' and
a knights' Order. A few weeks after the coronation at Aix
his close association with the Cistercians was remarked. The
Order to which St. Bernard of Clairvaux belonged, in which at
that time " the Church of Christ had broken into bloom," had
not in fact been founded by St. Bernard himself, but the com
munity owed its importance to his zeal and fire. Like almost
all orders of the Roman Church it had its roots in the need to
reform abuses, and Bernard had emphasised the stern asceticism
and discipline of the Order, but these were balanced in the
doctor mellifluus by the passion of a great love. Hence Dante
chooses Bernard as his final guide to the Throne of God :
The Queen of Heaven, enthroned above,
Knowing my heart's devotion, will not fail,
For am I not her Bernard, her true love . . .
He was the first to breathe into the Order a passionate devotion
to the Virgin, just at the time the outer world was singing the
earliest lyrics of the troubadours. And he was the first also
who sanctified " the work of the chaste earth " and so gave a
new direction to monastic ambition, the combination of an
active with a contemplative life. " Free from earthly disturb
ance and earthly broils the Order enjoys earthly peace/' wrote
Frederick once, and so it was. The Order sought out the re
motest and quietest valleys for its settlements, and there set
up its monasteries and its extensive farm-steadings, its simple
churches, towerless and unadorned, bearing only, instead of
other decoration, the first rose blossoms of Burgundian Gothic.
Maulbronn and Ebrach are our witnesses for these early days
when the Grey Monks " lived amongst, but yet above, their
fellow-men."
The obligation to till the soil ensured the rapid geographical
extension of the Order. The Cistercians became a quiet, steady
84 ORGANISATION OF THE ORDER m
pioneer influence, cultivating the ancient tracts and opening
up new ones, especially for Germany. It was they who first
Christianised and colonised Prussia. The whole organisation
of their monasteries anticipated growth. There was never to
be more than one abbot and twelve brothers, with twelve lay
brothers, in one cloister. If the numbers grew beyond this,
the excess hived forth to seek a new abiding place. This self-
sufficing restriction of their numbers to the number of the
apostles was the origin of the innumerable daughter-establish
ments which were subordinate to the mother-cloisters, as they
in turn were related — like the branches of a genealogical tree —
to the parent settlement at Citeaux. Thus the cohesion of all
the monasteries was secured, and the Cistercians gradually grew
to form one single world-wide institution which never split
asunder. This organisation was without parallel, for with the
Benedictines each monastery was entirely independent of the
others.
The unity and the monarchic graduation of the whole Cis
tercian Order were still further developed. Once a year the
Abbots from each settlement from Syria to Sweden assembled
in a General Chapter. This statesmanlike assembly, which put
the resources of all at the disposition of each, breathed the same
spirit from southern Burgundy to Pomerania and Prussia, as the
Cistercian churches in the north-east of Germany (nearly all of
which date from the thirteenth century) clearly testify. This
centralisation was as much an innovation as the agriculture and
horticulture which the monks introduced into the newly opened
districts, in improving the tillage and domesticating wild crops.
These brothers, pushing ever forward, colonising the valleys
with their Virgin-led hosts, spreading the teaching of Christ
and ever planting daughter-settlements, evoked a late Christian
reflex of the ver sacrum of earlier times.
The Cistercian Order, with its landed properties, its disciplined
constitution, its immense extension, was the most patrician
of the monkish orders under the Hohenstaufen Empire and
the aristocratic medieval Church, contrasting with the plebeian
Mendicant Orders who were just then emerging, and who were
really at home only in the towns. The wide distribution and
the monarchic constitution of the Cistercians had the result
FREDERICK AND THE "GREY MONKS 85
that they were directly under the leaders of the Christian world ;
no territorial prince, no individual bishop appointed or in
fluenced the governors of their monasteries ; they were ruled
directly, in spiritual matters by the Pope, in worldly affairs by
the Emperor alone. Earlier Emperors had made generous gifts
to the Cistercians, but none to the same extent as Frederick II,
especially in those German years of his. The tokens of favour
with which he honoured the Order and at times almost over
whelmed it, are well-nigh innumerable. The warmth of feeling,
the reverence, which the records show he felt for the Order,
" the shady grove of Christ," exceed all that any other com
munity can boast, and till his dying day Frederick loved to
consider himself intimately bound to them.
After taking the Cross Frederick got himself received into a
prayer-community of Cistercians, and his curiously humble
petition addressed to the Abbot of this powerful Order is still
reminiscent of his crusading mood. The pious and edifying
style of this letter — in which Frederick pictures himself as a
sinner in the weakness of the flesh — served its purpose. He
was received into the community, a fact of which in later years
he did not fail to take advantage. This sort of thing was
of course a regular custom of the Emperors, and Frederick II
followed in their footsteps the more readily that he was anxious
to secure adherents in the clerical camp. The Cistercians were
to act as " Preservers of the harmony between Emperor and
Pope/3 a scheme which had often proved fruitful under Bar-
barossa and Otto IV. But Frederick had yet another axe to
grind. Their experience made the Cistercians masters of
agriculture. Caesarius of Heisterbach, himself a Cistercian
monk, proudly records that the lay brothers of the grey brother
hood had been recommended to the Archbishop of Cologne
as the best household administrators. Frederick could turn
such men as that to good account. He loved to gather round
him Cistercian lay brothers trained in agriculture and cattle-
breeding and set them to organise and administer his imperial
estates in Apulia and the Capitanata. He used others as archi
tects and overseers for his castles and pleasure palaces, while
in his most important and handsome buildings in South Italy
Cistercian builders played a distinguished part.
86 CISTERCIAN ARCHITECTURE m
We have written evidence of the Cistercians' activities as the
Emperor's builders. It is clear from a statute of the General
Chapter that lay brothers and monks were later told off in great
numbers for the Emperor's service. The Pope even complained
that Frederick was using too many of them for his building
projects. The evidence of the Apulian castles and palaces
themselves is plainer still. As far as can still be traced they
all have in common the new Gothic style of the Cistercians
which was supplanting more and more the native Nornian-
Byzantine architecture. Not of course the " broken forms " of
later Gothic, but the principle of utilising piers and buttresses
to denote strength and striving — just what makes the magic of
the transition period. The late-Roman forms are touched and
penetrated by the young Gothic strength, so that for a few
decades of conflict and exuberant wealth the two — both fruit
and blossom — are found side by side. It was in such a " ful
ness of time " that Frederick was destined to rule.
People have designated the whole Hohenstaufen culture of
Germany as " knightly," and knightly too the crude early-
Gothic of the Cistercian monasteries. There was something
of the knight in these monks, and indeed in the days of the
knightly orders the antithesis between monk and knight was
almost obliterated. The epic poet — by a slight anachronism —
makes the monk Ilsan, who in the suite of Dietrich of Bern
burst so devastatingly into the Rose Garden of Worms, a
Cistercian. The connection between the Grey Monks and the
spiritual knights goes back in fact to very early times. People
even say that the first knightly Order of the West was founded
by Spanish Cistercians who courageously flew to arms when
Calatrava was threatened by the Moors. And the interplay of
the two types of Order can be easily explained, for the spiritual
knight, like the monk, loved to trace his origin back to St.
Bernard. It may not be strictly true that — as the legend will
have it — Bernard himself dictated the Rule of the Templars to
the knights Hugo of Payens and Godfrey of St. Omer, but the
original spirit of the Templars was closely akin to the spirit
of romantic devotion and stern sobriety which animated St.
Bernard and his Order. It was Bernard who, in the time of
the second Crusade, recruited with zeal and eloquence for the
ST. BERNARD AND THE TEMPLARS 87
Templars, and who wrote a tract, " In Praise of the New
Chivalry of Christ " : " These warriors are gentler than lambs
and fiercer than lions, wedding the mildness of the monk to the
valour of the knight, so that it is difficult to decide which to
call them : men who adorn the Temple of Solomon with
weapons instead of gems, with shields instead of crowns of gold,
with saddles and bridles instead of candelabra ; eager for vic
tory not for fame ; for battle not for pomp ; who abhor useless
speech, unnecessary action, unmeasured laughter, gossip and
chatter as they despise all vain things : who in spite of their
being many live in one house according to one rule, with one
soul and one heart."
St. Bernard, when he pointed the Templars to a spiritual life,
as he had the Cistercians to an active life, had really the same,
or a very similar picture of an ideal community in mind, but
while he recommended to the monks the honourable and self-
denying service of the Queen of Heaven, the Order of Templars
was dedicated to the service of Christ himself, for whom the
brothers bore in common their strife and suffering ; the Saviour
himself was the spiritual head of their State.
People have often exalted St. Bernard because of his miracles.
Not the least of these was the foundation of the first knightly
Order. What a revolution was there ! The restless , vacillating
secular knight errant, who flew from adventure to adventure,
or sacrificed himself in the service of his lady-love, leading his
own individual life and entirely destructive to the firm fabric
of the State, was thus induced to fit himself into the strict bonds
of the Order, to give a social value, instead of a personal value,
to his battles, to seek the inspiration of his noblest deeds not
from his mistress but from God himself, under whose law and
in whose service the Order fought.
For the first time in post- Christian days warriors and men
of the vita activa, not merely monks, banded themselves to
gether for an idea, and for a spiritual Lord, and assimilated
themselves to each other. Uniformitas was the principle, the
final keynote of the German knightly orders, emphasised again
and again, and extending far beyond the mere question of dress
— the mantle with the cross. The Templar, serving like the
monks a common master, evolved that virile, knightly, rigorous
88 THE TEUTONIC ORDER m
constitution which later statesmen inevitably took as their
model, developing it each in his own way for his own material
advantage and placing himself in the place of the transcendental
Master. One of such earthly state knighthoods is the Teutonic
Order, founded a bare century after the Templars, which
devoted its powers solely to the terrestrial state.
The feeling for spiritual knighthood was almost extinct in
the East, when at the turn of the twelfth-thirteenth century in
Acre the nursing community of the German Knights of St.
Mary bound themselves into a third spiritual Order beside the
Templars. The Templars were mainly French, and the Knights
of St. John were largely English and Italian. Pope Innocent III
gave to the Teutonic Knights the Rule of the Templars, whom
they were to emulate in everything spiritual and knightly as
they were to emulate the Knights of St. John in care for the
poor and the sick. The Order was to be strictly national ; only
knights of German birth were to enter it.
The story of the new Order is much tamer than that of the
Templars. Its origin, lacking the blessing of St. Bernard, lacks
fire and inevitability ; its battles lack the glamour of the distant
East ; its end the mystery of early death which always over
takes the heroes of myth. The German Knights never enjoyed
such lavish wealth, their temptations were not so great, they
never sank into the same corruption, but never did they inspire
tale or legend with the glory and mystery that surround the
heroes of the Temple, the secret guardians of the Grail. The
history of the Teutonic Order, however, is all the more real
because it was neither born in myth nor buried in mystery,
and because its battles were fought on familiar fields near
home. When Frederick II came to Germany the Teutonic
Order was still an insignificant body. Henry VI had turned
his attention to them while he was planning the Crusade, but,
in spite of many benefactions, the confusion that followed
his death hampered this purely German movement in its
development.
The Church and older rivals looked at it with no friendly
eye, and its real prosperity began with Frederick II. After he
had taken his crusading vow a definite opportunity presented
itself for the employment of the Teutonic Knights, and Frederick
FREDERICK AND THE TEUTONIC KNIGHTS 89
at once got into touch with them. Numerous gifts in this and
the ensuing years bear witness to Frederick's determination to
strengthen the Order by every means in his power. He even
granted its members privileges which encroached on his own
imperial rights, or which robbed him of considerable royal
revenues. He was here even more open-handed than towards
the princes. He had at first primarily the Crusade in view, but
beyond the needs of the moment Frederick sought to enlist
their enthusiasm and their strength for other tasks. He created
out of them a little corps d* elite, free from feudal fetters and
extraneous influences whether of temporal or spiritual lords,
independent, reliable, unconditionally loyal to himself — a small
body, but one immediately at the service of the Empire as
sword and weapon, and in spiritual matters subject to the Pope
alone. To increase the authority of the Order in Church affairs
Frederick applied personally to the Pope, with the result that
the notaries in the papal Chancery were busy night and day pre
paring nothing but charters for the — hitherto sorely neglected —
Order of Teutonic Knights.
In other ways, too, Frederick always showed a great affection
for the Teutonic Knights. He encouraged and assisted young
noblemen like the three Hohenlohe brothers who were seeking
admission to the Order, just as later he did his best to dissuade
young noblemen from joining the Mendicant Orders. In the
early days especially, when he wanted probity and trustworthi
ness, he turned to the Teutonic Knights : whether to oversee
the building of his ships or to carry important despatches. In
the Holy Land he hardly employed any others, and in later
years he entrusted the administration of Alsace to Berthold of
Tannenrode, one of the brethren, and even placed the German
regent for a while to a large extent under the influence of the
Teutonic Knights, so that a chronicler was not unjustified
in exclaiming that the whole Empire is ruled according to the
counsels of the Order. He was overstating the case of course,
but it is remarkable how much attention Frederick devoted to
attaching the Order to himself. One of the first privileges
accorded to them was that the Grand Master of the day, who
ever he might be, when attending court, should form part of
the royal household and belong to ihefamilia, while his escort
90 HERMANN OF SALZA m
also should enjoy the hospitality of the court. Further, two
brethren of the Order were to be in permanent attendance on
the royal person. The Spanish king Alfonso VIII had shown
similar favours to the Order of Calatrava, but this only goes to
show that these knightly orders, in proportion as they became
national institutions, tended to become " courtly." It is com
mon knowledge that the knightly orders of the late Middle
Ages, the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, were purely court
affairs, and preserved an aristocratic form of life that had
perished elsewhere.
Frederick liked to attribute to the earlier Hohenstaufen,
indeed to Barbarossa himself, the founding of the Teutonic
Order, so as to lend age and dignity to the institution. He also
liked to talk of it as his own creation. It was in fact the work
of his own hands, his and the first great Grand Master's:
Hermann of Salza. For over twenty years Hermann of Salza
was always to be met in Frederick's court and camp, his most
trusted counsellor, his most valued intimate, not in virtue of
his office as Master, but on account of personal qualities which
made him practically indispensable.
It seems probable that Hermann of Salza was a Thuringian
and there is something Thuringian in his whole personality.
He was dignified and thoughtful by nature, and he possessed
in every department of life that manliness, righteousness and
good faith which distinguished the Order that he ruled. His
faithfulness had become proverbial ; it was with him no passive
virtue but — as from the dawn of time you find it only in
Germans — a positive driving force. There is something almost
tragic in this great man's fate. For Hermann of Salza had two
masters ; he had sworn an oath of fealty to both Pope and
Emperor, and every conflict between them exposed him to an
intolerable strain. So we see him, bent on keeping faith with
both, flying hither and thither from court to Curia, and from
Curia to court, again and again during those years of incessant
quarrelling seeking to keep or to restore the peace. He once
described his life work as " to strive for the honour of Church
and Empire," and when the breach between the two powers
became final and complete, life became for him impossible.
On Palm Sunday 1239 Frederick II was excommunicated for
1226 WAR WITH DENMARK 91
ever, and on the same day the great Grand Master, Hermann
of Salza, breathed his last.
Amongst Frederick's courtiers the distinctly older Master
represented at all times the calm, practical wisdom which
more than once deterred the hot-headed young monarch from
wantonly provoking his foes. Hermann of Salza 's long experi
ence had made him acquainted with the state of affairs in the
East no less than in Italy, hi the papal Curia no less than in the
German court, and this experience combined with most un
usual diplomatic and political skill gave him a unique value in
every branch of imperial policy. The collaboration of Frederick
with the Grand Master, whom he met for the first time in the
Nuremberg court of 1216, had most significance for north-east
Germany.
Frederick had been — to quote a Livonian chronicler — " so
deeply preoccupied with the varied and lofty duties of the
Empire " that, truth to tell, he had felt scant interest in the
affairs of north-east Germany. With Hermann of Salza it was
different. The politics of his Order had a very lively concern
with the north-east, and so it came about that all important
matters concerning regions round the Baltic Sea from Denmark
to Livonia passed through his hands or were confirmed by
him.
Waldemar, King of the Danes, was a man of some impor
tance ; he had extended his rule — at the expense of the Empire
— along the Baltic towards Livonia and Esthonia, as far as the
mouth of the Dvina. Finally he was taken prisoner by a
vassal of the Empire, and the envoy whom Frederick sent to
treat with him was Hermann of Salza. He concluded peace
with the Danish king, and in 1226 — probably at the Grand
Master's instance — Frederick created Liibeck, the most im
portant port on the Baltic, an imperial town, thus putting an
end to all Danish rights over the Elbe country and to all claims
of the Roman Curia which stood behind Denmark. Hermann
of Salza called the Emperor's attention to Prussia also, where
the Roman Curia with the aid of the Cistercians had been
founding colonies and missions.
GOLDEN BULL OF RIMINI
in
We may here anticipate the events of the ensuing year. In
the winter of 1225-26 Conrad of Masovia, Duke of Poland,
finding himself unable to repulse the Prussian heathen, applied
to the Teutonic Knights for help, and provisionally gave a verbal
promise — not yet confirmed in writing — to hand over his terri
tories of Kulm to the Order in return for their services. This
offer came at an opportune moment, for the Order had just
been unsuccessful in a somewhat similar enterprise in the
Burzen country of Hungary.
30
Scale of Mies
o so 100 200
THE BIRTH OF PRUSSIA
1226
With wisdom and foresight and a fortunate appreciation of
the whole situation the Grand Master took up the scheme,
talked it over with Kaiser Frederick, who at once gave it firm
and final shape by granting weighty privileges to the under
taking. So thoroughly had they thought matters out that the
memorable Golden Bull of Rimini of 1226 lays down the future
tasks and aims of the Teutonic Order, draws up the constitution
of the future State in a scheme complete down to minutest
details. All this is in order before negotiations have begun,
before an agreement has been reached with the Polish Duke,
FOUNDATIONS OF PRUSSIA 93
before a single Teutonic knight has set foot or eye upon the land
of Kulm. This great charter that founded the Prussian State
under the Order of the Teutonic Knights has justly been called
a " plan of campaign," for the territories granted by it to the
Order had still to be won, and the Order therefore knew for
years ahead just where its duty lay. This Charter indeed
secured the future of the Teutonic Order : it was so compre
hensive that whatever the Order did was done under the special
aegis of the Emperor and was covered by imperial privilege.
It is expressly laid down in this document that " all gifts and
conquests are to be the free property of the Order, which is to
exercise full territorial rights and be responsible to none. The
Grand Master is to enjoy all the privileges that pertain to a
prince of the Empire, including all royal privileges, and the
Order shall be hi Prussia free from all imperial taxes, burdens
and services." Thus Frederick permitted the Order to found
an autonomous State, owning no territorial master save the
Order itself, "to be an integral part of the monarchy of the
Empire " as the Charter says. This position of the Order was
assured not only by earlier privileges granted under the im
mediate protection of the Empire, but by a most remarkable
attitude taken up by Frederick.
Since the days of Charlemagne the warfare against the
heathen had been one of the tasks of a Roman Emperor, and
Charlemagne had demonstrated that it must be waged in two
directions : first, against Islam, as in his Spanish campaign, and,
secondly, against the heathen of eastern Europe as in his Saxon
wars. The Crusades had concentrated attention on the war
with Islam, but the other task had lost its full importance after
the time of Barbarossa but was not yet quite forgotten.
Frederick II revived this East European mission.
The Empire had been chosen by God to preach the gospel.
This was Frederick's conviction, frequently reiterated ; he
found room to incorporate it in the Charter of the Order:
" For this end has God uplifted our Empire above the kingdoms
of the earth, and extended the limits of our power beyond the
various zones, that our care may be to glorify his name and
diligently to spread his faith among the peoples, for he hath
chosen the Roman Empire for the preaching of his gospel : let
94 CONQUEST AND CONVERSION m
us therefore bend our minds to the conquest, no less than the
conversion, of the heathen peoples. ..."
These sentences contain an unmistakable challenge to the
Pope. For the Church, with the help of the Cistercians, had
already begun to christianise Prussia, and there was a very real
danger that Prussia might become a feudal appanage of the
Roman Curia as Sicily had done, though it was the Normans
who had won it from the infidel. The Pope indeed had signal
ised his intentions, styling the conversion of the heathen as
" emancipation/' since the new converts were to " owe obed
ience to none save Christ and the Roman Church " — not,
therefore, to the Empire. As a counter-move Frederick now
came on the scene with his theory of an imperial mission and
spoke expressly of " conquest J> as the goal — indicating an
intention of ruling the heathen peoples. He incorporated the
land belonging to the Teutonic Order in the " monarchy of
the Empire," and supported this line of action by reference
to an old royal right. Heathen land was lordless land and
thus belonged, not to the conqueror, but to the ruler, to
the Emperor who, like the Pope, was here the vicegerent
of Christ. Thus Frederick planned to save Prussia for the
Empire.
The importance of this plantation of the Teutonic Knights in
Prussia needs no emphasis. The spiritual Order had thereby
acquired, as it were, a physical body ; it had exchanged land
less ubiquity for territorial possession, and it quickly metamor
phosed itself into a real state which preserved the standards
and ideals of chivalry through days when these elsewhere were
being degraded or urbanised. It is highly characteristic of
Frederick that he thus founded the Prussian State more or less
fortuitously. We shall observe again and again, what we here
note for the first time, that his hand possessed some magic, as
people later contended, that brought life into whatever he hap
pened even accidentally to touch. Things forthwith assumed
an importance he could not possibly have foreseen, out of all
proportion to the slight effort he had expended. The Charter
of the Order, the Golden Bull of Rimini, which was drawn up
more or less casually in a busy moment when the Emperor was
occupied with innumerable more important questions, is a
FREDERICK AND THE TOWNS 95
proof of his happy touch. The godfather of the Hapsburg was
the godfather also of Prussia.
The Order of the Cistercians and the Order of the Teutonic
Knights were the two most weighty allies that Frederick won
during his German years ; nothing else approaches them in
importance. The power of the German towns was still slight ;
moreover, the princely towns and the episcopal towns were
wholly outside his influence, and privileges which he granted
now and then to one or another — Cambrai and Basel for in
stance — might have to be revoked if the imperial princes so
decided. For the body of princes were swift to resent any
encroachment and acted together as one man to resist any
interference with their rights. Only the Swabian towns and
those immediately under the Empire were under Frederick's
care, and here he bestirred himself to improve communications,
to secure safe convoy for the merchants throughout the Roman
Empire, and to protect the highways against robbers, measures
which were much appreciated.
Apart from what he actually did for them, Frederick contrived
to inspire his towns with the faith that he had their interests
peculiarly at heart, and he strengthened this belief by gifts and
privileges. He turned villages into towns, presented towns
with market-places, gathered scattered rights and privileges
into one charter which formed a code of justice for the town.
Later, when the days of tribulation came, it was the towns
who rallied to the cause of the Hohenstaufen and of the
Empire against the princes.
The laborious methods of natural cultivation practised in
Germany made it an unsuitable sphere for the wonderful ex
periments in state agriculture which Frederick later made so
brilliant a success in Sicily, and the German feudal system
permitted no direct interference in administration. Frederick's
strength was frittered away in handling all the various minor
internal affairs of Germany without any visible advantage to
the whole, and soon after his coronation at Aix he seems to have
aimed at evolving some scheme for delegating minor German
business to others, retaining the decision only in major matters.
" Wherever the Roman Empire and some of the princes meet —
there is Germany " became the dictum, showing that the whole
96 HONORIUS III m
Imperium — not only the countries north of the Alps — could be
German through the German Imperator.
Many adjustments were gradually made to organise a sub
sidiary government for internal German affairs so as to set the
Emperor free for larger issues. Frederick never hustled. All
his big undertakings can be traced back through years of quiet
preparation, and he never sought to conceal what he was aiming
at. What he did, he did corampublico, and he always announced
beforehand what his intentions were. Yet his actions always
contained an element of suddenness and surprise, either because
no one had taken him seriously, or because he carried out his
intention at a moment when people had ceased to expect it.
His first great diplomatic victory over the Church exemplifies
this.
Honorius III had been since 1216 the occupant of the papal
throne. Whoever had succeeded Innocent III would neces
sarily have appeared something of a pigmy by comparison;
certainly Honorius did. He was a jurist, primarily an adminis
trative official. Cencio Savelli had been, before his elevation,
the Pope's Chamberlain, and had edited the famous "liber
censuum" the tax-book of the Roman Church. Later, when the
battle between the Emperor and Pope had become an economic
one, the fact that the Church could take the field as a first-class
financial power was due in no small measure to Honorius.
For the rest he was old and frail, and inclined therefore to be
placable and gentle rather than bellicose, though he asserted
on occasion the lofty claims which were nowadays part and
parcel of the Papacy. If the peace of the world were to depend
on a balance between these two great forces Honorius was the
very best make-weight for Frederick, and for a good ten years
the two held the balance fairly even. The most absorbing
affair which in those days engrossed the two heads of Christen
dom was unquestionably the Crusade, and Honorius regarded
the recapture of Jerusalem as the loftiest and most personal
ambition of his pontificate.
Frederick's assumption of the Cross had at first awakened
little enthusiasm in Rome. Innocent, who had been planning
to march into the Holy Land at the head of the peoples, com
pletely ignored Frederick's action, and without consulting his
AN ABORTIVE CRUSADE 97
youthful rival fixed the day of the start of the Crusaders for
ist July, 1217— a date which completely ruled Frederick out,
for Otto IV was still alive and the Hohenstaufen could not
possibly leave Germany.
Honorius III seemed at first oblivious of Frederick's existence
as a Crusader, and a legate of the Pope's directed the arrange
ments for the Crusade as an exclusively papal affair. The first
rendezvous of the warriors was not to be the Holy Land but
Egypt' by the conquest of which it was hoped to engineer the
fall of Jerusalem. The whole undertaking was badly organised
and sorely mismanaged. Damietta fell at the first onslaught,
but an ill-advised penetration into the interior brought the
entire crusading army into the greatest danger. When the
Crusaders began to feel the pinch they spontaneously turned
for help to Kaiser Frederick, and the Roman Curia suddenly
bethought itself that he too was a Crusader. Pope Honorius
took up the general cry and painted in the most glowing colours
the opportunity that now opened for Frederick to fulfil his vow,
and addressed him prophetically as " the victorious king before
whose countenance the heathen fly and who in fighting God's
battles wins his own eternal salvation."
Frederick, however, had not awaited the summons from the
Pope. He had already declared himself ready to promote the
cause of the Crusade in Germany, and to arrange the date of
departure at the Diet he was immediately about to hold. He
requested Honorius kindly to excommunicate dilatory Cru
saders, for if any delay occurred it would be due to the Roman
Curia and not to him. Further, would the Pope be so good
as to take the Empire under his protection during Frederick's
absence, and with it the imperial regent whom he was about
to appoint.
In the days of Innocent, Frederick had almost always styled
himself " King by the Grace of God and of the Pope." He
dropped the phrase in writing to Honorius ; it no longer fitted
the facts. He adopted in other ways also an entirely new tone
towards the Curia ; the note though perfectly courteous had in
it a ring of decision that must have quickened many an ear in
Rome. The Pope's need, however, was great. In spite of
reinforcements the position of the Crusaders before
98 THE SICILIAN QUESTION m
grew daily more critical, and Pope Honorius's one anxiety was
to send Frederick to their assistance with all speed. Francis of
Assisi had accompanied the forces to preach Christianity to the
Egyptian Sultan. Before finally setting out on the Crusade
the Staufen was to receive the imperial crown from the hands
of the Pope in Rome. And Honorius impatiently awaited the
moment. Though Frederick was no less eager, circumstances
compelled him to postpone his Roman journey and with it his
Crusade: from the Feast of St. John in 1219 the date was
changed to Michaelmas, and then to March 1220, then to May,
and finally adjourned sine die. The vow could not be wholly
cancelled without a dispensation from the Pope.
What was detaining Frederick in Germany ? Apart from
trifles he had much to arrange before he could leave Germany.
First, it was imperative to come to some understanding with the
Pope on the " Sicilian question " ; secondly, to arrange for the
administration during his absence ; thirdly, to secure the elec
tion of his son Henry as King of the Romans. In defiance of
the Pope's impatience Frederick made his Roman journey and
his Crusade contingent on these questions.
Pope Innocent III had strenuously sought to guard against
the danger of a union of the Empire and Sicily, and in pursuance
of this policy had demanded securities : Frederick's son Henry-
had been crowned King of Sicily at the express request of
Innocent. In several documents Frederick had recognised the
Church's feudal rights over Sicily, had solemnly undertaken not
to unite the kingdom with the Empire, had promised, on the day
of his coronation as Emperor, to waive his rights over Sicily
in favour of his son. During King Henry's minority a regent
jointly appointed by Pope and Emperor would rule the south
Italian kingdom.
The day of the Crusade and of the imperial coronation was
drawing on, and therewith the day on which Frederick must
formally renounce all claims to the government of Sicily . . .
but the Emperor, who had very definite views about his here
ditary kingdom, made no attempt to disguise from the Pope
that while recognising his own earlier renunciation of Sicily as
valid he intended to take over the regency himself. The Curia
was anything but satisfied. Frederick must renew all his earlier
FREDERICK'S HEIR 99
promises — this he did willingly enough. But he did not give
up his intention of ruling Sicily. His hereditary kingdom was
going to mean for him the beginning and the end of his Im-
perium. He must achieve his goal by an indirect route, and
the Curia in its excessive foresight had pointed out the way
when it had demanded the coronation of his infant son as King
of Sicily.
The other important matter that Frederick had to arrange
was the administration of Germany during his absence. A
complicated system was elaborated, but it was soon perfectly
clear what Frederick had in mind and was determined to
accomplish. Immediately after his coronation in Aix he had,
most naturally, sent for his Queen, Constance, and his little son
Henry to join him in Germany. In 1217 he installed the boy,
who was already Bang of Sicily, as Duke of Swabia; in 1219
he entrusted to him the regency over the Kingdom of Burgundy,
and since then he had been busily winning over the German
princes to the idea of electing Henry King of the Romans.
There was nothing unprecedented in all this, and the dangers
of a Crusade to which he was now about to expose himself gave
a sufficient colour to Frederick's desire. He wished during his
own lifetime to secure the succession to his house, as many
an Emperor before him had done. Technically, however,
Frederick was not yet Emperor, and difficulties confronted him
on every side. The important thing was first to get the princes
to agree to his plan, and his immediate efforts were directed to
that end.
Negotiations were being carried on at the turn of the year
1219-20 : first about the Crusade, then about the Roman
journey, thirdly about the Sicilian question, fourthly about the
German regency, fifthly about the election of the infant Staufen,
negotiations that were all interdependent and ought all to be
concluded in the shortest possible time. For matters were
nearing a crisis ; the Pope urged Frederick to hasten his de
parture and began to show ill-humour over his procrastinations,
while the longer the negotiations were drawn out the more
hopelessly the skein became entangled. All possibility of a
solution seemed past when Frederick finally succeeded with one
stroke in cutting all the knots. By weighty concessions and a
too HENRY, KING OF THE ROMANS m
fresh abandonment of many royal prerogatives he purchased
the acquiescence of the princes, and at the farewell Diet which
he held in Frankfurt on his departure for Rome in the spring
of 1 220 the Sicilian King Henry was elected King of the
Romans. Frederick had won the game. The Hohenstaufen
dynasty was established, the regency arranged for, and the
Sicilian question solved exactly as he had planned. Sicily had
of course not been legally incorporated in the Empire, the feudal
overlordship of the Church over Sicily still stood, but that per
sonal union of the two crowns which Frederick had had to
renounce on his coronation as Emperor became suddenly an
accomplished fact, when Henry, long since the crowned King
of Sicily, was elected King of the Romans by the German
princes. The personal union had come to life again without
any breach of all the treaties with the Pope, for they were all
made in the name of Frederick II, and contained not a syllable
about Henry. All the rights and powers which Frederick was
debarred by treaty and agreement from claiming for himself he
had now passed on boldly to his son. The one flaw in the
treaties had been exploited. For even if the Curia had insisted
on Henry taking the reins himself — at eight years old — his
father's " advisership " could not be prevented, which meant
that Frederick was himself the de facto ruler of the two realms
of Sicily and Germany. In short, from the papal point of view,
there would have been a perfectly futile insistence on mere
appearances if they had attempted to exclude Frederick from
Sicily.
The Roman Curia, though gravely annoyed, at once recog
nised the real state of affairs, and finally had to accept the fact
that the cherished parchments which Frederick had so recently
confirmed, and even added to, had become so much waste
paper. Frederick meantime had won his first great victory over
curial diplomacy. He had succeeded in uniting Sicily and the
Empire — in however roundabout a way. That union, to avoid
which Pope Innocent had literally set the whole world in motion,
had exalted and had debased the Welf, was now restored;
the States of the Church were again shut in on north and south.
The only difference was that Henry VI had never acknowledged
Sicily's feudal dependence on Rome, which Frederick II for the
FREDERICK'S DIPLOMACY 101
moment at least upheld, and once more confirmed in writing.
Nothing now stood in Frederick's way, and a few months later
he set out for Rome.
It was one of the most characteristic gifts of Frederick to win
a whole series of positions with one skilful move. He raised
it to a high art. His taking of the Cross at Aix was prophetic,
he now gave his first serious demonstration of this typical pro
cedure. Apart from the advantages already mentioned, King
Henry's election gave Frederick just the opportunity he wanted
to set up at the court of the young King of the Romans a sub
ordinate government which could deal with all the minor
questions of German internal administration. This was
arranged provisionally with a view to the Crusade and was
afterwards made permanent, so that henceforth Germany was
ruled by King Henry while the Emperor himself had his head
quarters in Italy, the centre of the world. All this followed
from the one well-judged manoeuvre.
The taking of the Cross in Aix had had far-reaching conse
quences in many directions, but it had been the outcome of
an almost delirious enthusiasm and it had nothing of the usual
transparency of the air of Frederick IFs court, in which men
far superior to their spiritual opponents played a subtle game
with gentle irony. The election of the Sicilian king was more
typical and showed the unstudied ease with which Frederick
met even the most complicated situations.
Frederick kept this light and happy touch in similar delicate
situations for years to come, and in spite of occasional ruthless-
ness, of occasional severe violence, he succeeded on the whole
with a minimum of actual force. To sever Gordian knots with
the sword was not his way — nor did he think it his mission ;
his great skill lay in allowing the loose threads to twist them
selves into a seemingly inextricable tangle, and then at the
decisive moment with firm hand and unerring eye to seize the
whole and secure it in a knot which only Alexander could have
cut in two. And in his day there was no Alexander.
In this connection Frederick's first victory over the Curia may
serve as something more than a sample, though he had not yet
reached the heights of later years. The Roman Curia had seen
plainly enough what he was aiming at. He had made no secret
loz FREDERICK'S PERSONALITY in
of the fact that he would have liked to retain Sicily. The Curia
knew that Frederick's son was to be chosen King in Germany
and had at once perceived all that this implied. None the less
they were entangled in Frederick's skilful web and were not
able to extricate themselves.
Frederick was able to preserve throughout an air of childlike
innocence, for it was not he but the princes who were respon
sible for this election of King Henry. The better to keep up
this convenient fiction the election was arranged to take place
in Frankfurt at a moment when Frederick happened to be
absent, so that he was able to maintain with perfect truth that
everything had taken place " without his knowledge and actually
during his absence." The Curia had probably foreseen the
issue, but had to confess that this German royal election was
none of her business. In the background Honorius had done
his best with the help of the spiritual princes to prevent the
election, and this accounted for the initial opposition Frederick
had met with. The Pope could not plausibly complain that
there had been any breach of previous agreements ; he could
only hope that the threatened fate might in some way be averted
after all.
Fate itself seemed to walk the earth incarnate in this Hohen-
staufen, not sinister or menacing but smiling, innocently playful,
with buoyant dancing step. In later years this fateful quality
assumed terrifying proportions, the smile became a cynical
witticism, the dance a dance of death. An atmosphere of
magic played round this Hohenstaufen, some wholly-German
Germanic emanation which Napoleon for instance con
spicuously lacked, an immeasurably dangerous emanation, as
of a Mephisto free of horn and cloven hoof, who moves among
men disguised as a golden-haired Apulian boy, winning his
bloodless victories with weapons stolen from the Gods. Already
without effort of his own the Puer Apuliae had played Nemesis
to a giant like Innocent III, till the most mighty opponent of a
Hohenstaufen dynasty became so mysteriously entangled in the
coils of fate that he had no option but to elevate to the throne
of the Roman Empire the Sicilian king whom he had failed
to crush.
It rounds off the picture of Frederick's German years that
SURRENDER OF PREROGATIVES 103
he paid for his victory over the Curia and for his Sicilian inheri
tance with a number of royal prerogatives and rights which he
lightheartedly abandoned to the German princes. The spiritual
princes had at first stood out against the election of Henry, but
when Frederick offered them the free testamentary disposal of
their wealth, rights of custom and coinage in the bishops' lands,
even the free disposal of the feudal fiefs in their domains ; when,
finally, he limited in their favour his own freedom by promising
that henceforth the ban of the Empire should automatically
follow the ban of the Church, they could resist no longer.
For such a bait they were ready to throw over the Pope and his
Sicilian policy. The royal rights were already subject to many
exceptional grants of privilege, so that Frederick's actual sur
renders were not so very serious. The gravity of the " Con
stitution in favour of the spiritual princes " was, that what had
been the exception now became the rule. Frederick has often
been reproached on account of these concessions, but the pos
session of Sicily weighed more with him, and most rightly, than
sundry royal prerogatives.
It might with equal or greater justice be cast in the princes'
teeth that their support for any cause, however great, could only
be won by bribes, and that they for the sake of a brewing tax
would follow their Emperor or betray him.
Frederick II could not play the statesman amid such con
ditions ; he needed raw material to work with and great foes
to fight ; perhaps he was not equal to these hucksterings. All
thought for princely greed and princely bickering he thankfully
handed over to the subordinate government which he set up,
and which during the minority of King Henry was in the first
place entrusted to Archbishop Engelbert of Cologne, who was
to be Germany's Gubernator. To himself he drew all the virile
manhood of Germany.
A topical poem of Walther von der Vogelweide's sketches
the position of the day with bitter irony and acumen. The
princes' delay in electing Henry was holding up Frederick's
departure for Rome and for the Holy Land. To influence the
election in the direction of Frederick's wishes Walther offers
104 FREDERICK AND THE MINNESANGER m
the princes a piece of advice ; they are at all times eager enough
" to be rid of the king"; he shows how, by merely electing
Henry, they will be able to despatch him " a thousand miles
and more away to Trani : "
Ye foes ! Just let him have his way and go,
Perhaps he thus will never vex you more !
If he dies there — which Heaven forfend — you score ;
If he return to us, his friends, the more
We praise the fate that doth our lord restore.
My plan will profit both the friend and foe.
Walther von der Vogelweide was in close touch with Frederick,
and the verses were intended to assist his plans. The poet at
length received " his fief," for which he had so long and vainly
petitioned Kaiser Otto. Thus Frederick attached the Minne-
sanger to his cause ; the best that Germany had was his. On
the whole, however, it was time for him to quit the North. The
same year found him in Sicily displaying his prowess and adding
a second more brilliant success to his first.
In August 1 220 he started out with a smallish force from
the Lechfeld at Augsburg, the usual rallying point for armies
marching to Italy, He was accompanied by Queen Constance
and a number of princes, chiefly those who like their King wore
the Crusaders' Cross. Slowly he marched southwards, follow
ing the Brenner Road that had seen so many German Emperors
march to Rome, past Innsbruck, Bozen, Trent — where eight
years before as an adventurer he had turned aside into the
pathless mountain tracts — and on to Verona.
He did not enter the town, but camped outside in tents during
those September days, beside the Lake of Garda, with his court.
The first letter that he wrote on Italian soil was addressed to
Pope Honorius, thanking him for all his kindness, and informing
him that the -writer had, for the good of his soul, submitted to
the penances prescribed by the Church and been freed from
the ban which might have fallen on him as a dilatory Crusader.
He had acted thus, he hastened to add, not because he felt him
self at fault, but solely to testify his reverence for Pope and
Church. He sent in advance his Court Chancellor and the
Archbishop Conrad of Metz as royal legates to see that all was
quiet in imperial Italy, a country always easily roused.
i2ao THE MARCH TO ROME 105
The towns of Lombardy had all recognised Frederick II,
even his hereditary enemy Milan. Nevertheless, the country
was seething with excitement, and people were just waiting in
momentary quiet to see which of the parties in upper Italy
Frederick would elect to join. A reputation for extraordinary
vigour, courage and shrewdness had preceded the King, spread
during the recent years by the songs of the troubadours, as they
travelled from court to court of the north Italian nobility.
They seem to have been a little disappointed when they saw
their future Emperor, for in spite of his six and twenty years
he still struck them as too boyish looking.
Frederick II most scrupulously avoided taking sides amongst
the towns, and even carried this reserve so far that on the whole
journey to Rome he never entered any town but always camped
outside. The only exception he made was in favour of Bologna,
famous for its Roman Law, and his retinue was presently in
creased by the addition of the famous lawyer Roffredo of Bene-
vento, who had formerly been a teacher of law at Bologna and
was now posted in Arezzo.
It was remarked that while Frederick, as was the Emperor's
custom on entering Italy, confirmed in their rights all the Italian
towns, he only confirmed such freedoms and privileges as they
enjoyed vis-d-vis the Empire, and no allusion was made to
Sicily. The Pope had not yet made an authoritative pro
nouncement about the crown of Sicily ; this served as a wel
come and valid excuse for Frederick II's careful reservation.
The truth was, however, that he was anxious not to part with
any of the privileges pertaining to his hereditary kingdom. The
Genoese were most bitterly disappointed over this, for their
envoys had hastened with high hopes to the royal camp at
Modena. Genoa, the town that had so warmly espoused
Frederick's cause on his journey to Germany, and had boasted
herself his " Gate of Empire " (Genoa — Janua), had been hoping
for favoured treatment in respect of Sicily. Frederick, how
ever, confirmed only her imperial rights, and announced that in
no circumstances would Sicilian concessions be made prior to
his arrival in the kingdom. What he was planning soon became
apparent.
Frederick had announced his approach to the Pope in the
106 FREDERICK AND PROVIDENCE m
early days of October, sending as ambassador — for the first time
—the Grand Master of the Teutonic Order, Hermann of Salza.
Travelling by the Via Flaminia across the Apennines, the King
followed at his leisure, and a month later when he drew near
Rome he received a counter-embassy from the Pope, who on
the eve of Frederick's coronation as Emperor was anxious
to receive final assurances: that the Imperium as such had
no claims at all on Sicily, that Sicily was exclusively the
hereditary possession of the Empress-Mother Constance,
that Frederick must instal no foreign officials in Sicily and
must employ a separate royal seal. All this suited Frederick
admirably. So long as Sicily was his, he was supremely
indifferent as to the precise legal phraseology under which
he possessed it. A far weightier point was that the Curia by
this agreement showed itself officially reconciled to the per
sonal union. A few other points in connection with the
Crusade were agreed on, and, finally, the date of the corona
tion was fixed for the 22nd of November, the last Sunday
before Advent.
The early days of his success were far behind, yet Frederick
constantly recalled them to the world's remembrance. Pro
vidence had preserved him through all the perils of his boyhood
that the tempests of the storm-tossed Empire might obey him.
He early conceived his personal fate to be under the immediate
law of a higher power, a point of view which later became of
immense importance. Earlier emperors had sought to base the
immediacy of their imperial office under God on theories and
doctrines of law — always disputed by the Popes from Gregory
VII onwards. Frederick seldom troubled to seek legal proofs.
With far greater effect he simply pointed to his own personal
good fortune, which marked him in the sight of all the world
as one chosen by the providence of God. It is true this did not
demonstrate the immediate derivation from God of the imperial
power in general, but all the more cogently that of the present
Emperor — which was vastly more to the point. For thus every
glorification of the Emperor's office became a glorification of
himself, and the general mission of the Empire became a personal
mission of just this particular Emperor, or, to use the phrase
which Frederick himself minted, " our unconquerable will
NOV. 1220 CORONATION IN ROME 107
became fused in the imperial dignity." Person and office began
to merge in one.
Frederick's assumption of the imperial dignity with all the
ancient ceremonial pomp was to be the closing scene of the
first act, the climax of these years of earliest successes. On
the great day Frederick rode with the Queen Constance from
the Monte Mario down into Rome along the ancient coronation
way, the Via Triumphalis. Halting at a little bridge outside
the town the future Emperor had to confirm the Roman people
in their lawful rights, and thereupon he received at the Porta
Collina, near the Baths of Diocletian, the homage of the clergy
of the city, who escorted him in solemn procession with censers
and crucifixes to the Church of St. Peter. Chamberlains scat
tering largesse paced ahead, and the praefectus urbi bearing the
sword. In the space before St. Peter's the escort was changed :
Roman Senators now strode on the King's right hand to take
his horse at the steps of the church. Meanwhile the Pope had
likewise issued in solemn procession from the Sacristy of St.
Peter and on the topmost stair awaited in state the arrival of
the King. On his right were the cardinals — bishops or priests
— on his left the cardinal-deacons, the remaining clergy on a
lower stair. The King with his retinue drew near. With
reverence Frederick kissed the Holy Father's feet and brought
him golden tribute as the vicegerent of Christ. Pope Honorius
received him graciously with kiss and embrace ; the King rose
again, and the Pope, with the King on his right hand, moved
towards the Chapel of Santa Maria in Turribus. Here Frede
rick was to take the oath : to be the defender and protector
of Pope and Church in every hour of weal or woe. While the
Pope proceeded to the altar to pray and then took his seat the
King remained behind to be received into the brotherhood of
the Canons of St. Peter.
In earlier days it had been the custom to receive the King at
his coronation into Holy Orders, and dress him in a priest's
robes. They made him a cleric of the Roman Church, for the
standpoint was that in spiritual things the Emperor " could not
be quite a layman." The course of history had found ex
pression in a change in the coronation ceremonial ; with the
growing power of an imperial Papacy the priestly prerogatives
io8 THE CEREMONIAL m
of the Emperor were very considerably weakened though not
quite eliminated.
The Emperor no longer .received a bishop's ring, he was no
longer anointed on the head but only on the arm and between
the shoulder blades ; no longer was chrism used for his anoint
ing, simple consecrated oil was considered good enough ; in
stead of the consecration as bishop there was substituted this
reception into the brotherhood of the Canons of St. Peter.
The ritual of prayer and litany remained nevertheless very
similar to a bishop's. Clad in the imperial vestments Frederick
now entered St. Peter's through the silver gate, where cardinals
met him with blessing and prayer. He halted to do reverence
at Peter's tomb and in front of the tomb of St. Maurice he was
anointed by a cardinal. Not till this was accomplished did he
advance to the altar of Peter to make confession and receive
from the Pope the kiss of peace. Then with his retinue he
sought his appointed place. The Pope rehearsed the prayer,
adding a special intercession for the King, whereupon Frede
rick approached the Pope to receive the insignia. The Pope
crowned him with mitre and with crown, and thereupon handed
him the sword which Frederick was lustily to brandish three
times to show that he was now a miles Beati Petri, after which
he received sceptre and imperial orb. The choir now burst
into song: "To Frederick ever glorious, of the Romans the
unconquered Emperor, be Life and Victory ! " The corona
tion of Queen Constance was completed in corresponding style.
High Mass followed, in which the Emperor, laying aside crown
and mantle, ministered as subdeacon to the Pope. Then he and
the Empress received the communion at the Pope's hands and
finally the papal kiss of peace. The Pope then pronounced the
blessing and with the Emperor quitted St. Peter's to mount his
horse outside the cathedral. Frederick held the Pope's stirrup
and led him a few paces forward before mounting his own white
horse. At Santa Maria Transpadina Pope and Emperor parted
after exchanging one more embrace, and Frederick returned to
his camp at Monte Mario.
At his coronation Emperor Frederick had once more taken
the Cross — from the hand of Cardinal Hugo of Ostia, later
Pope Gregory IX — and had promised to proceed to the Holy
RETURN TO SICILY 109
Land in August 1221. Further, he issued a number of new
laws : first and foremost an edict against heretics, and another
which laid down the indissoluble connection between the ban
of the Church and the ban of the Empire. Bologna was the only
one of the Italian towns which he had visited on his journey
south ; he now commanded the doctors and students of the
" Holy Laws " to enter his new coronation laws in the codices
of Roman Law and to incorporate them for ever in their teach
ing. The coronation laws were in fact embodied in the Corpus,
following immediately on the laws of Barbarossa ; Frederick and
his grandfather being the only two German Emperors whose
names are immortalised in Roman Law.
All the coronation solemnities and festivities went off without
disturbance — a very rare phenomenon. For there was usually
serious friction between the imperial troops and the citizens of
Rome. Barbarossa had had to be crowned in secret, and pitched
battles had accompanied the coronation of Otto IV, for both
of them had refused the usual largesse to the Romans. A
similar parsimony would have been wholly out. of character
in Frederick's case. Moreover, he considered himself as the
chosen of the Romans despatched by them to Germany to seek
his imperium. He had not less pride or independence than his
predecessors, but he scorned to raise a protest against stirrup-
ceremonies or coronation gifts or mere material costs. He
reserved his fighting powers for larger issues.
Immediately after the coronation Frederick turned to Sicily.
He felt the lure of Sicily partly because it was his home, but
even more because it offered to his hand the raw material for
his statesmanship. Here he could fashion what he would.
Germany had denied him all opportunity. Every step he took
in Germany had in one way or another to be accommodated to
the princes' wishes ; he could not stir a finger in any direction
without coming up against some constitutional obstacle. The
feudal system excluded all immediacy of the overlord. These
formalities and obstacles were deep-rooted in the customs of
centuries ; they could not be altered without immense revolu
tions. So Frederick could draw on the strength of Germany
no SICILIAN CHAOS m
only in a very limited degree ; her constitution, though any
thing but perfected, was too set and well established. She
could serve him only to the same extent and in the same manner
as she had served innumerable Emperors before him, but it
would be far too great a risk to depend on her alone for support
in any far-reaching measure.
Conditions in Sicily were more favourable. The Norman
kings had only held Sicily for two or three generations.
Frederick's grandfather, King Roger II, had wrought indeed
with great intensity and a wisdom and statesmanship amount
ing to genius, but all that he had built up had been shattered
beyond recognition in nearly thirty years of uninterrupted war
and strife. During Frederick's childhood it had been the scene
of anarchy and confusion. After his long absence Frederick
found now the same picture of woeful ruin and neglect that he
had left behind him. Chaos reigned in Sicily, but chaos preg
nant with possibilities of every kind. Everything was in move
ment, and for decades all the various forces of the known world
had tossed and tumbled there. The real statesman can only
reach his full stature in fluid circumstances — all great men have
needed revolutions — and this very chaos offered the most
favourable possible conditions without the fear of organised
opposition. Another point: for an Emperor who wished
effectively to play the Roman Imperator, Sicily, from her
geographical position, offered the required basis of power.
The three great Hohenstaufen Emperors all turned persistently
to Sicily precisely because they knew exactly what Sicily had
to offer that Germany denied. In the time of the Crusaders
Sicily was in fact the " port and navel of all the kingdoms of
the world," just as Spain was to be in the age of discovery.
As Charles V was one day to take Holland for his northern base
and make Germany an Atlantic state, the Hohenstaufen was
now to create a Mediterranean state including Swabia and
south Germany.
Frederick's personal affection for Sicily is undeniable and in
the given conditions was pure advantage. But he loved it. also
because he needed it. It is characteristic that this affection was
not chiefly directed to the luxuriant half-tropical Palermo,
which he never visited in the latest years at all, but Apulia,
STIMULUS TO CREATIVE ART in
Campania and the Capitanata, the provinces marching with the
States of the Church, and the territories nearest to Roma caput
mundi.
The data in North and South were radically different ; so
was Frederick's method of approach. In Germany Frederick
had set free all the cosmopolitan forces he could, to fuse Ger
many into the Roman Empire. In Sicily, on the other hand,
there was cosmopolitanism enough and to spare, and no fear of
stagnation. Sicily was more likely to tear herself to pieces from
over-vitality, and Frederick had to tame and bind those very
forces which he had sought to loose in Germany. Thus ulti
mately the two kingdoms would be drawn together and each
would in its own way be " romanised." The sensitive and
educative statesmanship of Frederick was so successful that
Germany in his day gave birth to a plastic art and — for the first
time since the days of her tyrants — song was heard again in
Sicily. In both cases these periods of artistic creation were
the product of incomparably daring, almost foolhardy, experi
ments which none but a master, and he for a limited period,
could have dared to try.
The Sicilians had been anticipating the Emperor's arrival with
justifiable anxiety ; for almost all had at one time or another
betrayed the boy king. A number of the Sicilian barons
appeared already at the coronation in Rome to do homage to
Frederick and draw, as far as possible, a veil over the past.
Frederick had carefully and thoughtfully planned every step
beforehand, and had even begun his preparations during his
years in Germany. They well might have divined from one
straw or another how the wind was blowing. One of the
usurpers, Count Rainer of Manente, who was reputed to have
on one occasion attempted Frederick's life, had rashly entered
Germany and approached the King without a safe conduct.
Frederick secured his person. It is true that, at the Pope's
request, he ultimately released his prisoner, but the Count was
made disgorge the entire crown property which he had appro
priated and which his relations with the help of bandit allies
sought to retain. The fact also that on his march through
Upper Italy Frederick granted no privileges relating to Sicily,
indicated well-defined plans. His first aim was to bring to-
ii2 THE LAW OF PRIVILEGES m
gether again all the crown property which had been scattered
and squandered by each temporary wielder of power. His
second to eradicate all the little nests of secondary powers
dotted over his kingdom and so to establish a central govern
ment once more. With all his fiery lust for action (which Pope
Honorius mentions, more in blame than praise) Frederick II
set himself to his task.
The Roman Curia had seen Frederick's happy faculty for
solving many difficult issues by one well-judged move. This,
however, was in the diplomatic sphere and might have indicated
merely a skill in casuistry. Frederick was now in the thick of
real life. One single simple law, almost ludicrously simple,
brought in a moment to a standstill all the hurly-burly of strife
and disaffection in Sicily, precisely in the way most useful
to Frederick personally. The last legitimate Norman king,
William II, had died in 1 189, and for the succeeding thirty years
sheer confusion had prevailed. Royal prerogatives and rights,
crown lands and fiefs had been recklessly squandered, aban
doned, given away, some by Henry VI, with the full intention
of ultimately recovering them, some by the many fleeting
regents of Frederick's youth, till the Crown was completely
impoverished and had lost all power. The evil of these thirty
years must be undone. The strong position which the Norman
Kings had upheld was largely grounded on the extensive crown
domains ; the Demanium must be restored to the ruler. By
a law which he had long before excogitated " de resignandis
privileges " Frederick declared to be null and void all grants,
gifts, donations, privileges, confirmation of titles and the like
of the last thirty years. Every man must bring his documents,
except those relating to purely private property, within the
next few months and table them in the imperial chancery.
Here they would be examined and, if it seemed desirable,
renewed.
Every possessor therefore of crown lands, crown fiefs, royal
grants, tolls, privileges and what not, was suddenly reduced to
beggary, and at the Emperor's option would retain or forfeit
his possession. We cannot speak with certainty about the dis
tribution of such property, as the vital Chancery records have
been destroyed ; but we know that nobles and monasteries and
CONCEPTION OF "JUSTICE" 113
towns, and even numerous simple citizens (as farmers of petty
taxes or holders of certain privileges perhaps), were hit by this
enactment. The decisive consideration for the cancellation of
privileges was, broadly, whether the Emperor needed the castle,
the land, the tax or the special prerogative at the moment for
the construction of his state, or whether he did not. If wanted
by the Emperor, the property whose titles had been submitted
to the inquisitorial eyes of the imperial court was simply con
fiscated, otherwise the holder received his diploma back again,
new-issued and with an added formula by which the Emperor
reserved the right to recall the new title at any time.
A further advantage had been secured by the imperial
Chancery — an exact knowledge of all grants of every kind and
their distribution, by which the Crown could at any moment
lay hands on anything it wanted. Further, the Emperor could
at his own good pleasure cancel at least the special separate
privileges of any disaffected persons or powers. Further yet,
the Crown — that is the King and State, for no separation of the
two was dreamt of — regained possession of its extremely ex
tensive property, and, finally, the Emperor was provided with a
legal backing for the measures he directed against the various
petty powers. This was a characteristic device of Frederick's.
He took the stage not as a conqueror, but as a fulfiller of the
law. He was quick to point this out and warn all against
putting their trust in illegal evasions ; these would be valueless,
for he had come to place justice on her throne once more and
let her light shine again under his rule.
" Justice " for Frederick meant no rigid code, but the rights
of a living state determined by the ever-changing necessities of
the hour. In defiance of well-known medieval theories justice
thus became a living thing, moving, progressive, capable of
development and change — as we shall expound more fully
later. From this chameleon justice sprang the Emperor's legal
" Machiavellianism " in the service of the state (not of the
prince) which made its abrupt appearance in the first applica
tion of the Law of Privileges which in the manifold ramifications
of its operations was the basis on which the whole new order
in Sicily was founded.
A considerable number of the Sicilian barons had attended
ii4 BORDER FORTRESS in
the coronation in Rome. The most powerful of them all,
Thomas of Celano, Count of Molise, who alone could put some
1400 knights and esquires in the field, had sent his son to meet
Frederick to do him homage and to enlist his favour. Like
most of the other nobles the Count of Molise had played the
traitor, and his father had been one of the chief supporters of
Kaiser Otto. In spite of the weighty advocacy of the Pope and
of Cardinal Thomas of Capua, Frederick refused to accept the
proffered submission. There is no reason to suppose that
Frederick cherished any special ill-will towards this particular
count. He was determined to subdue the entire body of con
tinental nobles, and he was exactly obeying that first and simplest
mle — which Machiavelli later preached as a doctrine — by boldly
declaring war against the most powerful and playing off the
lesser barons against him. When the big man was disposed of
by their help he would find it an easy matter to rid himself of
the small ones in their turn. Frederick accepted the homage
of the minor nobles in Rome ; at least he immediately found
a means of utilising Counts Roger of Aquila, Jacob of San
Severino, Richard of Ajello, Richard of Celano and many
another. On the ground of the Law of Privileges which he was
just about to promulgate, and other orders which he issued
immediately after the coronation, he commanded them to hand
over certain castles which they possessed. For it was all-
important to be in control of fortified positions in the kingdom.
It was a happy chance that the barons had been witnesses of
the coronation ceremonies and the entente between Emperor
and Pope ; overcome by all they had seen, they obeyed him
without protest. The Emperor cared nothing for individuals,
only for the cause. The Abbot of Monte Cassino, who had also
come to the coronation in Rome, had always been loyal and
submissive ; nevertheless he had to surrender, under the same
law, not only certain revenues, but also, most surely against his
will, two important border fortresses, Rocca d'Evandro and
Atina. These with three more castles, Suessa, Teano and
Mondragone (which Count Roger of Aquila was compelled to
hand over), covered Frederick's entrance into the kingdom and
secured the road to Capua. Frederick crossed the border at
Monte Cassino in December 1220.
DEC. 1220 DIET OF CAPUA 115
These first castles were chosen for confiscation solely on
account of their strategic importance. They were the same
positions which the Romans had fortified of old against the
Samnites. The same considerations applied to Sora and
Cajazzo, which he next seized. These castles would strengthen
his front towards the South-East. His first immediate goal
was Capua.
Thus before he had entered his kingdom he had firm ground
under his feet. There were a few entirely trustworthy families
of the royal nobility on whose strength he could rely : the
Cicali, the Eboli, above all the lords of Aquino. Immediately
on entering Sicily Frederick created Landulf of Aquino Justi-
ciar of the Terra Laboris, roughly the modern Campania ;
while another, the elder Thomas of Aquino, he named Chief
Justice of the same district and of Apulia and created him
Count of Acerra. He had, further, at his disposal the fighting
forces of the erstwhile traitor barons mentioned above, who had
now done homage. Relying solely on the barons, Frederick
set out to fight the barons. He had brought very few troops
with him from Germany to Italy and most of these were cru
saders, so he entered Sicily almost without an army, but, on
the other hand, accompanied by Roffredo of Benevento, some
time professor of law in Bologna. Frederick was anxious to
conquer his country with the forces of the country itself.
In December 1220 he held a great Diet in Capua and promul
gated a number of laws. The most important was the Law of
Privileges ; another, also directed against the barons, was
closely allied : all castles and fortified places erected by vassals
in the course of the last thirty years were to be surrendered to
the crown or, alternatively, razed to the ground. The right of
fortification was a royal prerogative, and from time immemorial
vassals had therefore been forbidden to build castles even on
their own land. So the new law was only the re-assertion of
an ancient royal right. The Diet of Capua created the legal
basis for Frederick's future procedure, for which the struggle
with the barons, the resumption of crown lands and castles,
formed only the lever de rideau. The Emperor did not even
conduct these operations in person. If the surrender was
peaceful the two ad hoc officials were sufficient ; if resistance
n6 THE SICILIAN BARONS in
was offered the submissive barons were delegated to break it.
Thomas of Aquino, for instance, was presently put in command
of the campaign against the Count of Molise. Frederick
thus kept his hands free for other work : for many things were
happening simultaneously.
We must now follow in detail the two years' campaign for
the reduction of the continental barons. Within a few months
the Emperor was in possession of quite a number of fortresses
in the north of the kingdom. The Count of Ajello surrendered
the castle from which he took his name. The Rocca d'Arce, a
border fortress against the States of the Church, was quickly
conquered by Roger of Aquila. Diepold of Schweinspeunt's
brother surrendered the castles of Cajazzo and Allifae, and
Diepold himself, whom Frederick had for years held prisoner
as hostage for these castles, was finally released and ostensibly
received into the Teutonic Order. The county of Sora with
its castle of Sorella was attached ; it had been at one time
pledged to Pope Innocent III and by him handed over to his
brother Richard. During the next few years a whole series of
further fortresses were conquered, destroyed or newly fortified,
amongst them Naples, Gaeta, Aversa, Foggia. The Alsatians
had coined a phrase about the Hohenstaufen, Duke Frederick,
" He always has a castle tied to his horse's tail," and this would
equally be applicable to his later namesake.
The spring of 1221 saw the beginning of the campaign
against the Count of Molise. He had entrenched himself in
two almost impregnable Abruzzi fortresses, Bojano and Rocca-
mandolfi, and was beleaguered by the imperial generals. Bojano
was taken by assault. Roccamandolfi was forced to surrender ;
the count himself escaped to a third stronghold, Ovindoli,
whose resistance was not lightly overcome. After lasting the
better part of two years the campaign was finally ended by a
treaty under which Ovindoli was surrendered. The Count
went into banishment ; his personal possessions in Molise were
for the present secured to him, or rather to his countess.
Before long, however, a pretext was made that he had broken
the treaty ; he failed to obey the summons to appear before
the imperial court, and Frederick confiscated the entire Molise
property, as he had doubtless all along intended to do. Celano
THE MOLISE CAMPAIGN 117
was the most important town in the Count's domains ; on
account of a treacherous attack on a detachment of imperial
troops it was razed to the ground and the inhabitants scattered.
Later they were re-assembled and deported to Sicily, where
Frederick had a scheme for utilising them. Years afterwards
they were permitted to return home and rebuild Celano under
the name of Caesarea. Thus the home town of Thomas of
Celano, the Franciscan, suffered in some degree a dies irae in
his lifetime.
That, however, was the end of the Molise campaign, and the
most powerful of the continental barons had now been over
come, but the action against the body of feudal lords as a whole
was not yet completed. Frederick had not the smallest in
tention of remaining so dependent on the smaller barons as he
had been during these years. They also must be crushed.
Frederick seized the first convenient opportunity after the
Molise campaign. The Counts Roger of Aquila, Jacob of San
Severino and some others had been summoned to war against
the Saracens ; some had not appeared at all, some had come
with scanty forces. The Emperor ordered their arrest and the
confiscation of their lands. On the Pope's intervention he
released the prisoners but sent them into exile. They followed
the Count of Molise to Rome.
This blow was the last. The resistance of the feudal nobility
was at an end, except for a few trifling episodes, for the duration
of Frederick's rule — the moral of which is that stern and ruth
less measures are also the most humane if the person who
employs them is sure of his aim. Plato saw no alternative line
of conduct for a " Tyrant " who is of necessity compelled to
" purge the State " by slaying and exiling. It is disconcerting
to see with what prophetic insight Emperor Frederick obeyed
the rules of Machiavelli, who demands under all circumstances
that the earliest allies must be got rid of, otherwise they will
later prove the most dangerous opponents, for they will allow
themselves liberties towards their master and their demands on
his gratitude will be insatiable. Machiaveili's counsels would
have struck a more sympathetic chord in Frederick than the
actual advice of his contemporary, Thomas of Gaeta. This
old Sicilian official, who had been entrusted with numerous
ii8 FREDERICK AND THE FEUDAL SYSTEM in
missions to the papal court, shared in many things the point of
view of Rome. He was horrified at the new state of affairs and
advised the Emperor " rather to build churches and cloisters "
—an occupation which offered Frederick no attractions— " than
to fortify hills and crown the mountain heights with castles.
Better to win men's hearts than their bodies, for the love of his
subject is the only impregnable bulwark of a king." Frederick
did not take this greatly to heart. He displayed a wonderful
lust for building, but during his whole life built only one single
insignificant little church — and that with extreme reluctance.
The power of the great nobles had thus been broken and, like
other statesmen, Frederick found it convenient to enlist in his
service the minor nobility — taking care for the most part not
unduly to enrich them. All his actions in these matters are
part and parcel of his strong dislike of the feudal system on
principle, for it made the direct action of the overlord prac
tically impossible. The most powerful fief-holders had now
been forcibly eliminated, but the legislation of the Diet of
Capua had prepared the way for a complete re-modelling of the
whole feudal fabric. The fighting forces of the nobility were
to be greatly increased and put immediately at the ruler's dis
position. Frederick was not driven to " inventing " new laws.
He called to mind certain ancient Norman laws and gave them
wider application and a definite direction. He first recalled as
many feudal grants as possible and did not again renew them.
All vassals were forbidden to marry without the Emperor's
special permission ; children of a fief-holder could only inherit
their father's fief with the Emperor's consent. These two
laws of marriage and inheritance were rigidly enforced. This
hastened the reversion of fiefs to the Crown. All vassals were
to re-assert any rights that had been filched from them during
the years of chaos, just as the Emperor himself was doing, to
avoid the sub-division of the fief. This measure was not con
ceived in the interests of the fief-holder himself, but in the
interest of the Crown, in case of reversion. For the same reason
all arbitrary creation of under-fiefs on tenure without express
permission was most sternly forbidden, because a fief was
greatly weakened by a train of under-vassals, and if the main
fief fell again to the Crown a host of duties towards the under-
CREATION OF A STATE 119
vassals arose. Moreover, any independence of the subject, such
as was implied by the sub-division of fiefs, was contrary to
Kaiser Frederick's principles of government.
The new feudal order in short laid down : that with reference
to fiefs and their distribution no alteration was to be made in
the status quo as existing at the death of the last Norman king
— no marriage, no inheritance, no sub-letting without ex
press permission from the Emperor. What had been an inde
pendent, living, moving, fluid form of life became in a moment
petrified by one single edict into rigid permanence. Hence
forth modifications could emanate from the Emperor alone, and
he was put in a position from which he could review the whole
detailed situation and exert his direct influence through the
most distant ramifications of the system. Every independent,
natural development was checked and — what entirely suited
Frederick's whole conception — every impulse, every activity
must derive from him personally and have its source in his
imperial will.
The loosely-knit framework of a feudal kingdom, held to
gether by land-tenure alone, was to be succeeded by the firm
architecture of a state : neither land nor fief would in future
bind the noble to his lord — these now imposed duties on him,
without entailing corresponding rights, nothing but personal
service. Thus matters henceforth remained. The possession
of a fief gave the nobleman no weight, only his personal service
rendered directly to the King, either as warrior or, what Frede
rick valued more, as official. This paved the way to the
foundation of a " Court Nobility," such as developed later
under absolutism.
Another measure ran parallel with this state-organisation of
the nobles and the knights. Frederick II was the first to place
castles and fortresses under the immediate administration of the
Crown and State, which was in effect to transform knightly
castles into national strongholds. Over two hundred of these
national towers, castles and fortresses date back to Frederick's
time. This entailed the creation of a new government depart
ment of " national defence," which was made responsible for
the administration, construction and upkeep of the fortresses,
for the supervision of the necessary staff", the payment of the
120 NATIONAL STRONGHOLDS m
garrison and the like. The castles carried naturally no garrison
in times of peace — a custom never known elsewhere — or at most
a chltelain and a couple of men-at-arms. In time of war it was
the duty of the neighbouring fief-holders and districts, who
were also normally drawn on for construction and repair, to
man the forts at command and to bear the costs of so doing.
A type of national defence was thus organised, based on the old
but considerably simplified feudal substructure. This was a
unique creation for the period, especially because it was the
unified product of systematic thought.
Attention should here be drawn to a very important impli
cation of this transformation of knightly castles into state
fortresses : an entirely new style of architecture was evolved
for the new imperial castles that soon began to spring up.
These were no residential castles, as were otherwise the norm,
in which the knight lived with his wife and family ; these were
state strongholds which served as men's quarters only. They
could therefore be built, as were the Roman castra, according
to one single uniform ground plan with slight variations —
representing the last word in simplicity, economy and rectangu-
larity : a stone square or rectangle with a tower at each of its
four corners similar to the well-known specimen in Naples,
Certain sportive variations, especially in the interior and in the
ornamentation and artistic accessories, are of course distinguish
able ; many modifications also due to the site ; but the same
principle underlay them all and the pure form may be seen in
plains and on the coast. People have justifiably seen in these
Sicilian castles of Frederick II the prototype of the Prussian
strongholds of the Teutonic Knights which show the same stark
simplicity of plan. The conditions of the early Prussian state
under the Order corresponded in many particulars to the
Hohenstaufen state in Sicily. The Prussian castles housed no
family life but served only as soldiers' barracks and arsenals.
Both entirely lacked any element of the " picturesque " ; they
are characterised by massiveness and stern straight lines, by
their utilitarian plan and the mathematically simple form. In
the interior there might be groined vaults or cloisters with
pointed arches : Gothic windows and Gothic portals would also
not be lacking ; but the outside, with flat roofs and squat towers,
1221 DIET OF MESSINA 121
showed nothing but right angles — gigantic stone blocks and
cubes.
The arrival of the Emperor had been anticipated with some
anxiety ; after a few months Frederick II was feared. " In the
kingdom all bowed the neck before the Emperor," announces
the chronicler. After the Diet of Capua, followed by a short
stay in Apulia and Calabria, Frederick crossed in May 1221 to
the island of Sicily, leaving his generals and the loyal barons to
prosecute the Molise campaign. He held a new Diet in Messina
and issued new laws, not in brief judicial form but in a style
which later he made his own. The law was accompanied by a
statement of the causes that led up to it and the needs it was
designed to meet. The Assizes of Capua had sketched out the
ground plan and the primary organisation of the Sicilian state,
the edicts of Messina regulated the affairs of subjects who were
outside the feudal framework. Frederick sharply divided them
off from his own citizens . There were laws dealing with players
and blasphemers, with Jews and whores and wandering min
strels. These constituted a potential danger, and Frederick II
set limits to their activities. Players were wont to curse and
blaspheme. It was most unsuitable for them to keep company
with clerics, since it was the churchman's duty to " uphold the
standard of right living in conduct and in speech/' The Jews
were to stitch the yellow patch on their clothing and to let their
beards grow ... in imitation of the Lateran edict of 1215
against Muslims. Without such distinctive marks " the duties
and the practices of the Christian faith will be confused."
Whores might not live in the town or frequent the bath with
respectable women, "for one sick sheep infects the herd."
Players and wandering minstrels should be outlaws " if they
dare to disturb the Emperor's peace with ribald songs." So
the Emperor strove to separate out his own, according to the
precept of the Church.
The necessity to cleanse his land of foreign powers decided
the next blow that Frederick struck on the island. On the
ground of the Law of Privileges he withdrew their prerogatives
from foreign sea-powers and hunted them from the ports of
122 FREDERICK AND THE SEA TOWNS m
Sicily. Amalfi and Pisa, Genoa and Venice had formerly acquired
numerous trading rights in the fertile island. Sicily was not
only as of old one of the great "granaries" from which the
merchant could fetch his corn and perhaps sugar too, and dates,
hemp and flax, silk and wool. The harbours of Sicily were also
important as dockyards and ports of call for sailors of the
Levant, who on their outward or homeward voyage could sell
their Eastern wares or exchange them for Sicilian corn. Since
being sacked by the Normans in 1135 Amalfi had lost her share
of world trade. Venice made use of the harbour of Brindisi —
the island of Sicily lay off her direct route to the East — so it
was Genoa and Pisa who were chiefly interested in Sicilian
commerce. The geographical contiguity of the two mighty
north Italian republics destined them to be rivals, and rivals
they were in every sphere ; at home, in the Ligurian Sea, in
Sardinia and Corsica, in Provence, in the Holy Land, and also
in Sicily. In Sicily they enjoyed almost identical privileges ;
each had a special quarter in all important harbours, a consulate,
a warehouse — the " fondaco " taken over from the Arabs — and
the enjoyment of free trade, which exonerated their merchants
from the payment of taxes, duties, dues, levies, etc.
In political matters the rivalry of the two towns had resulted
in the Genoese allying themselves with their neighbours the
Lombards as anti-Emperor, while the Pisans were correspond
ingly pro-Emperor. Pisa had always placed her fleet at the
Emperor's disposal. In Frederick's youth, therefore, Pisa had
supported Kaiser Otto, while Genoa had had leanings towards
the young King of Sicily. By this connection with the Sicilian
king the Genoese had gained ascendancy in the island, and in
those early years had helped the young king against Pisa.
When Otto IV came to grief, and Pisan politics with him, the
predominance of Genoa in Sicily seemed assured.
An episode that took place during the fighting in Frederick's
youth will illustrate the conduct of the sea-towns. Warlike
Pisan merchants or seamen — corsairs at any rate — had taken
advantage of the confusion prevailing in the kingdom to
make themselves masters of Syracuse and had driven out bishop
and people. Syracuse became a pirate fortress under the pro
tection of Pisa, who used it as a base, at the same time that she
SYRACUSE 123
officially disclaimed all responsibility for what happened there.
In the summer of 1204 a body of homeward-bound Genoese
chanced to meet in Crete others returning from Alexandria, so
that a very considerable Genoese merchant fleet was accidentally
assembled there. They took counsel together and decided to
take Syracuse from the Pisans. The far-famed Genoese cor
sair, Alaman da Costa, who had just captured a Pisan ship laden
with arms, was the originator of this scheme. He put himself
at the head of the Genoese fleet. They sailed for Syracuse, via
Malta, which was then a Genoese dependency, received the
reinforcement of several war-galleys, attacked Syracuse, and in
eight days were masters of the town. Alaman da Costa was
their lord and signed all documents as " by the grace of God,
of the king, and of the town of Genoa, Count of Syracuse and
Officer of the King." He proceeded to enlarge his Syracuse
domain and to assert his influence in Sicilian politics. This
Sicilian Corsair-Tyrant was subject to the mother-city of Genoa,
who could raise certain other claims to Syracuse, based on a
grant of Barbarossa's. So Genoa held Malta, Syracuse and
Crete, the most important bases on the route to the East.
Genoa had thus built her nest in Sicily. Frederick had
the kindliest feelings towards the Genoese, and was not un
mindful that they had stood by him on his march to Germany.
But there was no place in his new state either for a Genoese
dukedom of Syracuse, or for preferential treatment of foreign
commerce, be it Genoese or Pisan. Pisa was now in many
respects better off, for Frederick treated the two rival sea-towns
exactly alike. Pisans and Genoese had done him homage on
the death of Kaiser Otto, and he had confirmed both parties in
their imperial, while cancelling their Sicilian, rights and privi
leges. The Pisans, having a much smaller stake in Sicily, were
well content, and preserved their traditionally loyal attitude,
remaining faithful to Frederick throughout his whole reign, as
they had once been faithful to the Welf. The Genoese, how
ever, once the most highly-favoured sea-power in Sicily, were
extraordinarily hard hit.
Frederick II set at once to work. Count Alaman da Costa
and his Genoese were driven out of Syracuse, a palace in
Palermo which Genoa had used as a warehouse was confiscated
124 CREATION OF A FLEET m
under the Law of Privileges, and similar events took place
in Messina, Trapani and elsewhere. The Sicilian admiral,
William Porcus, was by birth a Genoese ; he prudently saved
himself by flight. The Law of Privileges, which cancelled all
advantages, bore heavily enough on the Genoese, but they were
still more severely hit by a law of the Capua Assizes which
forbade all favours to foreigners at the expense of the native
population, such as freedom from taxes and dues. All this was
most painful to Genoa, who naturally accused Frederick of crass
ingratitude. Frederick, however, could not imperil the struc
ture of his state at the dictates of private gratitude, and he had
to resign himself to the ever-growing ill-humour of the Genoese,
which ultimately, in spite of his repeated efforts to placate them,
developed into open hostility. The needs of Sicily came first :
the state revenues from duties and harbour dues necessarily
sank to a minimum when the most important commercial towns
were untaxed. How considerable these losses to the state had
been in the past is best proved by a Genoese writer, who com
plains in his chronicle that the Sicilian taxes on goods amount
now to 10 per cent, and over.
Frederick had broken the power of the feudal barons on
the Italian continent, and set up a definite counter-force in his
national defence ; he now took corresponding measures in
maritime affairs. The banishment of the foreign sea-powers
made some new creation absolutely imperative : he must him
self create a Sicilian fleet. Here again he utilised his Law of
Privileges : previous exemptions were cancelled and an old
Norman ordinance again enforced, which laid on certain dis
tricts the obligation to furnish seamen, and on the barons the
duty of supplying wood for shipbuilding. The Emperor erected
state wharves and shipyards without delay ; but in any circum
stances the building of ships takes time, so he created his first
fleet chiefly by hire and by purchase. His methods were not
a little inconsiderate : ship masters from the Italian coast-towns
or other merchant seamen who happened to call at Sicilian ports
were invited to hire or sell their vessels voluntarily ; failing this
the ships were taken by force. The Venetians warned their
captains who were touching in Apulia against such sales, and
prosecuted those who sold. War galleys as well as merchant
FREDERICK AND FOREIGNERS 125
ships were thus commandeered — since merchantmen need war
ships for their protection — and the Emperor also set about
building galleys for himself.
Frederick must have strained every nerve over his shipbuild
ing, for by izzi two considerable squadrons sailed to Egypt to
help the crusading army, and his intention was to have fifty
transports and one hundred galleys ready for sea by 1225.
Gradually he created a strong merchant fleet and a powerful
fleet of war, which did him valiant service in his Italian cam
paigns and brought him many a welcome victory.
It was of course at first a purely Sicilian fleet and was not to
become an imperial fleet for some time to come. From the
beginning it flew the banner of the Hohenstaufens — the imperial
Roman eagle on a golden field. In Frederick's day, for the
first time in history, a German- Roman imperial fleet sailed the
Tyrrhenian, Aegean and Ionian Seas, and for the first time mer
chants traded to Syria, Egypt and Tunis under imperial eagles.
One of these ships was styled Aquila, another went by the name
of " the half world," Nisfu'd Dunya. The like was not seen
again for three hundred years, till the time of Charles V.
Frederick gave his new fleet a new admiral, Count Henry of
Malta, like his runaway predecessor a Genoese by birth. He
had been a daring pirate and was likely to prove dangerous ; the
Emperor forestalled his possible hostility by this appointment.
Simultaneously with all this Frederick began to take over the
island castles and put them under the Crown, and to establish
a coastguard service both as a protection against hostile ships
and in preparation for the future war against the Saracens,
which he was not yet ready to attempt. The purging of Sicily
from the foreigner had increased the unity of that country ; the
re-creation of the fleet had extended its authority. The new
independence from foreign commerce and foreign shipping
secured through the fleet made possible a new economic policy.
With great versatility and clearsightedness Frederick immediately
began to foster an active Sicilian trade which had no longer to
compete against the crushing privileges of foreign powers. The
full development of Kaiser Frederick's much admired and
wonderfully organised policy is not attained till later, but
even in these early days it is possible to recognise in various
126 TRADE in
occurrences Frederick's passionate and indefatigable pursuit of
unity and the uncompromising forcefulness and directness of
his methods.
In spite of the rigid enforcement of the Law of Privileges,
which took cognisance of the last thirty years, the Pisans and
Genoese still enjoyed many privileges and prerogatives dating
from earlier times, so that the Sicilians were still handicapped
in trade competition with them. Frederick might have rectified
this by conferring on his own subjects corresponding rights and
favours, and thus putting them on an equal footing with the
foreigner. This expedient, however, would have stultified his
entire policy, which had suppressed most of the privileges of
the harbour towns. Foreign commerce had suffered somewhat
by Frederick's forcible purchase of ships belonging to the sea-
powers — particularly because he thus withdrew for his own use
tonnage from the foreign corn trade. He now drove them
from the field without infringing their ancient Norman charters.
The Emperor, at a later date, contrived to divert to his own
coffers the enormous profits which accrued to the foreign sea-
states from the purchase of relatively cheap Sicilian corn, by
conveying the corn himself to the foreign markets in his state
ships and selling it there himself at the high local prices. In
these early years, however, while the imperial fleet was still in
the making, and, moreover, subject to heavy claims on it in
connection with the Crusade, the Emperor devised another
scheme for preventing excessive gains by foreign profiteers.
In 1224 he for a time forbade all export of corn, foodstuffs
and cattle. The commercial powers might only purchase their
corn direct from the Crown, and Frederick took care to fix the
price so high that the old privileges were of no avail, while the
Crown benefited most handsomely. The immediate result in
Sicily itself was such a fall in food prices that the producers
scarcely recovered their costs . The Emperor immediately seized
this opportunity of making large purchases for the Crown. This
had been a bye-product — pleasant or unpleasant — of the em
bargo ; it had not been the motive of the imperial measure,
which was directed in the first place against the ancient privi
leges. Private trade (which, however, recorded the very next
year considerable shipments to Venice) was inevitably injured
TAXATION 127
by this arbitrary interference, a fact which will not greatly have
disturbed the Emperor. For his emergency measure was neces
sary at the time unless the greatest gains were to be lost to the
country, and the individual was not, in any case, in a position
to reap them.
The sea-powers were driven out, their warehouses abolished,
and the supervision of the Sicilian harbours became possible.
The Emperor did not fail to avail himself of the fact. In order
to attract as large a supply of food into the island as possible
during the Saracen war Frederick granted in 1222 complete
freedom from import duties in Palermo. By the opening of
this one port (together with the closing of the others, which we
may assume) Frederick once more attracted trade and directed
it to the very point which was most advantageous for his mili
tary operations. This proved most successful ; the feeding of
the army was assured.
Similar autocratic measures are observable in other depart
ments, though we have not always the clue to their interpre
tation. The export of the precious metals was sternly for
bidden, and all payments to foreigners had to be made in the
coarse newly-coined silver " imperials/' which became legal
tender. Frederick guaranteed that this currency would be
maintained and he watched carefully over it. Numerous fairs
were abolished, which indicates an attempt to centralise trade,
for the local fair frittered it away and brought advantage only
to a few great folk. For the first time in 1223 Frederick began
to impose a direct tax which was repeated every three, two or
one years according to need, but in his later days became a
regular annual tax. These " collections," which were originally
an extra-ordinary source of revenue, were thus conducted : the
Emperor named the total sum required, and probably also dic
tated how it was to be distributed over the separate provinces ;
the further sub-division was then left to the provincial governors,
the justiciarSy who with the tax-collectors were responsible for
actually getting the money in. Only when taken in conjunction
with the Emperor's later measures do these scattered individual
ordinances give a complete picture of his economic policy.
Even by themselves, however, they show a definite tendency : to
seek a state unity even in commercial affairs, and to institute
Ill
128 SARACEN CAMPAIGNS
as far as possible a state trading-monopoly with the outside
world.
The Saracen war has several times been mentioned. Frede
rick began it in 1222, his second Sicilian year. It was not
his task to combat an independent Muslim amirate dating from
the days of the Aghlabites, who had from Tunis conquered
Sicily in the ninth century as heirs, in the second degree, of the
Phoenicians. That had already been done by the Normans.
He had to fight the scattered remnants of originally independent
Saracens who still maintained themselves in the inaccessible
highlands of the interior. They were strengthened by
numerous fugitives from Palermo, who with a few of their big
men had escaped a bloody massacre which the Christians of the
capital had indulged in in 1 190. Runaway Saracen serfs joined
them, perhaps some clansmen also from Africa ; be that as it
may, they constituted a very considerable power, which for
decades had owned allegiance to none, and had gradually got
the whole centre of the island into their power.
In the days of Pope Innocent's guardianship these Saracens,
like the continental knights and the corsairs of the coasts, had
been redoubtable foes and much-coveted allies. They had
been uniformly hostile to Frederick, the Pope's ward, and in
various ways had more than once sought his life. Just as the
Genoese had established themselves in Syracuse, the Saracens
had made themselves a base at Girgenti, probably in order to
maintain their communications with Africa. They had also
taken the bishop prisoner and driven out a portion of the popu
lation, and had finally pursued their robber-raids northwards
almost to the coast as far as Monreale just south of Palermo.
A struggle with them was inevitable, for the Emperor's writ ran
only round a narrow strip of coast.
The campaign developed into a weary and expensive petty
war against these enemies in their mountain fastnesses. The
details are little known. At the very outset, in the first summer,
the chief Saracen fortress Yato had been besieged and even
temporarily occupied. The Amir, Ibn Abbad, had abandoned
all hope of victory and had set out with his sons to go to
SUBJUGATION OF SARACENS 129
Frederick and sue for peace. The Emperor was in the highest
degree incensed against Ibn Abbad — who had maltreated some
imperial messengers. So enraged was he that a scene followed
which recalls the passionate outburst of the seven-year-old
Frederick. Ibn Abbad entered the imperial tent and flung
himself at the Emperor's feet ; on the instant Frederick plunged
his spur into the Amir and tore his side open. Frederick had
him removed from the tent and a week later hanged him and
his sons as rebels. Two merchants from Marseilles who hap
pened to be captured at the same time as the Amir shared his
fate. Ten years before they had hawked boys and girls of the
Children's Crusade in the slave markets of Tunis and Cairo,
and had now been just in the act of betraying Frederick to
the Amir.
After this initial success the Emperor spent the winter in
continental Sicily. But the garrison he had sent to Yato was
betrayed and massacred by the Muslims to the last man, and
the Admiral, Henry of Malta, who had been left in charge of
the island had been powerless to prevent another rally of the
Saracens. The Admiral's excuse that his forces had been too
small to risk an attack was rejected. He fell into disfavour and
forfeited Malta. Later Frederick restored him again to favour
and gave back his possessions — all but the fortress of Malta.
Frederick had to re-open the Saracen war next summer, for its
continuation was imperative. By a raid on the islands of North
Africa, in which the fleet was employed for the first time as a
fighting force, Frederick sought to sever communication with
Africa and establish the imperial authority there. In spite of
this and further successes the Emperor was compelled for many
years to come to keep imperial troops in the island, and the war
flared up again from time to time, but the outbreaks were always
of short duration.
Such is, in brief, the tale of the subjugation of the Saracens
of Sicily, of which all the chroniclers speak with admiration.
The most amazing thing is Frederick's method of dealing with
the situation. After the second campaign the Emperor decided
to remove as many Saracens as possible from the island. They
gave no peace in the mountains of Sicily ; he transplanted
them to the plains of Apulia. Some 16,000 Muslims, in the
130 FOUNDATION OF LUCERA m
beginning mostly agricultural serfs — all Muslims were in any
case slaves of the king, servi, just as were the Jews — were
gradually transferred to Lucera, which was transformed into a
military colony. The town thus resumed its original function :
for in the oldest Roman times Lucera had been a military colony.
It lay in the Capitanata near Monte Gargano and Foggia, the
favourite dwelling-place of Kaiser Frederick in later days.
During Hohenstaufen times it had sunk into a half-depopulated
town of the demanium. Frederick soon strengthened Lucera
with a large imperial fortress, and here the Muslims lived
entirely amongst their own kind. They had their own chief,
the Qa'id, with their own Shaikhs and Faqihs. Thus there grew
up in the heart of the oldest Christian country near the frontier
of the papal patrimonium a genuine Muhammadan town with
all its characteristic mosques and minarets, visible afar across
the levels of Apulia. The duty of the new inhabitants was to
cultivate the neglected land, and they proved remunerative
citizens also through the special taxes imposed on Muslims : a
poll-tax, jizya, for toleration of their faith, and the terragium,
for enjoyment of the soil. Frederick transported to Lucera
all the Saracen serfs on whom he could lay hands, whether they
had fought against him or not, and the landowners of the island
were thus robbed of labour. To replace this the Emperor sent
them the exiled citizens of Celano, and later some people from
Lombardy, but these probably did not suffice to make up
the deficiency. The Emperor, however, needed labour for his
extensive domains more than anyone else could. Moreover, he
had another and far more important use for his Lucera colonists.
These peaceful agriculturists could leap in a moment to their
home-made arms, bows and arrows, and take the field as an
ever-ready military force. They could serve as light infantry
or, with no change of weapons, as light-armed cavalry, drawing
their excellent horses from their own studs. It was an extra
ordinarily dangerous troop, obeying the Emperor alone, un
heeding the Pope or his ban, whom Frederick thus collected
round him. He succeeded in an incredibly short time in
changing the savage hate of the conquered into that fanatical
devotion which the Oriental is ready to bestow on the master
who protects him, the lord of whom he is the slave. In later
TOLERATION OF MUSLIMS 131
years Frederick never felt so safe as among his Saracens, and it
was a Saracen bodyguard who permanently watched over this
German emperor or — as they called him in Lucera — this
11 Sultan." There were always numerous Saracen servants in
Frederick's household, while in the imperial quarters in Lucera,
the notorious " harem/' the industrious Saracen maidens had
to weave and work for their master.
It is impossible to withhold admiration from the wisdom with
which Frederick — still scarcely thirty — knew how to tackle all
the forces of opposition, and liberate their hidden strength for
the benefit of the state. No material came amiss to his hand.
He had in him more than a little of an Eastern despot, hence
this idea of transplanting the Saracens, cutting them adrift from
all connection with their past, demonstrating to them that
they were wholly dependent on their master for weal or woe.
Finally, taking advantage of their resignation, their natural joy
in servitude, he cultivated in them systematically a fanatical
devotion to his person . This is the constantly recurring principle
in the East, which reached its culmination in the Janissaries of
the Osmanli Sultans.
It can easily be surmised that this Muslim colony in the
middle of a Christian country was a rock of offence to the
Church — a matter of complete indifference to Frederick. For
he had in his Saracens what no other western monarch of
the day could boast : a standing army, a body of men ever
ready for action, unreservedly devoted to him as the protector
of their faith. This was the tie which bound the Saracens to
Frederick II. Exiles as they were in a foreign land, they found
protection for their faith in him alone. Frederick was careful
not to loose the bond. The last thing he desired was their
conversion to Christianity. Only for a very short time, at a
moment of acute tension in his relations with the Pope, did
he, most reluctantly, give permission to a few Dominicans to
undertake a mission in Lucera. It was scarcely necessary,
he added, for a few of them were already converts. The con
version of the Muslims had another disadvantage from his
point of view — he lost the poll-tax. Muhammad's own hordes
of Arabs had, for the same good reason, looked on it with no
great enthusiasm when the conquered embraced Islam. The
132 ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE m
whole idea of a poll-tax on unbelievers was an inheritance which
Sicily owed to the Saracens.
The deportation of the Saracens had as a consequence the
purging of Sicily from " heathen and heathen households," as
a chronicler expressly remarks. Frederick was the first who,
by this weeding out of the Muhammadans, made the kingdom
of Sicily almost uniformly Christian — with the exception of a
few Jews. The Greeks counted only as schismatics. This
cleared the way for a new development : the conceptions of
purity of faith and purity of race, topics on which Frederick
later found remarkable things to say. His Saracen war was the
end of the struggle with Islam on Italian soil. The only spot
in Europe in which the faith of Muhammad still flourished was
Spain.
In less than three years Frederick II had thus converted the
Sicilian chaos into some semblance of a state. His methods
and his weapons had varied with the adversary ; more un
scrupulous than the shifty barons, politically more far-sighted
than the coast towns, or at least fully their equal. The goal
was always the same : the abolition of unjust privilege in favour
of national unity. Here for the first time we note the uncom
promising directness of Frederick's action ; he always chose
the shortest road through the jungle ; the immediate practical
need of the state was his guide and over-rode all moral, senti
mental or other considerations whatsoever.
A highly important institution owed its foundations to state
necessity. The rough work was hardly complete when
Frederick issued, in the spring of 1224, the edict that called
the University of Naples into being. At the Diet of Capua the
Emperor had most sternly forbidden lay or clerical nobles to
administer justice themselves or empower others to do so. It
was the Emperor's business, and his alone, to set up justices and
courts of law. The justices' business was to provide them
selves with such legal knowledge as was necessary for the ad
ministration of the law. The University of Naples was now
created to supply them with such knowledge.
The Emperor stated most explicitly in the charter of the
1224 UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES 133
university that its first function was to train shrewd and intelli
gent men for the imperial service ; men to whom the practice
of the law could be entrusted throughout the kingdom. It was
not Frederick's way to do things by halves ; he established not
only a Law School in Naples but a studium generate which
embraced every sort of intellectual training, including medi
cine, on the model of the adjacent Salerno. Naples thus
became the first utilitarian State University, distinguished from
all existing high schools and Church universities by the fact
that teaching was to be carried out not for the sake of know
ledge merely but for the advantage of the state, that it was to
be a nursery for imperial officials and not for priests. There
had hitherto been no demand for such a school : counts and
bishops had sufficed to supervise the country, of whom we
may state Barbarossa's two paladins to be characteristic types :
Otto of Wittelsbach and Archbishop Reginald of DasseL
Frederick IFs state was the first to feel the need of enlisting
intellectual, well-educated laymen, skilled in the law, to under
take the administration. Alongside Church universities and
town universities there now springs up this university whose
teachers are appointed and paid by the state. Clearly the new
university was founded with one fighting front towards the
Church and one towards Bologna. Frederick had from of old
great respect and affection for Bologna and had no wish to
injure it by competition, but he was anxious to protect his
budding officials from the rebellious, free-thinking atmosphere
of the north Italian communes, for which he had less than no
sympathy. So Naples was to educate and train men who
would be not only intellectually equal to Church and commune,
but who should embody the exactly opposite spirit to that
animating the two powers who were ultimately to prove
Frederick's deadly enemies, and who even thus early were
causing him uneasiness.
Apart from these larger issues the foundation of this univer
sity was justified by domestic considerations. Frederick was
determined forcibly to win control over men's minds and bring
them within the unity of the state. The charter states that the
courses of general study shall be so organised that those
who hunger and thirst after wisdom may find what they
134 AMENITIES OF NAPLES in
seek within the kingdom itself, and need not be forced to leave
the country to pursue their studies abroad. The scholars will
be released from long journeyings and free to study under their
parents' eyes. Frederick forthwith ordained — to make it clear
to students that they had in no wise the option of accepting or
rejecting the Emperor's benevolence — that in future no Sicilian
subject might attend any university other than that of Naples,
and those Sicilians at present studying elsewhere must transfer
their work to Naples before a certain date. The first object
of this ordinance was to ensure for the newly-founded univer
sity, which had behind it no long and gradual development,
the greatest possible number of students. To the same end
Frederick sought to entice foreigners to Naples by every means
in his power. All inhabitants of the Roman Empire were
permitted to study at the Emperor's university which he had
founded in "pleasant Naples"; lodgings, security, money
advances, cheap living conditions, everything had been pro
vided for ; the country had abundant supplies of corn and wine,
meat and fish. A highly-qualified teaching staff was assembled
in Naples, for the Emperor had appointed his judge, Roifredo
of Benevento, and several other eminent men, professors at the
new university. All other universities being out of bounds for
his subjects, Frederick's new creation at once enjoyed a mono
poly; no one in the kingdom might undertake to teach any
subject taught at the university. Any existing schools of this
sort were closed.
A further consideration underlies all these arrangements.
However much the Emperor rejoiced in the "joy of the road "
that possessed the wandering scholars in the Empire, he had
no sympathy or patience with it in his kingdom. Wandering
knights, wandering scholars, and even wandering singers " who
with ribald songs disturb the Emperor's peace " had no legiti
mate place in his concentrated, severely-organised society. As
far therefore as lay in his power he cut their wanderings
short, unless they were directly employed in his own service.
Frederick's intention was, by his university, to retain in the
country the best brains it possessed, to educate them in his own
spirit, free from outside distractions, and to enlist their un
limited and undivided devotion in his service and the state's.
TRANSFORMATION OF SICILY 135
It was his task to see that Sicily herself offered to his subjects
all that they had hitherto gone abroad to seek. Frederick
was as thorough in this as in his other enterprises ; he is the
first Emperor who consciously and deliberately set himself to
establish an empire over the minds of men.
Frederick II had thus rapidly tackled every department of
life in his state and had left his mark upon them all. There
was to be practically no activity which did not emanate from
him, and none which did not in its turn advantageously react
upon the state. The feudal system had become static : the
more important nobility were in the direct service of the Em
peror ; the castles had become national fortresses ; trade had
been to a large extent nationalised ; markets and fairs reduced
in number and concentrated ; a stately fleet created, in com
parison with which private merchant ships were almost negli
gible ; unity of faith had been approximately achieved ; the
Saracens herded into one single colony ; a standing army
established ; independent justice assured ; and now, finally,
those halls of learning opened which would spread the imperial
spirit and attract collaborators. It was no small achievement
for a man of thirty, and all had been accomplished with joy and
zest, almost in play, on the basis of one single law. All had
been set in motion almost simultaneously ; indeed only the
immediate successful interlocking of the various cogs made the
wheels turn. Only one power, not a Sicilian but a world
power, the Church, still resisted every onslaught of Frederick's.
For some years Frederick had worn the imperial crown, but
his achievements had been confined to one relatively restricted
sphere : he had been playing the king only, and though these
kingly deeds would presently serve the Emperor they had
not yet assumed any importance for Christendom at large.
Frederick could already, as Roman emperor, hold the balance
even against a world power like Church and Pope, but before
he could seriously challenge it he must himself become a
" world power " too. This position could not be achieved all
in a moment, nor could Frederick in his progress have over
leaped the king stage. Pope Honorius still wrote to him during
136 DISASTER OF DAMIETTA ni
these years that he was overlooking occasional trespasses as
natural to " the fiery spirit of your youth," by which phrase he
drew the sting from Frederick's attacks. The political relation
was parallel to the human. Frederick had not yet got a unified,
consolidated World Empire to oppose to the World Church.
The Empire was still in the making. Frederick had only
mediate authority in Germany, and had not even shown himself
there since his formal coronation in Rome. He had indeed
conquered Sicily, but the fruits of his new constitution had
naturally not yet been harvested. He had not even tackled
imperial Italy. So every attempt he made to exercise definite
pressure on the Church was doomed as yet to failure, though
he was able successfully to best her in diplomacy — no con
temptible achievement. He had not yet redeemed his cru
sader's vow and had been able, again and yet again, to postpone
the date of his departure and gain time for his Sicilian reforms.
Many circumstances had favoured him.
On the occasion of his coronation Frederick had promised
to start on the Crusade in the late summer of 1221. He had
only sent two imperial squadrons to Damietta under Admiral
Henry of Malta and the ex-Chancellor Walter of Palear, now
Bishop of Catania ; he himself remained at home. The im
perial reinforcements arrived in Egypt too late, mistakes were
made, the catastrophe of the Nile delta was not to be averted.
Without waiting for the reinforcements, and with wholly in
adequate means, the crusaders had advanced up the Nile from
Damietta to conquer Cairo. The Nile was just beginning
to rise. The Egyptians breached the dams, and finally the
Christian army had to capitulate and surrender Damietta.
The Emperor's presence would have been of no avail.
All Christendom was affected by the defeat of the crusading
army ; most heavily of all Pope Honorius, who had himself
initiated the Crusade. Frederick II was not unaffected by the
failure either. His correspondence and some meetings with
Pope Honorius had reference to the events in the East.
New extensive preparations were agreed upon, arrangements
for which made further postponement inevitable, and this
in turn secured further respite for Frederick IFs work in
Sicily.
1225 SAN GERMANO 137
He pleaded, not without justification, that he was waging
war against the infidel Saracen just as much in Sicily as in the
Holy Land. Fresh recruiting for the Crusade must be begun
(Hermann of Salza undertook it for Germany) and for three
successive years laymen and clerics had to submit to extra
ordinary taxes for the new enterprise. Success was every
where slight, Crusade-enthusiasm seemed to have evaporated
for ever, protracted preparations were needed. The reports
sent by the German Grand Master, and corroborated by
others, at last convinced Honorius of the general apathy
and discontent, and he decided to grant Frederick a further
respite till 1227. This was agreed on at San Germano in
1225 and laid down in a treaty after earlier conferences on
Eastern affairs between Pope and Emperor (in 1222 at Veroli,
in 1223 at Ferentino). At each of these meetings Frederick
had succeeded in winning a further delay, which, in the cir
cumstances, the Pope was unable to refuse. Pope Honorius
showed considerable annoyance, which was not to be wondered
at, for the Crusade was the very breath of his nostrils to this
ailing, aged man.
The San Germano agreement gave Honorius the necessary
securities for the ultimate undertaking of the Crusade, but he
had the vexation of seeing the whole organisation of it slip from
the fingers of the papal Curia and pass into the Emperor's hands
— where many people thought it should have rested all along.
The conditions of the agreement were certainly not light, for
Frederick shouldered sole and only responsibility. It is a testi
mony to the capacity of his kingdom that he swore on his soul
to set out for the Holy Land in August 1227 with 1000 knights ;
to maintain this force there for two years ; to hold ships in
readiness for the transport of a further 2000, each knight with
his following and three horses. He promised finally before
crossing over to deposit in five instalments 100,000 ounces of
gold (about quarter of a million sterling) to be forfeited for the
cause of the Holy Land if for any reason the Emperor failed to
go on the Crusade. Hermann of Salza was to be the trustee
for this immense sum. Apart from the money penalty the
Emperor declared himself ready to incur the papal ban as a
dilatory crusader if he failed to start on the appointed date or
138 "THE SWORD OF THE CHURCH" in
in any other way played false, and he allowed the ban to be
provisionally suspended over him.
In spite of these heavy commitments the Emperor was the
gainer. He had again secured two years5 respite for Sicily and
could turn the Crusade to imperial advantage. Frederick's
present complaisance obliterated for the moment the annoy
ances of the last five years. In his first meeting with the Pope
in 1222 the Emperor seems to have sought to get back into his
power by some means or other the old imperial territories of
central Italy, the " Recuperations " which he had been com
pelled to renounce in favour of the Church. He coveted in
particular Spoleto and the Ancona March. Pope and Cardinals
incontinently refused what the Pope termed " these unseemly
requests." This central Italian complex of territory cut Frede
rick's empire in half, and drove a wedge between Sicily and
imperial Italy. It was an unendurable thorn in Frederick's
side, and sooner or later the question would have to be thrashed
out. Frederick absolutely needed at least the Adriatic coast
districts, the March and Spoleto, as a corridor between Sicily
and Lombardy. The time for forcible annexation had, how
ever, not yet come and Frederick had prematurely disclosed
his plans. The Roman Curia was on the gui vive. Not long
after this the imperial governor, Gunzelin of Wolfenbuttel,
committed certain encroachments, drove out papal officials and
demanded that people should take the oath of allegiance to the
Emperor. In vain the Emperor protested his innocence and
declared that the Governor had exceeded his instructions ; his
assurances fell on deaf ears. Nothing short of the disgrace of
Gunzelin and the intercession of Hermann of Salza sufficed.
With that the storm blew over.
The heavy obligations which Frederick had assumed at San
Germane were in the spirit of his original vow : the Emperor
was the Sword of the Church and the Leader of Christendom,
and on him fell by right the conduct of the Crusade. Other
reasons were operative as well. The Empress Constance had
died in 1222 in Catania. Frederick acceded to a wish of the
Pope and of the German Grand Master, and in order " the better
to conduct the affairs of the Holy Land " declared himself ready
to contract a fresh marriage with the daughter of King John of
NOV. 1225 ISABELLA OF JERUSALEM 139
Jerusalem. The intention of the Curia was to strengthen the
Emperor's connection with Jerusalem, and the plan was suc
cessful. Isabella of Jerusalem was penniless, but she brought
as her dowry the sceptre of the Holy Land, and the lustre this
would lend the Empire was unique.
The hereditary succession of the Syrian kingdom was such
that on the death of her mother Isabella became the heir ;
while her father, Count John of Brienne, merely bore the
honorary title of king. The marriage was celebrated in
Brindisi in the beginning of November 1225, and the barest
recitation of the events flashes a momentary light on the
glamour and the glory of crusading times. The Emperor sent
a squadron of ships with his notables to Acre, and there in the
Church of the Holy Cross the princess was solemnly betrothed,
to the wonderment of all, to the absent Emperor, whose ring
was placed on her finger by a Sicilian bishop. In Tyre the
bride received from the hands of the Patriarch the crown of the
Holy Land, and the Knights of Jerusalem did homage to their
Queen. The Franco-Syrian child of fourteen, escorted by a
knight of the Teutonic Order, embarked on the imperial galley
and sailed across the sea to wed the Emperor of the West. The
poets of the day could not resist a theme so ready to their hand ;
the German epic Ortnit makes this Syrian bridal — adorned with
many a fable, worked up almost into a fairy tale — the centre of
the plot, while other touches hint at Frederick's story. The
hero after many adventures wins his Syrian bride — a worshipper
of Apollo and Muhammad — but not without the help of
Zacharias the King of the Sicilian Saracens, the " wise heathen
of Apulia." A thread of chivalrous romance — hard to reconcile
in appearance with the sober, statesmanlike sense of the Sicilian
autocrat — runs through the whole life of this last Hohenstaufen,
who must in person have lived through all the saga episodes
of the medieval world of knights. If one sought out and wove
together the marvellous adventures of the imperial story, as
reported in history and in legend, the tale would be the typical
biography of a crusading knight as recounted by current
romances.
This magic spell for a moment hid political realities ; their
recrudescence marred the marriage feast. On the wedding day
140 JOHN OF JERUSALEM in
Frederick, as was his right, adopted the title, King of Jerusalem,
which appears henceforth in all his documents after the title of
Roman Emperor, and before that of Sicilian King. Imme
diately he demanded that John of Brienne, titular King of
Jerusalem, should formally renounce his royal rights. King
John was a personal friend of Frederick's, like him one of the
earliest poets to write in the Italian tongue. He had been for
months the Emperor's guest. He had reckoned on being at
least the Viceroy of Jerusalem. He was deeply hurt, and after
a wordy quarrel with the Emperor he fled to Rome. The
Emperor received without delay the homage of the Syrian
grandees. Little is known of Isabella's fate. The Emperor's
quarrel with King John gave rise to many a tale. A French
man relates that Frederick spent his wedding night with a
Syrian niece of King John's, beat Isabella, threw her into prison
and never went near her. But facts give this tale the lie.
Frederick assigned the castle of Terracina near Salerno to his
consort, and took her with him to Sicily. The young girl
certainly exercised no influence on Frederick, and she died in
1228 at the birth of her son Conrad. The crown of Jerusalem
had suddenly lent a tangible political value to the Crusade in
Frederick's eyes. He must win a new kingdom in the East.
State and personal factors were thus combined ; when World
Church, World Empire and World Politics were intermingled
the Crusade gained in importance. Nothing further was needed
but the opportune moment to achieve success.
Pope and Emperor, being in the matter interdependent, were
in the main at one about the Crusade, though it was inevitable
that misunderstandings and differences should arise from time
to time in the intricate negotiations entailed. On both sides
every effort was made to avoid friction, and for the moment
they even steered clear of the rock of the "Recuperations.1'
The first serious conflicts arose over Sicilian questions, for
Frederick in the new organisation of his state began to regulate
Church matters after his own fashion. At the Diet of Capua he
had urged on his subjects the punctual payments of tithes to the
Church. Soon after he revived a Norman edict which forbade
the accumulation of lands under mortmain : churches and
monasteries might purchase land and receive it as gifts — later
CLERICAL ABUSES 141
the Emperor forbade this also — but they must part with it again
within a year a month a week and a day, otherwise, as Frederick
later expressed it, " the Church would ere long have bought up
the entire kingdom." These laws were quite customary and
roused no hostility against the Emperor.
Matters assumed a different complexion, however, when
Frederick threw down the gauntlet to the Sicilian episcopacy.
He was always ready to apply the surgeon's knife and cauterising
iron to get rid of sores and ulcers — the metaphor was a favourite
with him — and he embarked according to these principles on
a purification of the Sicilian clergy. He suspended Bishop
Arduin of Cefalu for his general conduct in squandering Church
property — the records of the trial prove that the accusations
were well founded — and soon after Archbishop Nicholas of
Taranto on similar grounds. The ex-Chancellor Walter of Pa-
lear, Bishop of Catania, whom Frederick had mistrusted of old
and whom he had sent out of the kingdom ostensibly with
reinforcements for the crusading army, did not venture to show
his face again in Sicily. He went from Damietta probably first
to Rome and on to Venice, where he finally died, it was said,
in utter poverty. The irregularities of the Sicilian clergy were
probably extreme : Frederick was obliged to imprison a large
number of the inferior clergy, and even the Pope had to remove
individual bishops such as those of Carinola and Squillace.
The bishops deposed by Frederick took refuge in Rome, which
gradually became the asylum of exiled Sicilians. In addition
to the three bishops, Count Thomas of Molise was there,
Roger of Aquila, Jacob of San Severino and the other barons,
presumably also the Count of Syracuse, Alaman da Costa and
King John of Jerusalem. These episodes contributed to
Honorius's irritation. He had acquiesced in the Emperor's
proceedings against the bishops at the time, but they did not
cease to rankle, and on occasion formed a subject of reproach.
The thing that ultimately provoked a heated correspondence on
both sides was the question of the episcopal elections in Sicily.
It has already been explained how vital was the so-called
" freedom of episcopal elections." One further consideration
should be added : at the same moment that the Curia set out
to tighten up the relationship between itself and the bishops
i42 RISE OF NATIONALISM m
throughout the Christian world, and convert them into im
mediate dependants of the Pope and his direct representatives,
a parallel movement was at work in the West, a development
of strong national self-consciousness in the various countries.
The Church's endeavour to subject episcopacy in each country
to the direct and immediate control of Rome ran violently
counter to this new tendency of the ancient Roman world to
resolve itself into individual nations.
On the other hand it also stood in the way of each individual
nation as it strove to consolidate itself into a unified state, for
everywhere the Church was a " state within a state." The
more because she was in no wise a purely spiritual force, but a
very material one, endowed with land and possessions, and in
the most important matters refusing allegiance to the state.
This situation led sooner or later to serious friction in every
country in Europe. Things came to a head in Sicily first,
because Frederick II was not only King of Sicily but also
Emperor. As Emperor he had a dual role to sustain. For the
preservation of world unity the Church's aims were the
Emperor's, for the Roman Emperor felt himself just as respon
sible for the oneness of the world as any Pope, but their views
diverged in this, that the Emperor fully recognised national
individuality— nay , was in the act of creating a new and well-knit
nation. Frederick's dual attitude had been latent from the
first ; its full extent began to be revealed when the evolution
of the Sicilian state made the question a vital one for him. A
permanent conflict that haunted Frederick all his days is here
seen in its beginning : it may be summed up in the formula
" an empire — and yet— nations.*' A tension which Dante felt
in yet acuter form : " individuals and yet a Roman Empire/*
It is interesting to note that in Germany, where national
feeling was less developed, the time was not yet ripe for conflict
with Rome, and Frederick was content to leave the Curia un
molested in its bishops' elections. But in Sicily, where he was
not only Emperor but King, he fought the Pope most strenuously.
As a mere boy he had crossed swords with Innocent III about
the Palermo elections. Episodes of this sort were bound to
multiply with time, and a glance at the constitution of the
Sicilian Church will show what importance these elections
BERARD OF PALERMO 143
assumed in Sicily. There was no other country where new
elections were so frequent, for this tiny land boasted zi arch
bishops and 124 bishops. The disproportion of this becomes
more manifest when we realise that at the Lateran Council of
1215, which was graced by all the spiritual dignitaries in Chris
tendom, 105 out of 405 participants came from the Sicilian
kingdom. The enormous number of archbishops is probably
rightly traced to the Byzantine influence in southern Italy.
The Greek archpriest develops into the Roman archbishop,
though the two are radically different, and "archpriest" con
noted no more than a priest independent of the Patriarch of
Constantinople. Vacancies occurred in Sicily with extra
ordinary frequency, and it was absolutely vital to the Emperor
to keep his bishoprics in trusty hands, that the bishops might
be as they had been in Norman days, organs of the king and
of the state. The excessive number of the bishops made this
in one way easier to achieve. The Sicilian bishop was not, like
his German brother, a mighty prince of the Empire, holding
extensive territories, but of humbler status, well suited to be a
Church or state official.
The episcopal type dear to Frederick's heart is well repre
sented by the Primate of the Sicilian Church, Berard of
Castacca, Archbishop of Palermo. To forestall an election
squabble with Frederick, over Palermo, Pope Innocent III had
entrusted the church of the capital to Berard, formerly Arch
bishop of Ban. From Frederick's point of view no more
fortunate choice could have been made. Archbishop Berard
of Palermo became quite indispensable to the Emperor, a second
Hermann of Salza. He had not the statesmanship of the
German Grand Master, but he was his superior in learning and
culture. He enjoyed the respect of the Roman Curia while
being whole-heartedly devoted to the Emperor. Ultimately no
weighty negotiation with the Pope could be conceived in which
the shrewd and reverend prelate did not represent the Emperor.
There was indeed no weighty event of any kind in which
Berard had not his share, so completely did he command the
Emperor's confidence. The services he rendered are innumer
able. Frederick himself wrote "... in danger of every sort
he stood by our side and many things hath he endured on our
144 SICILIAN BISHOPS in
behalf." Berard was one of the few churchmen who could
breathe the intellectual atmosphere of Frederick's court and
was able to hold his own in the literary activities of the courtiers.
Indeed it was he who discovered Piero della Vigna and brought
him to the imperial court. His greatest service, however — and
it was no slight one — was that he lived through the whole of
Frederick's life in closest proximity with him. As Bishop of
Bari he had been one of the household officers of the boy king,
He had accompanied him on his adventurous journey to
Germany. It was on Berard's summons that the Bishop of
Constance had opened the city gates ; it was Berard who repre
sented Frederick at the Lateran Council. He lived almost
continuously at the imperial court, and was destined to outlive
his master and administer to him the final sacrament. We have
no detailed knowledge of Berard's personality — he was the
Emperor's instrument and clung to his master through ban and
curse — but as the faithful and honourable priest who stood by
the Emperor from his boyhood to his dying bed he is one of the
most human of the secondary figures in the picture of Frederick's
life. No astounding achievement immortalises his name ; it is
enough that when great deeds were doing he was there.
Such will be roughly the type of prelate which Frederick II
liked to have, and there always were a considerable number
of such in Sicily, though none enjoyed the same intimacy as
Berard of Palermo. The only right remaining to the Emperor
under the Concordat was that of choosing such adherents for
episcopal vacancies — or rather of giving his concurrence only
to such candidates. The Concordat of the Empress Constance
had reduced the King's right to simple concurrence in the choice
made by the Chapter. The bishop thus chosen by the Chapter
and confirmed by the King could only officiate after final ap
proval by the Pope. Even this meagre privilege of the King's
was further whittled away by the Pope's revival of an ancient
" right of devolution." According to this a vacancy which
lasted over six months entitled the Pope to fill it immediately
himself, without reference to either King or Chapter. A
favourite practice of the Roman Curia was therefore to postpone
on the flimsiest pretexts the final confirmation of the bishop
till the six months had elapsed, and then simply to appoint
BITTERNESS OVER ELECTIONS 145
another man, whom neither King nor Chapter wanted, but who
best suited Rome. The Emperor, conversely, sought to exceed
his rights, and by promises or pressure to induce the Chapter
to choose a candidate of his proposing, an imperial physician
it might be, or notary — a procedure which the Curia did not
fail to challenge.
Things gradually came to such a pass that the mere recom
mendation of the Emperor damned any candidate in the eyes
of the Curia. In Capua, for instance, a certain dean, Hugo by
name, had been unanimously chosen and was recommended to
the Pope by Frederick — who did not apparently even know the
man personally — as " an educated, suitable man and a native
of the country." Thereupon the Pope rejected him.
In Nola Master Peronnus, a notary of the Emperor's, was
chosen, but a minority dissented and his appointment was not
confirmed. On the other hand the long vacancy in Salerno
is to be thus explained : Archbishop Nicholas of Ajello had
proposed his own successor. Now Nicholas was some relation
of Count Richard of Ajello, no great friend of Frederick's, and
had himself been an adherent of Kaiser Otto's and had rebelled
against the Law of Privileges. He had therefore fallen into
disfavour, sufficient grounds for Frederick on his part to reject
the proposed successor.
In Brindisi matters reached a climax. The unanimous choice
fell on a notary and household officer of the Emperor's, John
of Trajetto, a man well known to the Roman Curia. Frederick
had exerted himself most eagerly to secure this candidate's
appointment by the Pope, had even sent a special deputation
to Rome. It had, however, become almost a point of honour
at Rome to reject the Emperor's candidate. Honorius made the
excuse of a technical error in the election — it had taken place
three months after the death of the previous incumbent — and
refused John of Trajetto even when Frederick wrote again.
A similar state of affairs prevailed in Aversa, Acerno, Sarno,
Conza, Bari : as far as can be judged the Emperor never suc
ceeded in carrying the day.
Bitterness increased on both sides. Honorius reproached
Frederick with interference in the election in just such words
as Innocent had used to the boy of years ago : he had better
146 SERIOUS FRICTION m
be warned to avoid the evil practices of his ancestors whose
trespasses had brought it about that he, Frederick, was the last
scion of his race. The Emperor replied that Honorius was
seeking his destruction : this papal protection was not protec
tion but extinction. With extreme incisiveness he declared
that if the Pope would not confirm in office the bishops nomi
nated by the Emperor he might save himself the trouble of
sending other persons as bishops into the Sicilian kingdom, for
the Emperor on his side would henceforth refuse to receive the
men chosen by the Pope. He would give orders to close not
only the churches but the towns against them. That had all
the ring of an ultimatum, yet Honorius did not so interpret it,
but turned it aside with the comment that the young Emperor
was misled by evil counsellors, and swept off his feet by his
own youth. Such procedure, however, was bound to cause
unpleasantness. He requested the Emperor to apologise for
the unseemly utterances of his messengers — by which was
meant the unseemly tenor of the imperial letter itself. Whether
the Pope received his apology or not we do not know.
The Pope, however, set about filling the vacant sees after a
further warning to Frederick not to interfere with Church
affairs — a dangerous thing for laymen. Witness the Bible
example of Uzzah who put forth his hand to the Ark of the
Covenant of the Lord when the oxen shook it and God smote
him there for his error and there he died by the Ark of God.
The Pope would henceforth appoint his own shepherds for his
flocks. Even when the persons chosen were not in themselves
unwelcome to Frederick — Marinus Filangieri, for instance, was
a brother of the Emperor's marshal Richard Filangieri — he
nevertheless forbade their admission. The correspondence
between Pope and Emperor grew steadily more hostile, till at
last the hoarded wrath burst forth simultaneously on both sides,
just at the moment least convenient to the Emperor when he
was busy restoring order in Lombardy.
Frederick's early days were not to pass without his learning
the bitterness of his other enemies, the Lombard towns, for
whom he was as yet no match — largely because the Roman
Curia of the time was behind the Lombards.
LOMBARD SITUATION 147
The Treaty of San Germane had granted Frederick two
years' respite before the Crusade. He intended to utilise this
interval to round off all Western affairs before tackling the
problems of the Orient. The reorganisation of Sicily was
already more or less complete, and German problems were to
be regulated at a Diet which Frederick decided to hold in
Lombardy, so as to give full weight to his imperial authority in
those regions. He therefore invited the German princes and
King Henry to Cremona for Easter 1226, " and if you come for
no good reason but to see ourself , ourself will be well pleased
by sight of you," so he concluded his letter of invitation. The
Court agenda mentioned only very general topics : Restoration
in Italy of Imperial Rights : Eradication of Heresy : Prosecu
tion of the Crusade. Frederick particularly stressed the last
two items, which concerned Church affairs. Backed by the
united armed forces of Germany and Sicily he had good hope
of finding the Lombards docile and complacent.
The Lombards, however, had unfortunately noted the recent
re-assertion of royal rights in Sicily, and Frederick's " Restora
tion of Imperial Rights " rang ominously in their ears. The
normal status quo for Lombardy was laid down in Barbarossa's
Peace of Constance dating from 1183. For several decades no
Emperor's eye had been upon the Lombard towns, and there
was no question that they had quietly encroached on imperial
properties and on imperial rights, quite as seriously as the minor
powers had in Sicily usurped royal rights and property. The
Lombards might well dread another Law of Privileges with
more far-reaching effects than the Sicilian one. They had no
wish to take risks. Exaggerated reports reached them of the
mighty army that Frederick was gathering for his Lombard
Diet. This was decisive. With quick distrust the Lombards,
under the leadership of Milan, formed themselves into a
League which was joined by the majority of north Italian
communes.
It is most unlikely that Frederick had had any such Law of
Privileges in mtnd, for he was well aware that the Lombard
problem was very different from the Sicilian. He was here
opposed, not by a multitude of disconnected, mutually warring,
minor powers, but by a large number of homogeneous foes,
148 MILAN in
territorial powers who, not unlike the German princes, would
immediately rally to a common banner to repulse a common
enemy, all their mutual jealousies and squabbles notwithstand
ing. The Peace of Constance did not forbid a union of the
towns, but this revival of the ancient Lombard League was a
manifest act of hostility, provoked it is true by Frederick's
attitude, which in Lombard politics had gradually become more
and more obviously that of a partisan. Lombardy was in fact
split into two camps, and a non-parry Emperor was scarcely
possible. Traditional as well as personal bias determined his
choice of party.
Cremona and Milan strove for the hegemony of Lombardy,
just as Genoa and Pisa disputed the supremacy of the Medi
terranean. Milan was of old the most powerful of the Lombard
towns. The arrogance of the bishops who sat in the seat of
St. Ambrose rose in the eleventh century to actual rivalry with
Rome, as Frederick reminded the Romans, to spur them on to
humble the pride of Milan. Milan, moreover, was an ancient
coronation town. In quite recent times Henry VI had worn
there the crown of the Italian King. The people of Milan,
with justifiable pridey had been the first among the communes
to fight for freedom. Here for the first time the burghers and
the humbler aristocracy made common cause against the Great,
and had in the motta * achieved municipal unity. Milan was the
first town which quite early dared to defy imperial authority.
Having once talked of freedom, Milan under its consuls strove
for political independence and submitted only with extreme
distaste to any law, spiritual or temporal, emanating from a
higher power. This attitude on the part of its powerful citizens
of dual rebellion — against Church and Empire — made Milan
the focus of heresy and insurrection. Its territories were the
size of a dukedom, and no other Lombard town could compete
with it in wealth or power. The other towns also early de
veloped a taste for freedom, for independence and for territorial
aggrandisement. In spite of endless wars amongst themselves
they all willingly acknowledged the primacy of " the central
town " if outside aggression threatened their liberties and chal
lenged them to common resistance. This did not preclude
1 Motta is roughly : the revolutionary popular party. — Tr.
CREMONA 149
them from occasionally banding themselves together against the
oppressive superiority of Milan, or even lending Barbarossa a
helping hand when he destroyed the town in 1162. Such alli
ances between the towns did not denote any dream of a larger
unity. The polis was all in all to the Lombards as to the
Greeks, and this narrow-minded pre-occupation with solely
municipal affairs militated against all serious political thought,
and against any wish to subordinate their town to the overlord-
ship of the Roman Empire.
Not all the towns, however, followed Milan ; a proportion
held to Cremona. Tacitus's judgment seemed for many a
long day to hang like a curse over this town : bellts externis
intacta, civilibus infeltx. But from the ninth century on Cre
mona became powerful and rich and her ships sailed down the
Po to trade with Venice and even directly with Byzantium.
The first Italian town to be granted a town charter, as far as is
known, was Cremona, and since then the burghers whom
Otto III protected had in the main stood by the Empire. A
hundred years later, in 1098, the final seal was put for all time
on Cremona's loyalty. The Margravine Matilda, who had hi
her lifetime witnessed the great Canossa struggle, threw down
an apple of discord between Cremona and Milan when she
amplified a gift to the Cremonese by including the land between
the Adda and the Serio, the so-called " insula Fulcherii," and
the town of Crema. " In this year the fight for Crema began,"
declares the chronicler, and from this time onwards Cremona
was always on the side of the Emperors, for only they could
secure to the Cremonese the possession of the bequest by pro
tecting them against Milan who also laid claim to Crema. It
was important therefore for the Emperors to strengthen the
loyal communes, and those towns which from time to time for
one reason or another were enemies of Milan or of Milan's
satellites. The political groupings in Lombardy altered often,
and altered suddenly. But however greatly the following of
the two rival towns might change, one thing remained un
changed in Lombardy : the hate between Cremona and Milan.
Frederick II had to take up his position. Two ways were
theoretically open : he could hold himself aloof and above the
quarrels of the towns, if he could have found a formula to
150 "ABHORRED FREEDOM " m
satisfy all rivals, and thus have won the Lombard towns for
himself. This might in fact have been possible if Frederick
instead of ever and again seeking reconciliation with the aristo
cratic Church had made common cause with the Lombards
against the common enemy — the papacy. But an alliance of
the Empire with the tiers etat against the clergy — in other
spheres the greatest of Frederick's great achievements — had for
many reasons not yet risen above the Hohenstaufen's horizon in
the sphere of world politics. So only the second path lay open :
to take sides ; to espouse the cause of Cremona, and with her
help and her allies, in addition to the resources of Sicily — which
earlier emperors had not had at their disposal — and with Ger
man backing, to intimidate the opposite party, if possible with
out fighting, and so to restore imperial rights. The personal
factor was not wanting. Frederick on his first journey to Ger
many at seventeen had been hunted by Milan, whereas Cremona
had helped him in his need. He had pledged his faith to
her, confirming her title to Crema and the Isola Fulcheria.
Frederick apparently considered this old attachment to Cre
mona still of value ; at any rate he professed to feel himself still
bound by his early promise — by no means always his case — and
accepted now her friendly demonstration with a graciousness he
rarely showed at any time to any town. " This faithful town,
hereditarily loyal to the Empire," as he called it, was later even
permitted to play the godmother to Frederick's son, Conrad.
Yet another factor carried weight. The Emperor nourished
an instinctive constitutional hate against rebels in general, and
an inherited hate against Milan in particular. " No sooner had
we ascended against all the expectation of men, by the aid of
Divine Providence alone, the highest peaks of the Roman Em
pire, in the years of our ripening adolescence, in the glowing
power of mind and body . . . than all the acuteness of our mind
was continually directed to one end ... to avenge the injury
offered (by the Milanese) to our Father and our Grandfather
and to trample under foot the offshoots of abhorred freedom
already carefully cultivated in other places also." Thus the
Emperor, ten years later. Such abysmal hate, such lust for
vengeance, admits no argument. It is simply a fact to be
reckoned with. As early as 1219 in Germany Frederick had
RISE OF THE PLEBS 151
vowed to the Cremonese never to receive Milan into favour
without their concurrence. He soon delegated to Cremona
control over the affairs of Lombardy.
This was the major schism in northern Italy, and the Em
peror's attitude to it was already laid down. The mere fact
that he summoned his Diet to meet in Cremona showed the
enemy his hand. But in the tangle of divisions and feuds the
rivalry of the two groups of towns only represented one of many
cleavages. From somewhere about the turn of the century the
inhabitants of the towns had been divided by internal faction.
In the eleventh century burgher and inferior noble had made
common cause against margrave and count, and had wrung
from the great landowners the territories of the town. And
now the plebeians had risen against the inferior noble and the
town knight. In most towns two factions had developed,
the knightly party and the popular party, and in some cases
the similar parties of different towns had formed alliances.
This quarrel divided Lombardy horizontally into two fac
tions, between whom the Emperor must needs make his choice.
His attitude could not be merely to support the knights, though
in general of course they were pro-Emperor, while the plebeians
as the revolutionary section seemed naturally the Emperor's
foes. Matters were not however so straightforward and simple
as that. The knights were frequently anti-Emperor and the
plebeians the opposite. It even happened now and then — as
later once in Siena — that one of the Emperor's men cleverly
contrived to place himself at the head of the popular movement
and that the victorious popular party was thus the Emperor's.
In spite of the confusion, however, we can trace certain well-
defined principles that guided Frederick's conduct : in the
traditionally loyal towns like Cremona, Parma, Pavia he tried
to smooth out differences and establish peace, so as to secure
the support of these imperial cities as a whole. In the towns
which he felt to be wavering, and whose population as a whole
he could not hope to win, he sided with the knights. In
Piacenza, for instance, he broke up the plebeian party, declared
them rebels and outlawed them, while he recognised and pro
tected the potentially loyal knightly party and issued orders to
the neighbouring towns to support the knights of Piacenza. A
152 ATTITUDE OF THE TOWNS m
short-lived alliance even came to birth between the knights of
Piacenza and the imperial commune of Cremona. In the
actively hostile towns the Emperor set himself to fan the dis
cord as far as possible. It was a complicated policy, since
Frederick had to treat each town individually and could never
bring his direct, wholesale straightforward methods into play,
unless he were prepared to fight.
A sample correspondence will illustrate the radically different
points of view of the pro- and anti-Kaiser towns. If it is a
fabrication it is all the more illustrative. Florence wrote during
these years to the imperial town of Siena : " It is true that the
Emperor's Majesty being bound by no law enjoys the fulness
of power. Yet it is dependent on the law for life and must not
hanker after what is alien, lest it break the law and be itself
accused of injustice at the very time that it enforces obedience
upon others." Whereupon Siena writes : " Whereas it is the
property of the Roman Princeps to tower above others in peace
or war as victor, it is not to be tolerated that his subjects should
crave equally to be his equals. For if the condition of all men
were equal the name of Princeps would be an empty sham ;
there can be no superior without inferiors. And the law of
nations would have accomplished nothing, whereas it has estab
lished inequality and arranged ranks and grades."
It would not be easy to formulate more sharply the contrasts
in which the question of the Church's attitude to the parties is
bound up. For the aristocratic Church of the Middle Ages
must of necessity be as hostile as the Emperor to the popular
movement, which was asserting the freedom of the individual
alike against temporal and against spiritual authority. And so
in fact it was. Just before this, when the populace of Milan
rose against the bishop, the papal legate in Lombardy, Cardinal
Hugo of Ostia, assisted the knightly party against the people.
Frederick II, like his predecessors, always strove to preserve,
as far as he could, the feeble remnants of episcopal power
in the Lombard towns. In these matters he was, to all
appearance, hand in glove with the Pope, who went so far as
to excommunicate Milan and stigmatised it as " saturated with
the poison of heresy." Frederick had demonstrated his una
nimity with the Church on such matters by stiffening up, in
ROME AND THE LOMBARDS 153
March 1224, the edict against heretics which he had already
issued on the occasion of his coronation. Those condemned
as heretics by the bishop were summoned before a secular
tribunal, and the punishment for heresy was death by burning
or the amputation of the tongue, that further blasphemy might
be forestalled. These edicts were no mere " courtesies " from
Emperor to Pope ; they represented, as will be seen later, the
innermost conviction of Frederick, for whom the heretic was
synonymous with the rebel, who blasphemed the divine majesty
of the Emperor. Being at one with the Church on questions
of rebels and heretics Frederick had counted on considerable
support from the Church for his Lombard Diet,, the more so
as his agenda especially stressed the two items of heresy and
Crusade.
The Curia had to stand by him over the Crusade, but that
by no means implied taking an anti-Lombard line ; quite the
reverse ; politically the Church was driven into the Lombards*
arms. For if the Emperor were to succeed in establishing in
north Italy a power similar to that he had organised in Sicily,
the states of the Church would be hemmed in, north and south,
by imperial territories, and the Curia could foresee his next
move. The papal " Recuperations/' the central Italian pro
vinces of the Church, were menaced ; at a very minimum the
Adriatic strip, the March and Spoleto, but probably other sec
tions of the Church's land as well, would be commandeered to
give Frederick a corridor from south to north. Frederick had
let it be seen how sorely he craved these lands.
As long as the Lombards, however, resisted the Emperor, and
stood out against any reproduction in northern Italy of the
Sicilian monarchy, the Church was safe. The Curia therefore
could not possibly take the risk of helping the Emperor to break
down the opposition of the Lombard towns. Politically the
Church found the Lombard Confederation a valuable ally, and
in Rome the fact was welcomed that the League was organising
itself into a semi-state. The Confederation was renewed for
twenty-five years. All the confederate towns had annually to
renew the oath ; none were to conclude independent peace ;
and resignation from the league was to be considered as
"rebellion" and dealt with accordingly. The Emperor saw
154 ST. FRANCIS AND THE PEOPLE m
in the Confederation a rebel state within a state ; the Church
hailed it as a bulwark against imperial encirclement.
In questions relating to heresy and popular movements the
views of Emperor and Curia were by no means identical. As
regards the recalcitrant Roman plebeians they saw eye to eye on
many points, but the Curia was in touch with the Roman popu
lace in a way in which the Emperor was not. The Curia too
was willing enough to use the Emperor's sword for the eradica
tion of heresy, but felt by no means so exclusively dependent
on his good offices in the matter as Frederick liked to think.
Here quite a new factor enters in. The two new mendicant
orders aimed at reaching these two classes, plebeian and heretic,
and either luring them back into the Church or rendering them
innocuous. The democratic Franciscans and the heresy-hunt
ing Dominicans had recently sprung from the womb of the
Church in her old age. These two Orders lent a significance,
beyond the merely political, to the alliance between Lombards
and Curia. Without here pursuing the very varied activities
of the Orders in detail we may quote an episode which legend
records, that illustrates the sympathy existing between a man
like St. Francis and various strata of the populace. One day
when the saint was preaching in Perugia before a large crowd
the knights of the town invaded the piazza and began to joust
and to manoeuvre their horses, doing their best to disturb the
saint's discourse, whereupon the populace set upon them. For
the message of St. Francis was directed to the humbler towns
folk who enthusiastically clung to the apostle of poverty.
Such was in rough outline the tangled state of affairs in
northern Italy when Frederick set out to hold his diet in
Lombardy. To add to existing difficulties Frederick's quarrel
with the Curia over the episcopal elections in Sicily was just
then at its height. And, finally, his march to the north provoked
a quarrel with the Curia that nearly amounted to a final breach.
Without asking permission Frederick marched his troops right
through central Italy and, acting as if the Church only held
these territories from the Empire in fee, he enlisted auxiliaries
for his Lombard Diet. This procedure was no doubt a little
WRATHFUL CORRESPONDENCE 155
brusque. Frederick II, however, had not acted without
reflection. If the Pope had denied him permission the breach
would have been even more inevitable, and he would have
created a dangerous precedent for himself by appearing to
acknowledge that the Emperor had no right to inarch his troops
from Sicily into north Italy without papal sanction. Pope
Honorius now taxed Frederick with this march, reproached him
for ingratitude to the Church, and at last the long-repressed
resentment on both sides burst forth. Quousque tandem patientia
mea abutetur pontifex ! Such was the gist of Frederick's answer,
if we may anticipate an expression attributed to him later in
a reply in which he likened the Pope to Catiline.
Frederick poured out in a violent letter all his grievances
against the Curia : for his own part he owed the Church no
thanks ; in any help she had at any time accorded him she had
sought solely her own advantage. He on his side had met every
wish the Pope expressed. The Pope had welcomed to Rome
every enemy of the Emperor and every exile from Sicily ; he
had curtailed the Emperor's rights in Sicily ; he had obstructed
the Emperor's procedure against licentious priests ; he had
" lifted no finger " to ease the burdens of the Crusade that
rested on the Emperor's shoulders — and so forth.
Pope Honorius replied in a long document, refuting the im
perial letter point by point, a document that was a masterpiece
of style, beginning " strangely our letter smote upon thy mind
— so writest thou — . . . more strangely yet thy letter smote on
ours." Honorius omitted nothing, and when he came to speak
of the treatment Frederick had meted out to those who were
now refugees in Rome, especially the unfortunate King John
of Jerusalem, " whose only crime has been that they are still
alive," he took occasion to remind Frederick of his great pro
totype : " Thou wilt have read no parallel to these things in
the deeds of Julius Caesar, who spared Domitius in his own
despite and held Metellus to be unworthy of his wrath when
Metellus offered his breast to the sword. . . ." For all the
perfection of its form it was a spiteful document, into
which the Pope poured the full measure of his anger. The
ill-will of both reached its climax in these two letters — and its
end. Frederick answered very briefly, though he could not
156 CLOSING OF THE BRENNER m
refrain from a few sarcasms over the inordinate length of the
epistle. The Pope's long-winded letter had disinterred from
the papal storehouses so much material, old and new, that if a
womb so teeming should, from fresh imperial replies, again
conceive, it would bring forth another foetus like unto the first.
Frederick cherished the feelings of a pious son to an angry-
father, and therefore preferred to let the matter drop, if only
because the Pope had the advantage of him in the multitude of
his scholars and his scribes.
The Emperor's thus " coming to heel " coincided with the
complete failure of his Lombard adventure. A few words will
suffice to narrate the events. Frederick first sought to counter
the unexpectedly hostile attitude of the League by emphasising
his peaceful intentions and placing in the foreground his anxiety
about the Crusade. On the whole march he scrupulously
avoided coming into contact with any of the towns. This self-
restraint emboldened the Lombards ; they were no doubt also
informed of the serious friction with the Curia and so were
reassured that their worst foreboding was groundless — the Pope
and the Emperor were not going to proceed as one man against
them. They promptly exercised their sense of power. As
the German army under Bang Henry, approaching along the
Brenner road, had just reached Trent, the confederate towns —
of which Verona was one — closed the narrow defile and denied
passage to any person bearing arms. The German army,
which was wholly composed of cavalry, was probably not strong
enough to fight its way through, but in any case the use of force
would have been contrary to the Emperor's intentions — he had
no wish, nor indeed the means, to embark at the moment on a
Lombard war — he preferred to lodge a complaint against the
Lombards with the Pope. Meantime King Henry awaited
events in Trent. Without his German knights the Emperor's
forces were too weak to exercise even moral suasion, still less
serious practical pressure. So Frederick opened negotiations
with the Rectors of the Confederation, especially with reference
to the passage of the German party. Before opening the road
— the closing of which was an unprecedented arrogance — the
Lombard towns proposed such unacceptable terms that the
Emperor refused to negotiate further, in which he was unani-
1226 ABANDONMENT OF DIET 157
mously backed by the big men about him and numerous bishops
from Germany, Italy, Sicily and Burgundy. As repeated sum
monses to give in were in vain, the Emperor induced the bishops
assembled with him to excommunicate all the confederate towns
for hindering the Crusade, and for his part exercised the im
perial ban and declared the Lombards outlaws and traitors to
the Empire. By this he forbade all intercourse with them and
declared all schools and institutions closed — including the
University of Bologna. After months of delay that was the
only thing he was able to accomplish. He could only save his
face in the whole affair by consistently posing as the simple-
hearted crusader who had come to Lombardy not on his own
private business but on a mission for God and for the Church.
The Lombards' opposition had thus been directed not against
him but against the Church. By skilfully playing this role he
compelled the Church eventually to take his part. But for the
time being he had to let outlawry and excommunication suffice
him, and vengeance for many a deed of treachery — in Faenza
a knight had been murdered in mistake for Frederick — had to
be adjourned till another day. The Diet was never held at all.
A few German princes had joined him by way of Venice, but
King Henry and the bulk of the other German nobles had had
to return home from Trent after months of fruitless waiting.
The confusion in Lombardy was greater than ever and Frederick
had accomplished nothing. In July 1226 he began the return
journey to Sicily. His route was already threatened ; finally
Pisan troops came to fetch him and escorted him safely to their
town, where he halted a short time.
In spite of everything Frederick II found time during his
stay in Pisa to converse with a scholar whose writings were
already known to him. They discussed at length a number of
problems in Geometry and Algebra which were occupying
Frederick's mind. The scholar was Leonardo Fibonacci of
Pisa, the greatest mathematician of his time, indeed the greatest
mathematician of the Middle Ages, whom a Spanish scholar,
one Dominicus, introduced to the Emperor. Leonardo had
pursued his studies in Egypt and Syria, Greece and Spain, and
158 LEONARDO OF PISA m
was trying to introduce a new style of reckoning into Europe
" after the manner of the Indians " : reckoning with the Arabic
numerals and the zero. The problems which Frederick laid
before him through his court philosopher, Master John of
Palermo, are so difficult and technical that even to-day only a
mathematician can follow them. To the Emperor's admira
tion and delight Leonardo was able to solve them. He wrote
them down in a book for the Emperor, and henceforth main
tained contact with the scholars of the court — with Master
Theodore for instance, and, in particular, with Michael Scot,
who arrived shortly after at the imperial court.
These intellectual friendships were not the only outcome of
the stay in Lombardy. A number of German princes had come
round by Venice to join Frederick, and their presence had
brought the Emperor again into closer touch with German
affairs, with which, however, he did not attempt to interfere
except corroboratively. The year before, in 1225, Archbishop
Engelbert of Cologne, till then the Gubernator of Germany,
had been murdered, and Duke Lewis of Bavaria, one of the
guardians of young King Henry, had been appointed his
successor.
Further, without any connivance of the Emperor, the Danish
power had crumbled, and North Albingia as far as the Eider
had fallen to the Empire. This is the period, too, of the Golden
Bull of Rimini, which established the Order of Teutonic Knights
in Prussia to extend the power of the Empire in those regions.
For the moment, however, nothing was so vital to Frederick II
as to get the Lombard business disposed of, and for this he
needed the co-operation of the Roman Curia.
Many contemporaries contended that Pope and Curia were
solely responsible for the failure of the Lombard Diet. That
is to put the case too crudely. It is clear that Rome had watched
the progress of events not without malicious satisfaction, especi
ally as she reaped direct advantage from Frederick's embar
rassment. Frederick now acceded to every wish of the Pope's ;
acquiesced without a murmur in his choice of Sicilian bishops,
as if they had never had a difference of opinion on the sub
ject, and when famine broke out in Rome eagerly came to his
assistance with Sicilian corn.
POPE AS ARBITRATOR 159
With his characteristic adaptability Frederick changed his
tactics in a night, and leaped without transition from downright
brusquerie to affectionate docility. Nevertheless the Pope's
position was delicate. It seemed possible that the Emperor's
whole Crusade would be wrecked by the intransigence of the
Lombards if Frederick were to make the new developments a
pretext for further delay. The Pope was anxious to clear even
imaginary obstacles from the Emperor's path, so he bestirred
himself to achieve some workable compromise in Lombardy by
Acting as go-between. It was no easy task. Honorius did not
want to forfeit the Lombards' support against the Emperor ; on
the other hand they were most manifestly in the wrong and
had had no shadow of justification for the closure of the
Brenner road. After lengthy negotiation a temporary accommo
dation was arrived at, thanks to Frederick's placability. The
Pope would release the confederate towns from his ban, the
Emperor would rescind his edict of outlawry, and the Lombard
League would keep the peace with the imperial towns, Cremona
and the rest. The status quo ante which the Emperor had before
found unsatisfactory was thus in effect restored, and Frederick
had received no reparation or apology for the insult offered him.
The Emperor shut his eyes for the moment to this flaw in
the Pope's arbitration and declared himself — in the interests of
the Crusade — willing to accept this provisional award. He
could, however, no longer blind himself to the political alliance
of Lombards and Pope, whose embrace drew closer and closer
in proportion to the growth of the Emperor's power. From
the imperial standpoint he justifiably regarded this alliance of
the Pope with heretics and rebels, enemies alike of Church and
Empire, as treason to the Church herself — treason that is to the
aristocratic medieval Church. Frederick could not feel other
wise, and in his wrath at this betrayal he could justify to himself
and to the world his fight against the papacy. Indeed his faith
in his mission and in the justice of his cause was mainly based
on the conviction that this " incestuous " coalition of Church
and heretic undermined the God-ordained constitution of the
world. This was a purely aristocratic constitution founded on
the unity of the two Swords — the spiritual and the temporal —
and the unity of the two monarchs : Emperor and Pope.
160 FREDERICK AND FRANCIS m
Frederick would have been unreservedly in the right in
talking of treachery if nothing but papal aggrandisement had
prompted this unnatural rapprochement between the Curia and
the townsfolk of Lombardy, for which the Pope finally threw
over the Emperor and therewith the unity of the spiritual and
temporal worlds. Political advantage certainly held the fore
ground ; but behind the scenes, behind Lombards and papacy,
a new world-power was at work, a power against whose visible
warriors Frederick II consciously fought, against which itself
he fought his life long all unknowing, and growing thereby in
stature : Francis of Assisi and the new Christ image he had
evoked.
Frederick grew in the conflict with Francis of Assisi, and the
course of his imperial life will demonstrate the manner of his
growth. Francis of Assisi, the greatest contemporary of this
last Hohenstaufen, was the bearer of the strange, mysterious
power which Frederick in his cradle was destined to rebel
against, and in reaction against which he was to mobilise all
the forces of the world. Abbot Joachim of Flora had years
ago prophesied the coming of power and counter-power : the
founder of an order should bring again the age of Christ and
the Apostles. The Church should renew her youth and an
Emperor should be the Church's scourge. Following the myth,
Abbot Joachim had hailed the son of Henry VI as the future
Castigator, and Confusion-bringer, the herald of Anti-Christ.
The inference was clear — a renewal of Christ must necessarily
beget the Anti-Christ.
Legend tells us of a meeting of the two great foes. Some
where about 1222, as Frederick II held court in Bari, St.
Francis had come thither with holy exhortation to warn the
people of the dangers of sin, and to warn the nobility of the
dangers of the court. The encounter between the young vic
torious king and the man who had taken Lady Poverty to wife
is humanly akin to the meeting of Alexander the Great with
the Cynic Diogenes. Legend assigns to Frederick the role of
the tempter. He sought to undermine the celebrated continence
of the holy man by the wiles of a lovely woman, but when this
attempt was vain, and the Emperor saw that " his practice was
even as his precept," he dismissed his imperial retinue and
FRANCIS OF ASSISI 161
spent many hours in an earnest tete-a-tete, listening attentively
to what the saint had to tell for the salvation of the soul.
Not long after, in 1223, the final Rule of the Brothers Minor
was confirmed by the Pope, and when Francis of Assisi died three
years later in 1226 the zeal that fired him had communicated
itself to tens of thousands. What Francis of Assisi brought was
heresy dressed in canonicals ; his first appearance was closely
allied to that of the heretics, " The Poor Men of Lyons," and
indeed to the Albigensians, with whom the Church for many
years waged bloody war in Provence. The heretics had spread
a dangerous doctrine summed up in the famous phrase " to obey
God rather than men," maintaining the communion of the
individual soul with God without the mediation of the Roman
priest, without the need of sacrament. To combat this here
tical doctrine Pope Innocent III had magnified the position of
the priest, and reasserted the principle that the layman could
not forego the priest's mediation. The only difference between
St. Francis and the heretics was that he recognised the mediation
of the priest as of right, though no man had less need of priest
than he. He even brought " these heretical tendencies " into
the service of the Church by himself bringing the supreme
sacrifice of submitting to the church universal.
Francis of Assisi was canonised in 1228, a couple of years
after his death. Uncounted were the miracles that he per
formed. The miracle with which we are here concerned seems
to lack heavenly magic and seraphic glamour, but in compen
sation it reveals Francis to us as a man, a complete man, a figure
which to-day is frequently forgotten in mawkish sentimentaliz
ing over the tender, childlike saint. And this in spite of his
" royally independent " attitude to the Pope— the word is
Dante's — in spite of his manly opposition to the Church ; in
spite of his forbidding the Brothers to read the Holy Scriptures
for beauty — for the holy is above and beyond both the ugly and
the beautiful ; in spite of his belonging to that company of the
great whose holiness lies in spartan discipline against the " all
too venal flesh."
The wounds of the Saviour, which he bore in the body, were
less painful to him than the terrible oppression which weighed
on him when he compelled his free soul, dwelling in, free and
1 62 HUGO OF OSTIA m
direct communion with God, into the rigid, ruthless formalism
of the Roman hierarchy. This constriction which the heretics
escaped by forming independent groups outside the Church,
Francis voluntarily accepted — though he felt it more pro
foundly and suffered under it more severely than others. He
knew that the personal immediate one-ness of the Soul with
God was the loftiest aim, but held that nevertheless the Papacy
was the necessary means. None of his contemporaries was so
full as was St. Francis of high explosive forces to disrupt the
Church, but though at first he would hear nothing of the hier
archy and forbade his brothers to accept privilege from her or
exercise her offices, yet he recognised, hi contrast to the heretics,
one universal Church, and forced his wide, nature-loving,
sublime spirit into the narrow, rigid legalism of the hierarchy.
This opposition corresponds to that which Frederick, his
worldly counterpart, had begun to conjure up hi the worldly
sphere : the tension between the individual and the world-wide
Roman Empire. With Dante the man is born who consciously
suffers in both conflicts.
Francis found a means of incorporating in the Church and
utilising for her service the hitherto decried egotistical tenden
cies of the heretics. The founder of the Franciscans might not
easily have accomplished this single-handed. He had a friend
at hand, a Cardinal of the Roman Church whom he placed as
Protector over the Order, Hugo of Ostia. The Cardinal, a
priest almost overladen with scholastic wisdom and learned lore,
was poles asunder from the original, creative Francis. What
drew him to the saint was his yearning for simplicity, for aban
donment, for mystic rapture which the cares of this world and
the duties of a Cardinal's office put continually and ever further
beyond his reach. The mystic vein was still alive in Hugo
of Ostia : in his youth he had been filled with admiration
for Abbot Joachim of Flora—the " John " of the Franciscan
gospel — and had founded two monasteries in Florence out of
his private means. It was Hugo of Ostia who by his drafting
of the last Rule of the Order introduced the founder's spirit into
the Roman Church. It was he who skilfully kept the Fran
ciscan spirit that filled north Italy alive in the penitential
brotherhoods lest it should evaporate or — what was even more
1227 POPE GREGORY IX 163
probable — in that dangerous north Italian soil, degenerate into
heresy, from which indeed it ultimately sprang. Hugo of Ostia
arranged and organised, created centres for the brotherhoods
in all the towns, and so turned to the Church's advantage that
passion for individuality that was a feature of the time and
affected by the heretics. The alliance between Papacy and
Lombards on other sides than the merely political was therefore
a product of Cardinal Hugo's labours : a man whose influence
can often be traced in the later measures of the aged Pope
Honorius.
The truce effected between Kaiser Frederick and the
Lombards was destined to be the last act of Honorius III. He
died shortly after, in March 1227, while the Emperor was about
to start on the Crusade. Cardinal Hugo of Ostia, the friend
of Francis of Assisi, sometime Legate in Lombardy, succeeded
him. He was a Conti, a near relative of Innocent III, under
whose influence he had grown up. As Pope he chose the sug
gestive name of Gregory IX. With the coming of this elderly
opponent, who united in his person all the anti-imperial forces
of his time, Frederick IPs youth ended. He must prepare for
the worst and strain every nerve to build up speedily an all-
embracing imperial world, ready to face the foe.
IV. THE CRUSADE
Rendezvous in Brindisi, 1227 Plague Frederick falls
111 and turns back Hostility of Gregory IX Excom
munication Gregory's entente with Lombards —
Loyalty of Rome to Frederick Frederick's first mani
festo Frederick sails for East, June, 1228 Gregory
attacks Sicily Frederick recovers Cyprus Lands at
Acre Treaty with al Kamil ; ten-year truce Saracen
chivalry Treachery of Templars Influence of East
on Frederick Entry into Jerusalem, March 17, 1229,
and Self-Coronation, March 18 Jerusalem manifesto
Frederick lands at Brindisi, June, 1229 Last scenes
in Palestine Exeunt papal troops from Sicily Attitude
of Gregory IX ; truce Peace of Ceperano
IV. THE CRUSADE
IT has at all times been the case in Western history that none
might reach the heights of world dominion save the Conqueror
of the East, the man who brought the Orient into his Empire.
It seems almost a natural law that each World Ruler must renew
his youth in the land of the rising sun, and return thence
crowned with glory to build up his Western power. World
monarchs have been few, but all have brought from the East
the authority and the halo of a God. From the moment that
the Hohenstaufens began to dream of world power the Crusade
became their proudest ambition.
Soon after the first Franco-Norman Crusade of Godfrey,
Bohemund and Tancred, St. Bernard called men to the second.
The leaders of the Christian host were the Hohenstaufen Conrad
III with the King of France. Twenty years later Barbarossa
deliberately treated Emperor and Crusader as synonymous
terms. His first step was the canonisation of Charlemagne, and
shortly afterwards he commissioned a monk of Aix to write
the Legenda KaroU Magni, in which much space was given to
Charles, the Crusader, and his Pilgrimage to the Holy Land.
Charlemagne's wholly utilitarian campaign against the Moors
of Spain had gradually been sublimated by legend into a
Crusade. The legend was French in origin, but Barbarossa
eagerly imported it, and with further Christian-imperial em
bellishments gave it currency in Germany. Many a dream
of the time he thus fulfilled and many a dream he conjured up.
The Western world was waiting, with bated breath, till an
Emperor of the West should make his entry into Jerusalem,
Ever new prophecies hinged on the great event : he who rides
into Jerusalem as King will bring the long-awaited Reign of
Peace before the Anti-Christ shall come. Toledo was the
medieval capital of prophecy, and her astrologers announced
that after plague and earthquake the days of Islam should be
numbered ; while Sibylline sayings ran : " An Emperor of the
167
168 RECRUITING iv
East shall in Jerusalem meet an Emperor of the West and the
dry tree shall send forth green shoots when the Emperor of
the West shall hang his shield upon it as the token of his
law-giving." Such prophetic utterances gained in strength and
pervasiveness, and men looked towards the Emperors' Crusades
with hope. In spite of his age, Barbarossa had not hesitated
to take on him the highest duty and proudest privilege of an
Emperor when the Sultan Saladin conquered Jerusalem in
1 187. At his departure men hailed the aged King as a " Second
Moses " who was to lead the host of the chosen into the
Promised Land : it was only granted him to see the land of
promise from afar. His mighty son, Henry VI, was also
destined not to enter the Royal City as Christian Emperor : no
German Emperor yet had trodden the sacred soil.
Frederick II began where his ancestors left off. Not only
did the Crusade represent his services to the Church, his duty
as Roman Emperor — a new crown awaited him in Jerusalem.
Moreover, the East was for him no magic land of wonders as
it had been to his ancestors ; it was the spiritual home of
a mind well versed in oriental lore. Frederick made most
extensive preparations for his imperial crusade. He had sent
on in advance Count Thomas of Aquino to act as Regent of his
Syrian kingdom. He had succeeded by great efforts in kindling
once more crusading enthusiasm in the West, not by inspired
preaching : his agents numbered no St. Bernard, no Hermann
of Salza in their ranks. The Emperor's promises, however, and
the Emperor's gold, lavishly bestowed on all who enlisted, were
not without their power to lure men to the Holy Land. Frede
rick not only promised free transport to princes ^ knights and
esquires, but made them generous cash advances. He had
thus attracted a number of German princes, most important of
them all Landgrave Lewis of Thuringia, the husband of St.
Elizabeth, who arrived in Frederick's Sicilian kingdom in August
1227 with an entire crusading army. Pilgrims of every German
race crossed the Alps in numbers and travelled to Brindisi,
the port of embarkation. The Frisians preferred the long sea
route round Spain as did the English who, under several bishops,
had responded to the call in thousands. By a generous issue
of indulgences the Church had lent the necessary weight to
PLAGUE IN CAMP 169
Frederick's recruiting campaign. Thus, enticed by the favour
able offers, stream after stream of pilgrims poured ceaselessly
into Brindisi. A few turned back en route y but they did not
preceptibly reduce the masses who poured on. Many of the
pilgrims had travelled by way of Rome. A swindler, disguised
as Vicar of the Pope, took up his station at the gate of St. Peter
offering to release the pilgrims from their vows, without detri
ment to their indulgences, for the sum of four silver marks. The
Romans looked on this comedy with great amusement and did
not interfere. It was weeks before the Pope, who was in Anagni,
heard of the affair and hastily put the "vicar " out of action.
.It would have been no bad thing if more pilgrims had bought
themselves off in Rome. We cannot attempt even an approxi
mate estimate of actual numbers, but gradually an appalling
horde of crusaders had accumulated in the pilgrims' camp at
Brindisi — immensely more than the Emperor had calculated on
or provided for. In spite of all preparations the ships were
insufficient ; the pilgrims ran out of food — which, in any case,
had not been amongst the things Frederick had promised.
The ship room, however, was destined to prove in the end more
than sufficient— indeed ships remained empty behind — for in
the middle of August a terrible plague broke out to which the
Crusaders succumbed in shoals, while it was said that tens of
thousands fled from the plague-camp and scattered over Italy.
No one could be held responsible for this outbreak : many a
German army before had perished in the same way in the August
heat of southern Italy, and no modern observer needs to seek
any further cause than the herding together of thousands of
pilgrims, unaccustomed to the food, climate and conditions of
the south. Many of the German nobles also died of the disease,
and finally the Emperor himself caught it. In spite of illness
he superintended the embarkation of the first two squadrons
in person, and then just before the third division of the fleet was
to start, which was to take him and Count Lewis of Thuringia,
he betook himself with his friend to the small island of St.
Andrea outside Brindisi harbour to try to recover by escaping
the poisoned air. For the Landgrave, his chief assistant in the
undertaking, had also been attacked. In spite of everything
they both embarked on the Qth of September in the hopes that
iTo GREGORY AND FREDERICK iv
the sea air and the sea journey would cure them. Two days
after Count Lewis died, and the Emperor took the advice of his
doctors and the German Grand Master, in which the Patriarch
Gerold of Jerusalem concurred, and landed again in Otranto,
postponing his Crusade till after his complete recovery. He
handed over the chief command to the Duke of Limburg and,
promising to follow in the Spring with fresh contingents, he
went off to the Baths of Pozzuoli to seek a cure. He imme
diately despatched two court judges to the Pope at Anagni to
announce what had happened and to excuse his defection.
The Emperor's relations with Pope Gregory IX during the
few months of the new pontificate had been friendly. Frederick
had, on several occasions, gone out of his way to gratify the
Pope, and there existed at the moment no grounds for irritation.
The Emperor had started on his Crusade according to agreement,
and Gregory IX, while a Cardinal, had always seemed parti
cularly favourable to the erstwhile protege of the Church.
Not so many years before he had even called the Hohenstaufen
"the Church's beloved sapling." The Pope's benevolent
attitude had, however, undergone a radical change. Perhaps
his intimacy with St. Francis had sharpened his senses to detect
potential foes, perhaps he had naturally a very delicate percep
tion ; be that as it may, Pope Gregory IX was the first fully to
realise the immense danger latent in Frederick II which no
one else yet suspected. Gregory was not a real statesman
but an astute diplomat with an eye for all political cabals, and
he suddenly detected — perhaps during the days of the Lombard
Diet — the dawning of a new danger that immediately threatened
the States of the Church. For the Patrimony blocked the
Emperor's passage from south to north, and if the Emperor
attained sufficient power the papal territory would be in certain
danger. The Pope, judging from Frederick's early career,
could cherish no hope of making the Emperor a docile tool of
the Curia : he saw only one possible line of action, he must at
all costs strive to keep him down. From the first moment of
his power Pope Gregory's one aim was the humiliation — if not
the annihilation — of Frederick II.
SEPT. 1227 EXCOMMUNICATION 171
Gregory IX was not the man to flinch from the struggle.
Though an old man he was still strong and handsome ; he was
a priest who knew the art, and loved to practise it, of enhancing
the impressiveness of his person by pomp and ceremony :
tiara-crowned, a papal Imperator. The wild fire of his youth
still burned in the aged man and flamed up, now in the ecstatic
mysticism of a Francis of Assisi, now in passionate unbridled
hate towards Frederick II. This natural bent, reinforced by the
recognition of threatening danger, make him ere long the aggres
sor. For Frederick had nothing to gain and much to lose by a
conflict with the Church. Pope Gregory felt himself by stern
necessity compelled to compass the destruction of the Hohen-
staufen. He seized the first opportunity of compelling the foe
to fight.
His weapons and methods were for the most part unattrac
tive : slight untruths, imputations, calumnies : they were often
too transparent and produced an ugly impression, robbing the
Pope's procedure of every shadow of right, especially as no
one but himself recognised the deeper necessity of the struggle.
The obstinate old man, drunk with hate, pursued his end with
singleness of aim to his last hour, indifferent to the fact that he
was called a " heretic," that he was forsaken by those nearest
him, until he became — for all his petty dishonesties — not only
a dangerous enemy but a great one.
Here was his first big opportunity, and Gregory launched
forthwith a savage attack on Frederick. It will have been the
1 2th or 1 3th September that the Emperor decided to halt in
Otranto ; on the i8th the Pope nominated several new Lom
bard cardinals to strengthen his hand ; ten days later he ex
communicated Frederick. He had not received the imperial
messengers, still less given them a hearing. The Pope was
entirely within his rights in excommunicating Frederick. In
accordance with the agreement of San Germano the Emperor
was declared unreservedly under the ban if for any reason
whatsoever he failed to keep the appointed date, August 1227.
In consideration of his illness Gregory could, of course, have
given him dispensation, but he was fully entitled to exercise
the ban, and Frederick II always recognised the right. There
was no dispute as to the facts : the Emperor had not started —
173 PAPAL MISREPRESENTATIONS iv
the reason was irrelevant — he had therefore incurred the
penalty. Frederick was the very man to understand that facts
should weigh heavier with the Pope than reasons or motives.
Gregory, however, looked at neither the one nor the other.
He paid no heed to the fact of the Emperor's illness ; he would
neither see nor hear the numerous witnesses ; he immediately
pronounced it to be counterfeit. The simple truth might have
sufficed him. Frederick had failed to keep his engagement ;
Frederick was therefore excommunicate. The whole Christian
world would have understood. People were tired of the re
curring postponements of the imperial Crusade and none too
greatly prejudiced in Frederick's favour, and " public opinion "
was, in those clearsighted days, a potent weapon, dear alike to
Pope and Emperor.
Actual events, however, played a small part, and baseless
accusations a large one, in the envenomed encyclicals of the
Pope. Pope Honorius shared the blame of specifying the
month of August as the date of starting. He and the Emperor
were calculating how to secure the whole autumn and winter
for the Syrian campaign, and they gave too little thought to the
dangers of the late summer heat in Southern Italy. The choice
of Brindisi as starting point was a perfectly natural one. It was
traditionally a favourite port for the Orient, and habitually used
by the Venetians before leaving the Adriatic for the Mediter
ranean. Ignoring these things Gregory IX represented matters
to the world as if Frederick's mismanagement of his Sicilian
kingdom — the papal fief— had been so gross that he was driven
to the choice of the most unhealthy of all Sicilian harbours ;
further, that he deliberately chose the most unhealthy month of
the year for setting out ; farther, that he intentionally supplied
too few ships and intentionally detained the pilgrims, and was
therefore the guilty cause of the Great Death. In later years
Gregory went even further and accused Frederick not only of
intentionally slaying the pilgrims by the plague, but of having
poisoned Count Lewis of Thuringia. On this theory Frederick
himself was suffering from mental not bodily illness. The
Emperor had been unwilling to tear himself from the luxuries and
lusts of his kingdom and had sacrificed to them the Holy Land.
Gregory imparted still further information to the Christian
DELIBERATE BREACH 173
world : the Emperor was also to blame for the catastrophe of
Damietta and the Nile (Frederick had in fact forewarned the
Pope of the dangers incurred), he had allowed his followers to
loot the town and then surrendered it to the Sultan. From the
first he had failed to fulfil his undertakings about the new
Crusade : he had not only been short of ship room — which was
true — but had made no arrangements for the care of the pil
grims ; the thousand knights which he was to provide he had
not provided ; the 100,000 ounces of gold which he was to pay
he had not paid. The Sicilian bishops and the Sicilian Admiral
Henry of Malta hastened to inform the Pope that their master
had sent considerably more than a thousand knights to Syria ;
that the gold had been paid ; that the Emperor had made him
self responsible for the transport of the pilgrims, but not for
their maintenance. They were also able to remind the Pope
that the Lombards had failed to send the 400 knights which
they had undertaken to do under the Pope's arbitration award
— the only penalty they were to pay for blocking the mountain
road. But the bishops' protests bore no fruit, the Pope simply
reiterated his excommunication of the Emperor.
Meanwhile Frederick had stated that he was prepared to
undergo any Church penances that might be assigned him as
an amende honorable, and renewed his promise to sail the fol
lowing May. He looked on the ban as the usual formal Church
penalty incurred by dilatory Crusaders which was always re
scinded on due penance being performed. Pope Gregory had
no shadow of an excuse for refusing absolution to a penitent
offender willing to make amends. But the Pope had other
schemes brewing and was determined to continue the ban, so
he took up an entirely new line of attack : there was soon no
more talk of the abandoned Crusade save as a side issue ; the
front of the Emperor's offending was his administration of
Sicily, the papal fief ; his enslavement of the Sicilian Church ;
quarrels long since disposed of ; the banishment of the barons,
and finally a mass of new, baseless accusations, some of which
can be proved to have been entirely false. Pope Gregory had no
wish to find a solution of the conflict ; he did his best to make
the breach complete. Frederick II could have his absolution
only on condition of accepting papal tutelage in Sicily. This he
i74 THE ROMAN MOB iv
could not conceivably submit to, and reconciliation was there
fore for the time being impossible.
Pope Gregory's aim was probably to create so many diffi
culties for the Emperor in the West that an imperial Crusade
in the following May would be a sheer impossibility. If
Frederick again failed to sail, public opinion would be behind
the Pope if he should resume the Church's fief of Sicily, or
even depose the recreant Emperor, as Innocent had once de
posed the Welf . Lombardy was the place to make difficulties :
the Pope began to get into touch with the Lombards. He had
completely overlooked their failure to provide a contingent for
the Crusade and had appointed some Lombard cardinals : the
entente now went still further. Frederick proposed to sum
mon the German princes to a Diet in Ravenna in March to
discuss the breach with the Pope. The Lombards, at Gregory's
instigation, threatened again to bar the road, so the Emperor
was forced to abandon the project. The understanding be
tween Gregory IX and the Lombard League, which now em
braced almost the whole of Lombardy except. Cremona and
three or four other towns, grew and flourished till it blossomed
into a formal alliance. The Pope's one thought was how best
to hinder Frederick's enterprise ; he therefore prompted his
Lombard allies to seize and plunder any Crusaders who crossed
their territories on the way to join the Emperor.
Such were the Pope's first preparations. It was not all plain
sailing for him, however. Maundy Thursday was the usual
day for proclaiming excommunications ; when Pope Gregory
renewed the ban against Frederick II an unedifying scene fol
lowed. The Roman town nobility, led by the Frangipani, a
family whose support Frederick had won, stirred up the Roman
populace against their Bishop ; on Easter Monday during mass
the people mobbed the Pope, and their attitude became so
threatening that Gregory had difficulty in extricating himself
and escaping to the Lateran. But the mob were roused and
would not tolerate his presence in the city, so that he was forced
to accept a safe conduct and fly to Rieti.
For a long time Frederick II was silent under all the Pope's
attacks ; he hoped at first that the breach would soon be healed.
At last he decided that he must defend himself against the
FREDERICK'S FIRST MANIFESTO 175
accumulated accusations and reproaches, and now on his side
began to issue circular letters to the world — his first. In con
trast to the Pope's effusions the Emperor's were accurate and
calm : they rehearsed without betraying heat the actual facts
of the Brindisi happenings and the conduct of the Pope.
Frederick II had no wish to widen the breach which, as a
chronicler phrased it, " confused almost the whole Christian
world with new and unaccustomed miseries." He kept him
self well in hand. Only towards the very end of his first letter
is there a trace of feeling and appeal, when he solemnly enters
a protest before " heaven and the circuit of the earth,'* and
begs the recipients of his letter, the kings and princes of Europe,
the bishops and nobles of Germany : " pray cause this our
present letter to be read aloud and listened to with honour and
respect, so that from its contents the certainty of our innocence
may be clear to all, and clear also the shame which is being
done to us and to our Empire." A remarkable reception
awaited the imperial letter in Rome, his " capital city." The
Senate and People of Rome insisted that the Court judge,
Roffredo of Benevento, should publicly read the Emperor's
letter from the Capitol.
The Emperor's aim in issuing his manifestos was to get back
to facts. He did not plead that his excommunication was un
justified ; he emphasised that he had incurred it solely on
account of the non-fulfilment of his crusading vow. For the
Pope was deliberately obscuring the issue, and Frederick was
bent on bringing it again to light. To rob the Pope of his
weapons Frederick solemnly undertook before all the world to
sail early in the following year, " unless indeed it be — which
God forfend — that the new-awakened bitterness of this feud
should hold us back against our will from such a holy task."
The allusion here was, of course, to the papal intrigues which
Frederick exposed in detail in two subsequent letters : the
Pope, in the sight of the assembled people had taken the
Milanese, the Emperor's enemies, into favour ; the Pope had
issued orders to take up arms against the Emperor ; the Pope
had already begun to foment insurrection in Sicily against its
king. It was indeed true that Gregory IX had forbidden the
Sicilian clergy to help the Emperor in any way with his new
176 FREDERICK SETS SAIL iv
preparations, and that he was now threatening to release
Frederick's subjects from their oaths of fealty unless the
Emperor would obey the Curia. The Emperor took care to
keep his friends informed of the facts : the Pope refused to
accord him the usual Crusader's blessing on his departure for
the Holy Land ; he refused to inform the venerable Archbishop
Albert of Magdeburg, the imperial envoy, what penance or
amends he would be prepared to accept. The gravest charge
against the Pope, and one to which Gregory could find no
answer, was reserved for the last. " With the moneys which he
has received to aid the Crusaders in Christ's work this Romish
Priest entertains mercenaries to molest us in every way."
Frederick was well aware that the best his writings could
accomplish was to place matters in a certain light, and that he
must show his intentions " not with words but with deeds."
Only thus could he ward off the Pope's attacks and perchance
even turn the papal weapons against the Pope himself : by his
action expose the Pope's machinations and give his words the lie.
Nothing should now detain him from the Crusade, not even
Gregory's " devilish inspiration " in forbidding him to set out
till he had been released from the ban. The Pope's tactics
were too obvious : the excommunicated Emperor must not
start, he refused to lift the ban, he refused to state what amends
would be acceptable. If Frederick stayed behind the Pope
had won : a new procrastination would justify the Pope's
procedure. It was in the circumstances a clever move of the
Emperor's to let nothing detain him. Only some visible act
could make him again master of the situation : in the spring
he sent on in advance his Marshal, Richard Filangieri, with
500 knights to the Holy Land, held himself .a Diet in Barletta
at which he appointed Reginald of Urslingen, Titular Duke of
Spoleto, as Regent of Sicily. He then embarked on his galley
and at the end of June set sail from Brindisi, having just received
favourable news from Syria.
" We have just left Brindisi for Syria and are speeding along
before a favourable wind with Christ our Leader . . . , " so the
banned Emperor announced his journey to the world.
POPE INVADES SICILY 177
No one had been expecting the Emperor's departure, least
of all Gregory IX. His stiffhecked implacability put him into a
very painful position : " We do not know whose foolish counsel
he hearkened to, or, better : what devilish cunning betrayed
him into secretly quitting the harbour of Brindisi without pen
ance and without absolution, without anyone's knowing for
certain whither he has sailed." The fact that he saw himself
placed in the wrong by no means inclined Gregory to give in,
rather the reverse. Now that he knew the Emperor far away
he had a free hand in the West. No sooner had he received
tidings of Frederick's landing in Syria — whence a sudden return
was not to be feared — than he opened the long-prepared war :
in the Empire and in Sicily he released all subjects from their
oath, and then sought to set up a rival king in Germany. He
found himself another Welf , but his protege quickly thought
better of the offer and opined " he had no wish to die the
death of his uncle, Kaiser Otto IV." In other ways, too, the
Pope's German plans missed fire. The secular princes and
the bishops remained faithful to their openhanded Emperor,
especially as there was nothing particular to be done for him
at the moment : they were completely indifferent to the papal
ban which extended to their sixteen-year-old King Henry VII,
and by the time the news of Syrian victories began to penetrate
to Germany even the common people were criticising the Pope's
intriguing ways : " The Pope would seem to be possessed by a
devil," " his head is ailing, hence he is obstinate." Another
characterises Gregory's conduct as an abhorred sign of the
decay of the Church, a third exclaims : " Christian folk will
suffer from it till the Judgment Day." What aroused the
greatest indignation against Pope Gregory throughout Ger
many and everywhere else in the world was his behaviour in
Sicily. The Emperor's regent, Reginald of Spoleto, took the
Pope's release of Frederick's subjects from their oath to be a
declaration of war and invaded the March and his own earlier
dukedom of Spoleto with Sicilian and Saracen troops — perhaps
exceeding his instructions in so doing. Whereupon the Pope,
who had long since made full preparations, invaded the king,
dom of Sicily with his own soldiers — the first army to fight as
Soldiers of the Keys under the banner of Peter — supported by
i78 POPE'S UNPOPULARITY iv
the Lombard rebels. A body of Franciscans under his orders
worked through the country spreading the news that the
Emperor was dead. The Sicilians did not know what to do,
and in a short time a large part of continental Sicily was in his
hands. People now began to believe what Frederick had said,
that the Pope was using Crusade money to pay his soldiers, and
indeed the Pope's vindictiveness against a Crusader was in
credible. The Pope who must not carry out a death sentence
was now maintaining a papal army and leading it to battle
against a Christian prince, and a Crusader to boot, who was
absent in the Holy Land fighting for the true religion, and
whose land and property ought, according to time-honoured
convention, to be held sacred under the protection of the
Church. This brought the Pope into such bad odour that no
one can have believed his final justifications — in which there
was nevertheless a certain truth — " This war is necessary for the
Christian faith that such a mighty Persecutor of the Church
may be driven from his throne." Gregory saw the dire neces
sity. What the world saw was the reverse.
The Emperor's resolution to leave the West was an incom
parably daring gamble in which his all was at stake. When he
sailed Lombardy was already lost. He knew the Pope's in
tention to release his Sicilian subjects from their allegiance and
resume the papal fief. He knew that the next step would be
to dethrone him. He was sufficiently experienced to have no
illusions. His whole western power was in the balance, and
if defeat awaited him in the East — a visible judgment of God
against the " hubris " of the excommunicated man who with
his curse upon him had dared to set foot in the Holy Land —
then his thrones were lost, and with them his dreams of Roman
Empire. There was no alternative : he must at all costs suc
ceed. There was heavy work ahead, and well Frederick knew
it. But, as he said himself, he let none perceive his anxieties,
but turned the same confident and smiling face upon the world.
This crusade adventure of the excommunicated Emperor, pur
sued even into the Holy Land by the papal curse, is one of the
most stirring episodes in his eventful life. For a brief space
CYPRUS 179
Frederick II was cut off from all the confusion of the West, as
free as any young adventurer, or as the " pirate " Gregory DC
called him.
It was with a fleet of forty galleys under the chief command
of Admiral Henry of Malta that Frederick II eventually sailed
from Brindisi in June 1228. He was accompanied as usual by
the faithful Archbishop Berard of Palermo and the imperial
chamberlain Richard, a Sicilian who had never left the Em
peror's side since he journeyed with the Puer Apuliae to
Germany, and finally by Archbishop Jacob of Capua, who also
belonged to the trusted courtiers of the Emperor. Frederick's
other immediate friends, the German Grand Master, Count
Thomas of Aquino and Marshal Richard Filangieri, were await
ing his arrival in Syria. There were many Germans too in the
Emperor's suite, one of whom, Conrad of Hohenlohe, soon
entered his personal service. Amongst the Saracen retainers who
as usual accompanied him was Frederick II 's teacher of Arab
dialectic, a Sicilian Saracen. The gifted Frederick was to find
his fluency in Arabic conversation of more value than warriors
or weapons.
Pope Gregory was not wholly beside the mark when he stated
that no one knew whither the Emperor sailed, for Frederick II
was killing two birds with his one stone. Three weeks after
leaving Brindisi, and sailing mainly close to the coast past Corfu,
Cephalonia, Crete and Rhodes, the Emperor's galleys cast
anchor in Limassol, the harbour of Cyprus. The prince of the
island, Amaury of Lusignan, had at his own request done
feudal homage to the Emperor Henry VI and received the
crown at his hands, and since then Cyprus had been counted
a fief of the Roman Empire. During the years of chaos in
Germany the island had been lost to the Empire and Frederick
had long intended to reconquer it. This necessitated an inter
ruption of his journey. The Emperor looked on it as one of
his duties to reassemble under one firm hand the scattered
possessions of the Empire, but Cyprus had just now particular
importance as a base for the Syrian campaign. This large
island could easily support a thousand fighting men who could
release the Emperor's own troops for other work. We need
only mention here that Frederick without fighting, though not
i8o
IV
JOHN OF IBELIN 181
without a few adventures, achieved what he wanted. He con
cluded an agreement with John of Ibelin, the guardian of the
twelve-year-old king, a Syrian nobleman who enjoyed a great
reputation throughout the whole of the Christian East as a
lawyer and a scholar, and was renowned for his shrewdness,
eloquence and ingenuity. By this agreement the regency passed,
in accordance with German feudal law, to the Emperor, who
immediately nominated a Sicilian regent and installed Sicilian
chatelains in all the fortresses, while he appointed finance
officials to collect the revenues of the various districts. Ibelin and
the Cypriot knights were carried off to fight in the Holy Land.
Such was the result of the halt in Cyprus, which lasted many
weeks. Individual events on the island belong to the epic story
of knightly deeds which constitutes the life of Frederick II.
People loved to hear and tell how John of Ibelin, leader of the
anti-imperial party, appeared before the Emperor in mourning
for his dead brother. The Emperor immediately sent him the
most costly scarlet robes and begged him to put them on : for
his joy at welcoming the Emperor must surely triumph over
his grief for a lost brother. A day or two later a brilliant ban
quet was held at which Ibelin sat on the Emperor's right hand
while his sons served as pages. As the feast drew to a close
the castle gradually filled with sailors and armed men from the
Emperor's galleys, while Frederick in a stern tone demanded
an account of Ibelin's guardianship. Confounded, Ibelin at
first could make no reply. The Emperor wrathfully swore to
arrest him, when the celebrated jurist was inspired to one of
his famous speeches which held Frederick spellbound, as often
before Ibelin had enthralled the feudal court. The episode,
however, had alarmed Ibelin. A night or so later he took flight
secretly with his knights, who had been instant in warning him,
and were minded to avenge themselves for Frederick's auto
cratic behaviour. The Emperor heard the noise and fearing
an ambush slept the night on board his ship, and next morning
pursued the fugitive who had fled to the castle Dieu d 'Amour,
well known to be difficult to capture. The agreement closed
the adventure. Ibelin followed the Emperor to the Holy Land
and for the moment did him good service there, biding his
time for revenge.
iSz CRUSADER FACTIONS iv
The news of Frederick's speedy triumph in Cyprus must have
preceded him to Syria. On landing in Acre he was hailed with
indescribable joy, and the pilgrims greeted the Pope's accursed
as the " Saviour of Israel," mindful of the ancient, ever-living
prophecy that an Emperor would come out of the West to
fulfil the time, to unite East and West, and to free Jerusalem.
Even the clergy appeared to welcome him ; though they refused
the kiss of homage, the Templars and the Knights of *St. John
knelt before the excommunicate Emperor. The Muslims be
lieved that the mighty Emperor of the West, the " King of the
Amirs," had come with uncounted hosts, and they were afraid.
They soon found out that the fear was groundless. Frederick
had assembled in Acre at most ten thousand pilgrims and some
thousand knights, and he could not wholly trust even this
exiguous force. A few days after his arrival two Franciscan
emissaries of the Pope made their appearance, commanding
that none should render obedience to the banned Emperor.
Thus the quarrel between Pope and Emperor was carried even
into the Holy Land, where Frederick's fulfilment of his vow
might have been expected to effect his release from the ban.
The Emperor's position as leader of Christendom was under
mined, and the pilgrims split into two hostile camps. The
Sicilians, the Germans with the Order of Teutonic Knights,
the Pisans and Genoese remained faithful to the Emperor, but
all the rest, the English and French with the Templars and
the Knights of St. John, and above all the clergy, concentrated
on one purpose : to hinder the Emperor in every way and to
nullify his every action. For the sake of the cause Frederick
exercised the greatest self-restraint and sought to obviate all
grounds of discord. He went so far as to hand over the nominal
leadership to the Grand Master, Hermann of Salza, Marshal
Richard Filangieri and the Syrian Constable, Odo of Mont-
beliard, so that no one should need to obey an excommunicated
leader. He even acquiesced in the Templars* demand that
orders should no longer be issued over the imperial name but
in the name of God and of Christendom. All moderation on
the Emperor's part was fruitless as long as the Pope and his
Legate, Gerold, Patriarch of Jerusalem, hounded his enemies
on. Their hostile propaganda strengthened from day to day.
MUSLIM SITUATION 183
The situation was aggravated by the news that Pope Gregory
had released the Emperor's subjects from their allegiance.
Under such unhappy auspices Frederick began his difficult
enterprise in the East. Circumstances forbade warlike action
against the Saracens, even if that had formed, as it did not, part
of Frederick's plan.
A short while before, the position in the East had been phe-
nominally favourable for Frederick II. The Muslim princes
were at strife with each other and the Emperor had hoped to
take advantage of their rivalries. He had been carrying on
negotiations for a long time back with al Kamil, the Sultan of
Egypt. Al Kamil was a nephew of the chivalrous Saladin, the
first of the Ayyubids whose immense Empire was divided up
at his death ; he conceived himself threatened by his brother
al Muazzam, Sultan of Damascus, and sought to win allies
against him. The Sultan of Egypt therefore, as soon as he
heard of the Emperor's projected Crusade into Syria — which
would necessarily make Frederick a enemy of the Sultan of
Damascus — immediately sent ambassadors to Sicily to invite
an alliance, promising to give up to Frederick the whole of the
Kingdom of Jerusalem, which they would conquer together,
and begging only the Emperor's speedy arrival. Further em
bassies were interchanged, led on Frederick's side by Arch
bishop Berard of Palermo, and on the Sultan's by the Amir
Fakhru'd Din ; presents were exchanged, one of the gifts to
Frederick being an elephant, and negotiations had reached a
fairly advanced stage when Frederick reached Acre — much
later than originally intended — and at once announced his
arrival to the Sultan through his Syrian regent Count Thomas
of Aquino.
The story later ran that the Sultan had spread the streets
with carpets to welcome Frederick II : even in a metaphorical
sense this is far from true. Al Kamil was lying at Nablus with
a great army. He received the Emperor's envoys with the
greatest honour, held a review, and sent Fakhru'd Din on his
behalf to the Emperor with costly gifts, fabrics and gems, riding
camels and mules. All talk of handing over Jerusalem, how-
184 PAPAL INTRIGUES iv
ever, suddenly ceased ; the general situation had greatly altered
to Frederick's disadvantage. The feared al Muazzam, the
Sultan of Damascus, their common foe, was dead, and his little
son could scarcely rank as a serious enemy. So al Kamil, who
had also concluded an alliance with the Sultan of Mesopotamia,
had conquered a large part of the Damascus territory, including
Jerusalem, without Frederick's help. His western ally, whom
he had so urgently summoned and to whom he had promised
so much, was for the moment an encumbrance, for the Emperor
would want land which the Egyptian Sultan had just conquered
on his own behalf. Al Kamil, therefore, had recourse to the
time-honoured Oriental device of exercising lavish politeness,
inexhaustible courtesy, the liveliest assurances of friendship,
and maintaining the silence of the grave on the point at issue.
The Sultan, moreover, was aware of the weakness of Frederick's
actual forces, the quarrel in the Christian camp, and the breach
between Emperor and Pope. So before long he completely
" forgot " the Emperor's existence and quietly overlooked the
notary, his new messenger.
The Emperor's position was desperate. He must have suc
cess, and everything was conspiring against him. He could not
dream of attacking al Kamil's mighty army ; the pilgrims and
the troops whom he had marched, by way of demonstration, a
little nearer to Nablus as far as Jaffa, were on the point of star
vation, for storms had detained their supply-ships ; the nego
tiations on which he had built so much had fallen through ;
sensational news was arriving from Italy about the Pope's
activities, and — worst of all — the disaffection in his own camp
was on the increase. Intercepted letters proved that the Pope
was conjuring the Sultan on no account to hand over Jerusalem
to the Emperor. The Pope stooped to this because the success
of the banned Emperor would mean the Judgment of God
against himself . That his contemporaries were ready to believe
in the Pope's treachery is shown both by spurious letters of the
time and by the Crusade sagas which grew up round the events
of the day. Later versions even relate the capture of Frederick,
and tell how the Pope had a " counterfeit " of Frederick made,
and sent the portrait to the Sultan so that he might make no
mistake about the person of his victim.
FAKHRU'D DIN 185
Meanwhile Frederick had not gained a foot, and his presence
was urgently needed in Sicily while he bootlessly wasted valu
able time. It is not hard to believe his own later account that
at times he wept with rage and grief and thought of turning
back, but " I began to treat of peace and of agreements and
hastened preparations for my return, concealing my consuming
pain behind a cheerful countenance so that the enemy might
not triumph and rejoice." It is true that in these cheerless
days negotiations were resumed by help from the enemy him
self. The Sultan's ambassador, the Amir Fakhru'd Din, was
attached to Frederick by profound admiration and personal
friendship. He gave the Emperor a hint that something might
be accomplished by changing his envoy — the present one being
none too acceptable to the Sultan. So Count Thomas of
Aquino was sent once more to the Sultan in place of the notary
while Frederick treated with Fakhru'd Din, which all goes to
indicate how important the personal factor was throughout.
The Emperor was a past master in the art of discussion. The
charm of his personality, his astounding knowledge, his quick
ness of repartee made him the equal of any, though at times his
passionate pride and his biting wit led him into danger. In
this case, however, where he was not upholding claims but
seeking favours, this danger was absent, and it may well be
that, after all the dissensions of his own camp, the conversations
with the cultured and courteous Fakhru'd Din were restful and
refreshing. Frederick had complete command of Arabic, and
was acquainted with the Arab poets ; his amazing knowledge
of philosophy, logic, mathematics and medicine, and every
other branch of learning enabled him to turn any conversation
into the philosophical channels dear to the Oriental heart. He
had been completely successful in his handling of his Saracen
colonists of Lucera, and now he moved amongst the Saracen
princes with the perfect savour fair e of an accomplished man of
the world. So he conversed away with Fakhru'd Din about
philosophy and the arts of government, and Fakhru'd Din must
have had much to tell his master about the Emperor.
Al Kamil was the very man to appreciate such qualities. He
was an oriental edition of the Emperor, unless indeed it be more
correct to call the Emperor an occidental edition of the Sultan.
!86 PERSONAL DIPLOMACY iv
Al Kamil loved to dispute with learned men about jurisprudence
and grammar, beloved especially of the Arab ; he was himself
a poet — some of his verses still survive — and in his mountain
castle, as they tell, " fifty scholars reclined on divans round his
throne to provide his evening conversation." He spent money
willingly in the furtherance of learning ; founded a school in
Cairo for the study of Islamic Tradition, and appointed salaries
for jurists. People praised his courteous bearing as much as
his stern and impressive dignity. In addition he was an ad
mirable administrator, who checked his own revenues and even
invented new varieties of tax. He had no more fancy than
Frederick for aimless bloodshed if the end could be reached by
friendly means, and so it came about that their negotiations
presently bore fruit.
The little that we know suffices to make it clear that Frederick
set himself to win the personal friendship of the Muslims. He
had not come to seek conquests, but peaceably to take over the
districts that had previously been offered him. " I should not
have sought to win such terms from the Sultan had I not been
fearful of losing my prestige amongst the Franks," he said quite
frankly at the close, and probably the same tone had prevailed
throughout. While the negotiations were in progress not a
whisper of their political significance was audible outside.
People have sorely reproached the Emperor for this secretive-
ness, which, however, was imposed on him by the papal intrigues
and the dissensions in the Christian camp. It was revolting to
Gregory's supporters that the Emperor should treat at all with
unbelievers. Even the Swabian poet, the " Freidank," an
admirer of the Hohenstaufen, himself a Crusader, thought it
high time there should be " an end of whisperings," whose
worth, in the absence of" high counsel," he gravely questioned.
Neither the papal nor the German party could tolerate this
autocratic method of imperial negotiations, centring round
the person of the Emperor alone, divorced from the advice of the
great. Yet this method suited al Kamil as well as it suited the
Emperor. We know that he was wont to conduct the affairs
of state singlehanded, without reference to his Wazir ; indeed,
on the death of his Wazir he omitted to appoint a successor and
contented himself with the services of a scribe. Frederick was
1229 TREATY WITH MUSLIMS 187
shrewd enough to perceive how much might be achieved by
mutual personal friendship and courtesy, that was unattainable
by public discussion. A certain degree of give and take was
possible in secret — and it was now a question of giving on both
sides. The treaty which Frederick concluded on the i8th of
February, 1229, is most obviously coloured by the personal
desire to please on al KarmTs side. The Christians, however,
felt it to be rather a weak point that there were no guarantees
on either side save the personal good faith of Emperor and
Sultan. According to this agreement Frederick was to receive
back Jerusalem with the exception of the Haramu'sh Sharif, the
sacred enclosure in which the mosque of 'Urnar and the rock
temple of Solomon were situate. The Christian pilgrims, how
ever, were permitted to perform their prayers in this area, and
the Muslims conversely theirs in Bethlehem, which was ceded
to Frederick. The Emperor also acquired Nazareth and a strip
of land running from Jerusalem to the coast, further Sidon and
Caesarea, Jaffa and Acre, and some other places. All these
might be fortified by the Christians, and, though the kingdom
of Jerusalem was not to be militarised, a ten-year truce was
concluded which Frederick hoped to renew with his friend al
Kamil on its expiry.
The treaty was not without its weak points, but the papalists'
attacks on it as a " patchwork " were unjust. Frederick II,
the banned Emperor, had done what no other Emperor had
succeeded in doing, what all Crusaders had failed to do since
Saladin conquered Jerusalem — he had set free the Holy City.
When Frederick assembled the German pilgrims and announced
the news they broke out into shouts of uncontrolled rejoicing.
On the advice of Hermann of Salza the Emperor decided him
self to enter the liberated Jerusalem at the head of the pilgrims.
The joy of his adherents was equalled only by the rage of his
enemies. The Emperor's success was for the Pope the most
unwelcome thing that could have happened. The Patriarch,
unsuccessfully, forbade the pilgrims to enter Jerusalem with the
Emperor. He was infuriated by Frederick's omission to consult
him, and also by the rejoicing of the Germans, and wrote to the
i88 MU&LIMS AND JERUSALEM iv
Pope : " The Germans had only one thought, to be free to visit
the Holy Sepulchre ; they were the only nation who raised
paeans of praise and illuminated the town in festal wise ; all
others considered the whole thing a folly."
Gerold's hatred of the Emperor finally exceeded all bounds.
He informed the Pope at great length about the treaty, empha
sising pharisaically its weak points — many of which were
primarily attributable to his own multiple treachery — and
painted the Emperor as a fool who had allowed himself to be
hoodwinked by the Mussulmans. He was more particularly
embittered because the treaty contained not a word about the
restoration of Church and Monastery property. The Pope lost
no time in further blackening this report and circulating it to
the world, maliciously representing Frederick's conduct as dis
graceful in treating at all with the Infidel and permitting the
Heathen to worship in Jerusalem. He was skilful in glossing
over the fact that Frederick had after all accomplished more
than all the mighty Crusaders of recent times.
The loss of Jerusalem made so unhappy an impression on
the Musulmans that it is quite clear that al Kamil had gone to
the utmost limit of the possible. Saladin had written once to
Cceur de Lion : " Jerusalem is to us as holy as to you, nay,
more holy, for thence the Prophet made by night his flight to
Heaven, and there the angels are wont to assemble." The
Khalif of Baghdad called him to account, the other Sultans were
wroth with him, and mourning for the loss of the Holy City,
which was felt to be a most bitter blow to Islam, rose to open
demonstrations against al Kamil. Finally, a service of protest
was held, which the Sultan punished only by the confiscation
of the treasures of the mosque — an expedient which probably
impressed Frederick. The Muslims, however, conceded that
al Kamil, who had himself called the Emperor to his help,
had been in a dilemma, and they comforted themselves with
thoughts of the future and of the Will of Allah. The Sultan's
advantage in this pact was slight, and consisted mainly in having
secured for himself the opportunity of pursuing his campaigns
of conquest undisturbed by a new Crusade, which would cer
tainly have followed his refusal to surrender Jerusalem. Al
KamiPs relations with Kaiser Frederick grew more and more
SARACEN CHIVALRY 189
cordial, though partisans on both sides bitterly resented this
friendship with one of an alien faith.
Frederick II owed his great success unquestionably to the
Amir Fakhru'd Din, and tradition has it that the Emperor
knighted him and gave him permission to wear the imperial
eagle on his shield. There is nothing improbable in this ;
similar tales are told of Coeur de Lion. For the world of
East and West was then one great knightly comradeship, in
which there reigned so much common chivalry that the barriers
of religion were not insuperable. The aristocratic standards of
chivalry were indeed earlier developed in the East, in Persia,
than in Europe, as the epic of Firdausi and many another poem
reveals to us. Both in East and West this feeling for knightly
comradeship was a living thing, and the epic of the West always
represents the Saracen knights as conspicuously noble and
distinguished : think only of Feirefiss,1 Parzival's black-and-
white brother, of Ortnit's helper, of the wise heathen Zacharias,
of Ariosto's Medor, and, above all, of Saladin, the pearl of
oriental chivalry, to whom Dante accorded a place in Elysium,
beside the great pagan heroes and poets, though it was he who
had taken Jerusalem from the Christians.
The Emperor had still something to learn of Saracen chivalry.
He was anxious to visit the place of Christ's baptism on the
Jordan and set out from Jerusalem with a few followers. The
Templars, who had allowed themselves to become the blind
tools of the Patriarch, sent news of this expedition, apparently
at the direct instigation of the Pope, to the Sultan al Kamil :
here was his chance to take Frederick prisoner, and if he wished
to make away with him. " Disgusted by this low treachery,"
and not sorry to put to shame the Pope's Christian knights,
al Kamil sent the letter with a covering note to the Emperor,
who from that time forward cherished an undying hatred of
the Templars. He was grateful for the Sultan's friendship,
which he cherished till al Kamil's death and then transferred
to his son.
1 Feirefis, Old French : vaire fiz, " the particoloured son," Wolfram von
Eschenbach, i. 1705. — Tr.
igo RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE iv
The Arabs on their side preserved kindly memories of the
Emperor. Partly from motives of expediency and partly from
genuine inclination Frederick II liked to make himself one of
the Saracens. He had a great admiration for their science, and
he purposely paraded also his unfeigned respect for their re
ligion and their customs . The Muslims related many anecdotes
of the Emperor in this regard, which tally well with utter
ances of Frederick's. The Emperor, for instance, attended the
Mosque of 'Urnar with one of the Sultan's amirs. As he came
forth he saw a Christian priest standing at the door of the
sanctuary with the gospel in his hand begging from the pilgrims,
and even from the Emperor himself. Enraged at this breach
of the Saracen's hospitality Frederick smote him on the chest
and knocked him down, shouting " Thou viper . . ., we are
naught but the slaves of the Sultan who allows us so many
privileges, and thou darest to transgress the bounds that he has
set ! The next of you who so offends I shall most surely slay."
The Emperor's violence when roused was well known, and
many anecdotes of it are told.
In Jerusalem Frederick lodged in the house of the Qazi
Shamsu'd Din. The Sultan had expressly given orders out of
courtesy to his friend, whose religious feelings he did not wish
to offend, that the muazzins must not chant the call to prayer
during the Emperor's stay. One of them forgot, and at the time
for morning prayer mounted the minaret and sang out the
verses, expressly directed against the Christian faith, " He be-
getteth not, neither is he begotten, and there is none like unto
him," and so forth. The Qazi reproved him and the next
night he refrained. In the morning, however, the Emperor
summoned the Qazi and asked him why the muazzin had not
chanted the call to prayer. The Qazi quoted the Sultan's
orders. " O Qazi " — Frederick is said to have replied — " you
are doing wrong to alter your cult, your customs, your religion
for my sake. You would not need to do so even if you were
in my country." This was quite true. An Arabic scholar, who
in later years visited King Manfred, was not a little surprised
to hear the muazzins calling the faithful to prayer from the
minarets of Lucera. The story about different religions and
the three rings was told in relation to Frederick. The Arabs
A POLITICAL CRUSADE 191
learnt on another occasion that the Emperor refused to be
hedged within conventional boundaries and had an opinion of
his own about religion, differing in many points from that
current in his day. On the cupola of the Sakhrah mosque in
Jerusalem Frederick read the golden inscription of the con
queror Saladin : " Saladin cleansed this temple of the poly-
theists." The Emperor pretended not to understand, and for
the pleasure of seeing the Muslims' embarrassment insisted on
their explaining to him who the polytheists could be. They
told him that the Christians with their Trinity were meant.
He then went on to ask " What is the point of the grill over the
doors of the mosque ? " " To keep out the sparrows " ; where
upon the Emperor — using the Arabic term of contempt for
Christians as " unclean " — smiled and said, "Yet Allah has
brought the swine amongst you after all/*
With phrases like these Frederick II shocked even the
Saracens themselves ; they thought he could scarcely be even
a Christian, bat must be some materialist who denied the im
mortality of the soul. They had no great opinion of his looks
— he was beardless and of medium height — " If he were a slave/'
they said, " he would not be worth two hundred drachmas " ;
but his dignified bearing and his bonhomie were appreciated.
The Muslims were amazed when at the time of midday prayer
almost all the Emperor's servants and one of his teachers stood
up and went through the orthodox Muhammadan ritual as true
believers : they were the Sicilian Saracens of the Emperor's
household.
So Frederick did not even maintain the pretence of a war for
the faith : his Crusade was purely an affair of state, a matter
concerning the Empire, not the Church, and this could not have
been made clearer than by the existence of his Muslim retinue.
It was perfectly natural for Frederick, from the political point
of view, to pose as an Oriental here in Syria. Napoleon in
Egypt was prepared to go considerable lengths and loved to be
called Sultan al Kabir. Making due allowance for the difference
of centuries great men on the human side are much alike. Each
of these wanted in the East to be an Oriental. The same im
pulse made Frederick occasionally use pure oriental formulas.
In concluding the Treaty he swore, for instance, " to eat the
192 ORIENTAL LEARNING iv
flesh of his left hand " if he should break the agreement. Once,
when negotiations had come to a standstill, the Emperor ad
vanced towards Jaffa, sending — in the symbolism of the Orient
— his imperial weapons, armour and helmet, to the Sultan to
indicate that he still had these resources behind him.
The Orient had different connotations for these two great
men. Unstinted admiration of the Arab mind was the weigh
tiest factor with the Hohenstaufen Emperor. For Frederick II
lived in a day when the East was the source of all European
knowledge and science, as Italy and Roman culture were to the
barbarian North, as of old the art and philosophy of Hellas
were to Italy. The spirit of the medieval Church was im
prisoned in formula and dogma, the fetters could be loosened
only by oriental hellenistic knowledge, chiefly knowledge of the
laws of Nature. Frederick was more determined than any
contemporary to unlock these stores of knowledge, and he was
destined to be, in virtue of his mental receptiveness and his
Sicilian birth, the great intermediary and reconciler of East and
West. He may be seen in philosophic discourse with Fakhru'd
Din, exchanging geometric and algebraic questions with al
Kamil, mixing with the most celebrated Arab astronomers
whom he had begged the Sultan to lend him. Architecture
again claimed his attention, as so often. He studied the octa
gonal Mosque of 'Umar in Jerusalem, with the cupola of green
and gold and the artistic pulpit, which he mounted with
admiration. He even collected information for his hunting.
" When we were in the Orient we observed that the Arabs
themselves use a hood in hawking, for the Arab kings sent us
their most skilful falconers with falcons of every kind."
It is self-evident that affairs of state naturally challenged his
most serious attention ; a conversational fragment is instructive.
He was discussing the Khalifate with Fakhru'd Din. The
Amir explained to the Emperor how the Khalifate of the
Abbasids could be traced back in unbroken line to al Abbas,
the uncle of the Prophet, and thus still remained in the family
of the Founder. " That is excellent/' said Frederick, " far
superior to the arrangement of those fools, the Christians.
They choose as their spiritual head any fellow they will, without
the smallest relationship to the Messiah, and they make him
THE "ASSASSINS" 193
the Messiah's representative. That Pope there has no claim
to such a position, whereas your Khalif is the descendant of
Muhammad's uncle." Here speaks the pride of race of one
who later loved to style himself " son and grandson of Emperors
and Kings " — in contrast to the Pope — and here we see too his
reverence for natural above spiritual law, for Frederick was
fully emancipated from the excessive mysticism of his time.
These things all gave a pretext for the papal reproach that
Frederick II had adopted Saracen customs. Legend, partly
friendly, partly malicious, strengthened this belief. The
Saracen dancing girls, whom the Sultan had sent for his enter
tainment became, in the Pope's letters, Christian women whom
Frederick had compelled to dance before the Infidel before
being outraged. An English pilgrim even wrote home that the
Emperor had married the Sultan's daughter and fifty Saracen
women. His marriage with Isabella of Jerusalem may have
lent colour to this story, perhaps also the fact that he had a
natural son, Frederick of Antioch, of whose mother nothing
was known and whose name suggested an oriental origin.
People later even explained the normal dress of the Muslim
women, the black " chadar," as mourning for Frederick which
the women had worn ever since his departure.
It is obvious that Frederick's stay in the Holy Land kindled
the imagination of his contemporaries in the very highest degree,
especially his relationship to the Assassins (Hashishin), with
one branch of whom, the Ismailites of Lebanon, he did in
fact exchange embassies. The Hashishin were, as Marco Polo
recorded a generation kter, a fanatical sect who were trained
to the most unquestioning obedience by their leader, Hasan i
Sabbah, the so-called " Old Man of the Mountain," and com
mitted every kind of murder for the service of Islam. Suitable
boys were selected and for years subjected to a most spartan
regime, the delights of Paradise recounted to them the while.
When the right moment came they were given a draught of
hashish with their usual frugal meal. When they awoke it was
to find themselves in a veritable garden of Paradise, which the
" Old Man of the Mountain " had contrived in a beautiful
194 LEGENDS ABOUT FREDERICK iv
valley. Here all the realistic promises of the Qur'an were
fulfilled, streams flowed with honey, milk and wine, there were
leaping fountains, huris and boys. After a few days of glorious
enjoyment the disciples were given a second draught, from
which they woke to find themselves again at the Old Man's
table, filled with yearning for the Paradise they had tasted.
They were promised a return to Paradise if they should find
death in their master's service. The one ambition of the
Hashishin was, therefore, speedy death.
The Emperor had had intercourse — though very transitory —
with this terrible sect whose daggers had laid low innumerable
distinguished crusaders, and people told tales of a visit he was
alleged to have paid to the " Old Man of the Mountain." To
demonstrate the obedience of his people the Old Man had
signalled to two who were standing at the top of a high tower ;
happy to attain Paradise so soon, they hurled themselves down
at his bidding. A later version represents Frederick as rearing
his own " obedient stabbers " on similar lines. He locked
children in a cellar, it was said, showed himself very rarely, and
had them taught that the Emperor was God Almighty. When
the little prisoners learned this :
They thought that this indeed was so,
The Kaiser was Lord God below.
No prince was murdered during Frederick's lifetime whose
death was not ascribed to Frederick's assassins, and even the
Popes did not scorn to spread such rumours.
These tales, of course, lack all historic truth, but it is interest
ing to note how tales of horror and wonder tend to focus round
one great name, partly in order to gain greater credence from
its authority and partly out of a strange desire to see two incon
gruous elements brought together in one person's story — the
real and the fantastic ; Muhammad and Christ ; Kaiser and
Khali f. The oriental atmosphere that surrounds the figure of
Frederick II was a necessary factor in the evolution of the auto
cratic mind, which loved to exercise the unchallenged caprice
of a master. The Puer Apuliae has developed and revealed
himself : he is no longer the fate and destiny of individuals ;
but as the Emperor, imitating the Old Man of the Mountain
MUSLIM FRIENDS 195
and playing God to his little prisoners in the cellar, he becomes
himself the fate or destiny of communities and peoples.
There is no doubt that the Emperor was deeply impressed
by the unquestioning obedience that he saw and by the un
limited autocracy of the oriental despot and the aura of Fate
that surrounded them. A few years later the Pope wrote
bitterly to him : " In thy kingdom of Sicily no man dares
move a hand or foot save at thy command."
In all the anecdotes and reported conversations that record
Frederick's words and deeds during his Syrian stay, one recur
ring note is the immense admiration and reverence that he
displayed for men and things. No doubt this had a political
value — but the same is true throughout his life. When
Frederick, in later days, was showing distinguished visitors his
priceless planetarium, in which sun, moon and stars moved in
mysterious harmony, he loved to tell that this was a gift of his
Arab friend the Sultan, who was dearer to him than any living
man save only King Conrad, his son and the heir of his body.
Such a phrase indicates how boundless was the admiration felt
by this greater Emperor for the Muslim princes — himself almost
sole arbiter of the West. Constantly tie proud boast recurs :
" The Hohenstaufen Emperor, friend of the Muslim King " ;
when, for instance, he begs on occasion the loan of a small force
from the Sultan of Egypt to intimidate the Lombard rebels, or
when he opines that certain events in the East would not have
taken place if he had had his way, sighing : " Ah ... if my
friend al Kamil were alive . . . ! " Or, at a Diet of the German
princes in Friuli, when the Emperor received with ostenta
tious favour a deputation from his Arab friends and celebrated
with them — in sight of bishops and princes — in a great
banquet the Muhammadan feast of the Hijrah, and then de
parted for Apulia in company with his Muslim guests ; or
when for a long time he mourns and bitterly laments the death
of his friend, al Kamil — whom he had scarcely ever met — the
chronicler who reports this imperial grief suggests a remarkable
cause : the Sultan had perished unbaptised. All indications
point to the fact that for the only time in his life, now vis-d-vi$
196 ARAB ADMIRATION xv
the East, Kaiser Frederick felt himself to be the learner and
the gainer. He is ever ready to acknowledge the debt and
proclaim himself the disciple ; or, to use his own strong ex
pression, " We are all naught but slaves of the Sultan." That
sums up the situation. On every convenient occasion Frederick
endeavours to imitate his Eastern models, to pose as one of
themselves. He sends mathematical and philosophical ques
tions to the Sultans, or begs the Khalif for his good offices to
convey an imperial letter on such topics to one scholar or
another. After his return to the West Frederick kept up his
Eastern correspondence, and recounts to his Muslim friends
his quarrels with the Pope and with the Lombards, quoting by
the way the famous Arab poets and imitating Arab custom in
the endless titles he gives himself : Frederick, son of Kaiser
Henry, son of Kaiser Frederick, etc., etc. He does not omit
the customary emulation in the giving of gifts : al Kamil had
presented him with an elephant, Frederick sends him in return
a polar bear, which to the amazement of the Arabs eats nothing
but fish. It is easy to detect the Emperor's pride in being thus
able to return the Sultan's costly gift. In his intercourse with
Easterns Frederick displays the gratitude which the Pope used
to demand from him in vain. Only from the East did Frederick
in fact receive new ideas and intellectual stimulus.
The Emperor was naturally not indifferent to the impression
he created ; he succeeded in exciting great admiration : no
western prince has ever evoked so much affection and under
standing as he. Not only did they admire the encyclopaedic
learning of the Emperor, who maintained erudite correspon
dence with the learned men of Egypt and Syria, Iraq, Arabia,
Yemen, as well as Morocco and Spain, but they followed
all the more important events of his life with unflagging
interest. They knew of his Lombard troubles, of the con
spiracies engineered by the Pope, spoke familiarly of Tuscany
and Lombardy , quoted admiringly the interminable titles of the
Emperor in which all his kingdoms and provinces were re
hearsed by name. " I wished to include this letter (with the
titles)," writes an Arab historian, " to record what territories
are united under the sceptre of this Emperor and King. In
truth there has never been in Christendom since the days of
MARCH 1229 ENTRY INTO JERUSALEM 197
Alexander a monarch like to this, not only because of his power
but because he challenges the Pope to battle, their Khalif, and
drives him from the field." A hundred years later people still
quoted Frederick on the political constellations of Italy : who
ever wished to rule in Italy — he had said — must be good friends
with the Pope, must have Milan in his power, and must possess
good astrologers.
It was a highly intellectual " Marriage Festival of Susa " that
Frederick celebrated when he surrendered to the East as all
great men have done since Alexander of Macedon, each after
his own kind. What intoxicated the Hohenstaufen was not the
space nor the sensual magic, which had been familiar to him as
a Sicilian from his boyhood, but the inspiring freedom of the
spirit, unfettered by scholastic philosophy and church dogma.
He was the first and only medieval Emperor who drank of the
spirit of the East and came home to fuse it with the Holy Roman
Empire, the Empire of the Salians and the Hohenstaufens.
It was the Eastern triumph, not merely Eastern travel that
won for Frederick the halo of the Caesars. On the iyth of
March, 1229, the Emperor Frederick II made his entry into the
royal city of Jerusalem. In defiance of Patriarch Gerold's
commands, the bulk of the pilgrims followed him, impelled
partly by the yearning to do reverence to the Holy Sepulchre,
partly by the desire to witness how the age-old prophecy would
be fulfilled, of the Messianic ruler of the West who should set
free Jerusalem. More than ten years before a widespread Arab
prophecy had named the Calabrian King as Saviour of the
Tomb, and many thought that King of the East was drawing
nigh who should attack Islam in the rear. It was true enough
that the Muslims had a hard fight to fight in the further East,
but no man knew in all its fulness what this meant. For the
distant thunder was the trampling of Chingiz Khan's mounted
hordes, while the Christians were still thinking of the Nestorian
Prester John, whom men compared to Alexander, and with
whom the Emperor was supposed to have exchanged remark
able embassies. There was no doubt at all in the minds of
" the Pious," as Frederick now began for the first time to style
198 POPE IRRECONCILABLE iv
his adherents, that the Hohenstaufen Frederick II whom the
pilgrims followed was the true Emperor of the Fulfilment who
as by a miracle had succeeded in freeing Jerusalem, " without
battle, without instrument of war, without bloodshed/* as the
promise ran. To the papalists the Emperor now appeared to
assume the features of the impious Anti-Christ who should
take his seat like a God in the temple of the Almighty for the
confusion of the faithful.
On the day of his entry Frederick immediately betook himself
to the Church of the Sepulchre, " In order," as he wrote, "as
a Catholic Emperor, to worship reverently at the grave of our
Lord." The whole world assumed that since the Emperor had
now not only fulfilled his vow to make a Crusade, but had also
accomplished the liberation of Jerusalem, he would be forth
with released from the papal ban. ... " For no ban can endure
longer in the eyes of God than a man's sin," so " Freidank "
declared, in almost heretic phrase, challenging thereby the papal
claim " to bind and to loose." Even more anti-papal was his
next clause : " Obedience is good as long as the Master worketh
righteousness. If the Master seek to compel the servant to do
what is wrong before God, then the servant must quit his
master and follow him who doeth right." Many another pil
grim shared Freidank's views, and in Germany the Pope was
often styled a " heretic." The Emperor, too, was hopeful that
his excommunication would now be ended. He wanted to
arrange for a Sunday Mass in the Church of the Sepulchre.
The wise and prudent Hermann of Salza, however, dissuaded
him from thus rashly forestalling the Pope and challenging his
further displeasure, for all the attempts at reconciliation that
Frederick had made before and after his arrival in the Holy
Land had been ignored, or had only provoked a renewal of the
ban. The Pope's unforgiving spirit was turned to good account.
Thanks to it, it came about that on the i8th of March, the
fourth Sunday before Easter, there took place in Jerusalem in
the Church of the Holy Sepulchre the most memorable self-
coronation of an Emperor that the world was to see till the days
of Napoleon. In full imperial State the banned and excom
municated Emperor — outside the congregation of the faithful —
accompanied by followers and friends, crossed the threshold of
SELF-CORONATION 199
the sacred edifice. Here, where the first king of Jerusalem,
Godfrey of Bouillon, with humble emotion, refused to wear a
golden circlet where his Lord had worn a crown of thorns ;
here, without intermediary of the Church, without bishop,
without coronation mass, Kaiser Frederick II, proud and
unabashed, stretched forth his hand to take the royal crown
of the Holy City. Striding towards the altar of the Sepulchre
he lifted from it the crown, and himself placed it on his own
head — an act, whether so intended, of far-reaching symbolism.
For thus, on the holiest spot of all the Christian universe, he
asserted a king's immediate vassalhood to God, and without the
interposition of the Church approached his God direct as a
triumphant conqueror.
Frederick II made no effort to derive from doctrines and
theories a belief in the immediate relationship of God to
Emperor — a doctrine fiercely denied by the Popes since the
evolution of the Hierarchy — he based it on the miracles of his
own career, obvious to all and far-renowned, which proved as
nothing else could do that God's immediate choice rested on
his imperial person, if not on his imperial office. This personal
element could be reinforced by doctrine, such as the teaching
of a certain supernatural character inherent in the imperial
majesty. Before the great breach Pope Gregory had written
that God had installed the Emperor as a Cherub ; he had been
elevated " not as a Seraph but as a second Cherub, as a token
of resemblance to the only-begotten son," so they wrote later.
This angelic character, which Pope Innocent had claimed for
himself — " less than God, but more than man " — was alluded
to by Frederick in the words wherewith he announced the im
perial triumph in Jerusalem to the world at large. Immediately
after the coronation Frederick made a public speech to the
assembled pilgrims, while Hermann of Salza repeated the
Emperor's words in Latin and in German. The same speech,
greatly expanded and enriched, formed the basis of a manifesto
which was to announce the glory of this day to all the world :
magniloquent pathos in which the Emperor's more than mortal
voice should make itself heard throughout the entire orbis
terrantm. " Let all that are of righteous heart rejoice and
give thanks unto the Lord, who hath taken pleasure in his
200 JERUSALEM MANIFESTO iv
people as they praised the Emperor of Peace. Let us praise him,
whom the angels praise. . . ." The very first phrases place
Frederick in the due proximity to God amongst the angels, like
them aloft above the people, and now through the Emperor's
rnouth is heard the very voice of God himself making known
to the peoples the deeds of the Emperor as his own: "God
he is the Lord, and it is he alone who worketh great wonders,
it is he who mindful of his own mercy renews in our day the
marvels that he wrought of old, as it is written. For God when
he would make known his might hath need neither of chariots
nor of horses : he hath shewn his power by the small number
of his instruments, that all peoples might see and know that he
is terrible in his might and glorious in his majesty and mar
vellous in his planning beyond all the sons of men. For in these
few last days, more by the power of his wonders than by men's
courage, he hath happily caused that work to be accomplished
which for long times past many princes and many mighty of the
earth with the multitude of their peoples have all essayed in
vain."
Thus Frederick ascribes to God what he himself had done,
and while the Emperor praises the triumph of the One God he
skilfully (with God) praises himself. Then, after an appeal to
the nation, he bursts out: "See ye, now is the day of that
salvation . . .", and the manifesto proceeds to recount the won
derful proofs of God's counsel and help displayed from the
beginning. The pitiable plight of the pilgrims in Jaffa is
pictured when suddenly the storms have cut off all supplies and
when thereupon fear and murmuring waxed strong amongst
them. God commanded the winds and the sea and a great
calm fell, and all men cried " How great is he that commandeth
the winds and the waters and they obey him." The Emperor
then related other difficulties, all of which God and his Son
had miraculously solved by the instrumentality of the Emperor.
How the hostile Sultans had lain at the distance of but one day's
journey, and how Christ himself, having witnessed from on high
the Emperor's patience and long suffering, so directed the nego
tiations that the Holy City was yielded to the Emperor and the
treaty was ready for confirmation on the very day of our Lord's
resurrection. Finally, the scene in Jerusalem was briefly painted
KING OF JERUSALEM 201
when the excommunicated Emperor donned the crown, " For
Almighty God from the throne of his majesty in the plentitude
of his grace hath exalted us above all the princes of the earth,
that all may know that the hand of the Lord hath done this.
And all who revere the True Faith shall proclaim far and wide
that 'the blessed of God hath visited us and hath wrought
salvation for his people and hath exalted a horn in the house
of his servant David.' "
Beneath the appearance of humble devotion all this ascription
of each success to God served but to exalt the Emperor himself.
This was, moreover, the first time that Frederick II had adopted
the words of Holy Scripture about the Son of God and applied
them to his own Majesty : through the God-Kingship of David
approaching the Saviour. There was nothing sensationally
new in this. All the Emperors since Charlemagne had held
themselves to be the heirs and successors of King David, the
Chosen of God, and this was an argument for the ancient claim
of the imperial immediacy. The coronation formula has this
in mind, " David thy son thou hast exalted to the summit of
Kingship." The claim, however, was one thing ; its actual
realisation was another. For Frederick II was not merely
claiming intellectually the inheritance of David, but claimed
miraculously to have entered into actual possession of his
inheritance, and showed himself to all the world as King of
Jerusalem. Men sang the praises of the Emperor, " David
wast thou in Jerusalem," and Frederick himself wrote " It fills
us with joy that our Saviour Jesus of Nazareth also sprang from
David's royal stock." Similar thoughts were in the mind of a
German poet who celebrated the Emperor's triumphs of these
days in pompous hexameters comparing Frederick to Jeru
salem's other King :
Jerusalem gaude nomen Domini venerare
Magnifica laude : vis ut dicam tibi quare ?
Rex quia magnificus Jesus olim, mine Fridericus,
Promptus uterque pati, sunt in te magnificat!.
Obtulit ille prior semet pro posteriori
Et pro posterior sua seque prioris honore. . . .
Both ICings of Jerusalem, in Christian times Christ the first,
Frederick the last, the Saviour and the Emperor, both thought
202 VOW REDEEMED iv
of together as the successors of David, as the Son of God, the
spirits like unto angels that mediate between God and man.
Godfrey and his successors on the throne of Jerusalem had
rejoiced in no such connection, but then they had not been
Roman Emperors, Rulers of the World.
" Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat," the
historic coronation cry of the Sicilian kings, dating from the
earliest days of Christianity, when still-surviving paganism
represented Christ in the figure of Apollo, was more than ever
the watchword of the triumphant world ruler. Frederick II
was fain to compare himself wielding the swords of justice and
of power with the royal and victorious Christ, the hero of the
Germanic peoples, as the old Saxon poem of the Heliand
depicted him, the warrior Lord with his battle companions.
This was Kaiser Frederick's limit. Quite expressly this Ful-
filler of the Law had been called " a token of similarity to the
Only-Begotten Son as second Cherub not a Seraph. . . ." But
the " Other " had become man once more : Francis of Assisi had
again incarnated the seraphic Christ, the Redeemer, the Sufferer.
While still a boy Frederick II had offered himself to God
after his first triumph in Aix. Fifteen years later in the prime
of life, in his thirty-fifth year, he had in Jerusalem made good
his boyish vow, and in a second triumph united himself with
God. The distant future held a third triumph in store.
Frederick's triumphs were always of the kind that opened to
him new spheres. A critical change is to be noted : in the
Puer Apuliae the Church herself, and with her Pope Innocent
III, had triumphed ; in the godlike triumph of the excom
municate Emperor in Jerusalem the Church had neither part
nor lot — through the fault of the irreconcilable High Priest.
Not one word of Frederick's manifesto alludes to the Church
triumphant ; the Victor was God, was the Saviour and through
God the Emperor. Their deeds are one and the relation of the
miracles bring thereof the clearest proof ; they display Frederick
in tune with God, much as Caesar's tale of portents on the
day of Pharsalia, showed Caesar in harmony with the Roman
Pantheon. Not through the Church, but alongside and with
out the Church, Frederick II had consummated his triumph
as it were an unio mystica. It is not irrelevant to note how
A NEW ERA 203
the Emperor's great antagonist, St. Francis, through deepest
humiliation, achieved outside the Church his union with God.
Neither the glorious triumph of the Emperor nor the un
exampled humility of St. Francis could in fact find a place within
the Church ; as Spirits, as Cherub, and as Seraph they might
serve the Church with sword and palm in her strife against
infidel and heretic, but both had outgrown the mediation of
the Church, and as immediately in touch with God they both
were driven to create : the one a following, an Order of his
own, the other a State.
The Emperor Frederick's self-coronation at the Saviour's
tomb serves as a tangible expression of this immediacy. He
already shared the atmosphere of romance and fatefulness that
surrounded the Khalifs ; he now wore the divine halo of an
eastern potentate. As the sibylline saying had foretold —
though in far other wise than the world had understood — the
rulers of East and West were united in Jerusalem in the one
person of Frederick II, and the Holy City was free. With
Frederick, the only emperor who in Jerusalem wore the crown
of Jerusalem, the epoch of a Christian Empire was ended. A
new era was dawning. Out of the East Frederick brought back
not the renewal of a Christian Empire, but the birth of Western
" Monarchy." His was the last figure round which the double
glory played : the old Christian majesty and sanctity and
the new western secular monarchy. The Prankish- Germanic
feudal kingship which sanctified blood and race, the Hohen-
staufen-Roman Empire of Barbarossa, which sanctified the
office, had been further exalted under Frederick II by the
eastern conception of despotism which worshipped the actual
wielder of power as such, the person of the ruler as the Homo
Dei, a god-man, a son of God, himself divine. This fourth and
last coronation marked the end of Frederick's personal " de
velopment," his purely individual rise to power : no further
growth was possible to him as a man, save with and through
his states. The question was whether he could awaken an echo
in some nation, whether some people could comprehend him,
as the divine power within him seemed to portend.
204 INVASION OF SICILY iv
The eastern successes began to act with steadying force on
the Emperor's tottering position in the West ; at first only in
Germany, where the papal machinations had all along carried
but little weight, while the reports of the Emperor's victories
had carried much. Duke Albert of Saxony immediately issued
the joyous manifesto to the Germans in Reval, while Count
Adolfus of Holstein dated his documents " in the year of the
reconquest of the Holy Land by Frederick the uncenquered
Roman Emperor."
In Sicily, on the other hand, the prospect was blacker than
ever. In spite of the zeal of the Lords of Aquino, and the Chief
Justice Henry of Morra and the Regent Reginald of Spoleto and
the Saracens — showing for the first time their full worth — the
kingdom was proving not nearly so invulnerable as Frederick
had hoped, particularly in the absence of its king. The im
perial forces were divided ; one detachment lay in the Abruzzi,
the other in Capua. The Pope's Soldiers of the Keys, under
the leadership of John, quondam King of Jerusalem, had suc
ceeded in invading the kingdom and reducing the majority of
the continental provinces. The Church played her favourite
role of " Liberator of the Oppressed." The yoke of Frede
rick II had been no light one ; the Pope spread rumours of
the Emperor's death, and freed Sicilian subjects from their
allegiance. These combined causes hastened the downfall of
the imperial rule in the peninsula. Nevertheless, a faithful
few retained their loyalty and looked for Frederick's return as
eagerly as the Papalists feared it. John of Brienne, the Pope's
general, had secretly given orders to watch the ports of Apulia
and take the Emperor prisoner in the moment of landing.
Suddenly in early June 1229 — in spite of all these precautions
— the rumour arose that the Emperor was in Apulia.
Before quitting the Holy Land Frederick had had some
further unpleasant experiences. In his address to the assembled
pilgrims after his coronation in Jerusalem he had been most
scrupulous, in accordance with the line he had adopted from
the first, to use only conciliatory phrases in speaking of the
Pope. Instead of raising complaints against Gregory, which
would have been easy, he took pains to find excuses for him.
It was no less in harmony with the whole conduct of the
RE-EMBARKATION AT ACRE 205
Papalist party that they redoubled their hostile activities and
intrigues as his success increased. The Pope had dubbed
Frederick a " pirate " and refused to recognise his crusadership.
The patriarch Gerold had, therefore, full assurance that none
of his perfidious schemes would rouse the disapproval which
Frederick had prophesied to the pilgrims. Thus it came about
that Frederick's eventful stay in Jerusalem lasted only two days :
he entered on a Saturday, crowned himself on Sunday, and
quitted the town on Monday. For Gerold had not only ordered
a Dominican to renew the Pope's excommunication, but had
actually laid the Holy City under an interdict — to the inde
scribable wrath of the pilgrims. They could not offer their
prayers in the holy places which the Emperor had restored to
them and felt themselves befooled by Church and Pope. The
Emperor forthwith left Jerusalem after a smart encounter with
Templars and clergy — the Templars1 plot to betray him falls
chronologically here. For the rest, his advice to the pilgrims
was to join him and embark with him from Acre.
There was nothing now to detain Frederick in the Holy Land.
Bad news from Sicily had reached Acre. He looked impatiently
forward to the return, and had ordered his admiral, Henry of
Malta, to be ready by Easter with the galleys in Acre. The
wildest and most shameful scene was to come before he left
Palestine. In spite of Frederick's veto the Patriarch had en
listed troops in the Emperor's own kingdom of Jerusalem. This
defiance of the imperial authority was the more flagrant that
the troops could only be wanted to serve against the Emperor
himself, since a truce existed with the Saracens. In retaliation
the imperial troops shut up the Patriarch and the Templars in
their own quarters in Acre, cut off their supplies, blockaded the
town, tore from the pulpits and thoroughly thrashed a couple
of mendicant monks who were preaching against Frederick and
stirring up disorder. This was not all. As the Emperor on
the early morning of the appointed day was preparing to embark,
the populace, incited by the Papalists, pursued him, throwing
filth at him and his followers. With a curse upon his lips
Frederick left the Holy Land.
A few weeks later the unexpected happened in Apulia.
Outdistancing the other Crusaders Frederick II landed on
2o6 RE-APPEARANCE IN SICILY iv
June loth in Brindisi — " God keep it," he wrote to the Amir
Fakhru'd Din. His arrival was so surprising that the towns
people could not conceive what it meant when they saw the
imperial standard unfurled. They had long been mourning
their Emperor's death. Not till they had seen him with their
own eyes did they realise the papal treachery. Then they
hastened to welcome their master with joyful acclamation.
The news of Frederick's return spread like wildfire through
Sicily. The whole situation was changed. The Emperor went
immediately to Barletta and issued a stirring proclamation
announcing his unexpected return, exhorting the Capua detach
ment to hold out and preserve their loyalty. He despatched
Count Thomas of Aquino to their help and promised to follow
shortly in person. In the meantime he speedily assembled
troops, yet avoided undue haste. His adherents poured in from
all sides ; Reginald of Spoleto from the Abruzzi with his de
tachment, the Chief Justice with his Saracens and all other
Sicilians who had remained faithful. A fortunate coincidence
turned to Frederick's advantage. A severe storm had com
pelled a large body of Teutonic Knights to land in Brindisi on
their way back from the Holy Land. They forthwith declared
themselves willing to join Frederick. Some Pisans also made
their appearance. If the Emperor once more pointed to the
direct intervention of Divine Providence and God's active
miracles on his behalf he had every right to do so.
It was a remarkable army that assembled around Frederick II :
Sicilians, German Crusaders, imperial Saracens fighting side by
side against the Lombards and the soldiers of the Pope. Or,
rather, prepared to fight against them ; for matters did not
progress so far. The mere terror of the Emperor's name, the
realisation of the Pope's deceit in spreading false news of his
death, arrears of pay, bad leadership, and in the Lombards' case
a strong disinclination to be caught in open treachery and re
bellion against their overlord : all this chased the Army of the
Keys in complete demoralisation back to the frontiers of the
Papal States. The appearance of the Emperor, his mere name,
had acted like a paralysing charm. Here and there the papal
soldiers succeeded in making a stand, but when the Emperor
set out for Capua at the end of August no stronghold could
BLOODLESS VICTORY 207
retain the warriors of the Holy See : without waiting to be
attacked they fled across the border. In vain the papal legate
seized the Church treasures of Monte Cassino and San Germano
to pay the troops. What indignation when one day Frederick II
did the like !
Such was the famous rout of the Soldiers of the Keys and
their expulsion from Sicily. That ended the campaign and left
the world full of admiration for the Emperor, who once again
had won a bloodless victory. The Muslims compared him to
Alexander ; the Greek Emperor of Nicaea sent an embassy, and,
later, costly gifts and a large sum of money for his help. Simul
taneously the Emperor's supporters in Northern Italy succeeded
in conquering the Lombard League. Within four days two
hundred towns had declared for the Emperor. Very few still
held out. It had become important to make a deterrent ex
ample ; the town of Sora, which was still in rebellion, was
besieged by the Emperor in person, conquered and reduced to
ashes, and was to remain uninhabited for all time. The plough
should furrow the site of the faithless city as of old the site of
Carthage, so Frederick later phrased it. It may easily be con
ceived that the Emperor exercised extreme severity towards a
few traitors and faithless officials. Any who had hoped for
elevation through the Emperor's fall should now enjoy an extra
lofty gallows — the chronicler tells us. As penalty for the
treachery of the Templars in Palestine Frederick confiscated
all the Sicilian goods and possessions of the Templars and the
Knights of St. John.
What was the Pope's attitude to it all ? He was in a most
difficult position : the hatred of the nobles kept him banished
from Rome ; his supplies of cash and war material were ex
hausted ; the Lombards had left him in the lurch ; his cries to
the western kings for help were unheeded. Yet not one of
the Emperor's numerous embassies to Gregory IX met with the
smallest success. It was not he, defeated though he might be,
who was going to give in. The Emperor must yield. Frederick
had a clear field ; there was nothing to prevent his conquering
the entire papal territory and compelling the Pope to make
peace — as he did on a later occasion. Yet, at the frontier he
halted with his forces, most prudently still preserving the
208 POPE'S INTRANSIGEANCE iv
unimpeachable tone of moderation and placability which he
had from the first maintained. He was well aware that in the
present state of affairs he did the Pope more harm by this sub
missive approach than by any show of violence. He made the
Pope from first to last the sole disturber of the peace of Europe,
and he reaped more advantage from that than from a temporary
occupation of Church lands, a continuation of the ban and the
martyrdom of the spiritual overlord of Christendom. Just now
the Empire sorely needed new organisation and settlement.
So the German Grand Master, who had already sued in vain
for peace, was sent again to Gregory. A section of the College
of Cardinals disapproved of the papal policy, and so a truce at
least was concluded. The Pope agreed most reluctantly, though
he was the sole gainer. As for Frederick, a beginning had been
made towards peace.
Negotiations dragged on for the best part of a year, and throw
a remarkable light on the overwhelmingly strong position of
the Church. The victorious Emperor was suppliant for peace,
while the defeated Pope refused every concession and sought to
dictate the terms of a peace which he did not desire. This
demonstrates how small an element in the Pope's power was
military strength, and how unassailable was the Head of the
Roman Church. It lay in Gregory's competence to release
Frederick from the ban, or not, and Frederick remained a dis
obedient child of the Church until he had surrendered in every
detail. Pope Gregory was entirely undisturbed by the fact that
the basis of the excommunication lay in the non-fulfilment of
the Crusader's vow, and that this had now become completely
meaningless. Gregory had sought to ruin the hated Emperor,
and, since he had failed in his main object, the Emperor must
purchase his release all the more dearly by concessions in Sicily.
Thus it was the Emperor, not the Pope, who needed peace.
Threats of war did not alarm the Pope : they gratified him
rather. During the whole course of the negotiations Frederick
displayed an incredible patience, an almost inconceivable sub-
missiveness, and it was not his fault that war almost broke out
afresh. At this point the Emperor summoned the German
princes to use their influence on the Pope, and they were so far
successful that they achieved an understanding, after themselves
1230 BAN LIFTED 209
guaranteeing the Emperor's good faith, which left Gregory no
conceivable pretext for refusing peace. He was loth to lift the
ban, if only because this stultified his whole previous procedure.
It undoubtedly created a remarkable impression when the Pope,
in the summer of 1230, again greeted as the " beloved son of
the Church " the Emperor whom he had so recently condemned
as a " disciple of Muhammad." The world was not blind to
the effect. One contemporary stigmatises the whole course of
events that opened with the Treaty of San Germano and ter
minated in the Peace of Ceperano as a "disgrace to the Church.3'
A troubadour expressed himself still more forcibly when he
cursed the Pope and breathed threats against the papal capital :
" It is my comfort, Rome, that you will plunge to ruin, when
the rightful Emperor comes to his own again and acts as he
ought."
It was with a view to restoring his fortune — that is : his power
— that Frederick was willing to accept the terms of this most
unfavourable peace. He granted an amnesty to the Pope's
partisans in Sicily, restored all Church property confiscated
during the war, including that of the Templars and of the
Knights of St. John, and these were the least of his concessions.
The chief place was taken, as of course, by the questions of the
Church's personnel in Sicily, for Pope Gregory was no longer
content with the Concordat of Queen Constance. It seemed
to contravene all Frederick's principles that, for the sake of
escaping from the excommunication he was prepared to make
the most sweeping concessions: the Sicilian clergy — with a
few exceptions — should no longer be amenable to secular law,
should no longer be subject to general taxation, and in the
matter of episcopal elections it would seem that the Emperor
went so far as to renounce the right of consent he had hitherto
exercised. Very different opinions have been held about this
treaty, so wholly at variance with Frederick's victories, but
historians have on the whole tended to overvalue the rights
surrendered. It is clear from the quarrel with Pope Honorius
III that the Emperor's right of consent had been in practice of
extremely little use ; the question of taxation and secular courts
for the clergy had always been points at issue. As long as the
Emperor was on good terms with the Pope such difficulties
2io RECONCILIATION iv
could be got over. In case of war, which Frederick after his
recent experiences must have felt to be very imminent, all such
agreements fell to the ground. The most important thing for
the Emperor at the moment was to gain time to reorganise his
kingdoms, to concentrate his scattered powers, and then to sub
due Lombardy. With a view to this it was vital to have even
a few years of peace, and it was even of greater importance to
have the Church, in spite of her collusion with the Lombard
League, as a neutral, or better still an ally, in this struggle
against rebels and heretics. The moment was favourable.
For in the Sicilian campaign the Lombards had not supported
the Pope to anything like the degree he had wished, and all
Frederick's relations to Gregory for the next few years were
intended to demonstrate how immensely more advantageous in
the three-party struggle was an alliance of Pope and Emperor
against Lombards, than one of Pope and Lombards against
Emperor. This unity of the two powers of Church and Empire
was always dear to Frederick's heart ; he was wholly sincere in
seeking it, and he had the world behind him : it represented
the God-ordained constitution. In this outlook Frederick was
completely reactionary ; he sought eagerly to secure the Curia
at any price, to wean her from the Lombard confederacy,
to re-awaken all the aristocratic elements in the Church in order
to re-establish the old traditional unity of the two powers. He
might be for a time successful, and for the moment the Pope
considered an alliance with Frederick useful on other grounds,
for his position between Emperor and Lombards was an uneasy
one. All three parties were in sore need of a breathing space,
yet the more all three recovered their strength the more ominous
and oppressive to the world at large was the thunderous atmos
phere of threatening storm.
Thus ended Frederick IPs first great fight with the Curia, and
for nearly ten years to come the strife was latent only. The
newly established accord between Emperor and Pope was osten
tatiously manifested to the world. Frederick paid a visit to
Pope Gregory in his paternal home in Anagni, where they
sealed their pact " with holy kisses " as Frederick reported.
The Pope and the Emperor dined tete-a-tete in the presence of
one man only, whose mission in life it was to strive for the
PEACE 211
honour of Church and Empire, and to whose efforts the con
clusion of peace was in no small measure due : Hermann of
Salza, the German Grand Master.
Now the Emperor set to work to build up his power : first
in Sicily, later in Germany.
V. TYRANT OF SICILY
Influence of Eastern success Affection for Sicily
Three emperor models Constitutions of Melfi, 1231
Expectation of Golden Age and End of World
Augustales minted Frederick's birthday a public
holiday.
I.
Liber Augustalis Cult of Justitia Invocation of
imperial name " Crown Prosecution *' Theory of
the " Fall " Necessitas Dante's de Monarchia
The Divine Comedy.
II.
Pope Gregory and the Liber Augustalis Relation of
Church and State Zeal against heretics Muslims
and Jews State organisation : justiciars, notaries
Conditions of service Treatment of suspects
Rebellious towns Augusta Uniformity and simpli
fication of government Town creation ; frontier pro
tection Monopolies — - — Customs and revenue
Weights and measures Fairs and markets The
Emperor as trader Taxation Commercial agree
ments Overseas consuls and embassies A Sicilian
nation Marriage ordinances.
III.
Triumph of lay culture Petrus de Vinea (Piero della
Vigna) — —-Frederick's public speaking Frederick
amongst intimates Youthfulness of Sicilian court
Frederick's retainers ; menagerie Famous families in
his service Thomas Aquinas Valetti imperatoris
Frederick's sons Chivalry at court Foggia :
banquets, revelry Michael Scot Sicilian poetry ;
use of vernacular Intellectual thought at court
Learning at court Astronomy and Astrology-
Hebrew scholars Spirit of Enquiry ; Ibn Sabin of
Ceuta Research and experiment De arte venandi
cum avibus The art of seeing " things that are, as they
are " Frederick's personal appearance.
V. TYRANT OF SICILY
IT was no accident that Frederick IFs founding of the first
absolute monarchy of the West followed his triumph in the
East. This event had brought about a metamorphosis, as when
a mythic hero becomes suddenly aware of his divine origin and
the god in him springs visibly to life. Proclaiming himself the
son of Jupiter Ammon, grandson of Venus Genetrix, or some
other emanation of a Godhead, he gradually achieves his own
apotheosis. From the moment that the divine sonship is pro
claimed the career of the monarch takes a new direction : from
the phase of mere personal activity and self-assertion he grows
in stature, obeying the eternal law of his being by creative
activity in empire and in state.
The Jerusalem coronation obviously marked such a turning
point in Frederick's career. The Puer ApuUae had circled
round Palermo, Aix and Rome, and now as German-Roman
Emperor, embraced the Orient. The whole was in his grasp.
This last and outermost circle bordered on the dreamlike and
the infinite and set bounds to all further personal ambition.
No higher office lay ahead, no new crown was waiting, nothing
could now exalt him further. For the first time the Hohen-
staufen Emperor had f ocussed the eyes of the whole world — the
Christian West and the Muslim East — on the Imperator of
Christendom. For the first time he had proved his mettle
in a world enterprise, as leader of a crusading army. For the
first time God himself — in the great Jerusalem manifesto — had
spoken to the peoples of the earth, and through the Emperor's
mouth proclaimed the Emperor his instrument. In the East
Frederick had caught a glimpse of wider horizons ; he returned
to the narrower spaces of the West, and transplanting thither
the conception of oriental autocracy he proceeded to grow
anew — with his states.
Piling the eastern David-kingship on the Germanic feudal
overlordship, and both on the authority of the Roman Princeps,
215
216 HOHENSTAUFEN ACHIEVEMENT v
the Hohenstaufens had succeeded in raising the medieval
Christian Empire of the Caesars to a unique pinnacle. It was
Frederick's unexampled good fortune to find at this point a
willing and receptive people in whom he could confide — despite
his greatness — and who were able to comprehend him, the
dangers of his majesty notwithstanding. It was his luck to have
a people of his own with whom he could feel at one. The
medieval Emperor had hitherto held a remarkably detached
position ; though he held the torch for all the Western peoples
as lord of the Holy Roman Empire, he had possessed no land
or people of his own, in whom his being and personality could
be merged, as theirs in him, who would devote themselves to
him with all their strength of mind and body and lend him the
poise and weight that the " provincial kings " possessed as lords
of the soil. The Emperor was of course the leader of Christen
dom, alongside the Pope, but only in certain circumstances,
during a Crusade for instance, did Christianity as a whole centre
in him. There was no one " Christian people," and if folk used
the phrase it was a mere expression of faith.
The Imperator was Roman Emperor and Roman King, but
the ancient Populus Romanus, that once had ruled the world,
was dead, and only its empty shell still supplied the mould for
imperial feasts and formulas. And what of the Imperator as
ruler of the Germans ? A unity of German people was never
more than a momentary flash : no conception existed of a
German nation, no common German activity was possible save
in the service of Empire or of Church. The Saxon, Frank and
Swabian Emperors had found their support, not in a German
nation, but each in his individual race. The Emperor knew no
one land, no one nation in which he could rule untrammelled
as a God. Many an Emperor had craved for it and sought it,
always hi Italy, especially that imperial boy who was the first
before Frederick to catch a glimpse of the uttermost heights of
priestly-imperial power : Otto III. But he found no popular
support in the degenerate citizens of Rome, and the inspired
vision faded while the lad himself, only a " Wonder of the
World, " died an early death — a kindred figure to the poet-boy
Conradin, who sought a kingdom and found a scaffold : the
last-born of the house of Hohenstaufen.
NEED OF A PEOPLE 217
Frederick II alone, the last Germanic prince to found a state
on Italian soil, was granted the fulfilment of German dreams.
His success was based not on his Sicilian people alone, but also
on the Empire, and on Divine Providence — as he habitually
stated — and finally, and chiefly, on himself. He also might
have faded out as a mere visionary, a sublime imperial ghost,
had he not had his roots in reality and his feet firmly planted
on mother earth, had he not wisely understood the art of draw
ing more and more on her reserves of strength, while he reached
up to steal the fire from Heaven. Frederick II found a land
of people that believed in him and understood him, though his
majesty might frown threateningly down on them from distant
regions, a people prepared to follow him blindly — whether from
love or fear.
Every great ruler needs such a basis, a land in which his life
is rooted, a land which, be it never so limited and small, yet
begets men of his own stamp whom he can make lords of the
world. Thus the Macedonian nobles held sway in Asia, the
Spanish Grandees throughout the wide Hapsburg lands of
Charles, and under Napoleon the Marshals of France rode
Europe on a curb. Earlier Emperors lacked a nation, but they
had their race, later Emperors had their households. The
strength of the Germanic races — Saxons, Franks and Swabians
— was flickering out ; they had let it stream from them into the
outer world, into the Empire ; they had no impulse or desire,
perhaps no power, for further wanderings to follow the Emperor
as a whole clan wherever he might journey. As mercenaries
they hired themselves to the Emperors in growing numbers, but
mercenaries are not a people, and their obedience is radically
different from the devotion of deeply-rooted racial loyalty.
Obedience, unquestioning devotion, and the mass-strength
of a people was a prime necessity for Frederick if he was to
get new blood into the Empire. A people and a state were
peculiarly necessary to him personally. An Englishman has
recently said of him that this Hohenstaufen was a man of such
a personality that " a whole community of men, a sect, a party,
or a nation, could look back to him as their prophet, founder
or liberator." Frederick II, indeed, seemed by nature specially
destined to be the founder of his own state. Only such a
2i8 MOTHER OF TYRANTS v
creation of his own could impose that restraint and moderation
that was needed by a man who had grown up an orphan in a
strange land, without the discipline of home or family or clan.
This freedom from repression, this personal liberty — such as
no predecessor had ever known — was precisely what gave
Frederick such an immense advantage over the intellectually-
fettered age in which he lived. To it he owed his clearness and
breadth of vision, his mental alertness and flexibility, his know
ledge of tongues and absence of prejudice, and that immediate
personal relation to God which enabled him to outgrow the
bonds of the Church and left him free to stride along the shortest
path, heedless of everything save state necessity. The unique
endowments of this Emperor, if they were not to be frittered
away in dangerous versatilities, needed some firm framework
within which to ply their creative tasks, needed a firmly organised
state of his own devising, whose laws were his laws, and whose
laws, for the sake of this state he had begotten, he himself must
willingly obey. A ruler of this type could submit to no fetters
but those of his own forging. His beloved Sicilian inheritance,
the ancient kingdom of his Norman ancestors, offered him the
opportunity to make what laws he would.
" Sicily is the Mother of Tyrants." Almost cynically — for
in Christian eyes the " tyrant " was the embodiment of Satan
— Frederick II wrote this phrase of Orosius at the head of one
of his later edicts. With sound instinct for the practical, rather
than from conscious wisdom, first the followers of Guiscard
and now the Hohenstaufens harked back in many points to the
statecraft of the old Greek tyrants of Sicily. Now was the
moment when a wise despot was more sorely needed than ever
before in history.
The geographical unity of the Sicilian peninsula, bounded on
three sides by the sea and bolted and barred oi\ the North by
Frederick's chain of fortresses, was the only unity he found to
hand. Corresponding to this we may reckon the unity of will
and power in her ruler, the Emperor himself. The most im
portant link between the Ruler and the Land was missing still
— the unity of the nation : which demanded as a condition
RULER-WORSHIP 219
precedent a unity of blood and speech, of faith and feast, of
history and of law. The most wonderful task that can be set to
a creator here awaited the Hohenstaufen Emperor : the Crea
tion of a People — that is the creation of people — a task impos
sible to any but a tyrant, and a tyrant who believes himself
divine, and who, more important still, can make other men
believe him to be God. For every command and every utter
ance of the godlike majesty must be sacred and the popu
lace must sink into the dust before his " oracles," a word
Frederick II himself employed at times.
Such a state of affairs was only possible in Sicily, for Sicily
was accustomed to it, and this rich, fertile soil peaked and pined
without her tyrants. The Sicilians — half oriental in origin —
worshipped their ruler as a God, and rightly so, for in a land,
as indolent by nature as luxuriant, the tyrant was in fact the
Saviour too.
When the Emperor Henry VI entered Palermo in solemn
state with his victorious army the people flung themselves down
with their faces to the ground, shunning the sight of their Lord's
majesty. Under the reges fortunati, the Norman kings, pro
stration had been the custom, and it may have persisted,
strengthened under Arab rule, since Narses, the Conqueror of
the Goths, had brought the country under Byzantium. Sicily
then was well accustomed to fall on her knees to any wielder of
power ; it is easy to imagine how this ruler- worship would gain
in intensity when, instead of a Norman Count or ordinary
prince, these glorious days brought her the Roman Emperor
for her King. According to Roman Law the Emperor was
Dims, in whose person the whole Empire, from of old, wor
shipped the symbol of the Godhead, and before whom even the
Christian knights, the Templars and their brothers of St. John
were wont to bow the knee. In Sicily, therefore, Frederick II
could count on finding the willing self-surrender that he needed.
Sicily had been the dream-paradise of the Germanic tribes,
Goethe still terms it " the key to everything." Sicily, therefore,
with Apulia, was the Land of Promise to an Emperor who
sought to realise his dreams. When Frederick II crossed the
sea on his crusade and saw Palestine and Syria, the " promised
land " of Holy Scripture, he remarked — with his characteristi-
220 LOVE OF SICILY v
cally blasphemous wit — that Jehovah could not have seen his
own hereditary Sicily, Apulia, and the Terra Laboris. If he
had he could not so greatly have overrated this land that he was
giving to the Jews. The south Italian kingdom where Frederick
had spent his childhood, which he had known from infancy,
remained through life his one true love. He would converse
with " his Apulia " as with a living person, a beloved woman,
and only in the lap of his hereditary land could he feel himself
at home. When Napoleon said " I have only one passion and
one love : France. I sleep with her, never has she forsaken
me, she pours forth blood and treasure on my behalf . . ." he
was expressing kindred feelings. Frederick II addressed to the
land he loved, who gave herself to him, words of affection and
of imagery from the Bible, and the poetry of his time and from
the lyrics of the Orient. His southern kingdom is the " apple
of his eye " ; " the loveliness of his land exceeds all earthly
sweetness " ; " it is a haven amidst the floods and a pleasure-
garden amidst a waste of thorns31; to it he turns "full of
yearning, when he sails to and fro upon the Empire's seas."
" Yet a little while to assure the highest victory to our titles
and an end to your burdens and we promise our assured return ;
then rejoicing in our mutual love we shall gratify you with our
constant presence whom now we can only caress intermittently
with letters." Thus he once wrote from Upper Italy. And
again : " Though the multitude of peoples who happily breathe
an atmosphere of peace under our rule, preoccupy our thoughts
without intermission, yet impelled by a certain privilege of
love we shall vigilantly devote constant thought to our own
beloved people of Sicily, whose inheritance is more glorious
in our eyes than all our other possessions, that she may be
graced with peace and may flourish in the days of Caesar
Augustus."
Such was Frederick's attitude to Sicily. " Sicily," in his
mouth, always embraces the "two Sicilies"; not island Sicily
alone, but also Apulia and the southern half of the Italian
peninsula. With the Sicilians he feels himself completely at
one. As the Jewish God out of the multitude of peoples on the
earth chose himself one — it is not possible to exaggerate the
exactness with which Frederick pressed home the analogy — so
A MAN OF APULIA 221
the Emperor, King of Kings, Lord of the Imperium, chose him
the Apulian-Sicilian people. Sicily is his promised land, her
people are his chosen people, on whom he leans " as the head
on a cushion for repose"; "the radiance of their faithfulness
surrounds us like a star whose light grows brighter still as time
flows by." He professes that sympathy with the Sicilians
" which springs from the graciousness of tender love which a
father bears his sons " — the word is worth noting ; the hack
neyed phrase " Father of his people " dates from Frederick.
A later writing expresses more completely the living unity of
ruler and ruled : " We have chosen our domain of Sicily for
our own amongst all other lands, and taken the whole kingdom
as the place of our abiding, for we — radiant with the glory of
the title of the Caesars — yet feel it no ignoble thing to be called
* a man of Apulia.' Borne hither and thither as we are on
imperial floods far from the havens and harbours of Sicily, we
feel ourselves a pilgrim and a wanderer from home. . . . Ever
have we found your wishes one with ours ; your willing and
not-willing ever like unto our own." These were no light
words. The assurances of love for Sicily, however, of identity
with her people would have remained words had Frederick not
cemented them with deeds.
His early years as king had betrayed little of all this, and no
such expressions then fell from him. As befitted his youth he
had then faced the task of purging his kingdom of the vampires
and parasites who were draining it of blood and marrow. By
force and guile he had combated many, if scattered, forces and
brought a preliminary order out of chaos. He had provided a
scaffolding and framework for the state, prescribed the lines of
future development, outlined the external unity of the state and
laid the foundation of much else. But all this was, as it were,
the preparation of the soil in which ten years later he was to
sow the seed. The second state was the work of the mature
philosopher and lawgiver, who " wove of the whole the warp
and weft," who impregnated the living state with his spirit and
his law and called his creature into life — " as the soul creates a
body for itself," to quote from a Mirror of Princes. Having
created a space in which to work, Frederick's scheme was to
fill it with himself as the law-giving Caesar, who followed the
222 A LAW-GIVER v
deed of force by the deed of love . . . the " prime love," as
Dante extols it in the Law-Giver Justinian.
Here was the opportunity for the Hohenstaufen Emperor to
equate himself for the first time, not in dignity and office alone,
as Law Giver with the Roman Caesars. He could frankly not
compete in deeds of war. But the Caesars had excelled also in
intellectual deeds and acts — their activity is summed up in the
formula arma et leges — and in this he could approach them as
no western Christian potentate had done.
From the beginning Frederick's position had been unique
in linking the Roman Empire with Sicily. Both the Hohen-
staufens and the Norman Bangs were far in advance of other
European princes in emulating the Roman and Byzantine
Emperors. But however much Guiscard's heirs, as kings and
despots of Sicily, might deck themselves with Justinian's
imperial formulas, the plumes were obviously borrowed, the
splendid mantle was a size too large ; till the day came when
no mere Norman kinglet but a Roman Emperor sat upon the
throne of Sicily. On the other hand : however vigorously
Barbarossa might assert the absolute validity of Roman Law,
however effectively Henry VI might impose the feudal system
throughout the Roman world, however these two Emperors
might reach the highest summits, upborne by the glamour of
the imperial name, neither had its root in earth. In all their
gigantic Imperium there was not the tiniest province in which
they could rule with the unconditional authority of a Norman
King. Barbarossa deduced the theory of unconditional im
perial authority from Roman law and no one questioned his
abstract idea — but in the length and breadth of Germany there
was no single village in which he could have put his theory
into practice.
Frederick II had never laid such emphasis on the pronounce
ments of Roman law and their recognition. The Normans had
made their validity in Sicily a matter of course, and the Em
peror's availing himself of them attracted no comment. The
unique and fortunate coincidence that the heir of Norman
despots was at the same time Roman Emperor, and that a
i23i CONSTITUTIONS OF MELFI 223
medieval Christian Imperator not only claimed but exercised
the intimate despotic power of an absolute monarch over a real
land and real people, enabled Frederick II to employ Roman
imperial titles, formulas and gestures with unaffected freedom
and sangfroid. He differed from his predecessors not so much
by a greater mass of knowledge or a more exact acquaintance
with the writers of antiquity, as by the fact that in his case the
premisses fitted the facts. It is by no means accidental that
Frederick's first really close approximation to the Caesars
occurred in Sicily. There were three Roman Emperors whom
he explicitly took as his models : Justinian, Augustus, and
Julius Caesar.
The Middle Ages took Justinian — with Scipio perhaps, and
Cato and Trajan — as the symbol of Justice, the minister Domini
who codified Roman Law ; Dante treats him as a sacred figure,
and he was the inevitable pattern for Frederick the Law-Giver.
Immediately after concluding peace with the Pope the Emperor
set himself to unify the laws of Sicily. In August 1231, at
Melfi, he published his famous Constitutions — the fruit of
strenuous and prolonged activity on the part of the Imperial
High Courts. This collection, representing a sort of State Law
and Constitutional Law, was based first on ancient Norman
ordinances, some of which had been collected orally from the
lips of aged inhabitants, secondly on earlier legislation of
Frederick's, and finally on a large body of new laws (further
increased at a later date), all blended into one coherent whole
by the Emperor and his colleagues. The great codification of
a state's constitutional law — the first of the Middle Ages ; in
deed, the first since Justinian — was deservedly admired by the
world, and annotated by scholars as a work that would be
authoritative for centuries. Its influence on the later legislation
of the absolute monarchies of Europe can by no means be
ignored. The emulation of Justinian was of course obvious in
the mere fact of collecting laws, but it was even more potent
in the whole conception and arrangement of this amazing work.
The spirit of Justinian informed the whole and communicated
itself to his Hohenstaufen successor. The Late-Roman had
still a vivid feeling for firm construction and chastened form,
side by side with an intensified Byzantine-Christian pomp,
224 LIBER AUGUSTALIS v
which betrayed itself -in the details as well as in the whole.
Justinian opened his digest with a rehearsal of his titles as
Triumphator, " Alanicus, Goticus, Vandalicus " — which the
Middle Ages speciously took to mean a recounting of conquered
races. Similarly the Frederick's Book of Laws bore the mag
nificent and haughty title :
IMPERATOR FRIDERICUS SECUNDUS.
ROMANORUM CAESAR SEMPER AUGUSTUS.
ITALICUS SICULUS HIEROSOLYMITANUS ARELATENSIS.
FELIX VICTOR AC TRIUMPHATOR.
This had weight as well as style. It indicated not alone a claim
to equality with Justinian but also the immense importance
which Frederick attached to his work and to himself, though
his Lawbook was to serve the Sicilian kingdom only, not
the Empire. The imitation of Justinian was evident too in
the solemn Prooemium with which the book was prefaced ;
in the rehearsal of the origin of rulers' and judges' powers ;
in the dedication of it as a sacrifice to the God of the State ; in
the devotion of the first laws to heretics and Church protection ;
and in many other details on the Justinian model.
After Justinian, the Emperor of Law, Frederick IPs next hero
was Augustus, renowned as Emperor of Peace. The Augustan
age was the scriptural " fulness of time J> and the only aurea
aetas of peace since Paradise. For the Son of God had desired
to be born under the rule of Augustus, Prince of Peace, to live
as man under his laws, to die under his decree as Roman
Emperor. In the days of this great Emperor, the contemporary
of Christ, himself celebrated as the Saviour, the Redeemer, the
SOTER, the constitution of the world had been perfect, because
Augustus had rendered to every man his own, and Peace had
therefore reigned.
Frederick II conceived it his peculiar mission to bring again
this Augustan peace-epoch and the divine organisation of the
world. If this order could once more be restored his own day
would again be the " fulness of time," in which pax etjustitia,
the only end of earthly rule, would reign over the whole earth
as in the days of Augustus. This faith was not unnatural.
AUGUSTALES 225
The thirteenth century awaited daily, as no other had ever done,
the end of the world, and the prophecies foretold : the end of
the world should be middle and beginning, should be alike
redemption and creation. People hoped therefore that the
Golden Age was at hand and the peace-era of Augustus, and
Frederick II exerted himself therefore that his hereditary king
dom " might be graced with peace and might flourish in the
days of Caesar Augustus."
Frederick felt another bond with Augustus apart from world
peace. Once, and once only, the Saviour himself had recog
nised the Roman Empire as rightfully existing, when he said
" Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's/' Solemnly
Frederick pointed therefore to that moment as the justification
of his imperial office, when our Lord " looking on the portrait
of the coin for the payment of tribute indicated in sight of all
other kings the lofty height of the imperial destiny." Accord
ing to the interpretation of the day the coin most probably bore
the image of Caesar Augustus, the Saviour Emperor. Augustus
coins were also in fact struck under Tiberius, bearing the Roman
eagle on the reverse. When Frederick II, therefore, now re
organised the Sicilian currency he minted gold coins which he
not only termed " Augustales," but in which he deliberately
imitated the coins of Augustus. The obverse shows Frederick's
head and shoulders, wearing the imperial mantle, a diadem
of laurel or of rays crowning his head, and the circular
legend IMP / ROM / CESAR / AUG. On the reverse the Roman
Eagle, a perfect replica it seems of that on the Augustan coins,
and round it the name : FREDERICUS. Frederick was following
Augustus in the smallest details, and the name Augustus was
repeated on the eagle-side. Frederick's love of form no doubt
prompted him for purely aesthetic reasons to revert to the
antique, but a far stronger motive was his sober practical
sense, so strangely wedded to his love of speculative thought :
if his Was the " ftilness of time " then everything must be as
far as possible identically as it was at the time of the redemption.
This renewal of the antique was for Frederick, as also for the
Renaissance, the practical expression of a sincere conviction :
namely, that the age of Christ, and with it the age of Augustus,
had come again.
226 PAX ET JUSTITIA v
That Frederick, with all this, possessed the independence to
substitute his own portrait for that of the Soter-Emperor, while
otherwise exactly copying the coins of Augustus, is the most
amazing phenomenon of all. And from one coinage to the next
it is clear and clearer that he did so, and that he modified the
eagle with the retracted claws to express something of the
greater restraint and tension of his own day. He dared in fact
to be Roman, simply and naturally, after his own fashion. It
will be a question to be answered later what significance under
lay this " portrait "-likeness, and why it was indispensable.
One point is obvious already : these beautifully stamped coins
with their exquisite high relief — the most lovely mintage of the
Middle Ages till far on into Renaissance times — instead of a
symbolic impersonal head, instead of a Christ, or a Lamb, or a
Cross, such as are usual on other coins of the period, bear in
unmistakable lines the likeness of the reigning Caesar Augustus
and the whole eagle skilfully wrought in gold (a metal which had
almost ceased to be used for specie). In all ages of faith the
value of a coin has been guaranteed in one way or another by
th.6 State God in whom people believed: amongst primitive
folk the money bore the Totem-animal ; amongst the Greeks
the God of the Polis ; correspondingly in Rome the Divine
Emperors, and in the Middle Ages the Saviour himself, under
one of many signs and symbols, stood surety for the value of
the coin. On these golden Augustales of Frederick II is not
the smallest Christian sign, not the tiniest of crosses on sceptre,
orb, or crown ; independent of the Christian God there reigns
here a Divus who summons men to faith in him, like a new
Caesar Augustus.
Justinian, Emperor of Law; Augustus, Emperor of Peace,
were Frederick's models ; peace and law ; " two sisters in
close embrace " ; pax et justitia, a formula which in endless
variation eternally recurs, defining the purpose of a State.
This Two-in-one-ness permeates the whole Sicilian Book
of Laws : after the preliminary introduction the first and
weightiest section is divided into two distinct parts, the first
concerns internal peace : Pax ; the second legal jurisdiction :
Justitia. The Lawbook itself Frederick called the ''Liber
Avgustalis " in honour of Augustan majesty ; and the book,
NATIONAL FEAST DAY 227
which was published in September 1231, bears on it the date
of August.
Justinian and Augustus were for Frederick embodiments and
symbols of certain features and organisations of the State, but
another figure hovered before him, more human than Pax or
Justitia, a man and a ruler of men : Julius Caesar. In later
years Frederick apostrophises " yon glorious Julius, first of
Caesars." Whether intentionally or by accident Frederick was
following the example of the genial, open-hearted Julius, when
he commanded that his birthday, which immediately followed
the Saviour's, should be observed as a public holiday through
out the length and breadth of the Sicilian kingdom. Julius
Caesar had been the first to make his birthday a festival — the
omission to observe which is said to have been punishable with
death. Perhaps this was in the Hohenstaufen's mind, perhaps
he also had visions of Caesar's legendary hospitality. Be that
as it may, the Emperor will have fed tens of thousands on his
birthday, for at the festivities in the little town of San Germano
alone, over 500 had been entertained with bread and wine and
meat in the open market-place. Bible precedents may have
influenced him also. In any case the Emperor's birthday was
the first feast day common to the whole Sicilian people : to
Greek and Saracen, to Christian and to Jew.
Law — Order — Humanity — typified in the three Caesar-
figures, a trinity that embraces every function of a State. The
Emperor's Sicilian Lawbook, the Liber Augustalis, teaches what
forces, the virtutes, are potent to produce these three. True,
they are obscured by scholastic-juristic conventions of expres
sion, but they are nevertheless undoubtedly forceful. For
these basic influences went to create the first purely secular
state, freed from the bonds of the Church. This was the be
ginning of State-making and its influence, though blunted and
obscured, has come down to us to-day through autocracy and
bureaucracy. Dante immortalises the picture of the Sicilian
imperial State in his lofty doctrine of the monarchic unity of
the world and the divine kingdom upon earth which this most
spiritual of poets fought for, with a passion as great as that
which inspired this most gifted of Emperors, his forerunner.
228 AGE OF LAW v. i
In the case of a document so important as the Lawbook of
Melfi, which has even been styled " The Birth Certificate of
Modern Bureaucracy/' the moment of birth must challenge
attention. The function of all secular rule in the Middle Ages
was defined in the recurrent formula Pax etjustitia. If Justice
reigned there was Peace ; if Peace existed it was the sign that
Justice reigned. All rule was directed to the securing of justice;
justice was an absolute thing, a gift of God, an end in itself.
The earthly State — a product of the Fall — existed with one task
before it : to preserve this gift of God. This vitally distin
guishes the medieval from the later commonwealth ; justice did
not exist to preserve the State, but the State existed to preserve
justice. To quote St. Augustine " true justice reigns only in
that State whose founder and ruler is the Christ.'* Such a
State, whose raison d'etre was justice, was now completely
transcended.
It is necessary to bear in mind that the Hohenstaufen Em
peror lived at the end of the millennium which conceived justice
to be the sole object of a State — an object to which Renaissance
statesmen were notoriously somewhat indifferent — in the zenith
of the " century of jurisprudence," which marked the close of
that millennium, and which left its mark on Frederick, as
surely as he left his on jurisprudence. We must bear in
mind his visit to Bologna ; Roffredo of Benevento ; the foun
dation of the University of Naples. The designation of the
hundred years that ended the Middle Ages, 1150-1250, as the
" age of law " is amply justified. Since the days of Gratian and
Irnerius and the memorable resumption of Roman Law by
Barbarossa which was symbolic of the spirit of the time, the
world has never shown such genuine interest in any intellectual
sphere as then in the science of jurisprudence. It is true that
this passion ultimately merged in madness. In the late thir
teenth century men began to versify Justinian's Institutes, as in
our day they have rhymed Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.
Such follies at least indicate that there was little left for serious
study to do. Jurisprudence by no means ceased with the
SECULAR JURISPRUDENCE 229
century, but the material was diligently sifted by the industry
of commentators who became progressively more sterile. The
dawning Renaissance opened up spheres of knowledge so
infinitely varied and so urgently important that secular learning
was no longer almost synonymous with legal learning, as it was
in Frederick's day. Jurisprudence, the study of law, indicates
the beginning of secular, non-theological, education.
The Church, on the other hand, maintained her lead even in
the pursuit of jurisprudence : all the important Popes of this
century — Alexander III, Honorius III, Gregory IX, Innocent
IV — were jurists ; a knowledge of canon law came to absorb
theology, or rather : theology and law-mongering came to be
dangerous rivals within the Church, and jurisprudence even be
came seriously harmful. Hence Dante wrathfully calls curses
on the collection of Decretals, because from poring eternally
over the thumbmarked manuscripts Pope and Cardinals
had forgotten Nazareth. Numbers of law-collections now
began to appear. A beginning had long ago been made with
the small but important Assize Collection of the Norman
King, Roger II. The great papal collection of Decretals which
Innocent III had begun and which was published by Gregory
IX in 1234 — " following the example of Justinian " and " omit
ting the superfluous " — was almost contemporaneous with
Frederick's great codification of his first state and constitutional
law.
It is a curious fact that an age which hourly expected the end
of the world should have seen legal erudition the fashion every
where, as if a knowledge of law could avert the Last Judgment.
In all the welter of law-study there was only one work really
outstanding and pre-eminent : Frederick's Liber Augustalis.
Certain hypotheses were here so fused that Justitia herself
celebrated her apotheosis in the Sicilian Book of Laws. In
virtue of his office as Emperor and Supreme Judge, Frederick II
placed himself at the head of the whole Justitia movement,
creating by this means a purely secular State, which, while free
from the spiritual authority of the Church, should present a
complete whole vitalised by spiritual forces.
Corresponding to the duality of Temporal and Eternal that
dominated the Middle Ages, people recognised as a matter of
230 THE MEDIEVAL GOD v. i
course two irreconcilable types of law : an eternal law of God
and Nature and a positive or human law, always at variance
with the former. This human law valid in earthly states, im
perfect as are all earthly things, was based in part on the
traditional, customary and popular law ; in part on the precepts
of Holy Writ, which as revelations from God approximated
more nearly to Divine law ; thirdly, in more recent times on
Roman law which was sanctified and recognised because the
Saviour had submitted to it. The princes' business was
primarily to maintain peace, and since any alteration in the law
inevitably injured somebody and brought disorder, the princes
as guardians of the peace had the secondary task of upholding
the law. Necessary alterations of the law were therefore pre
ferably based on a renewal of old laws that had been forgotten
or misused, and princely edicts were represented rather as the
restoration or enforcement of old forgotten laws ; no one would
have dared to claim that he himself evolved a " new law." The
medieval state was therefore " law maintaining, law-conserving,
but scarcely law-creating," and this substantially describes the
ruler's duties : above all things to maintain and conserve the
laws.
According to the graduated constitution of the medieval
world, the Emperor was quite particularly called to exercise this
preservative function. The correct phrase was " What God is
in Heaven that is the Emperor on Earth." From the days of
Charlemagne the Roman Emperors were the image of God the
Father ; the summit of earthly authority, an image of the Ruler
of the Hierarchy of Heaven, and as protectors and preservers
of earthly law an image of the God who sustains the eternal,
immutable Law of Nature.
The Christian Emperor of the Middle Ages appeared there
fore as the image of God the Father, Ruler and Preserver of the
World. What was to be done when suddenly into this serene
and image-like repose, there burst a new, young, stirring force ?
When a spark from Heaven suddenly leaped out upon the
Emperor enthroned in clouds, and he who had been an image
of God the Father suddenly became an image also of the
Divine Son, the Mediator and Judge, yea the Redeemer ! No
longer guardian and preserver only, but bringer and inter-
FOUNTAIN OF JUSTITIA 231
mediary, source of divine and natural law, the Emperor brought
God's Law into his State, brought Heaven down to earth as
Holy Law, as Justitia. It remained the Church's service to
dispense the Holy Spirit.
An old Germanic proverb had it that God is the beginning
of all law, and St. Augustine taught that " God is the fount of
Justice." If the theorists of the days that followed the last
Hohenstaufen had substituted the " Emperor " in these two
sayings that would exactly describe the actual teaching of
Frederick's Liber Augustalis. The Ruler, in virtue of Justitia,
as the Priest in virtue of Grace, is mediator between God and
Man. Or, to express it differently, Justitia is the link between
God and the Emperor as between Emperor and people, for
" earthly law lies below the ruler, as divine law lies above him."
This expresses more cumbrously what is concisely implied in
the illuminating phrases of the " Constitutions " with which
Kaiser Frederick introduced some seventy laws concerning the
new order of things : " The Emperor must therefore be at
once FATHER AND SON, LORD AND SERVANT of Justitia" This
can bear no other interpretation — in the light of the whole
doctrine of the Logos — than that the Emperor had compre
hended and represented the living God as Right and Law, as
Justitia. According to the revived Roman Law the Emperor
was indubitably the " lex animata in terris" Nothing less than
this mystic identity of the Emperor with the living God, the
Fountain of Justitia^ qualifies him to propound law and so
expound right. The learned Roffredo of Benevento, Frederick
IPs legal authority, formulated it thus : " the Emperor bases his
right on a gift of grace bestowed by heaven," and the Emperor
himself, following the Codices of Justinian, frequently proclaims
that he " receives his impulse (motus) from heavenly reflection."
The Emperor thus becomes himself the fountain of Justitia in
the State : through God and like unto God ; he is the creator
of law, not only the preserver of law ; he is the " Founder of
a new Law," for he declares that new law is begotten of him
daily, and requires that in all directions throughout the kingdom
the standard of law shall flow from the Emperor's court as
streams flow from a spring. He is the proclaimer of kws,
whose tongue is unloosed. The concluding words of the whole
232 NATURE'S LAW v. i
collection run : " Posterity must believe of us in centuries to
come that we collected this Book of Laws not merely to serve
our own renown, but rather to wipe out in our day, the injustice
of earlier times during which the voice of justice has been
silent." Frederick here referred not merely to the injustice of
earlier times but to the actual " dumbness " of justice, the lack
of law-creation, as is clear from the introductory words which,
as in other works of art, constitute a dedication to God and
an appeal : " We hope therefore to render to God from whom
we hold all that we possess, the talent he hath entrusted to us
increased an hundredfold, and finally we render homage to
Jesus Christ and we bring him a sacrifice of our lips by the
statutes of law and the cult of justice."
That Frederick II felt his life and tongue set free to proclaim
the law is thus almost an act of personal grace. Frederick
certainly possessed a peculiar personal aptitude for law-giving.
His enormous knowledge and his untiring research into the
eternal laws of nature lent him a unique qualification for taking
the mean position between the divine law, the law of nature,
and the positive law, the law of man. The Emperor frequently
boasts that he — in contrast to those who judge " without glanc
ing at the facts of Nature " — has himself " studied the true
science of Nature's laws." His knowledge of natural law now
reinforces his unity with God and further established his in
fallibility ; for he goes on to say " therefore we scorn to err."
The Pope under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost may be
infallible in matters of faith, similarly the Emperor " overfilled
byjustitia " is infallible in matters of law. In accordance with
this imperial infallibility, Frederick adopted, as the Norman
Kings before him had done, the sentence of Roman Law : " to
discuss the Emperor's judgments, decrees, and statutes is
sacrilege," a sentence that was so vital to the constitution of the
whole state that Frederick boldly quoted it to the Pope when
he ventured to criticise some measure of the Emperor's.
The Emperor was the pinnacle of the world's structure, who
received directly unto himself the rays of " Justiiia looking down
from Heaven " and radiated them forth again on judges and jurists
A SECULAR TRINITY 233
— hence he issued Sicilian laws as Emperor, not as Sicilian king
— and by his knowledge of Nature's laws he was able to interpret
the divine and natural law : yet, the relation of God to Emperor
created no circuit. In the electric relation of creditor and
debtor the surety is a necessary third if power is to be trans
mitted. Frederick II now sought his third source — beside God
and Nature — in the earth-born right of the people, which he
focussed in his own person by the Roman lex regia. In such
majestic Latin as had not for centuries been heard, in which the
deep Christian rhythm blended with the lofty dignity of
the Roman Caesar he wrote the almost untranslatable words :
" Non sine grandi consilio et deliberatione perpensa condendae
legisjus et imperium in Romanum Principem lege regia transtulere
Qwrites."
Contemporaries and commentators did not fail to be im
pressed by the grandiose diction of these words in which the
Emperor recalled that according to Roman royal law the Roman
people, the Quirites, handed over to the Princeps the entire
power and the right of making laws. Reverting thus to the
critical procedure at the establishment of the Roman empire,
Frederick II — the last Caesar in this akin to the first — obliterates
the people's own authority and lawgiving power or, more
exactly, absorbs it into himself ; himself the divine source of
Justitia. All dignities and powers and mights : God's, Nature's
and the People's, Frederick thus accumulated in his own person
and united in himself. God, People, and Emperor were the
origins of Law which united in Frederick and informed him.
God ; the Emperor as emanation, as Son of God ; Justitia ;
this was the new secular trinity which dominated the state of
Frederick, without prejudice to the Church — and which found
in the Emperor its living representative, " Law incarnate upon
earth." The whole juristic official-state of Frederick II was
based on the cult of this trinity and here we begin to gain a
preliminary glimpse of the Hohenstaufen's great achievement.
God, who for over ten centuries had manifested himself only
in miracles, and as spirit had permeated space, was now captive
to this Emperor, and as far as the state was concerned was
converted from an intangible omnipotent Benevolence into a
tangible, comprehensible state law, Justitia . . . had become a
234 ECCLESIA IMPERIALIS v. i
" State God," much as, in the time of Constantine Christ had
been elevated into the State God in succession to Mithra.
Frederick II had wedded the God of the other world to the
Justitia of this : Deus et Justitia is the recurrent formula ; and
thus, and thus alone, was it possible to comprehend the one
universal God as a particular God of the state — to represent
him, appeal to him, worship him — without the Church's aid.
God had been forcefully brought down into the state, not merely
the state exalted to a world-shunning universal Deity.
Now that God as Justice had become a state Godhead in the
narrowest sense, it behoved the Emperor to transform the
state judicial service into worship. Pope Innocent had averred :
" God is honoured in us, when we are honoured " ; Kaiser
Frederick countered this with : " our subjects serve and please
God and the Emperor when they serve Justice " ; almost
exactly as Roman law had formulated it : "He who honours
Justitia, does homage to the holy things of God." This dic
tated certain observances of outward service. The law entitled
Cultus Justitiae begins : " The Cult of Justice demands Silence."
While popes and priests dispensed God as Grace to the people
in wonder and magic, the Emperor and his judges were to the
faithful the channels of God as Law, as Rule, thus actualising
the theory quoted by the Normans from the Roman digests that
judges and jurists were " Priests of Justice." It was com
pletely justified therefore when people not only spoke of the
Empire as the " Temple of Justice," but went so far as to talk
of the Imperial Church, imperialis ecclesia. Down to the
smallest details this imperial Justice- State mirrors the clerical
God-State which Innocent III had erected with his elaborate
hierarchy. Out of the Pope's plenitudo potestatis God's Grace
is conveyed to the people through bishops and priests ; even
so from the Emperor God's Justice through judges and officials.
A living power of immediately divine origin thus coursed
through the veins of the State.
All the metaphors of the Book of Laws point in the same
direction. The Emperor was the sole source of Justice, and
on the throne of Justice he who weaves the web of Justice takes
the highest seat. His Justice flows as in a flood ; with the
scales of Justice he weighs to each his right ; he interprets the
OFFICERS OF THE STATE 235
law and resolves the problems of the jurists and issues laws to
end their differences. He must find new remedies daily for
new vices, for amid the changes of time and circumstance the
ancient laws do not suffice to pulverise the vicious with untiring
hammer blows. From him Justice flows through the kingdom
hi rivulets and those who distribute his rule throughout the
State are the imperial officials who take the helm in the Emperor's
stead, and are themselves the Emperor's image, even as he him
self is the image of God.
These officials were no longer feudal retainers of varying
degree, but men selected by the Emperor's favour from every
rank, who held their posts not as a beneficium, a fief to possess,
but as an officium, a service to fulfil ; in Church phraseology :
they discharged the service of God. Since these law-learned
officials were appointed by a special act of the Emperor's grace,
which only the Emperor could exercise — the " co-knowers of
our knowledge JJ — he called them — the purchase of office in
the State was forbidden as simony. The official remains an
official, as long as the Emperor considers him worthy and the
charisma rests on him, irrespective of his personal worthiness
or unworthiness. " It is sacrilege to debate whether that man
is worthy whom the Emperor has chosen and appointed/'
The choice of officials appertains to the Emperor alone and
their offices are not transferable to others. There exist no
hereditary offices. None may dare, without the Emperor's
permission, to appoint an official, and the severest penalties
wait on any attempt to do so : the town in which such a deed
occurs is destroyed for ever, the inhabitants are reduced to
servitude and the office holder is beheaded. The Emperor,
however, will see to it that there shall be officials enough and
to spare that justice may be freely available to all and that the
Emperor's " sacred wishes " may be made known. The
officials were to celebrate divine service, the cult of Justice by
which they rendered service to God. The service of the Courts
which officials held daily, and the Emperor himself three times
a week was a sacred act and therefore commands silence, while
the officials worship Justice and sacred justice is meted to
petitioners. This service is rendered free of cost, as the
Church renders her services of grace, for the Emperor's
236 JUSTITIAE MYSTERIUM v. i
generosity and graciousness supplies salaries for the officials
who conduct thejustitiae mysterium.
There is absolutely no justification for taking at less than
its face value the awed solemnity which breathes from every
line of the Book of Laws. There are ample witnesses who
describe the Emperor himself when he celebrated the sacratis-
simum mtnisterium, as was his custom in later years. Every new
cult evolves new rites, and so we find here forms and ceremonies
and customs which have never before been seen in the West,
and have never prevailed anywhere in this combination. The
Sacra Majestas of the Emperor was enthroned on inaccessible
heights, over his head was suspended a gigantic crown ; all who
approached must prostrate themselves ; the whole public re
mained prostrate for a time before the Divus Augustus, who
remained in the background like the very Godhead. His voice
was seldom heard ; before him stood the Logothetes, who
announced the order which the Emperor confirmed by a gesture
of his hand. This spokesman played the oracle to the Em
peror's sacred and inspired decision, which was, in certain
circumstances, accompanied by the tinkling of a bell. Such
was the " most sacred service " and mystery : the High Court
— like the High Mass — of the Justice-God-Emperor.
This is a suitable moment to recall the fore-runners of
Frederick II and his remarkable Cult of Justice. King Roger II
and Barbarossa contributed both to the ritual and to the con
ception : the Norman by the retention of Byzantine ceremonies
and by his creative achievements as lawgiver in a newly-
conquered country : the Hohenstaufen by his sanctification
both of the Emperor and his office, deduced from Roman Law.
After Barbarossa it became usual to designate the Empire as
" Holy/' and " Holy " too the palaces, documents, and edicts
of the Emperor ; the Emperor became Sacra Majestas,
PerenmtaSy Nwnen ; his predecessors Divi. Frederick owed
most, however, in this respect, to Pope Innocent III. For
Innocent had dinned into the ears of the world that judge and
priest are one ; priesthood is royal, and kingship is priestly.
Innocent was the first to imbue judgeship and kingship with
HIERARCHY OF LAW 237
the spirit of the High Priest, which Frederick now turned to
secular account. This Pope who was himself a verus imperator
had reduced the Emperor to a priestly go-between, and had
obliterated the idea of the Emperor's figure as image of
God which had prevailed till Barbarossa. Finally Innocent's
emancipation of the Priest State from all secular tutelage showed
the way in which a secular Law State might be erected, spiritu
ally emancipated and independent of the Church — whereby the
gulf between yawned deeper than before. The domain of the
non-material, which hitherto had belonged wholly to the
Church, had now been rent asunder by Frederick, and while
the domain of the soul remained finally with the Church, the
New State claimed the mind. Over against the Church's
Hierarchy of Grace was set the State's Hierarchy of Law.
Another interesting possibility suggests itself. Roman law,
it is true, called the judge also a priest ; but with Frederick's
most unusual knowledge of Muslim customs, in all his lengthy
conversations with Fakhru'd Din, it cannot have escaped his
notice, that amongst Mussulmans the holy men, the eulama,
were jurists and priests in one. An innovation in Western speech
also contributed. Since about the beginning of the " juristic
century " the word " layman " had come to be used not only
as the opposite of priest (sacerdos) ; it began to mean the man
who is not learned in the law and to indicate the opposite also
of clerk (clericus). It was as a nursery for such law-clerks that
the Emperor Frederick had founded the University of Naples.
Frederick thus gathered together in a fortunate moment
many existing tendencies and evolved the triumphant solemn
cult of Justice, God of the Secular State. Justice was of course
not the " whole God," but she was one emanation of God, the
state manifestation of the Deity. The full importance of this is
obvious if we reflect on the scholastic problem of the day — the
antithesis between Faith and Knowledge. Justice becomes that
manifestation of God which is comprehended by reason and by
knowledge, and which is operative within the state as Living
Law. Grace, on the other hand, comprehensible by faith
alone, remains the Church's manifestation of the same God.
The mental revolution effected by Frederick II is self-evident.
There are two possible spiritual cults of the Deity — Law or
238 JUSTICE AS LIVING POWER v. i
Magic. After the reign for over one thousand years of a God
manifesting himself mainly in wonders and miracles, a God
begins to appear in full daylight, outside and alongside the
Church, a God who can only be recognised by wide-awake
intelligence, as Law. Here the whole tension is expressed
between Church and Empire, both immediately related to God,
a tension which reaches its culmination in Dante.
The Deity was no longer solely dependent on the priest-
wrought miracle for his appearance in the flesh in the Civitas
Dei, the Church ; he was also summoned into the State, and
there by the Emperor rendered incarnate in the Law. The
radically new element in this conception was the fact that the
operation of Justice was conceived not as a rigid, written, un
alterable law, but as a living, omnipresent power. " Since we
cannot be present in all corners of the world to execute justice
in person — though our power is present everywhere — we have
chosen some from the trusty ones of our kingdom ... in order
that what we effectively perform through their agency may
suffice for the consummation of Justice/* These are the words
in which contemporaries record Frederick's conception of the
inner meaning of the State and its officials and his conception
of Justice as a power to be received and handed on. They
confirm what Frederick himself says elsewhere : he receives
his impulse, his motus from divine reflection and passes it on
as instruction and command by which he evokes in the re
cipient " a stirring of the inner man (motum interioris hominis)
whereby the commands of the original motive-force are carried
into execution."
This unmistakeable Aristotelian doctrine : the Emperor con
ceived as the thought-centre and power-centre of the State
was implied in the wording of every law. This penetration of
the civttas terrena by an independent force immediately of God,
demonstrates at once the distinction between " state " and
" empire " — for the Empire was an inactive abstraction based
on an idea, and received its spiritual force through the Church.
The State with its finite boundaries is no abstraction based on
an idea but a living principle, active and potent to its uttermost
boundary. The Justice-God, conceived by the Emperor as a
power working in accordance with law, is the characteristic
INVOCATION OF EMPEROR 239
symbol of the Sicilian State. Herein is the answer to a riddle :
Kaiser Frederick, in relation to the Empire, where his role like
that of his predecessors remained pre-eminently that of the
guardian and conserver of Pax etjustitia, appears" medieval,"
while in relation to his Sicilian State he is felt to be " modern,"
because he is a power at work. Caution, however, is necessary
here. The true " modern " has nothing in his make-up of the
image of God which Frederick II knew himself to be in Sicily.
This dual role — to be, at one and the same time, the image of
God and a living force — this is what makes the whole Sicilian
rulership of Frederick II unique.
This new alertness, this conception of God as a constant
force independent of the Church, links the new State with the
Renaissance. Here we are again compelled to think of St.
Francis — at every turn the Emperor's counterpart — who in
exactly similar fashion, without the Church's aid, proclaimed
God as power. The simple-minded saint saw this power as
ever-active Love, a divine pneuma which breathed in man and
beast and herb ; the learned, almost over-intellectual, monarch
recognised the divine power in the laws of nature and of science ;
the one perceiving the earthly manifestations of the Deity by
the mind, the other by the soul — each after his kind.
Two important innovations of the Emperor's will show the
practical application of all this to statecraft. A remarkable law
which the commentators term " a new law " expounds the
Emperor's omnipresence in the State : the Emperor is present
everywhere to help the weak, who is often unjustly oppressed
by the stronger. By a protective law, the Emperor empowered
every innocent subject if attacked to " defend himself against
the aggressor by the INVOCATION of our name " and in the
Emperor's name forbids the aggressor to continue his attack.
Any man who fails to respect this invocation of the imperial
name will be summoned direct before the highest court, from
which there is no appeal. The command was valid : thou
shalt not take the name of God in vain ; anyone who abused
the invocation of the Emperor's name, using it perhaps solely
to his own advantage, was most severely punished. What a
24o CROWN PROSECUTION v. i
mentality is thus revealed ! In the last extremity a man must
call, not on God, but on the more direct and potent power of
the Emperor, the incarnate Justice, the Helper and Avenger.
No precedent for this law is known.
An innovation which Frederick II was the first to introduce
into secular law revolutionised the whole legal procedure of the
West and shows the active, nay the aggressive nature of the
imperial Justice : the Inquisition-prosecution. The general
view prevailed in the Middle Ages that a criminal prosecution
implied a plaintiff : where none accused, none judged. For
certain capital offences Frederick II definitely abolished this
principle. Where the crime in question was the gravest one,
high treason, an investigation could be set in motion on behalf
of the State, without any plaintiff, without delay, without
special imperial authorisation, simply by the proper authorities
on the spot. For other serious crimes an official prosecution
without plaintiff required the Emperor's authorisation. In the
case of capital crimes therefore it no longer depended on the
caprice of a potential plaintiff to drop the accusation or come
to terms : serious crime was taken out of the hands of the
accuser and — it might be against his will — investigated and
pursued officially by the State. Here is the first embryonic
appearance of a " Crown Prosecution/* a thing at variance with
all medieval modes of thought, so that the commentator remarks
on the edicts in question : " this provision may be said to
embody a new law." He styles the Emperor a " tyrant," and
it must have borne an appearance of tyranny : imperial justice
put into action not in order to secure his rights to an injured
party, but as vengeance, as an end in itself — to propitiate the
State-God, to secure satisfaction for the transgression of state
ordinances. It is worthy of remark that Pope Innocent III,
not Frederick II, was the inventor of this procedure. It was
he who first, with his Inquisition, introduced spiritual disci
plinary courts, independent of plaintiffs, to avenge every insult
or injury offered by heresy to the sacred mysteries. The
matter, however, assumed a totally different complexion when
this extra-ordinary procedure, designed to protect the sacred
mysteries against blasphemers and unbelievers, was unre
servedly applied to the secular law of the secular State. We are
THE FALL 241
entitled to consider this either as a mere secularisation of a
spiritual procedure or as the recognition of the existence of
State mysteries no less sacred than the spiritual ones, and
demanding similar protection. Quite logically, the State-
Inquisition was primarily directed against traitors who were
the " unbelievers " of the state, exactly corresponding to the
" heretics " of the Church. The " High Court " prosecution
was carried through with a special, solemn ceremonial. This
" Crown-Prosecution " indicates a feeling that the worldly
state upheld a sacred, spiritual order, not less divine than the
Civitas Dei, the Church.
This self-sufficiency of the State is implicit in another preg
nant act of Frederick II. If God is present on earth, not only
within the Church's realm of grace,- but has condescended to
reveal himself as Justice in unconsecrated precincts, the State
can no longer be conceived as " sinful " ; a relative good amid
the total evil of the world ; but becomes forthwith an absolute
good in its own right, for God has entered in. The need for
redemption is not at an end, for redemption deals with the
future life of the individual soul in another world : a matter of
little moment to the Emperor. His sphere of action was the
Here and Now, and so large bulked the present in his eyes that
men whispered — not perhaps without good cause — that he
completely denied a future life. His new Divine State raised
another question to at least equal importance with redemption :
salvation after death was a divine and holy thing — not less
divine and holy,- the fulfilling of God's will in this life here
on earth.
Frederick evolves the importance of the State as an. end in
itself, attributes to the State a divine power of healing fully
equal to the healing power of the Church. In the Preface to
the Liber Augustatis, Frederick relates the story of the creation
beginning with his own cosmology (which we shall expound
later) and repeats it again later in certain warrant-diplomas of
his officers. For the most part he sums up the current belief
of the day in a few sentences, till he comes to the most important
point — the Fall. In the days of innocence and immortality
when natural law prevailed and man rejoiced in perfect freedom,
in the golden age of Paradise, Kings and States were superfluous.
242 RULER'S MISSION v. i
Only the Fall imposed the " yoke " of government on man.
The Middle Ages derived the whole theory of the State from
the Fall. Perhaps that is why Dante symbolised the Roman
Empire as the Tree of Knowledge in the Earthly Paradise.
That is highly suggestive : for Dante held it to be the Emperor's
noblest task to lead man back to the highest wisdom, to the
Tree of Knowledge growing at the entrance to Paradise, back
to the moment when man still was innocent. After this point
the Church took up the task, reintroduced man into Paradise,
into eternal bliss, and redeemed him from the curse of mortality.
From the Fall onwards Frederick slightly modified myth, legend
and dogma for his own purposes. From the Fall the Church
deduced Original Sin which imposed on men the yoke of
princes and kings as a penalty for the sin of their primeval
ancestor. The Emperor brushed these moralisings aside. For
him the first men were simply transgressors of a law, of a
commandment, according to the Bible ; as a punishment for
which they were driven from Paradise and forfeited their
immortality. That was the Fall. Mortal man retained the
tendency to lawbreaking of his God-created first father, and
mutual hate had sprung up amongst the people who in such
great numbers now populated the earth. For this there was
one remedy — the Ruler, the State, Justice. Following classical
lines of thought, Frederick deduced from the Fall, a perfectly
practical, non-moralising, conclusion, which took cognisance of
actual human nature and of " things which are, as they are,"
namely that Paradise being a thing of the past, and men being
now inclined to crime and hate, they would destroy and anni
hilate each other but for the restraining hand of a Ruler.
Princes are therefore established, we observe, not as a moral
punishment for sin, but as a practical expedient to prevent
mutual annihilation. The Emperor's deduction continues . . .
if the human race had perished, then, the subordinate lacking
the superior to which it was subordinated, " everything else
would have perished also, for it would have served no further
need of anyone." Nature having been designed to serve man,
would have had no further ratson d'etre and would have passed
away — a current conception that may perhaps be traced back
to Aristotle — a truly imperial picture of the world. For logic-
FULFILLER OF THE LAW 243
ally pursued the implication is, that without the Emperor, the
highest superior, the whole human race and the whole realm
of Nature would perish. This gives some conception of the
almost inconceivably dizzy heights of responsibility on which
an Emperor was enthroned. Hence the stern punishment of
treason : the Emperor was frequently heard to say " the bodies
of others were dependent on his life — the traitor imperilled the
fabric of the world.3>
Without rulers men would have destroyed themselves, and
therefore : to rescue the human race and to avert the danger
of world catastrophe, " compelling Necessity, no less than the
inspiration of Divine Providence, created the rulers of the
peoples," or as it is later more briefly expressed : " Necessity
created kings " ; that is : they were evolved to meet a natural
need, not imposed as a punishment for sin. Frederick's great
art, of turning negatives into affirmatives is manifest here :
rulers and states are not a disciplinary scourge for sinful men,
but the upholders of a world-preserving principle, they have
become " an article of salvation as were Church and priests for
the salvation of souls.11 Christ himself had, of course, re
deemed souls, but " neither the waters of the Flood nor the
waters of baptism have washed away the practical effects of our
first father's imprudent transgression of the Law,35 said Frederick
once, not denying the scheme of salvation but relegating it to
its proper sphere of souls in a future world. Man on earth was
still unsaved and could only be redeemed by the ruler and the
state, and brought back to a condition of innocence, or more
exactly of " correctiveness " by the power of Justice, " the
regulator of human life." Justice thus becomes a world- saving
force.
Thus the Emperor, the Divus Augustus^ the visible bearer
of healing power, becomes like the Roman Augustus the Soter,
the World Redeemer, the World Saviour. What had been the
teaching of St. Augustine ? " True Justice exists only in the
state whose founder and leader is Christ." When the time
came Frederick did not blench but boldly accepted the con
clusion : he would appear, like unto the Son of God, not only
as Judge and Mediator but also as Saviour and Fulfiller of the
Law. His Empire aspired to the Justice of Heaven, nay more
244 LIVING LAW v. i
was founded by her, " Justice looking down from Heaven hath
set up her throne amongst the peoples," the throne of the Roman
Emperor, recalling the divine saying : " Render unto Caesar
the things that are Caesar's."
Frederick II issued his new Book of Laws like new tidings
of great joy in which the long-silent tongue of Justice again
found voice. He wished these statutes to be read as a new
code of ethics and behaviour, and at the close he apostrophised
the faithful : " May our people welcome, to the glory and
honour of God, this work begun in the hope of Divine
Favour and completed under the guidance of Divine Grace.
It is adorned with the superscription and name of Augustus in
reverence for the Sublime Augustus and for the honour of the
Royal Dignity. Receive these laws with thankfulness, O ye
peoples, make them your own both within the law courts and
without . . . that with the victory of your new King a new rod
of Justice may bourgeon and grow." And it was in very truth
tidings of joy that Frederick brought. Predecessors and con
temporaries conceived state order as consisting partly in
punishment, partly in unfulfilled striving towards an eternal
far-off Law of God and Nature, a perfection unattainable on
earth. The Emperor taught that the State herself daily begets
afresh the only true and valid Law of God ; that the living law
of the temporal world is the Living God himself. That the
Eternal and the Absolute must themselves adapt and change
with time if they are to remain living. This was a decisive
break with the past.
" In no wise do we detract from the reverence due to earlier
Rulers, when we beget new laws to meet the peculiar needs of
the new time, and find new medicines for new ills. The im
perial dignity carries this illustrious privilege as an inevitable
condition of rendering service : daily to conceive new methods
to reward the virtuous and to pulverise the vicious under
repeated blows of punishment, when the old human laws under
the changes wrought by time and circumstance no longer
suffice to eradicate vice and to implant virtue." Justice is here
revealed in new activity ; no longer merely a radiation of living
NECESSITAS 245
power flowing from God over the State, but herself informed
by another force and varying from day to day in accordance
with the ever-changing needs of the State. As the Emperor
was, at one and the same time, both " father and son of Justice,"
so Justice was the founder of, and founded in, the State. The
State was in itself an end, a means of salvation, the needs of the
State were therefore divine and necessary to salvation. Where
with the circuit of power was complete in the reverse direction :
divine Justice begofcjearthly law and earthly necessity begot the
divine Justice. The old far-off immutable Justitia lost her
immobility ; filled with life, linked with time's changes, she
could in truth represent the " Living God " of the State, and
by her means the Emperor became indeed " Incarnate Law
upon the earth." The second active force, the force of Life
itself, is here revealed — Necessitas.
The " necessity of service " gave the Emperor the right to
alter law and statute. The legal Machiavellianism of Frederick
II rested on the fact that the form of divine Justice could be
modified by the Emperor to meet the varying needs of men.
He represented and he proclaimed " State Law." Relying on
the phrase of Caesar's : " si violandum est jus, regnandi gratia
violandum est. . . ." King Manfred came to speak of a " Viola
tion of Law," and finally Machiavelli defended the thesis : the
needs and the necessities of the State and of the Prince over-ride
every moral law (i.e. every divine and natural law). Not so
Frederick. Unscrupulous as he was in his choice of means,
his ruling principle was : the need of the State is the divine and
natural law. For Frederick II this was true — though no longer
true for the Renaissance princes. The fate of all " imperial
Europe " hung on the heeding or non-heeding of the tiniest
State necessity ; hence each present need of the state rightly
assumed an immense importance in the Emperor's eyes till it
became a cosmic need, a part of the world-plan of God and of
divine Providence. The needs of the State were absolute ; not
opposed to the divine, but themselves divine, and hence potent
to determine law and modify divine Justice.
" Machiavellianism was born of Aristotelianism " declared
Campanella kter, and in so saying he does, as a matter of fact,
reveal vital relationships. For it is clear that some outside
246 MARRIAGE LAWS v. i
influence was bound to enter into and disturb the medieval
conception of the world and cause a radical revision of medieval
thought. The vision of the imperial lawgiver is a vision of a
philosopher formed by Arabic and Hellenistic wisdom. It is
amazing to see how, with one single word, Frederick II trans
formed the whole medieval conception of a State and filled it
with active life. While the times were discussing whether the
earthly State was of God or of Satan, of Good or* of Evil,
Frederick II soberly announced : the Ruler's office was born
of natural necessity. Necessitas as an independent active force,
as a living law of Nature Belongs to Aristotle's thought, and to
the Arab disciples of Aristotle. It is the new axiom which the
Emperor flung into the medieval State philosophy of the West
to revolutionise the State. In the introduction to the Sicilian
Book of Laws he writes : the people's princes are created " by
the imperative necessity of things, not less than by the inspira
tion of the Divine Providence." In later documents even more
briefly : Justitia has erected the rulers' thrones necessitate —
of necessity. In interpreting the evolution of the imperial
office the Emperor, in this passage, renounces all supernatural
unfathomable designs of divine Providence and points simply
to the Master's words at sight of the coin. The Emperor
frequently employed " natural necessity " to make dogmas and
sacred institutions intelligible to reason. As in the case of the
State, so the sacrament of marriage for instance — without dis
paragement of its God-given sanctity — is a " necessity of
nature " for the preservation of the human race. He made it
clear that he rated the natural necessity of marriage higher than
its sacramental sanctity, when in defiance of dogma he intro
duced the most thorough-going and revolutionary changes into
Sicilian marriage, with the intention of improving the breed.
These precedents were pregnant with consequences. By nar
rowing down scriptural and ecclesiastical conceptions and
theories and giving scope to natural ones, the State was not
driven back on mere force and the power of the sword, but was
led forward to another spiritual conception, with which the
Church had no concern, Nature recognised as spiritual and
law-abiding. Metaphysics, one might say, was supplanting
Transcendentalism.
APOSTLE OF ENLIGHTENMENT 247
Necessitas was indispensable to the Emperor's new gospel,
as a basis for the secular state which appealed to reason and not
to f$ith. The emotional assertion of earlier rulers that the
state was an institution of God's, might indeed be believed, but
could not compel belief. The need of the ruler could be
grasped by reason — without him the human race would have
destroyed itself. When Dante wished to prove that a world
monarchy was indispensable he took up the Emperor Frederick's
argument in the same sense, preaching belief in the saving
mission of the State. Pope Boniface taught that for his soul's
salvation every human creature must subordinate himself to the
Pope. Dante — speaking almost as representative of the Hohen-
staufen Caesars, in the absence of an existing Emperor — retorted
with the great imperial gospel : that for the salvation of the
world each human creature must subordinate himself to the
Roman Emperor. Dante's whole-hearted endorsement of the
earthly State is frequently, even in its methods, a continuation
of Frederick's imperial outlook and teaching. The first book of
the de Monarchia, in which he develops the peculiar divinity
of the State and its divine mission of salvation, bears the title de
Necessitate monarchiae. He expounded the natural necessity
of monarchy for the preservation of life, and almost every
chapter of the first part closes with the recurrent exclamation :
" Thus Monarchy is necessary for the safety, for the advantage
of the world." Emperor and poet were in this at one : hi
defiance of Church and Scholasticism, they attached so much
importance to the earthly State, that they declared it part of the
scheme of salvation, necessary to the realisation of the " better
nature " of man and of the world at large which God designed.
What was there so significant in this doctrine of Necessity,
which contemporaries labelled as a peculiar Ghibelline inven
tion, and took to be a slogan of the Hohenstaufen's court, so
characteristic that forged letters and exercises in style which
sought to catch the note of the Hohenstaufen chancery rarely
forgot to drag in the necessitas rerum? People have often
dubbed Frederick II an Apostle of Enlightenment. He was
the most many-sided man of his age and unquestionably also
the most learned, a philosopher and dialectician trained not only
in scholastic and classical learning but also in the learning of
248 MAGIC AND MIRACLE v. i
Aristotle, Avicenna, and Averroes. In Frederick's scheme of
State- Wisdom, Necessitas represents the essential watchword
necessary to every movement of enlightenment, to every effort,
that is, to break asunder mental bonds felt to be repressive and
against nature — Necessitas, the implicit inevitability of things,
which weaves the threads of Fate in accordance with the law
of cause and effect ; the Law of God, the Law of Man, the Law
of Nature, in sum the fitness of things. How revolutionary this
doctrine was, needs no emphasis. As long as Miracle held
the field, world-creative, world-preserving, all causation could
be abrogated in favour of the providential ; natural conse
quences explained as divine intervention. No one wished to
think it otherwise — even if he had had the power — for no
importance attached to other things ; the God he sought, the
God in whom he believed, revealed himself not hi the law of
cause and effect but in the marvels of divine grace. As long as
the causal relationships of phenomena sheltered behind the
miraculous, man had no perception of human fate : the most
eventful life was full of magic and fairy tale — never fateful,
never ruled by its own laws, never " demonic."
The doctrine of Necessity made for enlightenment in so far
as the recognition of natural laws inherent in things themselves,
broke the spell of magic. In this sense Frederick II, the vir
inquisitor, as his own son terms him, may be called an Apostle
of Enlightenment, or to be more accurate : he helped the cause
by raising knowledge to the same plane as magic. For although
he began by dissolving magic and myth and miracle, he utilised
and realised them too, and even created more ; he did not
destroy the miraculous, but he placed the scientific alongside it,
and thus called into existence one of those rare and priceless
transition moments in which all and everything is valid simul
taneously : myth and insight, faith and knowledge, miracle and
law, corroborating yet belying each other, co-operating yet con
flicting. Such was the atmosphere in which Frederick moved
and had his being — astoundingly learned yet childishly naive,
clearsighted yet credulous : at once stark and hard and pas
sionate. Such too was the air which Dante breathed.
The knowledge of the inevitability of Law throughout the
whole realm of Nature, subjected life to these same laws
FATE INCARNATE 249
which governed the rest. When Frederick breathed Necessitas,
the unalterable laws of Nature, as a power unto the structure
of his State, he evaded, as he had also done in the case of
Justitia> the medieval conception of Nature as a Duality — a
state on the one hand of mortality and sin, as far as mankind
was concerned, and on the other of immortality and sanctity as
far as God was concerned. Frederick II never attacked this
conception. He demonstrated the same natural force and
natural law operative in the higher and the lower spheres,
potent throughout the entire Cosmos — Necessitas. Where this
law held sway there existed also human fate, primarily revealed
in the Emperor himself as he expounded and explained the
meaning of the present need.
Frederick II treated the inevitability of himself and of his
state as a matter of immense importance, an affair of World
Necessity, he himself becoming the Fate Incarnate of his sub
jects. The imperial doctrine, that without an Emperor the
world would perish of self-annihilation, showed to what degree
the Emperor was Fate ; and Frederick states unambiguously in
his laws, " the subjects, under God, draw breath only by the
force of the illustrious Caesar." The fideles, the faithful and
the true, had no destiny of their own ; the lex regia had com
mitted them into the Emperor's hand and their fate fulfilled
itself in his, whose " life was the life of all." As is inevitable
in this type of autocracy he was the sole and only individual in
his State, because he and he only is a " One, that is not a fraction
of another " — to quote Dante's phrase — he and he alone had
direct access to God. On his dangerous, threatening, icy
heights he alone perceived the free towering summit of the
world, earthly need and earthly development, the rarefied air of
World-Necessity, the inexorable operation of the forces of the
upper and lower spheres comprised within himself. None has
ever experienced so directly in his own person as this star-
reading Hohenstaufen, the fates of Heaven and of Earth ; he
felt himself bound with God and with the stars in their courses
in the march of inalterable law. He is the mediator, the ex
positor, the interpreter who observed the paths of the heavenly
bodies to ascertain the future of himself and of the world, and
conversely to approximate the course of finite things to the
2so LAW-ABIDING GOD v. i
courses of the stars. Such interplay between the individual
man and the universal law makes possible the beginning of
Doom and Fate. All great men who have grasped the cosmos
as one gigantic whole have been, each after his kind, of the
same opinion as Frederick II, that " by the indication of the
heavenly will the position of the planets affects the welfare of
the lower bodies." It was natural that this blending of heavenly
and earthly nature was accomplished in the Emperor as the
peak of the universal edifice, in the person who because of his
dual nature was accorded the character of a kind of angel or
genius, whom men called a " cherub " and even compared to
the Saviour. In this blending of the eternal nature, the
" better nature " as Frederick II styled it, with the temporal
nature of man, degenerate from the original model, lies the
purpose and aim of the earthly state. The unity which
Frederick II strove to create, of Human Law, Divine Law, and
Natural Law, which he at first himself lived, is clearly expressed
in the words of a chronicler : " This Emperor, the true Ruler
of the World, whose fame extends through the whole circuit of
the earth, was convinced that he could approximate his own
nature to the heavenly nature, perhaps by his experience in
Mathematics."
It is unquestionable that Frederick did hold this belief : that
he even strove to reverse the process and to approximate the
nature of God to his own imperial nature. He took a much
more anthropomorphic view of the Deity in action than earlier
times had done. In the Book of Laws he unhesitatingly takes
up his position to the philosophical query of the day : Did God
create the World or did God only mould existing primeval
matter ? God fashioned existing matter, he says — that is :
just like the Emperor ! In another way he strives to set God
his limits. The preface to the Liber Augustalis places in tense
proximity the two powers who founded the ruler's office, " the
imperative necessity of things and not less the inspiration of
the divine foresight." No opposition was intended. The in
herent law of Nature was not distinct in action from the divine
foresight. Nature obeyed her own law, the imperative necessity
of things, and if God were not to destroy his own creation he
could not act against the laws of Nature : God is thus a slave
TRIAL BY ORDEAL 251
to the law of his own creation. This was no denial of the
divine Freewill : for God obeyed no other law than that which
he had himself wished and foreseen, his own divine law. Here
was the same mystery of obedience and freedom that was valid
for the Emperor who was also " father and son, lord and servant
of his own laws." He would not have submitted to the position
if he had thereby ceased to be a symbol of the Deity. The
Emperor's laws corresponded to the Necessitas of his creature
the State, as God's law resembled the Necessitas of the divine
creation — Nature. There is here no echo of the classical
thought : that even the Gods cannot fight against Necessitas.
The mystery of freedom and law is to be here understood wholly
in the Christian sense. A later contemporary of the Emperor's
thus sets it forth : The king — he says — is obedient to no man,
but to God and to the Law. The king ascribes to the Law only
what the Law ascribes to the king. " And that the king must
be beneath the Law, though he stand in the place of God, is
clearly demonstrated by Jesus Christ in whose room the king
rules on earth, since the Son of God himself . . . was willing
to be under the Law."
The mystery of salvation and redemption for the Emperor
and for the earthly State lies, therefore, in the fulfilling of the
Law. A capricious God — however merciful — working miracles
and not amenable to Law, would be intolerable ; an arbitrary
Providence, acting without regard to reason or the laws of
Nature, would rend a state asunder. That was perfectly clear
to Frederick. Though the Emperor would have been loath to
forego the personal attentions of a wonder-working Providence
which had been ceaselessly manifest in his own life, he firmly
denied the possibility of any supernatural power intervening
directly in the State and not through its head, an irresponsible
miraculous Providence acting in defiance of the laws of reason
and of nature. Frederick abolished trials by ordeal — not be
cause they " tempted God," as Pope Innocent III expressed it,
but because they defied nature and reason. " How could a
man believe that the natural heat of glowing iron will become
cool or cold without an adequate cause ... or that, because
of a seared conscience, the element of cold water will refuse
to accept the accused." Mockingly the Emperor continues :
252 PROVIDENCE AND REASON v. i
" These judgments of God by ordeal which men call ' truth-
revealing ' might better be styled ' truth-concealing.' " Simi
larly, he did away with the legal duel, another type of ordeal, in
future only permitted in case of treason. This was only logical
and, moreover, characteristic, fo'r this duel was a Divinatio and
concerned the sacred and divine person of the Emperor himself,
in which case human knowledge did not come in question,
and only God could intervene.
On purely rational grounds love-potions were forbidden, and
many other ordinances were issued : no miracle was tolerated
in the State. It would have undermined the regularity of the
State if God's Providence, instead of being itself Law, had by
miracles disturbed the operation of Justice, the State God.
God's Foresight as Law — that is : a Providence continuously
and actively aiming at a state and world order obedient to law ;
a Providence therefore indistinguishable from the Law of
Nature because the natural order was also the completely divine
order — such a Providence is called Reason. Scholastic learning
defined it : " Providence is the Reason of a purposeful order of
things.1' The Hohenstaufen Court disputed eagerly about the
" Aim in Nature." If, however, Providence in its working was
indistinguishable from the Law of Necessity, we must not be
surprised occasionally in Manfred's writings to meet with Ratio,
where in the imperial formularies of his father — at once more
comprehensive, more practical and more profound — Necessitas
still reigned.
Familiar circumstances repeat themselves in the question of
Pravidentia, who, with Justitia and Necessitas, form the trinity
of state-creating forces. On the one hand the image was
retained : the Provisio, the world plan of God, was mirrored
on earth in the Provisio, the state plan of the Emperor. Whereas,
however, scholastic philosophy rigorously distinguished the two
and expressly designated the one temporal and the other eternal,
the Emperor set all this aside and emphasised the practical
extension of Provisio : " as executors of Divine Providence the
rulers assigned fate, share and rank to the peoples, as befitted
each." In this also the Emperor was the mediator and inter
preter of the divine plan who, as well as Justitia and Necessitas,
embodied in himself the Divine Providence as far as this aimed
MOTHER OF ALL LAW 253
at the ordering of the State. Providence was here conceived in
her specifically state-creating capacity, as a continuously-active
force, and correlated with the Emperor. Yet Frederick II
had assuredly not eliminated the Providence of God, active
in beneficent miracle ; he claimed to rule " by the Grace of
God " like every other medieval prince. Divine Providence
had singled him out, him only, and elevated him directly to the
throne, and the marvel of her grace had enveloped the last of the
Hohenstaufens in a mist of magic glory far beyond that of any
other prince, far from the ken of the profane. The purposeful
active Foresight of God did not enshroud the Emperor but
revealed herself in him as the highest Reason: " Leader in
Reason's path " he has been called.
It is almost superfluous to distinguish between this and the
later rationalism. Reason is here conceived as the highest
illumination of the specially favoured ones, the Emperor in
particular, and this is her first appearance ; she is still a shy,
remote, ultimate goal for man into whom God might enter in
this guise. Reason was in no wise merely a means ; the goal
by no means merely welfare and advantage. The " means " in
Frederick's State was Justitia, which also was once " Goal."
Ratio therefore had value only in relation to Law and Right.
" Justly and reasonably " (juste et rationabiliter) is an age-old
juxtaposition, and the new thing is this, that Justice and Reason
are now linked with the Law of living Nature, with Necessity.
It is Law that first yields these juxtapositions : the strong
emphasis on Ratio emanates from the jurists of Bologna and the
blending in Justice of Nature, Reason, Foresight, was a product
of Roman law. All these equal forces frequently merged in
each other : " the Emperor receives his impulse from Provi
dence " is a frequent assertion ; another time " the Emperor is
impelled to action by Reason, not distinguished from Nature."
Ultimately it all points to this : Justice was the living Deity.
She varied with the varying need of the State and was thus
Jinked with mortal life. Justice again was subservient to divine
Reason which linked her to the immortal — & reflection of the
Emperor himself : " Although our illustriousness is free of
every law, yet it is not exalted above the dictates of Reason,
herself the Mother of all Law." The Emperor was thus the
254 ANTICIPATIONS OF THE RENAISSANCE v. x
image of God by his bondage to Reason, above which God does
not soar, for God and Reason are one. With the new Justice,
incarnate in the Emperor, and placed like him between the Law
of God and the Law of Nature, the gulf was bridged that had
yawned between positive or human law and the eternal divine
or natural law : an emancipating achievement of Frederick II.
Before passing to the goal of the imperial doctrine of salva
tion we must review the whole magnificent structure of his
State — like every work of art, a unity. The postulates were a
Tyrannis which was part of an Empire, a transition period be
tween two epochs, a philosopher as king. It is vain to question
whether Frederick's Sicilian State belongs to the Middle Ages
or to the Renaissance : founded in the fulness of time it belongs
to neither — and to both. Sundered from the Middle Ages in
this : that the State bore in its own bosom its own goal and
spiritual meaning, and that the prince instead of steering his
kingdom with a view to salvation in the next world, drew
God down into the earthly State and represented him therein.
Another innovation : this State throbbing with living forces,
associated with a third strange power, the Law of Nature, with
the medieval duality of the Law of God and the Law of Man.
The State thus acquired depth, and the embodied trinity made
possible a living circulation of forces. All this smacks of the
Renaissance. The Renaissance State, however, completely
lacked the hieratic element of the priestly-imperial Sicily, and
lacked too the actual or imaginary breath and universality con
ferred by the Imperium. The Renaissance State was a means
and embraced no world : the prince, the individual of the
Renaissance, might be cosmopolitan and of cosmic importance
—but not the State.
It is a matter of indifference whether we consider the chief
importance to lie in Frederick's adaptation of the conceptions
of Roman law, or the Arab influx of Aristotelian and Neo-
Platonic ideas, or the adoption of the Christian priestly
elements : for all these are welded into a new unity ; firm and
stern and clear is the imperial Law-State based on the three
world forces : Necessitasy Justitia, Providentia. This trinity of
THE JUSTICE STATE 255
power pulses through the state in. indistinguishable rhythm,
recurs in every part as the Three-in-One of Natural Law,
Divine Law, Human Law. The absolute symmetry of this
construction, in which the upper and the lower spheres are
related like reflections in a mirror and yet together form a
whole, would, if graphically rendered, recall the architectural
symmetries of the Renaissance. For these three forces rule in
the Universe as in the State, stand above the Emperor and
below, flow as power through the mediator from the heavenly
into the earthly kingdom and back again, fed upon by land and
people : each acting on the other and acted upon by the other.
This State was a " work of art " not because of its skilful
administrative methods, but because the union of the laws of
God, Man, and Nature made it an approximation to an ideal
original. Consciously or unconsciously this new monarchy
served as a model and a standard for centuries. This Justice-
State of the Hohenstaufen Emperor almost seemed to be a late
realisation of the picture that Plato had once borne to Sicily in
his search for Dikaiosyne, and which Plotinus centuries later
sought to realise in Campania on the Platonic model. The
ground was strangely well prepared, and Frederick II may well
have felt that he had created something approaching the " ideal
state " when he had the entry made in his Book of Laws :
" Sicily shall be a mirror of likeness for all who marvel at it,
the envy of princes, the pattern of kingdoms."
Frederick II remodelled Italy on the Sicilian pattern. The
dream which was assuredly present in the mind of the Hohen
staufen — to enforce these same proportions on the whole earth
" throughout the Roman Empire stretching from, sea to sea "
— was not advanced till Dante painted his immeasurably
powerful picture of the one Roman World-monarchy : not by
a long way so Utopian a dream as is sometimes supposed. For
the poet's model State had its prototype in reality, had been
lived, no less than the platonic State of Plato. His work is
called de Monardna not de Imperio, and in its treble sub
division we see the reflection of the triple power of the Hohen
staufen monarchy. In the first book of this State Gospel
Dante treats of " The Necessity of Monarchy " ; in the second
he seeks to prove that Justice has been from the beginning
256 FREDERICK'S GOSPEL v. i
inherent in the Roman Empire ; and in the third that the
Emperor has been immediately appointed by God as the exe
cutor of the world — directing Divine Foresight and the guide
to the highest reason. Dante seeks proofs, justification for
monarchy. Frederick had created monarchy, albeit on a
smaller scale. The three essential forces Necessitas, Justitia,
Providentia, are identical in Dante's vision and in Frederick's
State. True, the poet's writing exhibits not only the extension
of this complex of power to the whole world, but at the same
time its concentration in one single person, the Individual.
That is the culmination : the world as one unified State of
immense extent and therewith the unity and harmony of the
whole in each unit. Since the days of Plato and of Dante the
Cosmos has never again been so envisaged and so expounded
as a living State and the State as Cosmos. Frederick II, the
Man of Action, only outlined this extension, this concentration :
on the one hand he founded the colossal pan-Italian Signoria,
on the other he scarcely wished and certainly did not achieve
the concentration of the whole in any individual — except him
self. He himself was the first whose soul was saved by the
Sacrament of the State.
Of what nature was this Salvation which the earthly monarchy
of the Emperor promised ? Which Dante with such fire
revealed anew, deepened, extended ? In the early days of
Frederick II, Francis of Assisi in wandering and in word
renewed the sacred gospel of the Crucified : that Poverty and
Love lead to salvation — love to every creature into whom God
had breathed the breath of life. With equal insistence
Frederick II preached the gospel of the Glorified, who — him
self a king and of kingly race — pointed the path to salvation
when, in spite of his divine Sonship, he submitted to the Law
and as man fulfilled the Law. Such was the Gospel of the
Emperor : the fulfilment of Law is Salvation ; the service of
Law is freedom ; and obedience to Law leads to the righteous
ness and uprightness of man. For Justice implied not only
the penalising, avenging power which guarded mankind from
destruction, but was also the corrective of degenerate human
nature which in the beginning God had willed " upright and
simple " ; Justice was the power which led to the highest goal ;
SUBJECT TO LAW 257
to the realisation of that better " nature " possessed by godlike
man before the Fall.
Hence, the Emperor sets up for "man incorporating the
divine idea " the dogma : that " of necessity man's nature is
subject to Justice, and freedom is the handmaid of the Law."
Only by homage to the law of Justice can man attain to free
dom or, in Christian phrase, to the sinlessness of Heaven. For
Sin is slavery.
Justice, therefore, shall create again the naturally simple and
upright man, the image of God. The Justice to which it
behoved man to submit was no abstraction (as, for instance,
" conscience " later became) for — so said the Emperor — it was
not seemly that the Divine Idea incarnate in man should bow
to another order of beings from elsewhere ; rather had Man
been exalted over men. According to the word of the Lord
the Emperor reigned over all men. He was incarnate Justice,
to which mankind was subject, and that man achieved freedom
who fulfilled the Law of the Emperor, who alone was respon
sible to God for the righteousness of that law. The judgment
of God on the Emperor corresponded to the judgment of the
Emperor on the subject. Since, however, Reason was inherent
in Justice, the Emperor was the guide to Reason also. Piero
della Vigna wrote in admiration of his adored Emperor, the
first who attained salvation through Justice and restored the
divine image : " The path of reason required him for Guide."
The Emperors had, of course, been long since styled the imago
Deiy but Frederick was God's image in a special sense, for he
was the first to whom was granted that salvation through
Justice which he proclaimed. Though " whatever the Em
peror decrees has the force of Law," he was above all others the
servant, the debtor, the son of Justice ; more than any other
he was bound by and subject to Law ; and in him therefore
was again incarnate that originally God-like human form which
the Saviour also wore : " From the likeness of Jesus Christ,
in whose stead the King rules on earth, it is evident . . . that
the King must be subject to the Law . . . since the Son of God
also of his own will was subject to the Law," thus declared the
Emperor's later contemporary, and we may here recall Goethe's
phrase that there is no freedom on the highest rung.
258 THE NEW ADAM v. i
Since Justice led back to true freedom, to the state of inno
cence, a further inference follows : the Emperor corresponds
to the First Man in Paradise whom God created after his own
image, the still sinless Adam whose better nature was once
scarce inferior to the nature of the angels. The Cosmology in
the Preface to the Liber August alls points out : " After the
Universe and its motion had been created by Divine Provi
dence, and primeval matter, which was to realise the better
nature, had been distributed among the primeval forms, He
who had foreseen all that was to be accomplished . . . seeing
Man as the noblest of all creatures from the sphere of the moon
downwards (Le. on earth), formed after His own image and
likeness, whom He created a little lower than the angels, placed
Man above all other created beings on the earth according to
His well-considered plan. Taking Man from a clod of earth
He breathed life into him and Spirit and crowned him with
the diadem of honour and fame. . . ." Adam, the first man,
created by God himself, free as yet from sin, is here taken by
the Emperor as a symbol of the first World-Ruler ; he is ruler
over all the creatures of the earth and crowned with the diadem
of honour and of fame, is symbol also of the first stainless man,
immediately dependent on God, who was free so long as he did
not transgress the " precept of God's Law." The World-King
was like unto the First Man whom God created : Frederick's
office therefore and his first predecessor were created when
God created man, and existed therefore BEFORE the Fall, and
were therefore not the consequence of the Fall. The Saviour
on earth had revived the first stainless world king, Adam, was
himself the " new Adam," begotten of God himself, so that he,
like our first father Adam, was free from original sin : he also
was a World King and subject to Law. The Emperor's words
echo a text of Scripture : " Thou hast made him a little lower
than the angels ; thou hast crowned him with glory and
honour." Frederick added to the text (which in the Psalm
applied to Adam and in the Epistle to the Hebrews to Christ)
one single weighty word : " diadem of glory and honour " is
Frederick's phrase — the diadem of the World King which
Frederick wore himself as Roman Emperor ! Almost as if to
banish any doubt that might exist of Frederick's intention to
D I VINA COMMEDIA 259
liken himself to the only two men directly created free from
sin by God — as Innocent III had likened himself to the Priest-
King Melchizedek — his most intimate friend in a written eulogy
directly styles his imperial master " the stainless prince . . .
whom the Great Artificer's hand created man."
Free and stainless and innocent of sin are the three World
Kings, because as men they sought their own fulfilment in
the Law. Another speculative thought arises which equates
the Emperor with Adam in Paradise and with the Saviour : the
belief that the " Golden Age " is near at hand. It was a com
monplace that the Creation (Adam in Paradise) and the Re
demption (the Birth of Christ) were the beginning and the
middle of an epoch, to which the end should be like. This
fulness of time had now come, under the sceptre of the Emperor
of Justice, Frederick II, the expected Messianic ruler whom
the Sibyls had foretold. That this World King should re
semble the Saviour is no matter for surprise, and the essential
resemblance between Adam and the Messiah was set forth at
length to the Emperor by an Arab philosopher. This com
pletes the circle of the Imperial Gospel : subjection to the
Emperor's Justitia leads man on earth to innocence of sin, to
the better nature of unfallen man. If the rest of the world,
taking example by the Emperor, the first human being to live
in a state of freedom, would obey the Laws of Justice, then
Paradise would be realised on earth and the Golden Age would
dawn, whose Deity according to the oldest myths was named
Justitia.
Let us here recall Dante — for all these conceptions are deep
imbedded in the Divina Commedia, in which the poet points the
way from a state of sin back to the earthly and then to the
heavenly Paradise, and to the original God-like man, beholding
God. In his eyes, too, the Empire is potent to lead to purity
from sin. Vergil, the poet of the Caesars, the representative of
the Roman Empire, and of the highest Reason was the Guide
to the earthly Paradise, till Dante, freed from all sin, with spot
less brow, was permitted as a stainless one to enter the Garden
with the Tree of Knowledge. Here Vergil left him, but not
before he had crowned Kim — now like unto the Emperor in
sinlessness — with mitre and with crown.
26o THE HEAVENLY PARADISE v. i
The Guide's duty ended here for the mythical Dante-king.
The actual Frederick reckoned only with the earthly Paradise ;
and because of his indifference to eternal life Dante assigned
him a place in the fiery sepulchres of those who despise im
mortality, the " Epicureans.*' Yet Dante had the most pro
found respect and admiration for the Hohenstaufen. All his
life Frederick II was the model of the Ruler, and Judge, the
Scholar and Poet, the perfect Prince, the " illustrious Hero "
who — " so long as his good fortune lasted " — sought after the
humane, the humanum, and who as a crowned monarch gathered
round him the noblest and most brilliant spirits of the earth.
Frederick II figures in the poet's works, not so much as an
historic character but as an ideal of the Justitia Emperor. The
Emperor's earthly goal : to attain once more the divine image
by the fulfilment of the Law on earth and in the State, was the
exact premiss of Dante's formula of faith, that in every man
the contemplative element needs salvation through the Church,
the active element needs a no less sacred fulfilment on earth in
Law and in the State : " For the ineffable Divine Foresight
has set two goals before man to enkindle him : the happiness
of this life which consists in works of his own strength and is
represented in the earthly paradise . . . and the bliss of eternal
life which is the enjoyment of the sight of God which man
cannot attain to by his own strength without help from the
divine light, and the understanding of this is offered in the
heavenly paradise."
In contrast to the Hohenstaufen, Dante conceived the
heavenly paradise as accessible already on earth to living men.
For man's powers are not exhausted in the accomplishment of
works of his own strength and of the highest Reason: the
pastures of the Blessed, yea even the Deity himself, may be
perceived by the enraptured Love which animates the man
who prays : St. Francis and above all St. Bernard, the last
Guide to the Throne of God. The loftiest insight and the
loftiest deed were necessary if a man was to recognise in him
self the reflection of God ; to see a man's self in God needed
yet something more, illuminated by the grace of the divine
light. Thus, from the first canto to the last, the poet's path
was the path of the living man. The man who, like the
GREGORY AND THE LAWS 261
Emperor, was the imago Dei, and then, in spite of highest
knowledge, remained capable of the simple faith of the man
who prays : to him the Deity reveals himself in the vision in
which the sin-freed man, the image of God, sees shimmering
the features della nostra effige.
II
The Emperor's law-giving aroused the most profound mis
trust in Gregory IX. Even before the publication of the
Constitutions the Pope addressed himself to the Emperor in a
letter which clearly shows how accurately he appraised the
danger of the work. " It has reached our ears that thou hast
it in mind to promulgate new laws, either of thine own impulse,
or led astray by the pernicious counsels of abandoned men.
From this it follows that men call thee a persecutor of the
Church, an overthrower of the freedom of the State : thus dost
thou with thy own forces rage against thyself. ... If thou,
of thine own motion, hast contemplated this, then must we
gravely fear that God hath withdrawn from thee his grace,
since thou so openly imderminest thine own good name and
thine own salvation. If thou art egged on thereto by others,
then we must marvel that thou canst tolerate such counsellors
who, inspired by the spirit of destruction, are bent on making
thee the enemy of God and Man," Gregory expressed him
self not less sharply in writing to the Archbishop Jacob of
Capua who had co-operated in collecting the laws. He re
proved the Archbishop sternly because instead of publicly
protesting he had allowed himself to be used as the Emperor's
" writing reed " for these laws " which have renounced salva
tion and conjured up immeasurable ill," and which the Pope
" will by no means calmly tolerate." The Pope's anxieties
were well-founded enough, but the Emperor was in so strong
a position that Gregory was presently compelled to placate him,
for he had been stirred to profound anger by the papal letter :
it had been no public reproof but a confidential remonstrance
such as no son could take amiss on a father's part. Pope
Gregory had no illusions, however, about the Liber Augustalis.
262 FREDERICK'S NEED FOR CHURCH v.2
It might well seem as if the new secular state, based on Law,
Nature and Reason, and entirely self-contained, formed so
independent and complete a whole that it had neither need
nor room for the Church. Wherever Frederick II held sway,
however, his motto was : a secular state plus the Church,
One reason — apart from a thousand others — was the simple
and personal ; the authority of the Church was well-nigh
indispensable to him. Reason made cle^r the necessity for a
Ruler, but Reason in no wise proved the necessity of this
particular Hohenstaufen's being that Ruler. The belief in
Frederick's person was certainly at that moment still bound up
in the authority of the Church. The Emperor had it is true
to a large extent emancipated himself from unconditional de
pendence on the Church, by calling to witness the wonders
done on his behalf, which proved his immediate call by God
to his high office, the amazing rise to power for instance of the
Puer Apuliae, which he once more recalled in the Preface to
the Book of Laws. It was impossible, however, to sever faith
in his providential call from the credulity demanded by the
Church, for the age was not ripe to grasp the Hero as such, and
the Emperor's power singlehanded to evoke faith in his own
person was strictly limited. To enhance his unconditional
claim, especially for more distant regions where people rarely
saw his face, the consecration and endorsement of the Church
were necessary. It was a sufficient miracle, and a proof of the
personal magic of this Frederick that after the second excom
munication, when the Curia sought by every means in her
power to shake the faith in the mysterious person of the
Hohenstaufen, one half the world still clung — in defiance of
the Church — to its faith in Frederick II as the Chosen. But
in those later days, when he strained to the uttermost the powers
at his command to outweigh the lack of the Church's consecra
tion and support, and when in public he had to minimise the
importance thereof, his whole conduct proclaims how grievously
he missed the Church's backing. The fact that, sorely against
his will, Frederick II provided the proof that the Church's
blessing was not in fact indispensable, was a staggering blow
to the Papacy.
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH 263
The Church was to strengthen faith in the Emperor's person.
More : the bulk of Frederick's laws, the whole cult o£Justitia>
presupposed the subjects' religious faith ; however much the
Emperor might appeal to Nature and Reason as non-dogmatic
axioms, these yet were one with the God of the Church's
worship. Thus it came about that in a certain sense the
Emperor felt a heretic to be more dangerous than a rebel. The
rebel in his folly offended against a law of Reason and of Nature
by revolting against the imperial government, which every wise
man must acknowledge to be necessary. The heretic, in shak
ing the foundation of the Catholic Faith, shook also the faith in
the Emperor's person and the basis of the Emperor's laws. The
Emperor's role of Defender of the Faith, Protector and Guardian
of the Church, was dictated by immediate state necessity.
Frederick II felt himself at one with the Church in virtue of
this office of Defender of the Faith. In the Preface he writes :
" The King of Kings and Lord of Lords demands this above
all at the hand of a Ruler, that he should not permit the most
holy Roman Church, the Mother of the Christian covenant, to
be bespattered by the secret faithlessness of those who distort
the faith, and should protect her by the might of the secular
sword against the attacks of the enemies of the State." Fol
lowing the example of Justinian, Frederick II opened his work
by an edict against the heretics, the enemies of the state. At
the first glance it would be easy to overlook the skill and thought
which introduced this sole and only allusion in the whole Liber
Augtistatis to the relation between Church and State. Other
wise it contains only casual instructions about the Sicilian
clergy. It has been held that the heresy edict was a courteous
gesture toward the Pope : it was in fact almost the exact
opposite. It was intended to demonstrate to the Church that
she could not dispense with the protection of the State. This
reminder of the princely protectorship brought into relief the
one and only relation in which the Church showed dependence
on the State. The Emperor studiously avoided mention of
any other relationship, for every other would have impaired the
self-contained integrity of the State. There could be no graver
misconception than to read into the frequent emphasising of
the imperial protectorship a weak amiability towards the Pope,
264 AGAINST HERETICS v.2
or, worse, to interpret as hypocritical zeal Frederick IPs cam
paign of fire and sword against the " plague of heresy." Other
things were here decisive. The Catholic Faith was conceived
by Frederick as a State Religion in an almost classical sense :
it might be in a wider sense a universal faith, immediately,
however, it was the religion of the State. Frederick followed
Justinian in opening his Lawbook with an edict against here
tics ; in each case Hohenstaufen and Byzantine meant no more
than to set a seal on the religion whereon State and Laws alike
were founded. The strictly state-conception of religion is
brought out much more strongly in the phrasing of the edicts
designed for Sicily than in those relating to the Empire.
Frederick II always emphasised the co-existence of Imperium
and Sacerdotium in the Roman Empire — for here the Church
was primarily the tie that bound in spiritual unity the many-
peopled Empire — while for self-contained Sicily the State was
not dependent on the universal Church, nor was the Church
even co-ordinate with the State, but the State embraced the
Church as a protegee and absorbed her. In the Sicilian edict,
therefore, the Papacy is not even alluded to, and the Roman
Church is only casually mentioned as the orthodox one, which
is to be considered the head of all other churches. For heresy
was for Frederick II not a crime against the Church, but a
blasphemy against God and therefore treason against the Bong's
Majesty, and a crime against the State.
Frederick's great predecessor as verus imperator, Pope
Innocent III, who was to the marrow an imperial statesman,
equated heresy and treason when he said it was a graver thing
to offend against heavenly than earthly majesty. There is an
echo of the Pope's words in Frederick's Coronation edicts of
1220, but this is the first occasion of his translating the doctrine
into state action. In the Sicilian edict it runs : " We condemn
most severely the increase of heretics in Sicily and we command
for the present : that the crime of heresy, the heresy of any and
every accursed sect — under whatever name the sectaries are
known — shall be accounted a crime against the State, as it is
in the ancient Roman laws. It must be condemned as a yet
more heinous offence than a crime against our own Majesty,
because it is a manifest attack on the matter of the Divine
CRIME AGAINST STATE 265
Majesty, though when the sentence is pronounced the one
punishment does not exceed the other." In the whole edict
there is no question of the identity of the two powers. Heresy
is a direct crime against the State, against God, against the
injured Majesty of the Emperor. The boundary lines between
God and Emperor are indeed even more fluid than usual ; even
the slight rise from the imperial to the divine majesty is neutral
ised by the anti-climax that in each case the penalty is the
same, and, finally, the imperial majesty is not even directly
balanced against the Majesty of God. For the phrase is the
" matter of the Divine Majesty " ! Was God to be understood
by this ? — or the Emperor himself ? The suggestion that the
Emperor was meant must have been possible, for Pope Innocent
IV when he revived the imperial heresy-edict in 1254 changed
the word " materiam " into " injuriam" whereby the whole point
was lost. The clause now read " an attack to the injury of the
Divine Majesty " instead of " against the matter of the Divine
Majesty." It is very clear that the one-sided relation of the
State to God was now counterbalanced by the Deity's being
imported into the State : the heretic injures God and thereby
the Emperor, the rebel in injuring the Emperor commits, at
the same time, a crime directly against God.
This position is not nearly so clear when set forth in the
imperial laws against heretics ; the corresponding passage
simply runs: "When our Illustriousness is incensed against
contemners of our name, when we condemn in their own
person and by the disinheritance of their children those accused
of treason, it is both just and seemly that we should be the
more incensed against those who blaspheme the Divine Name
and those who lower the Catholic Faith. . . ." And even when
the Emperor poses as the God of Vengeance who punishes the
guilt of the heretic unto the second generation, "... so that the
children, in memory of their father's crime may pine in misery
and know in truth that God is a Jealous God, powerful to visit
the sins of the father upon the children . . . ," he is here an
image only of the Deus zefotes, not " the matter of the Divine
Majesty." The method of heretic hunting demonstrates more
clearly than words that it was only in Sicily that heresy was
directly treated and pursued as a crime against the State ; for
266 HERESY AND TREASON v.a
the Sicilian Inquisitors were not agents of the Church but
imperial officials, who interpreting Frederick's wishes did not
split hairs over the distinction between heretics, who through
God injured the Emperor, and rebels who through the Emperor
blasphemed God, but consigned both alike to the flames till
Pope Gregory himself was horrified, and intervened to mitigate
Frederick's zeal. There is no basis for the supposition that
the " liberal-minded and f reethinking " Hohenstaufen perse
cuted the luckless heretics only at the instigation of the Church :
the " accursed sectaries whatever they like to call themselves "
had nothing to hope for but a fiery death. It happened that
this was one of the few laws of Frederick's that really pleased
the Church, and Frederick II had no hesitation in gratifying
the Church in the matter on all occasions. In 1238 the severer
Sicilian edict was extended to the whole Empire, and in 1254
incorporated at the Pope's command in the Statute Books and
Town Laws.
As the Emperor himself pointed out, his whole heresy
legislation was closely modelled on Roman law. Heresy was
treason, for God and Emperor were one. In imperial Rome
there was no crimen laesae Romanae religionis (Tertullian first
evolved this conception) ; under the Emperors religious crime
is treason. In accordance with this idea Frederick II described
heresy as "perduellio" high treason against the State— in Sicily
only. The word is used here only, and the imperial Chancery
was well skilled, as has always been acknowledged, in its choice
of words.
The heretics were guilty of high treason, plague-carriers,
enemies of the State, as their interpretation of Scripture proved :
for they held that God was to be obeyed, rather than man ; a
doctrine ill adapted to Frederick's state, whose dogma ran
" over men a MAN is set."
People have detected in this an inner contradiction, "the
Freethinker legislates against heresy." Even if there is some
thing in common between the free mind of the Emperor and
the mind of the heretic, in that both release certain vital forces,
the Emperor was lord over these forces, and in his hands under
LIMITS OF TOLERANCE 267
well-defined conditions subject to well-defined laws they
could prove potent and beneficent. The same forces released
by unauthorised persons were dangerous and destructive.
For the Emperor personally the dictum might be valid : the
Emperor must obey God and not man, but no lesser indi
vidual had the right to arrogate to himself this, or any other,
imperial privilege. His whole life long, therefore, even in
his last and bitterest struggle with the Church, Frederick
strenuously repudiated any and every sympathy with heretics.
When he was besieged on one occasion they approached
and offered help, but were spurned on the instant. They were
destroyers in his eyes of that world unity which he represented,
though in order to preserve it he often had recourse to anti-
dogmatic allies. Dante assigns to Frederick therefore a place,
not among the sectaries, but among the Epicureans, those
who despise a future life.
Another contradiction of Frederick's has been detected in
his persecuting heresy at the same time that he * tolerated '
Muhammadans, Jews, and orthodox Greeks. Frederick's
relation to the non-Christian elements in his State is one of the
most instructive items in his statesmanship, more especially
when we study the limits of his complaisance. Compared with
the mixture of races and religions and the peaceful co-existence
in Norman times of Christians, Saracens, and Jews, living side
by side in harmony, the freedom of the non-Christians had
been very considerably curtailed under Frederick — not for the
sake of religion, or of the Pope or of the Church, but for
the sake of the State. Frederick's sympathy for professors of
another faith, in which he displayed a broadmindedness shared
by very few of his contemporaries, extended only so far as they
were serviceable to the State and laid no hand upon its sancti
ties. To avoid any penetration by non-Christians he had, as
we have seen, segregated them completely from the very first.
He removed the Saracens from the island of Sicily and planted
them in Lucera. After he had thus neutralised the Muslim
poisons that threatened hostility and confusion to the State,
he could afford to be tolerant of their religious observances, as
he always showed himself tolerant of any good customs of
conquered rebels.
268 USURY v.2
The same principle governed his conduct towards the Jews.
In one of his first ordinances, issued after his return from
Germany, Frederick laid down that Jews must be distinguished
from Christians by their dress and must grow their beards " so
that the rites of the Christian faith may not be confused." Any
offender was punished by the confiscation of his goods, or, if
he was poor, by branding on the forehead — not from«religious
intolerance but to preserve order in the State. For the rest
the Jews were permitted, nay obliged, to live according to their
own religious laws unless these were harmful to the State.
Many of their religious practices were even advantageous and
some were therefore specified in the Liber Augustalisi "We
exempt the Jews from obedience to our usury laws. They are
not to be accused of usury forbidden by God, since — as is well
known — they are not subject to the laws of the blessed Fathers
of the Church." The moment injury accrued to the State the
Emperor's toleration was at an end. An alleged ritual murder
by Jews was brought up before the Emperor. Thanks to his
astounding knowledge of foreign rites he immediately saw the
baselessness of the accusation, but he declared that if it had
proved that the Hebrew ritual demanded such human sacrifice
he would be prepared immediately to massacre every Jew in
the Empire. On the other hand, he constantly intervened
against the Church on behalf of the Jews, but there was a special
reason for that. In the age-old dispute whether the Jews as
foreigners came under the jurisdiction of the State, or as infidels
under the jurisdiction of the Church, Frederick II naturally
decided for the former — to the intense annoyance of Pope
Gregory. On the same principle he brought the Jews into the
scheme of the State. In Norman days they had been mainly
attached as serfs to churches and monasteries. Frederick II
emancipated them almost entirely from this relationship, and
rarely or never again farmed out his rights over the Jews any
more than his other crown rights ; he insisted all the more
strongly on their direct private bond to his own person. Even
in the Empire the elected bishop of the Jews was replaced by
an appointed Jewish master, who was practically a state official.
In order that the State might gain the maximum advantage
from its Jewish subjects, Frederick II, with unerring instinct
JEWISH MONOPOLIES 269
contrived to link the Jew-monopoly with the renewed trade-
monopolies, particularly the dye and silk works. To his
private Jewish serfs the Emperor entrusted the state dyeworks,
the manufacture of silk and the commerce in silk — matters in
which the Jews had traditional skill and experience — with
advantage to both parties, Emperor and Jew. This had noth
ing whatever to do with tolerance ; it was simply part of
Frederick's usual policy to turn even the smallest force to the
advantage of the State and to let nothing be wasted.
This solution meant, in fine, that the servitude of the Jews
should be so organised and utilised, that their own industrial
life might directly benefit the State. The non-Christians, on
the other hand, being thus incorporated in the State, enjoyed
in Sicily and in the other imperial territories, a State protection,
such as rarely fell to their lot elsewhere. It was clearly stated
" the master shall be honoured in his servants," and again " no
innocent man shall be oppressed because he is a Jew or a
Saracen." There was no suggestion of equal citizenship. An
assassination cost the guilty community 100 Augustales if the
victim was a Christian and 50 if he were a Saracen or a Jew.
Conversion from Catholicism to Islam or to Judaism was
severely punished according to existing laws. It was of course
permissible for Jews or Muslims to seek baptism. We may be
permitted to doubt whether Frederick II encouraged the step,
for he lost his serf tax and his poll tax and the birth and mar
riage tax and many another imposition. Whatever the under
lying reasons, the fact is incontestable : the Emperor was, on
the whole, averse to changes of faith. Frederick's whole policy
in the Jew and Saracen questions may be summed up by saying
that the true statesman finds no material without its uses.
Frederick II persecuted no man for his belief. He had his
hands full persecuting rebels and heretics for their unbelief.
It is illogical to argue that toleration of other genera should
involve a toleration of degenerates — for heretics were degene
rates in Frederick's eyes — who rent the " coat without seam "
and tore asunder the unity of the State. The contradiction lies
not with the Emperor, but in the failure to recognise that
heretics were for Frederick enemies of the State, much more
than enemies of religion. The misunderstanding is based
27o INTOLERANCE v.2
secondly on a false and arbitrary application of post- Reforma
tion ideas of toleration originating in the days when Protestan
tism was an independent religion and included sectaries. The
misapplication of these ideas to Frederick in his relations with
sectaries and non-Christians, is all the more dangerous as it
tempts to false generalisations about Frederick's character,
representing him as an enlightened and tolerant potentate — an
artificial picture that does not fit the facts.
In regard to his personal inclinations — especially wherever
the sanctities of the State were at stake — Frederick II was in
fact probably the most intolerant Emperor that ever the West
begot. No Emperor was ever, both in claim and in act, so
uncompromisingly the JUDGE as Frederick II. As judge he
lived for centuries in the memories of men, as judge they awaited
his second coming as the avenger of human degeneracy. A
tolerant judge is like hike-warm fire.
The Emperor, who felt no hate to the non-Christian, showed
himself in very deed a " Jealous God " towards rebels and here
tics, offenders against the Deity Justitia and the sanctified order
of the State ; a very fanatic, obsessed by a primeval hate that
pursued its victim remorselessly to the second and third genera
tion. The most appalling punishments seemed too mild for
such offenders. The edict against those heretics who — to
quote the Emperor — called themselves " Sufferers" Patarenes,
after the " passion " of the heroic martyrs, closes with a blood
curdling taunt : " We therefore command by this our law that
these accursed * Sufferers ' shall in fact suffer the passion of
that death they lust for : that they be condemned to the flames
and burnt alive in the sight of all men ; nor shall we regret that
we thus fulfil their own desire."
The Emperor's mission as Protector of the Church gave him
his only opportunity to draw the universal Roman Church into
his State, even to subordinate her to the State as in need of
protection. On the other hand, the Church was indispensable
to him, for his whole State with its laws was founded on the
Catholic faith. This relationship of mutual dependence was
quite in harmony with Frederick IPs conception of all human
and divine relationships, and however greatly he might magnify
his protective office till he even filled the role of the Avenging
STATECRAFT 271
God, he never hesitated freely to admit that the Pope stood to
the Emperor as the father to a child, or as the Sun to the Moon,
Even in the heat of battle Frederick always conceded the
position, though reiterating that the moon was none the less
an independent heavenly body. This was no sign of weakness.
It testifies to a higher degree of inner freedom, security and
highmindedness, calmly to acknowledge a superior than to deny
him. Dante devotes a special book to depicting a World-
monarch whose independence of the Pope and immediate
relationship to God the poet seeks to prove. It might be a
portrait of Frederick. He concludes with words that might
easily be Frederick's own : " Let Caesar evince that respect
for Peter which the first born son must display towards his
father, that he, in the light of the paternal favour, may more
radiantly illumine the earth, over which he is set by Him alone
who is the Director of all that is spiritual and of all that is
worldly."
The " once and for all " factor in Frederick's imperial meta
physics has already been pointed out. They were centred in
the person of just this one Emperor and were valid only in just
this one moment of time. What the world, however, seized
upon, and what each of the European states sooner or later,
directly or indirectly, adopted was the technique of statecraft
which Frederick had deduced from his metaphysics : the
administrative body of jurists ; the bureaucracy of paid officials ;
the financial and economic policy.
This is not the place to pursue the development of all this
nor its gradual modification. The ma-gJTng of State in time
asserted themselves everywhere ; first, of course, in the neigh
bouring Romance kingdoms, in France and Aragon as well as
in divided Italy, perhaps in Castile too, even before the end
of the century. The new system of administration with its
officials in the king's pay was inevitable in time to come. Such
a scheme, immeasurably more amenable to the ruler than
the feudal degrees, gave a security hitherto undreamt of and
the possibility of developing a comprehensive well-planned
organisation deriving from one central authority. The feeling
272 JUSTICIARS v.2
was never wholly absent that the Jurist State had had its origin
in reaction against the Church while utilising Church methods
throughout. What unholy danger threatened the Church in
this spiritually independent bureaucracy was acutely expressed
by Napoleon during his own struggle against Pope and Church :
" II faut faire agir les tribunaux, opposer robe a robe, esprit de
corps a esprit de corps. Les juges sont, dans leur genre, une
espece de theologiens comme les pretres ; ils ont aussi leurs
maximes, leurs regies, leur droit canon. On a toujours vu
radministration echouer dans ses luttes contre les pretres ; la
monarchic n'a pu resister au clerge qu'en lui opposant les
parlements." This mighty soldier with his eye for the essential,
got to the root of things when he called on the judges for help
against the clergy, as the only group of state officials in his day
bound together by a common spirit.
This gives us a measure of Frederick's genius. He was the
first to create this intellectual order within the state and to make
it an effective weapon in his fight with the Church — bound
together from its birth by sacred ties in the priestly-Christian
spirit of the age, and uplifted to the triumphant cult of the
Deity Justitia.
The organisation of this first western bureaucracy, this
priesthood of Justitia, is necessarily hieratic. Frederick him
self styles the body of officials the " Order of Justitia " or the
" Order of Officials." Rigid precedence is clearly marked in
the most important department, that of the Justiciaries, as is
indicated by the Latin nomenclature of the highest grades
which are traditionally called the Magister Jtistitiarius and the
Magnae Cwriae Magister Justitiarius. According to the new
orders of 1239, three grades are recognised ; the Justiciars,
governors of the ten provinces ; Master- Justiciars, governors
of the two halves of the kingdom — peninsula and island — and
the Grand Master Justiciar, the head of the whole judicial
administration who acted in place of the divine Emperor as
Grand Master of the Order, much as the German Grand Master
of the Teutonic Order in place of Christ. There is no question
of Sicily's having " copied " the Order-organisation. In those
days it was inevitable that any intellectual body of men of the
vita actwa must approximate their organisation to that of the
OFFICIAL OBLIGATIONS 273
knightly orders. It was in fact the case that the Prussian State
under the Teutonic Order was more akin than any other to
imperial Sicily, because Sicily and Prussia were the only two
States whose constitution was based on a rational system. It
is not irrelevant to compare the far-off State of the Teutonic
Order ; if the Sicilian bureaucracy was modelled on similar
lines to the Order, the office-holders amongst the Teutonic
Knights were speedily officialised under the influence of the
Sicilian model, with which the German Grand Master, Her
mann of Salza, was of course intimately conversant. In com
plete contrast to the Templars and the Knights of St. John, the
bearers of high office amongst the Teutonic Knights — Marshals
and Commanders for instance — soon became " officials " whose
functions were quite obviously in certain things under Sicilian
influence. The Sicilian bureaucracy, itself the earliest intel
lectual state corporation of the Middle Ages, is at least as
closely related to the knightly orders as to the modern state
services to which people have retrospectively compared it.
Frederick II endeavoured to inspire the new body of officials
with something akin to the esprit de carps of the Orders. The
Justiciars were to know no other ties than those that bound
them to the Emperor and the service of Justitia, they must
have no private interests in their own province. They were
most sternly forbidden therefore to possess money or land
within their official district, to take part in any sale or purchase,
exchange or presentation. Even a son might not possess pro
perty in his father's province. The Justiciars must be " clean
handed," they must not seek to enrich themselves, by venality
or bribery, oppression or any other variety of corruption,
but must be content with the salary allotted to them by the
Emperor's grace. When they were holding courts in remote
corners of their province they must accept no hospitality except
purely official hospitality . For the duration of their office they
must enter into no contract in their province, nor betrothal,
nor marriage, nor any other. Inasmuch as most of the Justiciars
were also fief-holders they could not, in any case, marry without
the Emperor's permission. They were not even permitted —
274 GUARANTEES v. 2
certainly not in later times — to bring their wives with them
into their official districts.
The principle that the official must be free from all private
obligations is emphatically stressed. The justiciar must not
be a native of the province under his jurisdiction, after his
appointment he must draw no servant from his province, and,
in order to prevent any kind of settling down, the offices must
be yearly interchanged. Later it was generally laid down— in
accordance with ancient Roman custom and the practice of the
Lombard towns— that all officials held office for one year only,
at the end of which they had to render an account, after which
it was in the Emperor's competence to reappoint these pro
consuls and propraetors for a further term of office.
This had many advantages : on the one hand the authority
of the official was enhanced and his position magnified by this
aloofness. He became the reflection of the Emperor. On
the other hand every possibility of treachery or venality wras
eliminated by the " wholesome forethought " of the Emperor.
Arrangements were made in such a way that the officials con
stituted a mutual check on each other, and this reciprocal
vigilance extended down to the humblest grades. Frederick II
almost always took further guarantees of various kinds for the
good faith of his officials — who were in their degree omnipotent.
They almost all had landed possessions or relations in other
provinces, wThom the Emperor could lay hands on if they
played him false.
Except on Sundays and holidays, the justiciars had to sit
daily — courts had previously been held only once a month.
They had no permanent headquarters, for their main duty was
continuously to tour their provinces, to hold courts, to oversee
the land, to keep a lookout for suspicious characters, to pursue
traitors or secret rebels. It was no light task to be an imperial
official. All private life ceased for the duration of the office.
In addition to the current work of their circuits, the speedy
despatch of which was their first duty — no case was allowed to
extend over more than two months — almost every justiciar
constantly, at times almost daily, received a mass of special
orders and special instructions from the Emperor relating to
every department of life : law, finance, army, administration,
CHECKS ON OFFICIALS 275
university, agriculture, building, punishment, investigation,
feudal affairs, marriage negotiations, and finally purely personal
affairs of the Emperor's, to do with his hunting, his falcons, his
horses, the game, the extermination of wolves and vermin, and
the like. There were no sinecures in Frederick's service :
Frederick II kept the whole State breathlessly on the run even
when he himself was at a distance. The omnipotence of the
officials and their very considerable independence was to a
certain extent limited and bridled by these direct interventions
of the Emperor ; they were responsible moreover with life and
property for any injury to the State. In addition to the check
exercised by the one official on the other, the subjects had,
twice a year, the right to present complaints and each official
was under the supervision of his superior. The functions of
each were clearly defined and strict subordination enforced.
The Emperor strove in every conceivable manner to forestall
any official arrogance. It is doubtful whether he was always
successful, especially in the later times, and people have sought
to make despotism responsible for the corruptness of the
officials. The critics forget that the existence of a depotism
and the need of it presuppose a corrupt and undisciplined
people. If dishonesty and bribery took place in spite of all
Frederick II's precautions, that proves nothing in a country that
had been for thirty years without any ruler or any government.
This exacting service was no longer the quid pro quo of the
vassal in enjoyment of his fief (feudal duties and even direct
taxes rested on the officials' shoulders in addition) and the
salaries were extremely modest. Some other attraction than
gain must have been offered to these Sicilian officials to tempt
them to take service : the honour it may be of serving the
King ; the opportunity of exercising power ; the prospect of
fame and the special favour of the Emperor expressed in praise
and at times no doubt in rewards : above all the privilege of
belonging to the entourage of the Ruler : for the most part
immaterial benefits. And this in a country where the aristo
cracy was radically corrupt and the populace of unreliable
hybrid stock ! Frederick had first to awaken an appreciation
of such imponderable advantages and create the conditions
essential to every Service : official honour and official disci-
276 OFFICIAL HONOUR v.2
pline. It is remarkable how all the well-known phenomena of
bureaucracy suddenly make their appearance here though still
rooted in primitive conditions and sanctities. " Contempt of
court " was based on the theory that the official was the mirror
of the Emperor, consequently any insult to an official was an
insult to the Emperor and punishable as such. The general
theory held that any crime against a person in the Emperor's
employment — whether serving as soldier or official or in what
ever capacity — was to be twice as severely punished as the same
crime against a private individual. Underlying this was the
principle of Roman law, that an officer of the Emperor was
more worthy than a private person. The official was further
protected by the edict which affirmed : " It is sacrilege to
debate whether that man is worthy whom the Emperor has
chosen." An intangible something was incorporate in the
official, with which he was endowed by the Emperor.
This carried the converse obligation on the officials* side to
protect his special endowment by worthy behaviour. No
gambler might hold office. No one might permit another to
officiate for him : the penalty for both was death. The pro
tection of the official against injury was only extended to him
by the Emperor while he was in discharge of his duties, it was
not valid in private quarrels. On the other hand if an official
" under cloak of his office commits injustice " he is to be driven
from it cum perpetud infamid, because he has placed the Em
peror's person in a false light in order to mask his own wrong
doing. The idea of perpetua infamia was borrowed from
Roman Law : it was the regular Roman penalty for unfaithful
ness in office and carried with it confiscation of property.
Here official honour is clearly outlined. Each official is in
structed by the Emperor in the duties of his office.
" The justiciar's name and title are compounded oijus and
Justitia^ and the closer the justiciar's relation to these the more
truly and zealously he will honour them." Similarly with
respect to the highest officer of all, the Grand Master Justiciar :
let him be the " mirror of Justice " and let him be not merely
in name the Master of the other justiciars, but also their model
JUSTICIARS' TASKS 277
" that the lower ranks may see in him what standards they
should themselves observe." Here is a hint of the importance
of official precedence which is expounded elsewhere in terms
of the stars : " To preserve the special honour due to our High
Court we have commanded : c when at any time the Grand
Master Justiciar visits any town there to sit with our Court
Judges, the justiciars of the provinces who may happen at the
same time to be there, shall maintain silence as the lesser light
is dimmed when it is overtaken by the greater.' " This was
indeed a new departure and the commentator remarks of this
law that it offends against common law, because a lower officer
is by no means bound to silence by the presence of a higher.
The justiciars, as the King's commissioners and plenipoten
tiaries, and indeed his viceroys, in the provinces, united not
only the administrative and judicial functions, but also the
military : they had to summon the feudal knights, to recruit
the mercenary knights, and in Frederick IFs last decade when a
permanent state of siege had resulted from the great war, they
were army commanders in their own province. It is no cause
for surprise that these branches of the service were not differen
tiated ; that the justiciars even on occasion led troops to battle.
Apart from the fact that in those days there was no recognised
" art of war," provincial governors must always be in supreme
command. It was so in ancient Rome and with Napoleon's
Marshals, and is always found where State discipline is highly
developed. The merum imperium> power to command, cannot
be separated from the gladn potestas, the executive power, or
can only so be separated in peaceful bourgeois times.
The justiciars had also to exercise the highest powers of
police. Their police subordinates were presumably the
comestabuU. Special attention to political police, such as
Frederick displayed, is a phenomenon observable under every
dictatorship. The detective service was, of course, developed
to the minutest detail, so that even when Frederick was far from
Sicily on a campaign, he was often better informed about events
in the provinces than the justiciars themselves. He required
the aura of omniscience as urgently as that of omnipresence.
In order to keep political suspects under constant state sur
veillance, the Emperor introduced a unique system which had
278 PROFESSIONAL LAWYERS v. 2
the merit of publicity, but for that very reason was unques
tionably far more cruel than the most suspicious secret sur
veillance. Every person on whom suspicion fell — of intrigues
with the Roman curia, with exiles, with heretics, or with rebels
— received from the authorities, a small notebook in which the
details of the accusation were entered, and also the name of the
denouncer. This procedure no doubt simplified the super
vision of suspects, the accused was left in the dark about
nothing ; but we can well believe the chronicler who tells us
that this publicity led to acute discord and mutual hate between
accuser and accused.
As regards legal matters, the justiciars represented the royal
jurisdiction and were presidents of the law courts. There was
no room left for feudal courts — except for a few insignificant
survivals. Now though the justiciars must frequently have
acquired considerable legal knowledge, it was rare that they
were jurists by education — any more than a military governor
to be the highest legal authority, needs to be a professional
lawyer. They were empowered to maintain order and preside
in the courts. Legal experts, professional lawyers, were asso
ciated with them who formed the curia of the justiciar, the real
law court. There thus existed a second service side by side
with the justiciar service, composed of a very large number of
judges and counsel, as well as notaries and chancery clerks.
In this the lower courts were small-scale models of the High
Court. The Emperor himself was always surrounded by a
large number of law scholars who acted as his permanent
chancellors, his constiiarU and were employed in all kinds of
State work : professional lawyers instead of feudal retainers !
The Grand Master Justiciar as President of the High Court
had four High Court judges assigned to him, the Master
Justiciars had two judges, each justiciar had one judge. Other
assistant judges were to be found wherever there was a court,
since every town had three town judges and six notaries : big
towns like Messina, Naples, Capua had more. Notaries existed
in great numbers down to the humblest posts in the depart
ments of finance, army, fortifications, domains, forestry and
harbours, and had to perform all the clerical work of an ad
ministration entirely based on written documents. Each
AN UNWORTHY JUDGE 279
official had to keep a considerable number of account books,
registers, diaries, many of them in duplicate, for they had to
be submitted at stated intervals for examination by the later-
instituted Chief Auditor's Department. Every judgment had
to be recorded in clear legible handwriting, not in signs or
symbols of any special script which were most explicitly for
bidden. As the judgments were filed, only parchment was
used for them, though paper was permitted for everyday
vouchers.
There were corresponding ranks and degrees in the legal
profession, from the High Court Judges and Counsellors of the
King down to the humblest local judges, but all were appointed
and sworn in directly by the Emperor or his representative.
No one might independently set up as a judge, notary or
advocate. The judges had to be men of culture and education,
and the Emperor kept careful watch that no unsuitable person
was entrusted with the post of judge.
Lists of personnel were kept in every department, and the
Emperor kept himself informed at all times of the personalities
of his staffs and could usually avoid unfortunate appointments.
He wrote to Sicily, for instance, from his camp before Lodi :
" To Thomas of Montenero
Justiciar of the Principato and of Benevento —
An amazing rumour has recently reached our illustrious ears
which makes a severe accusation of slackness against you and
justly challenges our attention. We learn namely that our last
edict about the appointment of the annual judges has not borne
fruit in our town of Salerno, where thou hast permitted the
appointment of one, Matthew Curialis, as judge, who is an
illiterate merchant and wholly unsuited to the position. And
this though amongst the population of such a town which
chiefly produces cultured people there must assuredly be, we
are certain, an educated man to be found to exercise the office.
This displeases us all the more because firstly mischief to the
town may arise therefrom, and further our command has not
been obeyed as it was fitting that it should be. As we do not
280 REBELLIOUS TOWNS v.2
wish that the legal affairs of our faithful subjects should be
bought and sold for a price by any of thy merchants, whose
fingers are deft for money making, we hereby command thee
to remove the above named Matthew from his office and to
instal in his place another man competent, trusty, sufficiently
educated. . . ."
In the whole Sicilian State, there was no department of life
in which the Government did not directly intervene to establish
order. Minor authorities lost all their independence, not only
the feudal ranks but the towns and — after the second breach
with the Pope — also the churches and monasteries. The head
men of the towns were appointed annually by the Emperor,
and since Frederick II had a hard fight against the indepen
dence of the Lombard towns, it was most natural that he
strictly forbade the Sicilian towns to appoint their own heads :
the penalty was the destruction of the offending town. He did
not hesitate to give effect to this law, as he shortly proved. A
year after the publication of the Constitutions some Sicilian
towns rebelled ; the Emperor suppressed the rebellion with
the utmost rigour. The ringleaders whom he captured — hav
ing promised them immunity — were hanged or burned as
heretic rebels. This took place in Messina, Syracuse, and
Nicosia, while the smaller towns which had taken part in the
insurrection, Centorbi, Traina, Capizzi, and Monte Albona,
were completely destroyed. The inhabitants were reduced to
slavery and deported to a newly-founded town, which the
Emperor called Augusta, for the site of which rebellious
Syracuse was compelled to cede some of her territory. This
method was so successful that during the lifetime of Kaiser
Frederick the Sicilian towns made no second attempt to
achieve municipal independence.
The entire kingdom was to be uniformly administered by
imperial officials. The necessity for this ruthless clearing up
can only be appreciated by the student who bears in mind the
usual type of government prevailing in the Middle Ages : the
confused tangle of legal and economic relations ; the innumer
able petty and pettiest authorities ; feudal lords, bishops,
A PATTERN STATE 281
monasteries, towns whose rights and claims endlessly criss
crossed each other and in every department of life cut in
between the ruler and his people, and who remembers further
the kaleidoscopic welter of privileges, immunities, special rights
peculiar to each grade of society, to each calling, to each town,
to each hamlet, causing obstruction and hesitation a thousand
fold on every side.
The measures by which Frederick II extended one unified
system of administration throughout his whole kingdom, ulti
mately throughout the whole of Italy, making Sicily in very
trjith, the " pattern of states," were often cruel enough, but
they brought in their train a most admirable simplification of
the whole machinery of government. His influence on the
legal situation was exerted externally. He embraced the whole
tangle in one uniform system of law, but he left unmolested the
private and civil rights of his subjects in their mutual relations.
He was supremely indifferent whether their private affairs
were to be decided according to Prankish, Lombard, Roman,
Jewish, or Saracen codes, provided these did not run counter
to the state laws.
This imperial administration was the first that had ever
achieved umforrmtas over an area so large, hitherto it had been
possible only in the tiniest territories. The geographical con
formation of his hereditary kingdom was a factor highly favour
able to Frederick. Nature had provided the kingdom with a
defined outline, with only one land boundary which he had
strengthened by every known device. He had got possession
of almost all border fortresses — often by very shady means.
A certain abbot, for instance, owned a fort ; he was hospitably
invited and then detained while his castle was annexed.
Frederick next founded several towns himself in the North,
Flagella for instance, and Aquila, which he equipped as arsenals.
The method of foundation was simplicity itself: a certain
piece of land was marked out ; the scattered inhabitants of this
area were gathered into the new arsenal, they were released
from all obligations to their previous lords, and in return
for their freedom were compelled to work on building the
fortifications.
The fortified zone of the northern land boundary prevented
282 MUNICIPAL TECHNIQUE v.2
egress as effectively as ingress. All boundaries of the kingdom
could now be watched. Thanks to an ingenious and skilful
harbour administration, Frederick was able to bolt and bar all
the ports of Sicily, so that all communication — economic,
political or intellectual — with the outer world could at will be
completely cut off. The Emperor controlled, as it were, a
gigantic dam, or a castle with a hundred well-guarded gates,
and could regulate all external relations. With a word he
could transform the whole kingdom into a fortress, or econo
mically into one " closed trading centre." Sicily thus approxi
mated to a walled-in medieval town, and Frederick II Js much
admired economic policy is most easily understood if it is
conceived as a medieval town-administration extended to a
whole kingdom. The Italian communes had been before
Frederick, in fiscal matters, monopolies, currency and finance,
and in many administrative details too : the yearly tenure of
office, the justiciar'a stranger in his own district, the initiation
of the successor by his predecessor in office ; all these things
they had introduced in various forms. It must, moreover, be
remembered that the communes had long since ceased to be
simple towns surrounded by a wall. Cities like Milan,
Cremona, Piacenza, Ravenna, embraced landed property as
large as a dukedom. The Lombard cities taught Frederick
much of his municipal technique, as in other spheres the Church
had taught him. He learned eagerly, not least eagerly from
his foes.
We need here only dwell on the principles underlying the
Sicilian constitution. Its prime characteristic is the over
riding of all private interests by the interest of the State. The
Emperor's phrase : " Sicily is the mother of tyrants " recalls
the history of Dionysius of Syracuse, whose procedure in* his
day evoked not less amazement than Frederick IPs. The
complete fiscal independence of the one was as great as that of
the other, and the principle of centralisation grew more and
more marked hi the course of Frederick's reign. One of the
first measures to attract attention was the Emperor's creation
in 1231 of State Monopolies. Norman and Byzantine pre-
CUSTOMS SYSTEM 283
cedents may have had weight with him, but the idea was not
foreign to his own policy of utilising to the utmost all crown
rights and royal prerogatives. A monopoly of salt, steel, and
iron is readily deducible from royal mountain-rights. Hemp
and tar monopolies had no doubt some other pretext — the
needs of the imperial fleet were here decisive. The right of
dyeing was of old a crown prerogative and was now converted
into a monopoly ; only the silk monopoly is a clear case of
borrowing from Byzantine models. The working of the mono
poly is most clearly seen in the case of salt — which remains a
state monopoly to this day. Some of the salt mines were
under state management, some were in the hands of private
people who had to deliver the salt to the revenue department.
On a certain day the entire trade in salt was transferred to the
State. In every centre suitable people were entrusted with the
selling of it, a uniform price was fixed for the whole kingdom :
wholesale four times, retail six times the purchase price. The
same method was applied to iron and steel, while the silk and
dye monopolies were handed over to the Jews. The manu
facture of silk had originally been a prerogative of the Byzantine
emperors ; King Roger having taken a number of silk weavers
prisoners — among them many Jews — in Thebes, Corinth, and
Athens, brought them to Palermo and introduced it into Sicily.
Here the royal " tirdz " (silk manufacture) won world- wide
fame. Frederick entrusted the trade in raw silk to the Jews
of Trani. No one else was allowed to purchase silk, and they
were obliged to make a profit of at least one-third on the re-sale,
for that was the tax they had to pay the exchequer. The manu
facture of the silk was also in their hands, and the existing state
dyeworks, together with many new ones which Frederick built,
were handed over to them.
In the domain of economics, Frederick's greatest organising
triumph was his magnificent customs system. The name of
his customs officials, " daana," points to the Arab origin (diwari)
of the system. The state warehouses, " fondachi," which were
particularly important for the levy of frontier customs were also
of Arab origin. Frederick had reduced to a minimum internal
customs and tolls, which only benefited individual nobles or
towns, and in their stead had increased the frontier customs
284 STATE WAREHOUSES v.z
and manipulated them in a way that created a standard for the
whole western world. The customs revenues no longer en
riched the insignificant middleman, the seaport or trading town ;
they flowed into the coffers of the State. In all seaports and
on all highroads of the northern frontier, Frederick II estab
lished state warehouses. Everyone, whether native or foreign,
who wanted to import goods by sea or land into this closed
kingdom, had to store them in the State magazine, where they
were sold under the supervision of imperial officials.
The import duty which, apart from some special trade con
tracts with foreign powers, amounted to 3 per cent, of the
value, fell on the seller, the slightly higher warehouse fee on
the buyer. When customs duty and storage fees had once been
paid the goods could, on production of the voucher, be trans
ferred by sea or land to any other place in Sicily without
further payment.
The export procedure was similar. The warehouse charges
were the same, but the export duty varied for the different
products and the tariff sometimes fluctuated. For exports were
regulated according to the needs of the country itself and in
war time all export of weapons, horses, mules, and cattle might
be forbidden.
Warehouses, which also served as inns for the merchants,
had long been traditional in the East. Venetians, Pisans,
Genoese, and later Florentines also had all, for instance, their
avmfondacki in Alexandria. Before Frederick's day these were
common in all Italian seaports ; the famous Fondaco dei
Tedeschi in the Rialto was first recorded in a document of 1228 .
In inland Italy they were still almost unknown at the end of
the thirteenth century. It almost seems as if these fondachi
reappeared in the merchants3 quarters of the German Hansa,
which began to spread in the second half of the century in
close connection with the Order of Teutonic Knights. At first
these warehouses were the private property of foreign traders.
Frederick made them state property throughout the kingdom,
and compelled all merchants to use the state magazines by
forbidding all sale of goods outside them. The merchants,
moreover, were practically compelled to put up in these state
inns, for the charge for bed, light and fuel, was included in the
FAIRS 285
heavy warehouse fee, When this system was first introduced,
the existing warehouses were insufficient and the merchants had
to seek lodgings elsewhere. They were nevertheless compelled
to pay the full fee, and their lodging bill was paid by the State.
The system had the advantage of permitting the supervision of
all imports and exports. Everything was exactly registered and
had to be accounted for at regular intervals, the lower officials
reporting to the provincial treasurer and he to the Court of
Exchequer. Several copies of all customs- ledgers and ware
house-ledgers had to be kept. The customs officer, the
magister doanae, was a different person from the warehouse
master, the fundicariusy and so one constituted a check on the
other. Further, all wares had to be weighed on the state
balances at a considerable fee, or measured, in the case of cloth,
etc., by the state measure. After anchor dues, landing dues,
and harbour dues there were many other minor fees to pay.
The exchange, the baths, the slaughter-houses, the weights
and measures, all belonged to the State. As Frederick had
unified the coinage by his golden Augustales, he also established
units of weight and measure, thus bringing order out of con
fusion. His aim in everything was simplification and practical
convenience, as is obvious from his new regulation of markets
and fairs. He decided to get rid of the distraction, over
lapping and confusion, created by the clashing of dates and
the like. Fairs were held each month in a different province.
They began in the Abruzzi in the north ; they proceeded to
Campania, the Principato, the Capitanata, Apulia, lie Basilicata,
they ended in Calabria. No fairs were held for a couple of
months in the winter, during which time the merchants could
replenish their stocks and travel north again to begin the year's
circuit once more in the Spring.
The rigorous customs system admitted practically no privi
leges or exceptions ; only the Emperor himself and the Revenue
Department were exempt. This had most practical importance
in relation to the export of food stuffs, of which Sicily produced
a superfluity. The Emperor was not only free from export
duties, he was also the largest landed proprietor in the kingdom,
286 CORN MONOPOLY v.2
and consequently the greatest corn producer. He had first the
Crown lands, farmed by himself, which were frequently
organised by Cistercian monks, who no doubt also worked them,
the final supervision only being in the hands of imperial pro
curators. In less fertile districts sheep-farming was extensively
carried on. The harvests both of wool and corn under this
skilled administration must have yielded immense profits. The
Emperor was himself an agricultural expert. He once amazed
the Italians in Lombardy by investigating the type of soil and
then advising them whether to sow corn or beans or some other
crop. He tried every sort of experiment with new crops : he
made plantations of henna and indigo, improved date groves,
or encouraged the use of sugar cane in Palermo by establishing
sugar refineries. He gave instructions for the prevention of
pests. When a plague of caterpillars threatened the harvest
he gave orders that every inhabitant should furnish daily a
certain measure of caterpillars. He had more faith in this
method, he said, than in the efficacy of the prayers of the priests
as they perambulated the stricken fields. He admitted that
harvests might suffer from the weather, but he saw the major
danger in the laziness of the population. He therefore gave
orders that any landless person who was willing to work should
be given land at the expense of any who had land lying idle.
Such measures must greatly have increased the productive
ness of his own estates, but he did not draw corn solely from
his crown lands. He also received a twelfth of the products
of the Demanium and a tax in kind on all corn destined for
export was paid to the Treasury unless a money payment was
made instead. No private person could compete with the
quantity of State corn, especially as the Crown with its immense
money resources could buy up private supplies. And the
Emperor was not only able to export his corn free of tax, but
to load it up on his own ships of the imperial fleet. Hence
arose a virtual, though veiled, monopoly in corn, for the State
possessed every means of crippling competition. One example
may be quoted to show how Frederick exploited these possi
bilities. He was waging war in Northern Italy when the news
came that there was a famine in Tunis and that Genoese
merchants were buying corn with Tunisian money in the
AN IMPERIAL DEAL 287
Sicilian ports. The Emperor forthwith despatched his Arabic-
speaking court philosopher, Master Theodore, from Pisa, as
ambassador to Tunis, and at the same time gave orders to close
all Sicilian ports, to let no private vessel sail, and to load with
the utmost haste 50,000 loads of corn on the imperial fleet.
The corn was to come from the imperial granaries or to be
bought from private owners and immediately shipped to Tunis.
Not till after the imperial fleet had sailed wras any private boat
free to proceed with her lading and quit Sicilian harbours.
The imperial fleet reached Africa safely. The State made
about ^75,000. The record of this transaction happens to
have come down to us.
Such dealings as these recall the mercantile theories of
Colbert, but there lies a world of difference between the calm,
state-rationalism of the later capitalistic centuries, and the
passionate adventures of the Hohenstaufen, whose measures
were always the immediate product of some actual State
necessity. In this matter of the Tunisian corn, the Emperor
had at first refused to interfere ; but his coffers were empty,
he was himself deeply in debt to the Romans and his war with
the Pope was at its height ; so he had no option but to seize
the opportunity.
Frederick's collection of direct revenue was always by extra
ordinary taxes. Though in later years he raised them annually,
they were always explained afresh as due to the present imminens
necessitas of the State. Imperial finance operations were always
dictated by a present need, they never served for the mere
accumulation of wealth. The moment his position improved,
the Emperor reduced the taxes or pretermitted the collection
of them altogether. Frederick had no lack of shrewd com
mercial instinct, but he did not use it systematically to amass
riches.
The Emperor busied himself in these years in opening foreign
markets by means of commercial treaties. We have already
noticed the commercial link with Tunis. Abu Zakaria Yahya,
hitherto the representative of the Sultan of the Almohades,
established a kingdom of his own in 1228 which embraced
288 TRADE v.2
Tunis, Tripoli and a part of Morocco, and founded the dynasty
of the Hafsids. Three years later, in 1231, Frederick II con
cluded a commercial treaty with Abu Zakaria for ten years,
which fixed their reciprocal customs duties at 10 per cent, and
guaranteed protection to each other's merchants. Following
the precedent set by the sea towns, the Emperor appointed his
own Sicilian consuls for Tunis : this was the first time in
history that a Western monarchy maintained a permanent
representative overseas. The first imperial consul in Tunis
was a Saracen, Henricus Abbas, after him a Christian, Peter
Capuanus from Amalfi. Embassies to Tunis were frequent.
Each side endeavoured to gratify the other, and the Emperor
drew supplies for himself from Tunis, not only of Barbary
horses, hunting leopards and baggage camels, but also at times
of Tunisian warriors to supplement his Saracen body-guard.
In return the imperial ships undertook, on occasion, to carry
Tunisian envoys to Spain. Sicilian officials were sent as the
Emperor's messengers to the Khalif of Granada, the " Com
mander of the Faithful." No doubt Muhammadan Spain
proved at times a valuable market for Sicilian corn.
While still in Syria, Frederick had concluded a commercial
agreement with his friend al Kamil, Sultan of Egypt. He did
not succeed in negotiating complete freedom from customs dues
for Sicilian merchants in the harbours of Alexandria and
Rosetta — which he appears to have aimed at — but trade with
Egypt remained vigorous. An imperial ship, the " Half
World," aroused the greatest excitement amongst the Egyptians
by its enormous size when it sailed into the port of Alexandria
with a crew of three hundred men. It is said that Frederick II
stood in direct communication with India through his agents
travelling by way of Egypt. We have no means of verifying the
assertion, but it transpires in another connection that Frederick
was extremely well-informed about India. The fascination
which the word East Indies was later to exercise on the explorers
is here foreshadowed. It was only a few decades after the end
of the Hohenstaufen period that Marco Polo heralded the joyous
age of discovery which shattered to fragments the Roman-Medi
terranean world.
Meanwhile the revenue department of Sicily fulfilled its
FINANCE 289
purpose. Whatever was to be extracted from the rich country
was appropriated by the imperial official. Before the outbreak
of the great war, Frederick II was reckoned the wealthiest
monarch of Europe since the days of Charlemagne. The
Emperor's principle was well understood : Germany's business
was to keep him supplied with fighters and Sicily's to find the
funds. The war was being waged against the financially most
prosperous powers of the known world : the Church and the
Italian towns. It has been the fashion to admire Frederick's
economic system, but at the same time to reproach him with
having been guilty of exploitation by unduly increasing his
demands during the war years. But every ruler of Frederick's
stature has exploited the resources of the world, and the
Sicilian kingdom, which, in return, enjoyed uninterrupted
peace, could not expect to be immune. Without such ex
ploitation — to the very limit of exhaustion — nothing really
great has ever been accomplished. Consider France during,
and after, the Napoleonic Wars.
Frederick II's new constitution, opening with the imperial
Prooemium, had gently descended from the sublimest spiritual
heights and settled on the land of Sicily, seizing the country in
its iron grasp. Uniform administration, uniform law, uni
form finance : the constitution of the State was complete.
The way was paved for the Sicilians to feel themselves one
unified people, to realise their cohesion as a nation ; but the
goal was not yet reached. Except in a very few points the laws
scarcely touched the elementary unities which make the in
habitants of a country feel themselves one and bind them into
a nation : the essentials are : community of speech, of blood,
of history and of festivals. These common elements were
lacking in the Sicilian welter of peoples more than in most
other countries. Happily for the Emperor, the other countries
of Europe had scarcely yet begun to be conscious of the exis
tence of these natural ties. For centuries it had been the
Church's aim to stifle these natural forces, to displace folk-
customs by the rites of the Church, local history by Holy
Scripture, native festivals by the Church's feasts, while for
290 A NEW NATION v.a
every intellectual utterance the sacred Latin was preferred to
the vernacular, and the blood of the race was of less account
than the Blood of the Redeemer. The awakening of national
consciousness in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries was the
emancipation of the people's natural instincts from the spiritual
bonds of the Church.
Frederick II in his capacity as Emperor dared not sever the
ecclesiastical fetters that held the people in bondage, for the
Church was the guarantor of his position and of the existence
of the Roman Empire. On the other hand, he awakened and
stimulated the " national " impulses more than anyone before
him, and in Sicily he not only called out latent forces and feel
ings, but set about creating them in his chosen people and
welding that people into a nation.
With his coining a new epoch began for Sicily. Frederick
continually emphasised the fact : again and again in his Book
of Laws he calls himself (with deliberate intent) " the New
King." With him the Sicilian race-mixture begins to be a
people with a history of its own. In a remarkable document
of this time Frederick summarises the History of Sicily for
his faithful subjects and conjures up the past, with the present
intention of making the Sicilians conscious of their common
history. Under the Greeks and Romans, Sicily had suffered
great injustice, because the country was divided up and rent
asunder. The Normans were the first to create a unity :
" Since when this noble country . . . under the firm and heroic
settlement of our ancestors rose to be called a KINGDOM and
the inhabitants learned to love their kingdom and their throne
of royal dignity." The zenith of Sicilian history came when
" Divine Providence, in its wisdom, granted in our day this
great happiness to your king, whom you had nourished with
the milk of your love and weaned at your breast, that he should
scale the heights of the Roman Empire." They were now
living under the rule of the Sicilian Hohenstaufen, " this off
shoot of a new stem," who had grown up amongst the native
born of the kingdom. . . . The valour of the Sicilians would
grow ever greater under their Emperor, " for already in the
early days of that heroic age our ancestors' noble plantations
bore ample fruit." In such terms the Emperor spurred on his
MIXED MARRIAGES 291
faithful to fight against the Lombard faithlessness : they should
follow the example of their ancestors who conquered distant
peoples and " feared not to face the dangers of the sea nor the
buffetings of fate on land."
Such appeals presupposed a people for the Emperor to
address, a people on whom such words would act. The
Normans had certainly made the first " firm settlement," but
Guiscard's successors could not have spoken in such terms to
the mixture of Arabs, Greeks, Latins and Jews, nor by such
words have hoped to fire any but the few noble Norman kins
men who were round them. Frederick treated the Sicilians
as a nation with its own glorious history, and he was the first
to attempt to point the Sicilians to their common traditions,
to address to them a common appeal. He was able to do so
because he was no usurper, but " an off-shoot from the new
Sicilian planting," who felt a bond with the new people amongst
whom he had grown to manhood, a community of race be
tween the ruler and the ruled, which had hitherto been lacking.
The Emperor's allusions to race and nurture were no accident.
We quote another pronouncement
The Emperor had once explained the sacrament of marriage
as a natural necessity for the maintenance of the human race.
Not every marriage, however, was calculated to secure the
" better nature " of mankind. The Emperor therefore pub
lished a law which paid more heed to breed than to sacramental
considerations, so that a commentator, long after, was moved
to indignation, remarking " this discloses the whole spiritual
degeneracy of this Emperor Frederick who would hinder the
just and free marriage instituted by God in Paradise. Such a
a law is not binding before the judgment-seat of God."
Frederick II had forbidden, on pain of confiscation of property,
any Sicilian man or maid to contract a marriage with a foreigner
(that is anyone born outside Sicily) without special permission
from the Emperor. He explains the reasons with profound
wisdom : " It has often grieved us to see how the righteousness
of our kingdom has suffered corruption from foreign manners
by the mixture of different peoples. When the men of Sicily
aUy themselves with the daughters of foreigners, the purity of
the race becomes besmirched, while evil and sensual weakness
292 SICILIAN VESPERS v.2
increases, the purity of the people is contaminated by the speech
and by the habits of the others, and the seed of the stranger
defiles the hearth of our faithful subjects." Hence, as a remedy
against " degeneracy of race," against " racial confusion in the
kingdom," the law forbids marriage with foreigners.
Nothing could demonstrate more clearly than this law the
intention of the Emperor to create, even from the racial stand
point, a unified nation out of the Sicilian people. It was a
measure which, aiming with wholesome severity at something
higher, frankly ran counter to every custom of the Church and
was always felt as a monstrosity, as the commentator shows.
Though the same writer adds, not without admiration, " This
Emperor, however, strove most diligently to preserve his people
pure from corruption by the customs and conversation of
strangers." Everything in this stern State aimed at unity, not
only in theory but in practice, based on the necessitas rerum.
For unity was of God and multiplicity was of the Devil.
History proves that Frederick II achieved his aim, and
succeeded in awakening amongst the Sicilians respect for the
dignity of their own race. Some sixty years after the death of
their only Emperor the Sicilians rose (the most mongrel popu
lation of Palermo first of all) against the Anjous at the Vespers
and slaughtered the French garrison in an unexampled mas
sacre. They fought under tie unfurled eagles with the cry
" Death to the Gauls I ", and when they found Sicilian women
pregnant by the French they ripped open their wombs with
the sword to trample under foot the foreign brood.
The history of Frederick II demonstrates how much a law
giver can accomplish by force and compulsion, so long as he
knows what his aims are, and so long as those aims are just.
Nevertheless, certain limits are set to the direct spiritual in
fluence of a ruler on the masses of his people, and his wishes,
thoughts and opinions are for the most part handed on with
necessary and inevitable dilution through intermediaries, those
intimates who stand under the ruler's personal influence, the
court, the entourage, the hierarchy of imperial employees. A
picture of the Emperor himself can best be formed by studying
his human influence on those most closely associated with him.
THE LEGAL SPIRIT 293
III
From the Intellectual point of view Frederick's new secular
State was a triumph of that lay culture which, for the last
century, had been spreading in wider and wider circles.
This was the first time that profane learning had been con
centrated and organised. The pillars of the state were now
educated laymen, no longer clerics, and it is only natural that
the Founder of the State was himself the most highly cultured
layman of them all. By his organisation of the emancipated
" secular " spirit Frederick II broke once and for all the spell
which the Church had laid on the whole domain of the non-
material as an intellectual and spiritual unity. Even more
clearly than by the state philosophy, the complete mental
independence of the new State was demonstrated by the fact
that the clergy ceased to play a part in the administration of
Sicily, and their spiritual influence on it gradually ceased.
The Sicilian state itself is the proof that lay education had
made great strides in Frederick's century, for the Emperor
was able to risk basing his whole new kingdom on it. On the
other hand the existing supply of educated laymen was not
sufficient, and in order to be able to draw on larger numbers
Frederick founded the University of Naples. In the Charter
of the University Frederick stated : *' We propose to rear
many clever and clearsighted men, by the draught of knowledge
and the seed of learning ; men made eloquent by study and
by the observation of just law, who will serve the God of all
and will please us by the cult of Justice. . « . We invite
learned men to our service, men full of zeal for the study of
Jus and Justitia^ to whom we can entrust our administration
without fear." The Emperor thus made clear what spirit was
to govern his state — the legal spirit. This need not surprise us.
For, since Justice was the Emperor's mediator with God the
same must apply to his followers and servants.
The whole state was thick-sown with lawyers. Ousting
the clergy, hitherto the only representatives of education and
culture, the jurists now had the entry to the Emperor's court,
and the replacing of a clerical atmosphere by an emancipated
294 THE PROFESSIONAL LAWYER v. 3
secular atmosphere was pregnant with momentous change even
in the highest politics. The Church had long been striving
to enlist to her side the newly-awakened town-dweller. Frede
rick II now entered the lists, and while the Church, with the
support of the mendicant orders, was successful in capturing
the masses the Emperor won over the educated classes, the
new intellectual aristocracy. These were usually inclined to
support the Government. It was, therefore, of the greatest
importance that Frederick II, recognising their vigour and their
potentialities, enlisted the town lawyers in his service, gave
them the widest possible scope, in administration, in his
chancery work, and in his court circles, and by this means
within a few years revolutionised the whole central government
of Sicily and even of the Empire. The two administrations of
Sicily and of the Empire were originally to be kept apart, in
accordance with the agreement with Rome, but they were
afterwards amalgamated.
The University of Naples was to rear professional jurists,
judges, and notaries with legal training. Hard and fast
" careers " were unknown in Frederick's state, as was any
systematic promotion by seniority which the one-year tenure
of office made impossible. The factors making for success
were the personal qualities of the individual, an opportunity
of distinguishing himself, and luck in happening to attract
the attention of the Emperor and the court. The number of
officials was relatively small, and it was possible to keep them
all under observation. It was probably rare for a really able
man to be passed over, for the Emperor was quick to seize
a suitable man for a given post, whether a precedent was thereby
followed or created. Certain general tendencies can, however,
be traced : the judge's career, for instance, was usually distinct
from the notary's, though occasional interchanges took place.
Having completed his studies at the University of Naples
(we have no clue to the length of the course ; in Northern
Italy three to six years was prescribed) the new judge was
selected by some town to act as town-judge. On this the
candidate betook himself to court with a certificate, to receive
his appointment from the Emperor or his representative, to
take the oath and, if necessary, to be tested by the High Court
THE LEGAL CAREER 295
in his literary and legal attainments. In this way the Emperor
and the Court Judges kept in touch with the rising generation
of lawyers, except so far as during the Emperor's absence
appointments were made by his provincial representatives, the
justiciars. The young judge next had an opportunity of
entering the narrower State service asjudex to one of the justi
ciars, or, later, in Northern Italy, to one of the numerous
vicars, vicars general or podestas. With good fortune he might
ultimately reach the office of High Court Judge. This was not
the only avenue to the High Court bench, for we know of High
Court Judges who had never officiated as ordinary judges : the
famous Thaddeus of Suessa, for example, a courtier and one of
Frederick's intimates. It is worth noting that quite a number
held the title of High Court Judge without having officiated at
all. These were the consitiarii, the counsellors who were
employed in the imperial Chancery and on diplomatic missions
and formed part of the Emperor's immediate following.
This is the first time that professional lawyers figure in
the permanent personnel of an Emperor's court, not merely as
occasional experts. The judges of lower degree could find
many niches for themselves in the service ; we find them as
chamberlains, as tax collectors, as overseers of the accounts
departments, as keepers of the King's treasury and in other
capacities ; in offices which might perfectly well have been
filled by non-legal nobles or burgesses. It is important to note
how the lawyers were thrusting into posts of every sort.
The second important group of educated lawyers were the
notaries. They had to pursue a course of study, and probably
to win the degree of master, before seeking further training as
registrar of some chancery. After examination by the High
Court the notary received the imperial nomination and
appointment. For a notary as for a judge service at court was
the desirable goal. A man might begin at the court of a
provincial justiciar or in some branch of the finance depart
ment, and then get an opening at court and become Court
Notary at the High Court, or President of some section of the
imperial Chancery : Current Business or Feudal Affairs, for
instance. As a general rule the supply of court notaries and
chancery clerks was supplemented in other ways with which we
296 BISHOPS AS BUREAUCRATS v.3
shall deal later. The state, as we have already seen, was full of
notaries who had to deal with the ever increasing mass of
written documents which gave the administration so modern an
air. The immense number of orders issued by the Court, most
of them required in several copies, demanded in every grade
of the services a highly skilled staff of clerks not subject to
annual displacement. Other departments, notably Finance,
also required the services of notaries.
This penetration of the secular state by the legal spirit was
only a reflection of what had already taken place within the
bosom of the Church. A knowledge of Canon Law was
indispensable for every cleric of any position. The carefully
cultivated style of the notaries was also originally a product of
the Church. It followed that a course of study at Naples and
employment in the imperial Chancery might be the opening
of a clerical career. There was the possibility of Church pro
motion for anyone who had mastered both laws, and if this did
not offer the Chancery was a safe refuge. We have already
alluded to the Emperor's efforts to secure the appointment of
his notaries to vacant bishoprics. In the early days these
efforts always failed, but after the second excommunication
the Emperor flung aside all restraint and began to appoint
Sicilian bishops of his own choice, or allow Archbishop Berard
of Palermo to do so, except in cases where he preferred to keep
a vacancy. The Ottos and the Salians long ago in Germany
used to rear up their private chaplains to be their future bishops,
and the Chancery of the Imperial Court now served the same
purpose as of old the private chapel of the Emperor. The
radical innovation was that these clerical Chancery officials,
never very numerous, were appointed not because they were
clerics but because they were jurists, and in spite of their
being clerics. The Emperor found them in no way indis
pensable, and their priestly character was a matter of indiffer
ence to him, fraught with no danger. Walter of Ocra, notary
and chaplain of the Emperor, and one of his busiest officials,
rose to be Sicilian Chancellor, but he was on an entirely different
footing from the bishop-chancellors of earlier days : he was
simply an imperial official who happened to be a cleric. The
higher clergy were still represented at Court, especially by
UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA 297
prelates who were able to adapt themselves to the new spirit
of the times. The Archbishops Berard of Palermo, and Jacob
of Capua, belonged to the most intimate circle of the Emperor.
Frederick had utilised the latter as collaborator in the Constitu
tions of Melfi, especially in those sections which dealt with the
Church and the Sicilian clergy. A few other bishops were
intimate with the Emperor, Archbishop Berard of Messina
and Bishop Peter of Ravello. These prelates had weight in
the intellectual life of the court only in so far as they accom
modated themselves to the literary and mental pursuits
around them. They were no longer themselves the indepen
dent purveyors of spiritual life as bishops had been wont to be.
Still we must not undervalue the fact that the mental atmo
sphere of the Court was sufficiently catholic to give scope even
to canonistic culture. It was inevitable that the University of
Naples should have a number of clerical students, since all
Sicilian subjects were- compelled to attend it. One of the
greatest of all churchmen was a product of Naples : Thomas
Aquinas, the doctor angelicus of the Roman Church.
Two years after founding the University of Naples Frede
rick II had closed the University of Bologna on account of the
fiasco of the Cremona Diet in 1226. In so doing he had a
special intention of his own. He wrote to the professors as
well as to the scholars of Bologna : the last thing he wished
was that learned men should suffer through the recalcitrance
of the rebellious Bolognese who had joined the Lombard
League. He invited them, therefore, to quit Bologna and come
to Naples, " where instituted by us with much care, study
flourishes . . . the beauty of the neighbourhood attracts, no less
than the lavish supplies of everything, and the reverend com
munity of doctors." This great plan of transferring to Naples
the famous Law School of Bologna fell through. The Pope's
intervention secured a truce with the Lombard League, and
the Emperor had to retract his outlawry of Bologna and permit
the reopening of the University. The scholars of Bologna made
merry over the imperial University of Naples : this ambitious
home of all sciences was at best an embryo, and one not likely
to thrive. For it depended on the caprice of its founder, who
had no obligations and whose mood might easily change. The
298 SCHOLARS OF NAPLES v.3
Bolognese were not far wide of the mark. For better or worse
the fate of this suddenly- founded University was linked with
the fate of the Emperor and his State. When the Papal troops
invaded the kingdom all study ceased in Naples, though only
for a few years. In 1234 Frederick re-established the Uni
versity and attracted a really excellent teaching staff. At first
Roffredo of Benevento taught Civil Law ; the Canon Law
scholar, Bartholomew Pignatellus, the Decretals ; Master
Terrisius of Atina gave instruction in Arts ; a Catalonian,
Master Arnaldus, lectured on Aristotle's natural philosophy.
The grammarian, Walter of Ascoli, was secured, and com
pleted in Naples his great Etymological Encyclopaedia, begun
in Bologna. Finally, Peter of Ireland, the teacher of Thomas
Aquinas, whom his contemporaries called gemma magistrorum
et laurea morumt represented natural science.
Frederick IPs severe struggles with the Church compelled
certain retrenchments of study to be made at a later date, but
the university was never again dissolved. After its re-establish
ment in 1234 its administration was in the hands of a Justiciar
of Students, so that the University enjoyed a certain independ
ence, though it remained immediately connected with the High
Court and with the imperial Chancery. Students and pro
fessors were well aware who was the determining personality ;
when they begged, in 1234, for the opportunity of resuming
their studies, they did not appeal direct to the Emperor but to
the " Master," who was even then considered as " the ex
pounder of the sole truth for the ears of the Emperor/' the High
Court Judge, Piero della Vigna.
We know all too little about this famous scholar and writer,
who, like a second St. Peter, " held both keys to Frederick's
heart/' and who even in Dante's Hell, in the ghostly wood of
the Suicides, maintained that his fall was solely due to " envy's
cruel blow," that " harlot of courts." He is sometimes
supposed to represent a frequently recurrent type, so much so
that Conrad Ferdinand Meyer had no difficulty in painting
from him his picture of the English Thomas & Becket. Yet
Piero della Vigna is radically different, by his whole position,
PIERO DELLA VIGNA 299
and his human relation to his master, from Chancellors like
Cassiodorus or Reginald of Dassel. He was not the com
plementary brain of a warrior king, but an instrument which a
most intellectual Emperor had consciously fashioned for him-
himself : the spokesman and the mouthpiece of his master.
As Logothetes, " one who places words/' this greatest Latin
stylist of the Middle Ages was, both in writing and speaking,
the mouthpiece of imperial thought and act, the creator of the
imperial diction and the majestic utterance ; as jurist, probably
the author of all the Emperor's laws ; as scholar and humanist
of the first water, the counsellor and intimate, nay the friend of
the Emperor. He was quite indispensable to Frederick, this
master of expression, who had at his command the most
telling phrase for each phase of the versatile Emperor's activity,
who supplied the most convincing explanation of his master's
acts, and often in so doing helped to determine the next
step, whose duty it was to announce and make plausible
Frederick's constant changes of front. Frederick had raised
him up from nothing to the first position in the state, and made
him the confidant of all his schemes, and was finally compelled
to destroy him when the servant began, unaccountably, to
stumble. With another man, reproof or banishment would
have sufficed ; a blunder of della Vigna's merited extinction.
His was a life which Fate entangled in the tragedy of the
House of Hohenstaufen.
Legend ascribed the basest origin to Piero della Vigna, son
of an unknown father, and an abandoned mother, who miser
ably supported herself and her infant by beggary. He was, in
fact, of reputable family, his father probably a town judge in
Capua, where Piero was certainly born. The boy seems to
have gone to Bologna without the family approval, and to have
carried on his studies in canon law and civil law amid con
siderable hardships. At last he addressed a petition to Arch
bishop Berard of Palermo. It is a testimony to both that on
the strength of this one letter, so the story goes, Berard of
Palermo immediately commended the petitioner to the Empe
ror's attention. When Frederick returned in 1221 he installed
the young man as notary in his Chancery, and, recognising his
outstanding ability, speedily promoted him to be High Court
300 HIS STYLE . v.3
Judge, then Chief Notary of the Sicilian kingdom, till he finally
created for him the post of Logothetes, who should actually
speak for the Emperor in the High Court, as well as write for
him. As High Court Judge Piero della Vigna was one of the
legal Counsellors in the closest attendance on the Emperor.
In this capacity he formulated the whole body of Laws that
comprised the Constitutions of 1231. So amply did he play
" Tribonian to the Justinian of Sicily " that posterity inserted
his name at the end of the Liber Augustalis. Later, della
Vigna took over the sole direction of the imperial Chancery,
and his fame rested more especially on his stylistic accomplish
ment. His art, however, was rooted in human things, and his
facility of expression grew with the Emperor's growth. When
the Crusades had given the Emperor new horizons the mani
festos of the Capuan began to expand and to swell into a
rhythmic emotion which, year by year, surrounded the majesty
of Frederick II with more magnificent and more awe-inspiring
eloquence.
His Latin was an artificial language, highly perfected in form,
often difficult to understand, so that contemporaries complained
of his highest style as " intentionally obscure." Only by a
measure of obscurity was it possible, without sacrificing its
living vigour, to extort from Latin, for centuries traditionally
mishandled, the notes of height and depth required. When the
humanists a little later revivified the classical Latin of Cicero
they discovered — alas — a dead language, and brought it again to
birth. Piero della Vigna is the last creative writer of living
Latin. It was a living language that spoke with pomp and
pride and smooth-flowing magnificence from his obscure
periods. Its comprehensiveness and joy in style bore within
them the seeds of classic humanistic Latin. Delia Vigna's
speech, a Summa in its own domain, exhausted every possibility
of Latin-Christian linguistics in the realms of Church and
Empire.
For centuries to come, long after the Christian Roman
world that had begotten them was dead, his collected letters
lived on in the Chanceries of Europe as masterpieces of style,
and preserved the image of that Emperor who had imposed it
on his spokesman. How much in these letters is Piero della
HIS VERSATILITY 301
Vigna, and how much Frederick, will never be known, but the
composite result dictated the style of all the other imperial
secretaries. The Capuan's elaborate and emotional forms of
expression would have rung false and hollow without the living
reality that underlay them, without the wide circle of the
Roman Empire, and in the background the Emperor holding
the pen. King Manfred's letters in della Vigna's style disclose
a painful discrepancy.
The information we crave about Piero della Vigna's personal
and private life is not forthcoming, but his poems, letters and
manifestos betray him as one of those highly-cultured literati
whom humanism, awaking with Petrarch, later produced in
numbers. Piero della Vigna was the most eminent amongst the
few existing in the early thirteenth century. On the one hand
he was master of the old : the formalism of the time, canon
and civil law, scholastic and ancient philosophy, ancient authors
and church divines, rhetoric, versifying, letter-writing. On
the other hand he was zealous to face the new with an ele
mental fire and passion that flash from his writings. He was
ready to turn his hand to anything : scholar and judge, philo
sopher and artist, stylist, diplomat and courtier, ambassador
and go-between, even warrior when occasion demands, drawing
up the lines of battle, perhaps even taking part in the fight.
He wore himself out in service. He says himself that he
had grown very old — in contrast to the ever-youthful Emperor.
Little is known about his appearance. The so-called della
Vigna bust of the bridge gate at Capua cannot represent the
celebrated High Court Judge of Frederick II, but more likely
portrays a late classical philosopher. Nevertheless, the con
temporary identification of this bust with a judge of the
Hohenstaufen Court indicates that this human type, was not
unfamiliar amongst the law scholars of the Court ; a heavy,
serious, learned face it is, with supercilious, even mocking
expression ; vigorous and strong, however, and massive, with
the mighty beard which lends added dignity to the head — the
very antithesis of the picture we form of the Emperor himself.
Piero della Vigna's duties to the Naples University and to the
imperial Chancery and High Court were not confined to the
administration, but extended also to the personnel. For one
302 SCHOOL OF RHETORIC v. 3
thing, Court officials gave lectures at the University ; amongst
them the High Court Judge, Roffredo of Benevento, and later an
imperial Court Notary, Nicolas of Rocca, who started rhetorical
courses in Naples . The relation of the Chancery to the students
was even more important, for the budding jurist, especially
the young notary, received the groundwork of his training at
the University, but the final polish at the Emperor's court.
The literary education of the favoured few was more or less
directly in the hands of Piero della Vigna, in whose Chancery
they acquired the stilum supremum. Piero della Vigna was in
this the upholder of a tradition which lingered, not in the Court,
but in his native town of Capua. For the art of style, the ars
dictandi, had been so specially cultivated in this town that one
may fairly talk of a Capuan School, the peculiar character of
which was its direct reversion to late classical prose. Piero
della Vigna very possibly learnt his own skill in Capua, whereas
the stylists of preceding generations had adopted the famous
epistolary manner of the Roman Curia under the great Inno
cent. Piero della Vigna quite probably owed the Archbishop
of Palermo's recommendation to the fact that the Emperor
was anxious for his Chancery to attain the same distinction
of style as the Curia. Delia Vigna's first petition must have
displayed remarkable skill to lead to his reception in the High
Court. The value which Frederick II attached to the style
of his letters, and his ambition to compete in this with the
Curia, would have combined with his own artistic appreciation
to perceive the political significance of such unusual ability.
The Emperor had to win public opinion by his manifestos,
which supplied in the Christian world the place of the ancient
Forum. Epistolary art replaced the forensic eloquence of Rome
and the Greek cities. People justly compared Piero della Vigna,
the orator of Capua, to Cicero.
There was at the beginning of the thirteenth century in
Capua a flourishing school of written rhetoric, of which Piero
della Vigna himself was a product. It was extremely signifi
cant that he established a close connection between it and the
High Court and even transplanted it to the imperial Chan
cery. The Chancery itself thus became a school of rhetoric,
the focus of the literary life of the Court. Everything about
HIS PUPILS 303
the Emperor's Court which seems a foretaste of Humanism : the
reversion to classic models ; the Emperor's cult of Rome ; his
echo of the Caesars in formula and title, simile and metaphor,
all this had its roots in the learned circles of Piero della Vigna,
who were inspired on their side by the presence of a living
Caesar. The two reinforced each other : Frederick II could
pose as Caesar because his entourage could accept him in such
a role, and he was driven to pose as Caesar because rhetorical
and literary style proclaimed him such. The same applied to
his Christian attitude : for the imperial art of letter-writing
sprang from the curial style which provided all the Biblical
comparisons, including the comparisons with Christ. This
blend of the Christian and the ancient Roman which prevails
in Frederick's writing and smacks of the Renaissance, is the
product of this group of stylists to whom a knowledge of the
Bible was as necessary as a knowledge of the classics. This
does not explain their vigour. The many private letters of
these imperial chancery officials that have come down to us are
convincing proof of the passion for knowledge that possessed
these men, when once they had breathed the strong intellectual
atmosphere of the imperial court. A wretched notary writes
from prison to his friends to send him a Livy or some other
historian, feeling convinced that he was " not worthy to un
loose the latchet of their shoes." These officials shared the
view the Emperor loved to inculcate : that " fame comes through
knowledge, honour comes through fame, and riches come
through honour."
The High Court and the Chancery itself distributed to the
widest possible circles this knowledge which the Emperor so
highly prized and his courtiers coveted. " The breasts of
rhetoric have suckled many eminent minds at the imperial
court," writes Piero della Vigna to a younger friend, whom he
later brought to court and with whom, as with others, he kept
up a correspondence that served the purpose also of exercises in
style. This may have been a usual way of giving lessons in
letter-writing, so that the letter served a double purpose. It is
no matter for surprise that the later stylists were, for the most
part, della Vigna 's compatriots : Campanians if not Capuans.
A number of his pupils are known, who themselves became the
304 THE FRUITFUL VINEYARD v. 3
instructors of literary youth. John of Capua calls himself the
pupil of Piero della Vigna. In a letter of consolation addressed
to two of the Emperor's secretaries about the death of a third
(all three having also been disciples of the great High Court
Judge) he paints a very vivid picture of della Vigna Js human
methods : " Well I know how our master and only benefactor
Piero della Vigna is shocked by the death of such a friend. For
he had, with good reason, cherished the greatest hopes that his
vineyard (vinea) would have brought forth three shoots from
a fruitful vine and that he might have presented to the Emperor
from the womb of his beloved, three worthy disciples, three
wooers of his own worth, three followers of his own life. The
unknowing would have sought to ascertain, the knowing would
have marvelled, how all three had received the same teaching
in the same manner from such a teacher, and how one affection
had united all the three. Happy indeed this community of
three in one, where domestic love unites teacher and pupils."
This indicates the school-like character of the Capuan tradition.
The inevitable jealousy of the courtiers is hinted at when we
read that Piero della Vigna wins fame and praise, and envy too,
when his pupils " find grace in the eyes of the Prince " and
receive posts from him " who loveth the tribe of the young."
Della Vigna is constantly alluded to in court circles with a pun
on his name as the " fruitful vineyard." He was the centre and
soul of all this courtly activity, and they turned to him for en
lightenment when the courtiers " fell to merry quarrelling "
over one problem or another, as intellectual men are wont to do
in company.
Delia Vigna enjoyed the Emperor's complete confidence.
There was no lack of sycophants who flattered " the Master's
Vineyard." One prelate wrote : " Vinea was the Petrus on
whose rock the Emperor's Church was founded when the
Emperor refreshed his spirit by a meal with his disciples."
They called him " the Emperor's Vicar," corresponding to the
Prince of the Apostles, Peter, Vicar of Christ, and as such the
" Bearer of the Keys " of this world's empire, of the Emperor's
heart, a simile of which Dante later made use. Della Vigna's
indirect influence on Court society was no less great. Men
hummed round him as Frederick's favourite ; the highest
SECULAR LITERATURE 3°5
dignitaries of Church and State inquired of him the general
temper of the Court, the mood of the " Dominus " or the
" Caesar. " They reproached him for his long silence, or for
warded requests and recommendations for the Emperor,
begging his support. All these letters seek to attain the lofty
style of the master, and his answers often show a touch of
delicate irony as he couches them in even more pompous
phrase and metaphor. Piero della Vigna maintained inter
course with the law professors of Bologna for some time. But
whereas in earlier days Roman Emperors turned to Bologna to
enquire the interpretation or application of a law, the doctors of
Bologna now betook themselves to Frederick II to enquire from
him about some enactment peculiar to Sicily, and right gladly
Frederick answered them. Piero della Vigna's Constitutions
of Melfi represent one of the greatest legal achievements of
the century. Commentaries on the Liber Augustalis began to
appear almost at once, and many of the commentators were
alumni of the University of Naples. Thus one creation reacted
on the other.
The art of writing Latin verse was part of the school routine
for students of style and rhetoric ; it was practised almost
exclusively in legal stylistic circles. Secular Latin literature
was a relatively late growth in Italy, and one of the earliest
goliard compositions in Italy is ascribed to Piero della Vigna.
It is a long satirical poem, directed against the greed of prelates
and mendicant monks, and differs from the other songs of
vagrant poets by its positive political importance. Piero's
pupils also wrote Latin verse : Master Terrisius of Atina,
author of a lengthy poem, was counted among his friends. The
Chronicler, Richard of San Germane, who interwove a number
of poems with the text of his chronicle, was also a notary, but
he did not belong to the actual della Vigna circle. Nor did the
judge, Richard of Venusia, who composed a comedy in distichs
full of topical allusions to imperial officials. He dedicated his
comedy to the Emperor. It was the first effort of its kind.
Works in Greek verse were not unheard of in official circles.
Calabria was still largely Greek in speech, and is said to have
been the means of introducing a knowledge of ancient Greek
to Renaissance scholars. Barlaam, who is the reputed Greek
3o6 INFLUENCE ABROAD v. 3
teacher of both Petrarch and Boccaccio, was a Calabrian. The
Constitutions of Melfi were soon translated into Greek, and we
possess a number of Greek letters from Frederick (who was a
master also of that language) to his son-in-law John Vatatzes,
Emperor of Nicaea. They were probably drafted by the same
Greek-speaking notary as was usually employed to translate
Greek documents into Latin, John of Otranto. An iambic
poem of his on the Siege of Parma has been preserved. This
episode also formed the subject of a long poem by the Charto-
phylax, Georgios of Gallipoli in Calabria, together with an
enthusiastic encomium on Frederick II in which the Emperor
figures as Zeus, the Thunder God and Lightning- Wielder of
Greek mythology A supernatural atmosphere thus surrounded
the Hohenstaufen, which was revealed in a remarkable manner
to the later humanists. The story goes that in 1497 a carp was
caught in a pond at Heilbronn, in whose gills, under the skin, a
copper ring was fastened, with a Greek inscription which stated
that Frederick II, with his own hand, had released this fish.
The humanists were much struck by " the remarkably life-
giving quality of the hand Friderici Secundi " and particularly
stirred by the inscription's being in Greek, and they decided that
Frederick's intention must have been to quicken to new life
the study of Greek in Germany by this message of a dumb fish.
The intellectual influence exercised in foreign countries by
the Hohenstaufen 's court is revealed in a Latin poem of the
Englishman, Henry of Avranches, who offered his services to
the Emperor about this time. The poet shows himself a man
well skilled in every branch of stylistic art, master of all the
early humanistic culture of his day like John of Salisbury. He
writes at great length on the origin of Latin poetry, which came
from the Hebrews to the Greeks, through Adonis and Sappho,
and from the Greeks passed to the Latins, tod which he him
self venerates and practises. Verse is the divine form of speech,
and the man who can convert prose into verse can also trans
form the caves of a savage country into dwelling-houses. He,
therefore, the Englishman, would fain live at the Emperor's
court and be his comrade in the art of poetry or renounce his
honour as the king of song.
The Emperor himself did not write Latin verse — if we
INTELLECTUAL ATMOSPHERE 307
except the verse inscriptions on imperial castles and forts, and
a few occasional couplets which tradition ascribes to him.
Nevertheless, he was in close touch with the stylists and their
work. He shared their scholarship to a very large extent, and
we are told in many places that he was able himself to speak
with great eloquence and skill, though he later preferred to
allow Piero della Vigna to make his speeches for him, taking a
verse of Ovid for a text as readily as a messianic saying from
the Bible. The Emperor had no craving for displaying his
skill, and shrewdly refrained from over-much public speaking.
Popular opinion averred : "He speaks little, knows much and
can do much." It must have had all the more immense effect
when, on really important occasions, the Emperor himself
spoke after Piero della Vigna. A report informs us what a
shudder of amazement seized the people on one occasion, when,
from his throne, raised high above the heads of the multitude,
the Sacred Majesty of the Emperor solemnly spoke down and
defended itself against the Bishop of Rome. Perhaps the
custom of princely ceremonial speeches dates from Frederick
II, who has been called the " mirror of the world in speech and
custom. " With the great Hohenstaufen such speeches were
provoked only by stern necessity ; no prince of the Renaissance
will have been able to evoke the magic shudder that greeted
Frederick's voice.
The magnificent gestures of a world-monarch came naturally
to Frederick. Not less natural was his readiness to relax in the
company of his intimate friends, when he could feel sure that
none of his words would be misunderstood. Above all other
things he loved good conversation ; witty and intellectual talk,
in which he joined with an indescribable charm of his own, was
an absolute necessity to him. He had no need to summon a
Voltaire from abroad to provide the dilicatoparlare that he loved.
There were, it is true, many foreign scholars at his court, but
their business was to conduct research in definite philosophic
or scientific subjects and to expound these afresh, communicat
ing their results to the court, most frequently through the
medium of Frederick himself.
308 YOUTH AND AGE v. 3
The whole court shared his spirit. There was none who
did not, to the measure of his ability, respond to the intellectual
stimulus of the Emperor's personality, and a very considerable
proportion of his knowledge and modes of thought communi
cated itself to the court officials, notaries, and stylists of his
entourage. Years after his death it is still possible to tell with
almost absolute certainty whether the writer of a given letter
had been in touch with one of those sucklings " of the milk of
rhetoric at the imperial court."
Certain philosophical lines of thought which were simply
dubbed " Ghibelline ideas" in later times were a product of
the spirit that flowed from Frederick II and his circle : The
recurrence of Nature, Reason, Necessity in certain connections,
the belief in Fortune instead of Providence, the disappearance of
threadbare Bible tags in favour of quotations from the classics.
Frederick's contemporaries were ripe for these things. Delia
Vigna's activity has shown, however, how conscious, intentional
and well-thought-out was the intellectual preparation of the
ground.
It was something like a new gospel that emanated from the
court, and one of the tokens of it was the inrush of a youthful
spirit into an age of decadence and decay — a living something
that drew into itself all that was actively alive. Outworn
mental attitudes had no place in this State. The whole imperial
group was young, not only in spirit but in years, incomparably
young, full-blooded and alive. Aged, aged Pope Gregory
had good reason to feel afraid ; he even lodged a complaint
against the excessive youthfulness of the imperial officials. The
Emperor curtly retorted that it was none of the Pope's business,
and begged to call the Pope's attention to the fact that, accord
ing to the Sicilian Book of Laws, to debate about the suitability
of imperial officers was sacrilege. That was fairly cynical.
Indeed an immeasurable cynicism, a sign of vigorous Ijfe,
prevailed in the circle of Frederick and his friends, especially in
reference to their opponents. Not towards opponents only.
Frederick always found it hard to repress his acid wit and pro
bably gave it free rein amongst his intimates, pouring scorn
not only on the Pope but on friends and contemporaries. He
made merry over the envoys of his faithful Cremona and
CYNICISM 309
mimicked their absurd way of speaking, how they must first
indulge in reciprocal flatteries before one of them would open
his business. He said of his friend, the Margrave of Mont-
ferrat, that you would need a pickaxe to hew money out of him
— a saying that a troubadour swiftly seized on and wove into
his sirventes. He even indulged in mockery of Chingiz Khan,
who had proposed (what would scarcely have been conceivable
save for the Asiatic perspective) that Frederick II should do
him homage and accept appointment at the Court of the Great
Khan. The Emperor's prompt repartee was that he would
apply for the post of falconer. On the other hand, the Emperor
was only amused when one of his friends aimed a shaft at him.
The chronicler remarks that Eccelino of Romano would have
visited such a jest with instant death.
These are all signs of the intellectual freedom and detachment
of the Emperor himself and his court. It was freedom on a
large scale. Each of the imperial jests, each of the blasphemies
which frequently leaked out, was a challenge to an entire world.
These cynicisms would have been wholly unjustified had not
Frederick himself been able to build up a new world with its
own new sanctities. If anyone dared to breathe against the
holy things of the State, Frederick took umbrage immediately:
" He who provokes the Emperor with words is punished with
deeds." The officials were not slow to catch their master's
tone. One of his underlings speaks words that might be
Frederick's own : some Guelf prisoners were to be executed,
and confession was refused them with the taunt that it was quite
supererogatory for them ; as friends of the Pope they were all
holy together and would alight forthwith in Paradise. Before
the days of Frederick II no one would have ventured such a jest.
It presupposes an inexpressible contempt for the accepted
dogmas of a future life and a complete fearlessness of death.
This effect of Frederick's influence was inevitable and would
certainly have been fraught with extreme danger had it not
been for the restraints of the State. On Frederick's own lips
such remarks, provoked by sheer defiance, are merely a by
product of his free-ranging mind that shrank from no breadth
or depth or height.
3io FREDERICK'S SLAVES v.3
People have often praised Frederick for his disregard of
position and parentage in his choice of officials. His appoint
ment of town-bred lawyers and his reinforcement of official
cadres by outsiders seem to support this view. He was actuated
not so much by freedom from snobbery as by a love of playing
the oriental despot, who can take his scullion of to-day for his
Grand Wazir of to-morrow — a trait which is quite in character.
A whole army of slaves, male and female, were attached to
the imperial establishment, many of them Moors — who were
mainly employed in divers duties in the imperial residences.
Frederick had quarters in a number of places : Lucera, Melfi,
Canosa, Messina, to which special interest attaches. Until
recently it was the fashion to consider these arsenals and
clothing stores as imperial harems, and this belief was strength
ened by some instructions of the Emperor, that the girls
employed there should be provided with clothing and should
be kept at their spinning when not otherwise occupied.
People affected to consider this a humane and domestic trait of
the Emperor in relation to his concubines. It is clear from the
wording of his orders that the Saracen girls were in charge of
eunuchs, but this would have been necessary for the discipline
of Saracen slave women, employed at the looms and in the
workshops which supplied the needs of the court, the clothing
for the army, woollen coverlets and costly saddlecloths and
trappings for horses, camels and hunting leopards ; we have
no ground for assuming that the women were the odalisques of
their lord. In these same quarters weapons and armour were
manufactured, machines of war, riding and pack saddles.
Frederick frequently fetched craftsmen from a distance to
teach his slaves : a Syrian master perhaps for cross-bows, or
a Pisan for chain mail.
Apart from the staffs of these provincial quarters there was
a personal retinue which accompanied the Emperor on all his
campaigns, baggage train and staff and everything appertaining,
an immense following which was permanently in attendance.
A most amazing cavalcade — such as the West had never seen —
like the state of an oriental monarch, always followed Frederick
on his journeys after his return from the East. Apart from
administrative officials, High Court Judges and the Saracen
HIS MENAGERIE 311
bodyguard, a complete menagerie was in his train, that brought
people crowding in from miles around : strange beasts, un
seen before, some of which were useful in hunting, but whose
chief function was to add to the glamour and mystery of
imperial majesty. Costly four-in-hand teams drew mighty
wagons laden with treasure, richly caparisoned camels bearing
burdens were escorted by uncounted slaves, gaudily arrayed
in silken tunics and linen gear. Leopards and lynxes, apes and
bears, panthers and lions, were led on the chain by Saracen
slaves. The Emperor even possessed a giraffe. Add to these
countless dogs, hawks, barn owls, horned owls, eagles and
buzzards, every type of falcon, white and coloured peacocks,
rare Syrian doves, white Indian parakeets crowned with yellow
tufts of feathers, African ostriches, and, finally, the elephant with
his wooden tower on his back, in which were seated Saracen
marksmen and trumpeters. On triumphal occasions, once in
Cremona for instance, the Emperor himself rode at the head of
this procession : the God-man visibly elevated above all the
creatures of the world.
The number of animals alone, many of which people scarcely
knew by name, let alone by sight, thrilled the world with
excitement. All chroniclers give complete details about the
imperial procession. Brunetto Latini, Dante's teacher, lets
himself go about the elephant in Cremona which had dashed a
donkey to the ground with its trunk ; apart from what he
had actually seen he retails all sorts of marvellous tales : that
the elephant, which was a present to the Emperor from King
John of Jerusalem, would never step on to a ship until it had
been promised a safe return, and that before copulation it must
eat a mandragora root which grows only in the neighbour
hood of the earthly paradise. When the elephant entered at
last, the spectators waited breathlessly to see its bones turn
into ivory. Others gave their attention to other animals ; the
Frenchman, Villard de Honnecourt, who once saw this zoo
logical collection on his travels, sketched the lion and wrote
underneath : " Ci lions fu contrefais al vif."
The rest of the Emperor's escort aroused nearly as much
speculation as the exotic animals. For the court retinue in
cluded Saracen women and eunuchs, as people never failed to
3i2 MOORS AND NEGROES v.3
note when the train passed through the Italian towns . Nothing
was more obvious — even without the hints of the Pope's letter
— than to see in these veiled women the favourite concubines
of the already legendary harem. The very uncertainty was
stimulating. Whether these girls, like the acrobats, conjurors
and rope dancers who were often in attendance, were kept by
the Emperor merely for the entertainment their skill provided
(as Kaiser Frederick protested in innocent surprise to the
reproaches of the Pope) or whether Frederick made use of them
on occasion in other ways (" swept away by their charms,"
as the Pope preferred to imagine) could not be ascertained.
* Who could testify in the matter ? " as the Emperor's ambas
sador later said to the Council of Lyon. They were simply
part of the court staff, maidservants and slave-girls, perhaps also
dancers and singing-girls, which fitted in with the oriental
arrangements of the Emperor's court.
The Emperor's staff included also numerous male slaves,
whose duties were very various, and ranged from personal
attendance on the monarch to the most menial tasks. The
Emperor provided suitable education and training on the most
varied lines for the abler ones. Many were taught to read and
write Arabic. Another time he selected negro boys between
sixteen and twenty to form a musical corps ; they were
magnificently clad and taught to blow large and small silver
trumpets. We may assume that the duty of this imperial band
was to play at meal times, since the courts of Anjou and
Aragon, whom Frederick copied in every way, indulged this
custom. Black page boys are frequently mentioned ; one pair
of these servitelli nigri1 were called Muska and Marzukh, and
they brought down on the Emperor from the Pope the re
proach of " scarcely veiled sodomy." When Frederick's wrath
fluttered his accusers they later tried to take the sting out of
this by returning to the innuendoes about the Saracen girls and
the harem of Gomorra. One of these boys will probably be
the slave who grew up at the imperial court and rose to
hold the highest offices of state, Johannes Maurus.1 The
slave-woman's son attracted the Emperor's attention ; he
1 The Middle Ages were little interested in ethnology : Moors, Arabs,
Negroes were indiscriminately nigri. — Tr.
JOHANNES MAURUS 313
became guardian of the Emperor's chamber, rose to still more
important positions, received a barony, and later, under
King Conrad, became Chief Chamberlain, Commandant of the
fortress of Lucera, and finally Lord 'Treasurer of the Sicilian
kingdom. Ultimately he was overtaken by the usual fate of
the slave who attains great office : he turned traitor and paid
the penalty. The Pope took him into favour, but he was mur
dered by the Saracens who had remained faithful to Manfred.
This was another of the types represented at the Court of
Frederick II. There were isolated Saracen officials under
Frederick, as under the Normans, especially in the departments
of Customs and Finance, but they tended to disappear and no
other had so brilliant a career as Johannes Maurus.
Beside the town-bred literati who grouped themselves round
Piero della Vigna and the foreigners, there was a third group of
officials, the aristocratic knights. Though Frederick looked
more to the efficiency than to the origin of his officers, yet the
posts of Justiciar, or, as they were later called in Northern Italy,
the posts of Vicar and Vicar- General, were reserved almost
exclusively for the lower, less wealthy nobility. The mere
possession of a fief was not. as in Norman times a qualification
for office ; the decisive factor was the person. The nobleman
could achieve distinction only by his personal service and ac
cording to his individual ability. It is the more remarkable that
not only the circle of stylists who surrounded della Vigna, but
the overwhelming majority of knightly aristocratic officials were
drawn from Beneventan or Campanian stocks, were supple
mented to a certain extent from Apulia. The Morra family
to which the Grand Master Justiciar belonged came from
Benevento. They liked to trace their descent, which, however,
shared the uncertainty common to all Italian genealogies, back
to a certain Gothic Chieftain, King Totila. The Lords of
Aquino, who boasted a Lombard descent, came from Campania.
They espoused the Emperor's cause more warmly than any of
his other supporters, and Frederick even took a wife from
among them. The only untypical scion of the house was the
saint, Thomas Aquinas. A third famous family, the Filan-
PAGES v. 3
gieri, claimed to be of Breton lineage and to have come to
Sicily with the Normans ; they had their seat in the ancient
principality of Benevento. The house of Eboli were also
reputed to be Lombards. The Montefusculi and the Monte-
neri came from Benevento, and also the Counts of Caserta, into
whose family also Frederick married. Other celebrated ser
vants of the Emperor were the Cicala, probably originally from
Genoa, the Acquaviva, settlers in the Abruzzi, the Caraccioli
from Naples, the Ruffi from Calabria. The kernel of the
kingdom was undoubtedly the Campanian-Beneventan strip,
which was full of Lombard blood and had been early con
quered by the Normans. It had been less exhausted by racial
admixtures than other regions : one is reminded of the similar
importance of the Lombard factor in the culture of Tuscany.
What influenced the Emperor was the fact not of their Ger
manic descent but of their undegenerate quality. Frederick
liked to boast himself " the offshoot of a new breed " and
never counted in the South as a northern foreigner. Nothing,
therefore, was further from Frederick's intention than to
create antagonisms where none existed, by re-awakening half-
forgotten Germanic memories.
Frederick had, at first, to make use of the Sicilian-Italian
nobility as he found them. Gradually, as time went on, this
aristocracy, having breathed the air of the court, began to
mould itself to a given model, as new generations arose both
under Frederick and after him. We gain a vivid insight into all
the chivalrous activities of the court — for the court was still
strong in knightly tradition — by following out the education
and evolution of the nobly born official. The men who were
later to attain the highest posts had nearly all served in their
boyhood as pages in the Emperor's immediate circle, and en
joyed that knightly education which is familiar from the court
poetry of the time. This education now had a new direction,
for it combined knightly culture with the hope of future
official employment.
In Frederick's vicinity we meet at every turn the noble
pages, or, to use the French phrase inherited from Norman days,
the valetti imperatoris. No nobleman could become a knight
unless he had served as page to some great man, Emperor or
EDUCATION OF A PAGE 315
Pope, or to some spiritual or secular prince. It was customary
for the Sicilian nobility to pass the years of boyhood at the
imperial court. Service began at the age of fourteen. Prior
to this boys of noble birth will have been taught in one of the
monasteries. We know of Thomas Aquinas that " as a small
boy he had to share the lot of the other noble youths who re
ceived instruction in Monte Cassino, as was customary in the
country of the saint." Having once come to court the pages
belonged to the Emperor 'sfamilia, received from him a salary
of six ounces of gold a month, were entitled to two shield-
bearers and three horses (which, like themselves, were main
tained by the court), and for the rest formed the lowest rung of
the ladder of chivalry, as they are styled in the Sicilian Book of
Laws. If a page insults a knight who is of higher rank than
himself his hand is cut off. The pages, while at court and not
employed on special service, were under the orders of the
Seneschal. They fought under his flag, and they had to keep
him informed of their comings and goings, even though the
Emperor might be already aware of them.
The Emperor took a personal interest in the pages : one who
was sick was sent to Apulia for change of air ; another at court
expense to the baths of Pozzuoli and Salerno. The pages'
duties were very various. Some were told off for personal
attendance on the Emperor ; one was despatched for the honour
able duty of meeting the messenger of Michael Cornnenus,
another for the reception of the Duke of Carinthia. Their
more particular duties concerned all matters of chivalry. We
find imperial pages employed in the royal stables, others in the
kennels, another in attendance on the hunting leopard, a large
number busied about Frederick's favourite pastime : falconry.
Frederick's passion for hawking is well known. People were
so well accustomed to see the Emperor in hunting dress that
green became the fashionable colour amongst the Ghibelline
partisans in Northern Italy. A papal chronicler writes mockingly
that: "Frederick degrades his majestic title to huntsman's
work, and instead of adorning himself with laws and weapons,
he surrounds himself with panthers, hounds and screeching
birds, and converts the Emperor into a follower of the chase.
He exchanges his illustrious sceptre for a spear and disputes
316 THE IDEAL FALCONER v.3
with eagles their triumph in bird-slaying. " The imperial
hunstman needed numerous pages at hand, and kept them
fully employed. There were hawks to be conveyed to the
Apulian barons, to be cared for during their mewing ; there
were the Emperor's sacri falcones to be fetched from Apulia ;
other pages were sent to Malta, others again as far as Liibeck,
to bring back certain types of falcon. It was probably excep
tional for the lads to be permitted to take any actual part in the
hawking. The Emperor's standard for an " ideal falconer "
was high. He draws a picture of one in his book on falconry :
quick wit, sharp sight, good memory, acute hearing, courage
and endurance are essential, and the perfect falconer must be of
medium height — long-legged ones are useless. Folk who were
only half or quarter-qualified were not allowed near the birds,
and the over-young must first grow useful in the Emperor's
service. It is expressly stipulated : " The falconer must not
be too boyish in behaviour, lest his boyishness lead him to
transgress against the art ; for boys are wont to be impatient,
and delight chiefly in seeing beautiful flights and many of them.
But we do not banish boys completely, for even they will grow
wiser. . , ."
The pages remained at court till they won their knightly
girdle, often with the Emperor's direct assistance. Some of
them then left the court and returned to live in their own
baronies, or enlisted as mercenary knights in the imperial
armies and are thus lost to sight. Others entered the state
service, and this possibility may well have been one of the
main attractions of coming as a page to court. The Apulian
families sent nearly all their sons. Two lords of Aquino,
several Morras,one Caraccioli,one Count Caserta, one Filangieri,
one Acquaviva ; the sons of captains of fortresses, of non-
official feudal barons, and many others served as pages. Some
times the Emperor commanded the attendance of a boy at
court, and he often sought out those who would be " responsive
to the imperial discipline " in order to " receive them into the
arms of his education " and interest himself like a father in
their fortunes, though they had been begotten by another. He
writes once to the father of one of his pages : " We have heaped
on him the beginnings of all the virtues, so that he may grow
SCHOOL OF LIFE 317
worthy of himself, useful to others and may bear fruit for us,"
and, further, that these young men " who live in our service with
honour and die in joy of great deeds may not pine away in
feeble vices or anaemic anxieties." Sicily was not the only
country represented by pages at the imperial court ; Northern
Italians came also, and when Frederick II was in Cyprus he
took a son of John of Ibelin into his service as a page. Simi
larly, during a short stay in Vienna at a later date, he brought
back Berthold and Godfrey, two sons of the Margravine of
Hohenburg, as pages to Italy, for whom a brilliant career was
in store, almost the only Germans in the Sicilian State.
We hear nothing of any special instruction of the pages
in administrative work, and probably there was none. The
Emperor might well reflect that these young noblemen would
see and hear enough during their years in his immediate en
tourage to be ready to take over even the highest office. A lad
of twenty who had served for years at court, even though
nominally in charge merely of falcons and leopards, must have
acquired as much savoir vivre as many an aged bishop. What
they lacked in experience was richly compensated for by
complete loyalty and eagerness to serve. In this connection
we may recall Goethe's dictum : " If I were a prince, I should
never give the first places to people who had come gradually
into prominence merely on account of birth and seniority. . . .
I should have YOUNG MEN . . . then it would be a joy to reign."
Under Frederick II we often find, in fact, quite young noble
men who had been pages holding the highest posts as his
representatives. The Hohenburg brothers can scarcely have
reached the middle twenties when they were Captains General
in Northern Italy. Count Richard of Caserta and Thomas of
Aquino junior were younger still when the Emperor entrusted
similar posts to them. We know with considerable certainty
that Landolfo Caraccioli, who afterwards became Justiciar of
the students at Naples, was in 1239 a sixteen-year-old page,
yet before Frederick's death he was officiating as Vicar in a
most difficult post in Tuscany in the upper valley of the Arno.
Other nobles who appear as pages of the Emperor at a later
date reappear in responsible posts under King Manfred :
Berard of Acquaviva, as Justiciar of the island of Sicily, the
318 MANFRED'S EDUCATION v.3
younger Richard Filangieri as Captain of the Mainland, and
many others. We cannot be sure whether noble pages at
tended the University of Naples, but the imperial page Nicholas
of Trani, for instance, later entered the judicial service and
was High Court Judge in Manfred's time. This is the first
example of the infusion of the spirit of the town-bred jurist
into the knightly nobility ; later jurists were sometimes raised
to knightly rank, and their sons were received as pages by the
Angevin kings.
The Emperor's own sons, whether legitimate or not, mostly
grew up among the young nobles at court, and the sons of
foreign princes were frequently educated with them. There
appears to be no record of what became of the two orphaned
sons of King John of Jerusalem, the young brothers-in-law
of the Emperor, whom he invited to his court. His cousin
Frederick, son of the King of Castile, was sent to grow up under
Frederick's tutelage. The offspring of the Staufen-Castilian
breed l were, however, neither to hold nor to bind. Frederick
of Castile ran away from the Emperor after a few years : so did
his brother, Henry of Castile, a wilder dare-devil still, who,
after an adventurous life, was to exert a potent influence in
Italian politics in late Hohenstaufen times. King Enzio must
have spent some of his boyhood at the Sicilian court, and
Frederick of Antioch, too, another natural son of the Emperor.
We have considerable detail about Manfred's education at this
intellectual court. He was eighteen when his father died, and
Kaiser Frederick, in his later years, loved him more than any
of his other sons. " A host of learned doctors " gave him
lessons and taught him " about the nature of the world, the
origin and development of the body, the creation of souls,
their immortality and the methods of perfecting them, the
transitory nature of matter, the security of eternal things."
From his childhood Manfred clung to the ways of thought of
his father, who was both nurse and mother to him. It was in
1 Beatrice, daughter of Philip of Swabia was Frederick IPs first cousin,
she married Ferdinand of Castile : this Frederick and Henry are her sons.
—TV.
A KING'S DUTY 319
response to Manfred's urgent entreaties that Frederick II
composed his Falcon Book.
Manfred is said to have later been put under the special care
of Berthold of Hohenburg, the sometime page. The heir of
the Empire, on the other hand, King Conrad, left his father's
court at the age of seven, nominally to take over the Govern
ment of Germany. His tutor was a Neapolitan knight, " to
whom Conrad's education was entrusted on account of his
noble race, his great wisdom and eloquence, and his high
character, in order that the lad by the elevating example of such
a master might be thoroughly educated in every type of virtue,
wisdom and self-control." This Neapolitan was presumably
a Caraccioli, since Landolfo Caraccioli, himself then sixteen,
accompanied the young king to Germany as a page. We also
learn that Conrad was taught with a large number of other boys
of noble birth, and the story goes that whenever the young king
was at fault his teacher used to thrash one of the other boys,
for if the young king had a generous heart it would be parti
cularly painful to him to see others, who were innocent,
punished for his guilt.
Some didactic letters of the Emperor to this son are pre
served in which Frederick II strives to explain the true dignity
of a king. Although Conrad is addressed as a " divine scion
of the race of the Caesars," the letters show how soberly and
clearly people at the imperial court thought about the Ruler's
office, for all their hero-worship of the Ruler. " Famous
extraction alone is not sufficient for kings nor for the great
men of the earth, unless noble personal character is wedded
to illustrious race, unless outstanding zeal reflects glory on the
prince's rank. People do not distinguish Kings and Caesars
above other men because they are more highly placed, but
because they see farther and act better. As men they stand
equal to other men by their humanity, they are associated with
them in life, and have nothing to pride themselves on, unless
by virtue and by wisdom they outshine other men. They are
born as men, and as men they die," Only by wisdom of the
spirit — Frederick writes again — are kings distinguished from
other men, and it is incomparably more vicious for a prince to
fail in serving wisdom and to remain in ignorance than for a
320 FOCUS OF STATE v.3
private individual, " for the nobility of his royal blood has made
a king more susceptible to the teachings of wisdom by inspiring
him with a noble and fastidious soul . . . hence it is necessary
and seemly that thou shouldest love wisdom, and for her sake
it is fitting that thou lay aside the Caesars' dignity, and under
the master's rod and the ferule of the teacher be neither king
nor emperor but pupil." And again : " We do not forbid thee
to practise with skilful people in due time and place the wonted
royal pastime of hawking and the chase. But we adjure thee
and wish to warn thee that in hunting and hawking thou do not
indulge in too familiar converse with beaters and keepers and
huntsmen, that they with presumptuous words impair the
royal dignity, or with chatter demean it and corrupt good
morals/'
It is easy to forget that for all its learning and law-plying
Frederick's court was none the less a knightly medieval court,
which for many decades was a focus of chivalry. This was of
prime importance for Italy and enabled her to develop the life
of courts and kings. Frederick II and his court belonged far
more to Italy than the remote Norman Court had done. For
years the Emperor's headquarters camp wandered round
central and northern Italy, and even when the Emperor re
turned to his southern home he still remained in full view of
Italy, since he resided wholly in the north of his peninsular
territory. It may cause surprise that the Emperor so rarely
sought in Palermo, the old Norman capital, the joys and delights
of Sicily which he loved to extol.
The tales of a brilliant Hohenstaufen court at Palermo belong
to the realm of myth. During the last ten years of his reign
Frederick II only once set foot on the island, to suppress the
insurrection of 1233 in Messina. Palermo was still the capital
of the kingdom, but only in name ; with Frederick II it had
lost for practical reasons the privileged position of a royal
residence. It could only be reached direct by a long sea
journey or by a wearisome land march from the Straits, and was
much too far out of the world for the Ruler of an Empire.
Frederick had to shift the focus of his State to the spot where
FREDERICK'S HEADQUARTERS 321
its main strength was to be found : his most northern pro
vinces.
Frederick had praised Apulia (the Adriatic coast provinces)
and the Terra Laboris (the Campania of our day) above the
Land of Promise, had boasted himself a " man of Apulia," and
his actual home was now the land lying between these two —
the Capitanata surrounding the Gulf of Manfredonia. Up to
Frederick's day the Capitanata had possessed no particular
importance, and the fact that for close on a century the threads
of world politics met here in this god-forsaken Tavoliere di
Puglia, and that the town of Foggia became renowned through
out the lands of East and West, was solely due to the Emperor's
personal preference for this province. The political factor was
undoubtedly the decisive one in Frederick's choice of these
northern regions. He was close to the scene of his northern
and central Italian battles and ready at any moment to take a
hand personally, to set out for the north, to keep an eye on
Rome. Other considerations, however, also carried weight in
in choice of this sterile region. To-day's stony desert, serving
at best for sheep runs, must in Hohenstaufen times, when all
was more fruitful and better wooded, have possessed some
amoenitas such as the ancient world had an eye for : that plea
sant alternation of mountain and hill, of forest and plain and
the neighbourhood of the sea. At no period of history, how
ever, can the Capitanata have been able to compete with the
colourful Palermo in its exotic almost tropical luxuriance, or
with the marvels of the Bay of Naples. Possibly the hunting
possibilities attracted Frederick and compensated for other
shortcomings ; there will be at least a grain of truth in that
hypothesis. Italy certainly had the impression that Frederick
lingered for the winter in Foggia and spent the summer in the
adjacent hills for the sake of hawking. The very barrenness
of the region, so obviously unexhausted, probably had more
charm for him than the thousandfold fertility of ever-pregnant
Sicily, and offered him, moreover, more raw material for
creative effort. And what a transformation Frederick suc
ceeded in producing in these northern provinces of his !
He visited the Capitanata oftener than his other provinces,
he wrote, because of his castles. He had found no castles
322 PLAN OF A CASTLE v.3
there. In 1221 he saw the Capitanata for the first time,
and he must have forthwith resolved to make this part of his
kingdom his imperial headquarters. As early as 1223 he began
the construction of his big castle of Foggia, the inscription on
which stated that Frederick had elevated the royal town into a
far-famed imperial residence. Soon there arose at reasonable
distances pleasure palaces, hunting lodges, and rural hamlets to
which there was usually attached a farm or dairy farm. These
solatia of the Emperor seemed to grow as simply and naturally
out of the soil of the Great Capitanata — to use Enzio's phrase —
as the neighbouring holy places of ancient days. The Castel
del Monte, on its lofty site near Barletta, is the best preserved
and the best known of these Hohenstaufen castles . Its ground-
plan is unique, and like many other of the Emperor's build
ings it was probably sketched by Frederick himself : a regular
octagon of yellowish limestone ; its smooth perfectly-fitting
blocks showing no joins and producing the effect of a mono
lith : at each of the eight corners a squat octagonal tower the
height of the wall ; two storeys identical in height, each con
taining eight large equal rooms, trapezium-shaped ; an octa
gonal central courtyard adorned with antique sculptures and
imitations of the antique, in the centre of which a large octagonal
basin served as bath. Every fraction of the structure displays
the mental catholicity of the Hohenstaufen court : oriental
massiveness of the whole, a portal foreshadowing the Renais
sance, Gothic windows and rooms with groined and vaulted
roofs. The defiant gloom of the tiny-windowed rooms was
mitigated by the furnishings ; the floors were of mosaic, the
walls covered with sheets of reddish breccia or white marble,
the groined vaults supported on pilasters with Corinthian
capitals, or by delicate clustered columns of white marble.
Majesty and grace were fused in one.
Frederick II never stinted well-chosen splendour, and the
exotic luxury and magnificence probably produced a more
powerful effect in these sterner northern regions than in the
half- African half-Saracen Palermo. What mysteries, what
unimagined revelries contemporaries pictured taking place
behind the mute walls of these castles ! What amazing brilli
ance they caught a glimpse of now and then ! In the rambling
FOGGIA 323
castle of Foggia, which is described as a palace rich in marble,
with statues and pillars of verd-antique, with marble lions and
basins, those legendary banquets will have taken place amid
riot and revelry the glamour of which still clings round the
memory of the Hohenstaufen Court,
" Every sort of festive joy was there united. The alternation
of choirs, the purple garments of the musicians evoked a festal
mood. A number of guests were knighted, others adorned with
signs of special honour. The whole day was spent in merri
ment, and as the darkness fell, flaming torches were kindled
here and there and turned night into day for the contests of the
players." So tells the chronicler, and yet another reports the
wonders of the inner courts which the English prince Richard,
Earl of Cornwall, was privileged to see. The English noble was
returning home from the crusade in summer heat : they first
with baths and blood-lettings and strengthening draughts made
him forget the toils and hardships of the journey and the war,
and then entertained him with every type of sport. He listened
in amazement to strange airs on strange instruments, saw the
jugglers display their skill, was ravished by the sight of lovely
Saracen maidens, who to the rhythm of cymbals and castanets
came dancing in, balanced on great balls that rolled across the
many-coloured polished floor. Tales and romances tell of the
feasts of Frederick and the glories of his court : how hundreds
of knights from all nations were entertained in silken tents,
how minstrels streamed in from every corner of the earth and
foreign embassies displayed the rarest jewels. The messengers
of Prester John brought an asbestos garment, an elixir of
youth, a ring of invisibility, and, lastly, the philosopher's stone.
Further, people told how the Emperor's court astrologer, Michael
Scot, whose name was named with shuddering curiosity, on a
hot day at a feast assembled thunderclouds at the Emperor's
command and performed other miracles.
Apulia was never to see again such chivalrous display as
flourished under Frederick II and Manfred. Chivalry itself,
bound up as it was with crusade and Minnesang, was already
growing dim in the later Staufen days. Moreover, the Anjous
324 SICILIAN POETRY v.3
who followed the Hohenstaufen in Sicily were joyless bigots,
and, although themselves Proven9al, were far less in sympathy
than the Swabian dynasty with the lighthearted, almost pagan
spirit and ihejoie de mvre of the southern troubadours.
New love poetry came to birth in the chivalrous, not in the
learned, atmosphere of Frederick's court. The much-debated
question how, and through whom, Frederick learned to know
the lyrics of Provence, and how their " transference " to the
Sicilian court is to be explained, is otiose. It would have been
inexplicable if Frederick had remained in ignorance of such
poetry. He was quite as fully in touch with the whole world of
French and Proven9al culture as with the culture of the East.
He knew both languages from boyhood, was acquainted with
their literature, and will most assuredly have read the novels
which were familiar to his court : Tristan, Lancelot and the
rest. We have evidence that he knew Merlin and the Pala-
medes of Guiron de Courtois. The troubadours sang the praise
of the Puer Apuliae, and legend located at the court of the fifteen-
year-old king the first poet-coronation of the Middle Ages, the
travelling singer crowned rex versuum who later became the
Franciscan, Fra Pacifico.
The poetry of the imperial court was imitated from the
Proven9al, both in form and content. The foreign language
was not used, however, as was customary at the courts of North
Italian nobles, such as Saluzzo and Montferrat. Here, for
the first time, poetry was written in an Italian vernacular,
the popular speech of Sicilian Apulia. There must have been
isolated forerunners writing in Sicilian — che legendary Alkamo
perhaps — but every history of Italian literature begins with the
songs of the Sicilian court. The concentration of the " Sicilian
School of Poets " which here sprang up helped immensely to
increase the influence and spread the popularity of the new
vernacular poetry, as Petrarch recalls, " in a very short
time this type of poetry, which had been born amongst the
Sicilians, spread throughout all Italy and beyond. " As late as
Dante all non-Latin poetry in Italian was dubbed " Sicilian,"
which Dante in his book De Vulgari Eloquentid explains by
saying " because, as is well known the royal throne was in
Sicily."
THE VERNACULAR 325
The times were ripe for Frederick's experiment. Starting
in Provence, the popular love poetry had spread to the other
European communities, especially the French and German, and
had been warmly welcomed. Only when its zenith was almost
overpast did it find its way to Italy, for Italy had lagged far be
hind the other European countries in evolving a native language
of its own, probably because no other country had remained
so closely in touch with Latin. The realisation that the spoken
tongue had ceased to be the speech of Rome, and had become
an independent idiom, scarcely came before the thirteenth
century. A feeling of Italian nationality, whose prophet Dante
was to be, began to dawn about the same time — later than in
other countries, delayed by the same misconception that Italian
and Latin were one. Since the rise of a national self-conscious
ness and a national language are closely related we need not
wonder that an Italian dialect first attained the dignity of a
popular language in the South Italian State of Frederick II,
that is, in that section of Italy in which national feeling had
been first and most strongly awakened.
The question what " put it into Frederick's head " to
utilise the native Sicilian dialect of Apulia for his poems in the
Proven£al style is childish. The sufficient explanation is that
he was a statesman, and the founder of a nation. It is reported
of the Normans, those highly gifted statesmen, that they had
made the attempt, albeit prematurely and unsuccessfully, to
unify the Sicilian people by introducing French : gens efficiatur
ut una. Their hope was to introduce uniformity of speech by
popularising the language of the court, for in the middle of the
twelfth century French was the language of the royal capital of
Palermo. Frederick had transferred the focus of his kingdom
from the polyglot island with its confusion of tongues to the
mainland of one speech, and it was characteristic of him that he
did not seek to import a foreign language for courtly poetry and
festivity, but seized for his experiment the raw material that
lay to hand, and moulded it to his purpose. Dante is the
witness for his success : " For although the native born Apu-
lians in general speak coarsely, some of their distinguished
people spoke in a refined manner, blending courtly turns of
speech into their songs." By the refinement and cultivation
326 HIGH SPIRITS v.3
of, the common speech Frederick and his school elevated the
local dialect to that volgare illustre of court and literature. He
thus recognised Sicilian as an independent tongue, and estab
lished a common tie between the people and their ruler " of
the new breed/* How far Frederick acted with the conscious
intention of establishing a unity of speech and race is unimpor
tant beside the fact itself that he was the most important pioneer,
as Dante was the actual creator, of modern Italian. Such an
achievement by an Emperor is unique.
The problems created by the existence of two languages,
which was, of course, a commonplace in other countries (Frede
rick was the first to issue an imperial decree in German as well
as Latin) still remained in the southern Hohenstaufen State.
The sacred Latin was indispensable to the Roman Imperator
on account of its universal validity,- and Frederick did not
dream of using for his " Holy Constitution," his " Revela
tions," his imperial decrees, any but the language of the
Caesars, which his Chancery handled with such consummate
skill. The vernacular was not stately enough for the eternal
verities ; even Dante still distinguishes between the immutable
Latin, the master, and the changeable, ephemeral vernacular,
the servant. The imperial sanctities were meant for im
mortality, but attempts were already being made in Italy to
lend a consecration to the vulgar tongue which Dante's poema
sacro finally achieved. Almost simultaneously with the first
songs of Frederick, Francis of Assisi, the " minstrel of the Lord "
had begun to sing. His was a rude vernacular, still strongly
Latin-ridden, but he was writing from an inner compulsion
which the Sicilians lacked. Frederick II used Sicilian as a
light and living speech for secular and courtly merriment, he
did not ask of it seriousness or solemnity. His songs are nothing
more than an expression ofjote de vivre and courtly life, born
of the moment and serving the moment. In comparison with
Provencal there is scarcely a new thought or feeling in the
Sicilian songs : their sole aim was to sound merry at the festive
gathering ; the important thing was not what was sung, but
that there should be singing in the speech of the people and the
language of one's neighbours. Frederick borrowed from the
singers of Auvergne, Limousin and Provence not only metre
INTELLECTUAL CHEERFULNESS 327
and content, but — what was even more vital — their joy in life,
which awakened a response in people, court and Emperor.
Nothing gives Frederick such unique distinction in the
gallery of famous monarchs as the unruffled cheerfulness which
he maintained through all vicissitudes : that intellectual cheer
fulness of the man who feels himself equal to every emergency,
whose glance scans the earth from Olympian heights and shrinks
not from contemplation of himself. This quality derives its
name from Jupiter. It is called ' 'jovialitas ' ' or " serenity ' ' in the
official language of the court. This cheerful serenity demands,
beside a princely spirit, a certain maturity, and a complete,
established, measurable world. It is rare amongst rulers :
amongst monarchs of this stature perhaps only to be met with
in Julius Caesar. After Frederick II none of the great men of
action have displayed it to the same degree. Clever and witty
kings are not uncommon ; lighthearted merry ones are found
in France ; Henry IV, drawing with his first breath the bou
quet of the wines of Gascony. They are far removed from the
lofty, imperial cheerfulness of Frederick. Cheerfulness, and
joy in living, a sense of song and ryhthm in spite of the burdens
of responsibility. No other German stock achieved this light-
hearted freedom of spirit so fully as the Hohenstaufen, and no
other Hohenstaufen in the same measure as Frederick II, who
even retained it in the midst of Empire. Frederick handed on
this quality to his handsome sons, none destined to be Emperors.
They also sang, even when tragic fate was overtaking them.
Henry, the first born, the rebel who ended his life in his father's
dungeon, did not cease his singing even as the chamberlain
stripped him of the royal insignia he had wantonly forfeited —
" In the morning he sang, and in the evening wept." Manfred,
with irresponsible folly, forgot his kingdom for his song. The
old Occursius, who had served both the imperial father and the
son, turned to Manfred shortly before they both were slain in
the battle of Benevento, reproachful yet moved : " Where now
are your fiddlers, where your poets, whom you loved more than
knights and esquires, who hoped the foe would dance to their
sweet tones ! " Enzio, in the Bologna dungeon, touched and
328 AN EMPEROR POET v. 3
cheered his very gaolers with his cheerful songs. And the
amiable and knightly Frederick of Antioch, whom men called the
King of Tuscany, sang like his brothers ; and, lastly, Conradin
sang his own death and the death of his house in a sweet song
of mourning. Not frivolity nor royal fashion is here, but an
incomparable vigour of the blood, which even in ruin demands
glory and fame. Their very beauty betrayed Manfred and Enzio
to the foe. The whole of Hohenstaufen art and all Frederick's
own compositions are steeped in this joy of living : a happy
harvest of the world he ruled and represented, a poetry of love
springing from the joy of the happy man " who understood the
art of making and of singing songs."
The new poetry was not confined to the Hohenstaufen
family, though without them it would have been unthinkable.
The art exercised wide influence because Frederick the poet
was Frederick the Emperor, and the court provided a respon
sive audience on festive occasions. The personality of
Frederick II and of Manfred counted for much, and cannot
better be explained than by Dante's praise when he breaks
forth in wrath against his contemporary nobles, especially the
successor of the Sicilian Hohenstaufen, Frederick II of Aragon
and Charles II of Anjou. " The (literary) fame of Trinacria,
if we read the signs aright, remains only to the shame of the
Italian princes who, unlike heroes but like plebeians, follow
their own conceit. The illustrious heroes Kaiser Frederick,
and Manfred his not unworthy son, revealed the nobility and
Tightness of their mind, and as long as fortune favoured them
they pursued the truly humane and despised the bestial.
Hence all such princes as were of noble heart and lofty spirit
clung to them, and in their time all the distinguished minds
of the day amongst the Latins first blossomed forth at the court
of such kings. And since Sicily was the royal seat everything
which our predecessors produced in the vulgar tongue has been
called Sicilian ; and we continue to say Sicilian, and our suc
cessors will not be able to alter this. But alas ! alas ! what poetry
do we hear from this later Frederick ? What tinkle of bells
from this second Charles ? What sound of horns from John
and Azzo the mighty margraves? save c Come, ye oppressors !
Come, ye double-dealers ! Come, ye disciples of greed ! J "
A SCHOOL OF POETS 329
When a poet of Dante's rank and courage celebrates in such
language the humanity of the " illustrious heroes " this must
have been an unusual phenomenon, as,indeed it was. Not the
least remarkable thing was the school of poets itself. Princes
of taste have frequently " patronised poetry " at their courts,
attracting players and travelling singers by largesse. This
was not Frederick's way. Rather the reverse. Frederick dis
trusted the nomad minstrel, did not encourage him in his
kingdom, and at a feast in Germany actually commanded that
not so much money should be wasted on the wandering folk.
The amazing thing was that Frederick produced all these early
poets without exception at his own imperial court. Following
the Emperor's example, the officials suddenly burst into rhyme.
The Renaissance Princes bestowed office on poets, painters
and sculptors, so also Karl August on Goethe. This was the
exact opposite of Frederick's procedure : Frederick made no
man a state official because he happened to be a poet, but the
" compelling necessity of things " evoked poetic skill from
the officials of this Emperor. Surely a phenomenon unique in
history : one of the greatest statesmen and lawgivers creates
the literary language of a whole people, and not that alone, but
during two or three generations evoked the poets of a cen
tury. This reinforces the essential truth of Damon's saying
that the laws of a State cannot be altered without altering those
also of the Muses.
It was natural that although the impetus of the new poetry
was given by the Emperor it was primarily the younger genera
tion, not Frederick's own contemporaries, who practised the
new art. None of the officials seem to have written verse
before 1231, and the heyday of the movement was a full ten
years later. The Emperor's own songs, which weie more
important in influence than in number, must have dated from
before the Crusade. The King of Jerusalem, John of Brienne,
Re Giovanni, was then at Frederick's court, and a poem of his
in the Sicilian vernacular is preserved, which cannot well be of
later date. The chronology is best established by considering
who the poets were. And since it is not a question of learned
art, but of courtly and knightly verse, we must seek the authors
amongst the aristocratic officials, especially those who, during
330 SICILIAN POETS v.3
their impressionable years, had come most strongly under the
influence of the Court.
No less than three members of the noble family of Aquino
are amongst the poets : Reginald, Jacob and Monaldo.
Reginald was page and falconer of the Emperor in 1240 and a
few years later held a certain post at Court. He wrote numer
ous poems, a line of which Dante once quoted. We have no
record of his cousin Jacob's having been a page, but Jacob's
elder brother certainly was. When the father was killed in the
Emperor's service Frederick expressly wrote that he proposed
to make himself specially responsible for the two boys, so we
may safely assume that Jacob of Aquino also belonged to the
group of noble boys educated at Court. We know nothing of
Monaldo beyond the fact that he belonged to the school of
poets. Reginald of Aquino vainly sought to lure to court his
younger brother Thomas — by far the most gifted of the family.
Piero della Vigna seconded his efforts, J)ut the young Domini
can, Thomas Aquinas, was not to be enticed. Even Frederick
himself secretly supplemented their attempts, for he liked to
dissuade gifted young noblemen from joining the mendicant
orders, which were attracting them in scores. We know that
he similarly sought to influence a young noble of Parma.
The name of Jacob of Aquino is linked by an interchange
of canzones with that of Jacopo Mostacci, one of the younger
poets, who with his brother is recorded as a page of Frederick's,
about 1240. He was later in Manfred's service as ambassador
at the Court of Aragon. A Morra, son of the Grand Justiciar,
and elder brother of one of the pages of 1240, also appears
among the court poets. Jacob of Morra was already, at this
date, Captain of the duchy of Spoleto, and on account of his
father's high position was one of the most trusted intimates of
Frederick II, one of those whom the Emperor had " brought
up as sons and from whom nothing was concealed." Jacob of
Morra had made a thorough-going study of Proven9al. One of
the troubadours, probably Hugh of St. Circq, wrote for him the
earliest Proven9al grammar that we possess, and some of the
loveliest lyrics of the Sicilian School bear the name of " Gia-
A POET IN PRISON 331
comino Pugliese." He was entrusted with one of the highest
posts in Frederick's gift, reserved for his special favourites, and
made Vicar General of the Ancona March. In this position he
betrayed his master and allowed himself to be entangled in a
conspiracy.
Another poet, Roger de Amicis, met a similar fate. He also
was amongst the highest officials, Grand Justiciar or Captain of
Sicily, and amongst other verses of his we know an interchange
of poems between him and his younger friend, Reginald of
Aquino. Roger de Amicis, one of the Emperor's intimates,
was a nobleman of Calabria. He was sent on one occasion as
ambassador to Cairo to the Egyptian court. Folco Ruffo, also
a poet, came from the same neighbourhood. He is frequently
mentioned in the later days as in Frederick's train, and must
still have been quite a young man when he witnessed the dying
Emperor's last will and testament. He belonged to the famous
family of the Ruffi, one of whom was head of the imperial
stables, and another of whom wrote, at the Emperor's request,
a book on veterinary science. Lastly, we meet Reginald of
Palermo, also a page in 1240, a Sicilian feudal baron, and per
haps he is the author of the poems preserved under the name
of Rainer of Palermo of whom nothing is known.
Numerous members of the Beneventan family of the Monte-
neri were amongst Frederick's higher officials. Reginald of
Montenero was one of the poets, and is described in a novel
which relates his adventures as a minstrel in Sardinia as
" kavaliere di corte." The kingdom of Sardinia belonged to
Enzio, and so this Montenero must, in some capacity or other,
have been his subordinate. As the imperial administration
gradually extended to the whole of Italy, and Sicilian officials
were in charge everywhere, the northward spread of vernacular
poetry is no matter for surprise. It is noteworthy that at first
only the imperial, that is Ghibelline towns, like Pisa, Arezzo,
Siena, Lucca and Florence, produced poets.
The story goes that the cultured youth of Bologna used
frequently to visit King Enzio when he was imprisoned there.
It is unlikely that Enzio made any secret of his poems, which he
valued enough to mention in his will. Guido Guinizelli may
well have been one of the visitors who will have heard them read.
332 JURISTS AS POETS v. 3
Enzio's name is often quoted in relation to the poems of the
notary, Semprebene of Bologna, one of the earliest vernacular
poets of northern Italy, and who is also counted of the Sicilian
school. A few other North Italians belong to the same school,
aristocratic officials of the Emperor, who were closely in touch
with the court. Arrigo Testa is one, a knight of Arezzo, who
was frequently posted as podesta in imperial towns, and then
spent some time in prison in Florence, where Frederick of
Antioch lived when officiating as Vicar General of Tuscany.
Frederick of Antioch was most exceptionally gifted, and his
poems signed " Re Federigo " have often been confused with
his father's. Percival Doria, podesta in Avignon, and later in
Parma under Frederick, was a Genoese. He was Captain of
the March under Manfred till he was drowned on active service
in one of Manfred's campaigns. None of King Manfred's
songs have been preserved, though he was always surrounded
by a horde of German " fiddlers " (in Tuscany they used to
sing a song that ran : " Horses we get from Spain, and clothes
from France, and here we sing and dance in Proven£al style to
new instruments from Germany "). The songs of his High
Chamberlain have fared no better, Count Manfred Maletta,
" who was great and powerful at the court of the king, rich and
beloved of Manfred . . . who was the best (poet) and perfect
in inventing canzones and melodies and had not his like in the
world for playing of stringed instruments/'
The town-bred jurists took a hand with the princely and
knightly singers in this vernacular verse-making, the first
courtly art which really united royalty, aristocracy and citizens.
These lawyer poets were fewer in number than their princely
rivals, but carried the more weight, for Piero della Vigna was
one of the first to write songs in Sicilian. He may even have
been the rallying point of the poetical school, and numbers of
the younger poets exchanged poems with him. As he had
not come into prominence much before the Crusade, and this
verse-mongering belongs to his later period, it is not unlikely
that he too owed his inspiration to the Emperor. Whether or
not, he is one of the rare poets of Frederick's own generation.
In this, as in other matters, Frederick and della Vigna are
closely bound together.
THE FIRST BUREAUCRACY 333
Through Piero della Vigna the new art spread to the jurists.
They were intellectually the most highly trained, and lin
guistically the most expert men of their time, and the most
qualified to make this new art their own and to carry it on,
when after a time the knightly poets found no disciples in their
own ranks. Thus poetry began in Italy to find its home in the
towns, just as it had in Germany, where knightly Minnesang
was succeeded by the burghers' Meistersang, until at last it
became wholly wooden and mechanical. The same danger
existed in Italy. We have probably to thank the lawyers'
cultivated sense of style for the discovery of new strophe forms
— Piero della Vigna is said to have constructed the first sonnet —
but the increasing ossification and emaciation of poetry were
due no less to their excessive learning. At last the barren waste
of legal and philosophical versification that flooded northern and
central Italy was forgotten in the " sweet new style " of Dante.
Next to Piero della Vigna, one of the best-known representa
tives of the Sicilian school, was another lawyer of the imperial
court, Notary Giacomo da Lentini. He also stood in close
relation with most of the young aristocrats, and in quantity his
output exceeds that of any other poet of the time. He is so
typical of the school that Dante in the important conversation
with Bonagiunta di Lucca picks out " the Notary " as a sample
of the old tendencies. Lastly, we should mention the later judge
Guido Colonna whose poems, like Reginald of Aquino's, Dante
quotes on occasion.
Thus in the famous, and infamous, State of Frederick II
(the " first modern bureaucracy " !) we find amongst the officials
an inner circle of scholars, poets and artists round the Emperor,
all men of greater or lesser intellectual gifts, living in consider
able intimacy, sharing each other's many-sided knowledge, and
each stimulated by the rest. How widely the Sicilian poets
differ from the troubadours in being neither wandering nor
professional minstrels ! The Sicilian poets, as later the Sicilian
sculptors, were bound to the State, were one with it. The
pillars of the new poetry were pillars of the State, which claimed
the whole of each official, his private gifts as well as his public
334 NATURAL SCIENCE v.3
service. Frederick II had the great art of enlisting everything
in his service and letting nothing waste itself in space : but this
imposed on the individual an unrelaxing tension, not easy to
be borne, from which the wandering minstrel was entirely free.
There was no lack of poetic rivalry in Sicily, but it was on a
higher plane than the troubadours' bread-and-butter competi
tion, for the Sicilian poets had no anxiety about their livelihood ;
they were one and all imperial officials.
The imperial school of poetry differed in another point from
the poetry of other courts : at Frederick's court the Lady was
not the centre of chivalrous devotion. According to oriental
custom the Empress, with her own court pomp, lived apart from
the Emperor in the " harem," and even Frederick's many
lady-loves played no role in the life of his court ; we scarcely even
know their names. There was only one centre — the Emperor.
In this matter Frederick's court more nearly resembles the
papal court than any other of the time. The Emperor's life
amongst his cultured courtiers and officials, in spite of its
intellectual recklessness, begot a tensely stimulating mental
atmosphere that had not its like in the West, a new virile spirit
which would have split everything asunder if it had not been
held in the iron grip of the State. This intellectual stimulus
was further quickened by the new knowledge of the natural
sciences which Frederick himself, supported by many foreign
scholars, introduced into his court.
The appearance of the doctrine of Necessitas, the doctrine of
natural laws inherent in things themselves, shows how daringly
advanced thought was in those days, how closely in touch with
the living and the actual. We can determine this in yet another
way. The ancients, starting from the primitive natural world
of their Gods and Heroes, rose by a study of natural laws and of
" Ananke " to a recognition of " Nous " ; then higher and ever
higher till at last only one single World-" Nous " ruled the
universe. After many hundred years the human mind was
now descending from the repose of these spiritual heights in
which all form was dissolved, retracing again in a downward
direction the path by which it had climbed up. Once again a
THE SCHOLASTIC MIND 335
recognition of the living laws of nature, more especially those
which were valid throughout the universe, a further descent
of the mind to concern itself with earth and the creatures of
earth, till Nature, Soul and Spirit, interpenetrated each other
on earth in the age of the Medicis in Florence. Each epoch of
the Middle Ages found its own time already lived through in the
past. Otto III sought to renew the days of Constantine, and
his teacher Gerbert, when he became Pope, took the name of
Sylvester II to correspond with the bishop of Rome under
Constantine. The whole thirteenth century was conscious of
a most intimate kinship with the first century of the Christian
era, introduced by the prophecy of Abbot Joachim of Flora :
the new era which was dawning would resemble that of the first
Christians under the apostles. St. Francis as a direct disciple
of the Lord seemed to fulfil the prophecy.
Frederick II sought to bring in again the age of Augustus,
and the sum of his speculation ultimately reduced itself to a
belief that just before the end of the world everything must
exactly correspond with the fulness of time of the first century.
True, the actual moment, the Day of Redemption, was in a new
sense not experienced till Good Friday of the anno santo, the
jubilee year 1300, when Dante led by Vergil entered on the path
to Paradise.
The philosophico-scientific impulses of the time revert to
the early Christian or late classical epochs. The same ancient
authors who formerly lured men up into a spiritual world of
intellectual abstractions now enabled men gropingly to feel
their way down again into the corporeal world. The whole
phantom world of late classical philosophy was rediscovered on
the way. The normal course of organic growth, to arrive at
the general law by abstraction from the individual, was reversed
in the Scholastic age. The Scholastic mind, always focussed
on the Universal as the first given premiss, the thought accus
tomed to daily converse with the " Universal," was able more
readily to grasp a general law about the collective Cosmos than
the simplest single thing on Earth, and people learned to know
Nature in her individual manifestations through intellectual
speculation about Law and Species. Anything related to
Eternity and the Universal was quickly grasped by the trained
336 A PARABLE v.3
mind : Astronomy and Mathematics were, therefore, more
immediately understood than Botany and Zoology, and these
in their turn more rapidly than the science of men. Plastic
art shows every step of the road.
The recent fashion of ascribing to the Middle Ages a feeling
for or observation of Nature is simply playing with words. The
Middle Ages certainly considered Nature holy as the eternal
order of the world, but no one before at earliest 1200 conceived
it speculatively and yet intellectually as a live thing, moved by
its own forces, throbbing with its own life. No importance
attached to it in itself ; men preferred to grasp natural pheno
mena abstractly as allegory and to interpret them transcendent-
ally. A late Alexandrine work, the Physiologus, which was trans
lated into all the vernaculars, reinforced this tendency. It was
almost the only source of natural science which the Middle
Ages possessed except Pliny and the Encyclopaedia of Isidore
of Seville, and it was by far the most popular. The Physio
logus was a natural history which gave little anecdotes about
the various animals and their habits, and recorded, at great
length, their allegorical significance. What the Lion, the Bull
and the Unicorn denoted from the moral, astral or cosmic
point of view, awakened much more interest than what they, in
fact, were.
Bishop Liutprand of Cremona, who was sent in the days of
the Ottos as ambassador to Byzantium, exemplifies this type of
nature study. He was shown an imperial zoological park in
which there was a herd of wild asses. The bishop immediately
began to excogitate what significance these wild donkeys might
have for the universe. A sibylline saying occurred to him :
" Lion and Cat shall conquer the Wild Ass." Liutprand first
thought that this indicated a joint victory of his master Otto I
and the Byzantine Emperor Nicephorus, over the Saracens.
Then it seemed, however, that the two equally potent monarchs
could not well be represented by the mighty lion and the little
cat, where upon a little further reflection the true interpreta
tion flashed on him : Lion and Cat were his masters Otto the
Great and his young son Otto II, while the wild ass whom they
should overcome, as was proved by the zoological garden, was
no other than the Emperor Nicephorus himself ! Thus Bishop
PSEUDO-ARISTOTLE 33?
Liutprand, one of the most learned of clerics, envisaged Nature.
And yet he was familiar with an immense number of ancient
authors : Cicero, Terence, Vegetius, Pliny, Lucretius, Boethius,
to name only a few, and to mention Ovid, Vergil, Horace not at
all. In these things the classics carried no weight ; people
got from them what they brought to them — a moral or an
adventure. Even the adventures that you experienced your
self you interpreted intellectually if you were sufficiently
learned. The letter of the Chancellor Conrad who describes
his Sicilian journey in which he had seen Scylla and Charybdis,
and the wonders of the Magician Vergil and the like, shows this
projection of the already-known on to the world of fact. In
the age of the Crusaders men's fantasy took colour from the
fabled animals and mythical beings of Ovid and Apuleius, the
tales of Alexander, the wanderings of Aeneas and Odysseus.
Gradually, however, from using their fancy men learned to
use their eyes.
It is remarkable what the ancients, who give to each age
according to its need, provided for the Middle Ages. It is
probably the only time they have been called on to waken men's
senses to magic and formlessness. The Middle Ages, fast
bound in forms and formulas, had enough and more than enough
of these. Men who received their real life from another world,
a life that revealed itself in unalterable forms which were holy,
and beautiful and eternal, had naught to do with transitory life
that expressed itself in its own forms. For them the ancients
needed to bring no new forms — they often produced effects
actually hostile to form — their mission was rather to awaken
and set free the hidden smouldering forces. The authors who,
among the ancients, had a message for those times were a
motley crew, to many of whom access nowadays is almost
barred. The favourite works were those innumerable pseudo-
Aristotelian writings which seek to make Aristotle ''more
comprehensible" by neo-platonic speculations. Men, un
accustomed to use their eyes, who were seeking the inner
meaning of things from the starting point not of life and man,
but of universal thought, could only find an approach to the
338 NEO-PLATONISTS v.3
ancients through such authors as made most appeal to the
mind and least to the eye, and for them the Arabs were the best
interpreters. The Arabs had sifted ancient literature with
but one end in view, and had transplanted everything purely
intellectual that would bear transplanting, but their minds
were entirely closed to anything that bore the special imprint
of Greek and Roman life. Not one single historian did they
take over, not one single poet ! What were the tragic drama
tists to them, the great lyricists ! What was Homer to them !
They only recognised one line of his as of any value :
el? KOL paves ecrTar ef? /3acrL\€u$.
On the other hand they had borrowed all the writings about
Natural Science and Medicine, and all the philosophers since
Alexander, and of the early philosophers only Plato *s Timaeus,
Phaedo and the Republic.
After the natural history writers the Neo-Platonists ap
pealed most to them, and in the neo-platonist version they
learned to know the great systematist Aristotle. Even to the
great Arab philosophers of the tenth and eleventh centuries,
al Kindi, al Farabi and Avicenna, Aristotle was only accessible
in the garbled neo-platonist disguise. The great interpreter
of the real Aristotle, the Spaniard Averroes, did not appear till
the twelfth century. One of the greatest achievements of this
great scholar was to reveal to the West in translation and with
commentaries a purer Aristotle, and to retranslate other ancient
authors from Arabic into western tongues. Averroes died in
the year which saw the four-year-old Frederick crowned King
of Naples in Palermo, though legend relates that he lived at the
court of Frederick.
Translations from the Arabic on an extensive scale began to
be made in the twelfth century principally, indeed almost
exclusively, in Spain in the school of Toledo, which in the
Middle Ages was accounted the headquarters of the magic
arts : astrology, necromancy, chiromancy, pyromancy and every
other sort of divination. North Italians like Gerard of Cremona
worked here alongside Spaniards like Dominicus Gundissali-
nus. About the turn of the century the first translations of
Averroes' works must have begun to issue from Toledo, and
TRANSLATIONS 339
along with them the physics and metaphysics of Aristotle. As
early as 1209 these works were forbidden by Pope Innocent
III. A second, but less important, collecting place for such
works was the Norman court of Palermo, the second entrance
gate of Eastern culture. Here men like Eugene of Palermo and
Admiral Henry Aristippus were at work, but, as far as is known,
the sole translation from the Arabic that here appeared was the
Optics of Ptolemy. Palermo was already far more important
as a link with Byzantium, and it was chiefly Greek works which
were there translated even into Latin : sayings of the Ery
thraean Sibyl, the Syntax of Ptolemy, the Optics as well as the
Elements of Euclid, the writings of Proclus, the Pneumatica of
Hero of Alexandria, the logical and meteorological works of
Aristotle, Plato's Meno and Phaedo, etc. Chalcidius' Latin
translation of the Timaeus and the never-lost translations by
Boethius of the Aristotelian Topica, Analytica and Categorica.
We may assume that Frederick was acquainted with the
majority of these works. It is also probable that through
his intimacy with the Saracens in Palermo he had learned in his
boyhood to know the scientific-philosophic writings of the
Arabs ; he certainly learned to know the Arab mind. In the
thirty years of Sicilian chaos which followed on the death of
the last Norman king the scholarly activities of the court came
to a standstill. Frederick II on every occasion renewed old
traditions, and on his return from Germany to his Sicilian
kingdom, still more on his return from the East, a period of
intellectual activity began at the imperial Court the results
of which no longer lagged behind those of Toledo. When
Constantinople was conquered by the Crusaders in 1204, and
a Latin Empire established there, the interest of Byzantium
decreased considerably and Greek studies began to be ousted
by Arabic. What the Emperor himself enjoyed at first hand
he now proceeded to interpret to the Western world through
his numerous scholars.
It was probably when Frederick II visited Bologna on his
coronation journey that he first met the most celebrated of all
the scholars of his later court : Michael Scot. Little is known
with certainty about the Scottish scholar's life. He began his
career at Toledo, where he translated the Spherics of Alpetra-
340 MICHAEL SCOT v. 3
gius in 1217. Three years later he appears in Bologna, then
was for some time in correspondence with the papal Curia,
which recommended him to the Archbishop of Canterbury,
and he probably came to Frederick about 1227. He had
probably made Frederick's acquaintance first at the same time
that the Emperor had made friends with the mathematician,
Leonardo of Pisa. Michael Scot, translator, astrologer, philo
sopher, mathematician and augur, was reckoned a wizard by his
age, and Dante consigns to Hell this master of magic and necro
mancy " practised in every slight of magic wile," and intro
duces him as a false prophet of the future with his head turned
backwards on his shoulders. Innumerable marvellous and
uncanny stories were current about him and the Emperor, and
can still be found in the novels and tales of the Romantics.
The shuddering awe which Frederick II inspired was shared
by his Court Astrologer, whom people called a " second
Apollo." They related that, knowing beforehand the manner
of his own death, he always wore an iron cap, and that in spite
of it he was killed by a falling stone, exactly as he had foretold.
His death probably occurred in 1235 as he was accompanying
the Emperor to Germany.
Michael Scot is credited with a considerably larger number
of writings than he actually produced. It is, however, certain
that he translated Aristotle's De Caelo and De Anima with the
commentaries of Averroes, and also the Aristotelian zoological
writings which Avicenna had grouped under the title of Liber
animalium : Historiae animalium, De partibus animalium, and
other treatises — nineteen books in all. This work was dedi
cated, like most of his others, to the Emperor. It introduced
the Aristotelian zoology for the first time to the West. Master
Henry of Cologne made a transcript of the Emperor's copy in
1232, and this may well have been the copy used by Albertus
Magnus. Translations of the Physics and Metaphysics were also
ascribed, probably incorrectly, to Michael Scot. His authorship
of some obscure philosophical treatises such as the Quaestiones
of Nicolas the Peripatetic and a Systematic Philosophy is more
probable.
Other Aristotelian writings were known at the Court : the
Nicomachaean Ethics, Rhetoric and Meteorology, and, decades
SCHOLARS 341
later, the Politics also. Pseudo- Aristotelian writings were on
the other hand even more numerous. King Manfred later
had the treatise De Porno translated into Latin (Frederick
had already had it translated into Hebrew) and presented the
Magna Moralia to the University of Paris. Frederick himself
quotes in his Falcon Book the pseudo-Aristotelian Mechanics.
The so-called Problemata, which a scholar staying in Greece had
translated from the Greek, were dedicated to the Emperor.
The so-called Theology or Trepl /SacnXe/a? of Aristotle was also
presumably familiar.
Another scholar, Master Theodore, prepared for the Em
peror extracts from the Secretum Secretorum which was also
ascribed to Aristotle. Master Theodore, like Michael Scot,
bore the title of Court Philosopher, and probably succeeded
to the latter's post at Court. He was later even granted a fief.
Michael Scot represented the spirit of Spain and Toledo, Theo
dore rather that of the Arab East. He probably came from
Antioch, was said to have studied in Baghdad and Mosul, and
had been sent to the Emperor in 1236 by the " Great Khalif,"
probably al Kamil of Egypt. He was not allowed to be idle :
in the course of a few months he was employed as astrologer
to cast the Emperor's horoscope ; as chancery clerk to conduct
correspondence with Arab rulers ; he was sent to Tunis as
ambassador ; as a scholar he was set to translate an Arabic
treatise, and, lastly — a less intellectual but not less important
employment — he had to prepare violet sweetmeats for the court,
some of which the Emperor sent to Piero della Vigna who
was sick.
Peter the Spaniard described himself in a medical treatise
as a pupil of Master Theodore. Nothing further is known
about him, nor about the two other men who are styled Court
Philosophers : Master John of Palermo and Master Dominicus,
probably a Spaniard. Almost all these court scholars main
tained close relations with the circle of Leonardo of Pisa, who
introduced the system of Arabic numerals to the West. We
know that Frederick II met this greatest of all medieval
mathematicians in Pisa and conversed with him at length.
Leonardo never actually entered the Emperor's service,
but he sent a revised version of his most important work,
342 ASTROLOGY v.3
the Abacus, to Michael Scot, referred to the "great philo
sopher " Master Theodore, and dedicated his Liber Quadra-
torum to the Emperor, who it seems had in earlier years com
pletely mastered the great mathematician's other writings. The
Sultan, al Kamil, had sent a mathematician and astronomer,
the learned al Hanifi, to the Emperor, for mathematics were
very highly valued by the Emperor personally. The court
scholars all found mathematics absolutely indispensable for
their astronomical and astrological calculations.
The immense importance of astrology for this century is
rarely appreciated. A hard and fast conception of " Time "
prevailed, and to astrology fell the task of determining the
right moment, the feeling for which was imperfectly developed
or had been undermined by a belief in Providence. Hers also
was the task of proving directly from an eternal source, the
metaphysical necessity of a given event's happening at a given
moment. There was as yet no room for the conception that
events themselves bring their own moment with them and
that the event gives the moment its eternal significance. Even
Dante assured himself of the position of the planets at the
time of every important occurrence, thus linking time with
eternity. In this his position was akin to Michael Scot's,
who declared: "The heavenly bodies are not the cause
of events, but the sign thereof, as the compasses in front of
the tavern are the sign that wine is within."
Astronomy and astrology played an important part in court
life. One of the sultans had sent Frederick that costly
astrolabe which, with his son and heir Conrad, was the thing
dearest to him on earth. The Egyptian Sultan sent as a gift
an Arab work on astrology, the Book of the Nine Judges. His
son Manfred later had the Centiloquium of Hermes translated,
another astrological work ; and, finally, Michael Scot in his
Liber Introductorius and his Liber Particularis compiled a
wonderful encyclopaedia of the collective astronomical and
astrological knowledge of his time. Michael, not undeservedly,
ranked as THE ASTROLOGER of the Middle Ages, and the Italian
towns were swamped with spurious prophecies supposed to
emanate from him.
Wherever the Emperor appeared he was accompanied by a
FREDERICK'S SCEPTICISM 343
number of his astrologers, and there was nothing the Italian
princes were so ready to learn from him as the use of the
astrological art. How far Frederick really believed in his star-
gazers remains a question. Though he frequently inquired
what would be the propitious moment for a certain weighty
enterprise, the founding of a city or the start of a campaign,
he may very well have reflected, like the Renaissance princes,
that if the stars cannot lie the astrologers can. He puts them
again and again to the test. Michael Scot had recommended :
" When you seek advice from a wise man, consult him by
a waxing moon," and had also adjured him to be mindful of
the ancient medical maxim to avoid blood-letting when the
moon is in the sign of the Twins. The Emperor wanted to
prove him a liar, and sent for the surgeon on a forbidden day.
The blood-letting went off successfully, but when all was over
the surgeon accidentally dropped his lancet and pierced the
Emperor's foot. For several days the swelling caused him
extreme pain. Another time Frederick asked his astrologer
how far the sky was from the palace. Whatever this exactly
meant, Michael Scot promptly calculated the distance. The
Emperor sent him away and had the floor of the room or court
yard of his palace sunk a hand's breadth, and when Michael
returned requested him to reckon out the distance once again,
His calculation at once revealed that either the sky had moved
a hand's breath further off or else the palace had sunk. These
anecdotes are characteristic of Frederick, and manifest his
scepticism not towards things but towards people. His
astrologers, like his " harem/* must often have simply formed
part of his wise en scene. Mystery, like magnificence, was tc
contribute its quota to the impression he created.
The Hebrew scholars of Spain and of Provence with whon
Frederick established relations, or whom he even brought t<
court, contributed rather to the astronomical and philosophica
than to the astrological interests of the court. Through then
he became acquainted with Jewish philosophy, which then ha<
reached its zenith with Maimonides. Frederick was said t
be able to express himself orally in nine languages and to writ
344 HEBREW LEARNING v.3
seven ; it is quite probable that among them he knew Hebrew.
He certainly had numerous works translated into Hebrew. At
the age of eighteen Juda ben. Salomon Cohen came to his court,
and there compiled an Encyclopaedia on the works of Aris
totle, Euclid, Ptolemy and the Spaniard Alpetronius. A Jew is
mentioned as secretary to Michael Scot ; it was the custom
in Spain for Jews to collaborate with Latinists in translations
from the Arabic. Jacob ben Abbamari, who translated five
books of the Logic of Aristotle with the Isagoge of Porphyry
and the commentaries of Averroes, came from Provence. He
prepared a Hebrew translation of Ptolemy in Naples, and trans
lated al Fargani's Elements of Astronomy into Hebrew. These
translations are dedicated to the Emperor, and express the
hope that under Frederick " this friend of wisdom who main
tains me," the Messiah, may appear. This wish was not mere
rhetoric, for the year 1240 was, according to Hebrew chronology
the year 5,000, and people were looking for the coming of the
Messiah. Frederick II was held in such high repute by the
Jews that in a Hebrew Mirror of Manners anecdotes and sayings
of his are recorded as models, alongside those of Aristotle,
Alexander the Great, Porphyry and Theophrastus.
Frederick was introduced to the works of Maimonides, who
died in 1205, by another scholar, Moses ben Salomon from
Salerno, who had written a commentary on the Guide of the
Perplexed. Other works of this great Aristotelian were known
to the Emperor, and some of his conversations prove that he
knew them intimately. The talk turned on Maimonides one
day, and his chief work was stated to be his Interpretation of
the Old Testament and of the Talmud. The Emperor remarked
that he missed in it any explanation of the origin of the curious
Jewish ritual according to which the ashes of a red cow were
potent for purification. For his part he believed the rite had
its origin in India, where a red iion was burnt for a similar
purpose, as he had read in the Book of Indian Sages. The
Lawgiver Moses, reflecting on the great danger involved in
catching a lion, had substituted a cow as a burnt-offering
for the Jews. Possibly astrological considerations might have
had something to do with it, which would be akin to those of
Egyptian magicians and conjurers of spirits ! Another time
REPUBLIC OF SCHOLARS 345
they were discussing why, according to Bible precept, only
domestic animals, never wild animals, were offered as sacrifices,
whereupon the Emperor gave as his explanation that sacrifices
are, as it were, gifts to heaven, and a man can only give his own
property, not the free beast of the field that belongs to none.
It is suggestive to note how, in this " republic of scholars,"
each knew the other and all mutually assisted each other in
work. The Jew, Jacob ben Abbamari, was a friend of Michael
Scot and often appealed to him. He had leagued himself with
the Scot, he writes, and received many learned suggestions
from him about various Bible passages, mainly connected with
questions of natural science. Moses ben Salomon of Salerno
again conducted learned conversations with Margrave Berthold
of Hohenburg, who in 1240 was a page in the Emperor's
service, and to whom, later, young Manfred was entrusted. So
it is clear that the scientific curiosity of the court infected
the young nobles also. Another courtier questioned the Jew,
Jehuda ben Salomon, about the construction of five bodies
from a given sphere and was directed to Euclid. The Hebrew
scholar from Salerno disputed with Peter of Ireland, the famous
teacher at the University of Naples, who afterwards held an
extraordinarily learned conversation about most varied topics
with Manfred and his friends.
This Renaissance-like "Academy," with its head the Empe
ror as primus inter pares, demonstrated how the free human
mind, bridging all gulfs of race, religion and rank, acted as a
levelling agency in the secular world just as — in a quite different
direction — the faith of the Church acted in the spiritual world.
In his Charter, drawn up on the foundation of the University
of Naples, and modelled in many of its features on that of
Bologna, the Emperor had pointed to the uniting action of the
mind. The proffered gifts of learning bring nobility and pos
sessions in their train which make the affections and gracious-
ness of friendship flourish. To characterise the free human
spirit as friendship-building struck a new and humanistic note,
which indicated that the clerical spirit had already been con
quered. A new power was dawning here, and the Emperor
valued on that account scholars and learned men who, as a
courtier writes, " inhabit the circle of the earth from sea to
346 DAWN OF RENAISSANCE v.3
sea/' When Frederick sent to the teachers and scholars of
Bologna the manuscript of a treatise of Aristotle on logic and
mathematics, which with other manuscripts filled the coffers
of his treasuries and which he had found again in pursuing his
linguistic and mathematical studies, he wrote in the covering
letter : " The recipients should accept these writings gratefully
as a gift of their friend the Emperor . . . amicicaesaris" They
would know how to use them and " to draw new water out of
the ancient well."
This is the happiest interpretation of the learned activity of
the dawning Renaissance at the Hohenstaufen court. With the
high value attached to everything intellectual a new problem
presented itself to the court circle, one which had occupied
men's minds since the troubadour days began, and the stirrings
of unfettered secular thought : what is the true nobility
amongst men ? Nobility of race or of the spirit ? The ques
tion was debated with quite peculiar zest at the Emperor's
court, where town-bred scholars and lawyers worked in common
with knightly and aristocratic officials, and mixed with and
argued with Christian, Jewish and Muslim philosophers. On
one occasion the courtiers turned to Piero della Vigna and
Thaddeus of Suessa, the two High Court Judges, and requested
them to decide it. The reply may have been given in the
Emperor's own quotation from Aristotle. Nobility consists in
ancient possessions wedded with noble conduct. Frederick
expressed himself on similar lines in his foundation charter
of Naples. To him, himself the grandson of emperors and
kings, nobility of mind apart from nobility of race was incon
ceivable, and Dante took the same position in his De Monarchia.
In his Convivio it is true he had sought to demonstrate the
emptiness of " ancient possessions," and in his great educa
tional treatise and the canzones that accompany it he had taken
Frederick IFs maxim, as a text only to refute it, although he
styled the Emperor " a great logician and a great scholar."
However much people might dispute over the definition, the
fusion of an aristocracy of blood and an aristocracy of brain
had already been realised at the imperial court.
PHILOSOPHIC SPECULATION 347
A conversation of King Manfred and his friend with
Peter of Ireland has just been mentioned. Though it took
place ten years after Frederick's death this conversation
vividly reveals the type of question which occupied the court.
The problem is the significant one : of a " purpose in Nature."
Are the limbs present because of the functions they perform,
or are the functions the result of the limbs, or, more exactly—
someone may have asked — are the claws of the vulture, the fangs
of the wolf, the teeth of the lion, provided by nature to tear
other animals to death ? A devilish question, full of pitfalls.
For if it is answered in the affirmative, that implies that Nature
recognises the principle of destruction — recognises evil — that
this is the will of nature, the will of God. According to this
theory Providence would not be aiming at the " Good " in the
Christian sense, and that hoped-for dispensation where lion
and lamb would play together in the fields of Paradise would
no longer be the order of the world as willed by Nature and
by God. That is conceivable enough ... for every statesman
would feel a sabbath fraternisation of all animals, and the
equalisation of all created things a hideous disorder, not least
Frederick II himself who always pictured Adam as the " King."
The Emperor held very strong views about the due obser
vance of rank and precedence even in the animal world. An
anecdote illustrates this : he loosed one day a favourite falcon,
" whom he loved more than a city," on a crane. The falcon
rose and was above the crane, when far below he spied an
eaglet, stooped and slew it. When the Emperor saw this he
wrathfully summoned a justiciar and had his favourite falcon
beheaded perk' avea morto lo suo signiore, because he had killed
an animal of higher rank than himself and his master, a young
eagle, king of the birds ! This does not stultify Frederick's
dream of bringing in the " golden age." He dreamt not of
listless peace, idyllic absence of desire, but the tension of
supreme control and discipline, under which the lion would
if necessary abstain from devouring the adjacent rabbit.
Such was the Emperor's vision of a Paradise in which he could
then himself relax.
Peter of Ireland rejected the dangerous enquiry whether
claws and fangs were created for the rending of other animals.
348 IBN SABIN v.3
He added : " The secret potency of this question has led many
to recognise two principles in everything, the principle of evil
and the principle of good. This, however, is heresy and bad
taste to boot." He directs attention instead to the necessity
inherent in matter which provides for everything that is
necessary. The learned man may have had more particularly
in mind the spreading heresy of Neo-Manichaeism. Every
where sects of devil worshippers were springing up, amongst
them the Luciferians, who were said tq maintain that God
had unjustly condemned Satan to Hell — for Satan was the true
Creator of all things.
Another set of problems — indirectly suggested by Aristotle —
are touched on in a talk of the Emperor's about the inter
pretation of a passage in the Bible. They were discussing
why Maimonides had described earthly matter as snow. The
Emperor opined : because white takes every other colour
readily, as matter takes the form imposed on it. Snow is,
therefore, a symbol of the malleability of matter. The moulding
of matter was a subject frequently present to the Emperor's
mind. It is touched on in the preface to the Book of Laws,
where God is presented not as the Creator but as the Moulder
of pre-existent matter. This problem was interrelated with
another: Whether the World, as Aristotle taught, existed
" from eternity " or whether it had been created by God.
Frederick sought light on these and other metaphysical ques
tions from the learned men of Islam — on certain discrepancies
between Aristotle and his commentator Alexander of Aphro-
disias (whom the Emperor therefore also knew) . The Emperor
despatched his queries to Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Asia Minor,
Yemen. Ultimately, through the medium of the Sultan of the
Almohades, they reached Ibn Sabin, a Moroccan scholar in
Ceuta, who, as he himself writes, " smilingly undertook to
answer the Emperor." He refused to accept Frederick's
numerous gifts ; he intended thereby to bring home his in
significance to the Christian Emperor, " to the triumph of
Islam." His answers themselves did so too. The Emperor
had asked, amongst other things, " What is the proof of the
immortality of the soul, and is her existence eternal ? " Where
upon Ibn Sabin, in most mysterious language, gave the Emperor
SEARCH FOR KNOWLEDGE 349
to understand that he did not even know how to formulate a
question correctly. " O prince, thou who seekest truth," he
wrote, " thou hast posed thy question about the nature of the
soul without exactly indicating what type of soul is the object of
thy questioning. Thou hast thus neglected the essential and
hast regrettably confused many things which should have been
treated separately. It is thine inexperience in treating of
speculative matters and instituting enquiries in an independent
branch of science which has led thee into such confusion.
Hadst thou but known the number of separate types which are
comprised under the one word £ soul ' ! Hadst thou but been
acquainted with Dialectics and the manner of distinguishing
the Finite from the Infinite, between the Particular and the
General, between the conceptions of ambiguous homonyms and
that which is consecrated by the terminology of speech ! — thou
wouldest never have so phrased thy question. For when thou
askest : * What is the proof for the immortality of the soul ? '
thy question may be understood to apply to the vegetable soul,
the animal soul, the rational soul, the soul of wisdom, the soul of
prophecy. To which of these souls does thy question apply ? "
Ibn Sabin continues in this strain, proud of his immense
knowledge and powers of hair-splitting and incapable of giving
a real answer. He writes a separate dissertation on each type
of soul and explains his position with regard to Plato and Moses,
Avicenna and the Brahmins; finally, in a feeble anti-climax
maintaining that Islam is the only true religion. There was
a certain value in all this harangue, the reference, for instance,
to the teaching of the Brahmins. Much of Frederick's know
ledge about India must have reached him in this sort of way.
It was not merely as an intellectual pastime that Frederick
directed such questions to learned men. He was seeking
proofs for the lightness of his own way of life, and he often
established such proofs by violent and remarkable methods.
To prove the mortality of the soul he had a man imprisoned in
a perfectly tight-fitting wine vat and left to perish, to demon
strate that the soul which could not escape from the vat must
have perished with the body : such at least is the tale. Maimo-
nides to a certain extent encouraged this type of speculation in
so far as he, like the Averroists, though on other grounds,
350 LEARNED CORRESPONDENCE v.3
denied any general immortality, and only accorded immortality
to the truly wise. Frederick's correspondence with oriental
scholars was certainly not all so fruitless as that with Ibn
Sabin of Ceuta. We learn from the Arabs themselves that
Frederick sent astronomical and geometrical questions to
Mosul, one of which, for instance, was to construct a quadri
lateral of the same superficial area as a segment of a given circle.
Books were even exchanged. The Emperor made a collection
of the prophecies of Merlin and had it translated into Arabic
for the Sultan of Egypt, and he himself received from Tunis
the novel Sidrach and the Book of all Knowledge. Envoys of
the Emperor, remarking the immense wisdom of the Ruler of
Tunis, and learning that he owed it to Sidrach, called Frede
rick's attention to this work. The Emperor at once begged
permission to have a copy made of this book, which in the form
of question and answer deals with every sphere of heaven and
of earth. Much of it must have stimulated the Emperor to
further questioning.
This impulse to inquire was Frederick's most dangerous
quality, for he had a gift of dissolving fast-frozen axioms by a
casual question. As he once sought to undermine the spiritual
basis of papal rule by the maliciously-innocent enquiry whether
Pope Gregory, like himself the Hohenstaufen, could trace his
claims back through his father and grandfather. He attacked
the very roots of medieval faith by a series of trustful, innocent-
sounding questions addressed on occasion to Michael Scot.
Michael Scot in his encyclopaedia relates as follows :
" Once, when Frederick, Emperor of Rome, the ever-
illustrious, had reflected long in accordance with the order
he had himself established on the differences of the whole
earth, what they are and how they appear on, over, in and under
the earth, he then sent secretly for me, Michael the Scot, the
most faithful of his astrologers, and laid a number of questions
before me, secretly, as it pleased him to do, about the founda
tions of earth and the marvels thereof, speaking as follows :
* My dearest Master, we have often and in divers ways heard
question and answer from one and another about the heavenly
OBSTINATE QUESTIONINGS 351
bodies, about sun and moon and the fixed stars, about the
elements, the world soul, about heathen and Christian peoples
and other created things that exist on and in the earth, such as
plants and metals. Yet we have heard naught of those secrets
which delight the mind that is wedded to wisdom : about Para
dise, Purgatory, Hell, the foundations and the wonders of the
world. Therefore we beg thee by thy love of wisdom and thy
loyalty to our throne to explain to us the structure of the earth.
How is the earth fastened above the abyss of space ?
And how is this abyss fastened beneath the earth ?
Is there aught else that bears the earth save air and water ?
Or does the earth stand fast of itself ?
Or does it rest on the heavens below it ?
And how many heavens are there ?
Who is their director ?
Who mainly inhabit the heavens ?
How far is one heaven distant from another by our measure ?
And if there be many heavens what is there out beyond the last ?
By how much is one heaven greater than another ?
In which heaven is God Substance, that is in his divine majesty,
and in what wise doth he sit upon the throne of heaven ?
And in what wise is he accompanied by the angels and the saints ?
And what do the angels and the saints do uninterruptedly in the
presence of God ?
Likewise tell us : How many Hells are there ?
Who are the spirits who dwell in them ?
And by what names are they called ?
Where is Hell, and Purgatory where ?
And where the Heavenly Paradise ? Under the earth ? Over the
earth ? In the earth ?
And what is the difference between the souls who go to Hell and
the spirits which fell from Heaven ? And how many torments
are there in Hell ?
And does one soul know another in the next life ? And can a
soul return to this life to speak or to show itself to anyone ?
And what of this : that when the soul of a living man passes over
into that other life, naught can give it power to return, neither
first love nor even HATE as if naught had ever happened ? Or
does it seem that the soul careth naught for what is left behind,
whether it be blessed or whether it be damned ? ' "
These questions at once recall the apparently similar ques
tions of the Scholastics ; but theirs are mostly pure mental
352 LINGUISTIC EXPERIMENT v. 3
gymnastics of this type : how would mankind have spread over
the earth according to God's wish if there had been no Fall ?
or whether at the Resurrection the toothless will again grow
teeth and the bald grow hair ? Frederick II, however, asks
about the appearance of that other world. He directs the
same practical curiosity to the conditions of that other world
as dictated his questions to the messengers of Muslim princes
about the conditions of their various foreign countries. The
kingdom of God was for him just such another. The thought
of the future life, which disturbed Frederick's contemporaries
to the core and hunted terrified men to penances and flagel
lations, was to Frederick in the most amazing way simply an
innocent object of knowledge and "a delight of the mind."
He inquires because the tectonics of the world-structure seems
to him immeasurably interesting ; he longs to know just how
God sits upon his throne, because he must sit in like fashion ;
it is unquestionably useful to him as a judge to know the punish
ments of Hell ; and the statesman in him enquires for practical
reasons about the precedence of saints, angels and spirits.
Mysticism is entirely foreign to this method of approach,
which seeks objective representation. There is not a trace
of any personal, emotional interest, nor in the imperial soul
the faintest shadow of anxiety. Eternal bliss, everlasting
contemplation of God offer no allurements : " What do the
angels do uninterruptedly in the presence of God ? " That
other question, whether a return to this life is not possible " not
even for hate," corresponds to the Emperor's saying on the
defection of a certain town : " If I had one foot in Paradise
I would withdraw it to take vengeance on Viterbo ! " Dante
answered all these questions soberly and practically too, but
interested in every fibre in that world which he never ceased
to picture tangibly and visibly to himself day and night. His
questions are often the same as Frederick's.
People tell of Frederick II, himself the master of so many
tongues, that he was anxious to discover by research what the
primeval human speech had been. He, therefore, had a number
of infants reared by nurses who were most strictly forbidden
to speak to them. " He wanted to discover whether the chil
dren could speak Hebrew, or Greek, or Latin, or Arabic as the
MUCH MARVELLING 353
original of all languages, or whether they would speak the
speech of their parents who had borne them." The experiment
failed, for the children died. This problem also attracted
Dante, who deals with it in his treatise on popular speech.
Dante also, in another little essay, de Aqua et terra, discusses
just such hydrological phenomena as Frederick II had cross-
examined Michael Scot about. " How does it come/' asked
the Emperor, " that sea-water is so salt, and that in many
places far from the sea salt water is found and in other places
sweet water, although they all derive from the living sea ?
And how comes it that sweet waters are often spewed out by
the earth and often drop from stones and trees, like grape vines
when they are cut in spring ? And how is it that many waters
are sweet and mild and sparkling clear, and many are wild and
others again viscous and thick ? We marvel much about all
these things although we know long since that all waters come
from the sea and that they flow through lands and caves of many
kinds, returning to the sea which is the bed and womb of all the
streaming waters/* Dante and his age shared this conception
of the unity of all earthly waters.
This " much marvelling " of the Emperor's is the vital
point. Things which for centuries everybody had seen and
accepted as facts challenged him to curious enquiry. When
he was staying at a place like Pozzuoli or Montepulciano he
immediately wanted to know all about the remarkable springs.
" Where do the salt and bitter springs come from, which in
many places gush forth with violence, and the foul-smelling
waters which are found in many baths and pools. Do they
spring up themselves ? Do they come from elsewhere ? And
those waters which in some places are hot or at least very warm
and sometimes even boiling as if they had been in a vessel over a
fire ? Has the earth a hole in its centre, or is it a solid body
like a living stone ? " The world was, as it were, a new discovery
to him fraught with questions. He must have observed the
winds on his crusading voyage : " Whence comes the wind
which blows from different parts of the circle of the earth ? "
He probably means the regular wind-currents. Volcanoes are
another subject of inquiry : " Whence comes the fire which the
earth vomits forth both out of plains and mountain tops ?
354 MAGNETIC NEEDLE v. 3
Smoke too appears now there, now here. Where is it generated
and what causes it to burst forth ? We see it in many parts of
Sicily and near Messina, as in Etna, Vesuvius, the Lipari
islands and Stromboli." He is probably thinking of sub
marine volcanoes when he asks : " How does it come that
such flaming fire appears to issue not only from the earth but
in many parts of the Indian Sea ? "
Other things that occupied the Emperor's mind were the
secret forces inherent in matter, in things themselves, forces
which Frederick II was so skilful in liberating in his State.
He had a particular love for precious stones that was not
unconnected with their magic properties, and he would pur
chase them even when the treasury was exhausted. Prester
John was said to have given him wonderful stones ; and he
was brought the legendary jewels from the crown of the
Babylonian dragon which a fisherman had found. He was inti
mately acquainted with the magnetic needle and its mysterious
power, that wonderful instrument of which Brunette Latini
wrote at the end of the century to Guido Cavalcanti : " The
seafarer can steer correctly thanks to this magnet, but for the
present he must use it secretly . . . for no shipmaster would dare
to employ him lest he be suspected of witchcraft. Sailors
would refuse to serve on the ship if they knew that their captain
had in his possession such inventions of the devil." Michael
Scot had minutely instructed the Emperor about the different
properties of minerals and metals, a lore which verged on
alchemy, an art by no means unknown at court. He learned, for
instance, that quicksilver, the wonderful argentum vivum, makes
a man deaf if dropped into his ear. He also got Michael
Scot to teach him the properties of herbs and drugs (the
Botany of Dioscorides was known in Sicily) and the wonderful
qualities of lakes and rivers, and he sent special messengers
to Norway to investigate the petrifying properties of a certain
spring.
Frederick's great resource in all his questionings was the
enormous work of Michael Scot, which was not only an
astronomical, astrological encyclopaedia, but a compendium of
UNIVERSAL KNOWLEDGE 355
all the secret sciences. It was based in many points on danger
ous sources, a Liber perditionis animae et corporis for instance,
which contained the names, dwelling-places and powers of the
demons, and the Liber auguriorum of which Michael Scot
(otherwise a most obedient son of the Church) writes that
he has seen and owned the book although the Roman Church
had banned it. His work does not neglect the symbolism of
numbers and their mystic values : the number seven rules the
world, for seven is the number of the planets, metals, arts,
colours, tones and smells. Everywhere we detect him striving
to relate everything in the Cosmos according to law to every
thing else. Michael Scot treats of the music of the spheres and
expounds en passant the old musical doctrines of Boethius, and
the newer ones of Guido of Arezzo ; on another occasion he
explains the calendar. His immense astrological and astro
nomical knowledge he owes not only to the Almagest and to al
Fargani, but much also to the ancients, to the obscure Scholia
of Germanicus, for instance, in which again Nigidius and Ful-
gentius, Hyginus, Pliny, Martianus Capella and Aratus are
included. Michael Scot took over the star pictures of the
ancient Scholia, and these astrological figures of Mars and
Jupiter, the Archer and the Centaur, which followed the
ancient representations, exercised in their turn an influence on
Renaissance painting, as can be demonstrated from Giotto's
frescoes at Padua. For his astrology Michael Scot draws
largely on the Arabs, above all on Albumazar in whom more
ancient works were collected, Hermes, Dorotheus, the Baby
lonian Teucer and also Indians and Persians. In short, at the
imperial court all the superstitions of the late Roman empire, a
prey as it had been to the stream of oriental influences, came to
life again, just as Gnostic teaching reawakened amongst the
heretics of this same period.
Frederick knew all these things, or had learned in conversa
tion all that was worth knowing about them. " O fortunate
Emperor!" — wrote Michael Scot — "I verily believe if ever
a man in this world could escape death by his learning, thou
wouldest be the one. . . ." Frederick's knowledge must have
been stupendous. His mind enbraced every line of culture in
the contemporary world : Spanish, Proven9al, French, Roman,
356 STUPOR MUNDI v. .3
Italian, Arab, Greek and Jew. Add to this his knowledge
of tongues, of jurisprudence, of ancient literature, of Roman
educational literature and the literature of Scholasticism, whose
methods were entirely familiar to him as his Falcon Book,
shows. His contemporaries, amazed and fearful, called him
STUPOR MUNDI.
More admirable even than the fulness of his knowledge was
the fact that with it all the Emperor never for a moment lost
his clarity of vision. Even in scientific matters he knew exactly
what things were of importance for research. He was himself
at home in the mysterious twilight of the prophets and star-
gazers and could not value their sphere too highly as, in a cer
tain sense, a training ground. His own aims, however, were
far too simple and straightforward to be understood by any
of these over-learned folk. He depended only on first hand
ocular observation. " No certainty comes by hearsay " was
one of his maxims. He acted up to it. To let people know
the Emperor's methods he once sent mutilated and blinded
conspirators on a tour of all countries, for " the sight of the eyes
makes more impression on men than the hearing of the ear."
He by no means despised the mental training that served to
sharpen the sight. An Arab scholar Shahabu 'd Din has
preserved in an essay on Optics : Attentive Observation of
What the Eye Perceives, some questions of the Emperor's.
He asked why Canopus looked larger at his rising than at his
zenith ; why eyes afflicted with cataract could see black
streaks and spots ; why a lance plunged in water should appear
broken. Deceptions of the eye had a disturbing importance
for the man who relied preponderantly on visual observation.
The sense in which Frederick believed that knowledge was
dependent on seeing is clear from his laws about doctors. The
Constitutions of Melfi lay down : " Since the science of medi
cine cannot be mastered without a preliminary knowledge of
logic, we command that none shall study medicine who has not
first studied logic for at least three years." All medical stu
dents of Salerno were obliged to devote five years to reading
Hippocrates and Galen concurrently with their surgical and
anatomical studies, for the purposes of which corpses were on
occasion placed at their disposal. After they had passed their
PASSIONATE CURIOSITY 357
examination the Emperor did not grant them an appointment
as doctor until " they had practised for a full year beside an
experienced physician." After that they became state officials.
The apothecaries were also state officials, and were obliged to
study physics for one year. The Emperor himself had a very
exact knowledge of anatomy, both animal and human, and of
medicine. The Arabs had a great admiration for his medical
knowledge, and he quotes Hippocrates in his Falcon Book.
Michael Scot wrote a medical treatise, so also did Master Theo
dore, who, when he was instructed to work out a new scheme of
dietetics, wrote to the Emperor : " Your Majesty has commanded
me to prescribe certain rules for the preservation of your health
. . . but you are long since in possession of that most ancient
letter from the " Secrets " of Aristotle, which he sent to the
Emperor Alexander when the latter asked to be instructed
about the health of the body. All that your Majesty desires
to know is completely contained in that letter." A certain
Adam of Cremona also worked out medical instructions for the
Emperor. And in Italy for many a day powders, prescrip
tions and healing lotions passed under Frederick's name. In
addition to anatomy and medicine the Emperor sought to
master the science of human physiognomy. At his request
Michael Scot compiled from Arab-Hellenistic sources an essay
on Physiognomies which forms the third part of his great Hand
book. In the dedication he assures the Emperor that with this
knowledge in mind a ruler may know the vices and virtues of
his entourage as surely as if he were himself in their skins.
Slowly people were progressing from mental blinking to
physical seeing. Seeing, observing, exploring and researching
into Nature and her laws became a passion with Frederick II.
The innumerable anecdotes, the countless questions all betray
the same craving to explore the living newly-discovered world,
all disclose the same passionate curiosity concerning the laws
of cause and effect, the how and the why of every sort of life.
He shares this passion for knowledge, this curiosity, with
Leonardo da Vinci, to whom Nietzsche compares him : he at
the beginning, Leonardo at the end of the same epoch. Where
mere observation was insufficient Frederick II proceeded to
scientific experiment, which, like every attempt at experiment,
358 RESEARCH METHODS v. 3
seemed to the Middle Ages abhorrent or insane. They tell
that he was anxious to discover which of two men had better
digested his food, the one who had rested after his meal or the
other who had taken exercise : he cut them open to see. To
ascertain the length of a fish's life Frederick inserted a copper
ring in a carp's fin and set it free. The story of the " Diver "
is told about Frederick. He made the man dive into the Faro
to learn about sea animals and plants. He organised the most
original experiments on his Apulian estates, where he bred
horses and sought to improve the breed by importing Barbary
mares. In Malta he established a camel-breeding station, not
to mention his breeding of hounds, poultry and pigeons. To
study the chick's emergence from the egg, the embryo's
position in the egg, etc., he built artificial incubating ovens.
Having heard that ostrich eggs are hatched by the sun in hot
sand he procured ostrich eggs from al Kamil and experienced
people along with them, and tried to hatch them out in the
heat of the Apulian summer. Al Kamil also sent him Indian
cockatoos and pelicans, in return for which Frederick sent him
presents of white peacocks and a polar bear. He tried to
determine whether birds of prey detect their quarry by sight or
smell. " We have often experimented in various ways. For
when the falcons are completely blinded (by stitching the eye
lids) they do not even detect the meat that is thrown to them,
though nothing impedes their power of smell." He was the
first to institute systematic cultivation of game ; he established
close seasons, based on an accurate observation of the times of
pairing and breeding, for which the animals of Apulia were
supposed to have written him a letter of thanks. He had
animal reservations in various parts of his kingdom, and the
larger part of his menagerie, when not in actual attendance on
him, was kept in Lucera. On occasion he would divide a
number of captured cranes among his various castles. His
large vivarium was symbolical. Close to Foggia he had a big
marsh laid out with ponds and walled water-conduits which
was alive with all descriptions of waterfowl. A fantastic
picture — the great palace with its columns of marble and
serpentine, with bronze and marble statues, the Emperor within
attended by Moorish slaves and noble pages, visiting his pools
"DE ARTE VENANDI CUM AVIBUS" 359
to study pelicans, cranes, herons, wild geese and exotic marsh
fowl!
All these instincts of his culminated in his passion for the
chase which cost him the gravest defeat of his career — before
the walls of Parma. For Frederick's ancestors the chase had
been a peacetime substitute for war ; for Frederick it was more,
it was an art " entirely born of love " (totum procedit ex amore),
an intellectual exercise on a par with his natural science studies.
Only hawking, of course. The charm lay in the mysterious
power of the falconer over the freest, most elusive of all
birds — the eagle, the buzzard, the falcon. When six, eight,
or even ten falcons circled free in the air, almost out of sight
and yet bound as it were by some invisible thread, compelled
by some mysterious power that brought them with infallible
certainty back to the falconer's wrist, scorning the proffered
liberty, it was not only an exciting marvel, it was for Frederick
the neplus ultra of perfect discipline. The discipline Frederick
would have liked to see equally developed in man.
He despised the hunter who hunted with snares or nets or
quadrupeds. The noble sport was hawking, because it is an
art that can only be learnt from a teacher. " Hence it comes
that while many men of noble birth learn the art, the unedu
cated rarely do so. Hounds and hunting-leopards can be tamed
by force, falcons can only be caught and trained by human
skill. Hence a man learns more of the secrets of nature from
hawking than from other kinds of hunting/' thus Frederick
writes in his Book of Falconry. This saying of his explains
why, after the decay of hawking, intellectual monarchs like
Frederick the Great or Napoleon had no love for the chase.
It is also the revelation of what Frederick sought in the chase :
the secret workings of nature.
Frederick's great work is the product of years of observation :
de Arte venandi cum avibus. " Thanks to his amazingly
penetrative glance, directed especially to the observation of
nature, the Imperator himself wrote a book about the nature
and care of birds, in which he showed how deeply imbued he
was with a love of knowledge," wrote a chronicler. This
360 FALCON BOOK v. 3
comprehensive zoological treatise is anything but the superficial
indulgence of a princely caprice. Down to the minutest detail
it is based on his own observations or those which friends and
experts had made at his instigation. For twenty or thirty years
the Emperor had meditated the writing of this Ornithology — for
it is no less — and all the time he had been amassing first-hand
material till at last, urged by his son Manfred, he set about the
actual task of writing the six books in this branch of Zoology.
" He must be reckoned the greatest expert who ever lived,"
so judged Ranke. And the statement is not unjustified. In
the most vital points the book has not even yet been superseded.
The most astonishing thing about it is its absolute accuracy
and matter-of-factness, which contains more knowledge of the
mysteries of nature than do the cosmic astral encyclopaedias
of the court philosophers at which the Emperor was wont to
smile, even though on occasion he participated in the current
superstitions. In that age of intellectual starvation, which
speculated how many angels could dance on the point of a
needle, Frederick summed up his programme in the injroduc-
tion in the clear-cut phrase : " Our intention is to set forth the
things which are, as they are (manifestare ea quae sunt sicut sunt) . ' '
This stern sobriety, that seeks nothing before things or behind
things, but the things themselves, when exercised by a wise
man, contains the vision of all visions. Everything is, first
and foremost, itself. Neither the philosophers of the East nor
the philosophers of the West had taught this to Frederick.
We reflect that, a century ago, when the rest of Germany was
celebrating orgies of emotion and philosophy, many a one
quitted Weimar in disillusionment because there everyone was
" busy counting the legs of cockchafers."
The Emperor's book Concerning the Art of Hunting with Birds
contains far more than its title promises. The first part is a
general survey of birds, a classification of species, their habits,
their breeding, their feeding, their distribution, their methods
of nesting. The migration of birds is described in detail,
their skeletal structure, the organs and their functions ; every
detail of the plumage, the number and position of the wing
feathers, the flight itself ; in what relation the hardness of the
wing feathers stands to the frequency of the wing beat. It is
HEARSAY EVIDENCE 361
surprising to note that here Frederick seeks explanation in the
various works known to him, and refers, for instance, to the
pseudo-Aristotelian Mechanics. Each beat of the wing, we
learn, moves through a segment of a circle, in which movement
the outer feather describe the largest circle. According to the
laws of the Mechanics the larger roller lifts the greater weight.
Since the outer feathers have the greatest burden to support
and the greatest circle to describe they are correspondingly
stronger in build, and the hardness of the feathers decreases in
given proportions.
In the second of the six books the Emperor talks of the
different types of hunting falcons, their capture, their training,
their temporary blinding, by sewing the lids, the way to carry
them and the way to cast them. Frederick used to get falcons
sent or fetched from all corners of the earth. He once took a
condemned criminal and sent him down into an abyss to fetch
the nest of a white falcon. When he speaks of the birds of prey
which were sent to him from Spain and Bulgaria, the Near
East and India, Britain and Iceland (which he locates between
Norway and Greenland), his immense knowledge of plant and
animal geography is displayed. He remarks that the birds of
the Arctic regions who are nearer to the North Pole are stronger,
braver, quicker and more beautiful than those of more southern
lands. He explains precisely why this should be so, and
recognises that two falcons generally considered to be of two
different species are really identical, and their differences are
due only to climatic variations.
He collected observations from all countries. He got experts
sent to him from Arabia and other places and he used their
information where they " knew better." He only claimed to
set forth " what our own experience has taught, or the experi
ence of others/1 and he held that " no certainty is attained by
the ear." Whatever he knows only by hearsay he seeks to
verify. He institutes enquiries, for instance, about the "bar
nacle-geese," which is said to hatch out of worms or shells or
the rotting ships' wood in the northern regions. He specially
sent envoys to the north to fetch such wood and demonstrated
the baselessness of the tale. From this he concluded that this
type of wild goose had her nest in remote regions which were
362 STYLE OF FALCON BOOK v. 3
rarely visited by man. Reports which he could not check he
quoted only with reservations ; when he writes about the
Phoenix described by Pliny he adds : "We cannot, however,
believe this/'
Frederick II rated Aristotle very high as a philosopher, but
considers him a scholar wholly dependent on book-learning,
and does not hesitate to dismiss his statement with a curt
" It is not so." " We have followed Aristotle where necessary,
but we have learnt from experience that he appears frequently
to deviate from the truth, especially in writing of the nature of
certain birds. We have therefore not followed this Prince of
Philosophers in everything . . , for Aristotle seldom or never
hunted with birds, while we have ever loved and practised
hawking." The Emperor frequently corrects Aristotle : " But
we, who have had some practice in the chase, think otherwise."
After he has minutely described how the chain or triangle of
flying waterfowl change their leader he adds " It is therefore
improbable that the leader should remain unchanged as Aris
totle maintains. ..."
The Emperor's book contains thousands of separate observa
tions which are marshalled formally, clearly, and logically,
passing always from the general to the particular as scholastic
method demanded. The sentence construction is usually
lucid, the language — in contrast to the rhetorical manifestos of
his Chancery — is simple, straightforward, matter-of-fact, but
always stately, always couched in the pluralis majestatis, and
clothed with a certainty that defies refutation. It was often
difficult — as the Emperor says — to find Latin synonyms for the
Arabic or Proven9al technical terms. The eye is appealed to
by many hundred drawings of birds which are unquestionably
from the Emperor's own hand. It has been expressly recorded
that he knew how to draw. One of the first two-volume
editions de luxe of this book, which in 1248 at Parma fell into
the enemy's hands, and later came to the Anjous, contains
illuminations which are repeated in later copies. The drawings
are true to life down to the tiniest details, and the style of pic
ture, the birds in flight, in various phases of movement, point
unmistakably to the eager observer himself, though the magni
ficently coloured versions may have been prepared by some
THE SEEING EYE 363
court artist or other. It is possible that Persian or Saracen
drawings influenced Frederick, perhaps ancient codices also.
However this may be, experts pronounce the drawings of the
Falcon Book to be as amazingly " before their time " as is
Sicilian plastic art.
The Emperor's book soon appeared in several French
versions, and ousted all similar works. Short Instructions to
Falconers of Norman and other origin had preceded the imperial
Falcon Book, but they had not the same thoroughness or zoo
logical knowledge, and were not nearly so comprehensive.
Frederick justifiably dismissed them as " inaccurate and in
adequate." What he was aiming at was to lift hawking to the
level of an exact science, which none of the existing books was
competent to do. The Emperor was doubtless acquainted
with oriental works. A Persian falcon book was translated
at King Enzio's command, an Arabic book of healing for
hunting-birds was certainly not unknown to Frederick.
He can scarcely have utilised them, however, since his own
book was based entirely on personal observation. Wherever
opportunity offered the Emperor worked at the writing of
his book " in spite of the unspeakable number of claims upon
our time," as he writes, and we learn incidentally that
during the siege of Faenza he corrected Master Theodore's
translation of an Arabic essay on hunting, written by the
imperial falconer Muamin. A Cremonese translated the same
essay for King Enzio into French. The Emperor wrote the
book only a few years before his death, and King Manfred out
of his own knowledge and from loose sheets of the Emperor's,
posthumously filled many lacunae.
The most important thing about the Falcon Book is not the
fact that Albertus Magnus for instance used it, nor the fact that
other hunting books sprang up, like one by a German knight
who called as witnesses to his prowess in the chase " especially
the huntsmen of the illustrious Lord Frederick, Emperor of the
Romans." Vastly more important was it that the courtiers
of the Emperor and his sons (who resembled their father)
acquired an eye for Nature so that they learned the imperial art
364 FREDERICK AND FRANCIS v. 3
of seeing, whatever they might choose to apply it to. The new
element in the Falcon Book is the idea of seeing and telling
" the things that are, as they are," and that this should be done
not by an unknown settler or scholar but by the Emperor
of the Roman-Christian world : a remarkable parergon of a
great statesman. The Emperor's immediate influence asserted
itself further in another work which was widely circulated,
translated into many languages, and which acted as" a model
for succeeding generations : the Horse Healing of a Calabrian
nobleman and official , Jordamis Ruffus . This was the first book
of veterinary lore that the West produced, and it was written
at the suggestion of the Emperor. The author expressly
declares that he received instruction to a very large extent in
all the matters treated, from the Emperor who was himself an
expert.
It is a significant fact that the great scholars of della Vigna's
circle, those of the type of Michael Scot, all failed completely
when it came to the use of the eye. The Emperor, King Man
fred, Enzio, the noble official Jordanus Ruffus, the Arab fal
coner Muamin, are the men with seeing sight. We may say
that seeing " begins " once more with them ; not that the gift
had been entirely lost ; even in the Middle Ages the peasant
and the huntsman had used their eyes as shrewdly as in other
ages. But those who could put in words what they had seen,
the intellectual, the learned of every kind, the " educated " had
in those days no eyes for the material world. Frederick II,
the predecessor of the great empiricists of the thirteenth
century, of the Dominican Albertus Magnus and the Francis
can Roger Bacon, was the first man to make his appearance who
was at once a master of all current learning, and as a hunter had
from infancy the use of his eyes. It has often been asserted
that the Falcon Book marks a turning point in Western thought,
the beginning of experimental science in the West. And here
we must recall the Emperor's opposite, Francis of Assisi, back
to whom they trace the new feeling for Nature. It is true that
the two approached Nature with different sense organs. If we
reckon Frederick II the first open-eyed mind who traced the
eternal unvarying Law of Nature and of life in type and species
and gradation, we may with equal justice account Francis of
PHYSIQUE 365
Assisi, the first open-eyed soul who spontaneously experienced
Nature and Life as magic and emotion, and traced the same
divine pneuma in all that lived. Dante was both in one.
TRANSFORMER OF THE WORLD ! This was what contem
poraries named Frederick. Not least "transformer" of men.
For this intellectual court of his reared a new human species
in whom philosophy was no kingly caprice, but a begetter of
life. The spiritual knight of the epoch of the Crusade was
gradually superseded by the intellectual knight who was to
prevail in the ensuing centuries. Naturally the Founder was
himself the first of the new species who undertakes a type
of battle for centuries forgotten, which from later ages earned
for the Hohenstaufen Tyrant of Sicily the name of " Herakles
Musagetes."
Frederick II was a warrior and a fighter rather than a knight,
and we miss the glamour of joust and tournament which sur
rounded Barbarossa even in his old age ; the " game " for
Frederick was not the shock of knightly weapons, but the clash
of noble minds. When actual fighting was afoot, however, he
shirked no danger. Seizing a shield he led the attack against a
besieged town ; in open battle he charged the enemy at the head
of his horsemen, especially when wrath and vengeance stirred
his blood. From boyhood he had trained his body in the use of
weapons ; no hardships were too great for him, and to the last
he was equal to all the varied demands made on his physique
by camping in hot weather or in cold. He never even betrayed
signs of fatigue. His body, though but of medium height
was kept in perfect condition, strong and muscular, not thin,
inclining rather to stoutness, never flagging in alertness,
achievement or endurance. Apart from an occasional indis
position and the one attack of plague he had no serious illness,
and with all his love of other types of luxury he maintained a
Spartan regime that allowed him only one meal a day. He had
learnt from the Orient a refined cult of the body which to his
contemporaries appeared simply satanic : a mendicant monk
querulously reports that he did not forego his bath even on the
days of Church festivals. This will have helped to preserve a
366 APPEARANCE v. 3
certain freshness, elasticity and youthfulness which characterised
him. His mode of life also assisted : he spent not less than one-
third of his time in the saddle, and of that full half was given
to hunting. To the very end he felt equal to any exertion.
Two years before his death he was on his horse for fully twenty-
four hours. His black horse, " Dragon/' carried him at dawn
to the chase, at midday into battle, and then all through the
night at top speed from Parma to Cremona. He was so little
fatigued that immediately on arrival in the terrified town,
though it was still dark, he started assembling troops with which
he set out to battle two days later. Similar exploits were fre
quent. Just as the Puer Apuliae swam a river on a barebacked
horse, the Emperor at the opening of his Lombard campaign
accomplished a forced march of eighty-seven miles with his
heavy cavalry in two nights and a day, and at the end of his
ride surprised and took Vicenza : a feat to which his con
temporaries paid a due tribute of admiration.
There was nothing soft about Frederick for all his intellect.
His limbs were as powerful as they were well built. He tore
open the side of the rebel Saracen Amir with a blow of his
foot, and his beautiful and powerful hands will have been
equally terrible in their grip. They were famed also for their
skill and neat fingeredness. Shapely fingers may well have
been part of Frederick's Hohenstaufen inheritance. Even
the twelfth century had noticed and admired Barbarossa's
unwontedly well-formed hands !
We have no evidence of the changes Frederick's appearance
underwent with the lapse of years, especially as the most
valuable witness, the great marble statue of the Emperor seated
on his throne that adorned the gate of the bridge at Capua has
come down to us only as a fragment. Apart from scanty literary
allusions we have nothing to go on but the golden coins,
the Augustales, in particular the very perfect coins of the later
mintages. Every reference we have confirms the fact that
the Emperor retained throughout the " cheerful brow and the
radiant cheerfulness of the eyes "'which had characterised the
Puer Apuliae. To the very last all the chroniclers boast of
PERSONALITY 367
the cheerfulness of his open gaze, and all western observers agree
that he was handsome, with a noble and distinguished counten
ance. They all seek to define the extraordinary fascination
which he exercised, and which perhaps was not unconnected
with his mixed blood ; a brown-tinted skin with rosy cheeks
and auburn-blonde hair, which grew thinner with the years.
An indefinable something clung to him, and, since he remained
always cleanshaven, a something unaging, of eternal youth.
The lack of beard or moustache let all his features be clearly
seen, the short powerful arrogant nose, the remarkably strong
chin, the mouth with its full lips tightly drawn in (so at least
the coins imply), and its frequently mocking impression. The
countenance of a Caesar worthy of the sculptor's chisel, of
which no details recall the accustomed God-the-Father type
of earlier German Emperors as Barbarossa embodied it, and as
the Renaissance Emperors revived it after Frederick II.
One of his enemies described him as sudden, sensual, subtle,
crafty and evil, but adds " if he wished to show favour he could
be friendly, cheerful and gracious." A feeling of insecurity
overtook everyone in his presence. Whether his countenance
was expressing the most charming and winning friendliness or
the most terrifying severity and sternest cruelty, the glance of
his eye never varied, or at most varied by an imperceptible
shade. Part of his magnetism must have lain in this disturbing
effect of his timeless, soulless gaze, which let no man guess his
true feelings ; it was not dissimulation ; it was something much
more deadly. One of his friends said he had the eyes of a
snake, thereby expressing this uncanny fascination. No flashing
penetrating eye, but probably that serene reposeful glance which
perceived unwaveringly, and — in most unchristian wise — was
not directed inward. This unwaveringness must have been
more cruel and alarming, and a thousand times more uncanny,
than a sparkling, lightning glance. It was probably the
amazing calm of two eyes set perfectly parallel, working per
fectly in accord, which at times produces almost the same
effect as mal occhio ; it is interesting to note that one Oriental
described him as " squinting."
None can say how the daring dauntless spirit, which ranged
through all the distances of East and West, lay behind those
368 TOTAL IMPRESSION
all-perceiving eerie eyes, nor how the mighty brain shaped the
head and cheerful brow. The total impression, in spite of its
broad-necked power and steel-like strength, is one of something
lyrical and inspiring, which breathes even from the half-
Romanised Augustales — a German trait to which neither a
Caesar nor a Napoleon could lay claim.
VI. GERMAN EMPEROR
Pope and Emperor in harmony Diet of Ravenna, 1231
King Henry ; Diet of Worms, 123 1 Diet of Friuli,
1232 Growing autonomy of German Princes
Theory of German Empire Burgundy Loss of
Cyprus Frederick aids Pope against Romans Ideal
relation of Empire and Papacy Inquisition The
Great Halleluja Dominicans and Franciscans
Joachim of Flora : 3 Ages of the world John of Vicenza
Conrad of Marburg King Henry's rebellion and
treason Fate of Henry Frederick marries Isabella
of England Diet and Landpeace of Mainz Use of
German for imperial proclamation Henry of Veldeke ;
Godfrey ; Wolfram ; Walther von der Vogelweide
End of Welf-Waibling feud Jew ritual murder case
War with Lombardy Pope's manoeuvres Re-burial
of St. Elizabeth, 1236, at Marburg " Execution of
Justice " against Lombardy Appeal to all Christian
monarchs Appeal to Romans Art of war in Middle
Ages Frederick of Babenberg " the Quarrelsome "
Arrogance of Gregory IX " Donation of Constantine "
Capture of Vicenza Diet of Vicenza Conrad
King of the Romans Cortenuova, 1237 The
" Triumph " in Cremona
VI. GERMAN EMPEROR
FREDERICK II had spent more than a year in reorganising and
consolidating the monarchy in Sicily. In August 1230 he had
made peace with Pope Gregory, in August 1231 the collection
of the Constitutions had been concluded, and a few months
later the Emperor felt free to quit his hereditary kingdom and
devote his attention to the affairs of the Empire. His rule in
the south seemed secure and would not easily be shaken, and he
could now consider the measures necessary to restore imperial
power and prestige throughout the Empire, and could carry his
forcefulness and fame north into Northern Italy and Germany.
The Lord of the Empire must perforce sail under very
different colours from the Tyrant of Sicily. The favour or
hostility of the Pope was a matter almost of indifference in the
Sicilian state, which indeed throve best in open fight : the whole
constitution of the Empire, on the other hand, was based on the
harmony of the two powers, and the Empire at its best required
a perfect balance of the two in good will and in peace. The
Imperium, pillared on its secular and spiritual princes, was not
incorporate in the monarch alone, as was the Sicilian state with
its officials, but in the dual power of Pope and Emperor, who
together constituted " a species of individual " : " two swords
in one scabbard, " two vicegerents of the true King.
The picture which Frederick II strove to present to the world
during the next few years was that of a Christian Imperator
cooperating with the Pope in outward friendship. Never again
did he so closely resemble his imperial ancestors, never was he
so truly the heir of Charlemagne, Otto and Barbarossa as in these
years of peace. His power, not spending its strength in threats
of war, was able to make itself felt far and wide through all the
countries of the Roman Empire, " whose length was vast and
whose breadth ended only at the ends of the earth." The days
of the noble emperors were drawing to a glorious close ; with
Frederick II came the sudden crash. Just once more before
371
372 DIET OF RAVENNA vi
the end, the world was to see what the Middle Ages considered
the " correct conditions " established ; once again Pope and
Emperor in unison, once again the Emperor amid his princes as
primus inter pares. For one last time those ideals were realised
in all their fullness and maturity and clothed in classic phrases
which echo pitifully as empty catchwords in later days of petty
Kaisers and tiara-cr'owned mid-Italian landlords. For one
brief moment Frederick II appeared radiant in the full majesty
of the ancient Holy Roman Empire ; once more, in the Pala
tinates of the Neckar and the Rhine, the brilliance of imperial
glory lit with southern light flared dazzlingly, then was for ever
quenched. Only : the Germans kept a yearning for it all.
From Foggia the Emperor moved northwards to Ravenna.
He took a very modest Sicilian retinue. Berard of Palermo
and Count Thomas of Aquino were the only well-known nobles
who accompanied him. His immediate task was to put Lom
bard and German affairs in order, and the German princes had
been long since invited to a Diet at Ravenna, to be held in
November 1 23 1 . Frederick's first intention had probably been
to march into Northern Italy at the head of his armies ; but the
Pope offered him guarantees for the Lombards' behaviour, and
he abstained from any military steps, with the result that the
Cremona fiasco of 1226, was, as nearly as possible, repeated.
Although the Emperor announced himself as the Pope's
ambassador on a mission to suppress heresy, and although
Gregory really endeavoured to influence the Lombards, the
towns made not the slightest move to send envoys to the Diet
which was to serve " the honour of God, of the Church and of
the Empire, and the prosperity of Lombardy." Quite the
reverse. On the approach of the Emperor the League which
had been gradually disintegrating immediately reconstituted
itself, the mountain passes were again seized by the rebels, and
passage denied to the German forces.
The Emperor was not, at the moment, in a position to inter
vene effectively. The Diet was adjourned till Christmas, and
the Emperor killed time in the ancient town of Gothic Kings
and Byzantine Emperors. He collected valuable building
materials, ancient columns and statues, and despatched them
to Sicily. With remarkable antiquarian zeal he instituted the
i23i FATHER AND SON 373
first systematic excavation. This revealed the mausoleum of
Galla Placidia, and brought to light the beautiful mosaics of this
building which had been completely submerged under boulders
and rubble. Three alabaster sarcophagi were also unearthed,
containing the remains of this Empress, of her consort Theo-
dosius II and of St. Elisha. Antiquarian research had not,
however, been the Emperor's purpose in Ravenna. Gradually
German princes began to assemble in considerable numbers.
Some had come by sea from Venice, some had evaded the Vero
nese and crossed the passes in disguise. The German Grand
Master, Hermann of Salza arrived, and Gebhard of Arnstein,
a Thuringian nobleman, an old acquaintance of Frederick's
who had recently been appointed imperial legate in Tuscany,
came from Central Italy. The person, however, for whom
more especially the Diet had been summoned was still missing :
the Emperor's son, King Henry.
For some time past misunderstandings had been talked of
between Frederick II and the young German King, now some
twenty years of age. Frederick had no serious crime with which
to reproach his son, whom he had not seen for over ten years.
But he had noticed a certain general indocility in the German
King's attitude, both in personal matters towards his father
and in political matters towards the Emperor. He had
been under the tutelage, first of Archbishop Engelbert of
Cologne, and, after the archbishop's assassination, under Duke
Lewis of Bavaria ; but three years ago, at the age of eighteen,
he had begun to reign independently. He took after his father
perhaps, who at twelve considered it " disgraceful " to be still
under guardianship, and who had the good fortune to be his
own master at fourteen. King Henry's first ambition was to get
quit of every sort of wardship, and to enlarge his own indepen
dence, not in the first place at the expense of the Emperor but
rather at the expense of the princes who were thorns in the side
of every German king. To this end he necessarily leagued
himself with their opponents, with the townsfolk who were
increasing in importance in Germany, as elsewhere (the days of
the town leagues were not far off), with the ministeriales, the
374 KING HENRY VII vi
lower nobility who with knightly minstrels were always to be
found in great numbers in his entourage. If King Henry had
in this choice been prompted by political acumen, realising
that Germany's strength and hope lay in the knights and in the
towns, he would have been able to come to some agreement
with his father, or at least profitably to consult with him. Any
such flair for a political situation was, however, wholly foreign
to his nature. He had all the amiability and charm of 'the
Hohenstaufens, but with it an inconsequence and aimlessness
which people called " frivolity." If he favoured townsfolk and
ministeriales he did so from no better reason than opposition
and hostility to the princes who hemmed him in.
It was not long until this line of action on King Henry's
part became embarrassing. When the princes were staying
in Italy in 1230, arranging the Peace of Ceperano between
Emperor and Pope, at a moment, therefore, when Frederick was
more especially beholden to the German nobles, Henry made
an unmistakably hostile move. The citizens of Li6ge were
engaged in a quarrel with their bishop, and King Henry took
the townsfolk under his protection. The occasion itself was
unimportant, but there was a principle at stake, and in a moment
the princes turned on him to a man. Immediately after their
return from Italy, in January 1231, forgetting all their mutual
quarrels, united in resistance, they compelled the King to hold
the unfortunate Diet at Worms in May 1231, and, confident in
the Emperor's support, forced him to surrender a great privv-
lege. Except for a few honorary royal rights the " lords of
the land " were to have well nigh unrestricted sovereignty in
their own territories, especially over the towns. King Henry,
who had been so eager to strengthen the Crown against the
growing encroachments of the princes, had thus succeeded in
weakening it beyond all precedent.
The Emperor's policy was diametrically opposed to his
son's at every point. Frederick II could not approve Henry's
general attitude of hostility to the princes> still less this parti
cular manifestation of it, directed against the princes who were
absent in Italy in the Emperor's service. Nothing could be
less opportune for him than unrest beyond the Alps, and
his son's behaviour was calculated to conjure up an anti-
A DISOBEDIENT SON 375
Staufen alliance of the princes. On the other hand, by allow
ing the Privilege of Worms to be wrung from him, King Henry
had wantonly flung away valuable prerogatives . Frederick him
self had frequently, and that without undue regret, surrendered
royal rights in favour of the princes, but never without an
adequate quid pro quo. The King by his lack of address
had on this occasion secured nothing. There were personal
matters in question also. Henry wanted to divorce his queen,
Margaret of Austria, although he had issue by her, and marry
a youthful flame, Agnes of Bohemia. This had been mooted
against the Emperor's will, for Frederick had had definite
political combinations in view when he negotiated the Austrian
alliance. The question soon became otiose, for Agnes of
Bohemia, to escape further discussion, took the veil. The
affair contributed, however, to the general unpleasantness.
On all these counts the Emperor considered a personal talk
with his son to be necessary, and had therefore invited him
to Ravenna. Whether King Henry was right or wrong his
failure to accept the Emperor's invitation was unwise. So far
he might simply have passed for a somewhat unskilful diploma
tist ; his absence from Ravenna (though he later excused it on
the pretext of the closure of the passes) made him in his father's
eyes a disobedient son. And disobedience, as he might have
been aware, was not the road to Frederick's heart.
In the meantime Frederick had been negotiating in Ravenna
with the German princes and numerous Italian bishops, and
finally had again banned the Lombard League when it continued
to bar the passage over the Alps. The Emperor may not have
been altogether sorry to see the Pope embarrassed by the un
justifiable recalcitrance of the confederate towns, for whose
good behaviour he had gone bail while secretly fomenting their
resistance. The Lombard action had clearly demonstrated that
it was impossible here to assert the authority of the Empire
without resort to force. The tangled skein of Northern Italy
was obviously not to be unravelled by peaceful measures, for
every edict of the Emperor's introduced fresh complications.
He had, for instance, given orders when outlawing the League,
376 QUITS RAVENNA vi
that the loyal towns of Lombardy should not elect their annual
podesta from any of the rebel towns. This immediately caused
friction with Genoa, who had just done him exceptional honour
by sending a magnificent embassy ; for the Genoese had ap
pointed a podesta from Milan, and were now faced by the delicate
choice of offending the League by rejecting the Milanese 6r
offending the Emperor by retaining him. The Emperor could
not permit an exception immediately after issuing his command.
In spite of the strong imperial feeling in Genoa the Milanese
was installed. Though he was reluctant to disturb his good
relations with Genoa the Emperor at once retaliated by mea
sures which injured the Genoese trade in Sicily. It was
frankly impossible to conduct politics in Lombardy without an
army.
Pope Gregory had again volunteered to mediate between
Frederick and the League. The Emperor cannot have built
much on his offer, for he had had some experience of papal
mediation and arbitration. His misgivings were not unjustified.
Though Gregory ostensibly supported the Emperor his choice
of arbitrators and their line of action showed clearly in whose
favour the so-called impartial verdict was to be given. The
arbitrators were declared enemies of the Emperor, cardinals
who were natives of the League towns. Instead of bearing to
the rebels the terms proposed by the aggrieved Emperor they
treated first with the confederate revolutionaries, and finally
set out for Ravenna with the cut-and-dried proposals of the
Leaguers. The Emperor did not wait to hear their award :
he knew perfectly what to expect, but he was unwilling at the
moment to fall out with the Pope. When the papal arbitrators
arrived in Ravenna at the beginning of March they were sur
prised to find the Emperor gone. He rode out to the town one
afternoon, as he was in the habit of doing. A fully-equipped
galley was at anchor off the coast ready to sail ; he embarked
with a few attendants and disappeared. He had made all pre
parations long before. Foreseeing a protracted absence he
had sent Thomas of Aquino back to Sicily as Captain of the
kingdom, had dismissed the other participants in the Ravenna
diet, only retaining the German princes, and adjourned his
Court till Easter in Aquileia. He did not invite his son's pres-
VENICE 377
ence ; he commanded his attendance in Aquileia, and betook
himself thither by sea.
The princes who had been left behind in Ravenna soon
heard the unexpected news that the Emperor was on his way
first to Venice. Most of them made haste to follow him by
land. As Frederick's relations with Verona were for the
moment unsatisfactory he now sought to secure Venice for his
ally, and to take advantage for his own purposes of the rivalry
between the two towns in the East. He had other weighty
incentives. As the mountain passes were under a constant threat
the road via Venice and Friuli was the only certain route to
Germany, and a good understanding with the Venetians was
therefore of the utmost importance. He sailed by Comacchio,
Loreto and Chioggia. He halted for a short time in Loreto,
and there received the envoys of the independent Republic
(no appanage of the Empire) who hastened thither to greet him.
To them he confided his desire to visit Venice to worship St.
Mark, their patron saint* The Venetians immediately con
vened their Grand Council and decided to grant the Emperor's
request. Frederick, therefore, continued his journey to Chiog
gia. When Frederick landed on the shores of St Mark and stood
beside the Doge, Jacopo Tiepolo, he brought all his charm and
amiability into play. The Venetians received him with pomp
and ceremony ; he presented costly gifts of gold and precious
stones to their saint, and received from their rich store of relics
a splinter of the True Cross : he loaded them, almost against
their will, with privileges and trade prerogatives for Sicily ;
but nothing dispelled the distrust of these traders and seafarers,
a distrust equalled only by their unlimited arrogance. Thanks
to their immense possessions in the Levant, especially in the
Latin Empire, the Venetians felt themselves almost the Emperor's
equals. They did not intend to be under any obligation to the
Hohenstaufen. A Venetian goldsmith was commissioned by
Frederick to make him a crown ; the Grand Council granted
permission, only on the condition that no harm should arise
from it to the Republic. The Emperor's power alarmed Venice ;
they wanted no dealings with him. On the first opportunity
378 HENRY'S HUMILIATION vi
the Republic joined Frederick's Lombard enemies : on the
other hand, Venice was the first town to conclude Peace with
the Emperor, when a Genoese became Pope.
At Easter 1232 the German princes were assembled in un
usual numbers round Frederick II in Aquileia. King Henry
at first attempted to evade his father's command. Some of
the princes, however, who were on their way back from
Ravenna met the king in Augsburg, and told him of the
Emperor's mood. Their urgent representations induced
Henry to appear, however reluctantly, at the Diet summoned
expressly for him. The Emperor appointed the adjacent
Cividale for his residence with some attendants, but ordered
Aquileia to be closed to him. In a business-like way, as if
negotiating with a foreign prince, Frederick conducted from
Aquileia the discussions with his son*. After Henry had
submitted to the imperial conditions, and not before, he was
permitted to see his father face to face, for the first time in ten
years. As father he reproved the son ; as Emperor he made
heavy demands on the disobedient king. In Cividale, where
the Court repaired after some weeks, King Henry was compelled
solemnly to swear, in the presence of his princely opponents, to
obey all commands of the Emperor in future, and to treat the
German princes henceforward with due respect, as "lights
and protectors of the Empire " and " apples of the Emperor's
eye." The oath was further reinforced by a written document
in which Henry himself released the princes from their oaths
of fealty in case of fresh disobedience, and adjured them in
that event to rise against him on the Emperor's behalf. The
Emperor pressed his advantage further, and compelled King
Henry to write also to the Holy Father and inform him what
oath he had sworn to the " divine Augustus," and beg Pope
Gregory to excommunicate without further notice the German
King if he should break the promise made to his father.
Frederick II had thus harnessed to his will the two forces which
were wont to strive against the Roman Emperor — at the ex
pense, it is true, of his recalcitrant son. For Henry the Light-
hearted, under the supervision of Princes and Pope, was granted
only a period of probation : an intolerable position, in compari
son with which deposition would have been kinder and less
GERMAN CONSTITUTION 379
severe. All royal freedom of action was denied him, who had
sought to be independent and self-sufficing. The Emperor
treated him as he was wont to treat a rebellious town : demand
ing unconditional surrender to his will, an oath of obedience,
and submission to imperial supervisors. King Henry would
have been no Hohenstaufen if this end of his dreams had not
proved the beginning of his tragedy.
The Friuli Diet, which dragged on till the end of May (being
transferred from Cividale to Udine, and then to Pordenone so
that the whole burden might not fall on one town), was im
mensely important to the German constitution. It is a common
place that the results of decisions there taken are still to be
felt. Since King Henry had allowed the Privilege of Worms
to be wrung from him, the Emperor had no option but to
confirm this " Edict in favour of the Princes/1 It thus came
about that Frederick II, the last of the German Emperors
who had been elected as Duke of a race in the old sense, saw
the end of the Germanic kingship based on race and armies.
From the point of view of constitutional history Germany
may henceforth be styled a Confederation of Princes or a
Princely Oligarchy.
Every German statesman is faced by the same problem : to
establish the ideal relation between the Empire and its members.
Each preceding answer seems to have been suitable as a momen
tary, but questionable as a permanent solution : each has been
big with fate. In Frederick's day the problem might have
been stated somewhat as follows : everywhere each state was
pressing on towards immediacy ; the absolutism of such a
state as the Kingdom of Sicily, for instance, must in some way
be reconciled with the existing kingship of the Germans based
on race and feudal force. Contrary to what might have been
expected Frederick II never even contemplated the attempt
to transform the whole of Germany into a unified officialised
Germany, comparable to the Sicilian monarchy. It is true that
in later days Frederick from his Italian base pushed forward
his Sicilian bureaucratic regime as far as Burgundy and the
Tyrol, and even in a modified form as far as Austria, so that
380 POWER OF PRINCES vi
the thesis might be sustained that Frederick had simply been
unable to complete the " Sicilianisation " of the Empire, which
was creeping steadily from South to North, because he died
prematurely before he was sufficiently master of Lombardy.
There is no sign, however, that the Emperor was planning
to push his Sicilian official system further northwards. All
historical and spiritual forces in the country would at once have
failed him, and one essential was lacking : the cultivated lay
man and the cultivated townsman who existed in Italy ; the
whole great stratum of lay jurists which replaced the feudal
system as the basis of the Sicilian- Italian State. Frederick II
never contemplated undermining the feudal forces of extensive
and deeply subdivided Germany, and ruling through officials
without the intervention of the princes. The German princes,
moreover, were not Sicilian barons and duodecimo clerics, they
were the Emperor's peers.
Since the Emperor renounced all intention of exercising in
Germany his new methods of rule, the task of ruling must
fall on the German princes who were in any case striving
for greater independence, and whose rights were long since
steadily increasing at the expense of the rights of the Crown.
Frederick II allowed the princes to continue in this path, nay
even supported them, because this exactly fitted his imperial
policy which was narrowing down into a Lombard policy.
More than any preceding Emperor, Frederick was first and fore
most the super-national Roman Imperator, whose great mid-
European Imperium stretched from Syracuse to Friesland and
the Baltic. To strengthen the Empire his first need was an
utterly submissive Lombardy. Without this the Empire was
rent in two. To reduce Lombardy, Frederick needed the
forces of Germany, but needed even more — as security also
against the Pope — an assurance of peace in the North and the
protection of his rear by the trusty princes of Germany, both
spiritual and temporal. By the sacrifice of his own revenues
and prerogatives he could purchase all this from the powerful
nobles who had clipped the wings of so many victorious
Emperors before him. For the sake of the cause he did not
hesitate to make the sacrifice, the less because his Sicilian
wealth and resources were ample compensation. Sicilian
LORDS OF THE LAND 381
gold was potent in money-lacking Germany, and Frederick's
generosity won the attachment of the princes to his person, an
attachment which withstood amazingly the protracted intrigues
and machinations of the Church.
It cannot be doubted that practical considerations and the
higher necessities of the Roman Empire prompted Frederick
to these sacrifices in favour of the princes. What followed,
whether with or against his will, was the almost sovereign
independence of each individual prince in his own territory.
The concessions which Frederick in his early days had made
to the spiritual princes were extended by the new charters of
Worms and Friuli to the temporal princes also, so that a certain
uniformity prevailed throughout Germany. The princes , being
thus all on more or less the same footing, began to feel them
selves more of a corporate body than formerly, and became
aware of a community of interest, advantageous or disadvan
tageous for the Emperor as the case might be. Renouncing
most of the Crown rights in the princes' territories, Frederick,
according to the new privileges, had agreed to abandon royal
rights of coinage, the right of building imperial fortifications,
the royal jurisdiction throughout all the lands of the princes, or,
as they now came to be significantly called, the " Lords of the
Land." The princes' authority vis-d-vis their subjects was
enhanced, for the inferior courts of law were placed under the
immediate jurisdiction of the princes, and jurisdiction other
than theirs was abolished or greatly limited. Other clauses
pointed in the same direction, so that the princes exercised
almost autocratic power in their own domains, or were on the
high road to acquiring it. An intensification of state organisa
tion was thus set on foot in Germany as in Sicily, not emanating
from and re-enforcing the central royal authority, but strength
ening the separate parts, the princes. It was now possible for
them to consolidate their states, and the constructive forces
inherent in unity of race and country were immensely easier to
release, develop, exploit under the direct thorough-going rule
of a minor monarch than under mediate rule of an Emperor
hampered by the princes, or of a prince hampered by the
existence of intrusive royal rights. This clean sweep of all the
powers that interfered between the lord of the land and his
382 CLEAVAGES OF GERMANY vi
territories made it possible for the individual states to begin
government in earnest.
From this point of view the Emperor's policy of strengthen
ing the prince appears as a simplication of the whole German
state, and of untold importance for the consolidation of the
loosely-strung widely-spreading German lands, in which from
of old all strength and statesmanship had lain in the individual
clans and not in the congeries of German races. It was, how
ever, a policy fraught with immense danger. The stronger the
constituent states grew the less hope there was of unifying them
into one German super-state, and Frederick's course of action
prolonged the subdivision of Germany. He definitely hindered
the amalgamation of the German people into one " German
State." The policy, moreover, reacted injuriously on the
Empire as a whole, for the princes, each immersed in the
development of his own domains, displayed little active interest
in the fate of the Empire. The important gain for Frederick
was that the princes kept the peace and were ready at need to
stand behind him to a man ; a state of affairs that lasted
twenty years and more. It is common knowledge how disas
trous this increased independence proved. With the decline of
the Roman Irnperium the last unifying impulse was gone. Each
lord of the land pursued the aims and interests of his own
territory, and developed a narrow provincial outlook which took
no heed of the world at large, of Germany, or Emperor, or
Empire. Cleavages and clefts that the pressure of the Empire
had kept closed now yawned and widened.
However ready Frederick was to subordinate Germany's
advantage to the World Empire, it is scarcely conceivable that
a statesman of his calibre can have failed to visualise one united
northern kingdom, suited to the conditions of the expiring
Middle Ages. He would gain nothing from a mere semblance
of power, and if this was to be avoided he must re-organise the
whole kingdom on a new basis, with due regard to the new
conditions. A few individual measures destined to enhance
the central imperial power show that he had some definite
scheme in mind. If the Lombard struggle had ended quickly
GERMAN POLICY 383
and happily we can imagine that the Emperor would have intro
duced some uniform method of administration for all terri
tories. While preserving their sovereignty intact he might
have metamorphosed the princes into viceroys, parallel to the
later Vicars General of Italy, with their princely, even royal
state. Frederick is credited with the intention of making a
collection of imperial law and legal procedure. He must cer
tainly have had such a work in mind which would have guided
the princely governments into definite lines. It was not long
after this time that Frederick appointed a Grand Justiciar for
Germany, thereby implying that the Emperor's supreme juris
diction should be asserted, while the normal administration of
justice in each country should remain with the individual
princes.
The essential thing, however, was that the Emperor should
have some positive force at his disposal to guarantee the good
faith of the princes and to compensate for the securities he had
foregone. He required a sufficient force to compel obedience
at need and enforce the unity of the Empire. It is of the
utmost interest to note what deductions Frederick II drew from
the reshuffling of the German powers. The Emperor had
divested himself of so many prerogatives that he could no
longer claim to be the foremost and the mightiest in virtue of
his privileges ; he must prove himself so by actual strength.
The personal private resources of the monarch had to fill the
place of the impersonal imperial property and crown rights.
This change is foreshadowed in the efforts of the Hohenstaufens
to secure for themselves a firm working basis in the south.
Now for the first time Sicily provided an Emperor with just
such a personal possession. It lay wholly outside the range
of the German princes, and, secure in his Sicilian resources,
Frederick had been able to abandon his German prerogatives.
In securing Sicily the Hohenstaufen Emperors had not had
this policy in view. Sicily, like the other countries, was there
to serve the Empire as a whole. Frederick II, standing on the
borderline between the two epochs, was the first to feel the
need of founding a personal power in the North within Ger
many itself : setting the precedent which the Hapsburg was
so happily to follow — a remarkable coincidence. In 1236 the
384 PERSONAL MAGIC vi
Emperor crushed the rebellion of the last of the Babenbergs,
Frederick the Fighter, of Austria and Styria. The Emperor
confiscated his dukedoms and retained them under the
immediate administration of the Empire, instead of grant
ing them to some new fiefholder after a year and a day, as
custom was. Thus in the south-eastern corner of the kingdom,
where Bohemia, Hungary and the dukedom of Austria still
offered large unbroken stretches of territory, the Hohenstaufen
Frederick, whose Swabian patrimony, though scattered, was
still of considerable extent, sought to build up a new power.
The war against the Austrian Duke was only a minor action
in larger campaigns, and the Duke ultimately succeeded in
recovering the bulk of his lands. An agreement was reached
later, and at one stage the Dukedom of Austria was to be
elevated into a kingdom. This plan, however, fell through.
Frederick the Fighter, last of the Babenbergs, ultimately
died childless in 1246 and his vacant fief fell to the Empire.
Frederick II forthwith revived his original scheme, retained the
dukedom for himself, entrusted its administration to Sicilian
Captains General, and bequeathed it as hereditary Hohen
staufen property to his grandson. The Emperor's fighting
was, in future, mainly confined to Italy, and the importance of
the Hohenstaufen personal Austrian domain was slight. The
amazing thing is the astounding foresight of this world-states
man and his unerring intuition of what was to come.
The Emperor thus sought to forestall the dangers conjured
up by his own surrender of innumerable safeguards and by his
strengthening of the imperial princes. Frederick's greatest
power lay, nevertheless, in his own personality. At the zenith
of his glory Frederick II, most Roman of all German Emperors,
possessed not only the armed force, but the personal magic, to
sway the princes to his will and direct their gaze to the great
problems of the Roman world. In these glorious years the
strengthened princes and the double renown of the ancient
kingdom-in-arms and the new Empire brought about that
unique fulfilment which preluded the end : that full perfec
tion of the German Empire, a mighty Emperor surrounded by
his mighty princes. The dream of their return lulled anaemic
generations for centuries to come. Germany as Imperium was
A SUPER-NATIONAL EMPIRE 385
at that moment the symbol and embodiment of the great con
ception of a Roman Empire embracing and unifying all peoples
and races of the world, conterminous and identical with a
great Christian Empire. This was possible because Germany
preserved, for weal or woe, the multitude of races and princes
which corresponded to that ideal and imaginary community
of Europe's peoples and kings. In contrast to her shrewd,
practical neighbours in the West, Germany remained always
" the Empire."
The ideal World-Empire of the Middle Ages did not involve
the subjection of all peoples under the dominion of one. It stood
for the community of all kings and princes, of all the lands and
peoples of Christendom, under one Roman Emperor, who should
belong to no nation, and who, standing outside all nations, should
rule all from his throne in the one Eternal City. Only thus
could the perfect Germany arise, setting before princes and
races the idea : the Imperium Romanum — and yet : nations.
The domination of one race over the other would, therefore,
have been a betrayal in favour of one peculiar type — Saxon or
Frank, Swabian or ultimately Prussian. For in the State
dominated by one race (iix spite of the attainment of a genuine
non-national unity) the best powers of all the races could never
flourish equally, to produce the one world-embracing German.
Less fortunate, perhaps, than lonians and Dorians, no single
race, whether Saxon or Swabian or Frank, possessed a world-
sense, though each alone was well-equipped with state-sense :
the feeling for the universal — divorced alas from the feeling for
the state — was incorporate only in the super-national German
whole. Frederick never contemplated such a betrayal, never
aimed at ruling Germany with Swabian knights and esquires.
He was no Swabian Duke, no German King, he was solely
Roman Caesar and Imperator, he was Divus Augustus — as none
before him and none since. As Roman Caesar, centring in
himself and in his own person the German whole, he became the
symbol, foreign though it was, which supplied the one possible
form of the self-fulfilment Germany was then seeking : self-
fulfilment within the Roman Empire.
386 " PRIMUS INTER PARES" vi
The great Empire of this great Emperor was not a German
National State on the model of Sicily, or of France under the
Capets. The true statesman does not apply one hard and fast
scheme to all countries. Yet in a higher sense Frederick II
perfected and completed the unified German Empire. He did
not here pose as the priest-like Emperor and imperial Mediator
who figured in the Sicilian bureaucratic State, nor yet as the
Demi-God sent from heaven, nor yet as the Son of God. The
oriental love of hero-worship is radically foreign to the Ger
manic mind, especially while the hero is still in the flesh.
Amongst the Germans he aimed rather at creating the impres
sion of the King soaring to heaven, borne aloft on the shoulders
of the princes. The release of the princes from feudal fetters
and their unlimited powers (which now for the first time
united them in the " voluntary unity " of the late Middle Ages)
made the Hohenstaufen autocrat, in literal truth, amongst
his autocrats, primus inter pares — the first amongst his peers.
Further, since all royal authority and all royal rights had been
withdrawn throughout the princes' territories, his imperial
throne had no longer any basis upon earth. As the German
princes themselves phrased it at the Friuli Diet : " The imperial
throne, to which we are attached as the limbs are attached to
the head, rests like the head upon our shoulders and is firmly
upheld by our body, so that the Majesty of the Emperor
shines forth in glory and our princely rank reflects the glory
back again." This is the traditional conception of the Empire,
which at last finds ultimate expression and literal realisation ;
for a brief span, and almost against the ruler's desire. Unlike
his predecessors Frederick never weakened or oppressed the
princes to make his own greatness look the greater by contrast
with their weakness. He strengthened the princes' power,
even created a new dukedom, with more exalted statesmanship
believing that the power and the glory and the brilliance of his
own imperial sceptre would not pale in giving forth light, but
would gain in radiance and would shine the brighter the more
mighty and brilliant and majestic were the princes whom
Caesar Imperator beheld " as equals round his judgment seat."
The princes are no longer columns bearing as a burden the
weight of the throne. Like the officials of the South, and yet
A RIDDLE 387
very differently, they become piers and pillars expressive of
upward-soaring strength, preparing the glorious elevation of
the " prince of princes and king of kings " who is borne aloft
on the shoulders of his peers, and who in turn exalts both kings
and princes.
Life was always unthinkable for Frederick without the sense
of tension ; here is an incomparably daring gamble, in which
the slightest reshuffling of the cards will mean ruin. Frederick
faced the situation unflinching, with wide-open eyes. He
wrote later : " Germania's princes on whom hangs our eleva
tion — and our fall." The danger was proportional to the
elevation, no more. The Germans recognised Frederick II as
fate incarnate and as doom ; they yearned for him, they
shrank from him. With him the Empire fell ; but more
enduring than a century of safety were the few hours during
which a German Emperor was privileged to tread such danger
ous heights. The increased power of the princes was a necessary
factor therein. If the correct balance was to be maintained
in Germany feeble limbs could not support an over-weighty
head : princes and Emperor together represented that super-
national German, symbolised the " illustrious body of the
Holy Empire," the corpus mysticum of the " German-as-a-
Whole," which Frederick II justifiably identified with his own
body. For this stranger, this Roman of Swabian race, em
bodied that European- German personage whom men had
dreamt of, who combined the triple culture of Europe : the
cultures of the Church, the East, the Ancients. The Church
was to Frederick II something complete and finished, which he
had in himself outgrown, which lay behind him. Nietzsche
called Frederick " to my mind the FIRST EUROPEAN," and wrote
of "that magic, intangible, unfathomable Riddle of a man
predestined to victory and betrayal." The type was one most
difficult for the Germans to assimilate by reason of just
that Roman chiselling, that secretiveness, that complete self-
sufficingness.
The solemn speech-making of Friuli was the prelude to
Frederick IFs personal intervention in German affairs, and it
388 DIET OF FRIULI vi
was German business which here chiefly engaged attention.
Counsel was taken, however, about other countries of the
Empire, and much important business transacted. A favourable
turn was given to the Lombard question by Frederick's success
in winning over the brothers Eccelino and Alberigo of Romano,
who were just then acquiring great importance in the March
of Treviso. By a skilfully-engineered rising they succeeded
in making Frederick master of Verona, so that the Alpine passes
were now open to the Germans. The kingdom of Burgundy
also, which was very loosely attached to the Empire, was drawn
into closer relationship, and before long Burgundian forces
were, for the first time, commandeered for imperial purposes.
Envoys of the French King, Louis IX, St. Louis, arrived to
conclude a pact of friendship. And here the ambassadors of
the " Old Man of the Mountain," the head of the Assassins,
came to find Frederick, and the ambassadors of the Sultan of
Damascus, who brought a planetarium made of gold and jewels
to the Maliku 1 Umara, the King of the Amirs. The Feast of
the Hijra came round. In honour of the Muslim envoys the
Emperor celebrated the day of the Prophet's Flight by a brilliant
banquet, attended by German princes and bishops.
After an absence of many months from Germany the princes
were finally loaded with costly gifts and dismissed in the middle
of May, amongst them King Henry, on whose behaviour the
peace of the North now hung. Frederick himself, with his
oriental escort, took ship to Apulia. On his way he made a
successful attack on the Dalmatian pirates, took many prisoners
and flung them into chains. His next immediate affairs were
negotiations with the Pope.
The outward vision of concord did not alter the fact that the
peace between the Emperor and Pope was a secret battle, con
ducted with the weapons of an infinitely delicate diplomacy.
The tension between Frederick II and Gregory IX, just veiled
for the moment, had reached a height unprecedented in the
long warfare between Empire and Papacy. Henry VI and
Innocent III had not held the stage together ; equal powers
now existed simultaneously and stood face to face awaiting the
POPE AND EMPEROR 389
outburst of the final battle ; but both postponing it a while and
both willing for expediency to exercise moderation and control.
Deadly enemies, each as capable as the other of savage passion,
but for the moment unable to dispense with each other, and
each benefiting by the momentary truce. The Emperor
benefited perhaps even more than the Pope, his wish for peace
with Gregory was certainly more sincere, was even too sincere,
though his hate for the old man in Rome was deep.
No sooner was peace concluded than an amazing diplomatic
game began between Court and Curia, a game which was to last
for some years yet, though with ever-growing embitterment.
In the eyes of the world the two powers still figure as Father
and Son, and while both weigh each several step with utmost
caution, and each watches lynx-like to exploit any chance of
weakness on the other's part, each is equally eager to seize
opportunities of offering civility and assistance, so as to place
the other under an obligation. Each side had difficulties and
to spare. Pope Gregory was openly at war with the Romans.
He had had to quit the town because the citizens had risen
against their bishop, as had been occurring long since in the
other communes of Italy. The thought of the ancient republi
can freedom of Rome was not without influence on men's
minds, and they craved territorial expansion. The Romans
always cast covetous glances on the Campagna and the Patri-
monium. As enemies of their bishop they were the natural
allies of the Emperor, yet Frederick, at the Pope's request, had
sent a detachment of troops to Viterbo, which was usually the
first point of their attack.
Frederick on his side was not without serious embarrassments.
Apart from Lombard problems he had' to assure himself of the
Pope's concurrence in all questions relating to his son Henry,
so as to be secure against surprise. The kingdom of Syria, too,
provided endless difficulties. Not that the Saracens had broken
the truce, but because the Christians raged against each other.
The Syrian-Cypriot nobles, under the leadership of the some
time administrator of Cyprus, John of Ibelin, and supported
by the Patriarch Gerold and the people, had inflicted a severe
defeat on the imperial marshal, Richard Filangieri, who had
enjoyed some initial successes. It ended within a year with
390 PAPAL DIPLOMACY vi
the loss of Cyprus. Pope Gregory had now at last granted
the Hohenstaufen Emperor the long- withheld title of King of
Jerusalem. It cost him nothing to take the Emperor's part on
the distant, now indifferent, oriental scene, and it laid on Frede
rick the obligation of some return service. So Pope Gregory
loudly denounced Patriarch Gerold, whom we know of old, and
abruptly recalled him ; the Curia having been suddenly as
sailed with misgivings about his behaviour during the* Crusade.
" People whisper in secret and openly proclaim that the Syrian
kingdom of our well-beloved son in Christ, Frederick, the ever-
exalted Emperor of the Romans, King of Jerusalem and Sicily,
has been unsettled by thy means, for thy hand has lain behind
the hands of the disturbers of the peace." This was the new
note in the Pope's letters to Gerold, whom he replaced by the
Patriarch Albert of Antioch. The Pope was similarly ready to
go to any lengths against King Henry ; his reasons were trans
parent. The ruin of the German King, if skilfully exploited,
might mean the collapse of the whole Hohenstaufen rule north
of the Alps. On Frederick's side it was the usual game of
harnessing opposition forces, when he himself requested the
Pope, nay even — to enhance the effect — compelled King Henry
to request the Pope to excommunicate the son if he should
prove rebellious to the father. Emperor and Pope were here
able to indulge in the amusement of mutually obliging each
other — each secure in the faith that he would ultimately outwit
his foe — and of presenting to the world the edifying spectacle of
their affectionate harmony.
Frederick was perfectly aware that this untroubled amity
would not last a day longer than Gregory's Roman embarrass
ment, and he was therefore in no hurry effectively to end this,
hoping to derive some advantage for himself in his Lombard
affairs from the present favourable situation. The Romans
themselves increased the pressure on the Pope so greatly that
by the end of July 1232, shortly after Frederick's return from
Aquileia, Pope Gregory decided definitely to request the Em
peror's help against the Romans, though knowing well that he
would have to requite his imperial ally by concessions in other
spheres. The Emperor received the papal letter exhorting him
" to dash to the ground the pride of these overweening Romans
i232 IMPERIAL DIPLOMACY 391
with his triumphant and illustrious right hand, to scatter the
demon hosts and break the horns of the ungodly.*' Frederick
was obliged, most reluctantly he said, to refuse. He had, in
fact, tthe luck to hear at the same moment of the rebellion
in Messina, which imperatively recalled him to Sicily, and
claimed all the fighting forces of his kingdom. So the most
the Emperor could do was to place his good friends the Romans
under the imperial ban. But he immediately summoned the
Germans, the feudal knights of Provence, and of the whole
kingdom of Burgundy, to come to the assistance of the harassed
Pope. The imperial diplomat killed several birds with this
one stone. It was the first time in history that the feudal
army of Burgundy had been summoned for service in Italy, and
Frederick created this weighty precedent not in his own but
ostensibly in the Pope's sole interest. Further, this sum
mons gave Frederick an opportunity of sending an imperial
plenipotentiary to the Burgundian court, with the remark that
it was a very long time since Burgundy had performed any
service for the Empire ; not indeed that he wished to cast this
fact in her teeth, since she had not been offered the opportunity.
Thirdly, Frederick had great hopes that, though he personally
had displayed the utmost promptitude, it would be a consider
able time before help actually reached the Pope. Meantime,
he had not antagonised the Romans whose friendship might
at any moment be valuable, and amongst whom he had built
up a strong aristocratic party. Finally, he could now devote
himself in peace to restoring order in Messina and the other
towns in the island of Sicily.
The Pope had hoped that Frederick, the King of Sicily, the
feudal vassal of the Holy See, would appear in person before
the walls of Rome ; he expressed himself, however, grateful
for the assistance promised. A remarkable correspondence
now set in between Pope and Emperor, taking its rise in the
immediate circumstances, but laying down in the most perfect
form the ideal relationship between Empire and Papacy and
the principles of their mutual assistance. It was a remarkable
feature of the time that in treating any question of the moment
the eternal order of the universe was always included. Pope
Gregory expressed his thanks that " the Emperor's spirit
392 MASTERLY CORRESPONDENCE vi
had been illuminated and rightly directed by a ray of divine
radiance and the inspiration of God himself, who had united
the son to his mother (the Church) and the mother to her
son, to restore the rights of Church and Empire.*' The wily
Gregory supplied precisely the phrases that Frederick had long
and eagerly awaited; for in view of the triangular struggle
of Emperor, Pope and Lombards, nothing was so dear to
Frederick's heart as a rapprochement with Gregory that would
loosen the Pope's disastrous attachment to the towns. Frede
rick hastened, therefore, to answer in similar style in a lengthy
letter, which the writer, Piero della Vigna and the Grand
Justiciar Henry of Morra, both of them negotiators in Lombard
affairs, were entrusted to carry to the Pope. This masterly
composition, enriched by all possible resources of style and
playing on words, formulated a universal doctrine : God, the
all-foreseeing physician, had in time diagnosed the double
oppression of the Church by heretics and rebels, and to combat
these two diseases had prepared not two separate medicines
but a double treatment : " The ointment of the priestly office by
which the inner infirmity of false servants is spiritually healed,
and the might of the imperial sword which cleanses with its
edge the suppurating wounds, and with its whetted blade of
worldly Empire hews off from the conquered foe all that is
infected and decayed." Again : " This, Most Holy Father, is
in truth the one, yet dual, healing for our sickness. Although
Holy Empire and Holy Priesthood from their names appear
two separate entities yet they are in the effective sense one and
the same, being of like origin, consecrated by the divine power.
They are to be guarded by the same reverent homage and — I
shudder to say it — annihilated by the same overthrow of their
common faith. "
It is worth noting that there, in writing to the Pope, as else
where in speaking to the princes, Frederick alludes to the
downfall of the Empire. He was perfectly aware that his
throne was a volcano. His statecraft in Sicily is based on a
knowledge of the insecurity of existing institutions . The inter
dependence of Empire and Papacy has never been more clearly
expressed than by Frederick II. It is Dante's vision of the two
Suns of Rome, based on the immediate relation of the Emperor
THE INQUISITION 393
to God, which Frederick here emphasises, and which the Church
never recognised. We shall see later that Frederick's picture
of the ideal Pope anticipates Dante's most exactly. This
doctrine, however, apart from its general, eternal, universal
validity, had a very present practical application : " Therefore,
Most Blessed Father, since we are one, and assuredly feel alike,
let us take thought as one for the common service : let us
restore the Church's impaired freedom, and while we renew the
rights of Church and Empire let us sharpen the swords en
trusted to us against the underminers of the faith and the rebels
of the Empire. . . ." This return to present affairs meant, in
fact, would the Pope be so good as to enforce obedience on
the Lombard rebels with the same zeal as Frederick showed
against heretics — " for time is pressing and quibbling out of
place ! "
Frederick II had entrusted to the Pope the mediation in
Lombardy. The Emperor's general position, after the Friuli
Diet, and after the alliance with Eccelino and Verona, and
after various imperial successes in Northern Italy, seemed
so unusually favourable that the Lombards were prepared to
make many concessions. Only on two points were the parties
irreconcilable : the Emperor demanded satisfaction for the
closure of the Verona passes, and refused to recognise the
Lombard League as such. For the confederation was to him a
rebel state within the State, which split the Empire in two and
severed Sicily from Germany. This was why the Lombard
question was the fountain head of all quarrels between Court
and Curia : Frederick needed an unconditionally submissive
Lombardy to round off his Empire ; while the Pope, to stave
off this encircling power, was bound in defiance of right or
custom to look with favour on such a buffer as the League pro
vided. Since the Pope at the moment wanted Frederick's help
he skilfully evaded contentious matters and put off the whole
Lombard question. This expedient was probably not unwel
come to the Emperor, for it left all possibilities still open. They
were thus partially at one on the subject of Lombards and rebels,
and even of heretics, though they held different views on the
methods of the Inquisition. After the Sicilian insurrection
Frederick permitted his imperial officials and a few docile
394 DOMINICANS vi
clerics to carry on an Inquisition of a markedly political type,
but he excluded all papal assistants ; whereas in Lombardy
the Inquisitors were all the Pope's creatures, Dominicans for
the most part. The Pope was none too well pleased with the
imperial methods of heretic-hunting, while Frederick strongly
objected to the Lombard Inquisition's proceeding without the
presence of imperial officials, for he had sound reason to fear
disturbance of the loyal towns. For Emperor and Pope alike
utilised the edicts against heretics as a welcome political
weapon, and ere long the papal interdict lay heavy on Verona,
with her new imperial leanings, and on her ruler, Eccelino.
Anyone, in fact, who failed to accommodate himself to the papal
or the imperial will was a heretic : for this was manifest
rebellion against God.
While Pope and Emperor, each in his own way, persecuted
the heretics, an event suddenly took place which can only be
compared to some great natural cataclysm. The entire North
of Italy succumbed simultaneously t<? the madness and con
fusion of the penance mania. This movement is probably not
unconnected with the Dominican persecutions in the North.
Dominicans were amongst the chief leaders of the penitents,
and rivalry with the Franciscan Order may have been another
factor. Francis of Assisi had long since been canonised, and in
July 1232 another Franciscan, Anthony of Padua, had been
beatified, whereas twelve years had elapsed since the death of
Dominic, and no one had yet officially recognised his saintliness
or honoured him by canonisation. A bishop who was in close
touch with the preaching monks even challenged the brothers :
" Now that * Brothers Minor ' have a saint of their own,
get yourselves one somehow, even if you have to throw him
together out of wooden stakes." People took saints very
seriously in Italy. The penance-movement was so successful
that the other great Founder, Dominic, was presently canonised
too (in 1234).
The most natural ambition of the Dominicans, to know that
their Founder was a Saint, set no doubt a certain goal for some
of the leaders. Other impulses, however, underlay the move-
THE THREE AGES 395
ment as a whole. For over thirty years prophetic sayings had
stirred and terrified Italy with words of dread, and the popu
lace here more than in any other region was kept in a state
of continuous excitement in anticipation of the Last Trump.
Abbot Joachim of Flora had introduced the turn of the century
with terrifying visions of the Last Day, which profoundly
influenced the whole thirteenth century till Dante. The
greatest effect was exercised by his remarkable doctrine of the
three ages : the first begins with the Creation of the World and
the creation of Adam ; the second with the birth of Christ ;
the third was just about to dawn. Similar divisions of time
were not new. Joachim, however, referred the three ages to
the Trinity and named the first the Age of the Father, the second
the Age of the Son on which should follow the third, the Age
of the Spirit. As the three members of the Trinity are co
equal it follows that the three ages must be essentially identical
and the courses of the three must correspond. The world
situation at the opening of the third age must resemble that of
the dawn of the first and second, the ages of Creation and
Redemption. This was the same conception as Frederick had
employed in order to place himself on a par with Adam and
with Christ as the bringer of the third and last age.
From this starting point people began to reinterpret the
Bible. If the three ages were exactly to reproduce each other,
the prophets of the Old Covenant who associated all the
terrors of destruction with the coming of the Saviour, must
again be valid for the present age which was once more expect
ing the Messiah. The sayings of Isaiah, Jeremiah and Daniel,
prophesying destruction and salvation, raged once again
through the towns of Italy ; the awe-inspiring visions of John's
Revelation and other apocryphal Apocalypses broke in upon
the terror-stricken world, which took all these sayings as apply
ing to itself and to the immediate future. Abbot Joachim, with
his interpretations of the Apocalypse and the Commentary on
Jeremiah which was ascribed to him, had set the ball rolling,
and in a short time he found innumerable imitators, especially
amongst the mendicant monks. Matters reached such a pitch
that every occurrence on earth was interpreted as the " fulfil
ment " of a Bible dictum, and the chronicles of the mendicants
396 PENANCE EPIDEMIC vi
are full of such interpretations : this and that word of Scripture
was accomplished in this and that event, the Law has been
fulfilled. When Frederick II announced that he had come to
fulfil the Law, and found the salvation of the world in the ful
filment of the Law, he was speaking to an age that was craving
this fulfilment.
Where Abbot Joachim's sayings were insufficient other
joachite promises and interpretations were "speedily .invented.
Genuine and false sibylline verses, magic sayings of Merlin,
prophecies of Michael Scot, oriental oracles, Spanish fore
bodings, all contributed to confuse and excite minds which
were already living in terror of the imminent coming of Anti-
Christ, the End of the World and the Day of Judgment, and
were yet buoyed up by lingering hopes of the approach of the
Messiah, the peace of the world and the golden age of Apollo.
For though Anti-Christ would woefully assail the Church he
would yet be overcome by the effective intervention of an
Order, living a life of Apostolic simplicity. Such was the
promise. And not long after Abbot Joachim Francis of
Assisi made his appearance : the fulfilment of the prophecy.
With similar weapons Dominic took up the war against here
tics. In Padua Anthony was worshipped as a Saint. The
Italian people were thirsting for peace and weary of never-
ending feuds. In this time of crisis and confusion, tortured
with the throes of a new birth, all spiritual and other forces
were tense and at fever heat, and men fell an eager prey to any
miracle that promised easier and better things. In the midst
of all this the preachers appeared everywhere simultaneously,
calling to penance, and coupling their terrifying words with the
message of peace they stung the people to raving and madness.
The epidemic spread like wildfire. "All were drunk with
heavenly love, for they had quaffed of the wine of the spirit of
God after testing which all flesh begins to rave." The peace
and penance mania of the year 1233 is known as the " Great
Halleluja ! " because the penance-preachers overran the country
with this cry in praise of the Three-in-One. Externally it was
everywhere the same. In Parma a preacher appeared in fan
tastic garb who belonged to no Order : wearing a black beard
and with a high Armenian cap on his head, shrouded in a
1233 GREAT HALLELUJA 397
sacklike garment and bearing a gigantic red cross on breast
and back. The brother played on a little copper trumpet,
from which he drew now sweet now terrifying sounds. He
lured the people, especially children, after him like the Pied
Piper of Hamelin. They followed with boughs and burning
tapers through streets and market-places, joining loudly in the
brother's Halleluja. On his arrival all enmities were suddenly
forgotten, all battles abandoned : " A time of happiness and
joy began ; knights and people, burghers and peasants struck
up hymns and songs in praise of God ; people fell on each
other's necks, there was no wrath, no strife, no confusion : only
Love and Peace."
Almost the whole of Italy fell under the spell of the Halle
luja. Sicily was an exception : one such penance-monger was
ejected across the border by imperial officials. Florence also
greeted these proceedings with witticism and merriment, and
met the miracle-working of the preachers with practical jokes.
In Milan the multitude was led by the Dominican Peter of
Verona, the same who was later murdered and honoured by the
title of " Martyr " ; in Piacenza by Leo the Franciscan ; the
Dominican, John of Vicenza, worked north from Bologna up
wards, and in Parma Brother Gerard, a Minorite, took the
apostolic office, performing many miracles. Another Minorite
brother, Salimbene of Parma, relates vividly the manner of these
miracles. Every here and there all the great preachers must
have held conferences and agreed on the day, hour, place and
theme of their sermons, and then gone their several ways
and preached. " There stood Brother Gerard in the Piazza
of Parma on a wooden stair which he had had made for his
addresses as I saw with my very eyes, and while the people
hearkened he ceased and drew his hood over his head, as
if he sank himself in God. After a long time, to the admira
tion of the people, he removed the hood and continued his
speaking, as who should say ' I was in the spirit on the Lord's
day.' " And then he informed the amazed populace he had
been hearing Brother John in Bologna speaking on such and
such a text, and Brother Leo on such another. The people
of Parma assured themselves by messengers of the truth of his
visions and many entered the Order. What the preachers
398 JOHN OF VICENZA vi
achieved, by whatever means, was, in fact, a complete and
sudden cessation of all hostilities.
In some towns matters went so far that mendicant monks
snatched the reins of authority, like the Dominican Savonarola
250 years later, and ruled according to mendicant principles.
The Minorite Brother Gerard, who was an admirer and sup
porter of Frederick II, did so in Parma, for instance, and Brother
John of Vicenza, the Emperor's foe, who was worshipped as a
saint in Bologna, cast the whole town under a spell, and there
upon continued his campaign of peace in the March of Treviso.
Finally, at Verona he mounted the carroccio of the town and
preached to the multitude who streamed in from Padua,
Treviso, Ferrara and Mantua ; thousands were assembled,
who acclaimed him Duke and Rector of Verona. None dared
oppose the will of the excited populace and their leader. The
authorities were impotent. In a moment the rule of Eccelino
in Verona was at an end : he, c< Satan in person," was compelled
to swear obedience to the Brother, and did so with tears in his
eyes — tears of emotion, opined the multitude.
The service of penance of 1233 was only a foretaste of the
much wilder and more savage outburst of the Flagellants in
1260 after Frederick's death, fanatic figures who are not far
removed from the cycle of legend that centres round Frederick.
For the still living Emperor the Great Halleluja had the most
inconvenient political consequences. The only person who
profited was Pope Gregory. With the loss of Verona Frede
rick had again lost his mountain pass ; the Pope had seized this
opportunity of making peace with the Romans. He was now
triumphant in Rome without the Emperor's help, and had now
not the smallest intention of meeting Frederick half-way in the
Lombard question, just at the moment when it was peculiarly
acute. The Lombards did not stand by their concessions,
and though the Pope did not accede to their more outrageous
demands he evolved an expedient. He revived in essentials
the treaty, none too favourable to Frederick, that had been con
cluded by his predecessor Honorius III, and instead of achiev
ing a settlement everything was, as before, in the melting-pot.
This procedure of the Pope's stirred to bitterness and resent
ment not only Frederick but several of the Cardinals. The
'ADVOCATUS' OF ROME 399
Cardinals made no secret of their feelings ; they refused to
follow Gregory to Rome, but remained in Anagni, and when
the Pope returned to Anagni they immediately betook them
selves to Rieti. To everyone's amazement the Emperor,
though not recognising the League, acquiesced in the Pope's
proposals, partly for expediency, partly because he had other
schemes brewing. He had not yet received satisfaction for the
interference with his Diet.
The Halleluja came to an abrupt conclusion. At the last
and greatest feast of peace in Paquera 400,000 North Italians,
it was computed, assembled round Brother John of Vicenza.
Solemnly a pact of eternal peace was sworn. Four days later
in Lombardy and the March of Treviso the war of the towns
broke out again. All flew at each other's throats, and Brother
John, " Duke " of Verona, sat in the dungeon of one of his
innumerable foes. The balance between Emperor and Pope
was gradually restored when the Romans had sobered again
after their orgy of peace. In 1234 Luca Savelli was elected
Senator of Rome. He declared papal Tuscany and the
Carnpagna to be the property of the Roman people, and he
demanded homage from the towns of these areas. The Pope
fled to Rieti, and excommunicated the Romans, who were
looting the Lateran and the cardinals' houses, and called the
whole Christian world to his relief.
Now was Frederick's opportunity. In the sight of the
whole world he could pose as Advocatus of Rome and Pro
tector of the Pope. He could draw the temporal sword to
defend the Church, exactly as world-ideals demanded, exactly
as he had pictured in his recent letter to the Pope. He offered
active assistance to the Pope and joined him in Rieti, taking
his six-year-old son Conrad with him to hand over to the Pope
as a hostage for the purity of his motives. Then he entered
Viterbo with his troops to besiege the Roman fortress of
Rispampani from this base. The gesture was here the thing.
The Pope, of course, could not accept the hostage, and the Em
peror, who had no desire for a fight with the Romans, preferred
to loose his falcons in the Campagna and hunt in papal purlieus.
400 KING HENRY VII vi
As the siege grew protracted he returned to Sicily, while his
troops, after a while, forced the Romans to make peace. The
Emperor had accomplished all he wanted. It was no trifle.
The latest news from Germany indicated that the moment
had arrived to assign to the Pope his role in the coming
events.
The Sicilian Book of Laws depicted the Emperor as Fate
itself. The Emperor's own son was the first victim. Since the
day when King Henry opposed his father's wishes by absent
ing himself on the first occasion from Ravenna his fate had
been sealed ; slowly, steadily, inevitably he moved towards his
doom. When decision was forced on him at Cividale he had
no choice but to bow unconditionally before his father's might,
to swear obedience, and to treat the princes with respect. When
once he had returned to Germany he felt the full pressure of
the fetters he had donned. He sought, cautiously at first, to
slip them from him. It was not long till circumstances
compelled him to defy Princes, Pope and Emperor. There is
no riddle here to read ! In forfeiting his father's confidence he
had forfeited his own freedom of action. Spied upon by a host
of hirelings, looked upon with suspicion and often thwarted by
the Emperor, the very aimlessness of his movements often lent
them a compromising air. Henry himself felt insecure, he
gave orders, countermanded them ; whatever he did, right or
wrong, turned at once to his own destruction.
It is unnecessary here to pursue in detail the successive
phases of his fall. One episode will show the luckless star
under which the young king sailed. Roughly about the time
that the Hallelujas of the penance preachers were echoing
through the towns of Northern Italy, the German Inquisitor,
Conrad of Marburg, a narrow gloomy fanatic, distinguished
himself in the papal service as a heretic-hunter. The chief
German heretics appear to have been the various sects of
Luciferians who magnified Satan as the Creator. The
Emperor, in the edicts we already know, had commanded the
eradication of heresy, and King Henry and the German princes
were at first whole-heartedly on the side of the Inquisition.
Before long, however, Conrad of Marburg began to behave like
an irresponsible maniac ; he accepted every denunciation and
AN ILL-STARRED PRINCE 401
accusation as a proof of guilt ; he declared burghers heretics
and flung them to the flames till the Rhine towns gazed in
paralysed horror at his rage, not knowing how to avert it.
Finally, Conrad without rhyme or reason accused several of the
German nobles of heresy : the Counts of Arnsberg and Solms,
and, especially, Henry of Sayn, thus trespassing on the juris
diction of the bishops. At this point King Henry, with the
concurrence of the princes, called a halt to the increasingly
savage behaviour of the Inquisitor and sent a protest to the Pope
in Rome. This document unfortunately reached Pope Gregory
at the same moment as the news that Conrad of Marburg had
meantime been murdered by embittered enemies. The Pope,
in a fury, tore up King Henry's letter. In the meantime
Henry at a Diet in Frankfurt had declared himself opposed to
all such courts as Conrad's, and had complained that the Bishop
of Hildesheim was preaching a heretic-crusade.
In all this the King's procedure had been above reproach,
but the fact that he should just at this moment draw down on
himself the Pope's wrath was in the highest degree inopportune
for the Emperor. Just at this moment the consequences of
the penance epidemic had given the Pope an advantage over
the Emperor, and he had been able to return to Rome, while
Frederick saw his whole position in North Italy undermined
by the activity of the preachers, and he was particularly
anxious to be on good terms with Gregory. He, therefore,
strongly disapproved of his son's course. At the same time
Bong Henry had most unhappily mixed himself up in almost
treasonable doings, had made friends with the Emperor's
enemies, and had contrived, most unjustly, to injure his father's
special friends, the brothers Godfrey and Conrad of Hohen-
lohe, and the Margrave of Baden. Finally, something very
like anarchy was beginning to spread through Germany. The
princes compelled Henry to proclaim a Public Peace : which
altered nothing. Just as Frederick was taking the field against
the Romans the son, after having been severely reproved by his
father, raised the standard of insurrection. He was in Boppard
with a handful of trusty friends, a heterogeneous group of all
ranks, united only by the most various impulses of opposition.
Some townsfolk and ministeriales and a few bishops, such as
402 POPE'S DILEMMA vi
Augsburg, Wiirzburg and Worms, the Abbot of Fulda, and a
few secular lords, were on his side. It is hard to see what suc
cess King Henry can have hoped for. The Emperor had all
the real power behind him, the Princes and the Pope. Frede
rick designated his son's behaviour as " boyish defiance/' and
his son as " a madman who imagined he could hold the nor
thern throne in our despite." It was really an act of utter
despair when Henry was tempted to a further and final folly.
In the late autumn of 1234, in order to hinder or delay the
Emperor's return to Germany, he allied himself with the deadly
enemies of his father and his forefathers and of the whole house
of Hohenstaufen : with Milan and the confederate Lombard
towns. After this no accommodation was possible.
King Henry could no longer stem the tide of events. Frede
rick II wrote once : " The power of the Empire takes no ac
count of individuals. . . ." Foreseeing the future he had long
since prepared the net for his son, he now drew it slowly in,
mesh by mesh, without speed or haste. King Henry's alliance
with the Lombards was rendered valueless before it was con
cluded. When the first disturbing rumours from Germany
reached Frederick, just as he was visiting the Pope in Rieti, and
offering his youngest son as a hostage, he himself negotiated the
excommunication of his eldest. Pope Gregory IX was pleased,
only too eager, to accede to Frederick's wish, and issued the
papal ban. With that move Gregory lost the game. He sat
firm in the Emperor's snare just when he was preparing a trap
for Frederick. For when the alliance of his Lombard friends,
Milan and her train, with King Henry became known, the Pope
was in an extremely delicate position. He could not join this
Lombard- German conspiracy to overthrow the Emperor or
gravely endanger him, for by his excommunication of King
Henry he had declared himself his enemy. Far from being
able to stand by the Lombards he ought by rights to have
damned them also as the allies of the excommunicated king.
He did not go quite so far as this ; nor did the Emperor press
the point. Frederick, however, was not slow to take advantage
of the Pope's embarrassment. It was impossible now for the
Pope to uphold his Lombard friends, guilty of high treason.
Frederick could find no delegate more apt to his purpose than
FREDERICK IN GERMANY 403
the astonished Pope, so he entrusted to the faithful hands of
the High Priest himself the task of exacting satisfaction and
inflicting punishment for the new treachery of the League,
which could not this time be explained away. The Pope was
paying dearly for Frederick's help against the Romans. And
Frederick could set out for Germany with an easy mind. He
had already written to the German nobles " there is no doubt
of our fortunate arrival.5'
The news of the Emperor's arrival in Ratisbon was enough.
The quite considerable insurrection in Germany at once col
lapsed, and King Henry was quickly persuaded by Hermann of
Salza to unconditional surrender. Fear of the 'Judge, though
approaching alone from the south, exercised a paralysing effect.
Without an army, without a train of Sicilian nobles (whom he
dismissed at the frontier), Frederick had set out in the spring
of 1235, using his galleys to convey him from Rimini to
Aquileia, northwards through Friuli and Styria. He took the
seven-year-old Conrad with him and his personal exchequer,
whose coffers he had replenished by a new tax, well knowing
what means would avail him best in Germany. Just as on that
former occasion when the Puer Apuliae arrived almost alone
in Constance to be soon surrounded by thousands, so now the
Emperor's following grew from day to day, and the number of
adherents who streamed to him. As often before, in Germany,
in Syria, in Sicily, Frederick II trusted once again to his per
sonal presence, the glory and the magic of his name. He was
master of the various arts that cast men under a spell, and ac
cording to circumstances used now one method, now another.
In Syria he had captivated the Orientals by learned talk about
mathematics and astronomy ; in Sicily he conjured up the fear
of the Divine Power, incarnate as Law upon the earth, charms
which were too close and immediate to be potent in Germany,
which unfailingly reacted to the magic of the far-away. The
marvel of southern strangeness had helped the Puer Apuliae
whom men called David to victory, and now the great Charle
magne of tale and story seemed bodily risen again, and came
as one of the wise kings of the East, wealthy, magnificent, the
4o4 IMPRESSION ON GERMANY vi
Emperor of the End, with his train of exotic animals — and
conquered once again.
The German chroniclers tell of Frederick's magnificence
with bated breath. " As befits the imperial majesty, he pro
gressed with the utmost pomp, and many quadrigae, chariots,
followed him laden with gold and with silver, with byssus
and with purple, with gems and costly vessels. He had with
him camels, mules, dromedaries, apes and leopards, with
Saracens and dark-skinned Ethopians skilled in arts of many
kinds, who served as guards for his money and his treasure."
All the fairy-tale magnificence of the south, the exotic treasures
and the marvels of his treasury, " of which the west has scanty
store," the Emperor displayed in the towns of the Danube, the
Neckar and the Rhine. And when by chance the uncanny
monarch flung to his leopard-keeper a few commands in Arabic,
the foreign words were not without effect on the people nor on
his train of princes, knights and nobles. This picture of the
Emperor stamped itself indelibly on the German mind : In
the days of Rudolf of Hapsburg a "false Frederick" arose:
he sought to prove his authenticity by possessing three Moorish
attendants and some heavily-laden mules. And the pictures
of the divine majesty in Berthold of Ratisbon's sermons are
unquestionably coloured by memories of that triumphant
imperial progress.
When Frederick with his magnificent escort rode from
Wimpfen into the Swabian Palatinate on one of his noble
Andalusian or Barbary steeds he found that King Henry had
hastened thither before him, to cast himself at his father's
feet. His life was forfeit for insurrection. The Emperor did
not permit his son to enter his presence. Henry was first
compelled to accompany as prisoner his father's triumphal
progress down the Neckar valley to Worms. Frederick was
solemnly welcomed by the people, and twelve bishops waited
at the portals of the cathedral to greet him. The Emperor saw
amongst them Landulf of Worms, one of the chief supporters
of the rebellious king. He ordered him out of his presence and
commanded them to strip his bishop's robes from him. King
Henry was flung into prison, and the troubadours tell that in
the morning when his armour was taken from him he was
SACRIFICE OF FIRST-BORN 405
still singing ; but when at evening they brought him food
he wept.
Not till some days later did Frederick sit in judgment on
his son. In the presence of many nobles, counts and princes,
the Emperor sat enthroned in sacra majestas. King Henry
entered the hall and flung himself at the feet of his judge, and
as a traitor to his sovereign who sues for pardon bowed his
forehead to the ground before the Emperor's unchanging
glance. Amidst an oppressive silence he was obliged to retain
this position for a long time, and no one bade him rise. At last,
on the prayer of several of the princes, the Emperor allowed the
command to be given that he should stand up. Shocked and
bewildered he stood and commended himself to the Emperor's
mercy, renouncing his kingly dignity and all that he possessed.
His submission saved his life, but he had forfeited his freedom.
He had made all hope of this impossible by at first refusing
to surrender the castle of Trifels which his supporters were
defending and in which the crown jewels were lodged ; he had
even attempted flight. He was first imprisoned in Heidelberg
and then despatched to Apulia. Any rebels who had not yet
surrendered were defeated. Frederick showed great leniency
to all; he even took Bishop Landulf into favour again and
released, after a short time, the Lombard envoys captured in
Trifels. Only the son felt the full severity of father, emperor
and judge. For weary years he remained a prisoner in Rocca
San Felice near Melfi ; then he was transferred to Nicastro.
After a further six years of imprisonment he was to be again
transferred. The story is that he was about to be released
but had not yet been so informed. Weary of life and fearing
yet severer treatment King Henry on the road from Nicastro
to his new place of confinement rode his horse over a mountain
precipice. He was thirty years of age. He was buried in the
church of Cosenza in a marble sarcophagus, clad in a shroud of
gold and silver tissue into which eagles* feathers were woven.
A Minorite preached the funeral sermon, according to Apulian
custom, and chose as his text : " Aind Abraham stretched forth
his hand and took the knife to slay his son." The sermon
concluded with a peroration in praise of Justitia, the God of
the State, to whom Frederick had had to sacrifice his first-
406 ISABELLA OF ENGLAND vi
born. We must not forget how severely Frederick himself
suffered. In the mourning letter he wrote when giving orders
for the obsequies there echoes still the sorrow of that judgment
day in Worms, when the father had, to pass sentence on the son
according to his own saying : human nature must of necessity
bow to justice. " The pity of a tender father must yield to
the judgment of the stern judge : we, mourn the doom of our
first-born. Nature bids flow the flood of tears, but% they are
checked by the pain of injury and the inflexibility of justice."
To describe the imperial stay in Germany is to describe a
series of most brilliant festivities. For when the great attain
the summit of their fame they love to hold stately review of all
the forces and the spirits they command. The first celebra
tions honoured the occasion of the Emperor's re-marriage.
Conrad, King of Jerusalem, was now the sole remaining
legitimate heir to the throne, and Frederick determined to
take him a third wife. Pope Gregory, like his predecessors,
chose the bride. She was Isabella, sister of King Henry III
of England. Soon after the Emperor's meeting with Pope
Gregory in Rieti, Piero della Vigna had been despatched to
London to negotiate the marriage treaty. It was a most
important step in view of both home and foreign politics, for
Frederick had hitherto on strictly German grounds always
inclined to the side of France against England, lover of the
Welfs. The marriage with the English Isabella was the first
step in the solemn renunciation which was soon to follow, of
the ancient Welf-Hohenstaufen feud.
While King Henry was still a prisoner in Worms awaiting
his sentence people were already making preparations. It
was the beginning of July, and Isabella had been in Cologne
since May awaiting the Emperor's arrival in Germany.
Matthew Paris, the English chronicler, with the Englishman's
love for the " intimate " details about the great, cannot relate
with sufficient minuteness the whole story of the wedding of
the beautiful young Empress of scarcely twenty-one, scion of
the ancient house of Plantagenet. He begins even before the
engagement. After the English King had given his consent to
1235 WEDDING 407
his sister's wedding the imperial envoys had begged to be
allowed to see the princess, and Isabella was escorted from her
home in the Tower of London to the Palace of Westminster to
show herself to them. They had gazed long upon her with
delight, esteeming her in all ways worthy of the Emperor's bed,
had placed the engagement ring on her finger in Frederick's
name, and greeted her as Empress of the Roman Empire. All
the details are now recorded of her jewellery and the individual
items of her clothing and of her plenishing, down to the gay
silken counterpanes and soft cushions of the bridal bed, and
the cooking pots which were of unalloyed silver, " a thing that
Seemed to all superfluous." Then the Empress's journey and
sea- voyage are described, and especially the festive and joyous
reception which the people of Cologne prepared for her. Tens
of thousands flocked out to welcome her with flowers and palm
branches and music. Riders on Spanish horses had performed
with their lances the nuptial breaking of staves, while in ships
which appeared to sail upon dry land, but were drawn by
horses concealed under silken coverings, the clerks of Cologne
played new airs upon their instruments. The matrons seated
on their balconies sang the praises of the Empress's beauty,
when Isabella at their request laid aside hat and veil and
showed her face. Six weeks later, on the fifteenth of July,
with all conceivable pomp and ceremony, the wedding was
celebrated in Worms.
People told each other with amazement that the Emperor
did not consummate the marriage the first night, but waited
till early the next morning till the hour which the astrologers
had indicated as the most favourable for procreation. Then
Frederick handed over his consort to the care of Saracen
eunuchs (a state measure as important as, but no more signifi
cant than any other) telling her that she was pregnant of a son,
a fact which he also set in writing in a letter to the English King.
In contrast to his predecessors Frederick II looked on his
consorts simply as mothers of his legitimate heirs and succes
sors ; they had no importance as Empresses. His imperial
forefathers, especially in making pious foundations, habitually
drew up their charters in the name of the royal pair : Henry
and Kunigunde for instance, Frederick I and Beatrice, even
4o8 FREDERICK AND WOMEN vi
Henry VI and Constance. With the sole exception of the few
documents relating to marriage settlements the records of
Frederick II, the last Emperor, contain no allusion to his
consorts. Frederick II stands alone, a fact that was not
without influence on his sons. Although he himself frequently
referred to his parents, and celebrated his Divine Mother in
phrases such as no German ruler had ever used before, his
sons called themselves only Dim Augusti Imperatoris Filius,
This cold-blooded attitude to his wives has often been made
responsible for Frederick's " lack of sentiment/7 Be that as it
may : any other relation was unthinkable. For Frederick was
in an unprecedented way on the pinnacle of the world, which
none could share with him. The picture of an imperial pair
was possible for a German Emperor, but inconceivable for a
Tyrant of Sicily or for a Roman Caesar. Even the appearance
of sentiment and domesticity was out of the question for Frede
rick, who could more readily be seen in company with a
Saracen beauty than with his royal consort. The English
King complained that after years of wedlock the Empress had
never worn the crown in public. Enemies accused the Emperor
of imprisoning his wives in the " labyrinth of his Gomorrah "
(that is in his harem, as contrasted with Sodom), rendering
them almost invisible and making them strangers to their
children. This was all true enough. There was no room round
Frederick in which a woman could strike root. All his wives
died after a few years of marriage, and, as far as we know, his
mistresses shared the same fate : none of them survived him.
In the rarefied atmosphere of these brilliant heights no human
being but himself could thrive : none even of his friends could
hold out for long ; no woman could have breathed there.
Hence, the English Isabella, surrounded by her imperial house
hold and dignities, watched by eunuchs, disappeared forthwith
into the " harem."
The happy Hohenstaufen days saw an unprecedented out
burst of artistic creativeness in Germany in which all races in
common found their own characteristic expression : human
forms were created in a perfection never since attained : it is
COURT AT MAINZ 4°9
the only period in which German plastic art spontaneously and
unconsciously approaches the antique. In August 1235, soon
after the wedding festivities of Worms, Kaiser Frederick held a
great Diet at Mainz. Never was the " better nature " of the
Germans, the reconciliation of their great eternal contradictions,
so strikingly realised as on this occasion. This great imperial
celebration must have awakened many memories of that
" incomparable festival " in which Barbarossa celebrated
the sword-investiture of his sons with a noble and chivalrous
ceremonial never before seen in Germany. Barbarossa,
though well over sixty, had himself taken part in the tourna
ment, and was hailed by the minstrels as a new Alexander,
Caesar, King Arthur. The fresh glory of this beginning of
courtly chivalry in Germany was happily symbolised by the
exchange of greeting and handclasp between Henry of Veldeke,
one of the earliest of German singers, and a French troubadour.
The next fifty years, the period of Gottfried and Wolfram and
Walther von der Vogelweide, brought blossoming and promise,
and full in the midst of all this outburst of German genius the
Puer Apuliae was wafted into Germany from the South, and was
caught up and transfigured by its glory. Now Frederick II,
himself in the forties, revisited Germany after twenty years
and found the Springtime over and the moment ripe for him to
garner the first fruits. Now seemed the time to give perman
ence to the beautiful Roman-German form that had been just
evolved, to help it to a still finer perfection, to weld the whole
into a conscious unity : princes and races into one people. To
strengthen and harden into an enduring state, as sculptors then
were fashioning enduring monuments of stone, this German
growth that bore the impress of Rome, neither by cutting it
adrift from Rome nor by abolishing the princely power, but
by persistently inspiring princes and races with the thought and
the spirit of state-building.
Frederick IFs great curia solemnis of Mainz was the begin
ning : law, speech, blood and feudal faith (which here had
more weight than in the south) were the links of the chain the
Roman Caesar forged. He appeared in exotic magnificence
before this dazzling assembly, at which almost without excep
tion all the German princes were for once united, with all
4io LANDPEACE OF MAINZ vi
the solemn dignity pertaining to the God-appointed Provider,
Protector, Preserver of peace and justice. He opened the Diet
with a proclamation of Public Peace, from the opening words
of which there echoes the pride of the Law-giver who for the
first time erects Tables of the Law, " for men throughout all
Germany in private quarrels and in legal suits at present live
according to the age-old traditions and customs and according
to unwritten Law." The Proclamation of the Landpeace of
Mainz contained both old and new laws, and far excelled in
importance all previous pronouncements of the sort. It was to
form the basis of all future imperial legislation, a foundation
which all later lawgivers must build upon, and to which they
must ever and again recur. Town confederations and princes
and kings like Rudolf of Hapsburg, Adolf of Nassau, Albert of
Austria have frequently renewed the Landpeace of Mainz in its
entirety. The nine-and-twenty sections dealt with the juris
diction of princes and bishops, rights of mintage and transport,
the abolition of unjust dues, the prohibition of self-vindication,
the limitation of ordeal by battle, and much else.
The Emperor, as himself the Law, Incarnate, always con
ceived his personal actions as constituting a precedent, he there
fore created an imperial law out of his own sentence of perpetual
imprisonment against his son, and the Landpeace begins with
the decree : " Whatever son shall drive his father out of his
castles or other property, or shall burn it or shall plunder it,
or shall conspire with his father's foes, or plot against his
father's honour or seek his father's destruction . . . that son
shall forfeit property and fief and personal possessions and all
inheritance from father or mother, and neither judge nor
father shall be able to reinstate him, for ever." And it con
tinues with a sinister note ringing through the Middle High
German of the original words : whatsoever son lays hands upon
his father's body or criminally attacks him " he shall be without
honour and without right for ever, so that he may never again
come into his own."
An important innovation, copied from Sicily, was the
installation of an Imperial Grand Justiciar, who was daily
without fee to preside over the High Court and represent the
Emperor. He was to hold office for at least a year, and he was
GERMAN LANGUAGE 411
given the services of a special notary, who must be a layman,
" so that he may pay the penalty " if he does wrong. We can
detect here and there echoes of Sicilian laws, but nothing that
does violence to natural German Law, rather another offshoot
from the same root, clothing itself in forms that have proved
useful elsewhere.
The Proclamation of Mainz was presumably only a prelimi
nary regulation, as in Sicily the Capua Proclamation had been
the forerunner of the great Constitutions of Melfi. Frederick
may well have planned a similar work for Germany. We
know that he had Sicilian High Court Judges in his train, and
that the idea of a great imperial codification of law was in the
air at the time. The English poet, Henry of Avranches, who was
an ardent admirer of the Emperor, adjured him to win ever
lasting renown by publishing a Summa of the numerous
scattered number of imperial laws which should be a companion
to the Pope's Collection of Decretals which Gregory IX had
published a year before.
It was a matter of the highest significance that this " Italian "
Frederick published his proclamation in German, and recorded
it in writing in German, and had it translated from the German
into Latin. It was the first time that German had been utilised
for a proclamation, and the importance of the fact that it was
thus recognised as on an equality with Latin for an edict of the
Roman Emperor needs no emphasis. It proves that this most
Roman of Emperors was also the most German. It was the
beginning of an individuality in the State as a whole (not only
in the subsidiary states), the first record of German law in Ger
man, the first laying aside of the Latin scaffolding as no longer
indispensable to speech.
It would be difficult to overrate this first tentative of Frede
rick's to raise with the co-operation of the princes a German
state structure comparable to the contemporary German achieve
ments in art and literature. This historic Diet was rich in
memorable and symbolic events, but the pan-German legisla
tion might easily rank as the most important of them all, were
its pride of place not disputed by the termination of the age-old
412 END OF A FEUD vi
racial feud of Welf and Waibling. Otto of Liineburg, the Welf
nephew of Kaiser Otto, was present. Frederick announced :
" At this solemn Diet of Mainz, with the princes ranged round
our illustrious throne, Otto of Liineburg hath done us homage,
and unmindful of all hate and harassment that existed between
our forefathers hath placed himself under our protection and
at our service." Frederick confirmed Otto in all his Liineburg
possessions, which he first took over for the Emperor i;i order to
grant them back as an imperial fief. Further, he augmented
the Welf territory by the gift of Brunswick which he had ac
quired by purchase for himself, and created a new dukedom
of Brunswick-Limeburg. When Otto the Welf above the
imperial crucifix placed his hands in Kaiser Frederick's and
swore the oath of allegiance, voluntarily committing himself
and his possessions to the good faith of the Waibling, to whom
he showed respect in every manner possible, Frederick in
return entrusted him with the newly-created dukedom as a
hereditary imperial fief, and solemnly bestowed on the Welf
the banner that custom demanded. The racial feud of earlier
days had become an anachronism in a Germany flooded as far
as the Baltic and the North Sea by the glory of Imperial Rome.
There was no longer Welf nor Waibling in the North. The
age-old prophecy had been literally fulfilled which laid down
the correct constitution for Germany : the Welfs should ever
provide mighty Dukes, but only Waiblings should be Emperors,
Frederick II was well justified in giving command : " This day
shall be recorded in all the annals of the Empire because it has
added another duke to the Empire. . . ." This also gave him
a reason for proceeding next day to the cathedral, crowned with
the imperial diadem, arid after high mass giving a royal feast to
all the German princes and the 12,000 knights of their escorts.
This was the last great imperial feast of the old aristocratic
regime of the Holy Roman Empire, before the onset of a
duller bourgeois world which Frederick was trying to hold
at bay by strengthening the princely power ; a world which
lacked the spaciousness of an Empire, but from its own
narrow confines reached upwards, seeking to win the empire
of the skies.
JEWISH LAW SUIT 413
Frederick had come to Germany as the Judge, showing him
self for the first time in this capacity to all Europe, and pre
sently an opportunity offered to figure as the highest judge of all
the Christian world in a case which aroused much interest and
excitement and which he himself contrived to magnify into an
affair of the whole Occident. It must have been shortly after
the great day of Mainz that the case was brought before him
while he was halting in Hagenau in the imperial Palatinate.
The Jews of Fulda were accused of having committed a ritual
murder on a Christian boy at their Easter festival. The first
result of this was a massacre of Jews in Fulda and several other
German towns. Then the people had waited till the Emperor's
arrival to seek a decision in all the unrest, and both parties,
Jews and Christians, now appealed to Frederick in Hagenau.
As a witness against the Jews the Christians had kept the child's
corpse and dragged it along to Hagenau. Frederick heard the
case and passed a sentence worthy of Solomon. First he pointed
to the body, and said drily to the Christians : " When they are
dead, bury them. It's all they're fit for." He satisfied him
self that the Jews were innocent, but imposed a large fine on
them, because — innocent or guilty — that had been the cause
of a disturbance. Thus peace was restored in Germany.
The case, however, did not end here. The Emperor vowed
if ritual murders were possible he would slay every Jew in the
Empire, and he instituted a full and complete enquiry to
elucidate the truth. His first step was to apply to princes,
nobles, great men, abbots, and various Church dignitaries in
the Empire to ask their opinion. The complete contempt,
however, which the autocrat and the scholar felt for the findings
of such a body finds voice in his ultimate decision : " These
men, being different all, expressed different opinions in the
matter, but showed themselves incompetent to give an adequate
judgment in the case. We, therefore, out of the secret depths
of our own knowledge perceived that the simplest method of
procedure against the Jews, who were alleged guilty of the
aforementioned crime, would be through such men as had been
Jews and had been converted to the Christian faith. They,
being opponents, would not conceal what they might know
against Jews or against the books of Moses or through the
414 A " ROYAL COMMISSION' vi
Old Testament. Now, though we ourselves in our wisdom,
acquired from many books which our Majesty has learned to
know, intelligently consider that the innocence of these Jews
has been proved, yet we are anxious both to satisfy the law and
to appease the unlettered populace. Hence we have decided
with wholesome foresight and in concurrence with the princes,
nobles, great men, abbots and Church dignitaries, to despatch
special messengers to all the kings of the Western lands, and
request them to send us from out their realms the greatest
possible number of newly-baptised who are learned in Jewish
law.'*
This really took place. King Henry III wrote from Windsor
that he had received the Emperor's messenger, an imperial
marshall, joyfully and with honour as was seemly. His illustri
ous and imperial Majesty had earned the king's deepest thanks
since His Majesty had been pleased to impart this hitherto
unheard-of case which had recently occurred in his imperial
territories. So far as in him lay the King of England would
endeavour to meet the imperial desires, and he was therefore
sending the two most eminent of the newly-baptised whom he
had been able to find in England, who would be happy to obey
all imperial commands. The other European monarchs must
have replied in much the same strain. It was a case which
concerned them all. This " royal commission," assuredly the
first that any Emperor ever summoned, expended no little
time in consultations, of whose tenor the Emperor kept himself
exactly informed. Finally, they announced as their certain
conclusion that, as the Emperor had supposed, the Hebrew
scriptures contained no such suggestion, that they rather for
bade all blood sacrifices, and that the Talmud and the Bere-
shith laid heavy penalties on bloody animal sacrifices. On the
basis of this finding the Emperor granted the Jews a pronounce
ment which severely forbade any similar accusation in future
throughout the entire Empire.
Frederick's main purpose in all this inquiry was to summon
as Emperor a judicial court for the western world, and, secondly,
to display before such a gathering his own immense learning,
which he was never at pains to conceal, well knowing that the
European kings would hear of it from their delegates. It made
WINTER IN HAGENAU 415
no small impression in Germany, though in some quarters
they took it ill that the Emperor had given his decision against
the Christians. With what curiosity and amazement these
foreigners must have made the acquaintance of the Emperor
who showed himself not only surrounded by exotic brilliance
and luxury, but who held discussions about the Talmud, who
seemed more completely master of Arabic than of German, and
who gave visible proof of the truth of those reports that he made
use " of these Saracen augurs and soothsayers whom people
call mathematicians and astronomers." Philosopher in those
days meant much the same as wizard and magician, master of
all secret arts, and even amanlike Albertus Magnus was reputed
to deal in magic. Later German legends relate that Kaiser
Frederick visited Albertus in his magic garden at Cologne, as
others tell that Averroes lived at his court. The Germans,
indeed, always felt the Emperor to be somewhat uncanny ; but
their awe was blent on the whole with profound admiration
rather than repugnance, and with a secret yearning to love him.
Frederick II spent the winter in Hagenau, a place he pre
ferred to all the others. He always designated Alsace, in climate
and in customs the most southern German province, as the
favourite of his German hereditary lands. He stayed here
for months with short interruptions, surrounded by numerous
princes, settling quarrels, making agreements, receiving am
bassadors. Some came from Spain, bringing valuable horses,
and the Russian Duke (of Kiev ?) had sent messengers with
gifts. During this period in his own personal German
domains where he was " Lord of the Land " he seems to have
carried through some constitutional measures and at least
established a centralised customs department, probably not
very different from his Sicilian one. Otherwise he occupied
himself with increasing his private and imperial possessions.
With Sicilian money he redeemed certain claims on Swabia
exercised by the King of Bohemia, and he acquired imperial
rights in Uri which were so far important as they gave him the
land at this end of the newly-opened St. Gothard Pass and thus
secured him an alternative passage across the Alps. It was
scarcely possible yet to use the pass for troops to attack Milan
in the rear, for instance. Frederick will have had the ancient
416 LOMBARD SITUATION vi
route over the Septimer or Julier passes in mind when he con
ceived the plan, at the beginning of the Lombard campaign,
of invading Lombardy with two armies at once. The Rhenish
and Low Country knights were to assemble in Basel, and those
who were crossing by the Brenner Pass in Augsburg ; perhaps
the first great strategic conception of the Middle Ages.
The Lombard War could no longer be averted. At Mainz
the German princes had unanimously voted for the campaign
against the Lombards, whose alliance with King Henry was
treachery to the Empire. According to German custom they
pledged themselves by shout and lifted hand, instead of oath,
to be ready for war in the spring. Frederick had not only right
but might on his side. Pope Gregory suddenly found himself
completely deserted. He had informed himself by a courier of
German affairs. His position was desperate. An alliance with
the Emperor against the Lombards meant the strangulation of
the Papacy as a political power : the States of the Church would
be wedged into an imperial Italy and would in all likelihood
soon fall an easy prey to the Emperor. Neither could Gregory
declare openly for the Lombards. They had undeniably
offended in the highest degree against the majesty of the
Empire, and when the Pope sought to treat with them the
towns cared as little about his commands as about the Emperor's.
Gregory himself now began to complain of their " insolence/1
To maintain neutrality was practically to declare for Frederick
and to abandon the towns to the imperial vengeance.
Pope Gregory's first effort was, therefore, directed to trying
to postpone for a little the punishment threatening his Lom
bard friends. There was suddenly nothing so urgently vital
for the Christian world as a new crusade and the regulation of
affairs in general in the Holy Land, where the Christians, to
the Emperor's detriment rather than to that of the Curia,
were mutually fighting each other. The Pope wrote to the
princes still assembled in Mainz and begged them to abandon
the Lombard War for the sake of the Holy Land. He begged
in vain. Frederick would not, in any circumstances, have
consented to breaking the ten years' truce with his friend al
POPE AS ARBITRATOR 417
Kamil, which was not to terminate till 1239. Nevertheless, he
gave the Pope one more chance. If he, as arbitrator, could
persuade the Lombards between the August and Christmas
of 1235 to offer terms satisfying to the honour of Emperor
and Empire no armed intervention need take place. Where
upon Pope Gregory made the utterly impossible demand that
Frederick should pledge himself beforehand to accept uncon
ditionally the Pope's award in the matter, whatever it might be.
The Emperor, in view of his previous experience, returned an
emphatic refusal, but sent the German Grand Master as nego
tiator to the Pope, to rejoin Piero della Vigna who had been
for a long time in charge of the imperial cause in Rome.
Hermann of Salza now began his great r61e of go-between.
He enjoyed a high reputation with Pope Gregory, who always
recognised his honourable disinterestedness, and he was almost
Frederick's friend. The Pope had untruthfully asserted the
Lombards' unconditional readiness to abide by his arbitration,
but week after week the Grand Master awaited their messengers
in vain. At length he returned to his master — not wholly
empty-handed. Pope Gregory had been endeavouring to wean
Verona from her imperial allegiance by suddenly installing
there, without the shadow of right, a papal podesta. Hermann
of Salza, accompanied by the imperial legate, Gebhard of Arn-
stein, had arrived in the nick of time, and rescued the most
important town for the Emperor, of which Gebhard now took
control. No sooner had Hermann quitted Italy than the
ambassadors of the Lombard League appeared before the Pope,
in no wise minded to submit. Gregory despatched an express
messenger to urge the Grand Master's return ! Hermann of
Salza's reply was that his master's orders were to proceed> and
he went on his way to Germany. The period allotted by
Frederick II had meantime run out, and all hope of peace was
wrecked by the intransigeance of the Lombards, who were fully
aware how dire was the Pope's need of them and took liberties
with the Curia accordingly.
Pope Gregory now had recourse to another weapon which
had served him at the time of Frederick's first excommunica
tion. Then the real cause of friction, the delay of the Crusade,
was pushed into the background and Sicilian politics were made
4i8 TENSION vi
the rock of offence. Similarly now the Pope dropped the
Lombard question. He unexpectedly made complaints about
the conduct of Sicilian officials, about Sicilian taxes on churches
and clerics, about the Saracen colony of Lucera, and other
kindred topics : he joined battle on another field. The com
plaints now raised bore no relation to the burning Lombard
question and, right or wrong, had not arisen since Frederick had
quitted Sicily in complete harmony with the Pope a few months
ago. As if nothing had been on the tapis for a long time past
but the state of affairs in Sicily, Pope Gregory closed his letter
with the ominous words : " We can no longer lock such matters
in our breast without injury to the majesty of God, without
detriment to our reputation and our conscience."
Ere long a second letter followed. This time it was the
CruSade which had to serve the Pope's turn. Pope Gregory
suddenly found it absolutely essential and wrote in conclusion :
" The Church cannot, with equanimity, be a witness of any
oppressive measures towards the Lombards, who have trusted
themselves to her protection, for in this way the Crusade is
being delayed. ... In a case where the glory of the Redeemer
is at stake the Pope cannot be a respecter of persons.". . .
This was the flimsiest of pretexts. When the Crusade later was
in progress, and it seemed that the result might strengthen the
Emperor, Pope Gregory was the first to prevent its setting forth.
The German princes were solid behind Frederick, and this
time the Pope had tried their patience once too often. In a
letter of unspeakable bitterness Frederick goes through the
Sicilian complaints point by point and seeks to refute them.
But even if, in his absence, irregularities had taken place, it
was not possible for him from Germany to keep the eyes of a
lynx on his Sicilian kingdom and make himself heard there in
the thunder ! He would be coming soon enough to Italy, and
would then be ready to discuss such matters. The imperial
reply to the second letter stated briefly that foreign excursions
were excluded until peace was restored within the Empire.
This cast the die for an imperial campaign against the Lom
bards.
As Frederick's relations with the Roman Curia grew tenser
and more doubtful he seemed to wish visibly to demonstrate
ST. ELIZABETH 419
once more the essential unity of Church and Empire, Emperor
and Pope. At his coronation in Aix as a mere boy he had set
the seal of sanctity on his German-Roman kingdom by unex
pectedly taking the Cross and by the solemn re-interment of
the sainted Charlemagne. Now that he was about to leave
Germany he closed the circle with a kindred ceremony. He
went to Marburg to exhume and re-inter the childlike St.
Elizabeth, Landgravine of Thuringia.
St. Elizabeth, the chaste and beautiful princess of the
Wartburg, is still remembered. The greatest miracle she
wrought was to combine a tender love for husband and children
with a life devoted to the poor and the sick ; to temper dignity
and pride of race with gentleness and humility. The memory
of the penitent of Marburg, clad in the robe of a Brother Minor,
girt with a cord, flogging herself, is forgotten in the picture of
the gracious lady. Elizabeth was a daughter of the King of
Hungary, she had spent her childhood at the Thuringian court
and was, at an early age, betrothed to the Landgrave Lewis.
Later centuries related miracles of her childish days. The
generous-hearted girl had filled a basket with food for the poor ;
some one reproved her severely for her generosity, and lo !
beneath its covering cloth the basket was full of fragrant roses.
When Elizabeth first met the disciples of Francis of Assisi
in Eisenach she was fifteen years old. The teaching of the
Tuscan-Umbrian saint fell on well-prepared soil. His demand
for chastity and humility, and above all for poverty, pointed
the path which the princess resolved to tread when presently
she found herself a widow. Landgrave Lewis had always
been benevolently tolerant to her enthusiasms, and when
he fell a victim to the plague in Brindisi on his way to Frederick
IFs Crusade, Elizabeth ardently desired to exchange her life
as a princess for that of a beggar woman. Her confessor was
Conrad of Marburg, the same who, after her death, developed
into the nightmare-haunted fanatic of the Inquisition. He
persuaded her to avoid excess. She quitted the Wartburg,
renounced her children, and built herself a hut of wood and
mud, as St. Francis had commanded his followers to do ; but
420 RE-INTERMENT vi
she retained her princely rank and used her widow's riches to
help and to feed the poor and suffering. She housed diseased
and leprous children, washed their wounds and cared for them,
and even kissed them, overcoming her revulsion with a smile.
One Good Friday in an ecstacy she was granted heavenly visions.
She did not abandon herself to visions, however, still less gave
them publicity and she claimed no miracles in her short life of
twenty-four years. When she was about to die, and lay on her
pallet in an intensity of joy, people said that the sweetest sounds
of angelic music were heard from her throat though her lips
were tightly closed. The very day after her burial the saint
began to work miracles, and people came from far to secure
scraps of her garment, of her hair and nails as relics. Not long
afterwards the Pope canonised her at the request of Land
grave Conrad of Thuringia, who himself entered the Teutonic
Order. Kaiser Frederick came to Marburg in May 1236 to
give his sainted kinswoman royal burial.
An uncounted multitude — people spoke of twelve hundred
thousand ! — had streamed into Marburg when Frederick II,
in the presence of many bishops and princes and especially
knights of the Teutonic Order, lifted the first stone from the
grave of the young saint. Forthwith from the sacred body oil
began to flow, which the Teutonic knights collected and dis
tributed to churches and monasteries. The corpse was then
enclosed in an oaken casket overlaid with skilfully wrought gold,
and richly adorned with silver figures and antique gems.
Frederick presented the saint with the golden beaker from
which he was wont to drink, and crowned the head of the
Landgravine with a golden crown, thus doing homage to the
saint and princess, his kinswoman. The foundation stone of
the Church of St. Elizabeth in Marburg was laid at this time ;
its stained-glass windows represent their patron saint as the
daughter of the Queen of Heaven, receiving a crown from
the Virgin Mother, while St. Francis at her side is being
crowned by the Son of God himself. They give no picture
of the barefoot servant of the poor, clad in white flowing
garments, distributing alms.
Frederick's interest in the exhumation of any chance mendi
cant saint would have been scarcely seemly. People seem to
1236 " EXECUTION OF JUSTICE" 421
have hinted this, for Frederick defends himself against the
innuendo that his homage was paid less to the saint than to
the princely kinswoman. The two things — he wrote — are not
easy to dissociate : " For it fills us with joy to know that our
Saviour, Jesus of Nazareth, was a shoot of King David's royal
stem ; and the tables of the Old Testament bear witness that
the Ark of the Covenant might be touched only by the hand
of the nobly-born." Thus Frederick expressed himself in a
letter about the Marburg ceremonies to the Minister-General
of the Franciscan Order.
Marburg marked the close of this German period. They
were days of solemn festival, happy days of brilliance and of
peace, a peace which lay over the whole of Germany and over
almost all the lands of the Roman Empire. An atmosphere
of world peace prevailed ; the chroniclers report an over
whelming wine harvest and a mild warm winter ; all signs
which seemed to prove that the Prince of Peace, the Emperor
ofjustitia, was reigning. It might well seem so, for Frederick
had always succeeded in conquering without weapons ; all the
great successes that had raised him to these heights had been
won by peaceful means, at most by a threatening gesture.
If the Lechfeld this summer was echoing to the clash of arms
as the warriors assembled round their Emperor this army was
to bring the world the gift of peace. The Emperor called the
coming campaign an " Execution of Justice," and he failed
to understand how Pope Gregory could damn with so ugly
a word as " war " the " peace-restoring intentions " of the
imperial Judge. The peace which God designed to fill the
world under the Emperor of Justice was nigh at hand, dis
turbance flickered here and there only in the Lombard corner.
It was now his duty to bring peace to this quarter also, this easily-
excited, bloodthirsty region which had brought on itself the
punishment of the Judge and the Avenger. He was bringing
peace with the sword — but only because the Lombards would
not have it otherwise.
All the Emperor's letters at this time are full of similar
statements : the ten or twelve towns of the Lombard League
422 WAR vi
are the disturbers of the peace, and the task has been assigned
to the Emperor by God to compel them to repose. " In the
eastern world the kingdom of Jerusalem, the inheritance on
his mother's side of Conrad, our most well-beloved son, is,
in obedience to the will of heaven, steadfast in its loyalty to
our name ; and the Kingdom of Sicily no less, the glorious
inheritance of our mother's race, and also the mighty overlord-
ship of Germania. We therefore believe that the Providence
of the Redeemer has guided our steps so mightily and won-
drously to this one end alone, that we should bring back to its
allegiance towards our illustrious throne that centre of Italy
which is on all sides surrounded by our strength, and that we
should thus restore the Empire's unity." The conquest of
Lombardy, that centre of the Empire, has been set him as a
task by Providence, and God has directed his steps towards the
goal. " We believe therefore that we are rendering the most
welcome service to the living God when we think the more
joyfully on the peace of the whole Empire as we more clearly
read the portents which indicate the heavenly will/'
It is rare to find Frederick thus expounding his political
actions. This one instance is all the more illuminating. The
punitive campaign against the Lombards is in the Judge's eyes
a service to God, and happily that which God has foreordained
corresponds remarkably with the passionate personal impulse
of the Emperor. He can fulfil the divine purpose and renew
the peace of the peoples, and gratify at one and the same time
his ancient, inborn hatred of Milan. He writes to the King of
France : " No sooner had we, in the years of our ripening
adolescence, in the glowing power of mind and body ascended
the highest peaks of the Roman Empire against all expectations
of men and by the aid of Divine Providence alone . . . than all
the acuteness of our mind was continually directed to one end
... to avenge the injury offered (by the Milanese) to our Father
and to our Grandfather, and to trample under foot the offshoots
of abhorred freedom, already carefully cultivated in other places
also." Such hate has in it something Providential, something
God-intended. Everything therefore points to one goal : Provi
dence, the world's weal, and personal impulse : peace must be
imposed on the Lombards.
SYMPATHY OF THE KINGS 423
The Lombard war against heretics and rebels becomes no
less a Holy War than a Crusade to the Holy Land, and it is
again inconceivable to the Emperor why Pope Gregory should
arrest the arm of imperial justice. The completion of his
purpose is the first pre-requisite for fighting in Syria : " For
on our side we have frankly no other aim behind our procedure
than to take up the cause of the Crucified One. This, however,
cannot occur until the peoples round are by the might of
Justice reduced to peace." So he wrote to King Louis of
France, and on other occasions he resolutely denied that he was
waging war for his own advantage : " When once the discord
in the bosom of this Italy is triumphantly brought to an end, to
the glory of God and of the Empire, we hope to be able to lead
forth a powerful army to the Holy Land." Had the Emperor
here other things in mind ? Those prophecies perhaps which
had often been interpreted as referring to him, the redeemer
of the Holy Sepulchre ? That after the pacification of the
West the Messiah-Emperor should return to the East, and there
in the Holy of Holies lay aside the Crown of all the World, and
hang up lance and shield on the dry tree as a token of the last
Judgment ? Did Frederick hope literally to fulfil this prophecy
also ?
Frederick took extremely good care not expressly to say this,
nor to bind himself too exacliy. The nearness of the Last
Day, however, and the Empire of Peace are implicit in all he
said. It was a question of peace . . . not only the peace of the
actual Roman Empire but in this fulness of time the peace of the
whole Christian world. The Lombard war, therefore, con
cerned the world. The Emperor invited the ambassadors
of all the kings of Europe to a Lombard Diet in Piacenza
in order, in common with them, to reduce the few remaining
disturbers of the world's peace — behind whom, though not
always openly, the Pope had taken his stand. Frederick
had struck the right note. Europe's Christian kings now rallied
to his side, though they did not send their armed assistance till
his success in the war was assured. The King of England
wrote : he would have preferred to gird on his sword and come
himself. At the same time he spontaneously sent letters, in
which he expressed himself very forcibly about the Lombards'
424 BELA OF HUNGARY vi
arrogance, to the Pope and some friends of his who were
Cardinals : they really ought to take up the Emperor's cause
against the confederate towns. Even more emphatic was the
document which King Bela of Hungary directed to the Pope
in the June of this year 1236 : he had heard that the insolence
of the Lombards was seeking to induce the Pope on the pre
text of necessary service for the cause of the Holy Land to
oppose the imperial measures for strengthening the Empire.
He would beg the Pope not to give ear to the Lombards.
Unquenchable dissension between Empire and Papacy would
be the consequence. He added that such an encroachment by
the Pope on the secular rights of the princes would be a
warning to himself and to the other princes of Europe.
These manly words of the Hungarian King show how warmly
the other western monarchs felt the Emperor's cause to be
their own, and show also how high Frederick's reputation stood
amongst them ; he is felt to be by far the first amongst them,
not in virtue only of his imperial crown but in virtue of his
actual strength. It now became the ultimate political goal of
the Empire to cement the unity of the Christian kings of the
west. There was nothing insincere in his statement, just on
the eve of the greatest display of his power : " More than ever
the whole world lives by the breath of the Empire ; grows
feeble if the Empire is enfeebled, and rejoices when the
Empire thrives." Again : " The Roman Empire must strive
the more earnestly for peace, must the more urgently devote
itself to establishing justice among the peoples, because it stands
before all the governments of the world, as before a mirror."
Now that his goal is an Empire of Peace, now that the aurea
aetas beckons, the Emperor feels himself more than ever as
Justice incarnate, and uses the phrase " our Justice " as synony
mous with " our illustrious majesty." He is about to arm
" his Justice," and the Lombards shall see his face which he
would fain have shown them in peace, and " they shall not be
able to look on it unmoved, from fear before Justitia" Hitherto
Justitia has been the organising and regulating power leading
men in the path of reason, now for the first time it becomes
the punishing and avenging force that works for world peace
and perfect world order. Another ten years will pass and
WOOING ROMANS 4*5
avenging Justice, filled with hate, shall rage solely for its own
ends through the length of Italy.
Hopes of a world peace and the conception of a universal
Roman Empire find expression at this time in yet other
contexts. Frederick writes some remarkable letters to the
populace of Rome. These are all full of the belief that the
fulness of time is at hand and the world is about to be renewed.
Renewal would mean reconstruction of the world in exactly
the state in which it stood at the moment of the Redemp
tion in the days of Augustus. The Messiah-Emperor who is
expected and who shall set up an Empire of Justice must show
himself the revivifier of the ancient Roman Empire, the re
incarnation of Augustus, Prince of Peace, restoring imperial
Rome to her old position in the world.
As early as Barbarossa's day the Arch Poet, like his predeces
sors, had sung of this " Renovatio " expected from Roman Law
and from his Emperor :
Iterum describitur orbis ab Augusto,
Redditur res publica statui vetusto,
Pax terras ingreditur habitu vemisto,
Et iam non opprimitur iustus ab iniusto.
All the preconceptions which lent a tangible reality to the
expected Messianic King : the tone and manner of the ancient
Caesars and of the Augusti were adopted by Frederick when
writing his magniloquent letters to the Romans to shake into
wakefulness these people " all too content with the shadow of a
great name," " to arouse this later posterity to scale once more
the peaks of their ancient greatness." The Emperor's words
fell resonantly on the Romans' ears : between domestic cares
and enervating self-indulgence they have forgotten their mighty
past, " Behold, the arrogance of Milan has set up a throne in
Northern Italy, and not content to be Rome's equal, she has
challenged the Roman Empire. Behold these folk who were
bound of old to pay you tribute — so men say — fling insults at
you in the tribute's stead. How sore unlike the deeds of your
forefathers and the virtues of the ancients ! . . . that one town
alone should dare to bid defiance to the Empire of Rome. In
olden days the Romans were not content to subdue their neigh
bours only, they conquered all provinces, they possessed far
426 "ARMA ET LEGES " vi
distant Spain, they laid fair Carthage in ruins ! " The con
trast between the old Rome and the new, he continued, amazed
all who had heard the fame of Rome or had read the monu
ments of the past and looked now upon the present. And
thinking of the Roman communes the Emperor writes : " Ye
reply perhaps that Kings and Caesars accomplished these
great deeds. Behold, ye also have a King and Caesar who has
offered his person for the greater glory of the Roman Empire,
who has opened his treasuries and has not spared his travail !
Ye have a king who with his constant calling stirs you from
your slumbers. . . ."
In these ways the Emperor sought to arouse all the mental
powers of the time, that the world might see what was at stake
when he drew the sword against the Lombards. They were
opposing the clearly-manifested aims of God : a world peace
and an Empire of Justitia. Frederick was, therefore, justified
in proclaiming that the Lombard rebels were in revolt, not only
against him, the Emperor, but directly against God, against
the Catholic faith, against Nature. He himself spoke very
cautiously and only of his imperial peace mission, adding but
one phrase : " The glory of the Emperor's sceptre shines out
from Rome across the darkness not in temporal affairs alone"
His friends in Italy, however, lauded the coming " Deliverer."
Piero della Vigna addressed the people of Piacenza, announced
the Emperor's impending arrival and, not wholly by accident,
nor yet wholly by design, he took as his text the prophecy of
Isaiah which recurs in the Gospel for Christmas Day : " The
people that walked in darkness have seen a great light : they
that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath
the light shined."
Such were the signs and tokens under which Frederick II
metamorphosed himself from Law Giver into Leader of
Armies and prepared men's minds for his appearance in the
new part, fulfilling the formula of the Caesars : arma et leges.
He had called the approaching campaign an " Execution of
Justice," and this conception made serious strategy impossible,
for the armies were only an instrument of the Judge to punish
MEDIEVAL STRATEGY 427
law-breakers and rebels. Frederick had no large continuous
stretch of territory to conquer. Like all medieval rulers he
lacked space, and he lacked foes against whom to carry out cam
paigns in the style of Alexander, Hannibal or Julius Caesar.
The Middle Ages saw on occasion kings and princes at the head
of their armies, but — except perhaps in Byzantium — knew no
generals, no strategists on a large scale. Any brave man could
head an army, a cardinal or justiciar as well as a king, and none
could be a good general or a bad general, because there was no
art of war. An art of war began slowly to be evolved when the
days of the condottieri came and the professional armies. The
endless fighting of the preceding ten years had developed
Frederick's army till it was showing indications of becoming a
professional one : the troops serving as feudal levies became
gradually subsidiary to the soldiers recruited and paid directly
by the Emperor. Frederick showed the adaptability of all
great men by developing into something of a condottiere him
self. There was no opportunity, however, for great strategic
combinations, whether on his side or his opponents'. In the
Middle Ages every battle was a more or less accidental im
promptu affair, needing an immediate decision. Frederick
used to the full the advantages of speed, surprise, cunning and
superior strength. He could, however, rarely induce the enemy
to risk pitched battles in which they were always defeated.
The siege technique of the day was so imperfect that when they
ensconced themselves behind the stout walls of their fortresses
they could only be starved out, or very occasionally the place
could be carried by storm. These sieges dragged on for many
months and were as far as possible avoided by Frederick, for
the cost of maintaining the besieging forces was enormous.
Compared with the vast conceptions of universal Empire and
universal Papacy the armies of the time seem ludicrously
small. It is the characteristic of the period descending from
the universal and the spiritual to the material, that a very minute
concrete object might be charged with a great idea, and a most
trifling deed with overwhelming spiritual significance. It is
probable that Frederick II never assembled more than twelve
thousand, at the utmost fifteen thousand men, " under the
victorious eagles of the Imperium Romanum." Even this
428 BABENBERG vi
force will have consisted of a heterogeneous assembly of the
most disparate components : German, Italian, Sicilian feudal
knights fighting alongside Saracens, infantry levies from the
loyal towns beside mercenary knights, and archers of the most
miscellaneous origin. The Emperor was probably superior to
the enemy in cavalry, but the confederate armies as a whole
were probably equal to his, and possibly even larger. In open
battle the cavalry invariably won the day, but in siege operations
the heavily armoured knights were valueless.
The army which the Emperor took with him for the campaign
of many months in Lombardy was unwontedly small, even for
those times. He had had to detach a strong German army
against the Duke of Austria. The " Quarrelsome " Babenberg
had not put in an appearance at any of the appointed Diets ;
he had imprisoned imperial ambassadors ; had indulged in
provocative acts against all his neighbour princes, and, finally,
had refused obedience to the Emperor. He had now been
placed under the ban of the Empire, and the King of Bohemia
with the Duke of Bavaria were detailed to enforce the decree.
They were able to overcome him within a few months and drive
him back into his last fortresses. The Emperor had told off
several of his German divisions for this subsidiary campaign so
that at least he need not weaken his Italian troops.
The whole campaign of 1236 which only lasted a few months
was, therefore, only a preliminary canter to clear the air in
Lombardy. Frederick was anxious to have certainty about the
Pope's attitude. He, therefore, begged that since the war was
against heretics, and since there was peace between Empire and
Papacy, the Pope should take a hand, by spiritual proceedings
against the rebels. It was not too much to ask the Curia to
support this punitive campaign. Gregory IX sent no reply.
Taxed with his silence he later wrote that he must have failed
to answer " out of a kind of dreamy forgetfulness, as it were."
Instead, he sent the Emperor a new list of complaints about
the Sicilian government and scarcely alluded to Lombardy.
Finally, when for a moment the Emperor's military progress
seemed to have come to a standstill, the Pope suddenly un
masked, abruptly shattering the dream of unity : " Thou
—he wrote—" the necks of kings and princes bent under
PAPAL ARROGANCE 429
the knee of the priest, and Christian Emperors must subject
their actions not to the Roman Pontiff alone ; they have not
even the right to rank him above another priest." This is the
famous, the notorious phrase of priestly omnipotence, which
Gregory was the first to formulate, and which he launched,
somewhat prematurely, against Frederick II. He far exceeded
the claims made by his predecessors, for he subordinated the
Emperor to every petty cleric, and in matters other than
spiritual. The verdict of the Apostolic See was supreme
throughout the world, declared Pope Gregory, which was the
equivalent of saying that Frederick must submit without pro
test to the Pope's decree in the Lombardy affair, although this
quarrel between the Emperor and the rebels had in the last
resort nothing whatever to do with the Pope. Pope Gregory
derived the right of the Papal See to decide all questions,
especially Italian questions, from that famous forgery, the so-
called " Donation of Constantine." He elaborated : " Con-
stantine, Sole and Only Ruler over all regions of the World, in
agreement with the Senate and People of Rome, who possessed
authority not only over the city but over the whole Roman
Empire, had found it seemly that the Vicegerent of the Prince
of the Apostles who held sway over the priesthood and over the
souls of men, should also possess supreme power over the affairs
and persons of the entire world." And Constantine had be
lieved that he, to whom the conduct of heavenly things had been
on earth entrusted by the Lord, must also lead all earthly
affairs on the bridle of justice. The symbols and the sceptre
of the Empire were, therefore, handed over by Constantine to
the Pope for all time ; the city of Rome with the entire -duchy,
and also the Empire, for ever placed under his jurisdiction.
Constantine had placed Italy completely at the disposal of the
Apostolic Chair, and sought himself a new residence in Greece.
For it seemed to him unseemly Jo possess power as earthly
Emperor where the Head of the Christian faith sat on the
throne on which the heavenly Emperor had placed him. With
out in the least impairing the quality of its judicial supremacy
the Apostolic See had transferred the Empire to the Germans,
to Charlemagne, and had granted him the power of the sword
by his coronation and anointing.
430 TWO FORTRESSES TAKEN vi
We need not here further pursue the papal doctrine. For the
moment it served Pope Gregory to claim that his award in all
Italian disputes was final and binding even against the Emperor.
Frederick found it superfluous to answer this letter. If he
had had any doubts before, he now knew where he was. What
need of words ! No doctrine of the judicial supremacy of Pope
or Emperor, no theories of papal overlordship in Italy or in the
Empire could argue away the fact that the Lombards in con
spiring with King Henry had been guilty of high treason. The
negotiations which Hermann of Salza was conducting with
the Pope might drag on to the accompaniment of military
campaigns. In this affair only deeds could decide.
In August 1236 Frederick had reached the neighbourhood
of Verona. Gebhard of Arnstein had been sent on in advance
with five hundred mercenary knights and one hundred mer
cenary archers to invest the town, and Frederick himself
brought a further thousand knights and some infantry. Con
siderable additional forces were to join him in Italy, in particular
the levies from the loyal towns. The important thing was to
enlarge in every direction the exit of the pass. Eccelino was
to work eastwards towards the Treviso March : against Padua,
Vicenza and Treviso, which were already being supported by
Venice. The Emperor himself turned westward into Lom-
bardy proper. Mantua had declared for the League, so com
munication with Cremona, Frederick's most valuable north
Italian base, was cut. The town levies from Cremona, Parma,
Reggio and Modena could not join Frederick because a hostile
Confederate army was doing its utmost to prevent the junction
of the two forces. By making a northern detour, and invading
the hostile territory of Brescia, the troops from the imperial
towns succeeded in effecting a junction with the Emperor,
which was accounted a great success for his cause. The most
important task was now to open the road from Verona to
Cremona. The two minor fortresses of Mercaria and Mosio
were held by Lombard garrisons. These were taken. An
effort was then made to tempt the Mantuans into the open
by a three-day siege, but when they refused to come out the
CAPTURE OF VICENZA 431
march to Cremona was continued. One goal had now been
reached, and the Verona base secured.
The Emperor spent nearly the whole of October in Cremona,
waiting. Negotiations with Pope and Lombards were in pro
gress, and the Diet was to be held in Cremona which had first
been summoned for Piacenza. Piacenza was no longer eligible,
for a papal " action of peace and mediation " had succeeded in
detaching the town from Frederick and inducing it to join the
League. The town was lost to the Empire for the next ten
years. On the other hand, the town of Bergamo threw over
the League and joined Frederick. Lombard politics were
always kaleidoscopic.
The Diet was destined not to be held at all. At the end
of October the Emperor suddenly quitted Cremona. Eccelino
on the Adige in the Legnano region was holding a hostile army
in check, composed of combined troops from Vicenza, Treviso^
Padua and Mantua. He saw the Verona passes threatened
again, and called Frederick to the eastern scene of war. The
Emperor hastened to his assistance in a forced march that has
become famous, probably intending to take the confederate
troops in the rear by approaching from the north via San Boni
facio and Ajrcole. Accompanied only by his heavy cavalrj
Frederick quitted Cremona on the evening of the 3Oth October
and in a march of one day and two nights covered the whole
distance from Cremona to San Bonifacio, east of Verona, close
on seventy miles, at full speed/* like a swallow cutting the air.'
On the morning of November ist he reached San Bonifacio
halted " as long as it takes a man to eat a piece of bread in haste '
and hastened on at once, not southwards to Eccelino but stil
east to attack Vicenza. The position had suddenly altered
When the confederate army heard of the Emperor's unexpectec
approach it dissolved at once, for the towns themselves seemec
threatened. The Vicenzans led the van, abandoning tents anc
baggage in hasty flight for home, since Vicenza lay more ex
posed to attack than any of the other towns. They came to<
late. A few hours took Frederick the additional eighteen anc
a half miles to Vicenza. He arrived on the afternoon of tha
same first of November, stormed the town which had refusec
to surrender, and gave it over to plunder. Eccelino meantime
432 SUCCESS OF CAMPAIGN vi
came up, the town was handed over to his care and put in
immediate charge of an imperial captain.
The story runs that Frederick II gave his friend Eccelino
a brief demonstration of how he would like the govern
ment of the town to be conducted. The two were walking
up and down in the bishop's garden in Vicenza when the
Emperor drew his poniard and said : "I will show thee
how thou mayest without fail maintain thy rule," and thereupon
he beheaded with his dagger all the longer blades of grass.
Eccelino understood. " I shall not fail to note the Emperor's
instructions," was his reply. Before long he began by a reign
of terror to build up Italy's first seigniory.
The immediate result of the taking of Vicenza was the
surrender of Salinguerra, with his capital of Ferrara and the
surrender of the district of Camino. The other towns of
the East were so shaken that Eccelino and Gebhard of Arnstein
were able, in the course of the winter, to capture Padua, after
which Treviso under the Margrave of Este also surrendered.
The whole of Northern Italy, east of a line running from
Verona to Ferrara, had thus been won for the Emperor.
Eccelino under the Emperor's protection now organised the
whole territory into one kingdom or "Tyranny": which
Venice felt to be a grave menace to her. The brief campaign
of 1236 had not brought a final decision, but had at least
achieved notable successes : above all the exit from the Alps
and the approach to Cremona were secured.
We have already anticipated the chief events in Austria.
The overthrow of the Babenberg had only been temporary,
for Duke Frederick had been able to maintain himself at
certain fortified places. Nevertheless, peace had been for the
moment restored. The Emperor lingered for weeks in Vienna ;
declared the Babenberg deposed, and laid the foundation of
those private Hohenstaufen possessions already mentioned.
He granted a great privilege to Vienna which was henceforth
to be a direct appanage of the Empire. He held a Diet
there at which once more a large number of German princes
were assembled. Nothing bears more eloquent testimony to
Frederick's increased prestige and power than the fact that
without any special concessions the German princes at once
1236 SUCCESSION ASSURED 433
consented to choose the nine-year old Conrad, King of Jerusa
lem, as Frederick's successor; and, more, as "King of the
Romans and future Emperor," thus satisfying the ancient
ambition of the House of Hohenstaufen. The electoral deci
sion of the princes is couched in haughty language. They
fell in with the Hohenstaufen tradition, and felt themselves in
fact the successors and heirs of Roman Senators. " In the
beginning of Rome's history, after the memorable defeat of the
Trojans and the destruction of their noble city, the highest
power and the electoral franchise for the Empire rested with
the senators of the new race of the new town. Yet with the
gradual ever-increasing growth of the Empire and its ever
growing strength, the height of such great fortune could
not remain for ever with one single city — though she were the
royallest among them all. After the Empire's power had pil
grimaged through the most distant regions in a certain circular
wandering it came to rest at last for ever among Germania's
princes — in a manner not less beneficial than inevitable — that
from amongst them, who secure the safety and prosperity of
the Empire, the ruler of the Empire should be chosen."
The royal succession was thus assured in Germany and in
the Roman Empire. The Emperor, however, abstained from
crowning King Conrad IV. His experience with King Henry,
in whose stead Conrad was now chosen, " as David for Saul,"
had demonstrated that too great independence on the part of
the German King was dangerous. King Conrad, or the Re
gents appointed for him, were, therefore, to rule simply as
delegates of the Emperor. The first regent was Archbishop
Sigfrid of Mainz, and, later, Henry Raspe of Thuringia. In
spring Frederick moved from Vienna to Speyer to assemble
other princes there for Whitsuntide and permit them to confirm
the King's election. The Emperor's time was mainly occupied
in extensive preparations for continuing the Lombard war, and
in August he was again encamped on the Lechfeld with fresh
troops. A brief letter informed the Romans of his proceedings.
No matter which concerned the Romans should be concealed
from them (he wrote), since every undertaking of the Emperor's
was specially planned on their behalf. He was now striking his
tents on the fields of Augsburg before again seeking Latium's
434 MUSTERING OF FORCES vi
borders with the assembled fighting forces of Germany under
the fame-crowned banner of the imperial eagles.
When marching at the head of his armies Frederick felt him
self more than ever one of the Caesars. He had opened the
Lombard campaign by seizing one of the Roman eagles in his
hand. This year, even more than last, he hoped the genius
of Rome would accompany him on his campaign.
At the request of the German Grand Master negotiations
with the Pope were again opened this year. Hermann of Salza
had a difficult task. At a big Chapter in Marburg, where over
a hundred of the Teutonic knights were assembled, the brothers
of the Order showed themselves quite as impatient as the
German princes at the thought that their Master was treating,
and for ever treating, instead of striking. The Emperor was
not optimistic about these fresh efforts, though, in fact, Hermann
of Salza accomplished on this occasion more than ever before.
Frederick's successes in the March of Treviso had intimidated
both Lombards and Pope. Gregory even withdrew from Lom-
bardy his legate, Cardinal Jacob of Palestrina, whom the Emperor
cordially disliked, and replaced him by two more congenial
cardinals. The Lombards also were becoming more amenable,
and perhaps a treaty might have been arranged if the Venetians
had not torpedoed the peace negotiations. A Lombardy united
under the Emperor, an Eccelino at their back in the March of
Treviso : they must have felt that this would be a perpetual
menace. After Piacenza deserted the Emperor's cause a
Venetian had been put in as podesta. On instructions from
the Doge he made the Piacenzans swear that they would never
accept an imperial podesta. This was one of the Emperor's
most important conditions, and the negotiations fell through.
In the middle of September 1237 the Emperor arrived in
Verona with two thousand German knights. Gebhard of Arn-
stein joined him soon after. He had hastened on ahead and
called up the Tuscan levies in the greatest haste, and joined
forces with the Sicilian army consisting of seven thousand
Saracen archers and the Apulian knights. A few days later
the levies from the loyal towns came in, led by Cremona, and
the auxiliaries of Eccelino. The chivalry of individual towns
like Bergamo and Tortona mustered also, and other volunteers
FALL OF MANTUA 435
poured in, so that the Emperor ultimately had at his disposal
an army of some twelve to fifteen thousand men. Success
speedily followed. The fortress of Redondesco, west of
Mantua, was conquered in September, followed by two other
castles in the Mantuan region, so that Mantua itself surrendered
on the first of October, Preliminary negotiations with the
podesta, Count Richard of San Bonifacio, had paved the way
for the surrender of this important town.
The Emperor now turned north into Brescian territory.
Montechiaro, strongly fortified and strongly garrisoned, was
taken by stratagem after a siege of fourteen days. The forti
fications were destroyed and the fifteen hundred foot-soldiers
and twenty knights of the Lombard League captured here
were taken to Cremona. The road to Brescia was now open.
But a Lombard army about ten thousand strong lay close
before the walls, and the problem was to attack the enemy
forces as far as possible in the open. The Lombards skilfully
evaded a battle, which was a simple matter as long as they could
use Brescia as their base. The Emperor tried to lure them off.
He marched through the Brescia territory southwards, laying
waste, captured four castles and compelled the Lombards to
follow, for they feared an attack on one of the other defenceless
towns if they lost touch with the imperial army. The story of
Vicenza might well have been repeated. By the middle of
November the two armies finally lay face to face near Ponte-
vico, separated by a marshy little river which there flows into
the Oglio. Operations came to a standstill. The Emperor
could not allow his heavy cavalry to attack across the marshy
land, the Lombards accepted no challenge. November was
almost over. Negotiations had been unsuccessful — in spite
of considerable concessions by the towns. There seemed no
hope of dealing a decisive blow at the Lombards before the
year was out.
Then Frederick II had recourse to stratagem. The Oglio,
a small river that traverses Lombardy from north to south and
flows into the left bank of the Po, lay behind his position, which
probably filled the angle made by the marshy little tributary
436 CORTENUOVA vi
and the Oglio. On the further side of the Oglio lay Cremona,
three or four hours' march away. The Emperor made a feint
of setting off to take up his winter quarters in the town, a move
which the advanced season made entirely plausible. While the
watching Lombards remained, covered by their marshes, the
Emperor crossed the Oglio by several bridges, broke these
behind him, as the enemy could observe, and sent in fact a
THE BATTLE OF CORTENUOVA
large part of his army, including the town infantries and the
baggage, southwards to Cremona, He himself, however, now
separated from the Lombards by the Oglio, marched off north
wards with his striking force : the entire cavalry and his light
Saracen archers. He followed the Oglio upstream. The
Lombards, certainly the Milanese, were bound to cross the
river somewhere, and the Emperor intended to intercept them.
For two days he lay in vain in ambush at Soncino ; at last news
came. The Lombards, feeling perfectly secure, had moved off
further north, crossed the river and were encamped at Pon-
toglio. Frederick immediately struck camp, left Soncino on
the morning of November 27th, and his vanguard of German
knights fell on the amazed Lombards that same afternoon.
The Lombards had only just time to rally round the carroccio,
the standard-bearing chariot of Milan, which had been set up
at Cortenuova. Meanwhile Frederick's main force, marching
up in several columns, one of which the Emperor himself com-
1237 "CARROCCIO" OF MILAN 437
inanded, soon compelled a decision. Darkness set in early
owing to the season, and there was not time to take Cor-
tenuova by daylight. The Lombards abandoned the place
in the night and fled, leaving the Milanese carroccio behind.
The pursuit began at dawn ; the Lombards lost an immense
number of prisoners : 3,000 foot soldiers and over 1,000 knights,
amongst whom was thepodesta of Milan, Pietro Tiepolo, son of
the Doge of Venice. The standard itself, which the Milanese
had sought to save, got lost in the flight and was found by
the victors and made a great trophy in the conquered camp.
Cortenuova, one of the few great battles of the Middle Ages,
was a complete victory for the imperial arms and a glorious
climax to Frederick's empire in Germany. It belongs entirely
to his German period. For the last time an Emperor's Italian
campaign, voted and supported by the German princes took
the form of an imperial war. Coming from the North, Frede
rick, like his forefathers, had once again crossed the Alps
and conquered in the Lombard plain. The victory was won
mainly by the German knights, but was immediately trans
lated by Frederick into Roman phraseology to give the success
its spiritual value : " Germanic victory " would have created
a false impression, " German victory " would have as yet had
no meaning. The victory was therefore turned to the glory
of Roman arms, it was won in the name of imperial Rome and
of her Caesars as Frederick truthfully wrote to the people of
Rome. Even during the battle the manes of the Roman Impera-
tors had accompanied the Hohenstaufen, yea, even victorious
Roma herself, when he gave his warriors their new battle-cry,
their new slogan of victory :
MILES ROMA ! MILES IMPERATOR !
And in order to lose nothing of the glamour and glory of
ancient deeds of arms the Emperor followed up the victory,
which he had won with the battle-cry of Rome, by a triumph
which deliberately and intentionally revived prehistoric and
forgotten ceremonies. People said that he was planning
to elevate Cremona to the position of a second Rome. When
Frederick a few days later entered Cremona with his immense
booty, his numerous prisoners and his victorious army,
438 TRIUMPH vi
he did so after the fashion of the Roman Emperors cele
brating their triumphs : the captured enemy commanders
followed in fetters ; Pietro Tiepolo, son of the Doge of Venice,
sometime podesta of Milan, was bound upon his back to
the lowered mast of the Milanese carroccio. This noblest of
trophies was drawn by an elephant through the streets of
Cremona to the joyous cheering of the people. The Emperor's
yellow banner with the Roman eagles floated aloft, while from
a wooden tower on the elephant's back trumpeters made
known the triumph of the new Divus Caesar Augustus. The
Emperor himself told the Romans that his triumph was a
reversion to the original Roman form.
The intoxication of this exotic, pagan-Roman, assuredly
most unchristian, celebration of victory, marked a turning
point in Frederick's life. All the magnificent Roman titles
which he, like his predecessors bore, were justified. The
empty formula, meaninglessly used, " Imperator Invictus,"
suddenly meant once more what it had meant of old. With
out the need of transcendental interpretation he was now in
the naked literal sense :
FELIX VICTOR AC TRIUMPHATOR.
The shades of Rome, of the Romans and their Caesars, had
tasted blood : they began to stir again and to be visible in the
flesh once more ; a genuine breath of antiquity revivified by
life itself.
VII. CAESAR AND ROME
The magic of Rome Renovatio imperil Identifica
tion with Caesar Spolia opima from Cortenuova
Lust for personal glorification Frederick's wooing of
the Romans Cardinals and Pope Progress in Lom-
bardy Diets of Pavia and Turin, 1238 Siege of
Brescia ; Calamandrinus Coalition against Frederick
Enzio Imperial Court at Padua Frederick's
appeal to the Cardinals Frederick excommunicated
Death of Hermann of Salza Reorganisation and defence
of Sicily Destruction of Benevento (1241) Re
organisation of Italy War of manifestos and propa
ganda Brother Elias Brother Jordan and the Pope
Christmas in Pisa Frederick invades the Papal
States Letter to Jesi At the gates of Rome
Gregory turns the multitude
VII. CAESAR AND ROME
ROME, golden, eternal, mighty, glorious, world-conquering
Rome, the Mistress, the City of Cities, the fortunate, the royal,
the holy city THE CITY, seat of empire and of fame . . . !
No adjective was too august to be used in antiquity and in the
Middle Ages to do honour to the still-radiant glory of the one
capital of the world. Through the centuries the magic worked
on, at first the magic of glory, later the magic of glorious ruin.
The name of Rome and the possession of Rome, much striven
after, was one with the rule over the Roman world. If it was
desired to honour the mighty, Rome was shown offering them
homage on bended knee. Each of the Emperors in turn showed
honour to Rome by making a pilgrimage to the town in which
the crown of the world was given away.
Since the decline of Rome the wish to renew her ancient
glory had never died out. The Roman Empire of the Germans
was itself the idea of the Renovatio, and the inscription of
a Carolingian seal read : Renovatio Imperil.
The Emperors were the first and the most powerful of those
who sought to achieve the renewal of Rome, but two rivals soon
arose — first the Popes, then the Romans. The Caesar-Popes
of the Middle Ages felt themselves to be the successors of the
Roman Divi, just as much as did the Emperors, for the Dona
tion of Constantine had entitled them to the imperial insignia :
pallium and purple, sceptre and standard and tiara ; had
endowed them further with the imperial palace of the Lateran,
and the rule over Rome, Italy, even the whole Empire. The
world-rule of the imperial Papacy was to renew Rome's ancient
greatness and power. It is a straight line from Gregory VII,
the founder of the imperial Papacy, through Innocent III, the
verus imperator and protector of the Byzantine-Latin Empire ;
through Boniface VIII, who called himself Caesar and Im
perator, down to that Prince and General, the last of the
imperial Popes who chose Julius II as his name. The Romans
44i
442 "S. P. Q. R." vn
were slower to re-discover themselves, but a new era began
even for them in the middle of the twelfth century. It was
closely connected with the doctrines of Roman law and the
Lombard conception of freedom. For a long time to come
they dated their documents from the year 1144, in which the
Senate and Equestrian Order were renewed and the Roman
respublica ruled once again through a sacer senatus from the
Capitol, reminding the first Hohenstaufen, Conrad III, that
the Caesars of old ruled the world only in virtue of the Senate
and Roman people. Senatus Populusque Romanus was now
about to rule the world again.
In spite of these two rivals the dream of a Rome renewed
remained alive in the German Empire until the fall of the
Hohenstaufens, now weaker, now stronger, now ebbing, now
surging up as in the days of the third Otto and of Barbarossa.
The changefulness of the Roman idea is a testimony to its life :
each of the Emperors who took it up gave it the impress of
his time. Certain elements in it remained constant : from
the very beginning this idea of rebirth involved rivalry with
Byzantium, the capital of the Eastern Empire. Roman law
had inculcated the subjection of all peoples under one Roman
Caesar. Its resumption under Barbarossa set a goal for the
Roman dream : to establish once again the Roman world of
the days before Constantine in its whole undivided compre
hensiveness. The Crusades enlarged the world indefinitely
towards the East. Finally, Henry VI, as heir of Robert Guiscard,
of whom they wrote " it might have been his to renew the
ancient Empire of the Romans," had planned to give the coup
de grdce to languishing Byzantium. The West-Roman German
Emperor was to be sole monarch of the world. Such was his
will. Such was granted, in fact, not to him but to his son.
No Angelus and no Comnenus challenged the rivalry of
Frederick IL Before his rule began Byzantium had been
conquered by the Crusaders. Titular Emperors, vassals of
the Pope, reigned on a Latin Bosporus. What was left of the
Empire of Nicaea was ruled by an impotent Basileus who had
been given to wife a natural daughter of the Hohenstaufen
CULT OF THE CAESARS 443
Emperor. Frederick II was unquestionably the last emperor
of the ancient Roman Empire, the one and only head of the
Christian world. If he took up the thought of a Renewal of
Rome — and how could he fail to take it up ! — he must give it
a new meaning against internal rivals, for outer rivals there
were none.
The triumph of Jerusalem had exalted the Hohenstaufen to
be the Son of God : the bloodier victory of Cortenuova made
him also a Son of Earth. The former was followed by the
formation of the Sicilian monarchy : the celebration of the
latter by Frederick's Renovatio Imperil. A secondary conse
quence was that Frederick II as triumphator legibus et armis
stepped into the circle of the Caesars, attained the rank of a
World Monarch though not that of a conqueror of distant
worlds. In the signs manifested by Providence Frederick had
read his task : " After the pacification of the surrounding
peoples to bring the centre of Italy into the service of the
Empire." This call to subdue " the province of provinces "
accorded marvellously with the personal and private wish of
the Emperor himself : " From the very beginning of our days,
since the illustrious nature of the Caesars with happy violence
overcame our royal disposition, ere yet a higher fortune had
fallen to our lot, our heart has ever burned with the desire to
reinstate in the position of their ancient dignity the Founder
of the Roman Empire and the Foundress, Rome herself, . . .
and this unquenched desire was fused with the dignity of
Empire which ensued."
Retrospectively we see the boy and king, then the Emperor,
enthroned in Palermo, in Aix, in Worms, in Mainz and in
Jerusalem, straining from childhood towards the one great
goal : by his own deeds to beget anew the ancient greatness of
the Caesars and of Rome. Impelled by this passionate desire
Frederick II journeyed through his realms with pride : " David
in Syria ; Guiscard in Sicily ; Charles in Germany," as Henry
of Avranches phrased it. From each of these countries the
Hohenstaufen took something, but each of these roles he
exalted by the inspiration and impulse of a Caesar, and each
he brought to ripeness and fulfilment. Others had prepared
the ground, others had sown and watered ; the fulness of
444 ROMA CAPUT MUNDI vii
time had come, and Frederick was chosen to reap the harvest
of centuries. The form of one great Ruler was to be conjured
up anew less by magic than by force : the flattering poet had
sung " and Caesar art thou in Rome ! " It seemed that the
victory of Cortenuova might perhaps make this promise
good : here was the key to Italy, the land of the Caesars, not
the provinces alone . Sicilia — Germania — Syria — Frederick
wrote to the Romans that he hoped to see again the borders
of Latium and to be Caesar in the home of the Caesars : that
would be for himself and for the world the ultimate fulfil
ment.
ROMA CAPCJT MUNDI ! This age-old phrase graced like a
challenge a seal of Frederick II's. If this rune was as tangibly
and literally fulfilled as the ancient claim of the Emperors
to be the successors of David ; if Frederick II was Maximus
Imperator of Italy and with the Pontifex, a Caesar again in
Rome ; if Rome was, in no spiritual, transcendental sense, but
in sober actual fact, the capital of Italy and of the Roman
Empire, then the Empire of the Caesars, so oft invoked in
manifesto, had become tangible once more and the Empire had
been perfected as befitted the time. It was the opinion of the
time that as a matter of course :
Roma caput mundi frenas regit orbis rotundi.
An Emperor celebrating a triumph in Rome itself would, in
some mystic way, become possessed of all the kingdoms of the
West. Rome was the key to the ultimate Empire of Peace :
He who should renew the Augustan Age on earth must reign
in Rome and judge the peoples of the earth according to Roman
Law. People expected the world's salvation to flow from
Roman Law, from one Justice in all countries : legibus antiquis
totus reparabitur orbis. Such had long been the hope — the
Arch-Poet had sung the same for his master Barbarossa. More
recently another poet had promised Kaiser Frederick that a
collection of imperial laws would make him orbis terrarum
salutifer. The idea of renewal was doubtless at all times
quickened by such speculations about salvation ; but now they
are all finally engulfed in the belief in the imminence of the
Last Day, which so completely dominated the time. Everything
CONDENSATION 445
was straining back to the same origins, the origins of Church
and Empire: the expected Prince of Peace, the Justtiw-Imperator
and the Renewer of Caesar Augustus were ultimately, not
radically different.
" His heart beat with no other purpose than to be Lord and
Master of the Whole World . . .", Brunetto Latini declared
later, and other contemporaries exchanged similar whispers.
The world-dominion of which Frederick II dreamed, however,
contained no threat to neighbouring rulers. " At the height of
imperial fortune , content with our own lot, fulfilled with supreme
happiness, we envy none. . . ." The Roman world-dominion
of this Hohenstaufen was not to be won on the battlefields
of Gaul or Spain, of Egypt or of Poland, but in Rome.
Frederick II concentrated all his plans on Rome. The modern
mind expects organic growth to proceed centrifugally, its ever-
widening circles stretching further and further into actual space.
In contrast this last Emperor in his ascent to the dominion of
the world drew his centripetal circles ever narrower and closer.
His task was to penetrate to the innermost recesses of the
Empire, as his office entitled him to do, and condense all the
widely-diffused spiritual influences of the Empire at its very
heart. In proportion as his power increased he must, therefore,
avoid the danger of dissipating his strength afar, and must con
centrate it all at the central point. The ultimate result was an
intolerable strain which, lacking an outward safety valve, grew
in the centre more and more intense. Frederick II provides
the only historical example of a World Ruler aiming not at
expansion but at condensation.
The distant spaces of empire were closed to Frederick II by
Cortenuova. Often as he sought to escape again from Italy
he never left the peninsula. Italy consumed him. Cortenuova
was also the beginning of his Caesarship, of his metamorphosis
from the Law-Giver of great dominions into the Leader of tiny
armies, a reflection of his personal pilgrimage from the spiritual
spaces of a world-empire back to the core of Italy, " the pro
vince of provinces/' the City of Cities. During the very battle
itself and in the triumph after victory Frederick was mindful
of the customs of ancient Rome and of the Caesars. His titles
now ring truer, more sonorous : Victor, Felix, Triumphator.
446 CONNOTATIONS OF CAESAR vn
They are no longer mere symbols of an idea ; they are the
sober statement of its realisation. The imperial Chancery now
multiplied the Caesarean titles. It was a venerable custom
to speak of the Empire of the Caesars. Now unceasingly the
swords of Caesar are victorious ; glorious and all-conquering
are Caesar's standards, and the Roman Eagles, and Caesar's
army. This flood of resonant adjectives exceeds all custom,
as does also the " unquenchable will " by very deed to re
awaken to new life the Roman Caesars. It is idle to ask whether
Cortenuova was a victory comparable to those of ancient days.
People wanted to see Caesar. And the living history — deed
and gesture and spectacle — was interpreted in the ancient
Roman mood and brought more of the genuine Caesarean
atmosphere into the time than scores of learned treatises
could have done.
It was remarkable the connotations that " Caesar " brought :
fame, glory, triumph, of course ; but also, rooted perhaps in
Roman law : vengeance as function of the Caesars ; their hate,
their savagery, their lion's wrath, their force and passion, their
unbending will. Delia Vigna in his victory manifesto pro
claims that " streams of blood dyed the swords of Caesar," and
tells how " Caesar charged boldly at the head of his armies,". . .
Again, the Emperor will show the world " how Augustus pro
ceeds against the foe and Caesar works his vengeance with the
steel." "Augustus, the Avenger/' a brilliant figure, wrathful,
terror-inspiring, which Frederick showed the foe and which
remained vivid and little-changed throughout the Renaissance.
Earlier Emperors had been freely enough compared to the
Caesars, it is true. Frederick II, however, now began in quite
a new strain to measure himself against their individual quali- >
ties. " You may turn over and search through the history of
the Caesars, starred with deeds of incomparable greatness,
described in ancient chronicles and annals, you may scan the
acts of individual Emperors, but the most diligent seeker will
not find a gentle generosity comparable to ours wherewith
God hath inspired us," thus Frederick wrote to all the world
when he released a deeply-hated Cardinal from imperial im-
CAESAR RE-INCARNATE 447
prisonment : convinced like many another despot of his
own overflowing benevolence. In the celebrated mourning
letter on the death of the discrowned King Henry, David and
Caesar, the Biblical and the Roman prototypes, must justify
the mourning father's tears : " Neither the first are we, nor
shall we be the last to suffer injury from sons who have done
ill, and none the less to weep upon their grave. David
mourned three days for Absalom, his first-born ; and that
illustrious Julius, the first Caesar, stinted neither duty nor
the tears of fatherly affection over the ashes of his son-in-law
Pompey, who had sought to compass the ruin and to take
the life of his wife's father." This is a new way to envisage
the past : the great figures live again when the man in action
is called up behind the high-resounding name.
The picture for which Frederick II posed and which the
imperial Chancery painted was quickly apprehended near
and far. The times were ripe, and ready to see the Emperor
under the symbols of the Roman Caesars, though, in fact, the
statuesque and empty Roman of their dreams was as far removed
from Frederick's living Caesar-incarnation as classicism from
Napoleon. But the shades had tasted blood again. The
Emperor took rank in the Caesars* heroic company. Poets,
chroniclers and writers began to compare Frederick with Caesar
and with Augustus and to seek resemblances in individual
episodes. A poet expressly recalls the victor in civil war, and
apostrophises Frederick thus : " Greater than Julius, thou,
when the rebellious people challenge thee to battle." They
quote Lucan to compare Frederick's treatment of his soldiers
with Caesar's. An historian in Florence not long after writes :
" From the first Imperator, Julius Caesar, called in the be
ginning Gaius Julius, to the mighty Lord, the all- wise Frederick
II, whom Merlin and the Sibyls had foretold. . . ." All the
adjectives and all the superlatives which all the carefully re
capitulated ancient Emperors had borne were heaped upon
the Staufen.
The Emperor's relation to Piero della Vigna is compared
with that of Augustus to Vergil, of Theodoric to Cassiodorus,
and on a verse of Vergil is based the eulogy which runs :
" Jointly with Julius, Caesar guides the Empire." The poet,
448 "SPOLIA OPIMA" vn
Orfinus of Lodi, taking the name of Caesar for his title, rattles
out in threadbare phrase endless strophes of the type :
Nullus in mundo Caesare grandior. . .
Nullus sub sole Caesare fortior . . .
If it was possible for Frederick II to pose as Caesar amidst
the fragments of the ancient world and in the new intellectual
world that was awakening, it was much more possible in rela
tion to Rome herself and to the Romans who, like the Emperor,
were jealous for the revival of their ancient greatness.
Frederick II wrote once that the Goddess Fortuna hailed
Caesar more joyously in the neighbourhood of Rome than in
any other place. The victory of the imperial, the Roman,
arms at Cortenuova brought Rome within nearer reach, and
Rome promised the Triumphator a triumph of a quality
Cremona could not give. Frederick II could strike a fuller
note in celebrating Caesarism to the Romans, the music of his
fame and theirs could ring more clear and true. The moment
had not yet quite come to bring Caesar back to Rome.
Frederick, however, could anticipate a little, could convey a
harbinger of future glory, could transfer some reflection of his
triumph to Rome, the home of imperial triumphs. To give
richness and reality to the gesture of his ancient Roman triumph
he sent, soon after the victory, to the Senate and People of
Rome, the Milanese carroccio, the standard-bearing chariot,
with banners, and standards and trumpets, as the spolia opima
which victorious Caesar, after the manner of the ancient
Emperors, laid at the feet of Rome. A solemn and magni
loquent letter accompanied the trophies : " Nature and all-
powerful Reason whose commands kings must obey, make it
our duty in the days of our victory to exalt the fame of the
city which our forefathers enhanced by the glory of triumphs,
and humbly, in not unworthy phrase, we acknowledge our duty
in this matter. Look ye, if the triumph be traced back to the
inevitable nature of its origin, we could not exalt our imperial
glory without exalting first the honour of the city whom we of
old recognised as the fountain head of our power. Our wishes
would verily be far removed from Reason if we, illumined by
the radiance of the Caesars, were to tolerate the Romans' being
STANDARD OF MILAN 449
left without a share in the rejoicings over a Roman victory. . . .
If we were to rob you of the fruits of a venture which was
conducted in your name, when we conquered the rebels of the
Roman Empire to the battle-cry of the Roman name ... if we
failed to bring home to the Royal City the fame and glory of
our exploits, that city which sent us forth to Germany to scale
the heights of Empire, as a mother sends her son. We ascribe
to your renown whatever, under favourable auspices, we have
subsequently achieved, we turn again in the fame of our most
glorious success to the city which as a boy we quitted with the
anxiety born of an unknown future.
" Thus we recall the Caesars of old to whom the Senate
and people of Rome awarded triumph and laurel for deeds of
arms performed under victorious standards, preparing from
of old the paths according to your wishes by the present
illustrious example which we give : for we send herewith after
the victory over Milan, assuredly the Head of the Confederation
of Italy, we send to you the standard-bearing chariot of that
commune, as booty of the vanquished enemy and prize of
victory, and for you a pledge of our valorous deeds and of our
glory, in the intention of safely accomplishing all that remains,
when oncewe see peace restored in Italy, the seat of our Roman
Empire.
" Receive therefore with gratitude, O Quirites, the victory
of your Imperator ! The fairest hopes may smile on you, for
dearly as we love to follow the old ceremonies, yet more eagerly
do we aim at renewing the ancient nobility of the City. . . ."
Frederick II intended by triumphal ceremonies and by his
example to re-awaken in modern Rome the ancient Roman
spirit, as we also learn from the verses " of Caesar Augustus
the Just " which accompanied the triumphal gift :
" And mayest thou thus, O City, be mindful of earlier triumphs
Destined aforetime for thee by the kings, the leaders in battle."
The City of Cities, battening still on its ancient renown, re
sponded to the mood of the new Caesar. The Romans led in
solemn procession the captured chariot, which to the shame of
Milan had been dragged for a spectacle through the awe-struck
450 VICTORY MANIFESTO vn
towns of Italy, drawn by a team of mules instead of its own
white oxen. According to the Senate's instructions the booty
was escorted to the Capitol amidst the rejoicings of the people.
There the chariot was mounted on five marble pillars. Then
a relief was carved in white marble depicting this token of
victory, with an inscription which sang in many distichs the
fame of the Emperor and his love of Rome which had prompted
him to send his trophies to the City.
This whole episode marks a new feature of the time, not only
of Frederick himself: the ancient Roman triumph already
heralds the Renaissance, and no less the lust for trionfi, for
laurels, for personal fame, for the immortalising of the hero.
Frederick II had already celebrated a triumph in Jerusalem,
the fountain head of his Christian kingdom, but that Eastern
triumph had been offered to God (not to the Church, who was
angry). It had been a mystical Gloria in Christo> " accom
plished more by miracle than valour." The new triumph of
arms glorified only the Roman Imperator, Caesar, the man,
as Victor.
In vain did Piero della Vigna, in the proclamation intended
for the Pope and for the Christian monarchs, seek to lift the
victory into the realm of the miraculous : the triumph on the
Capitol — which Christians believed to be the seat of heathen
demons — the celebration of the victory itself, which lacked all
Christian consecration, subserved no longer the eternal glory
of God but the everlasting fame of a mortal, who, it is true,
bore himself almost as a demi-god. But the glory of man
grows pale ; henceforth the thirst for fame grew stronger in
Frederick and ever stronger. " That the might of Augustus
may not lack occasion for fresh triumph ! " he writes once
during these fighting years. For his subjects the fighting was
to bring the end of their burdens, " for ourselves the highest
victory . . ." ; for his subjects victory was to bring desired
repose, " for ourselves the wreath of the battle." For the " fame
and praise" of his name Frederick at this time contem
plated restoring the tunnel of the Emperor Claudius by which
he had drained the Fucine Lake. " For eternal and ever-
ALLIANCE WITH ROMANS 451
lasting memory " he had a statue of himself carved in stone, a
figure in the round standing free, to ornament the gate of the
bridge at Capua ; reliefs all round celebrated the Emperor's
victories and gave the whole the character of a Porta Trium-
phalis. To attach so much importance to the perishable body,
so shamelessly to do it homage, was unheard of in the Middle
Ages.
This Caesar-like gesture was no doubt the Emperor's per
sonal caprice and carried its own meaning, but a statesman's
most private act is not without its political purpose. Bar-
barossa, the first German Emperor after an interval of many
years to intervene effectively in Italian affairs, found himself
obliged sonorously to reassert his dignity as Caesar with the
Roman law behind him, for the German feudal kingship with
its armies which had sufficed the Ottos and the Salians no longer
bore his weight in Italy. What had been true of Italy was truer
still of Rome. A Cardinal writing in late Hohenstaufen times
maintained that he who seeks to rule the Romans must show
them : et gestus magnificos et verba tonantia et facta terribilia.
The Romans had felt this craving for a century or more, since
they re-awakened to self-consciousness : this lust for great
hearted gestures and words of thunder and awe-inspiring deeds
was heightened by Frederick* The Romans were for him the
people of his imperial capital at whose feet he hoped to lay
once more the empire of the world. Besides : he needed the
Romans in his duel with the Pope.
The year 1236 brought the whole Italian-Roman question
to a head. And in that year begins Frederick's wooing of the
Romans with rhythmical high-sounding phrase. He had long
since secured a strong party for himself in Rome, so that he
was certain of finding some response. Probably during his first
quarrel with the Pope about the Crusade, when Roffredo of
Benevento had to read his explanatory manifesto from the
Capitol, his first political alliances with the Romans had been
established. Frederick had gathered about him the most
powerful patrician families of Rome, headed by the Frangipani,
and had made them his vassals by buying up their immovables
452 ROMANS AS VASSALS vn
in Roman territory and granting them back again as fiefs :
landed estates, farms, vineyards, but, above all, towers and solid
buildings in the town, most of which dated from old Roman
times. The Mausoleum of Augustus belonged to the Colonna,
the Colosseum to the Frangipani ; the Arches of Titus and of
Constantine, the Septizonium of Septimius Severus were all
structures which had been fortified at an early date and served
the town aristocracy as castles. The Emperor had acquired
possession of all this, and the Romans were well pleased with
the transaction : they remained in enjoyment of their property
and received no small sum in ready money, and their freehold
became a fief. For a long time to come Roman nobles were
selling their possessions to the Emperor and becoming his
vassals.
In addition to this Frederick had granted fiefs in his Sicilian
kingdom to many of the Roman patricians, a Frangipane
received one in the Principata, John of Polo was granted the
County of Fondi, and later Alba. It is probable that Frederick
also took a wife for his son from the family of these adherents
of his. The consort of Frederick of Antioch was said to have
belonged to the Polo family. Yet other Romans drew regular
annuities from the Emperor and enjoyed — rare privilege — un-
taxed commerce with Sicily.
The Emperor's party in the town of Rome, therefore, was by
no means inconsiderable. It had been disconcerting for him
to have to take the field on the Pope's behalf* against the
Romans : a double game by which at the moment he pur
chased quiet in Germany. The citizens' hate for their spiritual
head, however, drove them back into Frederick's arms, and
within a year of his campaign against the Romans the imperial
party was uppermost in Rome once more. Whether spon
taneously in order to please Frederick, or whether at Frederick's
direct instigation, the nobles now stirred up the populace
against the Pope just at the moment when the Lombard ques
tion was acute between them. In 1236 it again happened that
a pro-Kaiser senator was elected, and Frederick now addressed
his letters to this imperially-minded Rome. Pope Gregory's
complaints, therefore, that the Emperor was recklessly ex
pending money in order to foment strife were not without
LOVE OF ROMANS 453
plausibility. Frederick's reply was that, on the contrary, peace
had reigned in Rome since, and not before, the appointment
of an imperial senator.
It is a striking fact that Frederick II supported and turned
to his own advantage in Rome the very same revolutionary
anti-government impulses which in Lombardy he fought with
fire and sword. But in Rome the movement was hostile to
the Pope. The Lombards' ambitions, moreover, were wholly
individual and selfish, whereas the Romans were aspiring to
their ancient and traditional world-dominion. Earlier Em
perors had resented the suggestion that they exercised imperial
rights in virtue of the Senatus Populusque Romanus, and had
felt an enmity towards the Roman people. Conrad III had
simply left unanswered the Romans' invitation to make Rome,
the caput mundi, his capital, and to restore the Roman Empire
to the position it had held in the days of Constantine and
Justinian, who had ruled the world from Rome. When Bar-
barossa was coming for his coronation the Romans made him
a similar proposal and asked for certain assurances. With the
magnificent arrogance of a Caesar, not lacking a touch of naivete^
Barbarossa thundered at the ambassadors of Rome : the
Senate and the Ordo Equester were naught to him : *' Do you
crave to see the glory of your Rome ? the dignity of your
Senators ? the valour and discipline of your Knights ? Behold
our empire ! We have your Consuls, we have your Senate, we
have your armies. I am the legitimate successor 1 Let who
will snatch the key from the hand of Hercules ! The prince
issues orders to the people, not the people to the prince ! "
Nothing could more clearly illustrate the resemblance and
the difference between Frederick and his grandfather. They
had in common boundless pride and arrogance, but their atti
tude to Rome was radically different : one was the imperial
warrior-knight, the other the imperial statesman-diplomat.
Frederick II did not for a moment question that the imperial
dignity was divinely his, having been bestowed on him by the
Senate and Roman people. He loved, on the contrary, to
recall that it was the Romans themselves who had chosen him,
who had collauded the boy of seventeen, who " in all the
anxieties of ambiguous fate was setting out to Germany to scale
454 CAESAR TITLES VH
the heights of imperial fame," He did not weary of repeating
that the Romans of their own motion had entrusted to him all
the offices and dignities of the Princeps according to the lex
regia. The deduction which he drew was that the Romans
who had spontaneously invested him with the imperial dignity
were henceforth in duty bound adequately to support their
King and Caesar, their Knight and Imperator, the pater imperil,
the Princeps whom they themselves had chosen. 'He by
no means deduced a right of the Romans to act against him.
The reward that he held out to them was a share in their
Emperor's fame and triumph, a sample of which they had
received in the spoils of victory sent by their Triumphator.
" The same Felix Roma who had bestowed all office and owner
ship on the Roman Princeps must stand by him, sharing
burdens and toil, nor fail to share the honours she herself had
helped to heap on him."
Frederick II thus made the Romans sharers in his respon
sibility for the greatness and permanence of his Empire, and
he1 had yet another thought in mind. He promised fulfilment
of their ancient dreams : their wishes for the revival of the
ancient Roman power. His Caesar titles meant a great deal
to him, so did the revival of ancient forms and ceremonies, yet
" gladly though we follow the rites of old we seek yet more
eagerly to revive the ancient nobility of the City." These
words cannot be interpreted too literally or too exactly.
The old idea of Renovatio connoted for Frederick less the
revival of titles and ceremonies than the regeneration of the
Romans themselves, the Roman citizen and the Roman
patrician who should again be worthy to rule an Empire.
Romans had to be made anew. Frederick II could not, single-
handed, effect a re-birth of Rome and of the Empire ; could
not alone call to life a Roman State in the ancient sense. He
required the co-operation of a Roman aristocracy who had at
least as great an affinity with the Fabii, Cornelii and the Tullii
as he himself with Augustus and with Caesar. In this also he
gave the Romans a lead : " We recall the ancient Caesars to
men's minds by the ensample of our own Person 1 " This was
BLOOD OF ROMULUS 455
but the first preliminary of what he sought: "That in our
auspicious days the honour of the blood of Romulus may
revive, the imperial Roman speech be again heard in its glory,
the ancient Roman dignity renewed and an inseparable bond
by our grace be tied between the Roman Empire and the
Roman people themselves." To quicken the old instincts of
rule and statesmanship by a share in the responsibility for the
fate of the Empire, the Emperor now gave orders that Roman
nobles and distinguished Roman citizens should be sent to
him in order that offices of various kinds might be allotted to
them. Some were to receive state offices at Court in his own
immediate entourage. He would make others responsible for
the conduct and administration of districts, and provinces, yet
others would find a place in varied offices suited to the rank and
qualifications of the individual. He summons to his service by
name Proconsuls from the aristocratic families that were loyal to
him, the Orsini, the Poli, the Frangipani and the Malabranca.
It was now clear what Frederick had had in mind when he
invaded Lombardy. The new pan- Italian State which he was
planning was going to be ruled by Romans of the blood of
Romulus, the Provinces were to be governed by Roman pro
consuls, as of yore the mighty Imperium Romanum had been
held in leash by a small number of Roman officials. " We
shall no longer delay the execution of the plan we have evolved :
that to the honour and glory of Rome distinguished Romans
shall preside over the business of the State and shall be re
splendent in dignity/' The Roman Empire, Italy, " the seat
of Empire," should be for the Romans, for the blood of
Romulus ! That was Frederick's idea of Renovatto. Once
Milan had been eliminated, " the head of all dissensions in
Italy," the central point and the fountain of strength in the
Italian Roman state should be Rome herself. The contem
porary Dominican, Bartholomew, interprets Frederick's in
tentions thus : Frederick wished quietly to leave in Rome the
symbols of his mercy and his might, that the strength, the
" virtue " might flow from the head of the world into the limbs.
This implied a complete displacement of the centre of gravity
of the Empire which under the olden German-Roman Em
perors had been in Germany. It was more vital for Frederick
456 BIRTH OF A SON vn
to call the ancient Roman Caesar-Empire to new life from its
very origins. True Roman blood should course again through
the veins of the Roman Empire.
Frederick had chosen the Romans for great tasks : but they
must not slumber lest they miss the flow of the tide : " Awake !
awake ! Sleep not ! " was the burden of those exhortations
full of zeal and power, the aim of all this recalling of the famous
deeds of ancient days. Fame, hard to earn, easy to keep, was
almost lost to these Romans, so far estranged from their noble
origin. The Emperor approaches them with a human touch
otherwise reserved for his Apulians : now he calls them
Fellow-Romans, Conromani, and recalls their origin from the
ashes and ruins of Troy, now he harks back to the great names
of old time and calls up the hosts of the Quiri^s, the tribes of
Romulus, the Patres Conscripti, and the tens of thousands of
the Populus Romanus : now he exhorts them to have in remem
brance the triumph and the glory of their ancestors, the laurels
of the conquerors, the ancient fasti of the Empire, the rods of
the lictors.
Rome is more to him than the origin of his imperial title ;
the Rome of the Caesars, like the Church herself, is his spiritual
mother ; he himself the son of Rome. A son was born to
Frederick in these weeks following the victory of Cortenuova.
All the world was informed of this auspicious event ; the young
king was celebrated " already conceived under a lucky star,
whose birth has been heralded by such triumphs, which are
pledges of the strength of the longed-for peace and justice that
shall prevail in the Empire renewed under the ancient fasces,
symbols of law and order."
The age-old revival dream of the German Emperors thus
flamed up once more in Frederick, and as he sought to re-
quicken not merely Roman forms (like his predecessors) but
Roman life, the ancient state-life of the Romans, his renovatio
ended by heralding the Renaissance. From the revival of the
ancient State, Italy was led to the re-birth of the ancient man.
Rome was to be the capital of a united Italy, and Italy herself
the centre of the Roman Empire, Frederick, it is true, realised
his dream only in part, but the vision never faded — Dante took
it up and gave it a soul.
CARDINALS AND POPE 457
The poet also conceived Italia Una as the centre of the
Roman Empire, as the province of provinces, not only as the
realm of the Caesars but as a national Italy. Frederick had
sought to re-awaken the dead Roman, but Dante to call into
life the Italian people, whom Frederick for a decade had been
forcibly welding into one in his imperial State. This was the
cause of Frederick's great breach with the Curia, who also
desired the rule over a united Italy and continued on into the
period of the Borgia and Medici Popes to cherish the dream.
Frederick II was not content with securing for himself the
Rome of the Caesars : he sought to win also papal Rome,
and he thus kept Pope Gregory in perpetual unrest. Since the
victory of Cortenuova the Pope's position seemed in any case
well-nigh hopeless. He had but recently returned to Rome,
and Frederick's undisguised intention of capturing Rome, his
episcopal seat, followed by the intrigues amongst the Roman
nobility, had hit him hard. Moreover, the concluding words
of the triumphal proclamation which Frederick had addressed
to the Romans contained a threat to the Curia that could not
be misunderstood. The Romans should beware, he wrote, of
those who saw with envy the imperial victory and pondered
the destruction of the spoils ; they should carefully guard the
Emperor's gift, and if necessary put their lex plebiscita in force
which prescribed in such cases the penalty of death 1 Finally,
in an emotional manifesto — a copy of which was sent to the
Pope — Frederick interpreted his victory over Gregory's pro-
t^g^s the Lombards as a triumph of the Lord over Satan !
Nor was this all. Frederick II was a dangerous enemy, skilful
to seek out the weak points in the armour of his foe. He formed
a rallying-point for all enemies of the Papacy, and was able
to find support amongst those most closely associated with
Gregory ; in the very college of Roman cardinals.
The relation existing between the cardinals and the Pope has
very justly been compared to that borne by the German princes
to the Emperor : as the Emperor was elected by the princes so
the Pope was elected by the cardinals, and the Bishop of Rome
458 A DIVIDED COLLEGE vn
was, in certain matters, as much tied by the consilium and
consensus of the cardinals as the Emperor in certain circum
stances by the advice and concurrence of the princes. Simi
larly, in the Roman Curia it depended wholly on the personality
of the Pope for the time being, whether he would rule more
autocratically or more constitutionally, and the cardinals opposed
excessive claims of the Caesar-Popes as strenuously as the
princes those of the Emperor.
Pope Gregory IX, kinsman and disciple of the great Innocent,
was an autocrat in every fibre. To assure himself of a com
plaisant College of Cardinals he had nominated six new
cardinals immediately after his elevation, men whom he knew
to be wholly devoted to himself and prepared to support his
policy as a whole. Individual cardinals, however, concerned
for the welfare of the world and recognising a peaceful co
operation of the two powers as necessary, early began to depre
cate Gregory's excessive hostility to Frederick. The Emperor
was always kept well-informed about the course of affairs at the
papal court. A favourite device of the Pope's was to encourage
the German princes against the Emperor ; imitating this, Fred
erick skilfully drove a wedge into the almost invisible rift. He
expressed on occasion a doubt whether the Pope had acted
with the concurrence of the cardinals, and sought to play them
off against their master with gradually-increasing success.
As his relations with Pope Gregory grew worse over the Lom
bard war Frederick began more and more to make use of the
cardinals, even to negotiate with them directly, over the Pope's
head. In a quarrel about the allegiance of a certain Italian town
he accused the Pope of having refused to restore this place to
the Empire, against the advice of almost all the cardinals. He
complained direct to the cardinals against the activity of the
papal legate in Lombardy, and the King of England wrote to
individual cardinals urging the imperial claims. The Em
peror's success in arms was the ultimate cause of the final
breach. Circumstances gave the verdict too plainly against
Pope Gregory, and the majority of the cardinals saw with
anxiety and concern the danger into which their master's
intransigeance threatened to plunge the Church. The peace
party, who sought an accommodation with Frederick if at all
AN INDOMITABLE GREYBEARD 459
possible, gained in numbers quite apart from Frederick's
wooing. John Colonna, for instance, complained to a cardinal
who was residing in England that the Church had committed
herself " all too violently, all too unreflectingly," to the waves
. . . that no heed was paid to the dissatisfaction of the cardinals
and others . . . that the advocates of peace were rebuffed, the
College of Cardinals divided, and that he, the writer, had been
shamelessly betrayed and left unsupported whenever he had
tried to restore order. . . ,
The mood prevailing in the Roman Curia was dangerous for
the Pope. The condemnation of his policy by the " pillars of
the Church " soon received a public confirmation which could
not easily have been more annihilating. When Frederick II
sent to the Roman people the Milan carroccio, the spoil of a
victory which spelt the Pope's defeat, many cardinals of the
Roman Church joined the Senate and people of Rome in
escorting the standard-bearing chariot in festive procession to
the Capitol, Gregory having strained every nerve to prevent its
entry. They attended the solemn installation of the imperial
trophy, and thus gave in some measure the Church's benedic
tion to the ancient Roman celebration of victory. The Pope,
deserted by the discontented cardinals and by the Romans,
who were intoxicated by the gift from their Triumphator, was
suddenly alone in Rome, " grieved unto death." This Rome
the Emperor was about to make the capital of the Empire and
of Italy, " as soon as we have first reduced to peace the seat of
our Empire, Italy." This reduction of Italy to peace — or to
subjection — could not, after the Emperor's recent successes,
be far off ; to hinder it, the beginning and the end of papal
policy, was scarce now possible. Yet the old man, reaching in
these last years an almost eerie grandeur, indomitably daring,
fate-defying, did not despair. Opportunity might come : the
Emperor might trip. He waited, ready for a counter-thrust
with sword and ban, to break though the fatal encirclement.
The Emperor's victory over the Lombard armies had, in fact,
dissolved the League. Ten days after his triumph in Cremona
Frederick was able to enter Lodi ; a little later, in January
460 NO TERMS FOR MILAN vn
1 23 8, he received the submission of Vigevano at a Diet in Pavia ;
soon after that the submission also of Novara and Vercelli.
In February he entered Piedmont. In Turin he held a second
Diet at which the nobles of these regions did him homage,
Savoy, Montferrat and others. Hereupon Savona, Albenga
and other towns of the Riviera were occupied, so that western
Lombardy, the upper reaches of the Po, were obedient to the
Emperor. The influence of the victory immediately spread
southwards. The legate Gebhard effected an agreement with
Florence : the Florentines dismissed their Milanese podesta
and took instead a Roman, Angelo Malabranca, one of those
proconsuls whom Frederick had designated for imperial office.
Imperial Tuscany was now in Frederick's hand. " As when
new waters stream into a dried-up river-bed and all the fish
begin to live again, the Emperor's supporters sprang every
where to life . . ."so spoke a chronicler on a similar occasion.
The success of Frederick's arms had been potent throughout
Italy for intimidation or good cheer.
The war was not yet over. No peace had yet been made
with Milan. The Emperor's behaviour since the victory had
stiffened instead of breaking the resisting power of this com
mune. Frederick imagined that a Triumphator should not
stoop to treat with rebels : they must offer unconditional sub
mission. To preserve this attitude, which was bound up with
his abysmal hate of Milan he flung to the winds all political
expediency. The Emperor had indeed defeated the Milanese
army, and there had been severe disturbances in the city itself
after the battle : the heretic rabble had stormed the churches,
defiled the altars, hung the crucifixes upside down . . . but the
kernel of Milan's strength, her impregnable city, was unim
paired. For the sake of peace at last Milan would have offered
conditional surrender : Lodi had submitted on demand to
accepting an imperial captain, to delivering hostages, and had
been prepared to undertake yet other obligations. Frederick,
however, appears to have rejected all suggestions from Milan,
and obstinately demanded complete and unconditional sur-,
render. The conquered must put themselves and their town
unquestionably at his mercy. He sent the Milanese the equi
vocal oracle : he would do only what he must.
SIX DEFIANT TOWNS 461
What punishment the imperial judge destined for Milan was
not to be guessed at. Other towns that had surrendered at
discretion Frederick had spared, displaying his imperial in
dulgence, but it was at least questionable whether the specially-
hated Milan could count on clemency. The Milanese would
not take the risk. Mindful how Barbarossa had destroyed
their town, and reflecting accurately that an unconditional peace
could be concluded any day, Milan rejected the Emperor's
demand. They instructed their messengers to say that " their
wits sharpened by experience, they feared the Emperor's
savagery." Faith in their own strength and in their trusty
walls enabled this single town successfully to bid defiance to
the victorious Emperor. Five other towns, scattered fragments
of the Lombard Confederation, followed the heroic example
of Milan : Alessandria, Brescia, Piacenza in Lombardy, and
Bologna and Faenza in the Romagna.
The war went on, and the Emperor was now faced with the
necessity of overcoming these six towns or taking them by
storm, a difficult feat, though not impossible, if Frederick had
only had to do with the townsfolk. No sane political reason
explains what urged the Emperor to such severity towards
Milan that he would not content himself with a, humiliation of
the town, especially as he knew that by far his most dangerous
enemy was in Rome. If Milan was his, on any terms what
soever, the whole of Italy was his, and the Pope remained in
very deed merely Bishop of Rome. But hate for rebels in
general and for Milan in particular animated him, and the
inexorable sternness of a judge who had come to exercise
justice, and the arrogance of a victor in the first flush of triumph
who saw himself a tool in the hands of Providence, These
things may all have contributed to the Emperor's attitude.
He had, moreover, good reason to hope that another successful
campaign would break the resistance of the six remaining
cities. If the imperial arms were again victorious the Pope need
no longer be feared, he was dangerous only in conjunction with
the Lombards*
Frederick at once set about unprecedented preparations for
the new campaign. The whole world was laid under contri
bution to chastise the few rebellious towns. Frederick II even
462 "ABHORRED FREEDOM" vn
begged friendly foreign monarchs for assistance, on the re
markable plea that the Lombards were attacking and endanger
ing not so much Frederick himself as the whole principle of
monarchy. It was usual enough for an intractable noble to
revolt against his overlord, but the Emperor was right in
detecting a far graver menace in a rebellion of his subjects the
town-dwellers, seeking independence. " This matter touches
you and all the kings of earth," he wrote to the King of France.
" Keep open, therefore, your sharp eyes and ears and studi
ously take heed what encouragement to revolt would be given
to all them that would fain throw off the yoke of authority, if
the Roman Empire were to suffer loss through this kind of
insurgence." The Lombards were for Frederick no common
place insurgents. He scented in their recalcitrance a principle
hostile to monarchy and majesty, pregnant with heresy which
it should be " the desire and the honour of all rulers in common
to combat and to extirpate." Woe worth the day when such
aspiration, such craving for " abhorred freedom," confined as
yet to Italy, should flood the world !
All monarchs must stand shoulder to shoulder with recip
rocal obligation to help each other against such overthrows of
the State, and, therefore, was the Emperor asking support from
the kings, not because he was himself too weak, but in order
that " sheer terror may pursue rebellious subjects far and wide
when they see that royal armies re-enforce imperial troops and
feel that in similar case imperial help will be due unto the
kings." " Therefore, if the imperial arm," runs the message
to King Bela of Hungary, " is supported by the power of the
kings, if various allied princes are voluntarily bound together
for mutual help : then every impulse to revolt and conspiracy
will cease among the subjects. So seriously had this increased
in the provinces of Italy that though they failed to tear up our
sovereignty by the roots, the rebels carried their vicious example
into the most remote and distant regions, more especially
amongst our neighbours ! "
It is idle to contend that Frederick missed the deeper
meaning of the Lombard insurrection. It was precisely be
cause he fully plumbed the danger that he at all times sought
by the natural alliance of nobility and clergy to rear a bulwark
APPEAL TO KINGS 463
against the emergence of the tiers etat. Hence the emphasis
he laid on his community of interest with the monarchical,
aristocratic Church. He did not succeed in realising the unity
of Empire and Papacy. It lived on in letters and in formulas
only. To meet the menace that threatened the principle of
monarchy, Frederick was, therefore, now obliged to turn to the
secular rulers of Europe in default of the Church. He now
sought to unite all the monarchs of the world in an alliance
under the primacy of the Empire, and win them for a crusade
against the unbelievers and infidels of the State and oijustitia.
The enterprise did not lack a religious element, for the rebels
were setting themselves against the reign of peace which God
had willed : were, therefore, in a sense heretics. Frederick,
logically, re-issued his edicts against heretics. The alliance of
monarchs to combat the principle of freedom from authority
which had come to birth earlier amongst the enlightened
Lombards — the Alemanni at the southern base of the Alps
— constituted the first SECULAR OECUMENICAL ACTION FOR
POLITICAL ENDS in history : a forerunner of the coalitions of
hereditary monarchs against the Jacobins.
Frederick's warning and Frederick's demand met with
response. Extraordinary auxiliaries would be forthwith at
his disposal, first and foremost the forces of the Empire itself
which he had called up at the beginning of the year. Sicily
and Germany were arming, and Diets in Turin, Cremona and
Verona had set everything in motion from Burgundy to the
March of Treviso. King Conrad with his German contingent
reached Verona from the North in the Spring of 1238, and by
the summer an enormous mass of troops had assembled, the
largest and the most heterogeneous army that Frederick ever
commanded. There were the mercenaries, the feudal knights
and the Saracens from Sicily, King Conrad's German Knights,
the forces of Florence and Tuscany, the knights of Northern
Italy, warriors from imperial Lombardy, from Rome, the
Marches, the Romagna, besides foot-soldiers from the imperial
towns, and an army of Burgundian knights who, under the
Count of Provence, were to fight for the first time in the service
464 HETEROGENEOUS HORDES vn
of the Empire. In addition to these almost all the monarchy
of the world had sent auxiliaries : troops from the kings of
England and of France, from King Bela of Hungary, and from
the King of Castile. The eastern monarchs were not to be
outdone, John Vatatzes, Emperor of Nicaea, had sent his
Greeks, and the Sultan his Arabs to fight in the Emperor's
armies.
This mass of troops was followed by the entire, exotic train
of the imperial court, with its menagerie of strange beasts.
People said that since the old days of the circus the like had
not been seen in Italy, and they recalled the war-elephants of
Alexander and Antiochus which they had read of. This was
not the army of a Roman general in whose wake followed the
thunderous tramp of well-drilled legions, but the levy of a
Cosmocrator who commanded men and animals from every
corner of the earth, comparable perhaps to the hordes which
the mighty Persian led of old against the towns of Greece.
Frederick II first led his hosts against the small, high-lying
town of Brescia. A siege was contemplated, and the Emperor
boasted his great stores of siege implements. He had, more
over, commandeered the services of a Spanish engineer,
Calamandrinus, who was pre-eminently inventive in the con
struction of battering-rams and the like. Eccelino had des
patched him to the Emperor : in fetters, so that he might not
escape. Fate willed, however, that the captive should fall into
the hands of the Brescians. They made him welcome with
gifts of hearth and home and a Brescian bride, and he was
forthwith employed in exercising his skill in the service of the
beleaguered town against the Emperor,
The campaign had begun with this stroke of ill-luck and the
Emperor sought in vain to bring about a change of fortune.
In spite of successful skirmishes near Brescia, in spite of great
gallantry amongst individual contingents — the English particu
larly distinguished themselves — the siege made no progress.
Numerous assaults were made, none were successful. The
missiles of Calamandrinus, which found their mark with great
accuracy, destroyed the Emperor's siege equipment. In order
to protect his instruments of war Frederick tied captured
Brescians to his attacking towers. The townsmen showed no
1238 SIEGE OF BRESCIA 465
weak consideration for their fellow-citizens, but retaliated in
similar wise on their imperial prisoners. The fighting con
tinued savagely for weeks. After a fortnight of it, the Emperor,
who had counted on the rapid victory of his immense army,
opened negotiations, but the townsfolk refused to treat. A
plague broke out amongst the cattle in the imperial camp, bad
weather and deluges of rain made the enterprise more difficult,
Frederick's peace-envoy, Bernardo Orlando di Rossi of Parma,
appears to have betrayed his master : instead of persuading
the Brescians to surrender he encouraged them to hold out.
After two months of useless sacrifice, and a final unsuccessful
attack, the Emperor finally broke off the siege in October.
The failure of this elaborate undertaking was almost equiva
lent to a defeat. A crisis was imminent. Frederick dismissed
all his foreign auxiliaries and retained only the German knights.
Success had recently emboldened the Emperor's friends, failure
now offered encouragement to his foes. The Lombards per
ceived how strong their towns were to resist such forces, and
trusted more than ever in their strength. All Italy had breath
lessly awaited the outcome of the struggle, none with greater
attention than Pope Gregory IX. As long as the siege of
Brescia was in progress he prudently refrained from siding
openly with the Lombards. He had even seemed to lean
towards a reconciliation with Frederick, had sent the Minister-
General of the Franciscan Order, Brother Elias of Cortona, a
friend of Frederick's, to the Emperor's court with assurances
that the Pope was anxious to be unus et idem with Frederick.
Scarcely, however, was the end of the siege known than the
Pope threw off his preceding restraint. Frederick II had skil
fully been stirring up all anti-papal forces and gathering them
round him. Pope Gregory was now able to repay him hand
somely in kind.
The imperial fiasco released the Pope from an extremely un
pleasant position, and in spite of his great age he developed an
amazing activity. He must provide what Frederick's foes had
hitherto lacked : a rallying-point and a great common idea.
With fiery zeal Pope Gregory set about retrieving the delay.
466 ANTI-IMPERIAL ALLIANCE vn
The fuse had long since been surreptitiously laid. The inti
mate sympathy of the Pope with the Lombard heretics, rebels
and enemies of the Emperor, was an open secret. He now
appointed Frederick's bitterest enemy, Gregory of Monte-
longo, as Legate of Lombardy. This prelate had begun his
career as a notary of the Roman Curia, and was to end it as
Patriarch of Aquileia. He was cunning and resourceful, well-
versed in every type of political intrigue and subterfuge, and
possessed a knowledge of war unsurpassed in his day. His
skilful manipulations succeeded in uniting all the anti-Kaiser
elements in Lombardy and reconciling the most varied interests.
His great achievement was the creation of a consolidated
opposition to the unified imperial power in Italy. All aspira
tions of the towns and the town parties, by whatever name they
might be called, which were hostile to the Emperor, could be
sure of his assistance, and their short-sighted and hitherto self-
centred squabblings of every kind suddenly gained dignity and
import by being associated on equal terms with a great world
idea, the Papacy. The miscellaneous imperial enemies of
all camps and ranks and strata were no longer rebels and
revolutionaries, but champions and defenders of the oppressed
Church. The name of " Guelf " became a general term for
all enemies of the empire under the leadership of the Church :
patrician and plebeian, heretic and orthodox, layman and priest
rallied together, so that the party division of Ghibelline and
Guelf by no means tallied with the natural, social, religious, or
national cleavages. Very much the reverse : as people rightly
felt, the whole world was involved : no order, no town, no
rank, no family, no individual even, but was rent asunder by
the warring principles of Empire versus Papacy, as the one or
the other in turn prevailed.
The anti-imperial coalition under the Church's leadership
was not merely defensive. Frederick II was, of course, the
challenger, because his very existence was war and battle,
though he sought peace ; but the aggressor who repudiated
every compromise, who aimed at war to the knife was, as has
been generally recognised, the hasty, hot-headed Pope Gregory.
Before he declared himself as an open enemy he had effected
in the Lateran an offensive alliance between Venice and Genoa
NEW NEGOTIATIONS 467
against the Emperor. The two maritime towns who had so
often been at war undertook to render reciprocal assistance, and
swore to make no peace with the Emperor without the Pope's
consent. The papal party, under their Milanese podesta, had
the upper hand in Genoa at the time, and, apart from the threat
to the Trevisan March, the Venetians were feeling peculiarly
embittered by Frederick IPs treatment of their Doge's son,
who had been captured at Cortenuova, dragged in Frederick's
triumph, and was still, to the disgrace of Venice, prisoner in
an Apulian dungeon.
Pope Gregory exploited the resentment against the Emperor
to the full. When he had left the capital in July 1238 to go
to Anagni, at the very moment that the Emperor's powerful
army was marching on Brescia, Rome was almost wholly pro-
Emperor. On his return in October the papal party was
dominant once more. Pope Gregory hastily made up his mind
to breathe more securely by destroying a number of castles
belonging to the Emperor's adherents, palaces dating from
ancient Roman days that were now flying the colours of Anti
christ. Their marbles and mosaics were destroyed. Later,
Frederick II commanded a Sicilian official to restore as far as
possible the ruined buildings at his expense.
Although the Pope was undisguisedly bent on war and work
ing up for a breach he nevertheless resumed negotiations with
the Emperor, not with any intention of an agreement but to gain
time. After the Brescia failure nothing could be less oppor
tune for Frederick than a resumption of open hostilities with
the Curia. He did all that in him lay to avoid a fresh rupture
until a new victory should have altered the situation to his
advantage. He, therefore, displayed the greatest self-restraint.
He called a halt to the organisation of the Italian State already
begun in Western Lombardy, and submitted to an enquiry
before a number of prelates. The Pope lodged a complaint
against the Emperor under fourteen heads. Though the sus
pension of hostilities was to depend on their being disposed of
not one of them dealt with the questions at issue. From the
beginning of his arbitration Pope Gregory had deliberately
forgotten that the Lombards' support of King Henry had been
the fons et origo of the new strife between Court and Curia.
468 PAPAL DUPLICITY vn
He had preferred to ignore the Emperor's justifiable com
plaints, and pick holes in the administration of Sicily. The
issue was at first perfectly clear, but Pope Gregory had con
trived, as of yore in the Crusade question, to conceal and
distort it, and had even been able to lend a religious colour
to the purely political question : who should be master in
Italy.
There is little need to labour the question of the essential
inevitability of the struggle. The personal courage of Pope
Gregory, which led him, in spite of his age, to force his foe to
battle by every means in his power, compels admiration.
These means aimed at so distorting facts that the Emperor
might appear to have injured the Lombards. Ultimately these
methods did more harm to the Pope than to the Emperor.
The fourteen points, whose enunciation was intended to mask
the designs of the Curia, were completely unimportant. They
dealt with the alleged oppression of churches, monasteries and
clergy in Sicily, with the treatment of the Templars and Knights
of St. John, with a Muslim prince whose conversion to Chris
tianity Frederick was supposed to have hindered, and similar
petty accusations which the Emperor was in many cases able
to disprove. It was certainly true that his friends had stirred
up disaffection in Rome against the Pope, though the Emperor
skilfully excused himself: the Pope also had underlings in
Rome who served his ends. Gregory only touched on the
Lombard question, the core of the whole situation, casually and
as a side-issue : he reproached the Emperor with allowing
the cause of the Holy Land to suffer by his Lombard war —
the same old complaint which two years before had stirred the
German princes to indignation.
An understanding might have still been possible on all these
points, especially as the Emperor promised speedy correction
for Sicilian irregularities, but Gregory's whole attitude made
it obvious that he did not want an understanding. Discussions
grew more and more acrimonious. On the Emperor's side
Hermann of Salza, the trusty peacemaker of years, began to
fail. The German Grand Master had come with King Conrad's
troops to Italy, already seriously ill, he was now trying to recruit
his strength in enforced inactivity in Salerno. He could no
ENZIO, FALCONELLO 469
longer be counted on. Meantime the air in Italy grew thun
derous. Frederick's own behaviour did little to relieve the
prevailing tension : as the signs of coming conflict grew plainer
he gave fresh cause of offence. That October saw in Cremona
the festivities that accompanied the knighting of his beloved
son Enzio.
Of all the sons Enzio must have been the most like his
father. Frederick himself called him " in face and figure our
very image." Enzio was the son of a German lady of noble
rank whom Frederick had loved in his early days as German
king, and the proud, handsome boy, with his lithe body, his
medium height, his long golden curls falling to his shoulders,
may have well recalled the picture of the Puer Apuliae men
might otherwise have forgotten. Well built, alert and light of
foot (people even called him falconello), incomparably daring
and fearless, the first in every fight, a hero rejoicing in danger
and bearing many a wound — such is the picture that contem
poraries paint.
The easy freedom and elasticity of his mind matched his
agile body, and the courtly training of the day had given it full
development. He was far from being so learned as his father,
but he was thoroughly cultured, intellectually most receptive,
and a poet to boot. Joy in life and joy in living ring from his
lyrics even when the singer was in prison mourning his fate.
If the father appeared as a Caesar reincarnate, something of
Achilles was reborn in Enzio. A simple straightforward
soldier, singer and king, the mind conjures him up seated
outside the royal tent during a pause in the battle playing the
harp amongst his lighthearted companions.
Enzio's unique charm, which has so often been recorded,
probably lay in this natural grace and simple heartiness : his
enemies even fell victims to it, and it is rare that spite or malice
even graze this handsome lad, though no slander is hateful
enough for the opponents to heap on the rest of the Hohen-
staufens. Legends and tales were woven round this imperial
son, even in his lifetime. They have an epic simplicity, happy,
simple, less " profound " than the anecdotes, always a shade
470 KING OF SARDINIA vn
uncanny and sinister, that gather round the father. A German
dream was Enzio — such as life too rarely yields.
Hard upon Enzio 's knighthood at about twenty followed his
marriage with Adelasia, the heiress of two Sardinian provinces,
by right of which he was entitled " King of Torre and Gallura,"
or King of Sardinia. This marriage had been arranged at
Frederick's wish, but was destined to accentuate the quarrel
with the Roman Curia. For Sardinia was reckoned 'a fief of
the Church which long ago Pisa and Genoa, with papal en
couragement, had plucked from the hands of the Saracen.
Barbarossa, on the other hand, during his struggle with the
Papacy, had granted Sardinia in fee to the sea towns, so that
the Empire now laid claim to the island, and it became like the
Matildine inheritance, a perpetual bone of contention between
popes and emperors. By marrying Enzio to the heiress of the
greater part of the island Frederick expected to acquire new
rights, and he was not to be turned aside by Pope Gregory's
express veto. He had vowed, he said, to win back for the
Empire all the possessions it had lost, and the main factor in
the Pope's wrath at Enzio 's marriage was, he hinted, the fact
that Pope Gregory had coveted the handsome boy for one of
his nieces.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the case the Emperor's
procedure embittered the Pope afresh, and peace was not
easily maintained. Frederick II repeatedly sought to re-estab
lish good relations with the Pope. Gregory, however, only
dallied with the Emperor's envoys, most distinguished men
like Archbishop Berard of Palermo, Count Thomas of Aquino,
Thaddeus of Suessa. He had been long since planning a
breach. The embassy was fruitless. Frederick saw clearly
what was coming. He had taken up his winter quarters in
Padua, intending a lengthy stay, and there the beginning of
1239 found him. He was living with his court in the monastery
of Santa Justina. It was a great honour for the monks, of
course, but no small burden, for they were expected (as were
later the monks of San Zeno in Verona) to entertain an elephant,
five leopards and twenty-four camels, as well as an emperor.
APPEAL TO CARDINALS 471
The Emperor had summoned Eccelino to Padua. His
government of the Trevisan March had been threatened by
the intrigues of his brother Alberigo of Romano, Azzo of Este
and other nobles, who were jealous of Eccelino 's growing
power. The situation must have been eased a little by
Frederick's arrival in person, and by his giving his daughter
Selvaggia in marriage to Eccelino. Similar unrest in Parma
had shortly before been quelled and peace quickly restored by
Frederick's appearance on the spot, the strengthening of the
imperial palace, and Frederick's taking over the office ofpodesta
himself.
Frederick tried to improve matters with the Pope by re
issuing his edicts against heretics, but he must have known the
case was hopeless. A couple of weeks later he tried a new
expedient to avert the threatening ban. He addressed himself
no longer to the Pope but to the cardinals, availing himself of
their divided counsels. In order to subordinate the Pope's
position to the College of Cardinals Frederick evolved a re
markable new theory, in reality an old well-nigh forgotten
theory revived : an expedient which later generations took up
again. The Emperor recalled that the cardinals, the lights and
true representatives of the Church, were also successors of the
apostles. Peter had been only spokesman and executant among
the apostles, not their despotic master, and similarly the Pope,
as successor of Peter, was in all questions of Church policy and
jurisdiction only the president and executive officer of the
cardinals, his equals. Frederick thus sought to appeal to an
oligarchy of the cardinals, amongst whom he had many friends,
instead of to the rigid papal autocracy. It was, he wrote, the
cardinals' business to avert the imminent offence. The ulti
mate responsibility was theirs if the Pope, whom they had
elected to proclaim the gospel, chose to wield the spiritual sword
in the interests of Lombard rebels and heretics against the
Advocate of Rome. For their own prestige, which the Emperor
highly valued, he must beg the college to dissuade the Pope
from his rash enterprise ; the whole world possessed irrefutable
proof that it was based on injustice and domineering caprice.
The cardinals who shared responsibility for whatever occurred
would feel his imperial vengeance : he would have to take steps
472 EXCOMMUNICATION vn
against them, for neither this Pope himself nor his kin were
worthy that the illustrious Empire should waste attention on
him or them. Frederick II was already dubbing the Pope
" unworthy." He himself, he added menacingly, was willing
to bear injustice from the Holy Father, but actual violence he
would requite with the measures " which Caesars are wont to
use."
This ambitious document was the Emperor's last attempt to
preserve peace by threat. He knew exactly what was now at
stake. Deposition and excommunication awaited him as soon
as the breach with Pope Gregory should come. He had no
further power to influence the Pope's decisions. Things must
take their course. He could do nothing but outwardly preserve
an unruffled calm. No one could have divined from his manner
of life the weight of the burden that lay on the whole court.
Those were many care-free days — to all appearance — which he
spent in Padua. Banquets and hunting parties succeeded each
other, and when on Palm. Sunday the Paduans, in accordance
with ancient custom, were making merry on the town common
with every sort of sport the Emperor appeared among them.
From his raised seat as from a throne he watched the proceed
ings with cheerful good-fellowship, while Piero della Vigna
made one of his magnificent speeches, in which he dwelt
specially on the Emperor's affection and goodwill towards the
people of Padua. None could have guessed that at that Tery
moment the Pope's ban had fallen. Frederick's letter to the
cardinals, from which he had expected great things, arrived
too late. It is quite possible that the Pope had got wind of it,
and fearful perhaps of the cardinals' intervention, had antici
pated Maundy Thursday, which was the usual opportunity for
proclaiming excommunications. Determined to postpone the
fight no longer he acted swiftly, perhaps over-hastily.
On that same Sunday, while Frederick in Padua was watching
the amusements of the people, Gregory IX excommunicated
the Emperor for the second time. From henceforth at every
High Mass, in every church throughout the world, every priest,
to the accompaniment of bell and of burning tapers, should
proclaim Frederick's extrusion from the community of the
faithful. Simultaneously all subjects of Frederick were re-
1239 DEATH OF HERMANN OF SALZA 473
leased from their oaths of fealty. Not one syllable of Gregory's
pronouncement hinted that the Lombards had been the cause
of strife : the whole cause of the ban was sought in the Sicilian
differences.
The die was cast. By a fateful coincidence the great German
Grand Master, Hermann of Salza, died on that Palm Sunday
in Salerno. His life had been devoted to preserving the unity
of Empire and Papacy. It had lost all meaning. The ideal
picture of a Pope and Emperor perfectly balanced and perfectly
united in a perfectly-organised world, that had floated before
the mind of Europe for centuries, was shattered for ever. The
ruthless, savage combat d entrance between the two powers
began, though the monstrous strife that overstrained the
strength of both antagonists, and in a few years devoured the
hoarded wealth of centuries, was destined to remain indecisive.
The Interregnum and Avignon are the graves of the Middle
Ages and of Christian world dominance.
When the news of the excommunication reached the Emperor
in Padua a week later there was a moment of consternation.
Frederick summoned the Paduans to the town-hall. Piero della
Vigna had to address them a second time in the name of the
Emperor, and scarcely had he ceased speaking than, to the
amazement of the people, the monarch himself lifted up his
voice from his elevated seat to defend himself against the pre
cipitate action of the Pope. The tension was relieved. The
Emperor quitted Padua. The paralysing uncertainty that had
condemned him to inactivity during the leaden-footed months
of suspense was ended, and was replaced in the twinkling of
an eye by an almost feverish activity. He could no\\r develop
without let or hindrance. In those last months of oppressive
strain, when everything had to be done with the utmost silence
and caution, Piero della Vigna had warned the Grand Justiciar
of Sicily to beware of irritating the sensitiveness of the Roman
Curia by any measure not expressly sanctioned by the Emperor,
lest he should thereby pour oil on the fire and set the whole of
Italy ablaze. No such consideration now prevailed. The long-
dammed wrath burst forth. The Emperor addressed the world
474 FREE TO FIGHT vii
in thunderous manifestos and pamphlets full of passion, pro
voking thereby from the Curia reproaches and retorts not less
vehement. These were the flourishes of the trumpets before
the battle. Actions soon succeeded each other headlong.
Frederick at last was free to develop all his rich resources in
their full magnificence.
To turn to the fighting. . . . The campaign against the
Lombard rebels had become a side issue. In spite of it an
unprecedented work of reorganisation was accomplished within
a few months. Hither and thither, to and fro, in every direc
tion Frederick crossed and re-crossed Northern Italy. The
announcement of the ban had cheered the rebels, the Curia
intrigued through its legates everywhere, and conflagrations
were breaking out in various places. Frederick hastened from
Padua to Treviso, then back to Padua, and off again to Vicenza
to make sure of the nobles of the Trevisan March who, under
Margrave Azzo of Este, Eccelino's enemy, were inclined to quit
the Emperor's cause. The Emperor could do little to prevent
it. The Margrave, who had recently sworn good faith, betrayed
him. In the middle of May Treviso was surprised, and the
imperial podesta, Jacob of Morra, driven out. In the middle
of June Azzo of Este went over to the enemy, and other nobles
with him. A solemn session was held in Verona, and Piero
della Vigna, seated on horseback, was commanded to proclaim
the imperial ban against them.
At the end of June the hitherto completely loyal town of
Ravenna suddenly seceded. The Emperor himself hastened
to Cremona, where Cardinal Sinibald Fiesco, later Pope Innocent
IV, had stirred up the people, and Paulus Traversarius^otfota
of Ravenna, had driven out the Emperor's adherents, though
his only daughter was said to be a hostage in the Emperor's
hands. The protection of Ravenna had been entrusted to
Bologna and to Venice. Frederick rapidly marched out from
Cremona into the Romagna for a campaign against the Bolog-
nese. The territories without the town were laid waste, and
two fortresses, Piumazzo and Crevalcore, were conquered
within a fortnight. By the end of August the Emperor was
again in Parma, where signs of unrest had shown themselves
the year before, and, finally, from mid-September till the
ATTACK ON SICILY 475
beginning of November, he was prosecuting the war under
circumstances of the gravest difficulty against Milan and against
Piacenza, the Curia's latest ally. Frederick had no intention
of trying actually to take these towns any more than Bologna,
He had no time for long-drawn sieges. He had weightier tasks
in hand.
He did his best to compel the town troops to accept battle
in the open. If they evaded it he wasted their town lands,
which caused them sensible loss. He did not succeed, how
ever, as with his considerable superiority in force he had
doubtless hoped, in repeating Cortenuova. Each time he ad
vanced against Milan, after conquering and burning down
several fortresses on various sides, the Milanese simply gave
way or retreated to their town under cover of trenches and
hastily drained water-courses. Frederick was in this way suc
cessful in inducing Como and some neighbouring towns to
forsake the Milanese and come over to his side. This was an
important gain, for Como was " the key to the passage from
Germany to Italy/' as the Emperor wrote to King Conrad.
The Julier and Septimer Passes, and possibly the St. Gothard
also, were now open to him as well as the Brenner. Just before
the onset of winter, Frederick had hastily undertaken a new
venture, the capture of a new bridge-head which Piacenza had
recently built on the Po. Continuous rain fell for days, the
Po flooded its banks, the bridge-head was inaccessible, and the
effort had to be abandoned.
The fighting had only just begun, the Emperor was still in
the Bologna terrain, when the Curia compelled him to turn his
thoughts to other things. The alliance which Pope Gregory
had engineered between Venice and Genoa was widened by
the inclusion of Piacenza and Milan, and, finally, of the Roman
Curia itself. The agreement was that none of the contracting
parties, not even the Pope, should make peace with the Em
peror without the concurrence of the others, and, further, that
Venice and Genoa should land troops — their own and the
Pope's— in Sicily. A great attack on Sicily, the basis of the
imperial power, was planned. They reckoned that six months
476 PAPAL PROGRAMME vn
would suffice for the campaign, and the distribution of the spoils
had been agreed upon. The Pope would keep the whole king
dom quod est beati Petri patrimonium. Venice would be re
warded by the harbours of Barletta and Salpi, and Genoa by
the restoration of her bitterly-mourned Syracuse, and both
should receive compensation in other ways also for their
expenses. This was the programme of the group of compact
allies whom Frederick had now to face.
The Emperor saw his Sicilian kingdom gravely imperilled.
Even if he was at first unacquainted with these secret arrange
ments, which is most unlikely, he must from his previous
experience have been fully prepared for the invasion of Sicily
by a papal army as soon as one had been mustered. He could
not break off the war in Northern Italy, but he must seek at
the same time so to secure his territories on every side that
they would be strong enough not only to ward off attack but
to pursue the even tenor of their way. Sicily must surpass
her previous achievements in raising money and war-material.
Complete reorganisation was necessary to put the kingdom on
a war footing, for the country was at the moment being governed
by a Council of the Household Officers (consisting of the Grand
Justiciar Henry of Morra, Count Thomas of Aquino, the Arch
bishop Berard of Palermo and two other prelates) to whom
Frederick had entrusted the regency during his absence. This
independent council would no longer be serviceable. The
outbreak of war with the Church involved Sicily's meeting the
ever-varying demands of the Emperor fighting in the North,
in addition to her own normal requirements. The Council
could not divine what Frederick's needs might be. The
Emperor must, therefore, resume the direct government of
Sicily himself.
One difficulty of his doing so was that since he had left his
hereditary dominions for Germany nearly five years before he
had not set foot in them again ; another, that he could not for
the present dream of returning ; and, finally, that the communi
cations with Sicily by land were still severed by the Papal
State. The reorganisation and mobilisation of Sicily had,
therefore, to be conducted under circumstances of the utmost
difficulty in accordance with instructions sent by the Emperor
REORGANISATION OF SICILY 477
from North Italy. Nothing but the well-planned, well-oiled
machinery of the Sicilian State made this possible.
It was soon manifest what the will of one individual could
accomplish in a minimum of time when backed by a brilliantly
drilled, unspoiled bureaucracy, working at high presssure.
The Household Officers were superseded, the central authori
ties of Sicily : Administration, Justice, Chancery, were linked
up directly with the Court, as it hastened to and fro in North
Italy from one battle to another. Earlier pledges to the Curia
to keep the administration of Sicily separate from that of the
Empire were no longer binding. There was now one uniform
imperial administration, one Supreme Court, one common
imperial Chancery, one imperial Treasury ; no longer a Sicilian,
but an Imperial Fleet, under an Imperial Admiral. The
highest official of Sicily, the Grand Justiciar, Henry of Morra,
could no longer represent the Emperor in Sicily, because his
permanent presence with the Court was necessary. In order
that the justiciars might not, meanwhile, lack supervision, the
Sicilian justiciarates were divided into two groups, each of
which was under a Captain or Grand Justiciar : peninsular
Sicily, under the tried and trusty Andrew of Cicala, who fre
quently submitted independent suggestions to the Emperor ;
island Sicily, under Roger de Amicis, already well known as
one of the poets. To avoid " confusion of numbers " and
" permanence of appointments " the number and the tenure
of the officials was normalised for each province on the simplest
possible basis : one Justiciar, one High Treasurer ; with each
Justiciar, one Judge and one Notary ; all with tenure for one
year only. The kingdom had, therefore, a tighter grip than ever
on its officials ; the constitutional structure was more symme
trical, more rigid, more transparent than ever. It is to this
period that Frederick's phrase belongs : " Sicily shall be the
envy of princes, the pattern of monarchies " — invidia principum
et norma regnorum.
The entire Sicilian administration was now centred in the
Emperor's court in Northern. Italy. The burden was lifted
from Frederick's shoulders by the Chancery, which was admir
ably organised under its two heads: Piero della Vigna and
Thaddeus of Suessa. The mass of work to be dealt with was
478 SPEED vii
stupendous. All orders had necessarily to be in writing. All
imperial instructions had to be issued through the Chancery,
which, therefore, had to follow the Emperor hither and thither
in all his campaigning, whether his headquarters were in town
or camp. Not for a day was the flow of orders interrupted.
The name and date on the documents show that on marching
days the Chancery worked all morning till the moment of
starting, and resumed work immediately on arrival. The
notaries had countless other business to attend to, since the
Sicilian and Imperial Chanceries were not amalgamated.
When we reflect that dozens of written orders of every descrip
tion were issued daily (some days up to thirty or forty or even
more) all drafted in careful style, all in two or three copies ; that
there were in addition constant circulars to the Justiciars, we
get some idea of the labour which fell on the six or eight writers
and six or eight transmitters. In these days of crisis all work
must have been done at the highest possible pressure and at a
speed that contrasts with the leisureliness of earlier Chanceries.
The Emperor showed not the smallest compunction about
overworking his secretaries : at least one-third of the orders
issued were concerned solely with his personal hobbies : horses,
hounds, falcons, and the chase. Frederick, however, truly said
that he worked night and day, and that " his majesty, ever ware
and waking, slumbered not neither slept." The characteristic
of the new life was speed : its watchword : non sit quiescendum,
continue sit agendum, and the whirring pace of the court corre
sponded. The courtiers streamed in and out unceasingly,
mostly Sicilian messengers. The land route through the papal
patrimonium was for the most part unsafe — the greatest caution
was enjoined on all who used it — and a sort of express service
was arranged by sea from Pisa to Naples. Pisan galleys, im
perial galleys, and swift sailing yachts were utilised. Troops,
corn, cash, and courtiers with important despatches were sent
to and fro by sea, and depots established at Naples and Pisa.
The swift conveyance of despatches was highly prized, and
officials reaped rich rewards for speed. To deal the more
rapidly with the whole, the subordinate personnel and the
writing staff were increased.
SICILY SEALED 479
The prime necessity was to secure Sicily against attack. All
the important fortresses, which in peace time were garrisoned
by one chatelain and a few men, were well manned, partly by
mercenaries, partly by fief holders. Monte Cassino, for in
stance, near the papal frontier, was allotted one hundred men,
other castles were speedily equipped with cross-bowmen and
missile-throwing engines. Every means was taken to get pos
session of important fortresses. Prudence must be exercised
and scandal avoided, but Castle Cerro must here be taken over,
and there certain border strongholds in the Abruzzi which
belonged to a Sicilian knight or abbot. The participation
of Genoa and Venice in the war gave increased importance
to coast defence. The watching towers, which were always
manned against pirates during the shipping season, were more
strongly garrisoned, and the construction of coast castles at
Bari, Trani, and Otranto was expedited.
As a preliminary to all other measures the entire kingdom
must be bolted and barred and transformed into a single mighty
fortress. The frontiers throughout Sicily were rigidly closed.
Every communication with the enemy was dangerous and must
be prevented. People wishing to enter the kingdom needed a
passport. The Emperor would permit no stranger to travel,
buy or sell in his territories unless he bore on his right hand
the mark and the number of his name, till enemies made merry
about the passport regulations. Ships might only enter certain
specified harbours ; even to enable merchants more con
veniently to load or unload, no exception was permitted. The
ships arriving in harbour were strictly searched by imperial
officials, the crew and passengers minutely cross-examined —
the birthplace of each, whence he came, whither he was going
and why. None might leave the ship before the examination,
none might leave the kingdom without the Emperor's per
mission. Above all, papers and letters were forbidden. To
bring a letter into Sicily required the imperial permission in
each separate case. If such permission had not been obtained
the bearer was hanged.
All communication with Rome was strictly forbidden. A
man from Caserta was carrying a perfectly harmless letter from
the Pope about a benefice for his son. He was imprisoned and
480 SICILIAN CHURCH vn
his property confiscated " on account of his audacity." A non-
Sicilian bishop who had some important documents to hand
over was instructed to deliver them to the Justiciar at the frontier,
but not to set foot in the kingdom. The Emperor sought above
all to prevent the intellectual poisoning of his hereditary do
mains. Hence, students from the rebel towns were forbidden
to study in Naples.
Concurrently with the sealing up of Sicily against the outer
world the country itself had to be cleansed of suspicious
elements. Within a few weeeks of the Emperor's excommuni
cation the necessary orders were issued relative to suspect
Sicilian clergy. The mendicant friars, the Pope's favourite
spies and agents for stirring up insurrection, were expelled.
At first only those who were natives of the rebellious towns were
banished, later all without discrimination. The lands of the
non-Sicilian clerics were confiscated. No priest might go to
Rome without the Emperor's orders. The loyal Sicilian clerics
who happened to be in Rome on any business must return to
Sicily without a moment's delay, on pain of losing their pos
sessions and forfeiting the right of subsequent return.
In addition to all this the justiciars were instructed to
assemble all the bishops and clerics of their province and to tell
them in the name of the Emperor : the Emperor wished the
services of the Church to be continued, in spite of the papal
ban ; no priest would be compelled to celebrate High Mass, but
if any pretermitted the services the worldly possessions of his
Church would be forfeit. Further, the omission to conduct
service was considered suspicious, a sign that the priest was
more ready to obey Pope than Emperor, and this often sufficed
to lead to banishment or the gallows. There was a humble
cleric who had begged the Emperor to grant a rescript making
his bastard sons legitimate. When the document came he
whimpered that now perhaps the Emperor's excommunication
would invalidate it. Frederick banished him " for his shame
less impudence " and confiscated his property.
Pope Gregory had complained about the oppression of the
Sicilian clergy, and professed to have excommunicated the Em
peror on this account. Frederick now gave him some oppression
to complain about. Since he had had his first quarrel with the
SUSPECTS 481
great Innocent as a boy of fourteen, the Emperor's desire had
been to build up in Sicily an episcopate independent of Rome.
He could now proceed to do so without remorse. Amongst
some one hundred and forty-five sees in the Sicilian kingdom
there were at the moment thirty-five vacancies. These were
either left vacant or filled by trusty supporters of Frederick,
here a notary, there a nephew of the chamberlain Richard, in
another see another loyalist. Archbishop Berard of Palermo,
who as the most faithful adherent of Frederick, had also been
excommunicated, became the head of the Sicilian Church.
Rome had here lost all weight, and the longer the ban lasted
the more unimportant she became. A priest who applied for
a bishopric without the Emperor's leave was called on to answer
for it to the Court. The sternest watch was kept to see that
all imperial orders were carried out.
By such measures the Sicilian Church was rapidly purged.
All who remained were loyal to the Emperor, and the future
proved them completely trustworthy. A large number of
bishops had first to be got rid of on the most various grounds :
unquestionably all who had sided with the Pope in Frederick's
first breach over the Crusade. In this matter the Emperor
dealt out banishment and confiscation of property to clergy and
laity alike. The justiciars were ceaselessly commissioned to
investigate all cases against suspects of this sort, and the little
notebook which all suspects were obliged to carry about with
them must have considerably lightened the task of the officials.
The feudal nobility who had participated in the rebellion of
1229 were mercilessly banished with their families. As
Frederick punished all relatives of heretics to the second
generation " that they might know God to be a jealous God,
visiting the sins of the fathers upon the children," so he turned
out the relatives of the rebels whether clerics or laymen. The
measures adopted towards the feudal nobility were, however,
varied. Some of them were despatched to join the imperial
armies in Lombardy and some shipped off to the army
in Palestine. Pope Gregory had already complained that
Frederick was misusing his sacred kingdom of Jerusalem as a
penal settlement for political criminals and suspects, and the
process naturally did not now cease. A knight who had quitted
482 SECRET SERVICE vn
the Syrian army without permission was imprisoned. Another
who had left the Court without leave shared his fate, while a
third for similar reasons was sent in chains to Malta. In such
cases the Emperor also banished the families of the exiles, while,
on the other hand, he held the families of his own supporters
as hostages for their good faith. The instructions to send
fighting men or subordinate officials to Italy " who are of loyal
stock and who have brothers and sons in Sicily " becomes a
recurrent formula. These were then his hostages on whom
he could if necessary wreak vengeance. He had a sufficient
number of hostages from every town, and it is to be understood
that he never hesitated a moment to avenge himself on them.
When the Venetians gave him trouble he immediately hanged
the Doge's son, Pietro Tiepolo. He is said to have burnt
the daughter of Paulus Traversarius, the renegade podesta of
Ravenna. When an opportunity offered to take Pope Gregory's
brother prisoner Frederick immediately responded and wrote
that the proposal pleased him and would please him still better
if successfully carried out : the official in question could not
render him a more welcome service. He is alleged — but the
accusation is probably unfounded — to have hanged all Pope
Gregory's blood relations. He admitted himself that he hated
the whole " breed."
This system undoubtedly breathed immense suspicion and
mistrust. But Frederick II would have been lost without these
qualities, which he shares with every great man whose position
has been equally precarious. It was the Tyranny in action,
but it is impossible to conceive Sicily or Italy without tyrants.
Under this system denunciation flourished more and more
luxuriantly, which had both drawbacks and advantages. The
accusers were frequently prompted by purely personal spite
(a blood feud, for instance, once entered into the matter), but
each case had to be exactly investigated. In this process all
sorts of facts came to light, even corruption and deceit on the
part of the officials who, especially in the later phases, fre
quently allowed themselves to be bought off by the accused.
These denunciations were part and parcel of the secret service
which the Emperor urgently required, " I have messengers
and envoys everywhere, and hear all that is going on/' Frederick
BENEVENTO DESTROYED 483
once stated to the General of the Dominicans. It was perfectly
true that he enjoyed that omniscience which goes with great
ness. From his camp before the walls of Milan he was able to
inform the justiciar of the Abruzzi that a number of people
quoted by name had secretly exchanged gifts with the rebels.
Would the official kindly look into the matter and hang the
guilty "as a punishment for themselves and as a terror to
others." At about the same time he pointed out to the justiciar
of the Terra Laboris that a Capuan from his province was
resident in Rome : his property should be sequestrated. He
learnt that certain Templars in disguise were bringing moneys
to assist the rebels : he begged the Grand Master of the Order
to put a stop to this.
His purification of the kingdom would have been incomplete
if he had not eliminated the papal enclave at Benevento. As
the focus of the Curia's hostile propaganda, whence resistance
to the Emperor was organised, Benevento must have been in
very deed " a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence."
Numerous Sicilians who were adherents of the Pope had taken
refuge there till Frederick finally commanded that no one
should be allowed to return from Benevento into Sicily, the
town should be besieged, all exit prevented, and all supplies cut
off. " May she perish of hunger and rot in the pestilent free
dom she herself has chosen. ..." In 1241 Benevento was
completely destroyed.
By such measures the security of Sicily, internal and external,
was assured in the shortest possible time. The kingdom was
not only to enjoy peace but to employ its peace to find money
and war-material for the Emperor. Again and again he wrote
that his coffers were empty and he needed money. He had
already raised loans in every direction at incredible rates of
interest : in Siena, in Parma, from a certain Henry Bauni,
merchant of Vienna, and especially from the Romans. He may
have had a political motive in applying to them. It was useful
to make the widest circles possible interested in the success of
the imperial arms. If the Emperor failed, the Roman creditors
would stand a good chance of losing their money. The mer-
484 FINANCIAL EXPEDIENTS vn
chants thus harnessed to the Emperor's fortunes could help in
many ways to forward his Roman plans. There were many
small groups of three or four merchants who combined to
advance a couple of hundred ounces, an ounce of gold being
approximately two and a half guineas. The total number of
ounces borrowed from Rome ran into tens of thousands, so
that a proportionate number of merchants were involved : from
one statement of accounts alone we learn close on eighty names
of creditors.
The Emperor's need of money, if only to pay his mercenaries,
had grown immense. This is where Sicily had to help. First
a new tax was instituted from which neither clergy nor officials
were, as heretofore, exempt. New coins were struck, which
did not, however, necessarily imply any debasement of the
currency. The old coins had to be exchanged for new, and the
commission charged for the exchange brought in appreciable
sums, since money-changing was a state monopoly. The
Emperor gave orders that the precise proportion of alloy in the
new coins was to be kept secret so that foreign merchants might
not assess them solely on their intrinsic metal value.
The Emperor further called in without exception all arrears
of taxes due. According to old law the incomes of all vacant
bishops' sees flowed direct into the coffers of the State except
so far as they were expended on the upkeep of the churches.
On financial grounds the Emperor was not unduly keen on new
appointments, though political considerations sometimes out
weighed economic ones. The whole financial administration
was now more strictly organised. A Court of Exchequer was
set up in Melfi, and all officials had to submit their accounts
back to the year 1220. The entire official expenditure of the
past twenty years was carefully re-examined, and the officials
were personally liable to make good any deficit out of their
private means. All balances in hand were simultaneously
checked. In addition, the Emperor commissioned an expert
to seek for buried treasure.
The Emperor's trade in corn was a further source of revenue.
His transactions were extensive. That shipment to Tunis which
brought in almost £75,000 had been arranged from Lodi. The
Emperor raised large sums in Vienna in exchange for mere
R<5LE OF SICILY 48S
orders on Sicilian corn. The galleys which conveyed Lombard
prisoners from Pisa to Apulia were instructed to use their empty
space to bring back corn on their return. Part of this supplied
the army's needs and part was sold to the Pisans, though the
Emperor did not want to profiteer at the expense of that loyal
town. He had no scruple on the other hand about making
money out of the Venetians. For, although he was at war with
them, the Emperor did not want to lose a paying customer, and
he permitted the export of provisions to Venice, " but prudently,
so that it may not appear a general permission . ' ' The Venetians
had equally little scruple in buying from " the enemy." The
Genoese were at first also allowed to use Sicilian harbours.
Under strict supervision, this involved little danger to the
Emperor, but later all trade with both towns was forbidden.
The State also made money out of pilgrims : one-third of the
fare to Syria had to be paid into the Treasury. All sale of
horses out of the country was strictly forbidden. Mention has
already been made of the great workshops which manufactured
armour and equipment ; they were kept working at full
pressure.
All the resources of Sicily were now strained to supply the
Emperor with what he needed for the Italian war. Thanks to
the efficient and well-disciplined officials the entire reorgani
sation of the kingdom was possible, without any serious hitch,
in spite of the absence of the ruler. But the Emperor could
not leave the pick of his younger officials in Sicily : he wanted
large numbers for Italy. Sicily began to suffer the fate that
always overtakes the homeland of a conqueror : she was un
duly drained of strength which served the monarch's world
dominion but not the State herself. Frederick II had -had, as
a young Emperor, to reconquer his ruined kingdom ; during
his lawgiving period he had shown himself in wonderful har
mony with his new-created State ; now, as Caesar, he had far
outgrown the State in which he had his roots, and he now drew
means and might from her to overcome and harmonise the
larger world without. With other rulers of the same calibre
that would have meant at his age an overflowing into distant
regions : Frederick IFs case was different. His world-empire
was Italy, and he poured means and men not into distant lands
486 RECONSTRUCTION OF ITALY vii
but into the core of the ancient imperium which more and more
sucked the life-blood of the universe.
At the same uncanny speed and in the same masterful fashion
the Grand Seignory of Italy was now established whose capital
was to be Rome, Soon after his excommunication Frederick
announced " our heart yearns to see Italy re-established under
the imperial banner." No further consideration need be ex
tended to the Pope. As priest Gregory had excommunicated
the Emperor ; as Italian prince and Ruler of the States of the
Church he had declared war by allying himself with Venice,
Genoa and the rest ; Frederick could, without scruple, extend
the boundaries of his Italian domain even further than he had
originally intended. There was no need for tenderness to
wards the States of the Church, least of all the two imperial
provinces, the March of Ancona and Spoleto which Frederick
had been compelled as a boy to renounce, and which most in
conveniently barred his passage from Italy to Sicily. Frederick
declared these two " natural provinces of the Empire " con
fiscate, and in accordance with Roman law justified this resump
tion of the two districts of which a gift had been made to the
Pope, by the simple phrase " ingratitude of the recipient/'
By the time that Frederick made this announcement the organ
isation of the new realm was already well under way.
The creative construction was speedy, thorough and drastic ;
within a few months, lo ! the State stood there complete. It
usually required decades if not centuries during the Middle
Ages for much slighter reconstructions gradually to work them
selves out. Frederick II suddenly evolved a new, rational
constitution for Italy and carried it through at one swoop. It
is true that certain preliminaries had been disposed of some
years before. At the Diet of Turin, immediately after the
victory of Cortenuova which opened Italy to him, Frederick
had instituted the first Vicariate General or Captaincy General
(the new provinces were called by either name and their
governors were either Vicars General or Captains General).
This was the province known as " Upper Pavia," which
embraced West Lombardy and Piedmont. The main work
VICARIATES GENERAL 487
was done now, however, as a counter measure to the Pope's
attack.
The excommunication silenced the last of Frederick's
scruples, and he immediately completed, with the utmost speed,
what he had already begun. His hasty journeys to and fro
through Italy were not only campaigns against the rebels :
wherever he appeared a new province sprang, fully organised,
to life. The news of the excommunication reached him in
Padua at the beginning of April 1239. O*1 Ma7 Ist he in~
augurated the Vicariate General of the Trevisan March, in June,
probably during his stay in Cremona, that of " Lower
Pavia " with Cremona roughly as its centre. The kingdom
of Burgundy was at the same time constituted a Vicariate
General and incorporated into the Italian system, though less
strictly dragooned than the other provinces. Still in tfcat same
June, at the time of the Bologna campaign, Frederick added
the Romagna to the others, first as an immediate Vicariate and
later as a Vicariate General. The campaign against Piacenza
and Milan caused a short interruption till a successful winter
campaign opened central Italy. Under circumstances similar
to the Romagna's Frederick in December 1239 incorporated
the Ligurian coast province under the name of the " Luni-
giana " ; this was later enlarged by the addition of the Versiglia
and Garfagnana, and raised to the rank of a Vicariate General.
In January 1240 the Vicariate General of Tuscany followed,
and in the same month two further creations, that of the Ancona
March and of the Duchy of Spoleto. In February the con
quered portions of the States of the Church, papal Tuscany, in
particular, with Viterbo as its centre, were formed into a
Vicariate General, " from Amelia through the Maritima to
Corneto." A year later Frederick created the province of Narni
also from Church territory. If we add to these the two new
provinces of Sicily which adjoined on the South we find the
whole of Italy, with the exception of a few remaining fragments
of the Patrimonium and the few rebel towns, clearly and con
sistently organised in one solid block, and working under one
unified imperial administration ruled by the iron will of the
Italian Super-Tyrant.
The whole organism of this State, which the excommunicate
A SUPER TYRANT vii
Emperor had fashioned under war conditions, was fluid and
elastic for all its massiveness and solidity, and according to the
fortunes of war or other needs could be regrouped as necessary.
The large Captaincies General like Tuscany, Upper Pavia
and others were subdivided as required into Captaincies, some
what as the justiciars' provinces were. The new State was
fashioned with some exactness on the Sicilian model, only the
new creation was incomparably more powerful. Beside the
mighty machinery of this imperial State Sicily appeared like
some finely chiselled toy. A few indications will reveal the
character of the world-monarchy that was enshrined in Italy.
Every great man meets sooner or later with world opposition,
a united resistance from the peoples who feel themselves
threatened. Frederick II met this coalition of hostile powers
not on the periphery of his domains, on the unthreatened
frontiers of the Roman Empire, but in its innermost recesses
in the Caesar-Papacy and the Lombard towns. He had to
operate with all the human and material resources of his out
lying lands and peoples, even seeking support from foreign
kings in East and West, in order to consolidate the universal
state in the very centre of his Empire. The narrow compass
of Italy saw the concentration and accumulation of these forces.
This is the beginning of that concentration of a maximum of
might in a minimum of space which characterises the Renais
sance. In the centre of it all towered Rome, the capital of the
world, the goal desired. Centering on Rome there arises that
unique Super-seignory of Italy which shows in incredible
concentration all the characteristics of a world-empire like
Napoleon's. Dignity and importance were lent to this crea
tion of a State by the passion and intensity with which the
hostile powers organised their opposition, in whose despite
Frederick II succeeded in establishing his despotism in its
naked simplicity and grandeur.
The spirit of the new State was akin to that of the Sicilian
Tyranny ; the commissions of the officials expressed the same
state philosophy and doctrines of salvation ; but apart from
such byelaws as the organisation of the bureaucracy rendered
BUREAUCRACY IN ITALY 489
necessary there was no need for fresh legislation. Frederick IPs
Grand Seignory revived the Imperium Romanum, Italy was to
live again under the standards of the Caesars ; it was axiomatic
that Roman law should rule in the new Roman provinces.
The Italian towns had long ago adopted and administered
Roman law. The new event was that a great State, fulfilled
with the spirit of the Roman law, had come again to birth in
the very heart of the Empire ; that the provinces of Italy were
again parts of a monumental whole which a new Caesar, with
his officials, held firmly in his grip ; that a new Augustus again
administered justice according to ancient formulas, from whose
rule the salvation of the world should spring. The Renovatio
Imperil Romanorum had been accomplished on Italian soil.
Frederick II had quietly abandoned his first intention of filling
all the provincial governorships with Romans " of the blood of
Romulus." Handicapped by the papal ban he needed the
most trustworthy agents he could command, and only Sicily
supplied them.
The new government had been speedily and drastically in
troduced, its strict and exact operation was no less drastic.
There was no existing constitution to which it could be linked,
as there had been in Sicily, so existing institutions had for the
most part simply to be swept away. Imperial authority in
Italy had hitherto been exercised solely through the imperial
legates, invariably German bishops and German nobles.
There had originally been one single legate only for the whole
of Italy, but as early as 1222 Frederick II had divided this
unmanageably large district into two legations, one for Northern
and one for Central Italy. These German imperial legates with
wide powers and long terms of office enjoyed considerable
independence, but their influence was nevertheless limited by
having no substructure of subordinate officials. They floated
vaguely as it were in space. There was no place for them in
the new efficient intensive administration of the Emperor, and
they were abolished. Their wide districts were broken up into
the various Vicariates General, which permitted firm and im
mediate action. Instead of the independent legate, represen
tative of the Emperor, dependent officials were installed to be
the Emperor's executive officers, probably enjoying the civil
490 LEGATE GENERAL vn
and military powers of a justiciar. Finally, instead of the
lengthy tenure of office which had been the prerogative of the
legation, the short term usual in Sicily was introduced even for
Vicars General, and exchange of officers was frequent, if not
invariable, to avoid any fraternisation with the ruled. When
these imperial officials were posted as podestas in an important
town the town was most strictly forbidden to elect a successor at
the expiry of their year of office, as had been the Italian custom.
The old title of Legate was preserved in one case only :
King Enzio was styled Legate General for the whole of Italy.
He was tied to no province, but free to act where circumstances
made action desirable. He was the Emperor's viceroy.
Frederick was thus able simply to double throughout Italy the
influence of his presence and personality by his son, his ** living
image." Enzio was placed over the Vicars General, who had
to accept his orders as his father's, though they derived their
authority like Enzio himself direct from the Emperor and not
through the Legate General.
With few exceptions the appointment of officials even of the
lowest grades was reserved for the Emperor alone. This was
in Italy as in Sicily the basis of Frederick's absolute monarchy.
Through the length and breadth of Italy the will of the Emperor
must be supreme down to the lowest strata in the State. There
was no room in the imperial State for independently elected
authorities, whether feudal or municipal. Henceforward, with
due allowance for varying local conditions, one uniform im
perial administration was to prevail. Marches and Palatinates
were as far as possible incorporated in the Empire, especially
if their holders were disaffected. Many of the great nobles,
especially in the North, were given office in the service of the
State. The rights of feudal lords and the rights of towns,
however, were recognised only with reservations, and only in
so far as they did not run counter to the general organisation
of the State. The custom which the Communes had had of
choosing from a friendly town an independent podesta for
themselves had now to be given up. The annual governor of
the more important towns was now appointed by the Emperor
from amongst the Vicars General, or else the Emperor took the
post in his own name and appointed a representative. Here
THE APULIAN YOKE 491
and there the right of electing a podesta was conceded, but
hedged by such restrictions that in fact the actual choice was
the Emperor's. No loophole was left by which a podesta could
be elected who was not persona grata to the Emperor.
Frederick II had thus in a short time extended his imperial
bureaucracy over the whole of Italy. In addition to the Vicars
General and imperial podestas an army of sub-vicars, fortress-
captains, finance officials, judicial and chancery officers, and
various subordinates held the country in subjection. The
official discipline was as usual extremely severe. To facilitate
supervision the Vicars General were obliged to submit lists of
all posts vacant in their provinces, and also salary-lists. For
the officials were paid direct from Frederick's treasury or else
from the revenues of the towns entrusted to them, but subject
to fixed standards. Officials were instructed to be satisfied
with their salary, to keep their hands clean and to avoid simony,
which was sternly penalised. An official hierarchy was estab
lished throughout Italy in opposition to, or more accurately in
supersession of, the clerical hierarchy. The position of Church
and episcopate was unambiguous : the Caesar accursed of the
Church had created the State, and no writ but his could run
therein.
The most radical change was in the personnel itself of the
new government. Hitherto the imperial services in Italy had
employed one or two German legates, and the government of
the towns had been directed by podestas from the aristocracy
of Northern Italy. Suddenly a horde of Apulians flooded the
country. Every stratum of the service was mainly, if not
wholly, staffed by Apulians experienced in the work, whose
loyalty was guaranteed by the property and families they had
left behind in Sicily. The students of Bologna taunted the
cities whose internal dissensions had brought them to such a
pass that " they must render tribute to Caesar and weep under
the Apulian yoke/' It was a foreign rule — but the rule of
South Italians, not of Germans — which spread through the
land. With the exception of the two quondam pages, the
Hohenburg brothers, who were appointed to governorships, no
492 FREDERICK'S OFFICIALS vn
German had any share in the administration* The two
Hohenburgs, like the Apulian nobles, had been schooled in the
Emperor's immediate entourage, and Frederick now made the
general pronouncement that he was entrusting these important
offices for choice to those who had grown up at his own Court
" because they are moved to accept the provinces entrusted to
them by their zeal for our imperial honour. " Everything now
hung on the utter trustworthiness, the personal loyalty and the
blind obedience of the officials, since the Church by releasing
all subjects from their allegiance to the Emperor invited them
to disloyalty, and, indeed, rewarded it by benefits in this world
and the next.
Thus all the familiar names suddenly reappear in the Italian
administration, the young Sicilians, for the most part highly-
gifted : the Filangieri and Eboli, Acquaviva and Aquino,
Morra and Caraccioli. Besides these the Emperor's sons ;
Enzio and Frederick of Antioch, the little known Richard of
Theate and later King Henry, son of Isabella of England;
further, his sons-in-law, the husbands of his natural daughters :
Eccelino of Romano, Lord of the March of Treviso, and Jacob
of Caretto, Margrave of Savona, Richard Caserta, and Thomas
of Aquino the Younger. Finally, Manfred's relations by mar
riage, the Margrave Galvano and Manfred Lancia and Count
Thomas of Savoy. Italians of loyal families or from loyal
towns were also sometimes employed, chiefly as podestas but
sometimes in other offices ; very rarely as Vicars General.
Apart from Italian relatives of the Emperor the only ones so
honoured were Percival Doria, already mentioned amongst the
poets, and the wild Margrave Hubert Pallavicini who, with
Eccelino, later became the first of the great Italian Signers in
the Renaissance sense.
A contemporary styled the imperial Vicars General
" princes," principes, and this described the demeanour of
these petty despots who called themselves " By the Grace of
God and of the Emperor, Vicar General of Upper Pavia," or
merely " By the Grace of God Vicar General of Tuscany."
Their dependence on the Emperor was absolute, but in every
other way their position was one of unlimited princely power,
especially in the later days when the Vicars General were almost
IMPERIAL PRINCES 493
exclusively imperial Princes, sons-in-law and near relatives of
Frederick II. These became, especially Eccelino and Palla-
vicini, who grew daily more and more independent, the very
" mirror " of their imperial master down to the minutest
external traits. They aped his love of luxury, of astrologers
and menageries and Saracen satellites, even his intellectual
activities and his flippant jests about Church dogma. The
podestas of the great towns such as Florence, Pisa, Verona and
Cremona, trod closely on their heels. In other circumstances
these imperial representatives would probably have ruled as
kings over vassal monarchies like the Napoleon relatives. It
was characteristic of this intensive rather than extensive state
that wide kingdoms were compressed into small vicariates, or,
rather, that these minute vicariates ruled by the sons of an
Emperor should swell to the importance of duchies and of
kingdoms. In this connection a remarkable scheme of the
Emperor's must be treated of later.
Meanwhile the historical importance of this last and greatest
Germanic state foundation is to a certain extent already mani
fest, a state founded on Italian soil, founded, moreover, by the
last Emperor of the Romans, with whom the old Imperium
ceased to be. For these imperial Vicars General and these
imperial podes ta$, these representatives and vicegerents are the
direct ancestors of the Signers and Tyrants of the Renaissance.
The office of podesta with its unlimited despotic power,
especially when it became a life appointment, gradually came
to equal the position of a prince. The great Signers of Italy,
imitating the early Vicars General Eccelino and Hubert
Pallavicini, for centuries styled themselves " Vicars " of the
Emperor, until, about 1400, the German Emperors created
Dukedoms of the Vicariates of the Visconti, the Este, the
Gonzaga, etc. Let us grasp the full significance of Frederick's
Italian-Roman State : a mighty pan-Italian Seignory, which
for a short time united in one State Germanic, Roman and
Oriental elements, Frederick himself, Emperor of the World,
being the Grand Signor, or Grand Tyrant thereof, the first and
last of these princes to wear the diadem of Rome, whose Caesar-
hood was not only allied with German kingship like Barba-
rossa's but with Oriental-Sicilian despotism.
494 FREDERICK AND THE RENAISSANCE vn
Having grasped this we perceive that all the tyrants of the
Renaissance, the Scala and Montefeltre, the Visconti, Borgia
and Medici are down to the tiniest features the sons and
successors of Frederick II, the diadochi of this " Second
Alexander." A mendicant monk tells of a wonderful nut-tree
which sprang from the altar of a ruined church in Apulia, and
which, when they felled it, showed the countenance of the
Saviour in the cross section, which recurred in every section
of every branch even when the tree was hewn into a thousand
fragments. When the imperial autocrat was dead, and the
Grand Seignory of Italy was shivered to fragments, a similar
phenomenon occurred. Each of the princely courts bore the
image of Frederick's court ; and all the princely sons which
" Ausonia's sacred soil " bore in succeeding centuries, reflected,
as noble or ignoble bastards, the countenance of their great
unknown ancestor : Frederick II, this German Emperor by
whom the " Maid Italia, Lady of Brothels " (Dante), had once
been seized and overborne and got with child.
The despotism which Frederick II and his officials exercised
in Italy, though often arbitrary in its severity, was, by no means
in principle exotic in Italy. The constitution of the towns had
clearly shown a leaning towards dictatorship. Up till the turn
of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries the towns had been ruled
by two consuls. These were either subordinated to, or super
seded by, a radically foreign importation, the podesta, whose
functions resembled more and more those of a dictator. The
Lombards' conception of " freedom " will have been an indi
vidualistic striving for independence which tilted against any
authority imposed from outside, but did not resent the stern
ness of its own chosen authorities. Hence it came that the
individualism was able to mate so kindly with despotism.
Frederick fought against the separatist impulse : he and his
officials pointed the path to despotism. In many respects the
Emperor brought the towns exactly what they themselves
wanted, and the individualist spirit was thus for a while over
come. The towns who supported Milan were drawn together
by the bond that united them against their great foe ; the others
MESSIAH-EMPEROR 495
were unified by the Imperium and the hope of the general peace
which might be expected from the Emperor's powerful rule.
Frederick II hit the nail on the head when he wrote at this
time : " The Italian towns would be unmindful of their own
advantage if they preferred the luxury of an uncertain freedom
to the repose of Pax et Justitia." For many men were heartily
sick of this " uncertain freedom " which continually involved
them in internal and external wars, and they longed for
such order as the Emperor promised. The speculative and
mystical hopes of the time, the faith in the saving mission of
the Imperium Romanum and of its Emperor went out to
Frederick from another side. He had exploited this faith
years before. When he was embarking on the " Execution of
Justice " in Lombardy, Piero della Vigna heralded his coming
with the Scripture words : <c The people that walked in darkness
have seen a great light. . . ." This was, however, only the
prelude. When the Pope, with his excommunication and his
encyclicals, threatened to shake men's belief in the Emperor's
mission Frederick began seriously to work up these little-used
forces and was able with their help partially to paralyse the full
potency of the ban. He succeeded in fanning to a blaze the
enthusiasm for the long-promised Messiah-Emperor, but only
because the highest spiritual authority, Pope Gregory IX him
self, had been at pains to surround the Emperor with the
atmosphere of the Apocalypse.
If the time had not already been steeped in the belief that
the Day of Judgment was at hand this last frenzied battle
between the two leaders of the Christian world, fought out at
first in pamphlets and manifestos of unprecedented savagery,
might well have begotten the idea that an era was expiring in
delirium. For ten years the Christian peoples were bewildered
by the thunder-laden accusations launched by both parties,
each proclaiming to the listening monarchs and their peoples
that he was the highest authority alike in secular and spiritual
spheres : that the Destroyer himself was seated on — as the case
might be — the papal or the imperial throne.
496 SATIRES ON CHURCH vn
Not many days after Pope Gregory IX had with his excom
munication " committed the Emperor's body to Satan, that his
soul might at the Last Day be saved alive/' Frederick II opened
the spiritual battle by a great manifesto to all the kings and
princes of the earth : " Lift up your eyes, prick up your ears,
O ye children of men ! Mourn for the woe of the world, the
discord of peoples, the exile of justice, since the abomination
of Babylon goeth forth from the elders of the people who had
the appearance of guiding them, but into wormwood they
turned the fruits of justice, and righteousness into gall. Take
your seats, O ye princes, and hearken unto our cause, O ye
peoples!" Thus Frederick's document began, in which he
expounded in detail his conduct towards the Pope during the
whole course of his reign. At the same time he exposed Pope
Gregory's behaviour to detailed criticism. Since the day when
he mounted the chair of St. Peter this Pope had, from unknown
motives, relentlessly persecuted the Emperor and shown him
self an implacable foe. Frederick here laid the foundation of
all his attacks on Gregory IX. He was challenging neither
Papacy nor Church, but denouncing solely the present Pope,
whom he could not acknowledge as his judge, since Gregory,
by leaguing himself with the Empire's enemies, had become a
deadly foe. Finally, Frederick proclaimed to the world certain
details of Gregory's procedure as Pope and revealed certain
abuses of the Curia.
In so doing Frederick catered for a prevailing mood. The
materialism of the spiritual power had long been abhorrent to
the best minds, and to ordinary men the Curia's insatiable
thirst for money was burdensome. Public opinion was ready
enough to find in the Emperor's words confirmation of all that
songs and satires, parodies and pamphlets had long since openly
betrayed. This vigorous century had seen a multitude of
squibs and skits on Pope, Cardinals and Curia, parodying
hymns and litanies and masses, and pillorying above all the
greed of the Church and of her head. Witty bogus gospels
were broadcast in which the rdle of St. Mark is taken by the
silver mark, in others the cardinal becomes the carpinal (the
" snatcher "), and money reigns as king of kings. The secret
of the papal entente with usurers who were counted heretics
ATTACK ON GREGORY 497
was common knowledge. Speaking at the Council *of Lyons
Frederick's ambassador warded off an attack on his master as
a heretic by retorting that it was not the Emperor who tolerated
usurers in his dominions. The western powers were deeply
embittered by the papal demands for money. England, in
particular, resented the payment of tribute, and ceaselessly
protested against the plague of papal money-hunters,
This critical attitude towards the Roman Church and its
abuses had first found voice in the threatening words of Abbot
Joachim at the beginning of the century, and criticism had
been quickened by contrast with the frugal life of St. Francis.
Frederick II now seized on it and exploited it, not in an attack
against Church or Curia or Papacy, but solely against the
person of Pope Gregory IX, from whom he strove to detach
cardinals and Curia. He accused Gregory of issuing dispen
sations without the concurrence of the cardinals but in exchange
for money. Like a huckster who acts as his own clerk and sets
his own seal, and mayhap is also his own paymaster, Gregory
sits in his closet, binding and loosing. Frederick added some
specific examples of the unworthiness of the present Bishop of
Rome. The same line was taken by a pamphlet that emanated
from Frederick's circle which attacked Pope Gregory sharply
and with effect. " Thou who as Shepherd of the Sheep
preachest poverty according to the commands of Christ,
why dost thou so diligently flee the poverty that thou com-
mendest . . . ? " Frederick IFs most serious accusation
against Pope Gregory was his alliance with the Lombard
heretics, more especially the Milanese. The Pope himself had
accused them of heresy, and responsible spirituaj authorities
had judged that the town was mainly inhabited by heretics.
By making common cause with Milan Pope Gregory had
forfeited all claim to be worthy of the priesthood.
The Emperor felt moved by anxiety lest " the flocks of the
Lord by such a shepherd be led astray." He, therefore, urges
the cardinals to summon a General Council composed of the
clergy of the whole Christian world, not excepting the secular
princes. Let this Synod then judge both Pope and Emperor.
This proposal seemed monstrous, for since the days of Gregory
VII the Church Councils had ceased to be above the Pope and
498 WAR OF THE PEN vn
had become his instruments. Frederick II reiterates that he
is fighting only against the person of this Gregory. " The
Church in general and the Christian people must not marvel
that we fear not the verdict of such a judge : not that we lack
reverence for the papal office nor for the apostolic dignity, to
which all orthodox believers do homage and we in particular
above them all, ... but we accuse the degeneracy of this one
person who hath manifested himself to be unworthy of a throne
so illustrious." Frederick II thus scrupulously distinguished
between the papal office and its present incumbent : a refine
ment which his contemporaries noted and felt to be extremely
skilful. For the Emperor thus avoided a quarrel with the
Church and her institutions and prosecuted his campaign solely
against a personal enemy. And Gregory had displayed enmity
enough by the alliance with Venice, Genoa and Milan. On
the other hand, this discrimination of office and incumbent
brought Frederick into conflict with the dogmas of the Church,
which taught that the sacramental virtue was independent of
the personal worthiness or unworthiness of the priest. This
gave Pope Gregory his opportunity.
The imperial manifesto had been forceful. In comparison,
however, with Pope Gregory's answer the Emperor's most
savage outbursts appeared tame. Gregory piled up all the
most terror-fraught images of the Apocalypse against " this
scorpion spewing passion from the sting of his tail/' against
this dragon, this hammer of the world. The opening words
of his frenzied encyclical were calculated to awaken horror at
this apocalyptic monster, already Satan's prey : " Out of the
sea rises up the Beast, full of the names of blasphemy who,
raging with the claws of the bear and the mouth of the lion and
the limbs and likeness of the leopard, opens its mouth to
blaspheme the Holy Name and ceases not to hurl its spears
against the tabernacle of God and against the saints who dwell
in heaven. With fangs and claws of iron it seeks to destroy
everything and to trample the world to fragments beneath its
feet. It has already prepared its rams to batter down the walls
of the catholic faith. . . . Cease ye therefore to marvel that it
aims at us the darts of calumny, since the Lord himself it doth
not spare. Cease ye to marvel that it draws the dagger of
SAVAGE ENCYCLICAL 499
contumely against us, since it lifts itself to wipe from the earth
the name of the Lord. Rather, that ye may with open truth
withstand his lying and may refute his deceits with the proofs
of purity : behold the head and tail and body of the Beast, of
this Frederick, this so-called Emperor. . . ."
The Pope called uncanny forces to his aid in this warfare
against the Emperor. Distorting every fact with magnificent
effrontery he accused him of crime after crime, careless of
everything save the effect he hoped to produce on the minds
of Christian people. Frederick had intentionally doomed to
death the crusaders in the pilgrim camp of Brindisi, had
poisoned the Margrave of Thuringia, had made peace with the
Sultan in the Holy Land to the detriment of the Christians,
had in his own absence directed the war against the peace-
loving Pope, while for greed he allowed his own kingdom to be
wasted by fire and sword. Pope Gregory met with humility
the reproaches directed against his person and his conduct:
" Freely we confess our lack of merit and that we are all un
worthy to be the Vicar of Christ. We acknowledge our im
potence in face of such a burden which the nature of man, save
with divine assistance, is unable to sustain." Nevertheless, so
far as human fragility permits, he has conducted his office in
singleness of heart and according to the command of God.
Far otherwise Frederick II, continues Pope Gregory, doomed
to perdition he, with his craftiness and wiles, who has sought
to add the functions of the priest to those of the prince, who
rejoices to be called the Forerunner of Antichrist and blas
phemously denies the Church's power to bind and to loose.
Frederick in his own writings had brought the darkness into
light, and with his own hand has torn the veil from his own
hideousness. " For while he obstinately declares that he can
not be bound by the fetters of our ban who are the vicegerent
of Christ, therewith he declares that the Church does not
possess the power transmitted by the Holy Peter and his fol
lowers to bind and to loose . . . thus he sets the seal on his own
heresy and thereby shows how evilly he thinks of the other
clauses of the true faith. . . ." Having thus, out of his own
mouth, convicted the Emperor of heresy, Pope Gregory hurls
against him the most terrible of all accusations : " This King
Soo DENUNCIATIONS vn
of the Pestilence has proclaimed that — to use his own words —
all the world has been deceived by three deceivers, Jesus Christ,
Moses and Muhammad, of whom two died in honour, but
Christ upon the Cross, And further, he has proclaimed aloud
(or rather he has lyingly declared) that all be fools who believe
that God could be born of a Virgin, God who is the creator of
Nature and of all beside. This heresy Frederick has aggra
vated by the mad assertion that no one can be born save where
the intercourse of man and wife have preceded the conception,
and Frederick maintains that no man should believe aught but
what may be proved by the power and reason of , nature."
Pope Gregory had saved up his deadliest weapon for the last,
for behind this monstrous blasphemy could be discerned, how
ever distorted and disguised, the radiant features of the man
who sought to see in Nature " the things that are, as they are."
On this point there was no doubt. There is no hope of proving
whether or no Frederick had made the infamous statement
about the three deceivers. He was certainly capable of saying
that — and worse. . . . The phrase would not, in any case, be
his own invention. A generation earlier a Paris doctor of
theology, Simon of Tournai, had propounded the thesis in
order to prove his dialectic skill in its disproof. The Popes
never again laid this blasphemy to Frederick's charge, and even
Pope Gregory never renewed the charge when once the poison
had done its work and the accusation had been taken up by all
the world. Little did Gregory reck whether it was false or
true. The assumption that Frederick's friendship with the
Muslims would have restrained him from any blasphemy
against Muhammad will not hold water, though his contem
poraries distrusted the papal statements on this ground. How
could Frederick, they asked, have framed Muhammad as a
deceiver along with Moses and with Christ when the same Pope
Gregory had based his first excommunication of the same
Emperor on the accusation that he was a servant of Muhammad,
and addicted to Saracen, no longer to Christian, customs ?
Pope Gregory could not, of course, prove his statement. But
Frederick was equally unable to refute it, and he must, therefore,
seek by some other means to neutralise the effect of the papal
document that painted him as Satan and as Antichrist. He
LETTER FROM GERMANY 501
repudiated the speech about the three deceivers. Such a phrase
had never crossed his lips. A mere denial, however, proved
nothing, and even a solemn profession of the true faith carried
little weight. The most effective course was to cast doubt on
the Pope's veracity and to turn against him the most deadly
accusation of all : that of heresy.
The Emperor had little difficulty in presenting Pope Gregory
as the real heretic and the friend of heretics. The Pope's
alliance with the Lombards was known to all the world
and lent weight to the charge. The spiritual princes of
Germany, who still to a man stood firm behind the Emperor,
wrote soon after this to Pope Gregory. They had examined
all the reasons for the excommunication, and with all respect
they begged to counsel the Pope not further to embitter so true
a son of the Church as this Emperor. For such vexation would
add new dangers to those already seriously threatening the
catholic faith. Moreover, the Pope's attitude lent colour to
the general belief that the Pope's severity towards the Emperor
was prompted by a desire to protect the Milanese, these enemies
of the Empire, and their following. Little as they themselves
could credit that the " Vicar of the Truth " could be abetting the
manifest baseness of recalcitrant rebels, yet appearances were
against him, for the papal legate in Lombardy was doing his
utmost to entice the towns from the allegiance they owed the
Emperor. They openly stated, therefore, that they, who as
limbs of the Empire must not fail her, would be reluctantly
compelled to mourn for the Church. For the Emperor truth
fully contended that he had offered himself and all he possessed
to the Church, and they, therefore, begged the Pope to make
peace without delay. They were ready themselves to act as
intermediaries.
Frederick II was still, in the eyes of all the world, primarily
the liberator of the Holy Sepulchre, who had, in fact, sacrificed
himself and his wealth for the good of the Church. As a
persecutor of heretics, too, he had shown himself an orthodox
prince. It was, therefore, not easy to shake his position or men's
faith in him. " We know " — they wrote in England — " that
5o2 POPE'S JEALOUSY vn
he faithfully set out to war for our Lord Jesus Christ, and ex
posed himself to the perils of the sea and of the fight. We
have not up to now observed an equal piety in the Pope."
Frederick II must still be accounted innocent and unconvicted
in England. Moreover, they said, an enemy's word is in no
wise to be trusted, and all know that Pope Gregory is the deadly
enemy of the Emperor. That the Pope dared to protect im
perial rebels and heretics from the punishment justly due, and
even excommunicated the victorious and fortunate* Emperor
solely for their sakes, is sufficiently remarkable.
Frederick II expressly returned to this point, that he himself
had only been the fortunate instrument of the divine will :
" In truth, however, the Emperor's good fortune has always
awakened the hostile envy of the Pope, When Simonides was
asked how it was that none were jealous of him he answered,
' because I have never successfully accomplished anything.'
But because by God's grace all has prospered with us and we
are pursuing the Lombards our rebels to the death, this apos
tolic Priest who wishes them to live, heaves a sigh and seeks
himself to obstruct our good fortune." By thus representing
the Pope as envious of others' good fortune and a disturber of
the world's peace Frederick appeared as the champion of the
oppressed Church.
To illustrate the confusion which the Pope was causing
Frederick had recourse to the doctrine of the two luminaries,
the familiar parable of the Sun and the Moon, which were
typified on earth by Papacy and Empire. Both were directly
appointed by God so that man who is always drawn hither and
thither might be bridled by a double rein — both, however,
were independently created so that neither should disturb the
other in his orbit. As the Sun and Moon exist in heaven side
by side, so on earth the Papacy and the Empire. Frederick
made no attempt to assert imperial superiority over the priest ;
he contentedly equates the Empire to the Moon :
" But, O marvel of unheard-of arrogance ! The Sun would
fain steal from the Moon her colour and rob her of her light !
The priest would bait Augustus, and with his apostolic great
ness would obscure the radiance of our majesty whom God
has set upon the pinnacles of Empire ! " Thus the Pope has
POPE'S HERESY 503
brought confusion into the world : instead of loving the peace
which the Emperor seeks, Peter becomes a rock of offence and
Paul turns again into Saul and corrupts the world. " And
there he sits in the seat of the Pharisees and of false doctrines,
anointed by his comrades with the oil of evil unrighteousness,
the Roman priest of our day. Insolently he tries to stultify the
order of things decreed by heaven, and perchance believes that
the laws of nature will be governed by his heated will. He
seeks to darken the radiance of our majesty by perverting truth
to lies. . . . He, who is the Pope in name alone, has said that
we are the Beast who rises from the sea full of the names of
blasphemy and spotted like the pard. And we maintain that
he is the monster whereof it is written : another horse rose from
the sea, a red horse, and he who sat thereon stole peace from
the earth, so that the living slaughtered one another." The
Pope himself was the great dragon. The Pope himself was
Antichrist, whose forerunner he had called the Emperor, a
prince among the princes of darkness, who abused the gifts of
the prophets, a false vicegerent of Christ who transformed his
priesthood into a beasthood.
Thus Frederick stamped the Pope as a heretic. A heretical
Pope was a much more revolutionary thought than a heretical
Emperor. This new insight suddenly metamorphoses all the
relationships in the world. For without more ado the " true
believer " is the friend of the Emperor, and the " infidel " is
like the Lombard heretics, a follower and comrade of the Pope.
The Pope can no longer protect the Church. It is the Emperor
who upholds his credit as her God-appointed protector, since
the High Priest " acts against the faith, the false vicar of him
who though he was cursed yet answered not again." It is the
Pope who brings discord into the world and snatches peace
away which it was the Empire's mission of salvation to bring.
The cardinals as Roman Senators will no longer find it their
duty to help the Pope but will be helpers of the protecting,
rescuing Emperor. They will even have to act as opposing
forces " as the planets circle in opposite directions to temper
the speed of the firmament." The Emperor writes to the
cardinals, " Call ye back our roaring lion from his purpose,
the beginning of which was abhorred." In similar strain to the
504 APPEAL TO KINGS vn
kings of Europe : they also as defenders of the true faith should
rise as one man for the sake of the world's peace against this
Pope and stand shoulder to shoulder with the Emperor. u Ye
princes, ye beloved princes, reproach not us alone, reproach
also the Church which is the community of the faithful : for
her head is weak, the leader in her midst is as a roaring lion,
her prophet is a madman, her bridegroom an infidel, her priest
a defiler of the Most High, who acts unrightepusly and con
temns the law. In the sight of the other princes of the world
we must mourn as is due the failure of such an High Priest,
we who enjoy honour and bear burdens and who in space are
as it were nearer to him and in office more akin." The fact
that Pope Gregory had protected the Empire's rebels should
also be a warning to them : " Urgently and without ceasing,
we exhort you, Beloved, to see in this outrage to us an injustice
likewise to yourselves. Haste ye to your houses with water
when the fire flames in the house of your neighbour ! " There
was no ordinance of the Church, no word of Scripture, no
legend from which Frederick failed to draw new strength, seeing
everything from new standpoints, tillj finally, the Donation
of Constantine itself was turned to account for the Empire's
behoof. This dangerous document was a monument of the
gratitude which was owed to the Empire by the Papacy.
It has often been remarked that in this duel of the Chanceries
the genuinely productive side was the Emperor's. The Curia
exhausted itself in biblical turns of thought and speech that
had been worn threadbare for centuries, while the manifestos
of the Emperor sparkled with new ideas, some of which ripened
after centuries. One reason was, that whereas Pope Gregory
was solely negative and destructive, aiming at the annihilation
of his foe, Frederick had a constructive aim. Without so
expressing it, Frederick countered each negation of the Pope's
by pointing to himself, the Emperor of Justitia, the Rescuer,
the Bringer of Salvation in a day of chaos. Frederick II, whose
very name spelt a gospel of peace,1 might well seem by his deeds
as by his power the long-awaited Prince of Peace : he who had
worn the royal crown of David in Jerusalem, he to whom men
had long applied promise and prophecy — as they had not to
1The Germanic root *fride~peace and *rik=r«/<?. — Tr.
PILATE S°S
Pope Gregory. Men looked for a messianic Pope as they
looked for a messianic Emperor, but he would come in the
guise of Peter the Fisherman, or the simple beggar Francis, the
Bridegroom of Poverty, not as an Emperor-Priest like Gregory
or Innocent.
What Frederick had only indicated was explicitly claimed
by a pamphlet which represented the Emperor as the
Saviour. " The High Priests and Pharisees assembled a
Council and came together against the prince and Imperator
of the Romans, * What shall we do/ said they, * since this man
thus triumphs over his enemies ? If we do not prevent him
he will overthrow the whole fame of Lombardy, and coming
like a Caesar he will not stay till he have driven us from out
our land and have exterminated our people. . . .' " Thus the
pamphlet opened, verbally recalling the words of scripture
where the High Priests and Pharisees decide on the Saviour's
condemnation. The parallel is pushed far : the Pope is com
pared to Pilate because what he has written he has written, and
is reproached with his breach of the peace since he " as a friend
of discord . . . against the honour and the right of the Roman
prince protects heretics who are the enemies of God and of all
believing Christians/' As for the Pope's pious pretext : his
protection of the Lombards is to serve the cause of the Holy
Land. This is scornfully turned against Gregory himself.
His ban has so sorely damaged the cause of the Holy Land that
Jerusalem might well fall again a prey to the infidel : "And
thou, the vicegerent of Christ sleepest the while and carest
naught that our inheritance has passed to others ! For the
city which once was full of people and beautiful among cities
lieth waste . . . she who was wont to flow with milk and honey
floweth now with the waters of bitterness. " The guilt lies with
the Pope. Jerusalem, the city of Christ, uncomforted by the
Pope, is awaiting another Lord, " Without ceasing she waits for
him, the Roman prince, the comforter of her captivity, the
redeemer of her destruction. But thou on the other hand, thou
foe, thou Godless Herod, thou fearest to go thither . . . thou
stone of stumbling, thou rock of offence, thou hast thrown into
confusion the ways by sea and land that this Caesar, this won
drous light of the World, this mirror without flaw, might be
506 HAMMER OF THE WORLD vn
unable to hasten after the manner of the Caesars to the help
of the land of God." Let the Pope, concludes the pamphlet,
receive the Emperor again, the " true born son/' once more
into the bosom of the Church, cc for otherwise our great-hearted
lion which now feigneth sleep, will with his dread roaring draw
unto himself the fatted kine from all the furthest corners of the
earth, tearing out and breaking asunder the horns of the proud.
He shall establish justice and bring the Church into the right
way."
Visions of the Last Day are thus associated with Frederick.
His figure was destined to live on in myth through the centuries
as this pamphlet pictures him, in the saga of the messianic
Emperor, in his mountain fastness, who will one day return,
establish the reign of Justice, castigate the Church and lead the
people of Christ into Jerusalem. Herein lay something positive,
above and beyond accusations against the Pope. While the
Emperor's partisans saw in Gregory the High Priest and the
Pharisee, the Pilate who condemned the Christ, the Emperor
stood before them as the true Redeemer, promised by the Sibyls,
praise-deserving, " the wondrous light of the world, the mirror
without flaw," the Saviour chosen by God to renew the peace
and order of the world. The more he felt compelled to deny
the worth of this individual Pope the more insistently the
Emperor pointed to the sacred and exalted mission of his own
Empire and the sanctity of his own Caesar-majesty.
Frederick found the r61e easy to sustain. Not only his friends
and adherents but many of the orthodox recognised in him the
long-awaited messenger of God who had come to chastise a
corrupt priesthood. They trembled before the face of this
" Hammer of the World," but well they knew from the sayings
of the prophets that a MAN was needed who should smite with
iron fist both papacy and priesthood, to lead the world again
into the state of peace and of salvation which had blessed man
kind in the reign of Augustus when Christ himself had walked
the earth. In the mystic circles of the Franciscans, amongst
whom Abbot Joachim's teachings were still alive, these fears
and hopes were centred more and more in the person of the
MYSTIC IMAGININGS 507
Hohenstaufen Emperor who as the Pope's bitter foe threatened
to fulfil the prophecies. In these Franciscan convents,
which in apostolic purity were awaiting the reform of the
Church, the belief soon found credence (in spite of their
hostility to the Emperor) that Frederick II was in very deed
the herald of the End, and that no man, but only God himself,
could remove or slay God's messenger. ... In Frederick's
circle the legend later grew that God's own hand had shaped
him.
The most various dreamings were here blended : the Church
visions which dreamed of a Scourge of the peoples which should
restore the primitive Church of apostolic times ; the im
perial visions which dreamed of the revival of the Augustan
Empire under a new Caesar Augustus ; and, lastly, the more
human cravings which dreamed of a return to the primitive
innocence of man before the Fall under the rule of a Justitia
Emperor. These mystic dreams flourished in more and more
riotous luxuriance, and year by year Frederick II became more
and more the centre of the hopes of every camp. Judge of the
World, Justitia Emperor, Redeemer of the Holy Sepulchre and
Messianic Prince of Peace, all blent into the figure of Caesar
Augustus who himself expressed the ideal of a rex Justus.
By the minting of his Augustales Frederick II had already
shown that his Caesar gestures had a deeper significance than
the merely persdnal or political. The more he resembled the
Roman Caesars and Augusti in triumph and word and deed
the greater grew his similitude to the Saviour Vergil had fore
told, with whom Roman Empire and Christian epoch were to
begin : and end. Seeds of the Renaissance lurk in this eschato-
logical faith : the Rebirth of the World both by the cosmic
rebirth of the natural man and by the return to the origins of
Church and Empire. Even for Dante these, however, lay in
Roman antiquity in the time of the apostles and the golden
age of Rome.
From all the inextricable confusion of vague, mysterious,
terrifying or idyllic visions of the time Frederick II had hitherto
seized only on those features which could be baldly and clearly
represented in the State : first, the establishment of his imperial
world-redeeming Justitia in all his domains, even in Italy, and
5o8 RULER OF THE FAITHFUL vir
then the demeanour of a Roman Caesar Augustus, both of
which things were without ulterior motive, instinctive in his
blood, inherent in his office. The interpretation was left
mainly to others. Now all was changed. The Pope made
inevitable that religious speculations should play a part in his
life. If Frederick was to take the field against the Pope as the
Saviour of the Church, it was not enough to oppose the Reason
of the State to the Faith of the Church. Frederick II must win
for himself the transfiguring halo of God's messenger which
must surround the head of a Ruler of th£ Faithful, Unex
plored mysteries lay to the hand both of Empire and Papacy.
Caesar could look for his divine nimbus to the great peace
movement of these days of crisis with their expectation of a
Messiah-Emperor, days filled with peace-services, hallelujahs
and flagellation. . . . The great movement bore Frederick on
its crest. He made himself its hero and became its God. So
it was said that the French took the Revolution for their
religion, and for their God, Napoleon.
When Frederick left Lombardy at the beginning of 1239
he had months of intensive activity behind him. The more
manifold the tasks, the more comprehensive the demands, the
swifter the progress of events, the better it suited the Emperor's
mood and the more certain was his success. Frederick had
fought the rebels in the Romagna and in Lombardy ; from his
camp before Piacenza and Milan had issued the orders that
transformed Sicily into a fortress ; from Lodi had radically
recast the Sicilian constitution and set in motion the most
elaborate shipping transactions ; had sent orders to outlaw
these, hang those, exile others, and deprive yet others of their
goods. With it all he had kept leisure enough to make daily
minute enquiry about the game, the baiting of cranes, the
breeding of horses, the destruction of vermin, to occupy him
self with horses, hawks and hounds, to draft and superintend
drawings for one of the most beautiful and luxurious castles
of the Middle Ages, for the first Renaissance gateway, for a
triumphal arch whose detached figures mark the beginnings
BROTHER ELIAS 509
of secular plastic art. He has not lost the taste for costly
purchases: a dish of onyx, curios, precious stones. He
sends antique statues home to his Sicilian castles by porter : he
issues instructions for the University of Naples. Within a few
months his Italian Seignory stands as a monument of creative
genius and of organising skill, and he is able to write to a
friendly prince that he is rejoicing in the best of health, every
thing is succeeding just as he wishes and he is now planning
something new. This new project was the resolve, after the
many challenging pamphlets, to assume the offensive against
the Pope and to invade the States of the Church.
Commg from Lombardy the Emperor marched by way of
Parma and crossed the Tuscan Alps by the La Cisa Pass. Here
he was joined, it is said, by the Minister General of the Fran
ciscan order, Brother Elias of Cortona, to the further confusion
of parties. This was a clear proof of the change in relationships
that had taken place, and the first indication of that secret
sympathy which united the Franciscans and the Ghibellines,
and which is so strongly characteristic of Dante and the first
century of the Renaissance. Brother Elias had been one of the
earliest and most intimate disciples of St. Francis, who had
named him as his successor. His stern piety was entirely free
from weakness or sentimentality. He was not strictly a mendi
cant friar in the original meaning of the term, rather : a states
man, prince and scholar, with a touch of genius leavening his
haughtiness and love of pomp. The general held somewhat
aloof from the brethren and rarely ate with them. He took his
meals in his private room, and that not only because he relished
better fare than the brothers were accustomed to. He lived
either in his handsome house in Cortona or in the papal palace
at Assisi, for he was an intimate friend of Gregory IX. He was
never seen save on horseback, even though he had only a few
steps to go, and then escorted by a handsomely-dressed page.
Like a true autocrat he repudiated the suggestion that such
magnificence was contrary to the Rule of the Order : the
Minister General was above the Rule. As befitted a spiritual
noble, Brother Elias was a great builder, and the magnificent
Lower Church in Assisi which he erected to his Master was -his
work. He was said to have got the money for this through his
Sio WELCOME RECRUIT vn
knowledge of alchemy, about which he had written a treatise.
If this had been the case it might have silenced the religious
murmurings of many of the brothers, although the horror of
money was still vivid amongst them. But since, in fact, he
raised the money by provincial taxes on the Order itself they
began to grow restive under him. He was hated as a despot
and a tyrant : the brothers partly yearned for the simple free
dom of the early years, partly feared his harshness, for to their
great indignation Elias had appointed stern " visitors " to
stiffen the discipline of the order.
At this point they rebelled. The inclination of the Minister
General to consider only the worldly aims of the Order as a
State — a point of view akin to Gregory's — finally brought about
his fall. Delegates were sent from all the provinces to Pope
Gregory to compel Brother Elias 's removal from office. The
messenger from the Order's province of Saxony particularly
distinguished himself by excess of zeal. Brother Jordan, on
his arrival in Rome in a state of high excitement, contrived by
some means or other to force his way into the Pope's bedroom ;
he paid no heed to the command to leave the room, but joy
fully hastened to the bed and fetched out from under the
bedclothes the aged Gregory's naked foot to apply the necessary
kiss, remarking to his companion, " We have no sacred relics
like this in Saxony ! " Brother Jordan himself tells the tale.
This same brother must have taken part in the great assembly
held in the Spring of 1239 which removed Brother Elias from
the post of Minister General of the Brothers Minor, though
Pope Gregory strove to retain him.
The fall of the well-known Minister General of the Minor
ites naturally caused a stir throughout the world. What
amazement when Brother Elias, who after his deposition at
first remained in Assisi doing penance, suddenly appeared in
the train of the excommunicate Emperor ! The inevitable result
was to draw on him the papal ban. The Franciscan was for
Frederick a most welcome recruit. The Brother's intimate
knowledge of Gregory IX was invaluable,* and his presence
amongst Frederick's followers demonstrated to all that the
closest disciples of St. Francis were turning from the heretic
Pope. As a chronicler said : Frederick loosed those whom the
1239 INVASION OF PATRIMONIUM 511
Pope had bound, and sons of the Church became through the
papal behaviour the Church's step-children.
Under such auspices Frederick embarked on his new, perhaps
fantastic adventure. It began with a short stay in Pisa. Here
Frederick proclaimed himself the Peacemaker his name implied,
and succeeded in effecting a reconciliation between the wildly
warring Pisan parties of the Gherardeschi and the Visconti.
A remarkable scene followed. Christmas was at hand, and his
own birthday followed hard on that of the Saviour. To cele
brate the season, he, the excommunicate, whose mere presence
brought an interdict upon the town, not only caused a service
to be held and the mysteries of the mass consummated, but
himself mounted the cathedral pulpit on Christmas Day and
preached to the assembled people. He promised peace and
the reign of peace to the astonished worshippers. This sermon
brought down on him the papalists' accusations of blackest
blasphemy. A few days later he invaded the Pope's dominion
as the Prince of Peace.
King Enzio with some force had been sent on a few days
earlier into the papal provinces that had of old belonged to the
Empire : the March of Ancona and Spoleto. Frederick fol
lowing him will not have met with much resistance. Cardinal
John Colonna, whom the Pope had placed in charge of the
defence of these regions, was one of Frederick's most ardent
supporters, which increased the confusion. The Emperor thus
won once again one of his bloodless victories : his last. He
had contrived, as in the dramatic actions of his earlier years,
to make a masterly entry, so that the gates of towns and fort
resses sprang open as if by magic at his approach. He trod
the soil of the papal states as the Liberator, nay, the Saviour,
whom his own were awaiting in Jerusalem. Summonses ad
dressed under the sign of the Cross to the various communities
preceded the invading Caesar with his Saracen escort. These
appeals were designed to give the right tone to his arrival.
Never before had Frederick II so undisguisedly proclaimed
himself in the very words of the scripture as the Promised
One:
5i2 JESI AND BETHLEHEM vii
" Since the great and acceptable day is come which ye can
make yet more acceptable to us and to the Empire we beg of
you : Arise ! direct your eyes to see the wisdom and the might
of the Empire ! And know ye us, your prince and gracious
possessor ! Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths
straight 1 Take the bars from off your doors that your Caesar
may come, gracious unto you and unto rebels terrible, at whose
coming the evil spirits shall be silent which have so long op
pressed you." Similar were the words with which the Baptist
announced the coming of the Lord and promised that the
kingdom of heaven was at hand. It can only be the messenger
of God who silences the evil spirits : him especially " whom
men call the Pope." To another town he calls : " The moment
of your redemption for which we and you have yearned is
nigh ! " And the town's joining him he styles its " conversion."
Frederick's identification of himself with him whom the
kings of the east came to seek in Bethlehem appears more
unmistakably than elsewhere in the famous letter to his own
birthplace, Jesi : " The instincts of nature compel us to turn
to thee, O Jesi, and embrace thee with heartfelt affection, noble
town of the March, the place of our illustrious birth, where our
Divine Mother brought us into the world, where our radiant
cradle stood : that thy habitations may not fade from our
memory, that thou, our Bethlehem, birthplace of the Caesar,
may remain deep-rooted in our heart, Thou, 0 Bethlehem,
city of the March, art not the least among the cities of our race ;
for out of thee the Leader is come, the prince of the Roman
Empire, that he might rule thy people and protect thee and not
suffer that thou be in future subject to a foreign hand. Arise
then, 0 our first mother, shake thee free from the foreign yoke.
For we take pity on thy oppression and on the oppression of
the Faithful. ..." A more solemn cult of the birthplace could
hardly be conceived than this, couched in the words of Holy
Writ. The like had not been heard since Justinian had raised
his birthplace to be a bishop's see, second only to Rome alone.
Foligno is also honoured, " In whose radiance our childhood
began and which we revere as the home which nourished
us." The worship of his Bethlehem and the phrase " Divine
Mother," taken in conjunction with the legend that the nun
THE LIBERATOR 513
his mother had miraculously borne him, had a quite peculiar
significance.
On the Emperor's arrival in these regions the papal authority
instantly crumbled both in Spoleto and in the March of Ancona.
The towns, with few exceptions, opened their gates most gladly
to this Caesar who came " accompanied by Salvation." And
wherever the Liberator entered he was received with rejoicing,
for " one and all were right glad to find themselves under the
protection of a master's hand." Deep emotion and astonish
ment must have gripped the people of the Papal States at the
sight of the Emperor, especially those who were papalists
at heart. One of these reported this blasphemous inarch of
the Messiah : " He has the Cross borne before him, himself
the enemy of the Cross, while he paces through the land of the
accursed. In Foligno and in Gubbio he shamelessly presumes
to bless those whom the Church has cast forth, consecrating
them, so eyewitnesses assure me, with his godless right hand.
And in these and other regions in spite of the ban he has caused
masses to be said and has celebrated the other holy offices . . .
he, the forerunner of Antichrist."
Frederick II appears, in fact, to have halted in Foligno
in considerable state. The ambassadors of many towns and
many of his own nobles, amongst them Kong Enzio, were
assembled round him while he made a speech, and in accord
ance with his office restored peace between Gubbio and another
community. It is probably true enough about his blessing the
people. For a court was held in Foligno with all the elaborate
ceremonial which had been customary of late since Cortenuova,
and a firm and lasting peace proclaimed throughout the Empire,
The Emperor was enthroned in serene detachment above the
multitude, while like an officiating priest Piero della Vigna stood
by his side and communicated to the audience the oracle of the
imperial Godhead while the people bowed the knee before his
majesty. This type of ceremony was exotic in the west and
aroused redoubled stir and amazement in the Papal States,
especially since the Emperor's retinue included Mussulmans.
The re-occupation of the imperial provinces was one un-
5H AT GATES OF ROME vii
interrupted triumphal march. His success exceeded expecta
tion, and decided Frederick to push on into the Patrimonium
proper, papal Tuscany, " where on all sides the peoples* prayers
call for our presence and arrival," The same scenes are re
peated. The people of Tivoli, Orta, Sutri, the fortified Monte-
fiascone, and many other towns went over with banners flying
to the Emperor, at their head the most important of all : Viterbo .
By the middle of February the Emperor was installed in Viterbo
with his whole court and had been greeted with rejoicing. The
imperial plenipotentiaries whose duty it is to receive oaths of
allegiance can scarcely keep pace with their task, writes the
Emperor at this time.
More and more narrowly, more and more closely, Frederick
drew his circles round the centre of the Empire : suddenly
he stands before Rome. The road from Viterbo lies open
before him. Shall he now end his fantastic tour of victory
with the sack of Rome, take the Pope prisoner like any ordinary
enemy general — and make the Church the gift of another
martyr ? To Frederick this road was barred. Only as the
Caesar Augustus of prophecy, only without a blow as Prince
of Peace, could he enter the city of cities. This he planned to
do. " One deed is left to do : if the whole Roman people is in
our favour and greets our coming with rejoicing as it has begun
to do, then we should prepare joyfully to enter the city and
revive the ancient festivals and the triumphal laurels, to show
the victorious eagles honour due Then shall our contemners
feel belated shame, when they see us face to face, then they
shall fear him whom their loose lips roused to wrath."
The Roman populace was, in fact, well disposed. Roman
nobles had again got into touch with Frederick, who had him
self addressed new letters to the Romans full of reproaches.
Sunk in ignoble lethargy not one of the tribe of Romulus, not
one of the Quirites, not one of the many nobles, not one of
the ten thousands of the Roman people had dared to hinder the
Pope when this Roman priest in Rome itself pronounced the
ban against the Roman Emperor. That Emperor who derived
his name from their city had come once more to make the name
of Rome glorious again and famous as in the days of old.
Frederick called himself the benefactor and father of the
VENIAT IMPERATOR 515
Romans, and immediately responded to the request of Senate
and People to spare the conquered town of Sutri . His influence
in Rome was increasing and grew with his success.
The Emperor's partisans in Rome intrigued all the more
ardently against the Pope, whose position became from day
to day more untenable. All portents were against him, Far
from attacking Frederick in Sicily or repressing him in Lom-
bardy Pope Gregory was losing province after province of the
States of the Church left to him by his predecessors, and while
he warned his towns against the machinations of Antichrist he
saw town after town opening its gates to the Saviour. The
revolution which he himself had conjured up was not to be
stayed and was victorious all along the line. Not only the
Roman people turned their backs on the aged fanatic. His
cardinals were no longer to be trusted. The majority were
hostile. Some had already left him. By his passionate
obstinacy the old man had brought himself and the Church
to the verge of destruction. He stood alone. His cause
seemed lost.
Meanwhile the excitement in Rome was at its height. The
Emperor had left Viterbo and started on the march to Rome
by way of Sutri. Only one or two days' march separated him
from the city. The papalists spread the wildest rumours.
What did that avail ! The Antichrist, the Monster had sworn,
they cried, to turn St. Peter's into a stable and to make the
altar of the apostles a manger for his steeds, to cast the body of
his Lord to the dogs ... he was approaching with his wild
Saracens to overthrow the chair of St. Peter. With his new
rites he would outvie the " three impostors," revive the prac
tices of heathen times, would have himself installed as Pope or
even God in the holiest of holies ! None of these terrifying
suggestions carried weight. The Romans intoxicated them
selves with the " resounding words, the mighty gestures, the awe-
inspiring deeds " of their Caesar and Imperator, and shouted
for joy at the approach of the laurel-crowned Deliverer :
ECCE SALVATOR! ECCE IMPERATOR!
VENIAT VENIAT IMPERATOR!
The fate of the world was balanced on a knife's edge.
516 GREGORY'S VICTORY Vn
But Rome, " the harlot who offers herself for sale to any man
who draws near," as a contemporary chronicler phrases it, had
not been vainly depicted on the seals as a woman with a palm
branch in one hand and in the other a globe, reposing on a lion,
symbol of world rule which Pope or Emperor could exercise
only in her name. He was the victor who first won her favour.
Pope Gregory IX had waited long. Now in the hour of utmost
need he turned for help to the saints of Rome, the two apostles.
It was the festival of Peter's Chair. In spite of riot and unrest
the Pope ordered the usual ceremonies to be carried out : the
heads of the Princes of the Apostles, Paul and Peter, splinters
of the True Cross, and other relics of Christian Rome were
borne in solemn procession to St. Peter's. He himself, the
aged man — reputed to be a hundred — paced along shrouded
in incense amidst his prelates and the faithful cardinals. The
crowd greeted him with boisterous mockery. Pope Gregory,
however, at other times so hot-headed, preserved a royal calm.
He pointed to the heads of the apostles : " These are the anti
quities of Rome, for whose sake your city is venerated 1 This is
the Church, these are the relics, which it is your duty, Romans,
to protect ! I can do no more than one man may ; but I do
not flee, lo, here I await the mercy of the Lord ! " And taking
the tiara from his head he placed it protectively over the relics
of the saints. " Ye Holy Ones ! Protect ye Rome when the
Romans care for her no more ! " Whereupon the mocking
multitude broke into sobs, snatched from their garments the
imperial eagles, tokens of Antichrist, and replaced them by
the sign of the Cross, prepared to fight for their threatened
Church. Caesar in the purple of the Triumphator was for
gotten. Frederick II passed by the capital of the world, and
proceeded to his kingdom of Apulia.
VIII. DOMINUS MUNDI
Cult of the Emperor - The sacratissimum ministerium -
Outburst of Sicilian art - Capuan Gate - Nicholas of
St. Francis and " Gothic " painting - Diet in
Foggia, 1240 - Inefficacy of papal ban - Princes' effort
to mediate - Surrender of Ravenna - Resistance of
Faenza - Cost of prolonged operations - Issue of
leather coins - Hostilities against Venice - Gregory's
General Council - Frederick's counter-measures -
Gregory's pact with Genoa - Fall of Faenza, April 14,
1241 - Destruction of Benevento - Victory at sea, 1241;
capture of 100 prelates - Mongol threat - Battle of
Liegnitz, 1241 - Pope hinders Crusade - Muslims re
take Jerusalem, Nov. 1240 - Frederick negotiates reco
very of Jerusalem - Advance on Rome ; death of Pope
Gregory - Status of Empire in Europe - Relations
between Frederick and brother kings - Saint Louis -
Stirps caesarea - Deification of the Hohenstaufens
- Conclave of Terror, 1241 - Innocent IV elected
Pope - Defection of Viterbo - Treachery of Cardinal
Rainer - Provisional peace, 1244; breaks down -
Flight of Innocent IV - Lyons - Diet of Verona
- Rainer's hostile propaganda - Council of Lyons -
Thaddeus of Suessa - Deposition of Frederick II
VIII. DOMINUS MUNDI
" THO' we cannot everywhere be present in the flesh, yet our
restraining hand is felt even to the remotest frontiers of the
earth." This phrase of Frederick II's is characteristic, for
himself and for his sacrum imperium. All the while that he
was concentrating his Empire at the core in Italy, the land of
its origin, his invisible influences were potent in the world at
large and with mysterious power sucked the whole globe into
the vortex of his strife with Rome. His dash for the City
of Cities, whose possession would magically have assured his
world dominion, had unfortunately failed. What the upshot
would have been if he had succeeded none could guess. The
mere attempt had filled the world with sudden unrest : the
Emperor before the walls of Rome ; the Pope in direst need.
A sudden misgiving was felt : what unthinkable development
might be expected from this excommunicate Emperor whom
the Church cursed as Antichrist, but whose followers acclaimed
him as the Saviour and Messiah while they prepared his paths
before him ?
For the moment Pope Gregory had averted Fate, but the
whole of Christendom lived in continuous anxiety of what this
Emperor and the morrow might bring forth. The deafest
began to hear, the blindest to see and to perceive something
fateful in Frederick's mission. Prophetic verses quivering with
apocalyptic horror filled Europe with a shudder of uncertainty.
They reached Pope Gregory. Men said that Frederick was
the author. The world held its breath to catch the wing-beat
of those birds of fate which in the starry heavens should hover
round the Prince of the Last Days :
Fate is still as the night. There are portents and wars
In the course of the stars, and the birds in their flight,
I am Frederick, the Hammer, the Doom of the World.
Rome, tottering long since, to confusion is hurled,
Shall shiver to atoms and never again be Lord of the World.
5*9
520 CHRIST OR ANTICHRIST? vm
With what designs was Frederick credited who had uttered
dark threats against the Romans, " drunk with draughts from
the cup of Babylon I " " Your Babel shall be dissolved,
Damascus shall fall, the bellows shall be consumed with fire,
the throne erected towards midnight shall crash and the apron
hung about your loins shall rot in the zeal of our exalted glory
which the eye of God ceaseth not to illumine, which causeth
the ulcers of darkness to perish, and to which well-nigh the
whole universe doeth homage, "
Neither camp had failed to realise the epoch-making nature
of Frederick's mission : whether with rejoicing or with para
lysing fear people saw the power of the Divus Augustus ever
growing, saw the dizzy heights which he was scaling and the
abysses which were yawning at the Pope's feet. Friend and
foe alike believed that the wearer of the imperial diadem was
sent by God himself and was striding through the world for a
blessing or a curse to Christendom. None was insensitive to
the extraordinary something. For decades the world had been
busy seeking to interpret the imperial manifestation : was
Frederick, fulfilling the time as Tyrant and King to the con
fusion of the peoples, Antichrist himself ? — or was he the Prince
of Peace, the Saviour bringing in the reign of Justice ? The
world recognised only these two mythical possibilities for a
ruler of this stature. Every act and phrase of Frederick was
forced into one or other of these ready-made moulds. Every
event was interpreted as the fulfilment of a biblical or sibylline
prophecy pointing either to Christ or Antichrist. Even the
complimentary form of address which now became frequent,
DOMINUS MUNDI, was full of ambiguity, for Satan also was
" Lord of the World." According to taste, therefore, Frede
rick II was the Bringer of Absolute Good or of Absolute Evil.
In either case he was the "Expected One/' and this he re
mained for centuries in the faith of the peoples.
Since none even of his foes failed to appreciate the excep
tional character of Frederick's mission it is easy to understand
the veneration he evoked amongst the " Faithful." The
phrase of his own that concluded the threats against Rome :
" The earth obeyeth us and the sea doeth homage and all that
we desire cometh forthwith to pass " indicated the type of
CO-ADJUTOR OF GOD 521
tribute which was seemly. The resistance of Rome seemed
incomprehensible to Frederick's adherents. A long Greek
poem against the Romans written by the Chartophylax Georgios
of Gallipoli, runs : " Rome who of old had her Caesars and
her kings and her satraps and rendered glory for glory. . . .
Alas ! we must mourn that she has driven forth her Caesars,
the trebly-blessed . . . since Fate has plunged the best and
the mightiest Rule of One into an evil Rule of None . . . but
He the mighty trebly-fortunate Frederick, the Radiant, the
Wonder of the World, TO davjma rfc OLKOV^V^^ whose bow
is of brass, whose lightnings blind the foe ; earth is his servant
and the sea and the vault of heaven, the Just in fame, the
Exalted ... his voice thunders and the noise of his chariots . . .
his lightnings flame from on high annihilating the enemy's
arrogance. What trembling at such a campaign ! . . . Mur
mur, therefore, 0 Rome, wholesome words of divinely-inspired
determination . . . exalt him above every cedar . . . and expel
for his sake the whole race of corruption. " The Calabrian
official utilising the resounding metaphors of the Byzantine
court diction here represents the Emperor as Jupiter, the angry
Thunder-God ; not seriously different from the phrases which
the Imperial Chancery was wont to lavish on the Ruler : " Of
a truth earth and sea revere him and the winds of heaven praise
him whom the Deity has granted to be the true Emperor of the
World, the Friend of Peace, the Protector of Love, the Founder
of Law, the Preserver of Justice, the Son of Power who ruleth
the World."
In his great Crusade manifesto from Jerusalem Frederick
had praised God, " who commanded the winds and the waves
and they obey him." Now the same phrase is used of him as
if he were himself the incarnate God : " Who bindeth the
corners of the earth and ruleth the elements." Even the foe
recognised his supernatural quality — for evil. His adherents
worshipped him as a Gcd : " Thy power, O Caesar, hath no
bounds ; it excelleth the power of man, like unto a God,"
writes one of his courtiers. A second says : " Wear the crown
that beseems thy supernatural position." A third praises him
as the co-operator Dei, the coadjutor of God. Such phrases
were, of course, the current coin of this Hohenstaufen court,
522 CULT OF FREDERICK vm
but they characterise the monarch. Behind the adulations of
the courtiers, often grossly overdone, we can see the truth : the
impression the Emperor wished to make, especially on his own
followers. The language of a court coterie is always two-edged,
by turns veiling and revealing. If the phrase of the worshipper
is taken too seriously it immediately becomes a jest, but if it is
treated merely as a courtly game it suddenly is fully and literally
intended.
This homage shows at least that Frederick enjoyed a degree
of supernatural reverence that was unique. Nothing proves
this more clearly than the deep anxiety which the Emperor-cult
evoked on the papal side. They reproached him with allowing
himself to be worshipped like a God, with letting men call
him holy and kiss his feet, with aiming at founding a priestly
Empire. None of these accusations is strictly true, but none
is entirely false.
Earlier Emperors had been praised as deus de prole deorum,
vicar of God, second David, holy, divine, the anointed of the
Lord, Christus Domini, Sakator Muhdi. There was nothing
far-fetched in this because the Christian Middle Ages — unlike
pagan antiquity — had only one type of God in human form :
the Saviour. What seemed to the Church so satanic, so
acutely dangerous, was that in addition to the stereotyped and
relatively harmless formulas previously in use men spoke of
Frederick as " versed in the divine plans," " ceaselessly illumi
nated by the eye of God," as a real, active, divine force.
Apparent humility took a step back and conceived him as an
emanation of the true God, a son of God, and continually
placed him on the same plane as the Redeemer Christ himself.
Perpetual reiteration gave these claims a peculiar ring, and their
effect was enhanced by the fact that the world was at the
moment wrought up to an hourly, vivid expectation of an
imperial Messiah. Frederick II was the only Emperor of whom
posterity cherished the dream that he would return as Saviour
at the End of the World.
The Emperor himself, and Piero della Vigna earlier, had
given the courtiers the note : the letter to Jesi, the Emperor's
Bethlehem, is the best example of the style. An echo was only
to be expected. A few years later an imperial governor with
COURTIER'S STYLE S23
his troops was surrounded, and in need he wrote : " Our fore
fathers looked no more eagerly for the coming of Christ than
we do for thine. . . . Come to free and to rejoice us. ...
Show thy countenance and we shall find salvation ! . . . This
it is for which we groan, this for which we sigh : to rest under
the shadow of thy wings. " An imperial notary goes even
further in numerous appeals from prison to the Emperor :
c< O harbour of salvation to them that believe . . . lead the
children of Israel out of Egypt ... we endure torment for
thee such as the martyrs endured for Christ. . . ." One of the
faithful Sicilian bishops, when summoned to court, writes :
" Walking on the waters I shall come to my Lord."
After the second excommunication it became the fashion for
the courtiers to keep up this " style " even in conversation
amongst themselves. It is noteworthy, indicating the plane
on which the Emperor moved, that all their allusions are either
to Caesar or to Christ, never to Charlemagne or any of the
great medieval Emperors. Piero della Vigna had had the
largest share in creating this figure of his master. The vital
thing was that Frederick II found spirits to praise him and
recognise him : that he not only felt himself to be the emissary
of God but was believed to be so by his followers.
It is Piero della Vigna and his circle of jurists, stylists and
literati who supply the enduring expression of this conception.
The time believed that the first and second ages of Adam and
of Christ were overpast and that the third was drawing on.
Piero della Vigna boldly pointed to his imperial master as the
hero of the third and coming age, the ruler " whom the Great
Artificer's hand created man," " into whose breast all virtues
are poured, on whom the clouds rain justice and the heavens
send their dew." And della Vigna praises in this last Emperor
of the ancient Empire the " ideal of good," " who is free from
crooked sight, who bindeth the corners of the earth and ruleth
the elements, that frost is mated with fire, and wet with dry, and
rough with smooth, and the pathless is wedded to him whose
ways are straight."
The marriage of opposites had been from of old the token of
an aurea aetas, a Golden Age in which strife and war shall
cease : an age of peace which the Saviour-Emperor shall bring.
S24 A NEW PETER vm
The Logothetes, therefore, praises his master: " In his day
shall the bonds of evil be loosened and with might shall security
be sown : men shall beat their swords to ploughshares for the
bond of peace causeth all fear to cease." Piero della Vigna was
not alone in his belief that the reign of peace had come again
under Frederick IL A North Italian sings : "cuius ad im-
perium redit aetas aurea mundo." Another Italian poet in his
enthusiasm over Frederick's great victory at sea hopes that this
severe defeat will teach the Pope the kind of peace which awaits
him at the end of the strife :
Et Puer Apuliae terras in pace habebit.
The youthful name of Frederick II is revived again to link the
Vergilian prophecies of thje divine peace-bringing boy with the
Messiah whom men now were seeking or had found in Caesar
Augustus. Thus myth and poem and prophecy were inter
woven in the life of that Emperor who had redeemed the Holy
Sepulchre and was now waging war on a corrupted clergy.
The fusion of the Messiah-Emperor and the Sicilian God of
Justice in the person of Frederick II gave a peculiarly practical
and human character to the new Emperor-cult. In turning
over the letters that passed to and fro between the courtiers
we find such unanimity of tone and phrase as almost amounts
to a " secret dogma/' which grows more concentrated and
forceful in proportion as the Pope is seen as the false and
Frederick as the true Vicar of Christ. It was natural to turn
to Piero della Vigna as the Peter and Prince of the Apostles of
this new imperial Savipur. Delia Vigna became " like unto
the new Law-bearer, Moses, descending from Sinai, bringing
the tables of the law from Heaven to men," or, again, " a second
Joseph to whom as a true interpreter the mighty Caesar whose
power the Sun and Moon admire has handed over the direction
of the kingdoms of the earth. He was the Peter who bears the
keys of Empire and locks what no man may open, and opens
what no man again may lock." " Peter, the humble fisher, the
Prince of the Apostles, who left his nets and followed God . . .
but this law-bearing Peter quits not his Master's side. The
Galilean thrice denied his Lord ... far be it from the Capuan
to deny his Master once." The trend of courtly thought is
AN IMPERIAL CHURCH 525
even more clearly revealed in the half serious letter which was
written to Piero della Vigna. " And the Lord said : ' Peter,
lovest thou me ? Feed my sheep/ and thus the Lord who
loveth Justice wished to build justice on this rock and give the
reins of law into the hands of Peter, making you the custodian
of justice. To show this the more clearly the Lord hath placed
you over against the face of him who is the President but also
the Perverter of the Church, that the true vicegerent Peter may
rule through Justice while the false Vicar of Christ perverts his
vicegerency to the injury of many in body, goods and name. . . .
If such a charge oppresses you, since you are unaccustomed to
it and never sought it ... you can only answer * Lord thou
knowest that I love thee. If I can serve thy people I refuse
not the service : Thy will be done.' "
This was not, as has sometimes been assumed, a serious
suggestion that Piero della Vigna should be, in fact, elevated
as a real Anti-Pope, but it contained the idea that the Head of
the " imperial Church, " the jurist hierarchy, should be in a
special sense an " Anti-Pope." Below the half-serious, half-
jesting flattery with which the courtier recalls the master to his
lofty duties, urging : " the Pope is useless, do thou, as the true
Peter, discharge his duties/' we detect the lofty sense of dignity
and responsibility which inspired the Court, and the clear con
sciousness that the imperial hierarchy of jurist and official
formed an independent spiritual order like the Pope's Church,
and quite as good. Napoleon's thought: " Gown against
gown, esprit de corps against esprit de corps, judge against
priest,'* was anticipated, in other words, at Frederick's court.
To express ideas such as these was in those days only possible
by using the symbols of the only spiritual kingdom then known :
the Church with Christ her King.
To establish the worship of a spiritual ruler without the
Church men were fain to employ the Church's methods ;
while to celebrate the warlike triumphs of the Emperor their
thoughts leaped forthwith to the pagan Caesars. Thus it is
that the State is called the imperialis ecdesia, the provinces are
conceived as bishops' dioceses and the purchase of office as
simony. At moments men went further and stated that the
Emperor's Church, founded on Peter, was manifest whenever
526 ART AND WORSHIP vm
" the spirit of the Illustrious Emperor draws strength from a
supper with his disciples.'' We recall in this connection the
High Mass of Justitia^ the mystery and the sacratissimum
ministerium, the solemn exotic ritual of the High Court when
the Law Incarnate was revealed in the Emperor's person, when
the Emperor whispered his sentence to his Logothetes, who
announced it to the kneeling multitude, while the tinkling of
the bell betokened the mystic communion that was consum
mated. The essential result of the identification of Frederick
with the Son of God is the reintroduction of the human element.
The State was cemented by the direct belief of his disciples in
a living man and his divine mission. Such a faith as saints
evoke by miracles, but never an Emperor inspired save Frederick
only. He wrought no miracles, but he was called " Trans
former/ ' ' ' Wonder of the World. ' ' He was inevitably glorified
into a saint, and men gave him the title of the Byzantine Em
peror : " Long live the name of St. Frederick amongst the
people ! "
There would be no need to pay so much attention to the
inflated homage of the courtiers' writings if this worship of
Frederick had been confined to the rhetoric of the Vigna circle.
This, however, was by no means the case. This extra-
ecclesiastical " sacred cult " of a living man had other and very
different consequences : it led to the representation and im
mortalisation of this divine person in art. The remarkable
outburst of south Italian plastic art, an early breath as it were
of the Renaissance, that suddenly blossomed as if by magic in
the carefully-tended Paradise that was Frederick's Sicilian
kingdom, gave more open and more unmistakable expression
to the feelings which the elaborate metaphors of the courtiers*
letters half obscured.
This new art formed no exception to the law that represen
tational art is dependent on a living worship — certainly in
primitive times. The great works of Hohenstaufen sculpture
in Sicily date almost without exception from the last ten years
of Frederick's life, from the period after Cortenuova when the
Emperor-worship began to take more definite shape and play
FREDERICK-WORSHIP 527
a more ceremonial role. Amongst court circles it began to
strike a more human and personal note and gradually to develop
into a Frederick- worship. The sculpture was inspired by the
worship of the Hohenstaufen God : at no moment was this
" ruler, wrought and made man by the Great Artificer's hand "
more vividly present to men's minds than in that solemn
ceremony in which he, clothed in the awe of his divine majesty
as highest judge and lawgiver, consummated in the eyes of all
his communion with God when God, incarnate as Law, became
man in the stainless Son ! "
The literary records tell of that High Mass of the Emperor's,
the " supper with the disciples/' the founding of the imperialis
ecclesia on Peter, his nearest intimate, and the works of art
themselves, representing man in his " ideal/5 i.e. his divine
moment, can mean no less. In those days when the solemn
ritual was evolved and della Vigna, under the exotic title of
Logothetes, officiated, as intermediary and speaker for the
Emperor, there was created in Naples a representation, prob-%
ably a relief, picturing the scene. It has not been preserved,
but has been described with considerable exactness : In the
background the Emperor was seen high and lifted up, seated
on his throne, beside him at a more modest elevation Piero
della Vigna, and in the foreground, at the Emperor's feet, the
kneeling people. The multitude was demanding Justice from
the Emperor, the chronicler declares, and the inscription tells
the same tale :
CAESAR — AMOR LEGUM. FREDERICK PIISSIME REGUM
CAUSARUM TELAS NOSTRARUM SOLVE QUERELAS.
The person so addressed who is to loose the web of strife, and
who in his Book of Laws describes himself as weaving the woof
of Justice, points to Piero della Vigna, the transmitter of the
divine commands, as who should say ; " Turn to this man in
your strife. He will give judgment or beg me to do so, Vigna
is his surname ... he is called Peter, the Judge."
Even without the explanatory verses of the inscription the
arrangement of the scene would have indicated what was here
represented : this was the Emperor " in cultu Justitiae"
Justice, poured forth in due gradation. As Justice reigns as
S28 A PROFANE ART vm
mediatrix between God and the Emperor, so Petrus Judex is
represented as mediator between the Emperor of Justice and
the people. Men were accustomed thus to see their ruler
holding his High Court. The vitally important point is that
we have here a representation of no abstract thought, but of
real, actual life as it was known and seen. We have no know
ledge how far this relief in the palace of Naples approached the
antique, but under Frederick II all plastic art turned towards
antiquity, driven by an inner necessity, quite independent of
the Emperor's personal predilections. For the sculpture that
came to birth in Sicily was a " profane " art. Here, in the
Pope's fief, in scorn of the Church, came to birth the first great
non-religious art of the West such as served to celebrate the
State and the State Gods in the days of the old Roman Divi, if
by " profane " we understand a contrast to ecclesiastical and
religious representation. The secular art of the Hohenstaufen
State was in its own way no less " sacred.0
In the Middle Ages all creative art had been exclusively
ecclesiastical ; the outburst of new creativeness, and the new
style associated with the secular state, inevitably meant rever
sion to the antique, and the dependence was surprisingly
intimate. For a whole millennium all pictorial representation
had served the glorification of the Saviour or his followers, the
Saints. Pictures of rulers formed no exception : they were
confined to chapels and cathedrals and were designed to magnify
the Redeemer. Now for the first time plastic art was given a
meaning, a life, a consecration, a raison d'etre by the secular
State. Only the worship of the Emperor Frederick makes this
possible. Here, in the secular world, outside the Church,
another son of God was glorified.
From another point of view this ultimate dependence on
antiquity and its method of seeing and portraying was entirely
logical. The hieratical-ecclesiastical art had devoted its first
attention to the relation which the presentation bore to the
God of the other world, and its second thought only to the
object represented. Here a bodily presentation of the World
Ruler himself was possible : a portrait of the man who was, as
he was. Truth and reality in art, which a heavenly subject
rendered superfluous and which could be replaced by signs and
REALITY IN ART 529
symbols and frozen symmetries, now became the important
aim. The beautiful golden coins indicate that even a " like
ness " was by no means to be despised : " In order that the
form of the money may bring our name to your memory and
our illustrious image to your eyes . . . that the frequent sight
thereof may strengthen you in your loyalty and fire your
devotion." Above the image on the seal is written : " The
human impulse to fulfil commands received, faith in the mes
sage sent, these things are only justified by the image stamped
in wax or metal of him who issues the commands." On the
seals the image is still mainly a mere " sign," but this image
speaks like a command, and the more it resembles the com
manding person the greater will be the force it carries. This
was the point to which the Emperor attached importance : the
imperial image would be potent by recalling the PERSON, and
power would radiate from it as grace from a sacred picture
through religious faith.
Emancipated from the rigidity and symbolism of religious
convention and once more in touch with life, everything in
Hohenstaufen plastic art turned towards antiquity, whose
achievements in a " profane " self-sufficing State had no need
of Christian or mystic interpretation to be sacred. The recog
nition that every thing existed in its own right, was in itself
divine and god-devised, was reinforced by the new conception
of art for which Frederick stood. He had an eye for the bodies
of man and beast such as no man before him had possessed,
and his strong feeling of affinity with the Caesars had given him
a keen appreciation of the art of their times. He filled his
Apulian castles with ancient sculptures. From Grottaferrata,
near Rome, he had a bronze cow and a bronze male statue
transported to Apulia. From Naples slaves had had to carry
on their shoulders ancient works of art to adorn the castle
of Lucera. Almost all his castles boasted similar treasures.
High on a wall of the inner court of Castel del Monte a relief
may even now be seen, on which horses and riders can still be
distinguished. Perhaps it was a Meleager hunting-scene such
as was a favourite subject for sarcophagi . . . such as adorns
the tomb in which Frederick buried the remains of his first
consort, Constance of Aragon, in the cathedral of Palermo.
530 MASONS AS SCULPTORS vin
The Emperor by no means contented himself with such
works of art as were already to hand. His sculptors were com
missioned to make more. Many heads and fragments of
sculpture in Castel del Monte are probably copies of antique
originals. Imitation, however, was not good enough. The
Apulian stone masons received remarkable commissions and
were set to work from real life, though in antique style. At
times one might imagine that these were genuine relics of
Roman days did not some detail betray the thirteenth century.
The Emperor's " unquenched desire " to renew the greatness
of the Caesars, to take his stand beside the Augusti and measure
himself against them, called forth these wonderful creations :
figures in the round more like the antique than any preceding
medieval work. Since the days of the Roman Emperors no
state divinities had called for representation. What Christian
ruler would have thought it necessary to build a great triumphal
arch to glorify himself and his State, and decorate it with the
figures of his trusty followers. Who would have dared to crave
it ! Who would have dared to execute it !
We need not here further emphasise the boldness of an
earthly warrior's celebrating his own triumph in a day when
men recognised only One as victor. A strongly fortified bridge
head had been in course of construction since 1234 in front of
the town of Capua, to guard the Via Appia where it crossed the
Volturno. The fortification itself \ the plan of which the
Emperor had sketched with his own hands, seems to have been
roughly finished by 1239. It was probably about this time,
when Frederick was returning as Triumphator to his own king
dom, that he decided to adorn the gate of the bridge with
sculptures and develop it into an ornamental arch. " The
magnificent marble portal " which has been so much praised
was not completed till 1247. This work of art, begotten of the
Hohenstaufen rule in Sicily, was much admired throughout
Renaissance times.
It must not be compared with the Arch of Trajan in the
adjacent Benevento. The combination of fortification and
triumphal arch recalls rather the gate of the Castel Nuovo in
Naples which was erected two centuries later by Alfonso I of
Aragon, a ruler who in many points is a true heir of Frederick II.
THE CAPUAN GATE 531
We are told that " two towers of astounding size, beauty and
strength " flanked the entrance to the Capuan Gate. Every
thing was faced with marble or a stone resembling marble ; the
hewn stones, as in all Frederick's buildings, were so skilfully
fitted that the joints secured by molten lead were practically
invisible. The victories and triumphs of Frederick were por
trayed in relief. The side that faced the town was adorned
with figures of Mercury, and the keystone was a laurel-crowned
head of Jupiter (possibly plundered from the neighbouring
amphitheatre of Capua). The outer side that faced the
traveller who was approaching Capua along the Via Appia was
more ornate. Gigantic statues, all carved by Frederick's own
sculptors, filled the niches. We are not absolutely certain of
the arrangement of the figures, but everything indicates that in
the highest place of all there stood a female form, double or
even treble life-size, whose powerful and beautiful head is still
extant. The features recall the majesty, the reflective power,
the serenity of a Farnese Juno. In spite of the general antique
effect of this colossal figure the details are not indebted to
antique models. The hand of this goddess is pointing to her
breast, where instead of a heart the imperial eagle stretches
his wings and claws — perhaps the scarcely-tamed eagle of
the coins.
This figure probably stood alone, crowning the summit of
the structure. The eagle is not the only indication that this
figure stands in intimate relation to that of Frederick himself
in the niche immediately below. The armies of the French
Revolution shattered the head of this figure and have left only
the trunk, but much can be deduced from even the fragments
of this life-size statue. Frederick was represented, as on the
Augustales, wearing the mantle of the Roman Imperator, but
otherwise the usual dress of his day ; his beardless, still-youthful
face (deduced from a gem) looking straight before him, scanning
the new arrival with his calm unruffled gaze. His forearm is
stretched out in an attitude half of menace, half of benediction,
familiar in certain pictures of Christ. Two fingers of one hand
were raised " as if," says the chronicler, " his mouth were about
to give voice to the resonant threatening of the verses " which
are engraved in a semicircle above his head. They form a
532 JUSTITIA IN STONE vm
distich : the hexameter is apparently spoken by the Goddess
above :
At the bidding of Caesar I stand, guarantor for the peace of
the kingdom.
The pentameter is assigned to Frederick himself :
In wrath I shall ruin the man whom I know to be faithless.
This couplet forms a second link between Frederick and the
Goddess.
Two other figures give the clue to the identity of the exalted
figure who is represented as larger than the Emperor, and stands
above him and yet with him forms a unity. Right and left of
the Emperor and probably slightly lower, very possibly one on
each of the towers, are two busts which are usually interpreted
with extreme probability as two High Court Judges : the one
Piero della Vigna, the other Thaddeus of Suessa. Each of their
niches bears a hexameter. The one offers the invitation :
Enter with confidence all who purpose to live without trepass ;
while the second threatens :
He who is faithless may fear to end as an exile in fetters.
This more than human female form, which later patriotism
interpreted as a representation of the town of Capua, can have
been no other genius than the " Justitia Augusti," one with
Caesar and yet greater than man, and exalted even above the
Emperor : Justice communicating her commands through the
Emperor to the Judges, Frederick II in life : " Father and
Son of Justitia."
The composition of the three-storied Capuan Gate tells the
same tale as the relief in the palace at Naples, where the mul
titude, awed by the fear of the Lord, kneel before incarnate
Justice. There was no need to portray the multitude on the
triumphal arch ; they were represented by the living passers-by,
who if they did not pause to kneel would yet shudder before
the threatening Judgment Day. It was certainly Frederick's
intention here to inspire the people with fear of the divine
imperial power by this image of himself, by the impression on
the eye — " whose sight is more potent than aught that the ear
perceives." The chronicler confirms this hypothesis, for he
NO CHRISTIAN SYMBOL 533
himself felt the effect the Emperor intended : " The threatening
verses were inscribed to inspire fear in those who passed through
the gate and fear in those to whom the figures themselves spake."
We recall the Sicilian representatives of the " Pantocrator "
or " Immanuel," " famous in his majesty, terrible in his glory,"
figures of Christ still Byzantine in style, with unmoved gaze,
slightly oblique, almost cruel, compelling perhaps a shuddering
love through the fear of sword and lawbook which the threaten
ing-blessing figure holds in its hands.
Such fear Frederick II definitely sought to evoke. The
Sicilian Kingdom of Peace and of Justice whose threshold was
marked by this Gate of Judgment could only be maintained, to
quote Piero della Vigna, " by the fear which the Emperor in
spired who was skilled both to correct and to chastise by the
rod of his victory ". . . a spirit close akin to Dante's, who
inscribed the verse : " All hope abandon ye who enter here/'
over the gate that led into the realm of God's Justice.
People of those days were ready to give an ecclesiastical-
allegorical turn to the interpretation of the gate of Capua. The
Gesta Romanorum first describe the portal with accuracy, and
then provide a strange interpretation : the Emperor's figure
becomes that of our Lord Jesus Christ. The marble gate
represents Holy Church through which men enter into the
Kingdom of Heaven. The female figure of Justice becomes
the Saviour's Virgin Mother and the Vigna bust John the
Evangelist, Even the courtiers could scarcely have given an
interpretation more flattering to their imperial master. The
pious writer, however, had another end in view. This building
and these figures which display no solitary Christian symbol —
the Emperor has not even a cross upon his crown but is wearing
the simple Roman pointed diadem—must be robbed of their
dangerous pagan suggestion and ecclesiasticised. As a cardinal
wrote about Frederick, however, in another context, " The
stones hurled against him by the Pope turn to straw, like filth
he scatters the gold of the papal anathema, he lets the rays of
the sun fall upon him, and he fears the God of the Lightning
as little as an archer with his bow.1'
534 HOME-GROWN ARTISTS vm
The Church looked askance at this new art, and amongst the
papalists it became an obsession to accuse the Ghibellines of
idol- and image-worship. Even Dante did not escape : he was
said to have placed wax figures in smoke. It must have seemed
an unspeakable hubris that the same Emperor who denied the
general immortality of the soul should cause the perishable
body to be carved in stone " for eternal and undying memory."
" Frederick dares to alter laws and epochs " was the papal
verdict on the " Transformer of the World/'
Sicilian plastic art would have been unthinkable without the
glorification of the World Ruler and the World Judge, and was
indeed so entirely grounded thereon that, apart from a few late
echoes, monumental art in the antique style died with the death
of Frederick II. A Gothic reaction set in everywhere, super
seding the antique which had been reawakened by the State for
the glory of the State.
For many decades to come there was no call for the repre
sentation of godlike man ; only one Emperor had been able to
inspire and to compel this homage. After him no one indi
vidual was sufficiently pre-eminent ; without the Emperor, the
unique ruler who is " the one thing that exists in its own
integrity and forms no part of another/' the life-giving breath
was lacking. Thus it fell out that the magic glory of the
Caesars that had suddenly blazed up in the south with Frede
rick perished with him and died away like a terrifying but
seductive emanation of Lucifer.
Not the least part of the miracle lay in Frederick's finding
the artists who could carry out such unwonted tasks in a form
so perfect. For the products of these imperial sculptors reached
a level which Italian art did not soon regain. The amazing
thing was that Frederick drew these artists from his own
Sicilian kingdom, and begot as it were his own sculptors, as he
had earlier begotten his own poets. How he conjured this
ability from his simple Apulian stone-masons is a mystery.
He required it for the glorification of his State and his State
Gods, and what he required he was wont to get.
The names of some of these masters are known. They were
for the most part natives of Apulia and the Capitanata. Their
names throw no light on the mystery. The creative force was
ART AND INTERDICT 535
not theirs. These masons were instructed to follow closely the
antique models ; the first school of art that worked systemati
cally from the antique, directed by one master mind, was the
imperial School of Sculpture in Apulia. Without the com
pulsion which the Emperor exercised the work of the Sicilian
sculptors ceased, though a son of the imperial master-craftsman,
Bartholomew of Foggia, was still able to carry out a noble work,
the bust of Sigilgaita at Ravello. Only one exception might
perhaps be made in favour of Nicholas of Pisa.
It seems no longer in doubt that this artist, though later
settled in Pisa, was a native of Apulia. Vasari, who counts
him as the earliest master of plastic art in the Italian Renais
sance, relates him vaguely to the Sicilian school and to the
master of the Capuan Gate. It is by no means impossible that
Nicholas had learned and worked anonymously amongst the
imperial sculptors of his native country before, in 1260, he
created his first masterpiece, the pulpit in the Baptistery at
Pisa. Whether Nicholas of Pisa was directly or indirectly the
bringer of new vision to Italy, there is no doubt that sculpture
after the antique spread, as vernacular poetry had spread, from
south to north, from Sicily to Upper Italy. It was noticed
from the beginning that poetry and the new plastic art alike
struck their first roots in the imperial towns of Italy. Nicholas's
first works were created in Pisa, Siena, Pistoia, at a time when
these towns lay under papal interdict.
Vasari records that Nicholas of Pisa learnt his craftsmanship
by copying ancient vases and sarcophagi. Where was this done
elsewhere in Italy, and where, with such method as in the
imperial School in Apulia, in which this exercise was imposed
by Frederick as a duty ? Who opened the eyes of the Apulian,
and indirectly, therefore, of the Italian masters, to see and
appreciate the works of the ancients, if not the man who in
other spheres taught men " to draw new water from old
wells " ? Frederick did not himself -wield hammer and chisel,
yet the sculptors are his creatures and his pupils. A recent
French art-critic exclaims : C'est Tempereur qui a &t& le vrai
sculpteur !
There is no reason to doubt that the true statesman can evoke
a new art of poetry, of architecture and of sculpture, the more
536 DIET IN FOGGIA vm
that the magic of the chisel thrives best in the ordered atmos
phere of a living state, in which the voice of the community
begins to make itself heard. Thus this Hohenstaufen Emperor,
whom men hailed as the image of God, who was the first human
incarnation of Universal Law, became by the glorification of
his state and of his person the founder of a new plastic art,
consciously drawing its inspiration from the pagan. Almost
contemporaneously a new school of painting was born within
the Church, which based itself immediately on the reanimated
myth of early Christian worship. The recent theory is that the
glorification of St. Francis fired the new " Gothic'* painting.
In March 1240 Frederick II returned to his Sicilian kingdom,
but all his thoughts and plans were now directed to the develop
ment of the Italian monarchy. In spite of having been absent
for five years, in spite of having spent four in almost continuous
campaigning in Upper and Central Italy, he allowed himself
only a few weeks of rest in his beloved Sicily. " Such yearning
and care for the pacification of Italy impels us ... that neither
the need of rest nor recreation, nor yet the delights of our
kingdom can hold us back. When with diligence and perse
verance we had accomplished the great tasks which were
inherent in our greatest task of all, we speedily quitted Sicily
without rest, which would have been fatal to our activity, and
fared forth in the heat of summer and the dust of the camp,
eschewing dangers neither to our faithful followers nor to
ourselves."
After a Diet in Foggia, the complete restaffing of all Sicilian
offices, and the promulgation of a number of new laws,
Frederick was in May 1240 actually again encamped near
Capua with the newly-levied army. In June he advanced
against the frontier of the Papal States. His intention was to
compel the Romans to open their gates and the Pope to make
peace if possible, by a campaign of devastation in the Roman
Campagna. At the last moment the Emperor had to change
his plans. The new Grand Master of the Teutonic Order,
Conrad of Thuringia, arrived as envoy from the secular and
spiritual princes of Germany who hoped as intermediaries to
1240 WEAKENING BAN 537
negotiate a peace between Emperor and Pope, as they had been
successful in doing after the Crusade.
The Pope's proceedings against Frederick had completely
failed in their effect. From over-frequent use the ban had lost
its edge, and was no longer the formidable weapon it had been
of yore ; the release of subjects from their allegiance had like
wise worn thin. The sentence of excommunication was, it is
true, to be pronounced anew every Sunday from every pulpit
in the world with burning of candles and tinkling of bells.
This, no doubt, took place in foreign countries, though often
under protest. In those very countries, however, where the
reading of the papal bull was most vital to Pope Gregory,
within the Empire itself, there was no lack of resistance and
obstruction. Innumerable communities in Italy were them
selves under the ban for the most various reasons, and no
Church service was being held in them in any case. Every
town which Frederick visited fell automatically under an inter
dict, and we may fairly doubt whether in any case any bishop
throughout Imperial Italy would have dared to read the ban :
and in Sicily it is improbable that any single priest was found
to incur the risk to life and property. Moreover, all adherents
of the Emperor's, like the Archbishop of Palermo, were also
excommunicate, and any Sicilian bishop who was not an
adherent was speedily banished.
In Germany also numerous spiritual princes refused to pro
claim the excommunication from the pulpit. The bishops of
Germany were as reluctant as the secular princes to imperil
their rights as lords of the land by taking sides against the
Emperor to whom they owed so great an extension of these
rights. They rarely went so far as to make any move against
the Pope, and certainly not against the Emperor : for the most
part they calmly looked on.
Pope Gregory may well have hoped to win over the princes,
usually so ready to revolt against the Emperor, and to turn
them against this Hohenstaufen, as Innocent III had so suc
cessfully done against the Welf Otto. But Gregory's expec
tations were disappointed, as at the time of the Crusade. His
attempt to set up a rival king failed utterly ; the envenomed
letters in which he posed as the protector of princely privilege
538 LOYALTY OF PRINCES vm
which Frederick was seeking to undermine fell on deaf ears,
as did his insinuations that Frederick was seeking to destroy
all Christian princes and magnates by the hands of his assassins
in order to rule alone. Frederick II had succeeded beyond
belief in attaching the princes to himself, and they viewed
the situation clearly. First the spiritual and then the secular
princes wrote unanimously to the Pops, and stated in the
clearest and most unequivocal language that the sole cause of
the ban was the Pope's having espoused the cause of those arch-
traitors, the Lombards. The princes recalled that their posi
tion was a dual one : on the one hand as prelates they were
sons of the Church, on the other hand as princes of the Empire
they were vassals of the Emperor, and that they must not fail
in their duty as members of the Empire ; they would greatly
grieve if they were driven to mourn for the Church. At the
same time they offered the Pope their assistance in re-estab
lishing between him and the Emperor the peace they most
earnestly desired to see. All the princes joined in one great
common declaration, and, further, each wrote separately, de
scribing the confusion into which th£ world had been plunged
by this new quarrel, and imploring the Pope to release the
Emperor from the ban.
The German Grand Master had just at this moment reached
the Pope bearing the princes' proposals, and Frederick did
not care to jeopardise the arbitration by a new invasion of the
Patrimonium. The Emperor had, it is true, no hope that the
stiff-necked Pope would accept any peace that was not wrung
from him, and the negotiations in fact proved fruitless.
With unblushing effrontery the Pope suddenly announced
that he could release the Emperor from the excommunication
incurred by his heresy, godlessness and persecution of the
Church, only if the enemies of the Emperor, the Lombards,
were included in the peace. Though Pope Gregory had always
firmly denied that the Lombard question was in any way con
nected with the excommunication, and had made the most
far-fetched allegations in his bulls and manifestos (though it
was known in the market-place that he had banned the Emperor
to save the Lombards from his vengeance), yet now Frederick's
release was to be effected, not by penance for acknowledged
1240 FALL OF RAVENNA 539
sin, but by political concessions to the Lombards. We can
hardly wonder that the negotiations broke down; not even
an armistice was achieved. All subsequent peace overtures
foundered on the same reef ; the Curia clung to the Lombard
clause, and Frederick with perfect justice refused to buy his
absolution at the price. The German Grand Master died a
few weeks after his arrival in Rome, and Frederick meantime
had resumed the fighting in the Romagna, though not in the
Patrimonium.
The Emperor's position had grown less favourable since the
defection of Ravenna in the preceding year. The imperial
cause was gravely endangered in the Romagna. The papal
legate, Gregory of Montelongo, had rallied Venetians, Bolog-
nese and others and conquered Ferrara, while Bologna and
Faenza had throughout belonged to the League. The Em
peror now marched north along the Adriatic through the March
of Ancona. It was summer and he was attacked by a slight
fever in the swampy country which, however, " we so over
came by the might of the spirit that it did not presume to stay
our victorious progress after the end of the critical day." By
the middle of August he lay with a modest force of Germans,
Tuscans and Apulians before Ravenna. He had originally
intended to march on Bologna, but hearing that Paulus Traver-
sarius was dead, who had been the leader of the anti-imperial
party in Ravenna, and that feeling in the town was veering
round, he changed his plan and appeared before Ravenna.
The water supply was cut off, and the town after a six-day
siege surrendered and gave hostages. It was then received
into favour.
Frederick was now free to turn to Bologna. If he had
invested Bologna, however, Faenza lying further to the south
would have threatened his rear. It, therefore, seemed prudent
first to take Faenza. Frederick counted no doubt on succeed
ing as quickly here as at Ravenna. But a mere siege effected
nothing. The town offered an unexpectedly strong resistance,
the garrison having been heavily reinforced by Venetians and
Bolognese, and the defence was conducted by a young
S4o BLOCKADE OF FAENZA vm
Florentine of twenty-three, Count Guido Guerra. The Counts
Palatine of the Guidi family were usually staunch imperialists,
but this one grandson of " the chaste Guldrada " (whom Dante
praises as a fine soldier though a sodomite) had broken with
the tradition of his house. He plays an important part in the
anti-Hohenstaufen campaigns as one of the bravest Florentine
leaders on the Guelf side.
The Emperor soon got into difficulties at Faenza. Sep
tember had slipped by without a decision. October came
and still the end was not in sight. Frederick now decided to
blockade Faenza completely and spend the winter before the
town. He struck his tents and to everyone's amazement built
strong wooden huts. Before long a complete wooden town,
protected by trenches, stretched in a wide circle round the
beleaguered fortress. Winter undertakings of this sort were
unprecedented. It had not hitherto been Frederick's way to
show this bulldog tenacity. He had usually achieved success
at the first onslaught with comparatively little trouble, and if
that did not succeed he preferred to withdraw as he had done
from Brescia. At this juncture a spectacular failure would have
been fateful, and in spite of innumerable obstacles he must
carry the siege through to the end.
The Emperor's aversion from long-drawn military enter
prises which involved large numbers of troops had a very
practical basis : the cost was enormous. The imperial army
was largely a mercenary one. The only unpaid troops were
the Saracens, who were probably indemnified by grants of land.
All the other Sicilian troops were paid either from the very
first, or after a certain number of days. The feudal system had
been almost wholly superseded in Sicily. At best the vassals
served within the kingdom for a short time at their own ex
pense. If this period was exceeded, or if they were employed
outside Sicily, they received pay, and that at a very high rate.
The difference between vassals drawing pay and ordinary
mercenaries was slight. The Italian towns gave the Emperor
troops on somewhat more favourable terms. The infantry
militia and the knights received pay from their commune for
the first four or six weeks. If this was exceeded, which it
almost always was, then the payment fell on the imperial
FINANCIAL STRAITS 541
Treasury, and this question naturally was of prime importance
in waging war. The storming of a town was often fixed for a
certain day, say November loth, not with reference to the
military situation but because November i2th was the day on
which several thousand men ended their term of service, and a
prolongation of the siege would mean expense. Considera
tions of this sort probably accounted for the speedy abandon
ment of the siege of Brescia by the immense army.
Want began to be felt outside Faenza. In order to make the
blockade complete it was necessary to call up large forces,
especially infantry, which the Italian State had to find. The
surrounding towns, Imola, Forli, Forlimpopolo, Ravenna,
Rimini, were first drawn upon, then Florence and Tuscany in
general, where King Enzio was in charge of recruitment ;
finally, troops were even brought from Western Lombardy,
from Lodi, Vercelli, and Novara. As the blockade grew more
and more protracted money grew scarcer than it had ever been.
At the beginning of the campaign the Emperor had had recourse
to the expedient of collecting the taxes from the Italian towns
in advance for the coming year, remitting one-fifth as interest.
He next helped himself to the treasuries of the Church in
Sicily, as the leaders of the papal troops had done on a previous
occasion. Gold, silver, precious stones, costly brocades, silken
garments, were taken over against a receipt and stored in the
imperial Treasury. Then the ingenious Emperor — perhaps on
the credit of this large treasure — hit on the expedient of issuing
leather money showing the head and the eagle of the golden
Augustales. This leather money was everywhere accepted
without protest, and was later redeemed by the imperial
Treasury.
On the other hand there was no shortage of provisions, for
the routes to Sicily were open to the Emperor. The favourite
sea-route from the Apulian harbours to Ravenna was not wholly
safe. The Emperor's siege of Faenza involved Bologna and
Venice also, and the Venetians had succeeded in plundering
and burning to the ground the two Apulian coast towns of
Termola and Vasto and in capturing an imperial galley near
Brindisi which was returning from Jerusalem. Frederick
at once instituted reprisals ; he requested the Emperor John
542 REPRISALS vm
Vatatzes of Nicaea to raid any Venetian possessions within his
reach and the Sultan of Tunis to break off all commerce with
Venice for the moment. He also subsidised the Dalmatian
pirates of Zara and despatched ships from Ancona against the
Venetians. His Apulian fortresses and dungeons were, more
over, full of hostages from almost all Italian towns, on whom
he could wreak his vengeance. It was at this period that
Pietro Tiepolo was hanged, the son of the Doge of Venice, who
had been taken prisoner at Cortenuova. These measures put
a stop to the attacks of Venice.
The Emperor lay for eight months before Faenza in enforced
idleness while his troops constructed underground tunnels to
the beleaguered town, and the provisions of the besieged began
gradually to be exhausted. He occupied himself by reading
and correcting the translation of an Arabic treatise on hawking
which Master Theodore had made. Weightier matters than
his falcons, however, claimed his attention in this winter camp.
Pope Gregory had schemes afoot that Frederick could not
ignore.
Immediately after his excommunication Frederick had
written to the cardinals and conjured them, "the coadjutors of
Peter, the Senators of the City, the hinges of the World/' to
invite the whole Christian world, kings and princes, bishops
and church dignitaries alike, to send their delegates to a General
Council. He himself would be prepared to submit his case to
this council, even to appear before it in person to prove his
complaints against Pope Gregory, who had in the most serious
manner infringed imperial law in Italy. He might himself
have had recourse to the age-old imperial right to summon
such a council. To preserve the impartiality of this tribunal,
however, which was to judge between him and the Pope, it
seemed to him right that neither he nor Pope Gregory should
approach the world in his own cause ; the College of Roman
Cardinals should issue the invitations.
This eagerly-desired Council never met. Pope Gregory had
sound reasons for preventing it : no Council should sit in
judgment on the Vicar of Christ. He notified instead a Church
GREGORY'S COUNCIL 543
Council to be held a year later. His letters of invitation sug
gest a commonplace agenda : certain affairs of Church and
State are to be discussed : as if one of the usual, not-infrequent
synods was in question. The Pope's real intentions, however,
were not to be misunderstood. The Council was to be sum
moned by the Pope and to be his instrument, and its first duty
would be the deposition of the Emperor. Pope Gregory had
already been canvassing for a successor to the Hohenstaufen :
without success. He first sounded a Danish prince ; when this
candidate refused the Pope tried to win France over by playing
on her historic yearning to fill the imperial throne : a dream
that had not slept since the days of Charlemagne, which lived
in Louis XIV and was realised by Napoleon. Pope Gregory
suggested Count Robert of Artois, brother of Louis IX of
France, as Frederick IPs successor. France declined with the
proud remark that a man in whose veins ran the royal blood of
France was greater than any Emperor whose throne depended
on election. Further, that the Count of Artois had informed
his friend the Hohenstaufen Emperor, a man whom France
beyond measure respected, of the Pope's proposal, and that the
Emperor Frederick had called on the God of Vengeance to
requite His Holiness.
No one could for a moment mistake the intention of this
Council, summoned by Frederick's personal enemy, the Pope,
to which Milan and the other rebel towns were invited to pass
sentence on the Emperor. This Council, usurping the place
of the Council which Frederick desired, must not take place.
Immediately on learning of the Pope's design Frederick started
his counter-measures. He addressed innumerable letters to
bishops, princes and kings, declaring that this Council sum
moned by his personal enemy had only one aim : to decide the
Lombard question. He would, however, never concede the
principle that a spiritual power should adjudicate in state
affairs. He had no quarrel with the Most Holy Church of
Rome, but a grave one with the existing Pope, and as long as
Gregory IX acted as a foe of the Empire he, Frederick, as
Emperor, would take steps to prevent any Council of the High
Priest. He would refuse safe conduct to all delegates attending
the Council, and he warned the whole world against sending
544 FREDERICK'S WARNINGS vm
representatives thereto. He had secured all routes by sea and
land and no one would reach Rome against his wishes. Simul
taneously with these warnings he issued stringent orders to his
supporters in all countries of the Empire to refuse passage to
any seeking to attend the Council, and offered rewards for each
delegate captured. No one could question the possibility of
this blockade, for it was well known that remittances of money
to the Pope merely swelled the imperial coffers.
Frederick II cannot be accused of having made a secret of
his intentions. He always made a practice of making his plans
known beforehand down to the minutest details. He was not
believed ; no one credited him with the serious intention of
carrying his threats into execution, and the world was im
mensely surprised when he did so. The Emperor's strict
command deterred the prelates of Germany, Italy and Sicily
from attending. The western powers, however : England,
France and Spain could scarcely turn a deaf ear to the papal
summons, and proposed to send the heads of their churches to
Rome. Since the Emperor at Faenza could block most of the
land routes Pope Gregory recommended the sea routes to these
western travellers. He put himself in touch with Genoa. A
fleet composed of cargo-boats and war-galleys was to await the
prelates in Nice and Genoa and conduct them to the Tiber
mouth. Corresponding recommendations were made to the
prelates : they would find sea-travel the safer, and might con
fidently trust themselves to the Genoese, with whom the Pope
had made all arrangements and had concluded the necessary-
agreements. The sea-republic was to profit by three thousand
five hundred pounds, of which one thousand was to be paid at
once. The papal legate to whom the negotiations had been
confided had to raise the money from Genoese merchants who
demanded two hundred pounds as interest. The balance was
to fall due for payment a month before the departure of the
fleet, and if Pope Gregory broke the contract he was to pay
five hundred pounds as penalty. The property of the Roman
Church was pledged as security. Genoa was not giving her
assistance for love. Gregory IX accepted all the terms pro
posed, but begged that the preparations might be secret, so that
no hint of them might reach the Emperor.
FREDERICK'S FLEET 545
Frederick II, however, had, as it happened, more adherents
in Genoa than in any other enemy town. The upper nobility
like the Spinola, Doria, Grilli and de Mari were almost ex
clusively Ghibelline (the Margrave Caretto was later to be the
Emperor's son-in-law), so that Frederick was in constant com
munication with the town. One letter of the Emperor's which
had been hidden in an imitation loaf made of wax was inter
cepted by the enemy, and created great excitement in the town,
but other despatches safely reached their destination. How
ever it was achieved, the Emperor in his winter quarters before
Faenza learned exactly what the Pope had planned.
Quietly he made his counter-preparations. First Sicily was
instructed to mobilise and man the fleet. The Emperor was
now to reap the benefit of the sea-power he had so steadily
built up. For years past ship after ship had left the royal
wharves, and Frederick was now in a position to command
at need a fleet of sixty-five galleys. For comparison's sake it
should be mentioned that Genoa could, with difficulty, man a
contingent of fifty boats of war. The Sicilian crews were
brought up to strength by levies on the maritime peoples who
were compelled to serve as sailors, but in return were relieved
from other obligations. The ships' captains were sea-counts,
feudal vassals. Frederick IPs whole organisation of the fleet was
so admirable that the Aragonese in Sicily later exactly repeated
his decrees and re-issued his instructions about the duties of the
Admiral, which included regulations for every branch of the
service. The previous Admiral, Nicolas Spinola, a Genoese,
had recently died. From Faenza Frederick II appointed in
March 1241 another Genoese, Ansaldus de Mari, first as
Admiral of the Kingdom of Sicily. Shortly after, the Emperor
sent him an imperial banner and his warrant as Admiral of
the Roman Empire, an office which Frederick created. The
strength and equipment of the squadron which was destined for
the transport of the prelates was known in its minutest details
to the new Commander of the Fleet, who, being an imperialist,
had thought it discreet to escape secretly from Genoa in
February 1241. His powers as Admiral left him completely
free to take what measures he deemed best. He immediately
assumed command of the Sicilian fleet, which was in readiness to
546 FALL OF FAENZA vm
put to sea, and sailed that same March with twenty-seven galleys
to Pisa to join forces with an equal number of Pisan ships.
Frederick II had been instant in warning the invited guests
to refrain from attending the Council. The Pisans even sought
to dissuade their rivals, the Genoese, from the undertaking, and
other voices also made themselves heard, pointing out the grave
danger of visiting Rome against the Emperor's wishes. One
pamphlet — a product perhaps of the imperial Chancery — pur
porting to be addressed by a well-meaning cleric to his friends
the prelates was particularly urgent. The author dwelt at
length, with evident glee, on the general miseries of a sea-
voyage, describing sea-sickness in its minutest consequences
with the satanic pleasure of a non-sufferer, and, finally, demon
strating that Frederick II, <c a second Nero, a second Herod, "
was " miserly in mercy, prodigal in punishment, full moreover
of wrath, and entirely lacking in piety." He was in command
of all harbours from sea to sea with the sole exception of Genoa ;
from Pisa, Corneto, Naples or Gaeta, he could lie in wait for
all vessels sailing the Ligurian Sea, and who could tell but that
this man of pre-eminent acuteness and cunning might have
bought over the sailors of Genoa ! <c Ye are no gods or saints,"
cried the author, " to have power over his powers." The Pope,
moreover, had embarked on this quarrel without the prelates,
let him conclude it also without them. *' But since the Pope
sees that his undertaking against this mightiest of Tyrants has
been unsuccessful he is now anxious further to sharpen the
sentence pronounced against him, or to threaten him with
deposition and to instal another Emperor in his room, and ye
forsooth are to give your advice and concurrence whether it
seemeth to you good or ill, ye are to be the organ pipes which
echo to the touch and at the good pleasure of the organist/'
The town chronicler of Genoa opens his entries for 1241
with the remark " In this year it pleased the Lord that great
misfortunes should overtake the town." The Sicilian fleet set
out for Pisa at the end of March, and the prelates were to sail
from Genoa at the end of April. The intervening weeks saw
the fall of Faenza. Several times during the winter Frederick
AN HEROIC TOWN 547
had foretold the certainty of its capitulation in the spring. The
heroic town had defended itself with the courage of despair, and
its resistance was strengthened rather than weakened by fear
of the Emperor's wrath and the Emperor's vengeance. In the
extremity of famine the Faentines tried to send away the women
and girls. Frederick ordered them to return at once and to
remind the besieged of the unforgotten insult that Faenza
had done him of old : half a century before they had mortally
offended the Empress Constance, his imperial mother, and
fifteen years before they had sought to assassinate him as he
entered Lombardy on his way to the Diet, though they had in
fact mistakenly slain a knight in his stead who had been wearing
the imperial clothes.
This was the voice of the World Judge who, if he is to be
just in the day of judgment cannot and must not forget, and for
whom Time is naught in face of his own Eternity. Since
Faenza hoped for no mercy it had resisted to the utmost.
The siege had lasted eight months, food was completely
exhausted, the walls were destroyed, and the imperial forces had
entered the city by underground tunnels, then — and not till
then — the valiant town surrendered without awaiting the
Emperor's coup de grdce. Their lives had been promised to
the podesta and the foreigners in the town, but not to the
citizens themselves, who now awaited their fate with natural
anxiety. Frederick, smiling, showed his magnanimity : " Thus
we enter the town in our overflowing gentleness and with the
outstretched arms of inexhaustible clemency we greet the con
version of the believers . . . that they may know that nothing
is juster and lighter and easier to take on them than the yoke
of the Empire."
Faenza fell on April I4th. Frederick remained for a few
weeks in the devastated town and arranged for the construction
of a fortress and a palace. While he was still there several
items of good news arrived. At about the same moment the
papal enclave of Benevento in the kingdom of Sicily had been
conquered, destroyed and obliterated. In the west of Northern
Italy the Emperor's generals were harassing the outlying lands
of Genoa to disorganise the preparations for the Council. The
Apulian Marinus of Eboli, Vicar General of " Upper Pavia,"
548 PAPAL FLEET SAILS vm
had invaded Genoese territory from the North and the Mar
grave Uberto Pallavicini attacked from the East. He had had
several successes and had conquered two fortresses, and the
Emperor, whose arms were now everywhere victorious, wrote
these handsome words to him : " Continue therefore in the
same path and thou wilt assuredly bring to a successful issue
those royal services of ours which thou didst with honourable
intention undertake, Success and Fortune will wait upon thy
deeds, since thou art fighting with the guidance of wisdom in
a fortunate cause, and under a prince whose star is fortunate "
The culminating success was still lacking. Shortly before
the surrender of Faenza Frederick II had sent his son, King
Enzio, on a special mission to Tuscany, " representing the
person and the likeness of his father.*' In Florence King
Enzio received the news of the Emperor's victory. The
Florentine infantry and cavalry had so long served in the
Emperor's armies that the town shared in the glory of his
victory, and the son must have received in his father's place
their testimonies of exultant homage. Enzio hurried on after
a few days. He travelled by way of Prato, giving instructions
for the enlargement of the imperial castle (whose beautiful
entrance gate recalls that of Castel del Monte and anticipates
the Renaissance), and thence to Pisa. He must have reached
Pisa just before the departure of the united Sicilian-Pisan fleet.
He will have brought just the final orders for the Admiral.
He did not himself take part in the naval action, but in Pisa
awaited the outcome.
The prelates had embarked at Genoa on the 28th of April.
Only a few of the spiritual princes, amongst them the English
with their knowledge of the sea, had decided to be warned in
time after seeing the overcrowded vessels and the imperfect
equipment of some of them. These either remained behind
altogether or, at best, sent on their procurators. All the rest,
however : French, Spaniard and Italians from the League
towns had sailed from Genoa amid the blaring of trumpets and
the cheers of the people. They passed Pisa in safety and the
narrow strait between Piombino and Elba. They were ap
proaching their goal, the Roman harbour of Civitavecchia.
After eight days at sea, on the 3rd of May, the festival of the
VICTORY AT SEA 549
Elevation of the Cross, they were attacked by the Emperor's
fleet, which had been lying in ambush between the islands of
Monte Christo and Giglio. A short and bloody battle decided
the victory : three enemy ships were sunk and the passengers
drowned, amongst them the Archbishop of Besan9on. Twenty-
two ships were captured, and only three sailing ships with
Spanish passengers succeeded in escaping to Genoa. It was
a complete victory for the Imperialists, who took over four
thousand ordinary prisoners and over one hundred Church
dignitaries of high rank : three papal legates, including the
Emperor's Mte noire, Cardinal Jacob of Palestrina ; the abbots
of the celebrated monasteries of Cluny, Citeaux, Clairvaux and
Pr6montr6, and a host of archbishops and bishops were in
Frederick's hands.
King Enzio welcomed the victors and their captives in Pisa.
He ordered a mild detention for the highest prelates till an
order from the Emperor arrived commanding him to proceed
with the utmost severity : the prelates had not asked his
mercy ; they had defied his warning. The inferior clergy
remained in the prisons of Pisa, the more important were first
sent to the imperial castle of San Miniato and afterwards for the
most part despatched to Apulia, where they were kept in strict
confinement. Frederick II now held pledges of the utmost
value and utilised them with skill. After a short detention he
released the French, though he had in the first instance met
King Louis' haughty demand fpr the release of his prelates with
a courteous but decided refusal : " Where persecutors of the
Empire exist, the Empire's defenders must not be lacking.
The Empire is greater than individuals, and the single animals
tremble at the sight of the lion's spoor. Your exalted majesty
will therefore not marvel that Augustus keeps the prelates of
France in fear, since they sought to compass the Emperor's
downfall."
Frederick interpreted the victory as the judgment of God
" who looketh down from Heaven and fighteth and judgeth
righteously." A judgment against the Empire's deadly foe,
against Pope Gregory whom God himself had smitten. The
faithful followed the Emperor. The will of God had been
revealed to the World : the Emperor Frederick's office was to
5so GREGORY IMPLACABLE vm
castigate clergy and church, and to renew Justice on the Earth
and Peace. Songs were composed in praise of the Child
of Apulia, victorious, world-conquering. A Dominican an
nounced that in this sea victory " the God of the Earth and of
the Sea had testified that He Himself was the ally of the vic
torious Caesar . . .", and people recalled a prophetic saying, or
perhaps invented it for the occasion : " The sea will be in
carnadined with the blood of the saints." This event made an
enormous impression on the world. Nothing that any previous
emperor had ever dared or done was comparable to this capture
of cardinals and a hundred priests, Frederick's power seemed
boundless, but a certain horror was blended with the admira
tion. Enemies recognised therein the ruthlessness of Satan.
Nothing had so strongly ministered to the conviction that
Frederick was the herald of Antichrist as the capture and
continued captivity of the princes of the Church in the prisons
of the Emperor. Many of them died in his dungeons, and their
blood cried out against this enemy of the faith.
Possibly Frederick hoped to be able to bend the Pope by this
deed of violence and to move him to peace. He presumably
hoped to barter the release of the prelates against his release
from the papal ban. The prisoners themselves implored the
Pope to make peace at last, and the general opinion in Italy was
that this blow would compel Pope Gregory to do so. Gregory
was at the point of death and suffered indescribably from this
rain of heavy blows, and felt himself, moreover, personally
responsible before God for the death and imprisonment of so
many priests, but he was less ready to make peace than ever
before. More than ever must the fight be fought and the
dragon laid low ! He besought the captives for the sake of
God and of the Church to bear their sufferings with patience
and to endure to the end. Even when a new visitation came
that shook the whole Christian world to its foundations, and
imperatively demanded the peace and co-operation of all the
western powers — even then the aged man clung to his hate,
unbending and unbent. Nothing could shake him in his faith-
that he was called by God to fight against Frederick II, though
victory after victory waited on the eagles of Rome, which the
Emperor was bearing against the City.
CHINGIZ KHAN 551
Whilst Frederick was still encamped before Faenza, and the
fleet still lay at anchor in the harbour of Pisa, Europe had, as by
a miracle, escaped the direst fate. The strangest rumours were
current, fed by the Crusaders who brought back tales they had
heard : far in the East there was a mighty king who ruled over
an enormous Empire and was moving towards the west and
conquering one by one the princes of the Mussulmans. The
Christians thought to see in him again the legendary Prester
John, a king after the order of Melchizedek, who had so vividly
appealed to the imagination not only of the people but of
Innocent the Great himself. He was coming to obliterate the
teachings of Muhammad, to unite in Jerusalem with the King
of the West, and to fulfil the time. The Jews, on the other
hand, believed that this King of the East was King David, who
was returning as the Messiah to redeem them. Their faith was
strengthened by the fact that the year 1240 was, according to
their calendar, the year 5,000. The Messiah was to appear in
the first year of the sixth millennium. Christian sources tell the
same tale, and the identification, in his most victorious year, of
Frederick with the Messiah, was not unaffected by this belief.
The Jews gave free rein to their joy at King David's approach
and even dreamt of going forth to meet him with sword and
shield and spear. In many places they were bitterly persecuted
and massacred for their obstinacy in clinging to this belief.
Suddenly the West recognised its error and armed itself in
terror-stricken fear against the tumultuous hordes of Chingiz
Khan. We now know that it was not Chingiz Khan himself
who was leading his hosts against Europe. This Earth- Shaker
of Asia, for sheer power the most appalling phenomenon of
historic time, the man who conquered and organised the most
extensive empire the world has ever seen, who amalgamated
peoples, gave them religion and laws, and let loose the greatest
human hurricane that the force of one man has ever conjured
up, Chingiz Khan, had already closed his unique career of
conquest. But his will lived on. That will which had issued
orders to his son who sought to check the hordes who were
plundering Herat : "I forbid thee ever, save at my direct
command, to treat the inhabitants of any land with leniency.
Pity belongs to weaklings, only severity keeps men in servitude.
55*
THE MONGOL PERIL
VIII
An enemy merely conquered is not tamed, and only hates his
new master."
In the year 1227, when Frederick II was setting out on his
crusade, the Great Khan was buried in the Karakoram. He
had divided up his Empire in his lifetime between his four sons
The West fell to the lot of Batu, who had his capital at Sarai
THE MONGOL PERIL
on the Volga and was himself the founder of the " Golden
Horde." The momentum generated by Chingiz Khan con
tinued uninterrupted in this son. The Russian principalities
had succumbed to him by 1240, and by the beginning of 1241
he was approaching Hungary. Another section of Batu 's army
had conquered Poland and was proceeding against Silesia.
The danger seemed overwhelming. The whole of Asia was for
once united ; Europe, on the other hand, divided, disinte
grated, rent by a thousand mutually-hostile forces. The West
at last began to mobilise, Germany in breathless haste, for the
i24i LIEGNITZ 553
Mongols were swarming over Hungary. An army which the
King of Bohemia recruited came too late : on the loth of April
he made a stand at Liegnitz, but on the 9th, 30,000 men (it is
computed) under Duke Henry of Liegnitz had been cut down
by the Mongols on the battlefield. The Duke, a son of St.
Hedwig, with Slav, Polish and German nobles, had flung them
selves against the Tartars. His army was defeated and he
himself was slain : Germany lay exposed to the onrush of the
foe, but the sacrifice had not been made in vain. In spite of
their victory the Mongols were shaken, and could not face
another encounter with the forces of the King of Bohemia.
They turned sharply south, devastating the greater part of
Moravia, and thrust forward as far as Vienna, but then with
drew to Hungary, The conquering invaders had only for a
short time pushed beyond the territories whose natural con
ditions and features resembled those of their homeland. The
death of Ogotai, the Great Khan, far away in Eastern Asia,
ended the danger.
The news of these events spread like wildfire throughout
Europe, whidht conceived a new attack imminent. Minor
quarrels were forgotten in face of the graver danger and the
whole of Germany united— the last time for centuries. King
Conrad held a Diet at Esslingen in May 1241 and proclaimed
a Landpeace, preached a Crusade against the Tartars and took
the Cross himself, stipulating only that this involved him in no
obligations towards the Pope but only in a campaign against
the foe. Otherwise the papalists would have led the Crusaders,
as was now their habit, against the Emperor.
The news of Liegnitz must have reached Frederick in May,
just as he was advancing on Rome from Faenza. King Bela
of Hungary in his need offered Emperor Frederick suzerainty
over all his lands if he would free them from the Mongol threat.
This alluring offer was not needed to summon Frederick to the
North East battlefields. He might have become in very deed
the saviour of Europe in this year of grace 1241— King of the
West he had himself united. His manifestos, masterpieces of
the imperial Chancery, were despatched to all the Kings and
great ones of the earth. The Christ-like Imperator, throned
above the clouds, sounded the blasts of his trumpet to rally
554 MONGOL HABITS vm
" powerful imperial Europe " against the foe before whose
victorious eagles the pride of the Dragon should be laid low
and the Tartar hurled to Tartarus. Each and every nation
should despatch with speed her chivalry to fight under the two
standards of Europe, the imperial eagles and the banner of the
Cross : Germany fiery and furious in arms, France the mother
and nurse of chivalry, Spain valiant and warlike, England fertile
in men and ships, Allemania full of daring warriors, Dacia
strong on the sea, untamed Italy and Burgundy unacquainted
with peace, restless Apulia with her Adriatic and Tyrrhenian
and Greek islands of unconquered sailor-folk, Crete, Cyprus,
Sicily, bloodstained Hibernia with lands and islands ocean-
bound, quick Wales and marshy Scotland, icy Norway, and
every noble and renowned land under the Western sky,
Had Frederick hastened north he would have stilled the
voices which were murmuring everywhere, that he himself had
called the Dragon forth, lusting by the aid of Tartarean allies
to make himself Dominus Mundi, and to destroy like Lucifer
the Christian faith. These rumbling murmurs were doubtless
strengthened by the intimate knowledge of Mongolian habits
and customs displayed in the manifestos. Frederick II had
probably made it his business, with eager curiosity, to acquire
all the information he could about these unknown Mongols, a
people " whose origin and first home we do not know," who
were fabled to have lived hidden beyond the seven climates under
burning sun. They are described with ethnographic exactness,
not without an implicit side-glance at the Emperor himself,
"A wild people are they and lawless and without ruth, but
they have a lord whom they follow and whom they obey, and
whom they honour and whom they call Lord of the Earth.
The bodily frame of this man is small and undersized, but
powerful, broadshouldered, hardy and enduring. Stout of
heart and courageous they plunge into any danger at a sign
from their leader. Their face is broad, their gaze is sinister,
they utter a terrifying cry that is like their heart. They wear
untanned hides of oxen, horses and asses. Into these they
stitch sheets of iron and use them as armour, or have heretofore
done so. Alas, they now bear handsomer and better weapons
from the spoils of conquered Christians. These Tartars are
BITTER MEMORIES 555
incomparable archers, and have ingeniously inflated skins in
which they swim across lakes and flooded rivers. The horses
they have brought with them are said to be content with roots
and leaves and bark when other fodder fails, and yet they are
swift and, at need, long-enduring." Thus writes the Emperor
of their customs, and he counsels his correspondents to avoid
open battle, to provision their fortresses and to arm their
people. But he did not himself set out against the Mongols.
The unity which Frederick so strongly recommended to the
peoples of Europe he was unable to attain in his own Empire.
Even the Mongol peril brought no peace with the Church ;
and as long as the war with Pope Gregory lasted he dared not
quit Italy, especially as on all sides he was now victorious.
His previous experience had been too bitter. " The painful
memory of ancient days recurs : once of old we sailed to the
rescue of the Holy Land and the destruction of the Saracens,
who were no less persecutors of our religion than the Tartars
of to-day, and while we were thus active beyond the sea our
beloved Father, having raised troops amongst the Milanese and
their allies, subjects all of our Empire, broke forcibly into our
kingdom of Sicily and by the mouth of his legates forbade all
followers of Christ to help us in the cause of the Crucified."
The Emperor was within sight of final success, he dared not
imperil the harvest of years unless Pope Gregory, whether
voluntarily, or under compulsion, would consent to peace. The
Pope was unmoved by the crisis ; since the capture of the
prelates he was less than ever inclined to make peace. The
imperial despatches kept the world informed that only the
Pope's lust for strife prevented Frederick from taking an active
part in the campaign against the Mongols.
The Pope's behaviour in other affairs was no less ambiguous.
Frederick II designated his supporters as " faithful Christians "
and the papalists as heretics whose " heresiarch " was Gregory
IX. Other events justified his terminology : the state of
affairs in the Holy Land.
Frederick had previously declared that there could be no
thought of a new crusade till the expiration of the ten-year
556 PAPAL OBSTRUCTION vm
truce : that is not before 1239. I*1 March 1239 he was ex
communicated by Pope Gregory amongst other reasons because
his Lombard war was making a crusade to the glory of the
Redeemer impossible. The Crusaders were summoned to
meet at Lyons in this same March, and numbers duly assembled
there under the leadership of the King of Navarre. Suddenly
a papal messenger arrived, forbade the Crusade for this year,
ordered the pilgrims to return home, and fixed the start for
March 1240. The journey was to be made not to Jerusalem
but to Constantinople to bolster up the Latin Empire, a papal
creation, of which Baldwin II of Flanders was now Emperor.
The disobedient were threatened with spiritual penalties. The
luckless Crusaders who had equipped themselves by the sale or
mortgage of their possessions felt themselves befooled, and were
so enraged that they nearly attacked the messenger. They did
not know where to turn. The Emperor came to their relief.
It seemed that the Curia was determined on principle to
permit no crusade to Syria, and did not abandon this attitude
as long as Frederick lived. A little later the papal legates in
Germany went so far as to excommunicate all who entertained
even the idea of crusading against the Saracens or the heathen
of Prussia. In England, likewise, the Curia sought to prevent
a crusade to Palestine, It was perfectly obvious that the Pope
was bent on wrecking the crusade he had begun by proclaim
ing. His motives were clear. In the previous year he had
concluded an offensive alliance with Venice and Genoa against
the Emperor. Both these maritime towns had interests in the
Holy Land and both were at war with the Emperor, A crusade
against Syria would have strengthened Frederick's position in
Jerusalem, which was none too secure, just at a moment when
Venice and Genoa were hoping to drive him out of all his
territories, including Sicily. It would, therefore, have stultified
Pope Gregory's whole policy : hence the crusade must be
abandoned, even though the Holy Land should thus be lost not
only to Frederick but to Christendom. The same indulgences
could lure the crusaders to war with Frederick in Italy. It is
said that when Frederick captured rebels fighting against him
and wearing the sign of the Cross that he forthwith crucified
them so that they might realise the meaning of the symbol.
I24o LOSS OF JERUSALEM 557
This may be untrue, but Frederick would have been quite
capable of it and would have held that the responsibility fell
on the Pope, who was misusing Crusaders for his own ends.
Frederick had again and again deprecated a campaign against
Syria till he should be free to lead the crusade, from which
only the quarrel with Pope Gregory was detaining him. And
the crusaders well knew that without the Emperor they would
be " as sand without lime or a wall without mortar." Never
theless he put no obstacles in their way and helped them where
he could. He urged them to travel by way of Sicily, where
they would find shipping facilities, and he gave immediate
instructions to his Sicilian officials to look after the pilgrims,
many of whom had to winter in Sicily waiting for the new date
proposed. The imperial marshal in Syria, Richard Filangieri,
received the necessary instructions. In the spring of 1240 the
pilgrims set forth for Syria, where, as was to be expected, they
increased the existing confusion. The lack of a common leader,
the proverbial disunion of Christians in the Holy Land, the
untrustworthiness of the Knights of St. John and of the Temple,
contributed to a severe defeat in November 1240, which was
immediately followed by the conquest of Jerusalem by the
Muslim prince of Kerak,
Frederick II was encamped before Facnza. He bestirred
himself to salvage what he could. He hastened to get into
touch with the Sultans of Damascus and Egypt and to negotiate
at least the release of the prisoners. He despatched his Sicilian
captain Roger de Amicis to Egypt to conclude a treaty with
the Sultan Malik Salih, the son of al KamiL For al Kamil had
died in 1238, deeply mourned by Frederick, who wrote to the
English king : " Many things would have been very different
in the Holy Land if only my friend al Kamil had been still
alive." England was to espouse his cause in the East, Despite
the Pope the Emperor's brother-in-law, Richard Earl of Corn
wall, sailed to Palestine with the English pilgrims. Frederick
provided him with plenary powers and instructions, and he
succeeded, thanks to dissensions no less acute in the Saracen
ranks, in renewing the truce and in recovering- Jerusalem for
the Emperor and for Christendom. In the eyes of the world
Frederick was once more the protector of the Holy Land and
558 ADVANCE ON ROME vm
Pope Gregory its destroyer, and the pamphlets of the time
openly express this view.
Meantime, in the face of the Mongol peril, Frederick had
been striving to reach an understanding with the Pope. When
this failed he invaded the Papal States to compel the Pope by
force to make peace. When the Earl of Cornwall returned
from the Holy Land negotiations seemed possible once more.
He landed in Trani in July 1241, met the Emperor and betook
himself to Rome with full credentials to act as mediator.
Frederick had no hope of success, but the Englishman would
not be dissuaded. After a short time he returned empty-
handed, and much annoyed by the stiff-necked obstinacy of the
Bishop of Rome. Richard of Cornwall, not improbably, met
Count Rudolf of Hapsburg at the Emperor's court on this
occasion. If so it was a remarkable rencontre ; for these two
noblemen were later the two chosen successors of Frederick II
in the tarnished splendour of the Roman throne.
Frederick now gathered all his strength for a final thrust
against Rome. His prospects were on the whole better than
last year ; the Pope's position was hopeless. To add to his
misfortunes, one of his cardinals, John of Colonna, had openly
deserted to the Emperor and was prepared now to take arms
against the Pope, of whose policy he had long disapproved.
While Colonna's adherents in Rome fortified themselves in
their towers and palaces, the Baths of Constantine and the
Mausoleum of Augustus, against the papalists, who at the
moment had the upper hand in the city, the cardinal betook
himself to Palestine, and besieged several positions in the
Emperor's name. Frederick hastened to comply with his call
to join him. The Emperor wrote to the cardinal that he had
at first been surprised to find in him an upholder of plans for
renewing the Imperium, No cardinal and no priest had pre
viously given such encouragement to the Eques and Imperator
of the Romans, and he attributed this " to the noble anxiety
of a noble race and the fire of noble blood." It proved to be
the fact that in many particulars the Colonna were the inheritors
of Frederick II's plans for the rebirth of Rome.
i24i GREGORY'S LAST CARD 559
Nothing now lay between the Emperor and his longed-for
Roman triumph. He had now determined, whatever might
be the outcome, to use open force against the Pope, and he had
no lack of fighting strength. In June he had captured Terni
and then lay before Rieti, and was now advancing nearer to
Rome itself. In August Tivoli opened its gates to him, and
his troops were laying waste the country up to the walls of
Rome. Frederick was already comparing himself to the
" Libyan Hannibal " before the gates of Rome. By the middle
of August his headquarters were in Grottaferrata, nine miles
south of Rome. Piero della Vigna wrote " the path of peace
which base obstinacy has hitherto kept closed will now be
opened by the pressure of the Pope's advancing enemies. "
At this moment, when Frederick was about to strike the final
blow, news came from Rome that Pope Gregory IX was dead*
The Pope had for the second time snatched the certain con
quest of Rome from the hand of his hated foe : Frederick's
sword a second time smote empty air. Pope Gregory had
played his last card. No enemy was left, for the Emperor
was fighting neither Church, nor Pope, nor Rome, but only
Gregory : and Gregory was dead.
The Pope's advanced age had long since made his death a
contingency to be reckoned with. The fever-laden air and the
burning heat of a Roman August, and the impossibility of
seeking healing in the baths of Viterbo or elsewhere, may have
hastened the end. There were some who did not hesitate to
dub Frederick the murderer of Gregory, and others who said
the Pope had died " unable to bear the sorrow he had brought
upon himself." Just as the Pope refused till the last moment
to grant peace to the foe, so Frederick's hate against this
" disturber of the world's peace " lasted beyond the grave,
" And so he who refused to make peace or to treat of peace,
who took upon himself to challenge Augustus, was fated to fall
a prey to the avenger August. And now is dead indeed 1
Through him the earth lacked peace, the strife was great and
how many perished ! "
Such was Frederick's epitaph on his dead foe. He had
little cause to feel magnanimous towards Gregory IX, who
had persecuted him till his last breath as the " Beast of the
560 TWO GREAT FOES vm
Apocalypse/' One of the Pope's last letters had been directed
to the prelates imprisoned through his fault, bidding them take
courage though they languished in the hands of Pharaoh, of the
snare-devising Satan. His very last conjured the Genoese " to
arise with the might of their galleys, and avenge the new in
justice which the Church was suffering.'' Hate was Gregory's
greatness and he hated to the end, though it seemed as if his
hate might wreck the Church. Frederick returned his hate.
During the fourteen-year war in which the two monarchs strove
each with every nerve to wrest the world-crown from the other
they had both grown in stature. These deadly enemies were
the incarnation of two hostile worlds who in each encounter
outvied and re-outvied each other. Gregory IX was never
so great as in his last years, and Frederick II would never
have attained the heights he did without his abysmal hatred
of the Pope. Nothing less than Gregory's double power, as
Caesar-Pope and disciple of St. Francis, would have compelled
Frederick to put forth his utmost effort. Even in his age we
can only picture Gregory with eyes flashing in the passion of
unbridled wrath, and yet this savage obstinate old man was
attuned to the sublime ecstasy and mystic rapture of St,
Francis. As an aged man he wrote beautiful hymns in praise
of his friend, in one of which he celebrates Francis as the
Archangel Michael who slays the mighty dragon. Both as
St. Francis' friend and as the papal politician of the decretals,
Gregory was bound to consider Frederick II as the dragon
whom the Devil had sent to the confusion of the Christian
world. The weapons Gregory used had little resemblance to
those of St. Francis, nor was he destined to become the papa
angelicus for whom the world was waiting. The fact that
Gregory wielded the " dragon weapon " transformed Frederick
in the eyes of the world into a " saint," and Frederick, stung by
the power of such a hate, had Gregory to thank for his elevation.
The death of Gregory brought relief from intense strain,
Frederick II abandoned his attack on Rome and marched into
Sicily, which he scarcely quitted again for the next two years.
He had no remaining enemy, but neither was there any Pope
to release him from the ban. For two and twenty months the
orphaned chair of St. Peter remained empty and no absolution
DOMINUS MUNDI 56*
was possible. No warlike events demanded Frederick's pre
sence in Italy. People always feel respect for well-proved force,
and the capture of Faenza, the victory at sea, the conquest of
a further part of the Patrirnonium had all had an intimidating
effect. Finally, Gregory's death had produced cairn. King
Enzio was able to hold the Lombards in check, and the im
perial fleet inflicted injury on Genoa's trade. A strange repose
brooded over Italy, From his Apulian castles Frederick watched
events. Without the Pope the Emperor was sole Lord of the
West, in very fact the Dominus Mundi.
As such he needed to find a responsive world. The imperial
mantle with its heavy folds, embroidered with the symbols of the
Macrocosm, was no mere ornamental robe, accidental perhaps,
or even burdensome. Being what he was and honoured as
he was, he might have been lord of a few hundred acres
and yet he would have dominated the world. Everything,
from the conception of a re-birth of Rome down to Sicilian
sculpture, was interwoven with the Empire and the Emperor :
" Our influence is felt to the remotest corners of the earth. . . ."
The suzerainty of the Macrocosm is in its nature spiritual.
Frederick's task was now to translate into reality this spiritual
overlordship.
The conception of a spiritual overlordship is a commonplace
in the ages of the Church, though it may seem strange in rela
tion to an Emperor. Frederick II had been the ward and pupil
of the great Innocent, founder of the Church as a State. He
was an intellectual man, and we need not wonder to find in
his conception of Empire a reflection of the Church. The
whole Italian- Sicilian State which the Popes coveted as their
Patrimony of Peter became as it were the Patrimony of
Augustus for this gifted monarch, who sought to release the
secular and intellectual powers that were fused into the spiritual
unity of the Church and to build a new empire based on these.
The Popes with their encyclicals summoned the whole of
Christendom to arms, and now Frederick II with his circulars
stirred the whole Roman world to battle with the Pope, The
priesthood had laid claim to men or money from the kings, but
562 ATTITUDE TO KINGS vm
Frederick begged rather the moral backing of the European
rulers against the clergy. Each of the opposing powers,
Empire and Papacy, sought what it needed to complete itself,
no longer representing moon and sun, but the " two suns " that
Dante styled them. The empire of the sword, however, was
uplifted by becoming an intellectual State, while the Church
degraded herself by " secularisation." The Hohenstaufen
sought to rouse and rally round him all the statesmanlike
instincts of his fellow-kings against the ever-spreading organi
sation of a world-church, to lead the Empire to battle as a
spiritual, not as a political unity. Such was the sum of all
Frederick's communications to the Christian kings of Europe.
Up till about 1236 Frederick's relations with the Christian
rulers of the West had been confined to casual interchanges.
The first excommunication and the Crusade, events which
touched the whole of Christendom, made the Christian kings
appear to form a sort of forum. When Frederick took rank as
a world ruler by entering on the Lombard war his relation to
the kings of Europe assumed another colour. Active diplo
matic exchanges took place between the imperial and the various
royal courts, a regular interchange of news concerning the most
diverse affairs became established, imperial envoys often re
mained a considerable time at foreign courts, and Frederick
could count on the sympathy of the kings in his actions and in
his plans ; for what concerned the Emperor of the West now
concerned also the western kings. The theatre was enlarged
and all the world was touched by whatever happened in
the imperial sphere.
Frederick did not cultivate " foreign politics." He would
not have recognised their existence. For him there was one
" Europa imperialist' one res publica universae christianitatis ,
one Imperium Romanum embracing the whole of Christendom.
He held himself aloof from all quarrels of the kings amongst
themselves. England distrusted him when with the help of
France he won the Empire at the battle of Bouvines. France
distrusted him when he married the Englishwoman. They
were both unjust. Not that he observed " neutrality " ; this
idea also was foreign to him. As Roman Emperor he had a
super-national character which he prudently would not forego.
EMPIRE SUPER-NATIONAL 5^3
England offered him an alliance which he steadfastly refused.
It would have been treachery to the still-valid conception of a
universal empire to form an alliance with one of the European
kings. It would also have been unwise, for a counter-alliance
would inevitably have followed, and the world which should be
one would have split in twain. An alliance would have been
to fling away the Empire and descend to the level of a territorial
king of Germany, Italy and Sicily, as inevitably happened with
the later Emperors, even Charles V. Frederick IFs task was
rather that of Dante's Emperor : to command sufficiently
superior force to preserve peace and with it the unity of Europe.
Such ideas were powerful in an age in which the idea carried
as much weight as the fact, or more. The feeling never arose
that there was a discrepancy between the Empire as a divine
world-embracing institution and the actual imperial territory
of political realities.
For Frederick and for the world at large the hegemony of
the Roman Emperor was a matter of course : suzerainty and
leadership, but not by any means the exercise of ruling power.
All his contemporaries, kings included, acknowledged the
imperial superiority, but they would all have instantly and
vigorously repulsed any attempt by him to interfere in the life
of their states. The Emperor could issue no orders to the
kings of Europe, in which his position was inferior to the Pope's,
as a chronicler has shrewdly remarked who puts these words
into the Emperor's mouth apropos of the Council : " The Pope
is my inveterate foe and open enemy, and he moreover has the
power to deprive any man of his dignity who opposes him, and
even to fetter the deposed person with the bonds of his curse,
and to hurl him into the abyss of yet more terrible punishment.
Our position is endangered, the position of the Emperor is
that of all the princes, and I alone stand as the champion of all,
The kings of the earth and the princes whose cause I defend,
who have made me their counsellor and representative, would
not answer my summons nor obey my command. They are
not my subjects that I could compel them or could punish the
disobedient. "
The earlier Hohenstaufens had, indeed, attempted to compel
the kings to obedience, Barbarossa called his fellow-monarchs
564 REBEL AND PRIEST vm
" heads of provinces," Henry VI considered them his vassals,
and both sought to trample on the petty kings to augment
thereby their own greatness. Things had changed by
Frederick's time : the " nations " had come to birth, and the
stronger national feeling grew in the western dominions, the
more difficult it became to maintain at all a universal empire :
even in the abstract. If Frederick II had shown hostility to
the national impulses and sought to limit the independence of
the kings, he would infallibly have come to grief and had the
royal pack at his heels as well as the Pope. He had to take
another line if he was to bridge the gulf implied in the challenge :
a Roman Empire and yet nations.
Frederick's policy towards the kings was not unlike that
which he pursued towards the German princes or the Roman
citizens : instead of swimming against a powerful living current
he sought to turn it to account, to let it sweep him on to
greater greatness. Far from suggesting, as his forefathers had
done, that the western kings should sacrifice their national
independence on the altar of a universal empire, Frederick used
his most eloquent manifestos to adjure them jealously to guard
their independence, their nations and their separate states, not
against the Emperor, who " filled with highest happiness and
content with his own lot, envies the life of none," but in co
operation with the Emperor to defend them against the two
enemies of all kings and of all states : the rebel and the priest.
A common cause against the attacks made by rebels and by
clerics on the majesty of the State is the beginning and the end
of all the political relations of Frederick with the kings of
Europe. Instead of trampling on the kings Frederick sought
to enhance their self-consciousness. He considered them as,
like himself, immediate under God. He sought to enlist them
in the same cause and be himself merely their leader, their
counsellor, their champion. This solved the question of
peace amongst the kings themselves. By compelling them
continually to keep their minds on world-questions which
equally affected all, he left them no opportunity for strife, so
that apart from a peripheral quarrel, even the eternal war
between England and France was laid for a time to rest. " By
God, most well-beloved brother," he wrote to the King of
SODALITY OF KINGS 565
England, who was despatching money to the Curia, u let not
such procedure take place, least of all against us, that monarchs
should voluntarily fight against monarchs. Let not the yoke
of papal authority press so heavily on the neck of kings ! "
Frederick rallied the kings against the common foe : first
against the rebels who threatened monarchy itself ; next
against the Pope, who was in league with the rebels and under
mined the independence of the secular power, even challeng
ing secular by spiritual jurisdiction. There was no western
ruler who was not entangled in similar conflict with his church
and with the Roman Curia, none who had not to protect
himself against similar encroachments on his royal power.
The question of lordship in Italy merely provoked the quarrel
earlier and more fiercely between Frederick II and the Pope,
" All of us kings and princes, especially those of us who are
jealous for the true religion and the true faith, suffer from the
open and secret hate of our peoples, and the special but secret
strife with the princes of our Church. For our peoples hunger
to abuse this pestilential freedom, but the priests misuse our
benevolence to injure us in our possessions and in our privi
leges." Hence Emperor and king had the same interests to
defend, and all the monarchs should form a " sodality " under
imperial leadership. If Frederick had insisted on claiming
imperial power and titles he would have accomplished nothing,
and assuredly have awakened resistance. On the path he chose
he achieved much. He had flung a new idea to the dynasts ;
the corporate unity of kings. The echo of the ancient Roman
Imperium was still clearly to be heard and lent breadth and
meaning and cohesion to the idea. This community of kings
was something new, non-hieratic, non-feudal, independent of
force, firmly based on the common secular interests of the
State and on the ever-growing national power and conscious
ness. This separate power of the several nations might prove
the ideal cement for a super-national Empire— or its solvent.
Universal monarchy was almost on its deathbed, but Frederick
II at the beginning of the thirteenth century was able to give
it again, for the last time, a short new lease of life, a complete,
practical and genuine raison d*£tre> by converting it into a volun
tary co-operation. He could only succeed by emphasising the
566 PAPAL ENCROACHMENT vm
contrast between Church and State and rallying all secular
forces to his banner.
Frederick took his stand on this commonwealth of western
kings, and strove to bind them together into a royal corporation.
An insult to the Emperor was an insult to his fellow-monarchs.
" Hasten with water to your homes when fire flames in your
neighbour's house . . , fear the same danger in your own
affairs. The humiliation of other kings and princes will be a
little thing, if the power of the Roman Caesar whose shield
bears the brunt of the first onslaught should crumble under
perpetual attack. . . . We conjure you, nobles and princes of
the earth, and cry you the alarm, not because our own weapons
are unavailing to ward off such shame, but that the whole world
may know that the honour of all is touched when insult is
offered to any one of the guild of secular princes. "
As Germany had her " Illustrious Body of the Holy Empire "
Frederick saw the ideal Imperium as a corpus saecularium
principum under the leadership of the Emperor — a Corpus
which he was the first to call to life. He thus set himself to
awaken the non-ecclesiastical but spiritual instincts of the west
and (as he had done on a smaller scale in Sicily) to marshal
them as one universal whole against the Church. Again and
again he utters his warning cry, " the aifairs of the secular power
should not be subordinated to the Church," and explains that
that is why he prevents the papal Council which was intended
to decide the Lombard question. His theory that with the fall
of the Emperor, the head of all, the whole world would fall, was
quite in tune with the mental atmosphere of the time. " They
begin with us, but be assured of this they will end with the
other princes and kings whose might they will no longer fear
when once we are overcome. Defend therefore your own
rights in defending ours." He summons the kings to vigorous
resistance, for the Pope is bent on subduing to himself all the
dominions of the faithful.
Such exhortation was by no means unjustified. Pope
Gregory's successor, Innocent IV, met with some resistance in
France, Aragon and England, and is said, " with rollings of the
eyes and curlings of the nostril," to have thus addressed the
messengers of England. " It is better for us to make a treaty
PRIESTLY ARROGANCE 567
with your prince to crush these recalcitrant kinglets. When
once we have quelled or destroyed the great Dragon the petty
snakes will easily be trodden under foot."
The world feared some such treatment by the Pope if the
mighty Emperor Frederick were once laid low. The Curia
would boast : •" We have trampled on the great Frederick, and
who then art thou that thou dare hope to resist us ? " If the
Pope acted thus the fault lay with the kings themselves and with
them alone. The Emperor's words are menacing : " Neither the
first are we, nor yet the last, whom priestly power opposes and
seeks to hurl from the seats of the mighty. And the fault is yours
who give ear to these hypocrites of holiness whose arrogance
would fain believe that into their gullet all the Jordan floweth."
What the Emperor perceived as the gravest danger, threatened
not indeed by the Church but by the new hierarchy, was the
sacrifice of original loyalties made by the Roman priest. He
writes in wrath to one of the kings : " These who call them
selves priests now turn oppressors, grown fat upon the alms of
the fathers and of the sons. Although they be themselves
the sons of our loyal subjects, yet do they render no reverence
to Emperor nor king when once they are ordained as apostolic
fathers/' Napoleon felt the same bitterness.
Frederick II was the first to feel the fact acutely and express
it freely. With diabolic ingenuity he turned the tables and
challenged the whole conception of spiritual authority. He
wrote to the Christian kings that he considered it base of the
Pope to hinder him, the Emperor, from marching into Lorn-
bar dy, the historic inheritance of the house of Hohenstaufen,
Especially base since the Pope had claimed his imperial help
against the Romans, who owed no allegiance to Gregory's
father, nor to his grandfather, nor to his kin. One argument of
Frederick's in particular carried great weight with the national
nobility of England and of France. A movement of the French
barons against the clergy adopted bodily the Emperor's ideas,
and rebelled particularly against the fact that priests u aforetime
the sons of slaves presume according to canonical precept to
judge free men and the sons of free men," They demanded
that all jurisdiction should be withdrawn from the priests in
favour of the king.
568 PASSIVE RESPONSE vin
Although Frederick II never ceased to emphasise the com
munity of Emperor and kings, he did not fail in his letters duly
to stress the unique and eminent position of the Roman
monarch and the comprehensiveness of the Empire, What
was an individual king beside an Emperor ! A pitiful figure,
standing alone, surrounded by danger on all sides. u Ye single
kings of single countries what have ye not to fear from such a
High Priest who dares to depose us . . . , us, whom God hath
singled out by the imperial diadem, us who mightily hold sway
over illustrious dominions/' The exalted character of the
Imperium is again expressed not less haughtily and clearly.
An English or French bishop who crowns and anoints his king
has thereby acquired no right to depose his king. No greater
right has the Pope to dethrone the Roman Caesar whom he has
anointed and crowned. This sentence sets clearly forth the
difference in status between king and Emperor. Frederick was
fond of describing himself as " geographically nearer in space
and in office more akin " to the Pope than to his fellow-
monarchs.
What was the reaction of the western kings to these theories
of the Emperor ? Though Frederick reiterated his absence of
envy towards the kings they did not wholly trust him. In
England it was considered not impossible that Frederick might
cross the narrow Channel to avenge himself if England resisted
his request and continued her payments to the papal overlord.
In spite of assurances of friendship the King of France was
prepared at any moment to leap to arms to defend his frontiers.
Not till the very last did they consider themselves wholly safe
from possible conquest. Nevertheless, a feeling of fellowship
with the Emperor was strong, as was shown at the outset of the
Lombard War when the kings intervened with the Pope on the
Emperor's behalf, and two years later actually sent auxiliaries
for the campaign against Brescia. On the other hand the idea
of a league of secular monarchs against the Church awakened
little direct response. No active common resistance to the
Pope was organised, though in all countries the aristocracy
sympathised with the Emperor. None of the kings was anxious
SAINT LOUIS 569
wantonly to attack the Church, though each was engaged with
her in open or in secret strife. It was, however, an extra
ordinary triumph of imperial policy that none of the kings
allowed himself to be seduced into alliance with the Pope, none
of them stabbed the Emperor in the back, and none recognised
his excommunication or deposition. Passively the solidarity
of the kings was perfect.
Any sign of partisanship for one side or the other was made
impossible in France by the strict, unerring uprightness of
King Louis IX, known as St. Louis. He was by far the
most important royal contemporary of Frederick II, and one of
the noblest figures in the roll of the kings of France. His
reverence and simple humility made him a saint, but with these
he combined all the knightly pride of a Western Frank, and that
genuine royalty of kingship which left its impress so deeply on
the land of France, down to the days of le Roi Soleil. Germany
was the land of Emperors, and France was the cradle of kings.
The Valois and the Bourbons may well have outshone St. Louis
in royal pomp ; as little more than a boy he had forsaken all
outward show. He was second to none, however, in royal
pride ; and in royal sincerity he outshines most of his suc
cessors. As founder of the Law- State of France he seems to
have learnt more from Frederick II than is generally recognised,
and he had the clear eye of a great man for the problems of
Christendom whose confusions frequently distressed him. As
he lay at nights on his plank bed pondering eternity he never
lost sight of the universal meaning of the western powers, he
was never seduced by expediencies, he never forgot what the
honour of his country demanded.
The importance of St. Louis lies in this : that at a time when
Christian chivalry was beginning to crumble and peter out in
the petty and the commonplace, this Prankish king sot her to
new and universal tasks, inflamed the torpid for the last great
Crusade with the same fire and enthusiasm as he brought to
conquer his own bodily weakness, which was never allowed to
deter him from midnight prayers or matins. The world saw
in him something of the spirit of the early Templars : a com
bination of pride, humility and joy in work, transfigured by the
same faith. A generation later this Order was abolished ; its
5?o HENRY PLANTAGENET vm
degeneration had caused him bitter sorrow. The last symbol
of its greatness perished with St. Louis off the Tunisian coast.
On a royal plane St. Louis had the same significance for
Frederick that the German Grand Master, Hermann of Salza,
had had on the more modest stage of earlier days. As all-
Christian King, Louis IX was the God-given peacemaker
between two warring powers, Empire and Papacy ; for a
decade he strove indefatigably to fulfil his task. His failure
brought him grief, for his dream of freeing again the Holy Land
was shipwrecked on the arrogant obstinacy of the Curia. Yet
with strict impartiality he rendered unto the Pope the things
that were the Pope's and unto Caesar the things that were
Caesar's. He permitted the proclamation in France of Frede
rick's excommunication, but forbade all armed assistance for
the Pope, and he threatened to confiscate the goods of the
Church when he found his clergy raising money in France for
the war against Frederick. The French prelates who were
setting out to attend the Pope's Council seem to have been for
bidden to undertake anything against Frederick II, even if
Gregory should demand it. On the other hand he wrathfully
resented the Emperor's retention o'f French clerics in his
prisons. " The kingdom of the Franks is not so weak that it
is wise to goad it with the spur," thus he writes to Frederick.
As confidant of both parties he was ready to fly to arms against
either, if either sought to lure him from his neutrality. He
succeeded in preventing a decisive predominance of either Pope
or Emperor.
Beside King Louis the other kings make a poor showing.
King Henry III of England is, in comparison, characterless and
poor-spirited. He was a puppet, unable to hold his own with
Emperor, Pope or peers. Beyond other kings he had ties to
each of these powers : the Emperor was his brother-in-law,
the Pope his feudal overlord, and the peers took their stand on
Magna Charta. Cowardly and undecided, Henry agreed with
whoever at the moment happened to be his interlocutor. His
phrase " I do not wish to contradict the Pope in anything : I dare
not," might mutatis mutandis equally apply to Emperor or barons.
On occasion he gave in to the Emperor when Frederick, sup
ported by the peers and their spokesman Richard of Cornwall,
ROYAL BLOOD 571
demanded that he should refuse the papal tribute. For Henry
III, to the indignation of many of his subjects, had permitted
the Pope to raise money levies, and had allowed the country
to be mercilessly exploited, besides thus supplying the Pope
with money for his war and indirectly injuring the Emperor.
Under pressure from Frederick and the barons he defied the
Curia for a little while, Henry of England and Sancho II of
Portugal, whom the Pope had deposed, supplied the Emperor
with two classic instances of the way in which Roman priests
sought to suppress the secular royal power. He constantly
pointed out to the other kings how dearly England paid for her
subjection to the priest,
The corpus saecularium prindpum under the Emperor's
leadership was entirely a creation of Frederick IFs, and a com
pletely new way of conceiving the world as a sort of corporate
State. The conditions precedent for this were a very con
siderable independence of the individual kings on the one hand,
and on the other the emancipation of the secular state from the
Church, an emancipation which had everywhere begun to set
in. By striving to kindle this corporate spirit in the kings,
which was everywhere in evidence in Europe, Frederick was
taking the only line by which the maintenance of a world
monarchy was possible. When we dream to-day that we have
approached nearer to a community of equal nations, such as
Frederick II and Dante had in mind, let us not forget that the
bond that then united them was the dignity and nobility and
supremacy of the worthiest among them.
Amongst the elements which the western monarchs had in
common, their royalty, their intellect, their secularity, Frederick
laid stress on another common tie, valid until very recent times :
their common blood. This was another bond which Frederick
valued highly, the more because it lay outside the Church.
Frederick liked to boast that he was connected by descent or
by marriage with almost all the royal houses of Europe.
Hohenstaufen blood was almost synonymous with imperial
blood. People had ceased to look for the scion of another
house fitted to wear the imperial diadem. For Frederick was,
572 AN EMPIRE BREED vm
in fact, the fifth of his family to reign as Emperor in this elective
kingdom, and the succession of Conrad, his son, the sixth, was
well assured.
Frederick, therefore, treated the royal houses of Europe as
one great princely family, within whose circle, however, the
Hohenstaufen was the imperial branch, the " Empire breed "
as Manfred called it. A special virtue resided in the race, and
to their offspring it was given " to know the mysteries of
the kingdom of God . . , but to the others only in parables."
" What German, what Spaniard, what Englishman, what
Frenchman, what Proven?al, what man of whatever nation or
tongue, could, without our will rule over thee, 0 Rome, or to
thy glory exercise the imperial office ? The inexorable neces
sity of the Universe replies : None, save the son of the greatest
Caesar whose gifts, inborn in his imperial blood, ensure him
force and fortune."
These words of Manfred's clearly indicate the new line of
thought that Frederick had initiated. The Hohenstaufens rule
the world not as the old Germanic, Prankish, royal stock— what
weight could that carry in England or France, in Spain or
Hungary ? In the person of Frederick II the regia stirps of the
Waiblings had become the stirps caesarea, the imperial race of
Rome ! The divine stock of the Roman Caesars appears once
more in the Hohenstaufen, " the heaven-born race of the God
Augustus, whose star is unquenched for ever," a race which
springs from Aeneas, the father of the Roman people, and
descends through Caesar to Frederick and his offspring in
direct descent. All members of this imperial race are called
divine. The predecessors on the imperial throne are dim and
the living no less, finally all members of the Hohenstaufen
family. By a coincidence King Conrad from the very day of
Cortenuova drew up his documents as " Conrad, son of the
divine Frederick, the exalted Emperor, chosen by God's Grace
King of the Romans, " whereas before he had styled himself
simply, " Conrad, son of the glorious and exalted Frederick."
Frederick's own letter to Jesi, his reference to the divine
imperial mother in Bethlehem of the March had an almost
embarrassingly definite ring about it, and he addressed his son
Conrad as a " divine scion of the imperial blood." Decades
AN HOUSE ACCURSED 573
after Frederick's death the Margrave of Meissen, who had
married the Hohenstaufen princess, Margaret, Frederick's
daughter, was flattered as the " father of divine children."
Even at the end of the century a daughter of Ottocar II of
Bohemia was celebrated as " an offshoot of the divine blood "
whom fortunate Bohemia had begotten, because Ottocar's
mother had been a daughter of Philip of Swabia, and another
great grandmother had been " of the race of the Roman Gods."
So deeply rooted was this deification of the Hohenstaufens in
Italy that Boccaccio, arch-Guelf that he was, lodged a protest
against the prevailing assumption that the imperial Hohen
staufen race was the noblest that ever breathed. The " blood
of Barbarians," he contended, could never exceed in worth the
matter which Nature had used to shape the Italian !
The imperial office had been held divine by Barbarossa ;
now gradually not only Frederick's person but the Hohen
staufen race and the Hohenstaufen blood was Caesarean and
divine. Yet one half-century of Staufen rule, the longed-for
THIRD FREDERICK whom the Sibyls had foretold, and the West
would have seen the God Augustus marching in the flesh
through the gates of Rome, would have burnt incense on his
altars and offered sacrifice. In the Hohenstaufens the son of
God had appeared for the last time on earth.
The Roman Curia was right that she dare neither slumber
nor sleep till this accursed race had been exterminated down to
the last bastard of the second and third generation. For the
Church recognised the Staufen as a race apart in whom a
mysterious intangible power resided, a race of priest-haters and
priest-persecutors, a house on whom the Church's ban rested
for all time. Each separate member was equally accursed, not
for his personal guilt but for the crime of belonging to the
" tribe of the ungodly " ! " Destroy ye name and fame, body
and soul, seed and sapling of the Babylonian ! " was for decades
the battlecry of the vengeful, hate-haunted priesthood of the
Church of Christ. For the first time since ancient days a curse
was to overshadow a whole house, cruel, unrelenting, terrible,
executed by the priests of a wronged and jealous God. The
priests had no alternative. They were faced by the hubris of
a race, growing from generation to generation more youthful
574 CARDINALS1 CONCLAVE vm
and more beautiful, approaching near and nearer to God and
to the Gods.
A Cardinals ' conclave frequently takes time. An earnest,
solemn assembly of reverend men, meeting in the seclusion of
a luxurious room in some papal palace, to treat in peace con
cerning the person of a new Pope : such is it normally — but
not always. The history of the Roman Church records many
a meeting long-drawn-out and many marked by wild excitement,
but scarce another to compare in savagery with that first real
" Conclave " which took place in 1241.
Rome and the Church were in acute danger at the moment
of Gregory's death. Emperor Frederick was at the gate
" with an army like the Libyan Hannibal " ; the Church lacked
leaders ; two cardinals were in prison since the fight at sea,
Cardinal John Colonna was a deserter in the imperial camp,
the remaining cardinals in Rome were split into two factions :
the stronger peace-party inclining to the Emperor, the weaker
war-party bent on continuing the fight. It was clear that a
unanimous vote was hardly to be hoped for and that the election
business would be protracted. This was little to the liking
of the Senator of Rome. For the safety of Rome and of the
Church he wanted a new Pope chosen with the minimum
delay. The sole Senator of the day was Matthew Orsini, a
papalist whom Gregory IX had helped to power, and who now
ruled Rome like a Dictator. He reflected that uncomfortable
quarters would promote speed, and laid his plans accordingly.
Immediately after the Pope's death Orsini had the cardinals
seized by his myrmidons and dragged to the election like pick
pockets to gaol. Their treatment was harsh enough, the car
dinals were driven along with kicks and blows, one feeble man
was thrown down and dragged by his long white hair over the
sharp stones of the street, so that he arrived all battered and
torn in the council chamber whose doors were closed on him
A CONCLAVE OF TERROR 575
for many weeks. The election room as on previous similar
occasions was in the so-called Septizonium of Septimius Severus
on the Palatine. This had been in its day a fine building with
fountains and waterworks and nymphs > but it was now a ruined
sort of tower which had suffered considerably in recent earth
quakes.
Only one single apartment with a kind of alcove was pkced
at the disposal of the ten cardinals, and the soldiers of the
Senator kept the prelates so strictly in confinement that the
place resembled a prison. The guards accepted large bribes,
but no amount of bribery permitted the entrance of servants
or of doctors, and doctors were sorely needed before long.
The whole building was faulty and the rain dropped through
the fissures in the roof, and not only rain but revolting filth, for
the guards who were quartered at night above the conclave
chamber facetiously used the faulty floor as a latrine. The
cardinals contrived by improvised tents to keep their actual
sleeping quarters reasonably clean and dry, but it is unnecessary
to labour the insanitary conditions and the resultant stench.
Add to this the fever and heat of a Roman August, inadequate
food, lack of medical attendance, and an overbearing soldiery ;
it was not long till almost all ten cardinals fell seriously ill, and
three actually died in consequence of hardship.
The Senator's calculations were so far correct : the cardinals
were anxious to agree as soon as possible on a new Pope and
quit this hell. The difficulties, however, were unusually great.
The peace-party was numerically stronger, but not one of the
other side would allow himself to be converted, and the neces
sary two-thirds majority could not be attained. The result was
a dual-election : five of the peace-cardinafe chose a sixth, one
of their own number, the Milanese Godfrey of Sabina ; three
of the war-cardinals chose a fourth of their party, Romanus of
Porto, a man peculiarly hateful to Frederick.
At this point Frederick intervened. Reviving an ancient
imperial right in cases of indecisive election he rejected
Romanus of Porto and confirmed the election of Godfrey.
The peace party might perhaps have succeeded in winning the
one vote they lacked, but unfortunately one of their number »
the English Robert of Somercote, died in the conclave. The
576 CELESTINE IV vm
conditions attending his death were disgusting, as can well be
imagined. While he was still alive the soldiers flung him into
a corner to die, sang mocking songs at him and spat on him and
left him without medical attention or the rites of the Church.
When the purgatives which he had taken began to act they
dragged him on to the roof, and there in public, in full view of
the Eternal City, the poor man relieved the last necessities of
nature.
The Englishman's death removed the last hope of a two-
thirds majority, and finally all agreed to choose an outsider.
But the Senator Orsini would have none of him. He wanted
to parade the new Pope at once before the Roman people. He
began to storm and rage, and threatened if the choice did not
fall on one of those present he would dig up Pope Gregory's
corpse and put it in the council chamber to complete the misery
of the half-dead cardinals. Further, he would carry the Cross
through the city and massacre every adherent of the imperial
party. The cardinals after what they had already gone through
had no reason to doubt that he was prepared to put these threats
into execution, so at last after two months* deliberation they
decided in favour of the Milanese Godfrey, whom the Emperor
also had supported. He ascended the papal throne as
Celestin IV.
Whatever hopes centred in the name of Celestin, " whom God
himself had sent down from his table in Heaven, " as Frederick
later phrased it, the Pope himself died on the seventeenth day
of his pontificate, before he had even been consecrated. He
had fallen ill at the conclave, and his only act as Pope was an
unsuccessful effort to excommunicate Matthew Orsini.
A new conclave was necessary. The cardinals did not wait.
Terror seized them at the thought of a repetition of what they
had suffered and still were suffering from. Some of them fled
the town and took refuge in AnagnL The three anti-Kaiser
cardinals remained, as well as Cardinal John Colonna whom the
Senator had captured and imprisoned after the close of the
conclave. The feud between Orsini and Colonna continued
thereafter for generations.
THE PRISONER-CARDINALS 577
The College of Cardinals was thus dispersed. Four were in
Rome, four in Anagni, two still in the Emperor's hands. How
could a new Conclave be held ? It was not possible to agree
even on a meeting place. Negotiations on this point dragged
on for months between the Anagni and the Roman group.
Those in Anagni refused emphatically to return to Rome and
those in Rome would not, or could not, on any terms leave the
city. No progress was made, and the fault lay chiefly at the
door of Senator Orsini. The world did not grasp the reason
for the long delay, but noted only the fact that the cardinals
were not choosing a Pope. Abuse began to be heard on
all sides, contemptuous rhymes suggested that the fathers
should toss for the tiara. Another suggested Frederick II as
Pope. Frederick was reproaching the cardinals for not con
cluding the election. In the summer of 1 242 the Emperor even
advanced on Rome ostensibly " to free his friends the car
dinals," for since two of the pro-Kaiser cardinals had died it
was important to Frederick at least to set John Colonna at
liberty again. This demonstration against Rome was without
result, however, and a year later the position was still unchanged.
In these circumstances the Emperor's two prisoner-cardiiials
assumed great importance. The College of Cardinals was not
only scattered but sorely depleted, especially as yet another
cardinal, one of the war party, Romanus of Porto, died of the
consequences of the Conclave of Terror. The two groups of
cardinals in Rome and Anagni joined the prisoners in de
manding their release so that the election might proceed. The
moment had come for Frederick to turn his valuable hostages
to the best account, with practical wisdom and slow deliberation.
One of the captive cardinals, Jacob of Palestrina, was a bitter
enemy. The other, Otto of St. Nicholas, had begun by being
hostile, but Frederick had been so successful in casting his spell
upon him that Otto became, like Cardinal Colonna, an intimate
friend of the Emperor. Negotiations for the release of the
cardinals appear to have begun at the time of the first conclave,
and Frederick was probably willing enough to release Otto of
St. Nicholas on the condition, it is true, that Otto would return
if not himself appointed Pope. These negotiations were now
re-opened, with the result that Frederick brought himself to
578 SINIBALDO FIESCO vm
set Cardinal Otto free, the more readily that Colonna's im
prisonment had left the pro-Kaiser party without a leader.
Otto was now to go and use in the Emperor's favour his in
fluence on the College of Cardinals ; he quitted his prison
richly laden with gifts.
No conclave followed. All through the winter of 1242-3 the
negotiations dragged on. In the spring the Emperor again
undertook a campaign against Rome to waken up the cardinals
there, but abandoned it with speed when they complained that
the imperial troops were blocking the roads and preventing
their joining their colleagues in Anagni. This complaint was
wholly baseless, but Frederick withdrew at once to avoid even
the appearance of interfering with the papal election. From
the same motive he ultimately released Palestrina on receiving
certain assurances from the College.
Matters seemed now beyond measure favourable for the
Emperor. In return for the release of the cardinals—" and
that without ransom " as a chronicler admiringly records —
Frederick was promised the immediate withdrawal of the
Lombard legate Gregory of Montelongo whom he hated.
They had probably also agreed on their choice of a Pope, while
Frederick on his part had promised to restore the Patrimonium
and release the remaining prisoners if a persona grata were
elected. Frederick could anticipate the result of the election
with equanimity. He had, it seemed, played his cards to the
very best advantage. He was, therefore, not at all surprised
to learn that at a brief Conclave at Anagni on June 25th, 1243,
the Genoese Sinibaldo Fiesco, Count of Lavagna, had been
unanimously elected.
Joyfully the Emperor announced a few days later that now
the general peace of the Christian world was assured, the welfare
of the Empire and the friendship between father and son were
guaranteed, since the chosen Pope was one " of the noble sons
of the Empire, and has ever been well-disposed towards us
in word and deed." Frederick ordered thanksgiving services
throughout his Sicilian kingdom and wrote in the same vein
his congratulations to the new Pope, who assumed the name of
Innocent IV : he was a noble scion of the Empire and was now
chosen as a new father to his old friend, and his god^inspired
i243 INNOCENT IV 579
name of Innocent was a pledge of the protection he would accord
to innocence. The noblest representatives of Frederick's
Court, the new German Grand Master, Gerard of Malperg, the
imperial Admiral Ansaldus de Mari, Thaddeus of Suessa, and
Piero della Vigna were despatched as imperial ambassadors to
convey Frederick's congratulations in person to the new Pope.
One of the nobler sons of the Empire ! That the new Pope
was, though the Ficschi could hardly be reckoned among the
pro-imperialist families of Genoa. But Sinibaldo Fiesco who
long ago, after studying and teaching in Bologna, had spent his
early prebendary years in Parma, was intimately related to the
best known partisans of Frederick II. Parma itself was always
an imperialist town of which the Emperor himself was podesta.
Bernard Orlando di Rossi of Parma, a brother-in-law of Pope
Innocent IV, was even a godfather of Frederick's, and might
be accounted a leader of the Ghibelline party. And Sinibaldo
Fiesco's favourite nephew, Hugo Boterius, the son of a sister
who was married in Parma, was devoted to the Emperor in
genuine affection and admiration, till his death and after.
Frederick attached at all times great importance to blood-
related hostages, so that the new Pope's Ghibelline relations
carried great weight with him.
At last Frederick saw a Pope with Ghibelline propensities in
Peter's Chair, and might with some justice consider this man,
whom he himself had chosen , as a personal friend or at least no
enemy. Though not like the Roman Colonna a passionate
partisan of Frederick's, this polished Genoese with his urbane
manners and non-committal courtesy might certainly be
reckoned as one of the friendly cardinals. Warm partisanship
would have been out of character in this citizen of a seaboard
trading town, who weighed in the balance the things of this
world, shrewdly, with heart of ice. In addition, he was one
of the most brilliant jurists of the day, extremely cultured and
the author of a famous commentary on the decretals. In
Frederick's eyes all this was ;n his favour. The Emperor saw
with relief at last a completely unbigoted priest, a man who saw
things naked, as they are, without mysticism or exaggeration,
a man entirely free from passion, ecstasy or fanaticism, a man
the absolute antithesis of Gregory IX, who was fire and passion
58o CONTRAST WITH GREGORY Viu
personified. True, Fiesco lacked also the regal bearing and
gesture, the commanding majesty of Gregory ; he lacked the
dauntless personal courage of that indomitable greybeard. He
was in his own way daring and unscrupulous enough, as a
physical coward often is when he knows his own skin is safe.
The motto of the wily Genoese was eminently expressive :
sedens ago.
It is easy to understand that after a struggle of fourteen
years with Gregory IX, Frederick II should have sought
at all costs to avoid the election of another wild fanatic.
The courteous Cardinal Fiesco, politician rather than priest,
with his worldly interests and free-thinking mind seemed by
contrast a friend. In all this Frederick was right. His terrible
mistake lay in thinking that a sober, intellectual Ghibelline was
less dangerous on the papal throne than a fanatic, that a half-
friend was preferable to a whole-enemy. When he recognised
this, too late, he exclaimed " No Pope can be a Ghibelline ! "
" Woe when the Pope is a Ghibelline ! " would have been
better, for the Pope now wielded the same weapons as Frederick
himself. The Emperor might often have cried, as Napoleon
did of Blucher " He has learnt ! " It might in a sense be true
to say that Innocent IV was Frederick's most remarkable pupil.
From the immensely many-sided achievement of Frederick, the
Pope had broken off merely a single splinter, had copied one
only of the methods of his master's genius, but this with clear
intent he practised and perfected and turned deliberately
against the Hohenstaufen : the concentration of all forces to
one end, unhampered by pity or piety or scruple. Whereas the
Emperor's lack of scruple was wedded to the passion of a creator
building anew world, Innocent IV's was a practical " method,"
coolly devoted to the annihilation of one man, whose existence
threatened to shatter the foundations of an age-old institution.
The one-sided efficiency of the Genoese speedily brought a
kind of anti-climax to the mighty struggle which had raged
between Frederick and Gregory. The fight against the poli
tician Innocent was of a wholly different quality from that
against the priest, and lacked all fruitful mutually-stimulating
A NEW PHASE 581
elements. The struggle was now wholly a mundane one. All
spiritual tension between Emperor and Pope gradually died
out : though some survived between the Emperor and his
adherents. A consequence was that the previous methods of
attack failed Frederick. Other symptoms also indicated that
the quarrel had entered its last phase : Frederick was suddenly
driven into the defensive. His passages of arms with Pope
Gregory had often enough been forced on him, but they always
were fights in a cause where he was willing to fight. His finest
achievements were the product of this duel which brought his
gifts to their full fruition. Now, however, the Emperor found
himself continually in check to his opponent, and driven to
fight a battle which he had not foreseen and did not want. lie
lost enthusiasm and the fighting lost its meaning* lie was no
longer the champion of a given world-order willed by God, but
was spending his strength merely in self-defence. The one
thing he craved was peace ; and peace was the one thing denied*
Frederick's delicate web of diplomacy had accomplished the
forbidden thing and influenced the papal election. He now
saw on the papal throne the cardinal he wanted, whose
Ghibelline relations stood in some measure surety for him. It
does not appear to have struck him just at first that if the Pope
were able to effect a change of atmosphere in Parma these
hostages might prove a Nemesis. Frederick had blunted his
favourite weapons, the intellectual. For the resources of an
individual are more quickly exhausted than those of a system
such as the Papacy. His fantastic faith in himself as Caesar,
in his unchangeably victorious star, in his divine mission, is
now fraught with doom. His faith does not lose its strength,
even though the mission is fulfilled, even though— to quote
Goethe — " Every remarkable man has a certain mission to
fulfil. When it is accomplished he has outlived his usefulness
on earth . . . and the Fates lay for him snare after snare. So
with Napoleon and with many another/'
The name chosen by the new Pope might have given
Frederick more than a hint of the line that Innocent IV was
likely to pursue, but it was long before he allowed himself to
be convinced that Innocent was not the whole-hearted friend
whom he had hoped at all costs to find. Frederick's chief
VIII
582 GAINED AN ENEMY
weapon had broken in his hands : he had not been fighting
against Church or Papacy but against " the unworthiness of the
present Bishop of Rome/' He had perhaps succeeded during
his duel with Gregory IX in convincing the world that this was
so ; he could not hope a second time to distinguish the office
from the office-bearer. If the Pope was not to be the personal
enemy then he must be the personal friend of the* Emperor.
Frederick II flung himself into an imaginary friendship of long
standing with Sinibaldo Fiesco and enthusiastically proclaimed
it to all the world, hoping thus to call a friendship into being.
He wanted to be friends with the new Pope and by sheer force
of will to compel him to goodwill, and doggedly he clung to
the belief that this Genoese would free him from the ban and
give him peace. Even when appearances looked black against
Fiesco the Emperor held to his optimism, and sought the cause
of unsuccessful negotiations everywhere else rather than in lack
of goodwill on the part of this Pope whose election he had
secured. Later, when he realised the full irony of the situation,
he turned against himself the bitter wit that he loved, and
penetratingly remarked that in the Cardinal he had lost a friend
but thereby gained an enemy in the Pope. Without an enemy
a man like Frederick II would have ceased to be.
It seems probable that Pope Innocent at first genuinely
wanted peace. For, as recent events had testified, the war
which had so heavily taxed the Emperor's resources had pressed
even more severely on the Church. A certain amount of pre
liminary negotiation with the cardinals had preceded the papal
election, and discussion was resumed immediately after the
Pope's enthronement. We need only pick out the essential
facts from these wearisome and complicated negotiations.
The first thing to note is the conciliatory spirit of the Em
peror. He made one concession after another to shake off at
last the burden of the ban. It was soon manifest that an
amicable solution would not be easy to find, and the Pope
embarked on a double game. He did not abandon the serious
negotiations, he fought every point with Frederick's envoys,
but at the same time he endeavoured to evade the peace question
NEGOTIATIONS 583
altogether. Frederick had sent to the Pope as his represen
tatives Piero della Vigna and Thaddeus of Sftessa, by far the
most experienced diplomats of his court and skilled in every
variety of subterfuge. With them was associated the indefati
gable and ever-faithful Archbishop Berard of Palermo to hold
a watching brief for the ecclesiastical issues. These three
imperial envoys were released from the ban in order that they
might treat with the Pope, Innocent had rejected Frederick's
proposal that the negotiations should be conducted at the im
perial court ; he knew too well, and feared, the Emperor's
eloquence and his power over men.
A great deal of the business was quickly and easily disposed
of. The Emperor had always recognised the papal authority
in spiritual affairs and acquiesced unconditionally therein. He
declared himself prepared to render any satisfaction to any
degree that the Church might demand : alms, pious founda
tions, even the penance of fasting. When he had received
absolution he was prepared to restore the Church's Patrimony
on condition of himself being the Advocate, in exchange for
which privilege he was ready either to pay interest far exceeding
the actual revenue or to undertake the re-conquest of the Holy
Land at his own expense. This would, however, have been a
new victory for Frederick, and Innocent refused to entertain
the suggestion. In this, as in every agreement between
Emperor and Pope, the most difficult question of all was that
of Lombardy. Frederick took his stand on the indisputable
fact that his excommunication by Gregory IX had nothing to
do with the Lombard question and that his absolution should
not depend on it. Innocent was perfectly aware that the
Emperor's legal position was unassailable and that in any legal
discusssion the Papacy would be the loser. On the other hand
neither he nor any other Pope could afford to sacrifice the
Lombard alliance. Moreover, the Milanese were nervous about
a hasty peace, which was sure to be unfavourable to them, and
Innocent had reassured them by a promise not to negotiate
without them.
Innocent's hands were, in fact, tied by Gregory's agreement
with Venice, Genoa, Piacenza and Milan, that none of the con
tracting parties should conclude a separate peace. The Pope,
584 CARDINAL RAINER vm
therefore, demanded that the Emperor should accord peace
to the whole Christian world, not only to a part. The Emperor
was prepared for this, and after some hesitation announced that
he was anxious not to let all the negotiations be shipwrecked
on this one reef, and that as regarded the Lombards he would
be willing to revert to the situation as it had been at the moment
of his excommunication in 1239. Just as t"1^s concession
seemed about to secure an agreement an event occurred which,
for the moment, interrupted all discussions. The loyal town
of Viterbo suddenly yielded to papal machinations and
deserted the Emperor,
It is quite possible that the defection of Viterbo at this par
ticular moment was not wholly welcome to the Pope. He had
not himself directly brought it about, though he knew what was
going on. The anti-Kaiser cardinals had good reason to dis
trust a peace. Their leader was the fanatic Rainer of Viterbo,
a man of the school of Innocent III and Gregory IX, who hated
Frederick with all the fire and passion of the dead Pope. He
was a soldier by instinct and one of the first cardinals of Rome
to win glory and honour in the field as warrior and general.
The one thing he dreaded was peace. He, therefore, made it
his business so to widen the breach that in future any com
promise with this hated Emperor (whom at one time he had
revered and even loved) should be impossible. He devoted
himself to this task with singleness of heart. Cardinal Rainer
of Viterbo was the cause of all the most grievous breaches of
faith of which the Church was guilty, the author of the most
venomous and malicious pamphlets to which this quarrel gave
birth. He had his way.
With the assistance of some friends he had long intended to
organise a rising of his native town of Viterbo against the
Emperor, though he was by no means unpopular there. Pope
Innocent was not in favour of this scheme, but gave the car
dinal ambiguous powers to work in the Tuscan Patrimonium
for the advantage of the Church. The Pope was thus covered
and yet had avoided a breach with the cardinals, who had grown
somewhat too independent during the papal vacancy. If the
1243 DEFECTION OF VITERBO 585
enterprise were successful it might always be turned to advan
tage. The revolt was successful. The imperial garrison had,
perhaps too precipitately, retreated into the citadel of Viterbo,
where they could hold out for several weeks. The populace
in general looked on indifferently. Those citizens who were
imperial partisans were overcome after heavy fighting.
Frederick was in Melfi when he got the news of the loss of
Viterbo. " He leapt like a lioness robbed of her young or a
she-bear bereft of her cubs. Clothed in the fire of his wrath
he rushed like a midnight tornado to punish the town ; like a
courier for speed he rode, and with no royal pomp. Mounted
on a red horse he came to snatch peace from the earth." Thus
Rainer describes the Emperor's coming. He hastily gathered
an army of Apulians and of his ever-ready Saracens and dashed
to Viterbo. At the same time he sent the alarm to the Vicars
General of the surrounding provinces to bring their town
infantry to his help without delay. He thus got together a fair
army in a short time, but the interval was sufficient to give the
people of Viterbo, egged on by Rainer, opportunity to throw
up strong entrenchments. On a certain Sunday the imperial
forces mustered for the attack. The ever-resourceful Piero
della Vigna helped to organise the troops. The Emperor in
person led one wing against the entrenchments, the second was
commanded by the young Count of Caserta. In spite of spirited
attacks however — the Emperor leaped from his horse and seiz
ing a square shield wrathfully led the charge — the strong town
was not to be taken by storm. Siege machinery had to be
fetched. Some weeks later the attack was renewed at dawn.
In an attempt to employ Greek fire against the fortifications
one of the attacking towers caught fire. The wind, which at
first had been blowing the flames against the town, suddenly
veered, so that the other attacking towers caught fire and were
finally burnt to ashes. This second attempt was, therefore,
unsuccessful.
The Pope chose this moment to resume the negotiations.
He was impelled to this because friends of the Emperor's, the
Count of Toulouse and the Emperor Baldwin of Constantinople,
were working at the papal court for peace, and the Viterbo
question was causing Innocent uneasiness, for it wore an air
586 MASSACRE OF VITERBO vm
of illegality. He, therefore, despatched Cardinal Otto of St.
Nicholas, the Emperor's new and trusty adherent, to Frederick
to come to terms about Viterbo. He was possibly empowered
to offer the Emperor absolution on more favourable terms
if he would abandon his attacks on the town. Frederick had
no wish to embark on a second prolonged siege like Faenza.
Moreover, since Viterbo was situated in papal territory, he
would have to give it up again as soon as he was released from
the ban, and peace now seemed at hand. He quickly came to
terms with his friend Cardinal Otto and agreed to withdraw
into Apulia, stipulating that the half-starved imperial garrison
should be allowed to go free. This agreement was ratified also
by the people of Viterbo on oath. Then the unforgivable
occurred. Cardinal Rainer, haunted by visions of the hated
peace, hounded the citizens of Viterbo against the exhausted
garrison, and as the imperialists sought to leave the city they
were cut down almost to a man, though Cardinal Otto sought
to control the mob and with his own body strove to stay the
slaughter.
Frederick II knew perfectly that Rainer of Viterbo was the
sole culprit. This flagrant breach of the cardinal Js oath shocked
him profoundly : it undermined his faith in all human
statutes. It was not, he wrote to Otto, the massacre of his
people nor the injury to himself that so deeply moved him ; he
must beg to know " What expectations can we have of success
if human good faith is so despised, if all shame is cast aside, if
conscience is powerless, if no respect is paid to the honour of
spiritual fathers ! What bond will hold amongst men ? To
whom can we look for reconciliation in so serious a quarrel, in
which almost the whole world is involved, if the promise of a
holy legate, nay, of a cardinal — a name which should be vener
able amongst the peoples — is suddenly violated ? " The catas
trophe was monstrous. Frederick at first could scarcely realise
it. It was a foretaste of what was yet to come. His wrath
against Rainer and the people of Viterbo was unbounded.
Ten years before he had enquired of Michael Scot whether hate
would not suffice to give the soul power to return after death.
He is said now to have prayed that his bones might arise from
the dead to destroy Viterbo ; he could not slake his thirst for
1244 PROVISIONAL PEACE 587
blood unless he might fire the town with his own hand, and
though he had one foot in Paradise he would withdraw it to
take vengeance on Viterbo, Only for the sake of the world-
peace which was now at stake he would turn the key on righteous
wrath and lock his just grievances in his heart. Thus he wrote
to Cardinal Otto, freely exonerating both him and the Pope.
The events in Viterbo appeared to cause the Pope great pain.
He exacted a fine from the town, and to ensure its collection
he entrusted the execution of the sentence to : Cardinal Rainer.
He also commanded the release of the surviving ill-treated
imperialists. With the Cardinal's connivance the order was
disobeyed, and Innocent blandly apologised: he would have
been glad to put the matter right, but he did not want to risk
the loss of the town that had so recently been (so treacherously)
recovered. In face of such effrontery did Frederick still fancy
Innocent his friend ? Apparently he did. He still relied on
the Pope's fair dealing and wrote that he hoped through him
to arrive at peace and compass his own release from the ban.
King Louis of France was now directly interesting himself
in the peace negotiations, which set them moving again. On
both sides an effort was made to settle knotty points in order
that when Maundy Thursday came again the Emperor 's name
might no longer appear on the Pope's list as an outcast son
of the Church. An elaborate formula with detailed clauses of
reservation had been evolved to meet the Lombard difficulties :
the Pope was to appoint the satisfactions to be rendered, but
without prejudice to the imperial rights in Lombardy. On
Maundy Thursday 1244 a provisional peace was sworn, the
final form of which was still held over. The ceremony was
public and was performed by the Count of Toulouse, Piero
delta Vigna and Thaddeus of Suessa in presence of the Car
dinals, the Emperor of Constantinople, the Senator and the
people of Rome. The Pope on his part named the Emperor
in a public sermon as " a devoted son of the Church and a
believing Prince/' Both sides were thus committed, and
Frederick II joyfully acclaimed the event in addressing his
son Conrad. He also informed the German princes and
588 BREAKDOWN vm
invited them to a Diet at Verona for a date to be determined
later.
Everything now seemed in equilibrium, but Pope Innocent
had still the task of expounding the arrangement to the Lom
bards. Their envoys arrived in Rome, saw the draft treaty and
rejected it. They demanded that the Pope and the Pope alone,
should have unconditional and unlimited power to settle their
differences with the Emperor. Frederick II refused to go back
on the conditions already sworn. Innocent thereupon made
arbitrary alterations in the fair copy of the treaty intended for
ratification ; Frederick refused to accept them. Hesitations
on the Pope's part followed. Suddenly the wind veered. It
was no longer a question of the Lombards. The Emperor was
to restore the territories of the Church before his absolution.
With all his complaisance the Emperor could not concede this
point. Who would be his surety that he would be absolved ?
The Pope had no need of sureties, for he could again excom
municate the Emperor if he failed to restore the Patrimonium
according to treaty, and the status quo ante would be restored.
It would have been madness for the Emperor to throw away
his weightiest security— especially after the Viterbo experience.
This phase of the negotiations is important, for the Pope now
accused Frederick of perjury for refusing to evacuate the papal
territories before receiving absolution. No time had been
specified for the evacuation, simply because it was self-evident
that it was to follow the Emperor's release from the ban,
Frederick II now requested a personal interview with the
Pope and suggested their meeting in the Campagna. He would
forthwith surrender this section of the Patrimonium. Inno
cent suspected treachery. He feared that the Emperor intended
to get possession of his person. He first refused, then suddenly
accepted, but preferred to meet at Narni rather than in the
Campagna. The Emperor, therefore, moved to Terni, while
Innocent with his court quitted Rome and halted first in Civita
Castellana, sending Cardinal Otto to the Emperor. The sub
sequent negotiations were a pure mockery on the Pope's part.
He agreed to Frederick's wish that he should repair to the
Campagna. Frederick II had probably received some dis
quieting information and wanted to have the Pope near at hand.
I244 FLIGHT OF POPE 589
He was building everything on a personal interview. Before
this took place the difficulties solved themselves in another way.
Since Innocent had recognised that no negotiations could
end in a manner wholly satisfactory to the Curia he had planned
his flight. He did not love the clash of weapons. Suppose
that the negotiations finally broke down, suppose that war
broke out again, suppose that he were still in Rome. . . . The
events of Gregory's clay might repeat themselves ; the capital
might be besieged. The Genoese was taking no risks. Though
he was Pope he had hidden in one of the back rooms of the
Lateran for days and not ventured to appear at meals, because
he feared the faithful in some matter of ^S000- How would
he have borne himself at the approach of armed men !
Throughout the negotiations with the Emperor, Innocent had
been only playing for time to complete his preparations. ^ As
soon as he was apprised that all was in order he fled from Civita
Castcllana to Sutri ; thence by night, in disguise, accompanied
only by a few followers, to Civita Vecchia, where a number of
Genoese galleys lay at anchor ready to sail as arranged by him
weeks before. While the Emperor awaited his arrival m Narni
he put out to sea in the dawn of a certain morning. The story
ran that imperial horsemen were hunting for the Pope. On
the 7th of July, 1244, Innocent landed in his native town of
Genoa, where he was enthusiastically welcomed. He was
seriously ill from excitement and anxiety. He remained some
months in Genoa to recuperate, but he did not there feel him
self safe enough. In the late autumn he left the town , and after
a severe winter journey arrived in Lyons in the beginning of
December. This town nominally belonged to the Empire but
was really independent. Here Innocent IV remained until his
opponent was dead. It was the lever de rideau for Avignon.
" I was playing chess with the Pope and was about to mate
him or at least to take a castle when the Genoese burst in,
swept their hand across the board and wrecked the game."
In these words Frederick II announced to the Pisans a few
weeks later what had occurred. He was deeply moved by his
opponent's flight. He was normally mistrustful enough ; this
590 TURKS IN JERUSALEM vm
time he had trusted too long, and for the first time had been
deceived and beaten on his own field of diplomacy. He knew
only too well that it was no victory for him to have driven the
Pope to quit Rome and Italy. With one manoeuvre Innocent
had captured a whole series of important positions, and the
consequences of this flight— his only personal exploit— would
forthwith be felt in many directions. The Pope had only been
able to escape the persecutions of a savage tyrant by speedy
secret flight : such was the interpretation put on the matter by
many. Innocent did his best to confirm this view by posing
as a luckless fugitive, a hapless exile whose life was endangered
by a crazy Emperor. He was surrounded by guards to protect
him against imaginary assassins. In contrast to the Pope's
later procedure Frederick never intended to employ poison or
dagger. The Church was not dependent as was the Empire
on the life of one. A new Pope would have replaced the
murdered one and the Church would have gained a martyr.
" Who in his senses would imagine that we would seek the
death of one whose death would bring undying strife on us and
our successors ! " Even yet the Emperor did all in his power
to end the quarrel, but it was far more difficult to exert
pressure on the Curia when the Curia was not in Rome.
The flight to Lyons had not only rescued the Pope from the
fruitless fluctuations of the negotiations but had given him
personal liberty. He was practically beyond the Emperor's
reach. Lyons, instead of Rome, became the focus of the
Roman Church, and without let or hindrance the Pope could
get into immediate touch with all the world. The Emperor
could no longer cut his communications. He was able from
Lyons to summon the Council which Frederick had prevented
four years ago. Within a few weeks of his arrival the Pope
invited the princes of the Church and the ambassadors of the
kings for the Feast of St. John 1245 to a Synod to arrange for
the deposition of Kaiser Frederick.
A possibility of peace again presented itself. Through the
folly of the Christian knights in the Holy Land Jerusalem
had been conquered in August 1244 by a Turkish tribe, the
Khwarizmi, and for ever lost to Christendom, This misfor
tune demanded co-operation between the two powers, Empire
PEACE AT ANY PRICE 591
and Papacy, and the Patriarch Albert of Antioch, supported on
all sides, undertook the difficult task of bringing about a recon
ciliation. Above all Frederick wanted peace. The terms he
now offered were equivalent to a complete surrender : the Pope
should arbitrate unconditionally on the Lombard question,
Frederick would evacuate the Patrimonium ; he would depart
for three years to the Holy Land to reconquer it ; he would not
return earlier without the Pope's express permission ; he would
forfeit all his territories if he broke his vow ; he would appoint
kings and princes as his sureties. King Louis of France, who
had also taken the Cross, supported Frederick by refusing
permission to the Pope to reside in France. Innocent could
hardly hold out longer without himself appearing as the dis
turber of the peace. On the 6th of May, 1245, ^e commis
sioned the Patriarch of Antioch, who was with the Emperor,
to release him from the ban if the conditions were fulfilled.
It is not completely clear why Frederick II was suddenly
prepared for such a capitulation ; at one point he even con
templated abdicating in King Conrad's favour and going to the
East for good. His position was certainly growing more and
more difficult ; he was now fifty years of age and the craving for
peace must have become overmastering. The phase of life is
clearly visible in his constant toying with the thought of going
to the East for a long period : or for ever. Besides, for his
heirs' sake he wanted peace lest the quarrel should become
immortal for his successors. He himself could defy the world ;
he could hardly ask his successors to do the same. The fall of
the Empire seemed to lie ahead unless an end could be put, at
whatever sacrifice, to this quarrel.
Frederick was spared this humiliation. Once again the war
like manes of Gregory IX awoke. Cardinal Rainer of Viterbo,
on whom had fallen the mantle of Gregory's hate, succeeded
in dashing to the ground the last possibility of peace. Pope
Innocent intended to hold his Council in Lyons in June. It
happened that Frederick had invited the German princes for
the same date to a diet in Verona. In April 1245, while the
Patriarch of Antioch was still wrestling for peace, the Emperor
592 SAVAGE PROPAGANDA vm
set out from Apulia with his whole court and a large army and
marched north. His route lay through the Papal State, close
by Viterbo. He could not refrain from laying waste at least
the country round Viterbo and even indulging in a short siege.
On the representations of the Patriarch that hostilities would
imperil the negotiations that were in train he at last consented
to move on. He did so on that very 6th of May which Innocent
had appointed for his absolution.
Now Cardinal Rainer had been left behind as the Pope's
vicegerent in Italy. He had followed with deep vexation the
course of the Patriarch's overtures, which appeared likely to
bear fruit. As Frederick II devastated the Viterbo domains
it happened that the imperial troops here and there crossed into
papal territory. This gave Rainer of Viterbo a pretext for
again wrecking the threatening peace ; he made a report to the
Pope, and under his pen these trifling trespasses became a
serious breach of the treaty. At the same time he despatched
numerous pamphlets to the prelates assembling in Lyons, all
of which bore the hall-mark of the school of Gregory IX,
These pamphlets of Rainer of Viterbo were destined to fix
for all time the hostile portrait of Frederick II as the della
Vigna letters fix the contrasting portrait for his friends. In his
decree of deposition Pope Innocent only reproduces in moder
ated terms and with more coherence the contents of Cardinal
Rainer's unbridled and hate-ridden pamphlets. Pope Gregory's
awe-inspiring manifesto of excommunication was, in com
parison, a mild and harmless document. The Pope had been
the first to treat Frederick II as an apocalyptic figure. Rainer
utilised all the terrifying imagery of the Revelation and the
Prophets to prove that Frederick was, in fact, the forerunner of
Antichrist. All previous accusations are raised to a monstrous
and inhuman power, each one is corroborated by the phrases
of the prophets employed with savage fury. No single feature
of Antichrist must be missing ; all must be found in Frederick's
life. Rainer rehearses all Frederick's activities, and finds in all
symbols of the Antichrist : his friendship with the Muhammadan
princes, from whom he accepts gifts in spite of their slaughter of
the Christians ; the heretical sayings of his courtiers, repeated
as his own ; the existence of the Saracen colony ; the outrages
HEROD AND NERO 593
committed by these warriors, who are alleged to violate Chris
tian women and girls before the altar of their God ; the murder
of Pope Gregory and of his own imprisoned son, all these
crimes are laid at Frederick's door. Further, it is recounted
how he had kept his three consorts (the third of whom had
recently died) imprisoned in " the labyrinth of his Gomorrah,"
and, finally, had poisoned them ; how he and his warriors spread
death and destruction throughout the world, how he savagely
pursued even the prelates with his ships. *' But because his
accursed raging and his fearsome stiff-necked wrath are like
unto the foaming sea that cannot rest but stirs up with its
waves the mud and slime in the eyes of all that see , he charged
against the Lord with the uplifted neck of his pride and with
the broad shoulders of his riches and his power he destroyed
the cities, ravaged the habitations and recked so little of men
that he slew them like lambs. But the foe and the pursuer set
his hand to yet worse evil. He carried the war further against
the saints and constrained them. Lifting himself up against
Heaven he flung down from the firmament and from the stars
the holy ones of the Most High and tore them in pieces. He
hath three rows of teeth in his jaws, for the monks and the
clerks and the innocent laity, and mighty claws of iron hath he,
and some he hath devoured, consigning them to death, and
others he hath slain with other torments, and the remnant he
hath trampled in his dungeons under foot. Hell-hound shall
he be called like Herod, yet Herod thought only to slay the
Christ, while this man blasphemes the body of the Lord and
strives to overturn the law of God and hath slaughtered exalted
members of the clergy. Crueller than Nero shall he be known,
for Nero slew the Christians because they sought to abolish the
worship of his idols, but this man is crueller and baser than
Julian the Apostate who seeketh to destroy the faith he doth
himself prof ess/ '
Every deed that Frederick had wrought marks him as Anti
christ : the closure of Sicily and the passport regulations are
tokens of Satan, and now this glorification of his own person.
" And thus this new Nimrod, a raging hunter before the Lord,
steeped in vice, who loveth the lying word, hath as his servants
abandoned men who delight the king with their wickedness,
594 BLASPHEMER vm
and with lies rejoice their prince. ... He despises the ban and
gulps down his punishments like water from a brimming gob
let and misprises the power of the Keys, this Prince of Tyranny,
this overthrower of the Church's faith and worship, this de
stroyer of precept, this master of cruelty, the transformer of the
times, this confounder of the earth, this scourge of the universe.
He is like unto the fallen angels who would fain be the equals of
God and seat themselves on the mountains of the Most High.
Like Lucifer he essayed to scale the heavens to establish his
throne above the stars and the candlesticks of the Bride, and his
seat over against midnight, that he may be equal to, yea higher
than, the vicegerent of the Most High. And while he sits
like Very God in the temple of the Lord he alloweth priests and
bishops to kiss his very feet, and while he commandeth that
they shall call him holy, he hath all them beheaded as enemies
of the State and as blasphemers who dare to utter truth about
his manifest untruths. When the apostolic chair long time
stood empty, the heart of this evil prince became uplifted to
the destruction of the Church, and like the Prince of Tyre he
would fain have sat upon the seat of God as if he were God
indeed, and he sought himself to choose the High Priest and
to fasten his yoke upon the apostolic chair, and had in mind to
break the right divine and to alter the eternal precept of the
Gospel. Since he hath in his forehead the horn of power and
a mouth that bringeth forth monstrous things, he thinketh him
self enabled to transform the times and the laws and to lay
truth in the dust, and hence he blasphemed against the Highest
and uttered contumelies against Moses and against God."
The aim of these half-insane, abusive trumpetings was to
cause the priests assembled in Lyons to forget the very pos
sibility of peace and induce them to agree to Frederick's
deposition. " Sacred vessels and holy places dedicated to God
hath he put to shameful uses, as of old Belshazzar the Baby
lonian defiled the vessels of the temple of Jehovah what time
the prophetic finger wrote on the wall mene tekel upharsiny who
in that same night lost his Empire and his life. This criminal
deserves no less to lose his kingdom of the Church." Cardinal
Rainer quotes dozens of biblical parallels, "The men of Beth-
shemesh were destroyed because they looked upon the ark of
DESTROY THE BABYLONIAN 595
the covenant ; Uzzah was slain because with unclean hand he
sought to support the ark of the Lord ; Uzziah the king, who
sought symbolically to burn incense on the altar of incense, was
marked with leprosy on his forehead, and the word of the priest
drave him from his throne ; Korah, the shameless, with his
kindred was devoured by fire because he sought to snatch the
privilege of the priesthood. Of a truth whoever could be
proven to have transgressed the law of Moses was without
mercy condemned to death/' How much more does Frederick
deserve such a fate : " Have therefore no pity for the ruthless
one ! Cast him to the ground before the face of the kings that
they may see and fear to follow in his footsteps ! Cast him
forth out of the holy place of God that he may rule no longer
over Christian people ! Destroy the name and fame, the seed
and sapling of this Babylonian ! Let mercy forget him ! "
Cardinal Rainer knew how to get his effects. The pamph
lets contain nothing doctrinal, nothing about the supremacy of
the Pope over the Emperor, no learned hair-splittings. In the
main their contents consisted in rehearsing the Emperor's well-
known behaviour with interpretations which turned everything
Caesarean into anti-Christian. How ripe the moment was for
such bogeys needs no elaboration. The appearance of Anti
christ had been independently and confidently predicted for
the year 1260, and we recall how the dawn of this year of terror
brought the outbreak of the Flagellants throughout Europe.
Rainer of Viterbo played for his own ends on the unreasoning
terror which this event inspired. The Emperor's downfall was
the goal of his existence. When the Council met in Lyons at
the end of June men lent a willing ear to these extravagant
outbursts.
Frederick II was also summoned to appear in Lyons, though
it is true that the Pope had only indirectly invited him in the
course of a sermon. The position was an impossible one : the
Roman Emperor could not appear as the accused before a
council consisting almost wholly of hostile bishops. If he had
appeared escorted by an army the situation would have become
even more acute. Frederick, moreover, knew nothing of the
596 DIET OF VERONA vm
altered atmosphere produced by Rainer's reports and writings,
and still imagined that his position was favourable. At the end
of May 1245 he reached Parma on his march to Verona, and
from thence he despatched his representative and advocate to
Lyons, the tried and trusty Thaddeus of Suessa. We know
frankly nothing about this renowned jurist and orator. He
may have been a replica on a smaller scale of Piero della Vigna ;
his name indicates that he was a native of the Campagna. He
was always one of Frederick's most faithful adherents and was
killed fighting his battles. This man was now entrusted with
the most responsible and difficult task that can be conceived — the
hopeless defence of his master before a court of hostile priests.
While Thaddeus journeyed to Lyons Frederick proceeded
to Verona. Here, after many years, he again met Eccelino, and
here King Conrad with the nobles of Germany awaited his
father. The most important business before the Verona Diet
was the Austrian situation. Frederick was contemplating a
marriage with the heiress of the last of the Babenbergs and was
prepared to create Austria a kingdom in return for his bride.
The papal Curia had other plans for the Duke's daughter, and
apparently succeeded in terrifying Gertrude of Austria at the
thought of marrying the excommunicated Aoitichrist. One of
Rainer's pamphlets represented Frederick as a Bluebeard who
had already murdered three wives, and some legate would
appear to have put this in her hands. However this may be,
the seventeen-year old girl refused at the last moment to follow
her father to Verona. So this Austrian scheme fell through.
When the Duke died in the next year 1246 Austria was annexed
as a vacant imperial fief and administered by a Vicar General.
This was the last Diet of Frederick's at which the German
princes put in an appearance, and there were already serious
gaps in the ranks. King Conrad, Frederick's son and heir,
remained some weeks with the Emperor ; it was the last time
his father saw him. The boy was only seventeen, but he had
matured early according to the Hohenstaufen habit ; joyless
years of inglorious fighting lay before him in which in spite of
his ability he could only hold his own. All that was brilliant
in Frederick seems to have been handed on to his bastard sons,
and beside Enzio, Manfred, Frederick of Antioch, the fate of
I245 COUNCIL OF LYONS 597
the legitimate heirs seems drab indeed. Burdens too heavy to
be borne had been laid on their young shoulders.
From Verona the Emperor sent an embassy to Lyons to
bring the new peace proposals. An arrangement had been
made with Thaddeus of Suessa that the Emperor would halt
in Turin in July so as to be the nearer to Lyons in case of a
reconciliation with the Pope for which he still hoped. When
he left Verona in haste on the 8th of July, later than had been
agreed upon, the first two meetings of the Council were over.
The Council was not well attended. Innocent Ill's Lateran
Council had rallied 405 ; scarcely 150 prelates attended at
Lyons. The German and Hungarian bishops were absent
almost to a man, so were the Sicilians, for Berard of Palermo
attended only in his capacity of Emperor's representative ; very
few Italians appeared. There remained only the clergy of
England and of France to be the Emperor's judges, and the
bishops of Spain, who since the sea-encounter of 1241 nourished
an indescribable fury against Frederick, though they were the
only victims who escaped. After their arrival in Genoa the
Spaniards had at once written to the Pope, Gregory IX, to take
every possible step against Frederick II, for he is setting a bad
example to other kings. Nevertheless, the Council styled itself
$ " General Council," though Frederick sturdily disputed its
claim to the title. According to the testimony of friend and
foe, Thaddeus of Suessa's defence of his master during the
sittings of the first two days was brilliant. Cardinal Rainer
had summarised the various accusations under the incongruous
title of " lese majesty." His reasoning appears to have been
somewhat on these lines : the clergy are members of the
Church, hence members of the Body of Christ ; the majesty
of Christ is above the majesty of man ; whoever, therefore,
injures a priest is guilty of lese majesty. We need not pursue
in detail the defence of the High Court Judge. By the end of
the second day the most important thing that he had accom
plished was the adjournment for twelve days of the final session.
He was awaiting plenary powers, or even the Emperor's per
sonal attendance, for Frederick had already reached Turin.
Not to appear intransigeant Pope Innocent agreed to the delay.
He did not, however, wait for the arrival of the envoys. All
598 DEPOSITION vin
that was necessary had been arranged in secret session with the
prelates, and the blow was timed to fall on the iyth of July.
The concluding session of the Council was introduced like
the earlier ones by a solemn ceremonial. The Pope sat on a
raised throne in the choir of the Cathedral church of Lyons,
the nave of which was filled with archbishops and abbots. A
few serious complaints of the English prelates against the
money-hunters of the Curia, a topic unwelcome to the Pope,
were speedily disposed of. The refusal of Thaddeus of Suessa
to recognise the assembly as a General Council was " humbly
and benevolently " waved aside by the Pope. Protests on
Frederick's behalf by envoys of the French and English kings
received no hearing, and the Patriarch of Aquileia, venturing to
take up the Emperor's defence, was threatened with the loss of
his ring if he broke silence.
Thereupon the Pope read the decree of deposition. Frede
rick had been proved guilty of perjury, breach of the peace,
sacrilege and heresy. He was perjured because he had not
fulfilled the treaty sworn in Rome ; he had repeatedly broken
the peace with the Church ; he had committed sacrilege in
taking prisoner the prelates ; and, finally, he was a heretic who
was even yet bound in the bonds of friendship to the Saracen
kings ; he had put his consorts in the charge of eunuchs ; he
had permitted Muhammad to be proclaimed in the Temple of
the Lord at Jerusalem ; he had utilised Saracens as warriors
against Christians ; he had entered into marriage relations with
the schismatic Emperor, John Vatatzes ; he had cleared princes
from his path by assassins ; he had caused the sacred mysteries
to be celebrated in his presence when he was excommunicate.
Apart from the irregularities of his harem he despised the
morals and manners of a Catholic prince, and took no pains to
secure his good repute or the salvation of his soul by pious
deeds ; he gave no alms ; he was ready enough to destroy
churches and oppress the clergy, but he had built neither church
nor cloister, neither hospital nor any other pious building. In
virtue, therefore, of his papal power to bind and to loose, the
Pope declared this Emperor, so sunk in sin, deposed — and his
territories released from their allegiance. A new Emperor must
be chosen. Whereupon Pope and Prelates extinguished the
1245 FINAL METAMORPHOSIS 599
torches which they bore, and while Thaddeus of Suessa, weep
ing and beating his breast, left the cathedral with the other
supporters of the Emperor, Pope and Prelates intoned the
Te Deum.
With pain and wrath and scorn Frederick received the news.
How could the Roman Emperor, the Lord of all majesty, be
accused of lese-majesty and deposed ! Sternly he bade them
bring his royal treasure. Choosing amongst his many crowns
he selected one and himself placed it on his head and grimly
remarked : he had not yet lost his crowns and would not let
papal baseness nor council's decree rob him of them without
most bloody battle. His position now, he said, was better than
before. Previously he had to obey the Pope, now he was free ;
without obligations.
Pope Innocent himself had saved Frederick from a second
Canossa, from a humiliating peace and a decline from the
heights of Empire. The pamphlets had unwittingly pointed
the way which the last Emperor of the Roman Empire no longer
hesitated to tread. In Lyons they had called him " Proteus,"
who was not to be caught because he constantly changed his
form. He was now ready for the final metamorphosis thrust
on him. Something of that northern defiance and northern
horror which formed part of his make-up now found vent, when
Frederick II, whom men had called Antichrist and Scourge of
the World, turned to his followers with a new saying : c< I have
been anvil long enough . . . now I shall play the hammer ! "
IX. ANTICHRIST
Dual interpretation of Frederick's life Frederick's pos
terity Satellite giants : Eccelino, Guido of Sessa,
Hubert Pallavicini " Labour of Love " : to purge the
Church Reform manifestos Pope's counter-activi
ties Increasing savagery of Frederick Lure of the
East Conspiracy of intimates, 1246 Distrust of
subordinates Punishment of conspirators Com
plicity of Pope Henry Raspe Italy partitioned
amongst the Hohenstaufen March on Germany ;
threat to Lyons Defection of Parma " The
Cardinal " Siege of Parma Saracens as execu
tioners Victoria Defeat before Parma Money
shortage German knights in Italy German influ
ence on Renaissance art Renewed threat to Lyons
Fall of Piero della Vigna Attempt to poison
Frederick Piero della Vigna's suicide Enzio taken
prisoner Manfred's rise and fall Death of Enzio
Conradin's coronation Tagliacozzo ; Conradin's
execution Curse on the Hohenstaufen Parma
avenged Death of Frederick, December 13, 1250
Burial at Palermo The Frederick myth
IX. ANTICHRIST
" Nemo contra Deum nisi Deus ipse."
" Now I shall be hammer ! " This was the characteristic cry
which led Nietzsche to hail Frederick of Hohenstaufen as " one
of my nearest kin." Nietzsche, the first German to breathe
the same air as Frederick, took up the cry and echoed it.
Frederick had struck a new note, and passed into a super
natural world in which no law was valid save his own need.
He had long realised that he would be compelled to loose
terrible and savage forces ; he shrank from it and had sought
to avert it by the humblest offers of peace, even by complete
submission to the Pope ; nay, by actual abdication. He did not
seek the role of the Scourge of God, compelled to lay the
recalcitrant " between hammer and anvil and to smite their
obstinacy with blows so thick that they shall bow their necks
to the yoke of commandment, and whatever their thoughts may
be, shall recognise their true master."
Innocent IV had not recognised that a man like Frederick II
could be bound only by fetters of his own forging and would
take on him the yoke only of his own choosing. Innocent
trusted to his papal power of binding and loosing, to excom
munication and deposition, and had thus released from bondage
the Antichrist, whom the Lord himself had held in fetters for
a thousand years. The chains had worn thin ; they had grown
rusty ; the Pope had subjected them to a strain too great. The
" Lord of the World " might polish them till they shone like
gold, and voluntarily adorn himself therewith, but they could
not bind him against his will. He laughed them to scorn.
Since Antichrist it had to be, Frederick accepted his fate.
All that had gone before now wore an air of preparation and
seemed to indicate a readiness to welcome the inevitable with
open eye. Though he had been (Frederick wrote) unalterably
convinced that this Pope, like all others, would be opposed to
him, yet he had worked to compass the elevation of Innocent.
603
604 HATE ix
Why ? " Solely in order that our hand might hold him whom
we should overcome or — if the fates had been kinder — him
whom we should love ? "
That is to say with open eyes to co-operate with mysterious
fate, to create his own foe since fate so willed. This is the
clearsighted fatalism of the man of action : a survival of the
heroic age. A thousand years of Christianity lend it a Christian
colouring : almost to the point of self-immolation Frederick
had hoped that he might love his enemy. But the Norns which
ruled the career of this Hohenstaufen recognised no such
solution. Love was barred ; he must fulfil himself through
hate. If he might not as a Saviour-Emperor join hands with
an Angel-Pope to draw the peoples under the gentle yoke of an
Emperor of the End, he was ready with scourge and sword,
with axe and halter, to compel the recreants to bow under the
yoke. " Because they above all others have cut us to the HEART,
therefore shall we pursue after them with greater zeal and fury,
we shall the more mightily deploy our powers to compass their
destruction, we shall wield the sword of vengeance the more
cruelly against them . . . and the HATE that consumes us will
be slaked only by their utter annihilation."
At every stage of his career it was clear that Frederick was
full of primeval hate for any disturber of his sacred order.
Hatred and revenge — virtues both in Frederick's eyes — are
characteristics of the priest, who asks quite other reparation
from the desecrator of his Holy of Holies than that which the
warrior exacts from his enemy. Hatred and revenge are quali
ties of the Justitia and of the judge of whom it is said " the
righteous is as a glowing coal." Frederick II was the sacred
judge in a degree undreamt of by Emperors before or after him,
hence gratitude, tolerance, kindness, magnanimity, had no
more right than their opposites to a place amongst his qualities.
Gentleness and mercy he recognised as forces at the disposal
of Justitia, in the same way as revenge and hate, but hence
forward he displays almost exclusively the avenging power of
the state-founding Justitia. Hatred becomes to him the breath
of life. In proportion as the foe no longer seeks to overthrow
the Emperor's order, but aims solely at his person, this hate
becomes a personal imperative. As the Scourge of God he
HAMMER NOT ANVIL 605
recognises no law, divine or human, save his own advantage
and his own caprice. None knew, none guessed what he was
fighting for, what he still hoped to gain — perhaps he knew
himself — except the assertion of his own personality. He
became the battle-cry of the West ; bloodier and more savage
than before the strife raged through the Christian world round
his person alone. Never before in Christian times had one
single individual achieved such personal importance — Frederick
the man, not Frederick the Emperor. Times had changed.
Those lofty ideals for which Frederick had fought of old : the
rebirth of the Roman Empire, the reign ofjustitiay the mission
of World Peace — at most their distant echoes faintly sounded,
as " revolution " and " enlightenment " echoed faintly round
Napoleon in his last years. They no longer supplied the driving
force. The person of the Emperor was now the World-Idea.
If Frederick had been unable thus to exalt himself the Curia
would still have given the struggle its oecumenical importance.
With magnificent single-minded concentration the Church laid
aside all other tasks and devoted her entire world-organisation
to the destruction of one man. The Church magnified the
Hohenstaufen into a giant. The Papacy, with all the forces of
all the countries of Europe, was now fighting not the Emperor
nor the Empire, but one demon in whom all the evil of the
world was incarnate, one Hohenstaufen, by name Frederick.
Only once again has the world seen such a fight against a single
man in which, perhaps, greater numbers were involved, but
scarcely greater forces, the final death-grapple with Napoleon.
This was the atmosphere in which Frederick let his new note
be heard. The air of Attila was round him which he alone
could breathe. Attila's mission was his, which none but he
could comprehend. Instinctively his contemporaries bestowed
on him the cognomens that Attila had borne, " Scourge of the
Peoples," " Hammer of the World." With hushed voices his
own followers styled him no longer merely " him who ruleth
over earth and sea " or " him who maketh the winds of heaven
to rejoice," but " him whose might tramples the mountains
and bends them." All Europe suffered terribly under him,
friend and foe alike, Italy and Germany more particularly.
Except for those who worshipped and followed him3 Frederick
606 ANTICHRIST INDEED K
now became in very deed the incarnation of evil. He possessed,
indeed, a capacity for evil rare in a ruler of his greatness. Nor
has any man ever felt a greater joy in ill-doing than Frederick
in the role the hostile Church had thrust upon him. Where
the State was at stake Frederick had always been capable of
every meanness and cunning, of every violence and severity, of
every deceit and ruse, of every malice and of every scorn. " I
never reared a pig but I was prepared to eat his bacon " is one
of his sayings. Hitherto whatever evil he had done had been
done for the sake of the State. The world was now at war
over the body of the Hohenstaufen. State necessity had of old
constituted right : now his personal exigencies. Law was bent
to his will not to serve the state or the world at large but at the
apparent bidding of imperial caprice. Theoretically he had
often proclaimed that the welfare of the Empire, of the other
peoples, of the kings, of those who believed, hung upon his
private weal or woe. Every act of his now appeared more
tyrannical, more monstrous, and was, in fact, more ruthless since
it seemed to serve the preservation of one single individual.
Just because Frederick II had so nearly been the Saviour (and
indeed in the eyes of the faithful still was) he had the oppor
tunity to be the very Antichrist. Since as a priest he knew all
mysteries no mystery was safe from his fearless mocking attack.
No spirit among all the thousand demons of the world was a
stranger to his cosmopolitan mind. All the supernatural magic
of the East was at his command and the elusive jinns, and all
the satanic poisons of Italy and the immeasurable daring of the
German Mephistopheles, who crosses the Alps " and believes
that all is his.' * The great saying of Luther might well have
been applied to him : "An Italianised German is the devil
incarnate ! "
It is hardly necessary to mention that ecclesiastical principles,
excommunication and dethronement decreed by a Council,
broke powerlessly against this genius and ruler of the
Opposition-world : " The stones hurled by the papal catapults
were changed to straw." The blasphemies with which he was
credited are without number ; whether authentic or not, they
BLASPHEMIES 607
were believed. The Church in her own defence circulated the
wildest exaggerations and the most fatuous lies, and spread them,
more widely than Frederick in speech with his friends could
possibly have done. Not only the speech about the three
deceivers, but mockeries about the sacraments were ascribed
to Frederick as to every heretic. At the sight of a cornfield he
is said to have remarked with jesting reference to the Eucharist :
" What a lot of gods are ripening here ! " And another time,
" even if God had been bigger than the biggest mountain the
priests would surely have devoured him before now." And
when he saw a priest bearing in haste the viaticum to a dying
man : " how long will this humbug continue ? " It is known
that he made merry over the virgin birth as contrary to nature,
and that he denied the immortality of the soul. Cardinal
Rainer was, therefore, not without some justification when in
his pamphlets he asked : What was to restrain the Emperor from
the most devilish infamy since he had no craving for eternal
bliss, which he was prepared to sacrifice to slake his thirst for
vengeance in the blood of the people of Viterbo, and since he
had no fear of helL For he had taught his courtiers to believe
that " the soul passes away like a breath and is consumed like
an apple plucked from off the tree, man and apple composed
alike of the four juices."
What recked he of the Church's means of grace — confession,
penance, absolution — since he and his astrologers believed in
fate determined by the stars, and such a belief in fate precluded
remorse ! How was a man to be bridled who counted human
blood as naught, who could, with impunity, hang or behead,
drown or imprison bishop, monk or priest, whom men re
proached for pulling down churches to build privies in their
place and using the stones for fortresses for his beloved
Saracens !
Councils and popes could certainly now erect no barriers
that Frederick would have hesitated to break down. The only
limits he could recognise were those he set himself. He had
taken on himself a new mission, the office of Hammer of the
World and Scourge of God : not without the demonic joy of
creative genius in being free to destroy : not without the pain
and sorrow of preserving genius in being forced to destroy.
608 SELF-RESTRAINT ix
Pope Gregory had once said that Frederick loved to hear him
self called Antichrist ; but Frederick had endured to the last
limit of endurance before becoming Antichrist indeed. He was
capable of any sacrilege, of any blasphemy, of any depravity,
but whatever rage or revenge he might indulge was never
wanton, it was always necessary for his self-preservation, and
with it all he preserved always unimpaired the proud gesture
of a Caesar, the noble bearing, the exalted dignity which stooped
to nothing mean, the self-control, the poise that became a
Christian Caesar. Woe to the heretic who dared to draw near
him as a " fellow heretic ! " He remained to the last the
Christian Emperor in style and bearing, without prejudice to
his personal system of dogma. " Even dogmatic orthodoxy is
false if the correct bearing is lacking," he once wrote. The
phenomenon was remarkable : however violently his terrible
and primitive force broke forth it was always controlled by
the restraint of a Roman Augustus, who might tolerate vice but
not indiscipline. He once described his own ambition : " to
repress even the most righteous impulses of the spirit, and in
virtuous self-discipline to preserve a Caesar's calm." Thus
we too must picture him. A Scourge of God not in the aber
rations of Ivan the Terrible, not sunk in sinister and brooding
gloom, but in a more eerie windless calm, the detached aloofness
of a timeless God, Thus under the figure of Caesar Augustus,
Kaiser Frederick is reflected two-fold in a double mirror as
Antichrist and as the Messianic Judge.
Caesar, Messiah, Antichrist : these are the three fundamen
tally identical manifestations of Frederick II since Cortenuova,
since the beginning of his World Rule. He remained un
changed ; only the fluctuations of circumstance show us his
form lit with a different glow. The more he genuinely approxi
mated to a Roman Augustus from whom salvation was to
come the more he resembled the very antithesis. A genuine
Roman Emperor reincarnate who erected statues to himself,
inevitably appeared as Nero or as Antichrist beside the
Galilean.
The whole life of Frederick II could be interpreted either
in the Messianic or the Anti-Christian spirit. The Antichrist
begotten in sin shall be surrounded by astrologers and augurs,
DUAL INTERPRETATION 609
wizards and magicians, shall re-introduce demon worship, shall
seek personal fame and call himself God Almighty. He shall
come to Jerusalem and set up his throne in the Temple. He
shall restore the temple of Solomon, and shall lie, and call
himself the son of the Almighty. He shall convert the kings
and princes and through them the peoples. He shall send his
messengers and preachers over the whole earth, and his message
shall reach from sea to sea, from East to West and from South
to North. With him the Empire of Rome shall end. He shall
accomplish signs and wonders and unheard-of deeds, but con
fusion shall reign upon earth the like of which was not before.
When men shall see his deeds then even the perfect and the
chosen of God shall be in doubt, whether he be Christ who
shall come again at the End of the World according to the
scriptures or whether he be Antichrist. For both must be
like and equal.
Frederick's manners and methods were always open to two
interpretations. His menagerie and exotic pomp made some
to think of a world-king who ruled over all beasts and kindreds
and tongues, of the Messiah under whose sceptre all the animals
of earth should lie together in peace ; while some saw in this
train of owls and pards and dark-skinned corybantes, sweep
ing through the towns of Italy, the hosts of the Apocalypse.
Frederick could not mount a horse but some symbolic meaning
was forthwith attached thereto : if he rode a white horse he
was aping the Saviour and was accused of blasphemy ; if a
chestnut, he became " the rider on a red horse " who bringeth
strife ; if he chose a dun, he was death : and if he was mounted
on a black horse men trembled before the judge with his
balance. Frederick probably aggravated things himself by
calling his favourite horse " Dragon." When Cardinal Rainer
spoke of the " horn of power in his forehead/' and when the
Cistercians, after his deposition, dated their writings according
to the years of the reign of " Fridericus Cornutus," the horn is
thought of as the sign of Satan. But two horns are the token
of the Messiah, symbols not of evil but of power as Moses
shows and Alexander. Frederick was reputed invulnerable ;
in later days this was accepted as conclusive proof of a pact
with the Devil ; but others believed that only God could sum-
6io SATANIC OR DIVINE? ix
mon back his own. Some called Frederick the fallen angel
whose countenance had once been likest God's ; others thought
of the God-likeness of the Messiah, and Piero della Vigna
celebrates his master as " like unto God." Riches marked the
Antichrist, but again Christ was lord over all the treasures of
the earth, Frederick's knowledge of tongues, so that " he was
wont to speak in many languages of many kinds," was also
satanic : or divine. Points in which Frederick quite unques
tionably appeared as the Christian ruler caused most discussion
of all : for deceit and disguise were the chief characteristics of
Antichrist. Frederick was then more dangerous than ever.
There is irony in the fact that this temperate man, who pre
served his health by a regime of one meal a day (so that he was
even accused of stultifying the penance of fasting), should have
volunteered to win absolution by fasting.
Frederick's life was a consistent unity, though capable of a
dual interpretation ; yet some have sought to find a " conflict "
in it and to trace this throughout his life : the freethinker
persecutes heretics ; the friend of Saracens goes a-crusading ;
the man whose very atmosphere generated freedom must nip
freedom in the bud as he fights the freedom-loving towns ; the
man born to rule the world must confine himself to Italy ; the
man who poured scorn on the priesthood must call himself
a priest; the Christian Emperor must needs by penetrating
query undermine the Christian faith ; and , finally, he who would
fain be like the Messiah was yet prepared to play the Scourge
of God and Hammer of the World. It is depreciating genius
to expect it to be transparently simple to construe.
The conception of a Roman- Christian Caesar implied the
fusion of two worlds ; the tension of two extreme forces. Each
perpetually denied the other, each owed the other the fullness
of its vitality. A smaller man than Frederick II would have
succumbed under the strain, but at such altitudes the same
miracle is ever renewed and ever challenges man's admiration :
" the glaciers shone on by the fiercest sun become not warm,
neither do they melt, the sunlight lends them brilliance only."
Frederick summed up the situation in his fundamental dogma
THE EAGLES AND THE CROSS 611
of the secular State : true freedom exists only under the yoke
of the Imperium.
For once these antitheses could co-exist in one form and
shape without thus losing firmness of texture or of outline :
Emperor and Galilean ; Pagan and Christian ; Saviour and
Antichrist. For the Christ whom Frederick the Hohenstaufen
represented, who was for the last time incarnate in this German
Emperor, was the almost pagan Christ of the Old Saxon Heliand,
the lesus Rex of the royal house of David, who wore the diadem
of the Roman Emperors and ruled the Germanic year with fame
and glory ; who founded the new Christian Imperium which
ended with him. This Saviour, blent of Germanic, Greek, and
Christian elements, wearing a crown of light, holding in his
hand the orb, the lance, the book, enthroned in the aloofness
of the mandorla that knows not time nor space : this was the
Saviour whom Frederick in actual fact released, fulfilled and
lived, lending him bodily existence in his own flesh. Christ
once more had become man : God was again to die. St.
Francis had vouchsafed a new glimpse of the same God : a
picture of a gentle not a jealous God, a sufferer with wounds
and crown of thorns, beside whom the stern judge and un
approachable, the fame-crowned king, inevitably appeared as
Antichrist. For yesterday's God is ever the Satan of to-day.
For nearly three hundred years — the era of the Renaissance
— the strife of the one yet dual God was the spur of mankind.
Dante was the first to fight it to the end and overcome. Dante
who reconciled the Eagles and the Cross, the kingdoms of this
world and the next, ended the opposition which had begun with
Vergil, and growing ever stronger had lasted for a thousand
years. The tension between the Empire of Caesar and the
Empire of Christ was symbolised in the two contemporaries,
Francis and Frederick, preceding the great singer with whom
the Empire closed. Another great singer Vergil, whom Dante
claimed as master, had heralded the era of tension and cleavage,
the age of the dual Saviour, Christus- Augustus.
Frederick's influence partook of this dual character. His
legacy was most potent in Italy, and the reverberations of his
612 SATELLITE GIANTS ix
career were felt there for three hundred years. New giants
grew up around him. Through his son-in-law Eccelino of
Romano, the Devil of Treviso, he became the ancestor of
Sigismondo Malatesta and of Cesare Borgia. Eccelino, the
admirer and the creature of the Hohenstaufen, was one of the
many who seized on one trait only of the Emperor's many-sided
character and exaggerated it into a colossal caricature. The
ruthless assertion of personality, the unbridled lust for power,
became with Eccelino an end in themselves and therefore evil.
After the death of the Emperor had removed all restraint, this
tyrant developed his vices to their uttermost. The two men
were of the same age, but Eccelino survived Frederick for nine
years. Long before the end Romano was the most feared and
most hated man in the East of Northern Italy, which, in the
Emperor's name, he had subjected to his power. Eccelino had
ripened in the party quarrellings of the towns, had at an oppor
tune moment rallied to the Hohenstaufen banner, and been
given a free hand in those regions without any definite imperial
office. Basing his operations on Padua, Verona and Vicenza,
Eccelino had built up a self-contained despotism. He added
town after town to his possessions, raised taxes on his own
authority, promulgated new laws, appointed his own relations
to office, at times against the Emperor's wishes, and even
enlarged his territories at the Emperor's expense. His power
was based wholly on terror. From pure self-seeking he re
mained faithful to Frederick, and, as he was a trustworthy
guardian of the Brenner, Frederick left him unmolested.
Eccelino, in spite of the Emperor's backing, was the first of a
new type of ruler, a type which Manfred later dignified by
referring to the precedent of Caesar : the illegitimate prince
who founds his throne on power and cunning, and maintains
it with severity, cruelty and fear, relying on his personality
alone.
Dante represents the tyrant Eccelino expiating his sins in a
stream of boiling blood : " that brow whereon the hair so jetty
clustering hangs." He is said to have been covered all over
with black hair like an animal's coat. His outward appearance
was sinister, his bearing assured. He was only of middle
height, but the sight of him inspired terror. He always ap-
A TYRANT'S END 613
peared to be trembling with wrath and arrogance. Though for
political reasons he had frequently been married, he held aloof
from women. He despised them and rarely approached one.
Yet he poniarded on the instant a German soldier whom he
caught raping a woman at the storming of Vicenza. He liked
to call himself a " scourge sent for the punishment of sinners,"
seeking the sinners rather among the aristocracy than amongst
the common people, whom he kept sternly under his heel.
Eccelino believed that his fate was linked with the stars and
relied on the learned Guido Bonatti and the long-bearded
Saracen, Paul of Baghdad, to read his fortunes in the sky. He
loved magnificence, but his Padua court displayed only the
oppressive pomp of the tyrant, and his Saracen bodyguards
served more for awe than for grandeur. " This state must be
kept pure " was the motto of the despot, who grew more and
more stony as the years went on. The faintest breath of
suspicion spelt rack or stake, castration or the dungeon. He
is said to have sacrificed 50,000 men by murder, torture or
execution to maintain his power. He acted, no doubt, on the
principle of his brother-in-law, Salinguerra : " The whole
heavens are the Lord's . . . but the earth hath he given to the
children of men." He died faithful to his principles. He was
sixty-five when uncounted enemies suddenly surrounded him,
and brave though he was and tried in battle,,he was stunned by
the blow of a club and taken prisoner. He refused food and
doctors and died within a few days. He repudiated confession
and the last sacrament, jesting that he had but one crime of which
he repented, having let himself be overpowered and being un
able to take vengeance. Whereupon he dismissed the priest.
His voluntary death may well have saved him from an end as
gruesome as his brother's . Alberigo of Romano had at first been
hostile to Eccelino, but later became his ally. He was quite as
cruel, and lustful to boot. They made him creep on all fours
to the place of execution with a bit in his mouth, serving as a
mount for the mob. He was made to witness the tortures of
his family, then the flesh was torn from his body with pincers,
and while still living he was tied to a horse and dragged to death.
Eccelino was by no means the only giant in Frederick's circle.
Another was Guido of Sessa, who cynically refused the last
614 HUBERT PALLAVICINI ix
rites to some condemned papalists, assuring them that as friends
of the Pope they were sure of immediate access to Paradise.
Taking flight, one night, he and his horse plunged into the
lepers' cloaca and perished in the filth. Yet another was the
one-eyed Margrave Hubert Pallavicini, who began as Eccelino's
friend but betrayed his rival and took him prisoner. He
rivalled Eccelino in vice and practised the same unscrupulous
violence to maintain his rule. He had less demonic fanaticism
and remained always a sly calculator without a conscience.
His whole appearance was uncanny. While he was still in the
cradle a cock had picked out one eye, but the remaining one
glittered " like a black coal " from a face framed with blackest
hair and beard. He also was of middle height, but immensely
powerful and tough. Like all the Emperor's intimates he
made merry over the Church and her dogmas. He looked on
the Roman Church purely as a political power and the Pope as
a ridiculously petty Italian landowner, scarcely on a par with
a Pallavicini. This materialist point of view was usual amongst
men of his type in Renaissance times. The Emperor had
entrusted him with the Vicariate- General of Cremona and had
made him a gift of numerous places in these, his native terri
tories. After Frederick's death the Margrave continued the
war against the Papacy and the Guelf . Like Eccelino he fought
nominally for the Empire, but with the parts of Lombardy
which he conquered he swelled his growing Seignory and styled
himself " Vicar General in Lombardy and permanent lord of
Cremona, Pavia, Piacenza and Vercelli." Crema and Milan,
Alessandria, Tortona and Parma also obeyed the despot, whose
immense domain ultimately fell to pieces as rapidly as it had
been thrown together. When he died at seventy (also, so the
legend runs, refusing the ministrations of the Church) the
Margrave Hubert Pallavicini possessed nothing but the single
castle Busseto near Parma from which he had been wont to
sway the destinies of Lombardy.
These comrades of Frederick II were large-scale criminals,
men who made mock alike of the bliss of heaven and the pains
of hell. And each of them showed features of the Hohen-
LABOUR OF LOVE 615
staufen Emperor distorted into caricature. Frederick was the
only one of them who bore God in his breast as well as
the Devil. His immense potentialities are seen in the way
in which he developed as Hammer of the World and Scourge
of the Peoples, and yet might worthily have stood beside
Francis of Assisi and with him fought the common foe, the
degenerate Church. Frederick took care at first not to attack
the Church ; he sought to confine his quarrels to the individual
Pope. When this became impossible he changed weapons
with lightning adaptability and began to emulate the wrath of
Elijah, who "jealous for the Law slew the greedy priests of
Baal in the storm of the spirit " and embarked on a campaign
against the worldliness of the clergy. His great Reform Mani
festo followed hard on the Council of Lyons: "It was ever
our intention and our will to induce the priesthood of every
rank, not least the highest, to endure ' to the end ' as they were
of old in the early church : leading an apostolic life and
emulating their Master's humility. For such are the men who
see visions and work miracles, who heal the sick and wake the
dead, who not by force of arms but by their holiness make
kings and princes to serve them. Our priests on the other
hand are slaves to the world, drunken with self-indulgence, who
put God in the second place : the increasing stream of their
wealth has stifled their piety. To take from them these
treacherous treasures which are their burden and their curse :
THIS is A LABOUR OF LOVE." Thus Frederick wrote to the
kings of Europe and exhorted them to relieve the servants of
God of all superfluity. In this Frederick was in accord with
the mood of his time. This was the doctrine which well-nigh
caused Francis of Assisi to be condemned as a heretic : the
doctrine of return to the simplicity of apostolic times, the
Church's re-marriage to her long-forgotten spouse, poverty.
The moment seemed opportune, for the end should be like the
beginning, as Frederick expressly emphasised.
The Emperor pressed his demand further : " Whence have
our priests learned to bear arms against the Christians ? To
don their coats of mail instead of sacred garments, instead of a
shepherd's crook to wield a lance, to carry the bow and arrows
of bitterness instead of their writing reed, to think lightly of
616 A PENNILESS PETER ix
the weapons of salvation ? What assembly of God-fearing men
has commanded this and sealed it with its seal ? If anyone
doubts us let him behold the holy cardinals and archpriests who
brandish warlike weapons in the land where we bear sway !
The one styles himself a duke, a margrave another, yet a third
a count, according to the province where he rules. Did the
first disciples of Christ so arrange it ? O foolish multitude !
Ye attribute holiness unto them, ye create saints unto your
selves as imaginary as the giants of myth ! "
Frederick in this document demanded nothing less than the
abandonment by the Roman Church of all her worldly pro
perty and of all her worldly dignities : duchies, margravates
and counties. The French Revolution first brought these
demands to general fruition, though in Sicily Frederick had
succeeded in establishing the desired state of affairs. For in
his own kingdom most of the Church treasures had been con
fiscated and Frederick had long since ceased to bestow official
rank on his Sicilian clergy. It is obvious that Frederick was
not preaching the poverty of the Church from the motives of
urgent faith and piety that inspired St. Francis. It has been
the fashion to make it a reproach that Frederick wanted the
Church to be poor, not because of his zeal for God but because
he was a bad Catholic. The Emperor certainly did not espouse
the cause of Church reform for its own sake, yet reform was
part of his office, and in pursuing it Frederick was boldly ahead
of his time. St. Francis and the reforming Emperor are sud
denly near akin. Whoever sought to bring again the Augustan
age had need of a church as it had been in the days of the early
Empire. The Saint demanded the return of the primitive
Church, and his Order yet more imperatively demanded it
(for that they hoped " as a new breed of men " to oust from
office the degenerate clergy), and in so doing they unwittingly
conjured up the Augustan as well as the Apostolic age. St.
Francis, intent only on the Church's weal, had no thought for
such logic. Frederick II, however, with wider vision, saw that
his empire could absorb the greatest movement of the time,
saw indeed that the Empire of Rome could co-exist only with
a Franciscan type of pope. Frederick here anticipated the
vision of Dante : a penniless Peter as pope, side by side with
REFORM MANIFESTOS 617
him, an emperor of boundless possessions, both immediately
appointed of God. To such a pope, who by his holiness made
kings and princes to serve him, Frederick was prepared to
render — as Dante demanded — " that reverence which a first
born son must show his father, that in the light of his father's
grace he may be more powerfully resplendent throughout the
world "
We must draw attention to a remarkable turn of phrase in
one of the reform manifestos. " Our conscience is pure and
therefore God is with us/' Frederick announced to the Euro
pean kings. This is a kind of spiritual communion with God
different from that of St. Francis. A communion in virtue of
conscience, which is based on the imperial doctrine that the
Emperor is responsible for his action to God alone. This is
the layman's claim to immediacy of intercourse with God,
which not without good reason was first formulated by the last
Emperor of the Middle Ages. This doctrine preludes the
later notes of the Reformation. Yet there could hardly be a
greater contrast than lies between the two points of view. The
appeal to purity of conscience which, when taken up by the
many, served to obliterate all ranks and grades, was here a
privilege of the all-responsible Emperor who claimed it for him
self in full consciousness of his own uniqueness and accorded
it otherwise to none. In judging others Frederick held their
actions only of account. But the imperial attitude was chal
lenging ; how challenging we see from the gloss on this passage
by an astonished monk : " Believe in deeds ! "
Frederick had described his campaign against the Church as
a " labour of love," and we need feel no surprise that the
mendicant orders hailed his tribunal as just, and hoped that the
final era of peace and repose was now about to dawn. The
growing hostility between the regular clergy and the orders
became Frederick's ally, and many, both Franciscans and
Dominicans, supported him against the clergy. In opposition
to the prevailing belief that Antichrist would come from with
out to attack the Church, many saw the destroyer within the
bosom of the Church herself.
618 HERETIC POPE ix
One of the mendicants, Brother Arnold, demonstrated in a
document bearing the title " Innocent IV, Antichrist," that the
words " Innocentius Papa " yielded the number 666, and that,
therefore, the Pope was Antichrist. In another highly emotional
pamphlet the same writer espoused the Emperor's cause. He
asserted that God had revealed to him in a vision that it was
the divine intention to renew Holy Church and to lead her back
to her original purity. Thus instructed, Brother Arnold had,
he reported, betaken himself to Kaiser Frederick, who had
investigated the vision with the advice of wise and learned men,
and being himself a Catholic free from all unfaith, the Emperor
had approved the reformation of the Church as a most pious
work. After forty days of mystic rapture Christ himself
vouchsafed a vision to the monk, and revealed to him that the
Pope and the papalists were the real enemies of God and the
destroyers of the Gospel, and that the Lord had expelled them
from the community of the faithful.
Many shared Brother Arnold's belief, and the cry " Heretic
Pope " was heard unceasingly till the Reformation. It was
particularly loud in Germany. In Hall in Swabia and in other
places wandering preachers announced to thronging listeners :
" the Pope is a heretic ; the prelates are simonists ; the priests
are unworthy to bind or to loose ; papal indulgences are value
less and the Pope leads a perverted life and sets an example of
evil." " Pray therefore," the preachers concluded, " for the
Lord, Kaiser Frederick and for Conrad his son, for they are
perfect and they are just."
The Emperor's reform manifestos were particularly popular
in Germany. Wild abusive pamphlets attacked the clergy,
" spouses of luxury who shirk marriage " ; one in its wrath
struck the very note of imperial utterances : " 0 the blind
unenlightened simplicity of you Christian people ! Why be
ye deceived by such trickery ! Arise, arise, ye monarchs of the
earth. Arise, ye princes ! Arise, ye peoples, open your eyes
and see ! Endure no longer the disgrace of such enmity.
Root out this diseased multitude from the earth who bring
confusion and contamination ! Reform Holy Church dis-
CHURCH REFORM 619
figured by such crimes ! And when the evil leaven of crime
and wickedness is swept away may a new yeast begin to work
in purity and truth and faith ! "
Such voices could not alter the outcome of the strife and no
rising of the masses was at that period to be hoped for. But
it is idle to pretend, as some have done, that Frederick was
" misunderstood " by his contemporaries. Frederick must
have been perfectly aware that his reforming manifestos could
not shatter the Papacy ; he probably did not even wish that
they should, for without a World Church the World Empire
would cease. But he pushed the campaign to the uttermost,
and the seed he sowed took root even in his own day. With
his instinct for a living force Frederick seized on these ideas
and flung them into the conflict between mind and might, to
germinate for centuries. The hopes of earnest men in Ger
many who sought reform were for all time linked with the name
of Frederick II Hohenstaufen. Men dreamt that he would
some day return, in all his glory, to reform the corruption of
the Church, and would pursue the Roman hierarchy so savagely
that they would hide their tonsures with cow dung if they
could find no other covering.
Perhaps it was especially to make impression on the Germans
that Frederick let loose the terrors of the Angel of Death and
of Antichrist. Germany is quicker to recognise the good than
the beautiful ; perhaps it would not otherwise have recognised
the Emperor as Saviour. The Pope's procedure gave new food
for such reflections. Germany was drawn into the strife to a
greater degree than before and suffered bitterly under the
Curia's persecutions.
Up till the Council of Lyons Germany had felt relatively
little of the great strife between Papacy and Empire. The
church agitation had exercised little influence, although in 1239,
just before the Emperor's excommunication, the papal legate,
Albert of Bohemia, had succeeded in organising an opposi
tion amongst the princes : Bohemia, Bavaria and Austria had
formed the Confederation of Passau against Frederick. But it
broke up within a few months. Bohemia and Austria came to
620 BISHOPS OF THE RHINE ix
terms with the Emperor, and the Duke of Bavaria was left alone.
Not even the Bavarian clergy had gone over to the Pope,
doubtless because the bishops were hostile to the Duke and
therefore remained imperialist. The bishop of Ratisbon openly
defied the Pope's legate ; the bishop of Brixen barricaded the
street against the papal messenger ; the bishop of Freising
denied the Pope any jurisdiction whatever in Germany, and
the archbishop of Salzburg trampled a papal letter under foot.
Princes and towns sent auxiliaries and money to the Emperor
in Italy. Finally, even the Duke of Bavaria abandoned his
hostility, for the Mongol peril which threatened his neighbours
Bohemia, Hungary and Austria, diverted his attention. The
propaganda of the Curia seemed to have been in vain.
A slight weakening might, however, have been observed in
quite another quarter : on the Rhine. The great archbishop
of Cologne, Conrad of Hochstaden, is famous as the founder
and builder of the great cathedral, whose foundation-stone he
laid in 1248. In those days he was no less famous as a warrior,
a wild quarrelsome fellow who, like all the German princes,
bent his whole mind to his territorial policy and lived in
perpetual conflict with his neighbours on the lower Rhine.
Through these quarrels he presently fell foul of the imperial
government, which lent an ear to the complaints of the princes,
and the Archbishop of Cologne was declared an enemy of the
Empire. Finding himself single-handed Conrad of Hoch
staden ultimately found an ally in the scarcely less powerful
Sigfrid, archbishop of Mainz, whom Frederick had appointed
Regent in Germany. The archbishop of Mainz had long been
at odds with the Duke of Bavaria about the Abbey of Lorsch,
which Mainz had hopes of retaining as long as Bavaria was
hostile to the Emperor. When, however, the Duke of Bavaria
began veering towards friendship with the Emperor the arch
bishop of Mainz saw his Abbey of Lorsch imperilled. Weighed
against this he recked little of the regency. He and Cologne
could both be certain of papal support if they deserted the
Emperor, and so the two formed an alliance. Henceforth they
both proclaimed the ban against Frederick and invaded the
Hohenstaufen territory of Wetterau with fire and sword. Thus
Innocent IV found a German group hostile to Frederick among
POPE AND GERMAN CHURCH 621
the Rhine archbishops and their suffragans. It was now one
of the chief aims of papal politics to increase their adherents.
Innocent systematically began trying to seduce the German
Church in every rank from its loyalty to the Hohenstaufen.
The papal methods were forceful. The imperialist bishops
were deposed where possible, and in the cathedrals the
imperialist canons degraded. After the Council of Lyons the
following dignitaries were involved in deposition proceedings :
the archbishops of Salzburg and Bremen ; the bishops of
Passau, Freising, Brixen, Utrecht, Prague, Worms, Constance,
Augsburg, Paderborn and Hildesheim ; the abbots of St. Gall,
Ellwangen, Reichenau, Kempten and Weissenburg. Further
proceedings were pending against the bishops of Magdeburg,
Chur and Trent, and against innumerable priests. Many, like
the bishops of Olmutz and Passau, were deposed, and many
voluntarily resigned so as not to turn traitor. Their places
were filled by creatures of the Pope. Others went over to
Innocent and were duly rewarded. The German clergy speedily
became wholly dependent on the Curia, as the great Innocent
had once intended. Any free election by convent or chapter
was expressly forbidden, and the bishops were nominated by
the Pope just as were Vicars General and podestas by Frederick.
The Emperor exercised his right of appointment down to the
lowest ranks, and now Innocent also supervised the appoint
ment of the meanest clergy. Even before a benefice was vacant
its next incumbent was frequently designated.
These reversions to posts in the Church were often granted
in exchange for payment of a tax, a procedure not far removed
from simony. Other measures again led to the infamous traffic
in indulgences. Masses of mendicant monks were carefully
instructed and despatched to spread the news of the excom
munication and deposition far and wide, for which purpose they
were to make use of every convenient opportunity : processions,
fairs, markets and the like. They were to follow each sermon
by a summons to all to take the cross against Frederick. In
order not to stultify the crusade against Frederick and his sons
Pope Innocent most strictly but secretly enjoined on them not
622 INDULGENCES ix
by any chance to preach a crusade to the Holy Land : and this
at the very juncture when Louis of France was preparing to
set out on the sixth Crusade. An indulgence of forty to fifty
days was earned by merely listening to a crusading sermon
against Frederick, and those who took the cross received the
same indulgences as those who fought the Saracens. If they
later chose to redeem their vow by a money payment the in
dulgence for sin still held good, and many took the cross solely
with the intention of acquiring the indulgence and then re
purchasing their freedom. This procedure was not an entirely
novel device. It had long been possible to purchase absolution
from a crusading vow. Hitherto, however, the moneys thus
amassed had been devoted to the prosecution of the crusade,
whereas now they simply spelt a new source of revenue for the
Church and a new weapon against the Emperor. The moment
the fiction of a crusade was at an end, and indulgences were
simply bartered for money, that traffic was in full swing which
ultimately gave the impetus to the great schism of the sixteenth
century, the Reformation.
The Pope's activities extended far beyond Germany. He
had at his command the highly-ramified organisation of the
Roman Church extending through the whole Christian world,
and, between promises for this world and threatenings for the
next, all kinds of hitherto unexploited sources of supply could
be tapped and new partisans be won. There was no command
in the Canon from which Innocent would not grant dispensa
tion, no Church law which could not be circumvented, no
ecclesiastical crime which could not be condoned if it seemed
profitable for the campaign against the Hohenstaufen brood.
To procure adherents the Pope began to distribute the property
of the church as a feudal prince his fiefs : whoever performed
a service for him received a " promissory note " so to speak on
the next vacant benefice or see wherever situate. Spaniards
might thus acquire a church in England or Germany, or the
revenues thereof. Needless to say most of these foreign bene
fices fell to Italians whom the Pope himself required for the
immediate war against the Emperor. These Italians frequently
never even saw their cures, they were concerned only to collect
the revenues, and the multiplication of benefices, which was
CHURCH PATRONAGE 623
an ancient abuse sternly condemned by canon law, became a
favourite device of the Pope's to attract new or to fortify old
loyalties. The fifths, tenths and twentieths which the Pope
issued were endless. These creatures of the Pope were
strangers and entirely indifferent to the fate of the flocks
allotted to them ; they found no fault with the principle. They
acquiesced readily enough in the demands made on them for
money, for by such levies they could reap advantage for
themselves.
These interferences of the Pope aroused acute bitterness in
England and in France. Innocent, however, had not so free
a hand in those countries as in Germany, where the spiritual
princes were " pillars of the State " to a degree unknown else
where in Christendom, and where, therefore, systematic resis
tance was scarcely conceivable. In Germany, therefore, the
papal rod was severely felt. In dioceses whose incumbent was
not a papalist, all divine service ceased for years together, and
no baptism, no marriage, no confirmation and no burial service
could take place. No member of an imperialist family could
take holy orders, and all supporters of the Hohenstaufen were
cut off from Church fiefs and leases. In such circumstances
everything fell far more seriously into decay in Germany than
in Italy, where interdicts were frequently in force for years,
but where people took a more commonsense view of religious
matters. Similar conditions produced, therefore, very different
consequences north and south of the Alps.
All these arrangements were made on a uniform system by
the Curia from the base of Lyons, which was now the centre
of the ecclesiastical web, whose threads Pope Innocent mani
pulated with consummate mastery. The Pope, indeed, showed
himself an expert ; he also was a transformer of energies, skilled
in utilising intangible forces, in translating spiritual into tem
poral advantage : into political, military and financial power.
One thing was needful : an unscrupulous readiness to turn
every available force to account. If we conceive the Church
as a purely political power which was- face to face with unpre
cedented political and military tasks, we must reckon the
624 PAPAL CYNICISM ix
Genoese as one of the most brilliant politicians who ever
occupied the papal throne. Without a shadow of misgiving he
put out his spiritual talent to usury and opened for the moment
innumerable and unexhausted sources of revenue. There is
something truly great in the way Pope Innocent silenced every
scruple, stifled every sentimental qualm in pursuit of his one
goal : the annihilation of the Hohenstaufen. He was no hypo
crite ; he did not even seek to keep up appearances ; he did
not even trouble to mask his features, which expressed frank
scorn for every rule of canon law. He broke or evaded or
altered every canon at will, introducing into the Papacy a
" macchiavellian " trait which placed immediate expediency
before all law, human or divine. This was a new type of pope,
who had little in common with his warlike Caesar predecessors.
The various reactions of the world at large to this new tendency
are characteristic. In Germany this betrayal of ideals awakened
bitterness, sorrow, detestation. The materialisation of the
Church provoked by contrast the more intensive spiritualisation
of religion and led ultimately to the Reformation and the renewal
of Christendom. Whereas in Italy this conduct of the Popes
gave birth to an unfathomable cynicism which brought with it
the rebirth of paganism : the Renaissance.
Meanwhile the main theatre of war was Italy, where after
the Pope's flight the mighty figure of the Emperor Frederick
held the field and fought the fight for life and empire. North
of the Alps Pope Innocent's efforts aimed at undermining the
Emperor's sovereignty, south of the Alps his covert attacks
were directed against the Emperor's person. In Italy the papal
machinations were secret and difficult to counter, and the per
sonal danger necessitated the most terrible severity. It was
hard enough at any time to impose internal order on Italian
party strife, and the Pope's myrmidons had no difficult task
to stir up opposition. All the forces of disorder which had at
such cost been calmed and quelled were released again by the
papal agitators. Every political, social, religious, economic dis
content was fostered and exploited by the Church, which
distributed gold and promises without stint. In these circum-
RUTHLESSNESS 625
stances the Emperor could keep up any semblance of control
in the State only by extreme harshness and even cruelty.
Discipline became more and more difficult to maintain ;
treachery and defection were rife, and murder instigated by
the Pope threatened the Emperor's life.
All the communes with few exceptions were untrustworthy.
Even in the Ghibelline towns the opposition party was strong,
and if the Guelfs gained the upper hand in one town a whole
series of friendly and related towns forthwith fell away also.
Conversely, of course, the accession of an important town to the
Emperor's cause exercised widespread influence. Yet when
one town was with difficulty reduced to allegiance, rebellion
fanned by the Pope flamed up in three others, and no sooner had
the Emperor gathered a stronger force than usual for some big
undertaking than an unforeseen revolt broke out in another
quarter, and his efforts were frittered in fruitless fighting. He
made oath " never shall we sheathe the sword we have un-
scabbarded till the hydra of rebellion whose reborn heads are
charged with overflowing ruin, challenging the very existence
of the Imperium, shall have been visited with mighty punish
ment . . .", but nevertheless he could not alter the fact that for
long periods whole provinces like the Romagna or the Marches
were lost to him. At moments during the last five years the
general situation in Italy seemed more favourable to the
Emperor than ever before. But such conjunctions of the stars
were dearly bought !
The repressive measures of the Emperor grew severer year
by year. The mistrust of a naturally mistrustful monarch was
nourished by one ugly occurrence after another. Any town
that he entered had immediately to give hostages, and these
were carried off to Apulian prisons to be slaughtered at the
first symptom of revolt. Anyone who showed letters from the
Pope lost hands and feet. The Emperor recognised rebels only,
not enemies ; hence every non-imperialist found armed was
hanged. Places that were suspect might expect any fate.
Occasional miscarriage of justice was not unknown : a pair of
knights from the March were caught and hanged — they had
been on their way to join the Emperor's army. It is said that
a tiny mark was sometimes put on a suspect's back without his
626 SAVAGERY ix
knowledge so that the imperial spies might keep their eye on
him. One nobleman fell under suspicion because when his
native town went over to the enemy his tower was left standing.
Frederick sardonically opined that both he and the tower-
owner must be much beloved since the imperial palace was also
spared. The noble smiled a forced smile but disregarded his
friends' warnings, and on the next breath of suspicion found
himself at the bottom of the sea with a millstone round his neck.
Even the good faith of loyal towns like Pisa and Lucca had to
be purchased. The Emperor handed over to them the terri
tories of the Lunigiana and Garfagnana which King Enzio had
promised them. He even promised the Cremonese to make
their town the capital of Italy in place of Rome. His treatment
of prisoners was ruthless. In his manifestos he boasted, for
instance, that he had had three hundred Mantuans hanged along
the banks of the Po, or again that he had prevented the defec
tion of Reggio by publicly beheading a hundred revolutionaries.
Before the end the word " mercy " had been deleted from his
vocabulary. Some noble Florentine Guelfs defended them
selves in the Tuscan fortress of Capraio and surrendered after
a short siege. Some were hanged on the spot; some were
taken in chains to Naples, blinded, mutilated and flung into the
sea. Only one of the most distinguished was blinded and
released and sent to the barren island of Monte Christo to end
his days as a monk.
Frederick thus sought to defend himself by terror against the
host of minor foes. Since the Pope's flight he had no " big
enemy " in Italy and the struggle had changed its character.
He was no longer fighting as in the days of Gregory IX as
Emperor against the Pope in person. Frederick II and the
House of Hohenstaufen were now fighting with tangible
weapons against intangible opponents : Papacy and Church.
Formerly the Italian continent had been too narrow for the two
world powers, now Frederick II filled the space alone, while
Innocent had vacated the scene of battle and from Lyons was
driving his subterranean tunnels, mining the very ground
beneath the Emperor's feet, instead of meeting him in the open
field. Frederick lacked a visible enemy and a definite point
of attack. He could no longer cross swords with the Pope ;
CALL OF THE EAST 627
the fight now raged to and fro between the Emperor and his
own subjects whom the Pope seduced. Whenever Frederick
attempted a march towards Lyons or into Germany, so as to
be again face to face with the foe and to escape the almost
intolerable tension — " would that our hand had someone to
conquer ! " — some insurrection or another drew him back into
the vortex of Italian strife. He remained for ever chained to
the Apennines. Never again was he able to try his strength
in the more distant spaces of the Empire. Whether or not he
groaned " O felix Asia ! " the worm gnawed remorselessly at
his vitals.
Under this strain, in the hampering conditions of this ignoble
struggle against the plots and intrigues of rebels and priests, a
craving suddenly flashed out to bid the west good-bye and to
seek again the alluring spaces of the east. The later Napoleon
felt it too : " I should have been wiser to have stayed in Egypt.
By now I should have been Emperor of the whole East/5 he
exclaimed at the sight of St. Helena. In a letter to the Nicaean
Emperor Vatatzes, after various complaints against revolu
tionaries and deceitful priests who dared to depose a king,
Frederick wrote : " But such things happen more easily in our
western lands ! O happy Asia ! O happy rulers of the Orient !
who fear neither the dagger of the rebel nor the superstitions
invented by the priest ! " Such an outburst of personal feeling
was rare in Frederick's state correspondence. It tallies with
the legend that he had contemplated abdication and dreamt
of betaking himself for ever to the east, promising to conquer
the whole of Syria. A new Empire in the Orient, now that he
had exhausted what the narrow west could offer ; intercourse
with Muslim friends ; subjects whose only thought was blind
obedience even unto death — these were the Emperor's castles
in the air. Such a journey to the east as he desired was not
to be. In another fashion, more bitter than the resignation of
a throne, than a gradual retreat towards the east, he was to be
gradually weaned from the men and things and states of this
world.
Within a few weeks of the Council of Lyons Frederick saw
628 ORLANDO DI ROSSI ix
in what quarter the danger-clouds were gathering. Treacherous
documents, including plans for the assassination of the Emperor
and of King Enzio, were discovered in the monastery of Fonte-
vivo near Parma. Parma was implicated, and when Frederick
hastily repaired thither to prevent the defection of this impor
tant town he made the further discovery that Bernardo Orlando
di Rossi, the Pope's brother-in-law, with a number of Guelf
knights had fled from Parma in the direction of Piacenza and
Milan.
Orlando di Rossi had been hitherto one of the professed
supporters of Frederick II. He was an important personality,
well known throughout upper Italy, for he had frequently held
the office of podesta in imperial towns. His countryman, Fra
Salimbene, the mendicant of Parma, describes him thus : " I
never saw a man who looked so perfectly the part of an illus
trious prince." Orlando had a most impressive exterior which
his courage did not belie. When he appeared, armed, in the
battle, and laid about him right and left, felling the foe with a
heavy iron club, men fled as from the devil incarnate, and Fra
Salimbene was fain to recall the exploits of Charles the Great :
" according to what is recorded of Charlemagne and what I
with mine own eyes saw of Orlando.'' Orlando di Rossi be
longed to the cultured men of his time. As podesta of Siena
he instituted a sort of town history in which he proposed to
record : " the victories and triumphs for undying memory,"
as the Scipios had painted the deeds of their forefathers upon
their doorposts to be inspired thereby to the conquest of the
earth. Orlando has taken this anecdote with misunderstand
ings from Sallust. With such style and bearing and mentality
it was natural that Orlando should be one of Frederick's more
intimate circle — they were, moreover, related — and it was one
of the contributory considerations influencing the choice of
Sinibaldo Fiesco as Pope that Orlando di Rossi was his brother-
in-law. Soon after the papal flight a breath of distrust towards
the Pope's friends in Parma must have crept over Frederick.
He certainly despatched Piero della Vigna to Parma at the
time to ensure the town's allegiance. But in spite of mis
givings Frederick acquiesced in the choice of Orlando di
Rossi as podesta of Florence for 1244. It could only produce
FREDERICK AND HIS VICARS 629
a reassuring impression during the progress of the peace
negotiations if the Pope's brother-in-law was holding office in
one of the most important of the imperial towns. But this
time the game went wrong. Instead of Orlando's winning the
Pope over to the Emperor's side the Pope converted his
brother-in-law to the Guelfs. Orlando di Rossi openly betrayed
the Emperor. Frederick felt the blow severely, but this was
only the prelude to the great conspiracy amongst his intimates
which followed a few months later.
There is no doubt that service under a ruler like Frederick II
was anything but a sinecure. All private life came to a stand
still for the imperial vicars as it did for the marshals of Napoleon.
Their life was consecrated wholly to the service of the State
and of the Emperor, and that service was wearing, difficult and
dangerous. The relationship of vicar to Emperor was one of
extreme delicacy. On the one hand the vicar had the fullest
responsibility and almost unlimited powers, on the other
Frederick never abandoned towards any man a certain sus
picion, all officials were watched, and the Emperor would
intervene at any moment in the administration. Considering
the great independence of the officials and the precariousness
of Frederick's exalted position this was most natural, but
friction was inevitable. Sometimes the Emperor was over
vigorous ; sometimes the official was unduly sensitive. Most
of the vicars had known their master from their youth up ; they
knew his distrust, they knew his watchfulness, and on their side
they brought suspicion to bear, often most unfairly, on every
utterance of the Emperor's. The nagging and the eternal
discontent of the Napoleonic marshals offer a parallel. The
sensitiveness and querulousness of his trusty intimates indulged
even at critical moments aroused at times Frederick's impatient
wrath. In a letter referring to some question of accounts the
Emperor wrote to Piero della Vigna the innocent words " be
diligent and attentive in the matter as is thy wont." Della Vigna
was deeply hurt by the phrase and wrote back that all the praise
contained in the imperial letter amounted to the exact opposite.
Frederick would seem to consider him lazy and careless, which
630 A ROYAL APOLOGY ix
must be based on slander. . . . Whereupon Frederick only
threatened his friend with his serious anger for daring to bring
such ridiculous accusations against his Emperor.
It is quite possible, however, that the Emperor was at times
really unjust tp one or another, especially in those years of
strain and stress. This was only to be expected, but there
often reigned at Court a dangerous atmosphere, and visitors
used with foresight to inform themselves about the current
temperature. Frederick was neither obstinate nor petty. He
never clung to a mistake, and there is something deeply moving
in the words he writes at a time of terrible anxiety to a well-
beloved Captain of Sicily, Andrew Cicala, soothing and
encouraging him, acknowledging a blunder and apologising
for it unreservedly and with gracious dignity : " The unfor
tunate words which caused you pain and so suddenly upset the
calm of your firm mind, sprang from a mood of wrath and
irritation. We are all the more rejoiced that thy well-tried
uprightness and good-faith remained unshaken by such idle
words. The more strongly thou feelest such unjust phrases
the more steadfast and sure is thy constancy, one of the bastions
of thy incorruptible loyalty, the proof whereof lies with thine
own memorable deeds and with our pure and constant trust —
more solemn testimony than any outside witness ! Need we
say more . . . canst thou still find room to doubt . . . apart
from the subtle signs of affection which the eyes cannot see,
thou must be conscious of our trust since we leave our cares in
thy hands and rely on thee as on a second self. If aught of thy
vexation still remain banish the last remnants thereof, and when
the rust of doubt has been polished away, believe in the con
stancy of our unaltered regard. As we on our side trust that
thy good faith to us is immutable, thou for thy part must not
doubt that our favour and our grace are thine unchangeably."
The distrust of his officials 1 The fact that distrust was
possible ! In this Frederick saw the greatest menace of all.
Nothing is recorded of the Emperor's grief at the petty irrita
bility of his friends, the deeper underlying causes of which he
did not fail to fathom ; we are not told how often he comforted
them by a letter like the foregoing, or oftener yet by a talk,
many a time by a mere glance, and once again renewed the
1245-6 FREDERICK OF ANTIOCH 631
spell that bound them to him, the charm by which he first had
won them. It is one of the fateful penalties of greatness that
the magic of a personality by becoming a daily commonplace
loses its power most readily over the nearest intimates. The
spell that still can bind the stranger plays false at home. No
great monarch but has been the victim of a friend's treachery.
Such treachery springs not from hostility and hate but from
weakness and cowardice. The traitor too incompetent to
sustain for long the demands of office ; too weak to bear the
continuous presence of the great man ; too cowardly to avow
weakness and incompetence ; and, again, too vain and self-
seeking to resign the service, not lacking withal in genuine love,
admiration, reverence for the Master — the intolerable burden
of such a conflict drives sometimes the nearest to deceit and
treachery. One renegade who at a critical moment thus
throws scruple to the winds easily becomes the seducer of the
wavering. Such was Orlando di Rossi's role.
From Parma Frederick II had taken steps to avert the
threatening defection of Reggio. He had then embarked on a
campaign of devastation against Milan, but he did not succeed
in coming to grips with the Milanese army, and during the
winter of 1245-46 he made Grosseto on the coast of Tuscany
his headquarters for several months. The district of the
Maremma promised good hawking, and at the same time the
Emperor could supervise Tuscany more closely. Various
irregularities had appeared in the administration, and the
venality of several authorities had come to light. Frederick
was obliged first to recall the Apulian Pandulf of Fasanella, who
for many years had been Vicar General of the difficult province
of Tuscany, and to replace him by the imperial bastard Frede
rick of Antioch, whom people soon styled King of Tuscany.
Frederick of Antioch must have then been a youth of about
twenty : competent, energetic, cautious, equal to the delicate
conditions in Tuscany, a courageous warrior, a poet who could
write tender canzones, a man of such gracious and charming
personality that people forgot that he was lame. Men liked to
believe that his mother had been the sister of al Kamil, a lady
632 CONSPIRACY OF INTIMATES ix
whom the Emperor had met on his first Crusade, but who had
refused his advances until Frederick arranged for a black-sailed
ship to sail into the Syrian harbour bearing news of the
Empress's death. . . . This was pure fiction. Nothing was
known of Frederick of Antioch's mother.
The following events stand in intimate relation to the
removal of Pandulf. The preceding year he and Orlando di
Rossi, who was thtnpodesta of Florence, had worked together
in Tuscany. It was the custom that the higher officials when
temporarily unemployed should take up their quarters at
Frederick's court and place themselves at the Emperor's dis
posal. Pandulf, therefore, betook himself to court after his
recall. Some weeks passed. In March 1246 a boat arrived
in Grosseto, sent in haste by Count Richard of Caserta, the
Emperor's son-in-law. It brought word of a widespread con
spiracy against the life of Frederick and King Enzio. It
arrived at the eleventh hour. The crime was scheduled for
the morrow. Natural phenomena were already foretelling some
monstrous catastrophe, which the astrologer Guido Bonatti
claimed also to have foreseen. Sun and moon disappeared,
the stars turned pale, the heavens rained blood, the earth was
enveloped in thick darkness amidst lightning and thunder, the
sea ran mountains high. Terror seized those of the conspirators
who were at court. Before the Emperor could institute in
vestigations they fled to Rome, having been warned in time.
Amongst them were two of the most distinguished leaders,
Pandulf of Fasanella and Jacob of Morra. The latter was one
of Frederick's most trusted intimates, Vicar General of the
March, a son of the recently deceased Chief Justice, Henry
of Morra.
The flight of the two conspirators confirmed Count Caserta's
warning. The Emperor learnt at the same time that the con
spiracy had spread through much wider circles. The prime
mover in the plot was Orlando di Rossi. He had not only
enlisted Pandulf of Fasanella beforehand in Florence, but had
induced the imperial podesta of Parma, Tebaldo Francisco, to
join them. Francisco, who had been for years Vicar General
of the March of Treviso, one of the most eminent of Frederick's
officials and one of his most intimate friends, was generally
PARRICIDES 633
considered to be the head of the conspirators. When Tebaldo
got news that the Grosseto scheme had failed he fled to Sicily,
being in secret correspondence with Andrew of Cicala, Captain
of Sicily. Apparently Roger de Amicis, Captain of the Island,
was also in league with the conspirators. Like Jacob of Morra
he was famous as one of the first poets in the Sicilian vernacular.
The conspirators were thus one and all men who had for years
discharged the highest offices in the State, and ruled the most
important provinces, men who on the human side stood nearest
to the Emperor and enjoyed his fullest confidence. A few were
subordinate officials, relations for the most part of the bigger
men : Richard and Robert of Fasanella, William Franciscus,
Godfrey of Morra. In Sicily itself some non-officials had
joined the plot from personal motives : the Counts of San
Severino ; they had unquestionably always been badly treated
by the Emperor.
The discovery that his nearest friends had been seeking his
life had, naturally, a profound effect on Frederick. It made
him shudder, he wrote, to think that these men were actually
plotting the deed of shame at the very moment that they were
dining at the same table with him and conversing amiably with
him in his rooms at court. With a father's pride he had watched
them grow up, he had exalted them from the lowliest stations
to the highest posts of honour at Caesar's court, he had treated
them with so much affection that he kept no secrets from them,
he trusted them as fully as he trusted the sons of his body, he
had even chosen them to be his bodyguard, and many a time
had laid his head in their lap. " Parricides " he called the
recreants, stepsons, not sons. . . . They were men recognising
no human tie, miscreants who criminally plotted the death of
their benefactor. With them a new human type had come to
birth : a human form with animal instincts only.
Faced with danger the Emperor showed himself possessed
of all his old vigour and power : as he had need to be. The
plan had wide ramifications. Frederick and Enzio and Ecce-
lino were to have been murdered at a banquet ; Parma was to
have gone over to the enemy. Already the Emperor's old foe,
634 VENGEANCE ix
Rainer of Viterbo, called in by one of the traitors, had invaded
the imperial territories at the head of a papal army. He was,
completely defeated with heavy losses at Spello by Marinus of
Eboli, Vicar General of Spoleto, who had remained faithful.
The worst was, however, that the traitors had stirred up an
insurrection and produced general confusion throughout Sicily
by the news which they spread broadcast that the Emperor
was dead. They had got possession of the fortresses of Sala
and Capaccio and the town of Altavilla. Thus the centre of
the revolt was in the heart of Frederick's hereditary kingdom
in southern Campania between Paestum and Salerno.
Frederick immediately hastened southward from Tuscany :
" the apple of his eye must not suffer harm ! " The loyal
Sicilians, even before their master's arrival, had independently
cut off the two fortresses, so that Sala surrendered to the
Emperor after a few days. Altavilla was taken by storm and
razed to the ground, and anyone related even remotely to the
conspirators was blinded and burnt alive. The Emperor's
arrival in person immediately quelled what remained of the
revolt. Only the citadel of Capaccio, which the ringleaders
were defending, still held out, although the town was in the
Emperor's hands. The heat of July was extreme, water sup
plies gave out, and the besiegers' catapults began to do greater
and greater execution. The citadel could not be saved ; the
garrison surrendered. To his amazement Frederick found
amongst the hundred and fifty prisoners the leaders of the con
spiracy themselves, especially Tebaldo Francisco. Frederick
seems to have expected that they would have fallen on their
own swords or leapt from the crags, preferring self-chosen
death to the vengeance of their outraged master. Since they
did not, he felt them at his mercy.
Their punishment fitted their crime. They were blinded
with red-hot irons that they might not see their lord, and
mutilated in noses, hands and legs, and thus the sometime
friends were brought before their ruthless judge. According
to the Lex Pompeia Frederick had them condemned for murder
and treated them as parricides. They had committed a crime
" against nature " and therefore were put to death by all four
elements. Some were dragged to death by horses over stony
INSTIGATOR OF ASSASSINS 635
ground, others burnt alive, others were hanged, the rest sewn
up in leather sacks and thrown out into the sea, following the
Roman treatment of parracides. Frederick added a symbolical
refinement by having poisonous snakes sewn up in the sacks
with them.
Frederick made an exception of Tebaldo Francisco, the arch-
villain of the piece. He and five others were to be blinded and
mutilated and dragged through all the countries of the earth
from town to town to all kings and princes so that the earth
might see the monster. " Let the punishment of this accursed
criminal instruct your minds and spirits by the sight of the eye
which makes more impression than what is heard by the ear.
Let no forgetfulness obliterate what ye have seen, let the
memory of a just judgment be remembered." A papal bull
was tied to the traitor's forehead so that all the world might
know the instigator of the murderous plot : Innocent IV.
Frederick had long had no doubts left in his mind that the
High Priest was the ultimate assassin. The threads of the
conspiracy were spun in Lyons. " We would fain," he wrote,
" have kept silence about the name and title of our foe, but
transparent facts make the accusation, and public opinion lays
it bare and declares the name our silence is shielding, and the
cloak of our words excusing." The Emperor was able to
announce that the first prisoners, not under torture but volun
tarily in making their last confession, had admitted that they
had taken the cross against Frederick from the hands of men
dicant monks, and that they had been authorised to act as they
did by letters from the Pope.
The Emperor further made known that his enemy the Bishop
of Bamberg, coming from the Pope at Lyons, had openly
declared in Germany that Frederick II was about to die a
shameful death at the hands of his friends and intimates.
Other indications : Orlando di Rossi's leading part ; the par
ticipation of the podesta of Parma, the instantaneous invasion
of Cardinal Rainer, and many another thing pointed clearly to
the papal Curia's being implicated. The extant documents of
the cardinals leave no doubt alive to-day that Innocent IV, who
636 HENRY RASPE ix
had been inviting everyone " to wash his hands in the blood of
this sinner," had at the very least minute knowledge of the
plan. No one else could so promptly profit by the Emperor's
death.
It is unprecedented in medieval history that a pope should
actually set out to have an Emperor murdered. Within the
framework of Innocent's total policy this attempt on Frederick's
life is only one ingredient in a great scheme. The spring of
1246 was to mark the opening of a general papal offensive
destined to smash the Hohenstaufen influence simultaneously
in every country of the Empire : in Sicily, in Germany, in
Italy. With the battle-cry "to free the oppressed" papal
legates with troops furnished by the citizens of Rome were to
invade the kingdom of Sicily immediately on Frederick's death
— an easy matter since the Vicars General and the highest
officials were among the conspirators. Parma was the centre
for Italy, where Tebaldo Francisco was the faithless imperial
podesta. He had been promised the rule of Sicily, ostensibly
in the Pope's name. The inclusion of Enzio and Eccelino in
the plan shows that the fall of the Hohenstaufen rule was the
real goal. The murder of the Emperor himself was the task
allotted to the nobles remaining at court. In Germany the
establishment of a rival king was expected to produce the fall
of Conrad. No one seems to have reckoned with a possible
miscarriage of the plot.
The Pope's whole elaborate plan was wrecked by the timely
discovery of the conspiracy, at least as far as Sicily and Italy
was concerned. In Germany the Pope had a momentary suc
cess. Gregory IX's efforts to set up a rival king had all fallen
to the ground. Innocent IV had now set the election to work.
He had closed the decree of deposition with the request that
the electors should forthwith proceed to choose another prince
to fill the place of the deposed Emperor. Pope Innocent even
found an aspirant : the Thuringian Landgrave Henry Raspe,
whom the Emperor had appointed a few years before to succeed
the Archbishop Sigfrid of Mainz as Regent of the Empire.
Raspe at first protested, but Innocent appears to have over
come his reluctance by the news of the impending murder of
Frederick. The Landgrave ultimately consented to his eleva-
REX CLERICORUM 637
tion, and in May 1246, while the Emperor was still fighting in
Campania against the conspirators, Henry Raspe was elected
in Veitschochheim, near Wlirzburg, King of the Romans, or
Rex Clericorum as the people mockingly said, for no single
secular elector was present, and only a small number of spiritual
princes.
The Landgrave was never either anointed or crowned. For
his acceptance of the crown the rival king had received from
the Pope the not inconsiderable sum of 25,000 silver marks.
The number of his supporters was negligible, but with further
subsidies from the Curia he contrived to achieve a Surprising
though short-lived success. A few months after his elevation
the " Battle of the Kings " took place near Frankfurt. The
Thuringian king, Henry Raspe, and the Hohenstaufen king,
Conrad IV, strove for victory. King Conrad's army was
superior in numbers. But immediately before the onslaught
two-thirds of the Hohenstaufen forces, led by a Swabian noble,
went over to the enemy. The Pope had bought them for 6000
marks and promised them the Dukedom of Swabia, as he also
promised Sicily to the unhappy Tebaldo Francisco. The Land
grave won the battle of Frankfurt, and forthwith a victory
proclamation on the imperial model went forth to " our faithful
Milan," prophesying a speedy victory over King Conrad's
father. It concluded with a familiar turn of phrase " we shall
triumph as the Emperors of Rome are wont to do." Even the
puppet king had " learnt."
The victory decided nothing. The Landgrave's recognition
was strictly limited, and a few months later, in February 1247,
Henry Raspe died, to the great inconvenience of the Church.
It is unlikely that he would have accomplished anything of real
value. King Conrad at this point married Elizabeth of Bavaria,
to put an end once and for all to the Bavarian-Hohenstaufen
friction, and in this same year the Duke of Austria died and the
Emperor resumed his territories. The route to Italy was thus
barred by an unbroken Hohenstaufen barrier from Alsace to
Austria. Yet there was no peace for King Conrad. The
German situation grew yearly more difficult, and in the endless
fighting almost the only allies on whom the young king could
count were the towns who were the natural enemies of secular
638 WILLIAM OF HOLLAND ix
and spiritual nobles. That internal battle which the Italian
communes had already fought out still lay before the towns of
Germany which were still seeking support from the Empire,
were even eager to become "imperial towns" and hoped by
this means to achieve their independence. King Conrad sorely
needed help. In October 1247 a new rival king had been set
up, again a protege of the great archbishop Sigfrid of Mainz.
Sigfrid's mighty tombstone represents two miserable little
dwarfs of kings, one on each side, while in the centre the
haughty prince of the Church almost unheedingly places with
his finger tips a tiny crownlet on the head of each. This
corresponds exactly to reality. The new King of the Romans
was Count William of Holland — the first mere count, who was
not even one of the princes of the Empire, to bear rule in
Germany. William lacked neither courage nor chivalrous
qualities, but his power never extended beyond the Rhine
country, the sphere of the great archbishops. Still, he con
trived from there to keep King Conrad amply occupied. The
world in general, however, had no use for a nineteen-year-old
Count William of Holland as substitute for the mighty figure
of Frederick II !
The danger of the conspiracy being overcome, Frederick's
position south of the Alps was almost stronger than before,
and his reputation of invulnerability against human assassins
was finally established. The confusion of a few weeks died
down in Sicily, and the skill with which Frederick had countered
the papal machinations had not failed to impress Italy, where
the episode was considered a triumph for the Emperor. Even the
Musulmans showed the warmest interest in the latest events
in Tuscany and Campania. In Northern Italy the Emperor's
power was growing. The Venetians had long since begun to
lean towards him. They had little to hope from a Genoese
pope. Several important nobles in Western Lombardy and in
Piedmont allied themselves to Frederick, and he now controlled
a large unbroken block of territory stretching almost as far as
Lyons. The importance of these regions to Frederick was very
great, and so he hastened to attach the nobles more firmly to
PARTITION OF ITALY 639
his person and his cause by establishing family relations with
them. He married one of his natural daughters to the Genoese
Margrave of Caretto, and Manfred, the son of his well-beloved
Bianca Lancia, he married to the daughter of Count Amadeus
of Savoy, thus establishing relationship with Thomas of Savoy,
to whom he afterwards entrusted a Vicariate General.
Circumstances were also favourable in central Italy. Tus
cany was firmly held, and Frederick of Antioch ruled like a
Signore in Florence after displacing the captains of the popular
party. Finally, Viterbo voluntarily submitted. The people of
Viterbo had always liked Frederick's rule ; they now timidly
sought Frederick of Antioch Js mediation. In response to his
son's request the Emperor again accorded his favour to this
once-hated town, opining that its treachery had been the work
of Cardinal Rainer. To forestall any recurrence of earlier
events he sent his nine-year-old son, whom Isabella of England
had borne him, to reside in Viterbo, as " King " they said.
This precaution is noteworthy because it formed part of a
general reorganisation of the whole Italian administration,
which was the immediate consequence of the great conspiracy
to which it finally put an end. The principle became estab
lished that the Vicars General should be, as far as possible,
relations of the Emperor. The constitution henceforth de
pended on primary personal relationships, and it was abnormal
for any post of eminence to be held by anyone outside the
imperial house. Hubert Pallavicini was one of the rare ex
ceptions. During the years following, Italy became simply a
family possession of the Hohenstaufens. Imperial Italy was
thereafter partitioned more or less as follows : the north-east
is held by Eccelino, central Lombardy by King Enzio, followed
later by Pallavicini, who at first administered the coastal pro
vince of Liguria ; west Lombardy by Thomas of Savoy, whose
unmanageably large domain was later divided between the
Margraves Lancia and Caretto ; Tuscany by Frederick of
Antioch ; Spoleto, the Romagna and the March (a region which
later shrank considerably in size) by Richard of Theate, a
natural son of the Emperor, and Viterbo by the nine-year-old
Henry.
A thoroughly experienced administrator was essential for
640 HOHENSTAUFEN KINGS ix
Sicily, and Walter of Manupello was appointed. No official
was now so tried that Frederick would trust him with complete
independence, so the new Vicar was given as " Counsellors "
the two juvenile sons-in-law, Thomas of Aquino, the younger,
and Count Richard of Caserta, to whom Frederick wrote on
one occasion that " as a blood relation of the Emperor you must
be wholly faithful/' Thomas of Aquino was later employed
as Vicar of the Romagna and Spoleto. Now that the Vicars
General were for the most part members of the imperial house
their independence was robbed of its danger. This system
held good till the Emperor's death.
Other alterations were effected at the same time : Richard
of Montenero was appointed Lord Chief Justice and Piero della
Vigna Logothetes of the Kingdom of Sicily. The Emperor
seems to have been working out another unified scheme ; to
equip each of his sons with his own court and ceremonial,
assign to each an endowment and to make each a real " King "
over a certain Vicariate General. A fragment is extant of the
Emperor's will dating from 1247, drawn up apparently under
the impression of the conspiracy or in anticipation of a campaign
towards the north. Its contents are confirmed by certain
entries of the chroniclers in the same year : Frederick of
Antioch with the County of Alba was to be King of Tuscany ;
King Enzio of Lunigiana ; King Henry of Sicily and the Pro
vince of Viterbo ; the Emperor's grandson Frederick, son of
the unfortunate German King, Henry VII, was to be king of
Austria and Syria. Finally, in the same year, Manfred was to
be invested with the Vicariate General of Burgundy and West
Lombardy. This scheme was never actually put into execu
tion, but it shows how Frederick was endeavouring to strengthen
his Italian Empire which he felt rocking under his feet. It
also shows how by this distribution of his inheritance he was
gradually loosening himself from earthly ties which were exer
cising less and less force on the Antichrist and Scourge of God.
He announced at this period to his friends that he had handed
over the fatigues of Italy to his sons. He was, however, plan
ning another stroke.
I247 VISIT TO GERMANY 641
In the spring of 1247, after a stay of several months in Sicily,
the position south of the Alps seemed so favourable that
Frederick felt he might safely leave Italy and march to Germany
once more, where the pretender Henry Raspe was creating
unrest. He had long since promised King Conrad, who was
a lad of only twenty and who had been carrying on the fight on
hopeless outpost duty, remote from his father and his brothers,
that he would ere long be with him, and the preparations for
his German campaign occupied the winter of 1246-7. This
time he did not intend to rely solely on exotic pomp and im
perial riches which had been so effective when he crossed the
Alps alone with the boy Conrad twelve years before. A great
army was to accompany him as well as his Court, and it was
remarked that the Emperor summoned the knights of the
Italian towns to join the campaign. The suggestion was sup
posed to be Piero della Vigna's. This was an unheard of thing !
Many a time had the Emperors led German warriors to Italy,
but since the days of the Caesars no Italians had been enlisted
for trans-Alpine service in Germany. It appears that the
Italian knights acquiesced without a murmur.
In March 1247 the Emperor quitted his hereditary kingdom.
He travelled by the usual route northwards through Tuscany,
met Frederick of Antioch in Siena, marched by way of San
Miniato to Pisa, without approaching Florence. Frederick
always avoided this town, they say, because the astrologers had
foretold that he was destined to die " sub flore," and the oracle
had been interpreted as relating to Florence. From Tuscany
he continued his march to Lombardy. Only one of the Apen-
nine passes was open to him : the Cisa Pass, which was covered
in the south by Pontremoli and in the north by Parma. The
other route, down the Reno valley by way of Pistoia, was com
manded by the hostile town of Bologna. Frederick reached
Parma in April, intending to push straight on to Cremona.
His original plan was to hold a one-day Diet in Cremona and
to proceed straight by Verona and the Brenner into Germany.
Before quitting Tuscany, however, the Emperor had heard of
the death of Henry Raspe, and this news, which the court
received with rejoicing, probably modified his plans. He now
decided to march through the Arelate instead of by the Brenner
642 THREAT TO LYONS ix
and from Burgundy to make his appearance on the Upper
Rhine, taking this opportunity not only of visiting his kingdom
of Burgundy but also of paying a call on Pope Innocent IV in
Lyons. Counting on the mediation of King Louis of France
he hoped either to induce the Pope to conclude a friendly peace
or by a siege to wring peace from him, as he had once tried to
wring it from Gregory in Rome.
It was a daring undertaking which held great prospect of
success. The plan of appearing on the Upper Rhine shows
foresight. He could count on many supporters there and
could immediately march on to the lower Rhine which was
the focus of the German revolt. His personal appearance in
Burgundy would have greatly strengthened its attachment to
his service ; he had already made more impression on this
western frontier kingdom than any preceding German Emperor
had done, and he was now apparently intending to establish
Manfred there as a Burgundian king. The undertaking against
Lyons was not less promising. The recent alliances with the
Count of Savoy and his neighbouring magnates had extended
his power up to the very gates of Lyons, so that Innocent IV
would indeed be in serious straits if Frederick II really appeared
in Burgundy. The King of France and his brothers would,
of course, have shielded him from actual armed attack, but
Lyons belonged not to France but to the Empire, and King
Louis had not given permission for the Pope to cross into
French territory.
In this spring of 1247 Pope Innocent IV was in considerable
distress. He was a partial prisoner. The fate of his pre
decessor besieged in Rome, the very fate he had sought to flee
from, seemed about to overtake him. Preparations for the
Emperor's reception were proceeding apace. The Count of
Savoy and the Dauphin had already prepared the pass south of
the Mont Cenis ; the Gallic nobles were invited to a Diet in
Chambery for the second week after Whitsun, and the trans-
Alpine populace was eagerly awaiting the arrival of the
" Caesarea Fortuna." After a brief meeting with Eccelino in
Cremona, Frederick had turned his face westwards in the
middle of May, had marched through Pavia with great pomp
and reached Turin in early June. While the imperial house-
1247 GUELFS TAKE PARMA 643
hold and the whole attendant train marched on into the moun
tains Frederick remained behind for a few days in Turin at
the foot of the Alps to meet the Count of Savoy. Just as he
was about to set out to overtake his vanguard a cry for help
reached him from Enzio. Parma had been surprised and taken
by the Guelfs.
Orlando di Rossi had again taken a hand in the game. Some
seventy Guelf knights of Parma, who had fled to Piacenza with
Orlando two years before, had seized their opportunity to
appear suddenly one Sunday before the gates of their native
town. They knew the Emperor was in Turin ; Enzio was
besieging a fortress in the Brescia region ; the Ghibelline
knights of Parma has just assembled for a big wedding and were
" full of wine and of good cheer." Nevertheless they leapt to
horse on hearing of the Guelfs' approach. Led by the imperial
podesta, Arrigo Testa of Arezzo, the knightly poet and the
Emperor's friend, they flung themselves on the foe before he
reached the town. The imperialists were worsted in the first
bloody encounter. Arrigo Testa fell " fighting like a king,"
and with him many another, so that the Guelfs unhindered
entered the open city. Frederick had always feared the in
ternal treachery of Parma, and with a refinement of shrewdness
he had had the fortifications destroyed. The German garrison,
though fairly strong, was therefore unable to make a stand, and
the victors met with no other resistance, for the townsfolk
remained indifferent. No sooner had the surprise been suc
cessful than Parma by arrangement received help from all sides.
The other Guelf towns sent help ; the Guelf partisans who had
been banished from the imperial towns hastened to Parma ;
Milan sent a strong body of auxiliaries under the leadership of
the papal legate Gregory of Montelongo. With them came
Orlando di Rossi. All the Emperor's enemies who had long
been chafing in inactivity had now one rallying point ; in the
shortest possible space of time the struggle for Parma had
become the affair of all the Guelfdom of Italy.
Frederick recognised the danger involved. The journey to
Lyons and the German campaign were abandoned and the
644 GUELF RISINGS ix
return march hastily begun. The Emperor's prestige de
manded the most severe punishment of the treacherous town,
which was of the highest strategic importance because it
commanded the only route of communication with the south.
The command of Italy outweighed every other consideration.
" Only one anxiety occupies our mind : to restore Italy's
severely-shattered government.'* Within two weeks of the
catastrophe the Emperor reached Cremona, where he was met
by Eccelino with six hundred knights. Two days later he
camped before Parma, where King Enzio was awaiting him.
He had abandoned his luckless expedition against Brescia,
hastened to Cremona, and marched on Parma with all men
capable of bearing arms. Enzio had not ventured to attack
with such meagre forces, though according to the chroniclers'
account the town might even then have been re-won for the
Emperor. He had fortified his camp in front of Parma and
was awaiting his father's arrival. It is not now possible to
divine why Frederick did not immediately storm the town,
which had scarcely had time to throw up serious defences.
He seems to have overestimated the strength of his opponents,
and waited to bring up reinforcements from every side. Hugo
Boterius of Parma was one of the first to arrive ; he brought
the levies of Pavia. He was a nephew of the Pope and of
Orlando di Rossi, but in spite of his two uncles he remained
faithful to the Emperor to the last. Frederick of Antioch was
soon on the spot with the troops of Tuscany. The Emperor
had himself had a large army going to Turin, mainly composed
of Sicilians, Saracens, Italian and German mercenary knights.
Eccelino had brought Burgundian knights. Altogether Frede
rick must now have had a very considerable force at his dis
posal. Having missed the initial opportunity of storming the
town without waiting to besiege it he could not keep this large
army together before Parma.
The defection of Parma was the signal for an almost universal
revolt of the Guelfs of Italy. In every province the Emperor's
authority was suddenly endangered. There was not a single
Vicariate General where the Guelfs did not rise against the
BLOCKADE OF PARMA 645
Emperor, usually supported by papal troops, and even Sicily
seemed threatened by the Genoese, Within a few weeks the
whole of Italy was ablaze, and innumerable minor theatres of
war sapped the strength of the main army. Every great power
in its death-throes is exposed to the same danger. Never
before had Frederick's case been so desperate. It was no small
achievement that he did succeed in repressing the insurrection
in spite of the infinite dispersion of his forces.
A hard and fast siege of Parma was from the first impossible.
The Emperor must be in a position to release troops as required
for minor campaigns. He, therefore, set about cutting off all
lines of communication with the town in a wide arc, while his
strong Cavalry detachments swept the country round Parma.
The Emperor himself closed the road to the Guelf town of
Piacenza by camping west of Parma on the Taro. The im
perial towns of Reggio and Modena blocked the eastern road to
Bologna. The road to the north, and with it the communica
tion with the Po, had to remain open for the moment, for nothing
competed in importance with the southern route over the Cisa
Pass. This pass over the Apennines was as good as lost. The
northern exit had been at once secured by Margrave Lancia,
but confusion reigned on the further side. Garfagnana and
Lunigiana had fallen at the same time as Parma, the Imperial
Vicar had been taken prisoner and the Malaspina Margraves
had revolted, hoping thus to recover their territories which the
Emperor had confiscated. Communication with Tuscany was,
therefore, actually cut. King Enzio had just returned with
Eccelino and Hubert Pallavicini from a raid — he had been sent
to strengthen Modena and Reggio against Bologna. He was
now entrusted with the task of opening up the Cisa Pass. With
the assistance of Pallavicini, and supported by the loyal Pon-
tremoli, he succeeded in taking the fortress of Berceto and
pushing on far beyond Pontremoli. One of the Malaspina
Margraves submitted. This most important route was thus at
the Emperor's disposal once more.
Frederick was now free to complete the encirclement of
Parma on the north. As long as the besieged town had free
access to the Po the garrison was able to secure provisions sent
from Mantua and Ferrara by boat. Enzio and Eccelino, who
646 CHECK ix
now usually worked in concert, were ordered to make a bridge
head on the Po west of Guastalla, both to put an end to river
traffic and to close the roads leading from the river to Parma.
They took Brescello, a fort upstream from Guastalla, and threw
a bridge across the river which they strongly fortified. This
drew the Mantuans and Ferrarese into the quarrel. They tried
to relieve Parma, and Enzio and Eccelino had to keep this new
enemy at bay. This they did without difficulty, but presently
a strong army from every possible Guelf town, accompanied by
a great fleet, was known to be approaching. Eccelino 's brother,
Alberigo of Romano, was in the Guelf camp. But they did not
venture to attack the imperial forces, and for two months the
hostile army lay at Guastalla. Enzio and Eccelino felt no need
to attack. They were holding a whole army in check and ful
filling their task of closing Parma's last line of communication.
We have no clue to the inactivity of the papal- Guelf army.
The rumour inevitably spread through the besieged town that
the papal general, young and charming Cardinal Ottaviano
degli Ubaldini, was secretly in league with the Emperor. This
was certainly untrue, for this particular scion of the powerful
Tuscan family which played so important a role in Florentine
history, never was in league with anyone. He made this a
matter of principle. This highly-gifted, "most unpriestly
priest," had been made acting-bishop of Bologna at twenty-
six, was fully consecrated when he reached the prescribed age
of thirty, and at once created a Cardinal Deacon by Pope
Innocent. He was neither Guelf nor Ghibelline but just him
self : THE CARDINAL ! Every child in Tuscany knew him under
this title, and Dante introduces him into the Divine Comedy
under this name. The poet saw him side by side with Frede
rick II in the fiery tombs of the Epicureans " who with the
body make the spirit die." Dante made them neighbours no
doubt also because the Cardinal, like Eccelino and many another,
was under the intellectual spell of the great Hohenstaufen whom
he took as his model in many ways.
Once when he lost a sum of money through the Ghibellines-
the blasphemous Ottaviano remarked with a sigh, " If there
happens to be a soul I have lost mine to the Ghibellines."
Ubaldini did not make ruthless power an end in itself— he was
THE CARDINAL 647
a complete failure as a general— but he pushed to its ultimate
limit another method of the Emperor's : the game of political
diplomacy. He did not pursue imperial politics, nor church
politics, nor Ubaldini family politics, nor cardinals* politics,
but just " politics"; sometimes pro- and sometimes anti-
Guelf; sometimes with, sometimes against, Florence; there
was no Ghibelline party, no political group with which he did
not maintain continuous relations, no intrigue in which his
ringed hand did not play its part always holding the last card
in reserve. Far above Empire or Papacy he rated his own
attractive, capricious personality which everyone in Italy cor
dially distrusted. This lighthearted artist, epicure and prince
of the Church sought every stimulus that the times offered.
He was one of the first Tuscan vernacular poets, closely related
to Hohenstaufen circles, not only in matters of belief. When
the handsome Cardinal Ottaviano apostrophised " my master,
Cupid," in a very perfect sonnet he sang of what he knew.
His mistresses and his posterity were well known. The luxury
indulged in by the amorous poet, who was also an enthusiastic
huntsman, in his magnificent country seat in the Mugello,
rivalled the Emperor's. He had had his silver table-service
wrought in Paris ; he sent for ornaments and costly stuffs from
Spain and Tripoli and Greece ; his buckles and brooches were
set with cameos and pearls and precious stones ; his apartments
were lighted by candles in candelabra of mountain crystal ; as
well as the rarest and most select works of art, such as the first
goblet worked in niello, his treasure included a magnificent
crown set with sapphires, rubies and carbuncles. The pomp
of Ubaldini exercised nearly as great a fascination over the
young aristocrats as the Emperor's court had been wont to do,
and the Cardinal was well skilled in finding high positions for
his young chaplains. These protege's of his were infected as
a matter of course with his amazing religious indifference, still
remarkable amongst the spiritual princes of the day, and with
the Epicurean doctrines of Averroes which Ottaviano expiated
in his tomb of flame. He raised his chamberlain, Otto Visconti,
to the see of St. Ambrose, making him archbishop of Milan
when this town turned Ghibelline. Otto Visconti, to whom
the Galeazzo and Bernabo owed their power, was such a perfect
PARMA IN STRAITS ix
heretic that his chiselled tomb of red marble turned black of
itself, and when his nephew Matthew Visconti had it painted
red again turned black once more, so the story ran. Cardinal
Ottaviano was, in short, the first of a type of cardinal which
perished with Ippolito Medici.
While the Cardinal remained quietly in his camp at Guastalla
his reluctance to attack produced ere long unpleasant conse
quences in Parma. The blockade which Enzio and Eccelino
had succeeded in establishing began to make itself gradu
ally felt. Parma was cut off from all external assistance, and
nothing was to be got from the immediate neighbourhood, for
cavalry and raiding parties of the Emperor's scoured the country
without ceasing, and devastated and laid waste everything which
they did not themselves require. Famine became so acute that
they were baking bread of linseed, and were suffering severely
from lack of salt. The townsfolk began to lose heart when the
Cardinal's promised reliefs on which they had been counting
were still delayed. The courageous and resourceful defender
of Parma, the papal legate Gregory of.Montelongo, who knew
the Lombards better than most men, was driven to every
conceivable stratagem to persuade the inhabitants to hold out.
The most distinguished knights of Parma were assembled when
a mendicant monk suddenly appeared in their midst, travel-
stained and in the last stages of exhaustion, and took from his
knapsack a letter with the joyful news that help was at hand.
The letter had been written overnight by Montelongo. In
spite of all promises the general opinion was that Cardinal
Ottaviano was betraying the papal cause, and Fra Salimbene,
who at this point escaped from Parma, even carried the rumour
to Lyons, where the upshot of the siege was awaited with in
tense anxiety : "for as in a duel the whole fate of Rome and
of the clergy hung thereon." The story ran that the red-
legged cardinals who swarmed in Lyons had pressed round Fra
Salimbene in such numbers that one climbed the shoulders of
another in their eagerness to hear the latest news of Parma.
In spite of the greatest exertions on both sides a speedy
decision was not forthcoming. During the winter of 1247-48
OSIMO 649
the Emperor was fighting everywhere in Italy. December
brought especially heavy battles in the provinces. Margrave
Boniface of Montferrat, who had recently submitted to the
Emperor, had turned his coat once more, and with the support
of Vercelli and Milan had seized Turin, where only the garrison
of the Emperor's palace still held out. The Emperor des
patched thither his grandson Frederick, a youth of twenty or
so, who succeeded in driving the Margrave out and rescuing
Turin for the Emperor. At about the same time Count
Richard of Theate defeated a papal army under Hugo Novellus
at Interamna, and Robert of Castiglione, imperial Vicar of the
March, inflicted an overwhelming defeat on the papal legate,
bishop Marcellina at Osimo, south of Ancona, chiefly by the
assistance of German mercenary knights. The bishop was
taken prisoner, four thousand papalists were reported slain,
numerous standards and banners were captured, amongst them
one which Manuel Comnenus had presented to the people of
Ancona when they betrayed Barbarossa. Hubert Pallavicini
with Jacob of Caretto, the Emperor's son-in-law, was preparing
an attack on Genoa in which the fleet took part.
Conditions in Florence, and indeed in Tuscany in general,
were nevertheless very critical for the Emperor. Even without
going himself to Florence Cardinal Ottaviano had an easy task
to urge the Guelfs, especially the nobility, into open rebellion.
They had been everywhere excluded from office and jealously
watched. The common people, artisans and merchants, were
by no means exclusively anti-Kaiser. Thanks to skilful Ghibel-
line policy the famous imperialist party, well known as the
primo popolo, had been formed, which included both the pro-
Kaiser nobility and the people's party. Their case was not
unique. The popular movement in Siena had years before
been given an imperialist bias and a Ghibelline had put himself
at the head of the people. In Florence both parties now pro
ceeded to woo the crowd, and although Orlando di Rossi may
have worked against the Emperor while still keeping the mask
of loyalty during his term of office as podesta, there were prob
ably not many of the popular party on the occasion of this rising
fighting under the lily-banner of the Guelfs against the Hohen-
staufen eagles.
650 CHAOS ix
Frederick of Antioch had hitherto treated the Florentine
Guelfs with tolerance and had permitted their remaining in
the town. This lightened their task of capturing the reins of
government in the town with the help of the Bolognese and
causing Florence to desert the Emperor. The most terrible
street fighting took place, in which the rage of the Guelfs was
chiefly directed against the imperialist family of the Uberti.
They, however, were able in their powerful towers to defy all
attack and even to take the offensive. The head of the Uberti
was the great leader Farinata, who, in Dante's hell, is a neigh
bour of Frederick II and of the Cardinal. After the victory of
Montaperti his Ghibelline friends wanted to wipe Florence off
the face of the earth, but Farinata intervened and won thereby
the eternal fame of having saved Florence. His gigantic shade
recognising a fellow Florentine in Dante's speech revealed the
future to the poet :
His breast and forehead there
Erecting, seemed as in high scorn he held
E'en Hell.
Farinata had been preparing the ground for an attack on the
Guelfs when Frederick of Antioch, having assembled his forces
in Prato, arrived and penetrated into Florence. He soon had
the town in his power, and while the Guelfs fled to various
minor rallying points in Tuscany the crash might be heard of
the Guelf towers which Frederick of Antioch was pulling down.
The lofty tower of the Adimari, some 230 feet high, crashed
down on the Piazza, missing the Baptistery by the thickness of
a hair.
The tale of Florence was repeated everywhere, and even
when the imperial officials contrived to drive the rebels from
the towns, the " fugitives," as they were called now, formed a
definite class in the population (one to which Dante was later
to belong) which was nearly as dangerous without the walls as
within. For they leagued themselves with the fugitives from
other towns and constituted a standing menace to every im
perialist city, as, conversely, fugitive Ghibellines from the Guelf
towns fought in the Emperor's army and threatened their native
places. The defection of Parma was the signal in Italy for a
REX TYRANNUS 651
fight of all against all, which was to rage for decades with un-
diminished fury. The chronicler complains that none could
plough nor sow nor reap nor gather in the vintage, nor live in
the country villas, for all was too unsafe. Only quite close to
a town under the protection of armed men a little agriculture
could be carried on. On the high road one traveller shrank
from another as from the devil incarnate, for each suspected
the other of wanting to hold him to ransom. Merchants could
only move about in large caravans, and even then the Floren
tines who were reckoned to be imperialists were by no means
safe from, for instance, the papalist folk of Piacenza, who on
occasion looted an entire Tuscan caravan. The Middle Ages
looked on this general unrest only as a sign that the reign of
Antichrist, of the rex tyrannus, had come, and that, as the
chronicler adds, " all hath fulfilled itself in its time from the
moment that Parma fell away from the side of the Emperor to
the side of the Church."
Day by day Frederick was indeed growing more and more of
a rex tyrannus. While he was encamped before Parma he saw
his whole Italian state aflame in raging revolt and the Church
lashing men on to treachery. How could he master these
intangible spirits ! Thanks to the valour of his sons and his
vicars he was at first victorious in the provinces, but it
became more and more difficult to get to grips with the foe.
Men of Florence, Parma, Ferrara, Mantua, and other places
were fighting : some in the imperial army and some for the
Guelfs ; and Frederick was now pitted not against the hostile
feeling of whole communes, but against individual and isolated
persons, whose adherence to this party or that was dictated by
the petty accidents and advantages of the moment. The im
pulses that actuated them were confused, incalculable, making
a mockery of any comprehensive policy. Thousands of single
foes and single traitors constituted no commensurable enemy
for an Emperor. All the while, as the great conspiracy had
proved, Frederick's life was not safe. Surrounded by his body
guard of Saracens he came more and more, though against his
will, to resemble the " Tyrant " who, with treachery spreading
652 SARACEN EXECUTIONERS ix
round him like a plague, the defection of yesterday's friends
for ever imminent, grew hourly more suspicious, more severe,
even malicious, in his punishments, and often by fear terrified
men into disloyalty and rebellion.
Frederick now began to have recourse to all the cruel re
finements of oppression which are forced on a government
threatened by betrayal. The principle of taking hostages had
long been in force, but the system was now carefully extended.
It was not possible to transport all hostages &t once to Apulia, so
those of one town were handed over for safe custody to another.
The hostages of Como, for instance, were lodged with Siena,
those of Spoleto with Poggibonsi and San Gimignano, so that
each town went bail for the other and the towns were linked
together by a network of hostages. Further, so far as Guelfs
did not of their own accord fly from the Ghibelline towns,
suspects were banished in masses and every imperialist town
was forbidden to accord them refuge. The evils of denuncia
tion followed, for anyone could thus get rid of a rival or
opponent. The imperial officials, breathing the air of treachery,
dare not neglect any accusation. They had to take up any sus
picious case brought to their notice, and in order, if necessary,
to extort confession, torture came into play. The Sicilian
Book of Laws forbade the use of torture save in a few
restricted cases, but all safeguards were now thrown to the
winds in Italy, and nothing short of a miracle (the repeated
breaking of a rope for instance) could set a victim again at
liberty. The application of torture had a further consequence.
It was natural to employ " the cyclops of Avernus, the slaves
of Vulcan/' that is to say, the Emperor's Saracens, as execu
tioners, and the vicar's courts were usually provided with a
Saracen hangman, whom saint or priest could not intimidate.
The case of bishop Marcellina of Arezzo, who was taken
prisoner in the battle of Osimo, will show how these " myrmi
dons of Satan " discharged their office. The Emperor had
issued general orders that no more prisoners should be spared
and held to ransom, they should be without exception hanged.
The fact that Marcellina of Arezzo was a priest and a legate
BISHOP MARCELLINA 653
of the Pope's was certainly not an extenuating circumstance in
the Emperor's eyes. On the contrary, he had often inveighed
against weapon-bearing priests, and Marcellina was, moreover, a
vassal who had broken his oath of fealty. Yet his case was
looked into and he was imprisoned for several months before
being handed over to the hangman. His execution aroused
great indignation. Cardinal Rainer of Viterbo gave vent to his
hate shortly before his own death in a horror-inspiring pamph
let recording in letters of fire the martyrdom of Marcellina and
the abominations of Frederick II. The Saracen devils had
first bound the saint's hands and feet and tied the bishop to a
horse's tail to drag him through the mire to the place of
execution. But the bishop sang the Te Deum and the pious
horse stood still, and even blows would not induce him to
move till the Saracens had silenced further singing. After
various torments the bishop was hanged. Three days later
some mendicant monks buried him. The Saracens exhumed
the corpse, defiled it, and hung it on the gallows again. This
continued till the Emperor put an end to it.
The episode gave a handle to hostile agitation. In Wurz-
burg a crusading sermon against Frederick was preached. In
England the opinion was that this deed of shame would have
been more scandalous if the papalists had not sullied their cause
with deeds more heinous. The Emperor will not have been
greatly stirred by the news that Marcellina 's bones performed
miracles. Saints who were still alive were always, with good
reason, highly suspect : Peter " the Martyr," who later became
the patron saint of the Spanish Inquisition, stirred up a revolt
in Florence, and St. Rosa carried on her activities in Viterbo
till the Emperor banished her and her following. Frederick
now issued instructions against the monks and priests of Italy
similar to those he had formerly levelled at the clergy of Sicily.
No cleric was to presume to change his dwelling without the
written permission of the podesta. Every bishop who obeyed
the Pope's command and ceased to hold divine service and
administer the sacraments was banished and his ^ goods con
fiscated. A ten-days' respite was granted them in which to
resume the services. This put the priests into an awkward
position. The Pope's advice : patiently to endure martyrdom
6S4 VICTORIA ix
was probably not always taken. The mendicant monks, whom
Innocent sternly segregated from all other orders, developed a
Jesuitical theory that it was lawful for them to hold services and
avail themselves of imperial passports in order to get about
their business. Frederick, therefore, tightened up the regula
tions against the mendicant orders : any receiver or conveyer
of a papal letter, anyone even knowing of such a letter, was
forthwith condemned to a fiery death. One suspect pro
curator of the Sicilian Minorites was arrested, and eighteen
separate tortures were appointed for him. The chroniclers
were never tired of recording the cruelties and outrages com
mitted by this " Pharaoh drunk with the blood of the saints "
who had persecuted the clergy above all others. Frederick
showed in reality little of a bloodthirsty tyrant, though he would
execute a number of Parma prisoners every morning in front
of the city to intimidate the besieged. His reign of terror was
inspired not by madness but by direst need.
Meanwhile matters were progressing favourably round
Parma. As winter drew on, Frederick II repeated his Faenza
procedure on a much larger scale and built a fortified camp-
town, bringing wood and tiles from all the neighbourhood
round. The Emperor was determined that when Parma fell
it should be wiped out and in its stead this new town should
.remain. He laid it out according to a well-thought-out plan,
and in anticipation called it " Victoria," a name not unworthy
to rank with his other foundations : Caesarea, Augusta, Aquila.
He copied the methods of classical town-planners : the new
town was to arise under the sign of Mars : astrologers and
augurs had to calculate an auspicious moment while the site
of the new town was marked out with the plough. It was to
have eight gates, with walls, moats and drawbridges ; nothing
was lacking : a canal brought water to it, and mills were built
on the new river. And in Victoria one of the very few places
of worship was erected of which Frederick was the founder.
This temple was dedicated to St. Victor. The coins of the new
town bore on the one side the Emperor's head, and on the other
the town with the legend " Victoria " ; they were known as
DISTRESS IN PARMA 655
Victorines. This new foundation was to resemble a town of
long standing, with streets and houses, market-place and palace,
shops, and everything which a town could require, while out
side it the Emperor laid out villas with gardens and vineyards
and orchards for his Saracen maidens and their host of eunuchs.
Frederick had installed himself with his entire court, his
chancery and treasury, his courts of law and household, his
menagerie and his huntsmen, so as to await in peace and
comfort the starvation of Parma. The world looked on in
amazement. Not a chronicler but records at least the building
of Victoria, One who was learned in astrological lore remarks
that the Emperor had failed to note in founding his town that
Cancer was very close to Mars ; the town was doomed.
Here in Victoria the Emperor felt himself safe for the winter.
He had, as usual, at the beginning of the cold weather, dis
missed a part of the town levies or sent them off to other theatres
of war where the fighting this December was very brisk. In
the Spring the town ought to be nearly starved out and could
be stormed. The privation in Parma was increasing. Just
once the Mantuans and Ferrarese had succeeded in getting a
supply of corn into the famine-stricken town. During a short
absence of Enzio and Eccelino these allies of Parma had de
stroyed the fortified bridge at Brescello, and when Enzio in
revenge besieged Colorno, which lay on Parma's own little river,
they opened the sluices and flooded the country so that Enzio
had to withdraw. The king of Sardinia soon equalised the
account. He threw a new bridge over the Po at Bugno between
Colorno and Brescello, and from this position he was able to
repel all attacks. Parma was thus once more completely shut
in and its surrender imminent. Frederick could feel his success
assured, and when messengers came out to him to beg his
mercy in case Parma should surrender, he sent them back, so
the story runs, " with the acid advice ironically imparted in
confidence that they had better be economical with their corn,
because as long as he lived Parma should get nothing more
to eat/'
But, as a chronicler puts it, " confidence is the mother of
misfortune/' and the imperial camp let itself be lulled into
culpable carelessness. The Emperor was normally distrustful
656 DISASTER ix
enough ; for once he was too trustful. Certainly Parma had
spies in his army and were exactly informed of his movements.
Thus they knew that on the eighteenth of February, 1248,
Victoria's garrison was weakened by many small diversions ;
that Enzio was away ; that the Emperor according to custom
had ridden forth at dawn with his falcons and his hawks and
his buzzards, accompanied by his sixteen-year-old son Manfred
and some fifty knights : the marshes round Parma lent them
selves to the chase of waterfowl. Only Margrave Lancia was
left behind in command. The Parma garrison made a sortie
as they often did, this time towards the south in the direction
of the Apennines. The Margrave with a portion of his army
set off in pursuit. The sortie had only been a ruse. No
sooner was Lancia gone than the population of Parma, followed
by their wives and children, flung themselves suddenly on the
almost unguarded camp, rushed over the drawbridges into
Victoria, set the town on fire and mowed down the unprepared
troops in masses. The Emperor, listening to his falcons' silver
bells, heard suddenly the great alarm bell of Victoria. He
galloped back at full speed with his following and found the
Margrave heavily engaged. The Emperor came to his assis
tance, forced his way into Victoria and tried to save what still
remained. But he was soon in difficulties himself with his few
huntsmen : he could only just cut his way out, and when he
saw that all was lost he escaped with barely fourteen horsemen
to Borgo San Donnino.
It was the severest defeat of his life. Fifteen hundred of his
men were slain, and twice that number taken prisoners —
Thaddeus of Suessa, his friend and Lord Chief Justice, was
dead, and with him others of the very best : one Aquino and
one Hohenburg among them, it would seem. The whole
treasury was gone : gold, silver, pearls, gems, solitaires, purple
cloths, ceremonial robes ; gone was the sceptre, the Royal Seal
of Sicily, the heavy giant crown with its many figures like a
piece of masonry, which was intended on solemn occasions to
be suspended over the head of the world-ruler. A little man
from Parma, who was nicknamed " Corto passo " from his
tripping gait, had secured this as his booty and brought it in
triumph back to Parma. Much other booty from the light-
1248 FORTUNA AUGUSTI 657
hearted camp-town : the menagerie, the eunuchs, the harem,
must have excited interest ; other things awakened horror
and curiosity : there was, for instance, a statue supposed to be
made of Church treasures melted down, which the Emperor
was said to have adored. They found experimentally that this
idol healed neither the maimed nor the blind ; at most it con
temned the scriptures. There were magic drawings, charts of
the heavens and animal circles which " Beelzebub and Ash-
taroth, the Consuls of Darkness, " the astrologers and magicians,
made use of. The most important trophy was the carroccio of
Cremona, which to Cremona's shame was drawn by a team of
donkeys in triumph into Parma — following the example the
Emperor had set.
The impression which this defeat made on the world at large
was annihilating. This was the end of the Emperor's power
people said, and numerous songs of clergy, townsfolk and
wandering minstrels sang the brilliant victory of Parma. It
was Frederick's first serious defeat. Things had gone against
him on previous occasions, but he had never before been con
quered by the towns, and now his most priceless asset was at
stake : the tradition of his invincibility. Frederick diagnosed
the situation exactly. Instead of being crushed under the blow
he drew new strength from defeat through his fanatic belief
in his star, in the Fortuna Augusti. Even defeat must turn
to advantage since Fortune dwelt with him, and this defeat
spurred him to maximum effort, as at other times victory was
wont to do . Under this blow the fifty-year-old warrior showed
the tense vigour of his prime. With the scanty following that
had followed him to Borgo San Donnino he galloped to
Cremona and arrived late that night, having been in the saddle
since dawn, "in no wise out of heart." The terrified popu
lace, men, women and children, poured into the streets and
crowded round the Emperor, thanking God with tears that he
at least was safe . Frederick spoke to them words of good cheer.
Within three days he had assembled a new army, mainly com
posed of men of Pavia and Cremona, and on the fourth he
resumed the oflfensive. Victoria had fallen on the i8th of
658 NEW VICTORIES ix
February ; on the 22nd the Emperor led his forces across to
the Po to attack Parma. The mere sound of his name had still
such potency that the victors who had intended, under Monte-
longo, to invest the bridge at Bugno which Enzio was still
holding, took to their heels in terror at his approach. King
Enzio was consequently able to loot a fleet of some hundred
ships which was bringing provisions from Mantua and Ferrara
to the half-starved town, and to take three hundred prisoners
whom he promptly hanged on either bank.
Frederick could now have restored the previous state of
siege, and this was undoubtedly his first intention, for he wrote
that he was now laying waste the country round Parma with
fire and sword and inspiring courage in his troops by his own
presence, and the town should not evade her fate. A council
of war was held in the ruins of Victoria, but the vote was against
a resumption of the siege. Frederick still camped near in order
to secure the road to Pontremoli and the pass which was again
threatened. Incidentally he was able to take a preliminary
revenge. The Parma forces were pressing on after the Em
peror when they were attacked by Lancia with the loyal knights
of Parma, sixty Guelf knights were captured and over a hundred
slain, amongst them Bernardo Orlando di Rossi, who was hewn
in pieces, " our infamous traitor of long standing, the head and
tail of the entire opposition." The most dangerous result of
the defeat of Victoria was its effect on opinion at a distance.
Parma's defection had breathed hope into the Guelfs, how much
more Parma's victory ! Almost the whole of the Romagna was
lost; Ravenna surrendered to Ottaviano, and her secession
brought in its train the loss of a number of other towns in the
neighbourhood who were her dependents. It is believed
that an imperial vicar had here been in league with Pandulf of
Fasanella and Jacob of Morra, the two fugitive conspirators
who were now fighting in the papalist ranks.
Nevertheless, the Emperor succeeded in restoring the
equilibrium of the tottering state. Richard of Theate seems
to have won another victory over the papalist general, Hugo
Novellus, at Cittanuova in the Ancona March. Novellus was
slain and with him Matthew Fasanella, the traitor's brother.
A conspiracy was detected in Reggio and nipped in the bud by
MONEY SHORTAGE 659
Enzio, who had a hundred conspirators publicly beheaded. A
Milanese army going to Parma's assistance hastily turned back
when the Emperor moved against Milan. At the same time
Feltre and Belluno in the north-east submitted to Eccelino,
and a revulsion in Frederick's favour began to be felt in
Vercelli. Frederick was to appear during the summer in Pied
mont and take possession of Vercelli. He wrote to his loyal
Sicilians that " Fortuna who is ours and who is wont to smile
more graciously when we challenge her favours has turned
once more on us a smiling face, though lately she had seemed
to cold-shoulder us a little." He told his friends in confidence
that he had "thrice thrown a six" at dice, and Fortuna was
promising not only invincibility but certain victory.
The Emperor's confidence was never shaken, though
numerous minor annoyances occurred at this juncture. It was
peculiarly irritating that the entire imperial treasury had been
lost at Parma. He was in such straits for money that he main
tained that he and his court lacked for the moment the barest
necessities, he had scarcely enough to eat, let alone the means
for winning victories. New taxes must be raised. The taxes
now imposed were double or more than double the average :
60,000 ounces had been levied in Sicily in 1242, 130,000 were
raised now. Frederick further commanded all his Italian
vicars to impose a tax extraordinary on all monasteries and
churches. The Emperor was not wont to consider the tax
payer overmuch ; yet when one Sicilian town offered to make
a proportional freewill contribution towards replacing the
state treasury he declined to accept it. He thanked the citizens
warmly for their good will, but in view of existing hardships,
and of the intolerable burden which the town was already
bearing, he would take the will for the deed. On the other hand
he again mortgaged, as he had done once before, the Montieri
silver mines at Volterra. Either he or Frederick of Antioch
borrowed 12,000 Pisan silver pounds (roughly £6000) from
Siena at 80 per cent, interest. The Emperor absolutely had to
have cash, and had to resort to extreme measures. New coins
were struck in Sicily which, with exchange fees, etc., brought
660 KNIGHTS ix
in some 8000 gold ounces (say .£21,000). These expedients
must have mitigated the money shortage, and we learn that
considerable consignments of money reached Frederick with
other assistance from the Greek Emperor, John Vatatzes. It
must have been about this period that a certain amount of
grumbling was heard among the mercenary knights who were
drawn from every corner of the Empire, but more especially
from Italy and Germany.
The German knights, who came in ever-increasing numbers
to serve in Italy, were in these last years almost Frederick's
only link with the North. Since the diet of Verona, which
Frederick had held at the time of the Council of Lyons, the
German nobles had ceased to attend Frederick's camp and
court ; and the feudal knights whom they should have supplied
were also missing. "We do not wish to overtax our princes
either in personal service or material contribution for the con
quest of Italy, though some, thirsty for the glory of the Empire
and greedy of our presence, have voluntarily shared our labours
and been with us all the time . . .", wrote the Emperor once.
Except the brothers Hohenburg no German princes had sought
to share the Emperor's labours ; and conditions in Germany :
the papal oppression which lay heavy on the spiritual princes ;
the rival kings who divided the secular loyalties ; the
civil wars in Germany and the general misery, made absence
from Germany well-nigh impossible even if they had wished
to go to Italy. Frederick could dispense easily enough with
the German princes; but he would sorely have missed his
German knights. Although the town infantries were taking
an increasing share in the fighting, the heavily-armoured knight
still formed the flower of every army. The brilliance and the
power of the higher command depended on the number of
the knights, declared the Emperor, and he naturally valued the
German knights above them all. " We want to have Germans
as knights, for we rely on their war experience. They must
receive their pay and whatever they require without hitch."
Early Hohenstaufens had used mercenary knights as well as
feudal cavalry for their short journeys to Rome and campaigns
in Italy, but Frederick was permanently in Italy. He was the
first, therefore, to establish a permanent corps of German knights
GERMANS IN ITALY 661
as a regular institution. His principle was that Sicily must
provide the money and Germany the men. Frederick's need
met a complementary need in Germany. Love of adventure
and many another motive drove the German knights into
Frederick's arms. In large and ever-increasing numbers the
lower nobility crossed the Alps and joined the imperial armies ;
counts and gentlemen, ministeriales, made the pilgrimage and
hired themselves out, at first to the Emperor only, later to other
Ghlbelline leaders, and, when the Empire had fallen, to the
Guelfs also. Presently counts and dukes also, whose gifts
found no scope in Germany, followed the lead and became
commandants of large mercenary bands. These independent
" Marshals J> foreshadow the later type of great mercenary
leaders, John Hawkwood for example, or Duke Werner
Urslingen (Guarneri) with his " Great Company " of three
thousand German lances, who bore on their silver breastplate
the motto " Enemy of Pity, of Mercy, and of God." Under
Frederick II one such German force, said to have amounted
to eighteen hundred lances, was serving under Count Jordan
as Marshal, Frederick having no doubt appointed Jordan to
the command.
It is possible either to regret that so much German strength
flowed into Italy, or to rejoice that at least some ten thousand
German knights escaped the cheerless constriction of Germany
after the fall of the Empire. Whichever line we take, Frederick
II and the Hohenstaufens must answer for it. Through her
mercenary knights Germany played no negligible part in the
Italian Renaissance, for the appearance of these northern
warriors made a great impression in Italy. The Italians of the
late thirteenth century, and still more of later days, would have
had no conception of a knight if it had not been for the French
and the thousands of young German nobles whom first the
Hohenstaufens attracted to Italy. What an impression King
Manfred's victorious Germans of Montaperti left behind them !
" Powerful figures, expert in the use of weapons, expert on
horseback, they charge like lions let loose, and their war horses
are like moving mountains in the flash of the weapons." They
went into battle on the Arbia singing, with the name of God
and St. George, their patron saint, on their lips. We learn in
662 DONATELLO'S " ST. GEORGE" ix
great detail how these Germans under the black and silver
banner of King Manfred charged against the red lily of Florence :
" Never did Hector perform such slaughter among the Greek
host as Marshal Jordan this day amongst the Florentines."
After the victory the eight hundred German knights, with
wreaths of olive on their helmets, rode behind the trumpets and
the royal banner in triumph into Siena and dismounted before
the cathedral to thank the Virgin for their victory. In later
days the impression made by the Germans was even stronger.
Somewhere about the beginning of the Trecento a body of
fifteen hundred knights rode into Lombardy, "excellently
armed and cast as it were in one piece with their chargers," and
the Italians said " these are the most handsome men that
Lombardy has ever seen and all down to the very last of them
. . . fearless knights of lofty stature, still in the flower of their
youth, but practised in arms and dauntless in courage."
A Roman cardinal of those days still called the Germans
"the handsomest warriors in the world." In all the larger
towns they erected to their " San Giorgio " altars, chapels and
churches. We need not, therefore, be surprised that Donatello
in the opening of the fifteenth century, in creating his St.
George, unwittingly quickened from the marble a noble German
boy.^ In these forms we still catch the echoes of Germany's
heroic age, the Hohenstaufen age that gave birth to the regal
horsemen of Bamberg and Magdeburg, now echoing to its
close in Italy. The tortured, distorted, thought-tormented
Germany of later Gothic had no eye for the noble pride and
aristocratic freedom of such forms. It almost seems as if these
young warriors were driven south so that their beauty might
not perish fruitlessly, unhonoured and unsung. These home
less heroes were doomed to perish whichever way they turned :
" if they mixed too long with the Italians they became inocu
lated with their vices ... but from their homes they come
simple and loyal and true hearted." Their simplicity struck
the over-refined, indescribably corrupt Italy of the Renaissance
much as of old that of the Germanic tribes had affected the
Rome of the Caesars. The Germanic heroic age closed, there
fore, as it had begun : singly at first, then in groups, then in
ever-growing numbers their warriors had gone to Rome to
LOUIS' CRUSADE 663
serve the divine Emperors; they then had conquered Rome,
and then — beginning with Dietrich of Bern and ending with
Frederick II — they had founded their own States, and then
fought on as mercenaries till towards the close of the Renais
sance the stream dried up : to Italy's loss.
Within four months of the defeat of Victoria, Frederick II
to some extent quieted Italy. Indeed, he felt the situation so
secure that he began to toy again with the plan of the preceding
year : to march on Lyons. New possibilities of peace seemed
open. King Louis of France was just about to start on his
Crusade, and that strife at home might not imperil his great
undertaking he wanted to see the Empire and the Papacy at
peace. Saint Louis had never recognised the Emperor's de
position, and for all his piety had throughout maintained a
correspondence with Frederick, although the Pope assured him
that Frederick sought to abolish all worship of God so that he
himself might be worshipped alone throughout the universe :
an idol of the most revolting depravity. Moreover, Louis
wanted the Emperor's co-operation, for Sicily was always the
base for any overseas expeditions. Other important people
also interested themselves in securing peace, but all attempts
failed. The Pope refused to contemplate any peace which
left the Hohenstaufen Empire standing. Disappointed by his
failure the French King set sail from Aiguesmortes on his fatal
Crusade. These negotiations and the plan of a possible move
to Lyons had led the Emperor to enter Piedmont in July 1248,
where the accession of Vercelli gave affairs a favourable turn.
Pope Innocent IV saw the Emperor again drawing near the
Alps and had himself well guarded in Lyons. A papal attempt
to divert some Crusaders for an attack on Sicily instead of on
the Holy Land fell through. Frederick held a diet in Vercelli
and remained many months in Western Lombardy. Towards
the end of 1248 he returned to Cremona by way of Pavia. Here
he was to meet the bitterest disillusionment of his life.
Frederick had allowed his followers to worship him as the
Son of God ; his loyal adherents captured in Parma implored
him to set them free with " his sacred hands," for they were
664 ET TU . . . ix
suffering for him " as the martyrs for Christ's sake." He had
shared the honour and the glory of the Son of God. There was
a pitiless logic in the fact that at the end of his life he had to
a certain degree to share Christ's fate. It was probably from
Cremona that he wrote to the King of France that he felt it
particularly embittering that the Pope should send Crusaders
against Sicily, " as if the mystery of the life-giving cross had
been wafted from the Holy Land to Sicily, as if Christ were
crucified again in Apulia." This mournful comparison is
uncannily close to facts : Judas Iscariot's role had just been
played by his most trusted friend, Piero della Vigna.
The details of the occurrences at Cremona are obscure. The
Emperor drew a veil over them and gossip distorted them.
Contemporaries heard little more than the fact of della Vigna's
sudden fall and his arrest. The obvious gu£ss was that the
Protonotary and Logothetes of Sicily had been bought by the
Pope, like so many others. So much, however, seems certain
that della Vigna was not conspiring with the Pope. No change
of thought prompted his treachery, no suddenly awakened
papalist spirit, no fanatical love of freedom stirred him against
the Tyrant whom yet he reverenced and loved : della Vigna was
no Brutus. Neither was he guiltless. It was not only envy,
" that harlot of courts," that brought the Capuan to his fall.
He sinned not as the defender of a lofty idea but as one who
sold his master for thirty pieces of silver.
As far as the evidence goes, it seems that the inconceivable
repeated itself : della Vigna betrayed his Lord for a handful of
silver by selling justice for money. Only once did the Emperor
quite briefly, in a confidential letter to Count Richard of
Caserta, betray his feeling about della Vigna's guilt, calling
him a " second Simon," who " that he might fill his purse or
keep it full, turned the rod of justice into a serpent." Della
Vigna had always been exposed to terrific temptation. All
letters and petitions went through his hands, he decided what
must be referred and what might be independently disposed
of. Princes and kings, prelates and popes who had business
to transact with Frederick approached him through della
Vigna. Abusing his absolute discretion Piero della Vigna may
have taken money to let things pass which at this highly critical
1248 JUSTICE BARTERED 665
moment involved danger to the Emperor. Or, perhaps, as
overseer of the entire accounts of the Sicilian kingdom he may
have connived at embezzlements by his subordinates, or himself
committed them. He left an immense fortune, and how far it
was honourably acquired the Emperor must have known pretty
exactly. Embezzlement at such a time of money-famine would
not be far short of treason. Apart from the major defalcation,
della Vigna may well, as Frederick further wrote to Caserta,
" by systematic swindling have driven the Imperium into such
danger that Empire and Emperor like the Egyptian chariots and
the hosts of Pharaoh might have been drowned in the depths
Of the sea."
Bribery and embezzlement must have been indulged in by
the majority of the officials, but this does not lighten della
Vigna's guilt ; it aggravates it rather. The other officials were
merely disobeying the laws. Della Vigna had himself in the
Emperor 's name promulgated those laws. He had formulated
and defined them ; with his own words as the mouthpiece of
the Emperor he had condemned the bartering of Justice and
stigmatised it as " simony, " He had for money betrayed the
whole worship of the imperialis ecclesia which was based on
"the lawbringer Moses" and the "Vicar Petrus" which he,
like a very apostle had evolved and represented. If Piero della
Vigna himself could not preserve clean hands, could not him
self live the laws that he proclaimed, it was calculated to shake
the world's faith in the Emperor, as the shortcoming of a
justiciar or a vicar could not do. A crime that an ordinary
official might unobtrusively expiate by loss of office became in
della Vigna's case a fall that shook the world.
There is no doubt that Frederick would have overlooked
many little irregularities as long as it was possible to do so in
order to retain his nearest counsellor, his ablest intimate.
Arrest will not have occurred until Piero della Vigna's behaviour
had become a danger to the State, and the jealousy of the other
courtiers may well have precipitated the climax. What amazes
the observer is the disproportion between the advantage gained
and the advantages lost by this treachery. On the one hand
the master, honoured as the Saviour, perhaps at last believed
and proclaimed a Saviour by della Vigna alone ... on the other
666 POISON ix
the silver. . . . There is something grotesque in this incom
mensurability : there is something sinister. The power and
magic of great men are shattered not by the world's great
resistances, on these they thrive, but by the pettiness of human
frailty.
The discovery of Piero della Vigna's breach of faith and the
arrest were terrible for Frederick, the more because at this same
moment he escaped poison by a hair's breadth, poison proffered
by one of his entourage. His physician, whom he completely
trusted, and whom he had ransomed from Parma because he
could not do without him, prepared a poisoned bath and a
poisoned draught to meet some trifling indisposition. At the
last moment the Emperor was warned. When the doctor
handed him the goblet Frederick said — so the story goes — that
they must be careful not to give him poison instead of medicine.
The doctor sought to reassure him. Frederick looked at him :
" Drink to my health and share the draught with me." The
doctor feigned to stumble, and, falling, contrived to spill most
of the contents of the goblet. The Emperor's guards seized
him. What was left was given to a condemned criminal to
drink. He died on the instant. The Emperor is said then,
reflecting on what had passed, to have wrung his hands and
groaned aloud : " alas for me, my very bowels fight against me !
Whom can I trust ! Where can I again be happy and secure ! "
And his friends sat round and sighed with him and wept.
After this the words of Job were often in the Emperor's mouth :
" All my inward friends abhorred me, and they whom I loved
are turned against me."
Contemporaries associated the doctor's attempt with Piero
della Vigna's sudden fall. They were two quite independent
episodes which happened to occur at the same time. The
doctor had been captured at Parma and had been won over by
the Pope's legate ; " the Pope's reputation was blackened not
a little," a chronicler writes. Frederick informed the kings
and people of the world of this new effort of the Pope's. " This
priest, this shepherd, this peace-loving director of our faith is
not content with the innumerable intrigues and shameful
VIGNA'S SUICIDE 667
machinations with which he has disgraced the rule of his order
to do us injury but— O shame ! — he has just attempted to
murder us by secret means ! " After the events of the last few
days the Emperor can no longer doubt that the end of the times
is near. The doctor's fate matched his crime. Blinded and
mutilated, with continuous torture, so that no rest was given
him even on Sundays or on holy days, he was taken to Sicily
for execution.
A similar fate hung over Piero della Vigna. When the
Cremonese heard of his treachery they nearly tore and hacked
in pieces the man so lately feared. But Frederick prevented
mob justice and had the prisoner taken by night to the neigh
bouring Borgo San Donnino. In March when the Emperor
started for Tuscany he took Piero della Vigna with him mounted
on a donkey, amongst the baggage train. They took him to
San Miniato. They say that Frederick made use of his former
friend for a stratagem. The Guelfs in San Miniato would not
permit the entrance of armed men. They were assured that
only the prisoners and the imperial exchequer were being
brought to the fortress. The baggage animals were, however,
loaded with weapons instead of treasure, and the ostensible
prisoners were imperial men-at-arms whose fetters could easily
be struck off. To disarm the Guelfs' suspicion, however, Piero
della Vigna had to lead the procession of prisoners. If the tale
is true, it was Frederick's last vengeance on his friend. Piero
della Vigna knew his master well enough to know that some
terrible death awaited him. He put himself beyond the fear
of torture: he, also, "went and hanged himself." The story
is that when the blinded prisoner was being led into the dungeon
of San Miniato he asked the guards whether anything lay
between him and the wall. They said not. The blind man
forthwith flung himself with such violence against the prison
wall that he split his skull. After these days of horror Frederick
proceeded to Pisa. On the Arno he embarked on his Sicilian
galleys to return to his mother country : for ever. He never
saw Italy again.
For more than a decade Frederick II had reigned and ruled
668 FREDERICK'S LEGACY ix
and raged in Italy as the Judge, the Caesar, the Antichrist, and
he had left his mark indelibly on the land. He had left a legacy
of " the majestic and the terrible. " Italy had altered more in
those ten years than sometimes in a century. The times had
gone mad with the intensity of life, with the enormous expen
diture of power, and Italy stood under the shadow of Dante in
the sign of the rising Renaissance. The Hohenstaufen had not
only a share in the change : he had been himself the immutator
mirabilis who dared to alter laws and times, a fact which the
Church cast in his teeth. It was high time that he should now
pass on. His mission was fulfilled. The sap was in circula
tion. Condottieri, signori, tyrants, as well as the wise, learned
and magnificent dukes of Florence, Urbino and Ferrara, finally
the towns and the city-states also, were all the heirs and in
heritors of Frederick IL
The image of Frederick as ruler and the image of Frederick's
state survived actually only in miniature. Spiritually they
received immense extension through Dante : in the de
Monarchici as well as in the state structure and cosmogony of
the Divine Comedy. It has often enough been demonstrated
that Dante only proclaims what Frederick II had lived. Since
the heretic Frederick II, his life, his acts, his thought, all
determined Dante's picture of a State, it was inevitable that
the poet should also be reckoned as a heretic. The implica
tions of his poem were not wholly understood, but the de
Monarchia was clear to all, especially as this dangerous Ghibel-
line document seemed about to be fulfilled by Louis the
Bavarian seven years after the poet's death. The papal legate
thereupon condemned the treatise as heretical and burnt it
publicly, and they even wanted to take the poet's remains out
of their Franciscan vault at Ravenna and burn them to " the
eternal disgrace and the ruin of his memory." The de
Monarchia was put on the Index of Forbidden Books and was
not removed therefrom till the days of Leo XIII in 1897.
Frederick II had created in Sicily the " mirror of likeness
for those who admire it," a visible mirror of princes for the
days to come. It was the structure of the State that was the
vital thing. The kingdom of Sicily itself lost all importance for
the world at large. This last Emperor was not destined, like
FREDERICK'S GENIUS 669
Caesar or like Charlemagne, to be the heros eponymos of a new
epoch, which bore his stamp on its secular statecraft and was
irradiated by his indwelling spirit. Frederick II dominated the
Renaissance anonymously and illegitimately. The establish
ment of the Norman despotism itself had been illegitimate, and
so, therefore, were the small Italian town-states which were
offshoots of the Sicilian parent state. The tyrants, too, were
illegitimate : the bodily or spiritual bastards, sons or grandsons,
of the Hohenstaufen, had each to win anew sua virtute the
Emperor's immediacy, since Frederick had only usurped it by
right of genius through an illegitimate priestship.
The Emperor's rule in Italy might easily have become
legitimate if the Lombards had been complaisant. It rested,
however, in fact, not on the privileges or rights of the excom
municate monarch but on his genius : what Machiavelli called
virtu , this combination of strength and talent, not incom
patible with evil. After this each of the Renaissance tyrants
had to show virtu or genius if he was to maintain his illegitimate
rule over his tiny State, Frederick II, statesman and philo
sopher, politician and soldier, general and jurist, poet and
diplomat, architect, zoologist, mathematician, the master of six
or it might be nine languages, who collected ancient works of
art, directed a school of sculpture, made independent researches
in natural science, and organised states, this supremely versatile
man was the Genius of the Renaissance on the throne of the
Emperors, was the Emperor of Genius. It is not without
deeper significance that this first genius of the Renaissance wore
the actual diadem of a world ruler, which in a sense still
crowned the later geniuses but no longer kept them within
the Empire,
So Frederick left Italy. The year of horror did not end with
his friends' death. He had lost within one year his two best
statesmen and most trusty comrades, in whose company he
had had his image carved over the triumphal gate of Capua,
Thaddeus of Suessa and Piero della Vigna. Now he lost two
sons. Soon after the Emperor's arrival in Naples, Count
Richard of Theate seems to have died. He had been Vicar
670 ENZIO A PRISONER ix
General of the Romagna and of Spoleto, and had just recently
distinguished himself by his victories over Hugo Novellus.
We do not know how much attached the Emperor was to him.
The news about King Enzio which shortly followed certainly
touched Frederick more.
Enzio had remained behind, as usual, to represent his father
in Lombardy. His marriage with the Sardinian heiress
Adelasia had been declared void, and Frederick had been
present at his marriage to a niece of Eccelino's at Cremona.
This relationship set the seal on the comradeship in arms of
two gallant men. The ceremony had taken place just about
the time of Piero della Vigna's arrest. The active young king
had no idea in life except fighting ; for ten years he had been
continuously crossing swords with the Lombards, and soon after
his wedding, in January 1249, ^e niarched against the Guelfs
of Reggio to undertake a campaign in the neighbourhood of
Parma. He had returned to his headquarters at Cremona when
he got an appeal from Modena for help against the Bolognese.
Off he hastened with his bodyguard, his " cohort " and the
knights of Cremona across the Po by his own bridge at Bugno
in the direction of Modena. At Fossalta in the frontier of the
Modena territory he got entangled in a small skirmish ; sud
denly the main forces of Bologna arrived and took a hand. In
the melee Enzio Js horse was killed under him, his troops began
to waver, and he was taken prisoner with four hundred knights
and twelve hundred foot-soldiers. Marinus of Eboli, well-
known as podesta and vicar, shared his fate.
The skirmish had in itself no serious importance, but the loss
of Enzio was for Frederick more severe than the loss of an army
or a province. The later battles of the Hohenstaufen heirs
might have worn a different complexion if King Enzio had been
there to keep the Ghibelline flag flying in Lombardy. The
Emperor at once set about procuring his son's release. He
first wrote a beautiful letter to the people of Bologna about the
Goddess Fortuna. " We read in the most various writings that
Fortuna knows many final acts. The evil fortune that now
weighs a man to earth may presently lift him to the heights.
And fortune often smiles on those she raises and yet casts them
down at last and scourges them and pierces them with wounds
BOLOGNA'S TRIUMPH 671
incurable. If ye, therefore, on this day, see fortune smiling on
you with unclouded brow ye would yet be wise to refrain from
being puffed up, for he who rises to the greater heights is the
worfce broken by the fall. Fortuna often promises success at
first ... but overfills the middle and concludes the end with
manifold misfortune." There breathes here a spirit of fore
boding. There is no longer any word of the Fortuna August!,
the Goddess who obeys the Caesar. The Emperor, however, is
not bankrupt of proud words as he demands Enzio's liberty.
" Ask ye of your fathers and they will tell how our grandfather
of most happy and glorious memory, the all-conquering
Frederick, drove out that generation of Milan from their lares
and divided up their town into three parcels. If ye surrender
Enzio our beloved son, King of Sardinia and Gallura, from his
prison, we shall exalt your town above every town in Lombardy.
But if ye hearken not to the voice of our commandment then
expect our triumphant and unnumbered army. The traitors
of Liguria shall not avail to deliver you out of our hands, but
ye shall become a fable and a disgrace to the nations and this
shall be held as a reproach against you for ever."
The Emperor's letter bore no fruit, Bologna's answer was
that a cane non magno saepe tenetur aper, and Frederick must
know that they had held, and did hold, and would continue .to
hold, King Enzio. The suggestion of exchanging Enzio for
the son of the Count of Montferrat whom Frederick had cap
tured was not acceptable, neither was the offer to buy his
freedom by laying a ring of silver round the town for ransom.
King Enzio was fated to live and die a prisoner. The early
fame of the young warrior formed henceforth a halo round the
royal captive. The people of Bologna had chained the imperial
king with golden fetters when they led him in triumph through
their town, following the fashion set by the Emperor. Legend
tells us that the young king in his royal dress, with his long
golden hair under the flashing helmet-crown, set the hearts of
the populace afire, not only of the beautiful womenfolk. The
men of Bologna no less met with admiration and respect the
young hero who bore with justice a lion in his shield. His
confinement was strict but never degrading. A large hall in
the podesta's palace was assigned to him, in which he and his
672 SAD SONGS ix
well-born fellow-prisoners could spend the day. Only at night
he was shut into a small chamber of wood and iron that had
been erected in the middle of the apartment. This is the
origin of the legend that he was kept in an iron cage. He was
allowed to correspond freely with the outside world and to
receive as many visitors as he would. In later times he lived
at the expense of the commune, for he was so extravagant that
in spite of his large means he was presently reduced to poverty.
His fellow-prisoners soon left, and only one German count,
Conrad of Solimburg, shared his captivity. The Bolognese
themselves counted Conrad an intolerably effeminate little
creature. The king found him at last so wearisome that he
begged his captors to spare him this companionship.
Except for his own servants Enzio's only friends were the
Ghibellines of Bologna, the Lambertacci, who frequently
visited him and with one of whom, Pietro Asinelli, he formed
an intimate friendship. Visitors of the other sex were not
lacking. People tell how the beautiful Lucia Viadagola took
pity on him, and his two natural daughters probably belong to
the twenty-three years of his captivity.
In the early days his imprisonment was quite endurable.
He bore it with unclouded serenity and was often able to cheer
his guards or visitors by singing his songs to them. He
guarded the volume of his poems as a treasure and mentioned
it in his will. His songs were pretty if not profound, such
as befitted this gifted but simple warrior, singer and king.
Gradually, as all hope of freedom died away, they lost their
lightheartedness. There is a sad sonnet about the ever-
changing demands of changing time . . . there is a still sadder
canzone which Enzio sent to Tuscany, the land of noble living,
where he had worked in the most brilliant days of his father's
reign, in the days when Faenza fell and the prelates were caught
at sea.
Va, canzonetta mia . . .
Salutami Toscana
Quella che de sovraua
In cui regna tutta cortesia,
E vanne in Puglia piana
La magna Capitana
La dov' & lo mio core nott' e dia.
THE DOOM OF A HOUSE 673
Enzio was probably familiar with Apulia and the Capitanata
from childhood, for these were his father's favourite provinces.
Here the captive king's brothers and nephews were presently
to fight a losing fight against Frenchmen and priests, and
were to succumb one after another while still scarcely out of
boyhood.
Enzio had to witness, from his prison, the whole tragic dis
appearance of the imperial House of Hohenstaufen, ever hoping
for freedom, ever doubly disappointed and deceived. A year
after the Emperor's death the news reached him that his half-
brother, King Conrad, the heir of the Empire, was coming to
Italy. Conrad had been spending Christmas night in the
monastery of St. Emmeram in Ratisbon, and had only by a
miracle escaped a treacherous attempt on his life by the abbot,
his host. He had abandoned the lonely, hopeless fight in the
north, had precipitately mortgaged, sold, or given away all his
German possessions and come south. He hoped to make
Sicily a base, as his father had done, for war against the Church
on behalf of the Empire. From the first the cause was lost.
The burden of intolerable responsibility on his young shoulders
had made the boy prematurely bitter and gloomy. He knew
very little about Sicilian conditions. Though he was the son
of the Syrian Isabella and had been born in Apulia he was
unaccustomed to the climate. After more than two years of
joyless undistinguished activity he died of fever at scarcely
twenty-six. The corpse was taken to Messina and before the
consecration was consumed in a great conflagration. Other
people said that Manfred was jealous and had poisoned his
brother, and that enemies had thrown the body into the sea.
In those first years, when the Emperor was no longer there to
bear the brunt of fate, other Hohenstaufen sons fell victims to
the doom of their house. King Henry, the son of the English
Isabella, had died at the age of fifteen, and here the rumour
ran that King Conrad had had his brother assassinated by the
black Grand Chamberlain , Johannes Maurus , Two years after
Conrad's death Frederick of Antioch, who had had to give up
674 MANFRED ix
the attempt to maintain himself in Tuscany, was killed in battle
against Foggia (1256), which Cardinal Ottaviano degli Ubaldini
had garrisoned.
Just at this time Manfred's star began to mount. He was
prince of Taranto. With the help of relatives and friends he
won by force or cunning or genius, with or without right, the
crown of Sicily. With snow-white skin and pink cheeks and
eyes like stars (Dante calls him " comely and fair and gentle of
aspect," and praises him as the pattern of an Italian prince) he
restored something of the old brilliance to his father's court.
Hohenstaufen wit sparkled once more ; Hohenstaufen hospi
tality andjoie de vtvre blossomed again in the southern kingdom ;
again the royal falcons rose and stooped ; the king conversed
again with oriental and western philosophers. Almost more
numerous than the warriors were the minstrels and fiddlers who
hummed around the irresponsible young prodigal, who with
his friend Manfred Maletta himself composed airs and can
zones, crowding the fulness of a lifetime into the space of a
few years. Manfred seemed to be reviving the Italico- Sicilian
rule of the Hohenstaufens as well as the brilliance of the court.
The victory at Montaperti on the Arbia was full of promise and
made Manfred dream even of the imperial crown. He did not
know, however, how to follow up the victory, and before long
he was busy defending his kingdom against Anjou, whom the
Church had called in.
The young king was said to possess a magic ring with which
he could conjure demons (Pope Boniface used later to wear it) ;
but this did not avail. If the Hohenstaufens loved life they
also knew how to die. The battle of Benevento was as good
as lost when Manfred, armed by a tearful aged servant of the
Emperor's, plunged into the fray in which he perished. Not
for some days was his body found under the pile of corpses.
They knew it by its beauty. His friends, captives now
themselves, drew it forth with trembling hands and covered
their dead king's feet and hands with kisses. Victorious
Anjou gave King Manfred a grave beside the bridge over
the Liris at Benevento. But the revengeful Pope, so runs
the tale, would not permit the body to rest there. The arch
bishop of Cosenza dug up the royal corpse and gave it shallow
CONRADIN 675
burial in the sand close by the river, so that the remains were
washed away :
. . . but the rain now drenches them
And the wind drives, out of the kingdom's bounds,
Far as the stream of Verde, where, with lights
Extinguished, he removed them from their bed.
Thus Manfred in Purgatory tells the poet.
Manfred's consort, Helena, was some twenty-four years of
age. With three sons and her one daughter she fell into the
hands of Anjou and died after five years' imprisonment. The
daughter, Beatrice, after eighteen years of confinement in the
Castel dell' Ovo at Naples was set free by the Sicilian Vespers.
The sons grew up literally in chains. They were unfettered
after thirty years but still kept prisoner. Half-starved, reduced
to beggary, driven to madness one after another, the two heirs
of Manfred died in prison : " the brood of poison-swollen
adders."
Before leaving his wife Elizabeth behind in Bavaria King
Conrad begot a son called Conradin. This nephew of Enzio's
now came to Italy. Once more the Ghibellines took heart.
The tall slight boy was hailed as " the most handsome child a
man could find." He was received with enthusiasm in the
quondam imperialist towns of northern Italy, Verona and Pavia,
Pisa and Siena. He was fifteen when he left his Swabian home
with his friend Francis of Baden, who was three years older.
" In order that the glorious race to which we belong may not
degenerate in our person," the proud boy said as he journeyed
south. It seemed as if the ancient Hohenstaufen dreams were
to be at last fulfilled. What had lured on the Puer Apuliae
from afar, but what the giant Emperor and Caesar Frederick II
had never achieved, was granted to young Conradin. He rode
beside his friend into Ghibelline Rome as Felix Victor ac
Triumphator. His cousin, Henry of Castile, Senator of
the Eternal City, handed over the town to him. Triumphal
arches stretched across his path all the way from the Bridge of
S. Angelo to the Capitol, ropes were slung across the streets
from house to house, on which carpets, silks and purples were
676 DEATH OF CONRADIN ix
hung. Choirs of Roman women sang songs of welcome to the
last Hohenstaufen king, while the men already acclaimed him
Emperor as they led him to the Capitol. It was Ghibelline
Rome welcoming the Hohenstaufen, and the Romans whom
the thunder-voice of Frederick had so often roused from their
lazy slumber remembered now that they were of the blood of
Romulus, remembered the triumphs and the laurels Frederick
won for them of old, and did homage to his grandson. In
Sicily the Saracens of Lucera revolted against the hated
Angevin as soon as they heard that a Hohenstaufen was coming
again to his hereditary kingdom.
Less than four weeks later catastrophe followed triumph.
Conradin had scarcely entered Sicily when he was defeated by
cunning at Tagliacozzo and betrayed as he fled. He fell a
captive into the hands of Anjou, and with him the rest of his
family, Conradin of Caserta, Thomas Aquino, Henry of Castile,
whose brother Frederick had educated at his court, and several
Lancias. Only Conrad of Antioch escaped and carried on a
relentless guerilla war against the French. All the others were
victims of a cruel fate. Aquino was condemned to death.
Conradin of Caserta spent thirty-two years in prison, at Castel
del Monte, Henry of Castile was captive for twenty years, the
Lancias, Galvano and Frederick, were executed, the father after
his son ; a half-brother of Conradin's, yet another Conradin,
was hanged in Lucera. Conradin, sitting playing chess with
his friend Frederick of Baden, learned the fate reserved for
them both. An unheard-of decision of Anjou's — to send to
the scaffold a king taken in battle. The majority of the judges
refused to concur in the sentence. The execution took place
in the Frenchman's presence in the market square of Naples,
witnessed by a thronging crowd, curious to see a king's decapi
tation. As the head fell to the ground an eagle swooped to
earth, trailed his right wing in the blood of the last of the
Hohenstaufen kings, and thus stained soared again to heaven
— so men said.
" How can the Germans bear to live " — queries a Venetian
troubadour — " when they think upon this end ! They have
lost their bravest and their best and have reaped disgrace I
Unless they avenge themselves they are dishonoured ! " The
1272 DEATH OF ENZIO 677
night after the death of Conradin the earth trembled ; but the
Germans felt no earthquake. They thought not of revenge.
Nay, Rudolf of Hapsburg, to gratify the Pope, solemnly re
nounced the right of vengeance on Anjou. Never has the
blood-stained eagle yet been purged ; never have German
vespers followed the Sicilian. M The southern peoples seemed
more moved and grieved than the Germans," the German
chronicler confesses with surprise, when the royal corpses were
shovelled into the shallow sand " as if the sea had spewed them
forth. " The German princes shuddered, and Conradin was
mourned in Worms and Strasburg on the Upper Rhine, but all
the great body of Germany lay dull and stupid and unmoved.
Better this, perhaps, than imitating the Meissner poet, who
patted as it were the fallen king patronisingly on the shoulder
with a " pride goeth before a fall " and a " why fly so far afield,"
or the schoolmaster who wrote a comic poem on Conradin who
had been playing the children's game of <£ peep " and " heads
off " with Anjou and had lost it. This characteristically Ger
man obtuseness in face of greatness, fate, and human dignity,
makes the miracle the more astounding that such heroes could
have sprung from such a people.
The hapless Enzio, forgotten in his Bologna prison, lived to
hear the tale of Conradin. He was now himself the last of all
that brilliant race. He must take up the thread again and spin
it on, avenge the blood of the slain, sacrifice himself and die
like them. He had been twenty years a captive, he was over
fifty, but he must escape since there was no Staufen left alive
but he. He negotiated with friends and bribed a gigantic
cellarer named Filippo to carry him forth one evening in an
empty cask. Pietro Asinelli was to be in waiting with horses
for the king. Everything worked according to plan. Filippo
had reached the street with his burden when a woman spied
a long lock of golden hair flowing from the bung. In all
Bologna was no such hair but Enzio's ! She shrieked ; all was
discovered ; the cellarer was beheaded and King Enzio more
strictly watched. Not for long. He died within two years,
in 1272.
The Bolognese accorded him a royal funeral. In scarlet
robes, with sceptre, sword and diadem, he was buried in San
678 " OUR PROUD HEAD " ix
Domenico according to his own request. The curse on the
Staufen house did not perish with him. His children were
swept into the tragedy of another race. His only legitimate
daughter was married to Guelfo da Donoratico della Gherar-
desca of Pisa. An old nobleman, a relation of Guelfo 's, had
already shared Conradin's fate. A grandson of Enzio's shared
the fate of his father's father and perished with Count Ugolino
in the dreaded hunger-tower of Pisa.
The unforgiveable sin was Staufen blood. Never in historic
times had a jealous God demanded through his priesthood such
expiation : " Root out the name and fame, the seed and sapling
of this Babylonian ! " Frederick had no presentiment of what
Fate had in store for his sons. If he had he could scarcely
have challenged Nemesis by writing to cheer his family after
the battle of Fossalta and the capture of Enzio : " Though this
misfortune — since we must call it so — seems as in fairytale or
nightmare terribly severe, yet is our cause not lost. We accept
this reverse as slight or even negligible, nor is our proud head
bowed. The accidents of war are manifold but OUR ILLUSTRIOUS
QUIVER is FILLED WITH MANY SONS. We learn such news
therefore with calm ; and our powerful right arm is thereby
strengthened the more vigorously to pursue the destruction of
our rebels."
The doom of the house of Hohenstaufen is comparable to
the fate of the children of Niobe. Frederick was spared the
sight of his sons' long martyrdom. One of the uncanny " Anti-
christian " things about him is that in spite of the heavy blows
fate dealt him in the later years the arch-offender himself
escaped anything like adequate expiation of his guilt. His life
and strife to the last hour did not lack glory.
" Nor is our proud head bowed/' Frederick had written.
It is a fact that his last year showed neither weariness nor
dejection, nor any relaxation of his tense activity. An actual
rejuvenation seems rather to have renewed his powers. He
wrote in friendly wise to his contemporary Eccelino how fully
he realised that Eccelino ys loyalty grew warmer with the years
" as a renewal of mental vigour accompanies the ageing of the
TIDE TURNS 679
body/' In reply to Eccelino's kind enquiries he could assure
his friend that while thoughts of the Empire and the rebels were
ever with him, he was happy, and his physique which had been
somewhat severely taxed by the Italian campaigns was now
responding to the comfort and treatment of home.
Frederick was even contemplating a new marriage with the
daughter of Duke Albert of Saxony. His return to Sicily had
had a double purpose, first to restore order in the administration
and finance which under Piero della Vigna had of late fallen
into confusion, and, secondly, to make the necessary prepara
tions for the following year "to turn his steps joyfully to
Germany " as he expressed it. He had long been promising
King Conrad a visit.
The political situation seemed every month to favour such
plans more. A few ugly items of news had followed King
Enzio's capture : the defection of Como, the capitulation of
Modena, which the Bolognese took after a siege, the renewed
loss of the Cisa Pass. The beginning of 1250, however, saw
the fortune of war set again in the Emperor's favour It began
in the Romagna. Ravenna, which had twice proved false, had
once more been won for the Emperor by the loyal Counts of
Bagnacavallo and the March of Ancona was following suit.
The papal legate of the March, Peter Capoccio, had been in
structed to invade Sicily, but before the banner of the Keys
could cross the Sicilian frontier he was utterly defeated with a
loss of two thousand dead. Two of his nephews were taken
prisoner. A few months later the imperial troops took Cingoli
in the March and the Cardinal escaped capture by the skin of
his teeth. A whole series of towns returned to their allegiance,
so that Frederick was able to announce to his Byzantine son-
in-law that Spoleto, the Romagna, and the March were his
once more.
Frederick of Antioch's position in Florence was not so happy.
The imperial government of Tuscany could only be maintained
by perpetual petty fighting. Some Florentine troops in
Frederick's service were surprised by the Guelfs on a campaign
in the Arezzo neighbourhood, and in the autumn of 1250 a
distinct change of atmosphere was noticeable in Florence. Not
that the Florentines went over to the Pope or rebelled against
680 PALLAVICINI ix
the Emperor, but they were the first commune to form a non-
party popolo regardless of Ghibelline or Guelf . Henceforth
all the forces which Frederick had hitherto sacrificed on the
altar of the Empire should be diverted to the service of the town
itself. The imperial podesta, however, remained for the dura
tion of Frederick's life. The very night following the Emperor's
death the house fell in and the imperial official was buried in
the ruins.
Central Lombardy was the scene of really big successes.
The one-eyed Margrave, Hubert Pallavicini, was proving a most
distinguished successor to King Enzio. Possibly Hubert's
despotic savagery was more effective than Enzio's chivalrous
battle-loving bonhomie. Hubert was famous as the inventor
of new tortures : he would hang a victim up naked by his feet
and break his teeth one by one.
Frederick knew just how to handle this most ambitious man.
Eccelino enjoyed practical independence and guaranteed the
Brenner ; similarly, the Count of Savoy was guardian of the
passes into Burgundy ; Hubert Pallavicini was in like manner
to cover the Cisa Pass. Frederick, therefore, made over to him
some fifty small villages and hamlets in the neighbourhood, so
that the Emperor's cause was his own. A number of these
estates lay in the Parma domain, and the Margrave took the
field with his Cremonese against this hated town. On the very
spot where the Emperor's care-free town of Victoria had stood
a battle was fought in which Parma lost three thousand dead
and captured and lost also their standard-bearing chariot,
Cremona was avenged for the carroccio she had lost at Victoria.
Parma long remembered this " Black Thursday." Dante once,
in a letter to Florence, exhorting his townsmen not to oppose
the advancing Henry of Luxemburg, recalls the episode :
" Let not yourselves be lured to foolhardiness by the incredible
good fortune of the people of Parma who in ill-advised pas
sionate greed . . . burst into Caesar's camp in Caesar's absence.
They brought home victory from Victoria but they also drew
down on themselves sorrow from sorrow." The effects of this
victory of Pallavicini were felt also in the Bologna direction.
ST. LOUIS A PRISONER 681
The men of that city sent messengers to Frederick to treat of
peace. But Frederick refused to negotiate about anything save
Enzio's release.
Hubert Pallavicini was successful in other matters. He
reduced the political confusion of Cremona by a firm re
organisation of the imperial partisans who called themselves
" the Beardless " Barbarasi. He soon got into touch with
Piacenza also, a town traditionally anti-Kaiser. Ere long it
renounced its old alliance with Milan and elected to be ruled
by Pallavicini, whose strength men feared and trusted.
The fleet now came once more to the fore again. Peter of
Gaeta, the new Sicilian admiral, succeeded in conquering
seventeen Genoese ships with their crews, by an attack in the
neighbourhood of Savona.
The Pope's prospects began to look bleak in Italy. Nor were
things brighter for him in Germany, for in the summer of 1250
King Conrad had undertaken a great Rhenish campaign against
William of Holland, which had happily led to a truce with the
archbishops on the Rhine. In Avignon and Aries the inhabi
tants had renewed their oaths of fealty to the imperial envoys
in spite of the Pope's utmost efforts to alienate them from the
Hohenstaufen cause. Pope Innocent IV had little stomach left
for further fighting. His money and his troops were almost
exhausted ; less than ever could he count on the French king
even for the most trivial service. King Louis had had some
initial successes in his Egyptian Crusade, but had been taken
prisoner at Mansurah with almost his entire army. In com
mon with countless others he laid the blame for this disaster at
the Pope's door. For in spite of Louis' instant entreaties the
Pope had refused peace with the Emperor, and hence prevented
Frederick from lending " an assistance more potent than
letters" in these overseas adventures. The Pope, moreover,
still diverted, as far as he was able, those who had taken the
cross to war against Frederick and thus robbed the Crusade of
full support.
Frederick skilfully exploited the spreading discontent. From
the beginning he had furthered Saint Louis' undertaking to the
682 JUBILANT LETTERS ix
utmost of his power, and when the news of the French King's
capture reached him in Apulia he wrote immediately to the
Egyptian Sultan, the son of al Kamil, and begged the king's
release. The commander-in-chief of the Saracen army was
Frederick's old friend Fakhru'd Din, and the French were not
a little surprised to see the Roman eagle flashing in the shield
of the infidel, an early gift of Frederick to his friend.
A change of dynasty in Egypt, however, had enabled Louis
to purchase his freedom for a large ransom without awaiting
Frederick's intervention. He then proceeded to Acre. The
hopes of the French king and of the Crusaders were centred in
help from Frederick, the chosen Leader of Crusades. Even
one of the Templars (whose order Frederick had bitterly
persecuted for years) wrote from the Holy Land that Chris
tian and Saracen alike believed that the Emperor could have
averted the fiasco of this Crusade if the Pope's conceit had not
prevented his participation. " Truly all our hope lies in
Frederick's bosom," wrote the Templar. The whole world
agreed. King Louis charged his brothers, whom he sent back
from Acre, most insistently to demand that the Pope make
peace with the Emperor, otherwise the French would drive him
out of Lyons. Innocent, in perturbation, addressed himself
thereupon to the English king, begging him to offer the Curia
asylum in Bordeaux. The English king hesitated to permit
this change of domicile, for Innocent IV had filled England with
unfathomable hate.
Frederick II seemed near the goal of his desire, an alliance
of all the secular princes against the Pope. At the beginning
of 1250 the Greek Emperor Vatatzes had sent considerable
auxiliaries, and only the stirring events in Egypt, so Frederick
wrote to the Castilian king, had detained Frederick so long in
Apulia, that he might be near at hand. The journey to Ger
many and a call at Lyons were plans ever present to Frederick's
mind. His power had not for many years been so assured as
now. Victory waited on his banners everywhere, and he was
able to send one jubilant message after another to Vatatzes,
" To let one letter follow on another, bringing good news of
victories, rejoices not only those who are related by ties of
blood and of unfeigned affection but rejoices every friend," he
1250 DEATH 683
wrote, concluding with full assurances of success : " and thus
our divine glory re-inforced by the providence of heaven, leads
and directs the Empire in order and in peace."
In this moment of brilliant, almost unhoped-for, fulfilment,
when the power of the Empire seemed unimpaired and the
Imperator himself rejoicing in action and ready for the fray ;
when east and west alike were turning their gaze with eager
expectation on the monarch of the world, at this moment of
suddenly intensified glory the Emperor was reft from the arena.
Frederick II died on the I3th of December, 1250, the feast of
St. Lucy, shortly before the completion of his fifty-sixth year,
an age that seems to belong to a certain group of heroes and
rulers.
In the early days of December he had been staying at Foggia.
He seemed perfectly fit in spite of several slight indispositions
during the year. Then he had left the palace, presumably on
a hunting expedition, and later legends tell that while hunting
he had turned on his finger the magic ring of Prester John and
suddenly disappeared from sight. The fact was, however, that
a severe attack of fever drove him to take refuge in Castel
Fiorentino which he had never visited before. The dysentery
which he had foolishly been neglecting turned to gastric in
flammation, and he seems to have realised from the first that
this illness was to be his last . He must himself have summoned
at once his chief state officials, for within a day or two he had
with him Archbishop Berard of Palermo, Lord Chief Justice
Richard of Montenero, several High Court Judges, notaries,
etc. The other faithful adherents who were with him in these
last days were probably part of his permanent household.
They included the eighteen-year-old Manfred, who was then
the nearest and dearest of all his sons ; Count Berthold of
Hohenburg, to whose friendship the Emperor commended the
boy ; Pietro Ruffo, Master of the Royal Stables, with his nephew
Folco Ruffo, one of the young poets of the Sicilian school to
whom Frederick had recently been showing marks of great
favour ; his son-in-law Count Richard of Caserta ; and, lastly,
684 FREDERICK'S WILL ix
the physician John of Procida whose name is linked with the
Sicilian Vespers that spelt the fate of the Anjous.
Frederick II never left Castel Fiorentino, and the oracle that
had foretold that he was destined to die sub flore was here ful
filled. The man who had, they said, hoped " to defy Nature "
and live for ever, had in vain avoided Florence all his life. The
illness lasted a few days only. Shortly before his death
Frederick II, in the presence of his faithful friends,* drew up
his last testament: Conrad was to be heir -of the Empire as a
whole ; Manfred, Prince of Taranto and Vicar of the Italian-
Sicilian state. Arrangements for legacies, pious foundations
and the like were made. All prisoners were to be released,
except traitors. The Church was to recover her possessions
on condition of rendering to Caesar the things that were
Caesar's. Frederick anticipated that his sons would carry on
the fight. The witnesses signed the will : first among them the
octogenarian Archbishop Berard of Palermo, who had accom
panied the Puer Apuliae on his first dash to Germany, and was
now about to render him the last rites. Then Frederick,
showing himself therein a greater man than the giants Eccelino
and Pallavicini, asked for absolution, donned the grey habit of
a Cistercian and received the last sacrament from the hand of
Archbishop Berard, in death as in life preserving the restraint
and dignity that beseem a Christian-Roman Emperor.
Frederick had given instructions that his obsequies should
be carried out without ostentation. He probably also gave
orders that the news of his death should be kept from the public
as long as possible to avoid premature disturbance throughout
the Empire. Manfred, however, did not allow the ceremonies
to lack pomp or reverence as the body was conveyed first to
Messina and then to Palermo. In the cathedral of Palermo,
beside the tombs of King Roger II and the imperial parents
Henry VI and his great consort Constance, Frederick was laid
to rest in the majestic sarcophagus of dark-red porphyry which
more than twenty years ago he had himself transferred from
Cefalu to Palermo to await his mortal remains. The sarcoph
agus is borne on four porphyry lions carved with mysterious
south-Italian pagan symbols dating from prehistoric times ; one
of them with his claws is guarding a Hercules. The lid is
1250 INVICTUS 685
ornamented with the symbols of the four evangelists and the
figure of the Emperor himself. The ruler was no longer
shrouded in the Cistercian habit, but wrapped in a garment of
Arabian silk into which were woven the symbols of world
lordship and writings in exotic script.
Frederick had passed away in the full glory of imperial power.
The faithful hailed him as the vas electum Dei . . . " overcome
by the might of God alone whom the might of the children of
men had not availed to overcome " ..." the unconquered "
. , . " the mightiest of heroes " . . . " the greatest of the princes
of the earth, the admiration of the world and her most mar
vellous transformer. " Frederick suffered no martyrdom, nor
bore the wounds St. Francis bore. The last Emperor of the
Romans disappeared from amidst his followers in the radiant
glory of the Imperator Invictus, and was spared the knowledge
of the tragic fate that overhung his house. His life closed with
the " transfiguration " into the Emperor of the End. His im
perial career had described no curve, had known neither climax
nor decline. From birth his line of life ran arrow-straight to
its zenith, then quitted earth and vanished like a comet in the
ether : perchance to reappear once more in fiery brilliance at
the end of time. Ere long the sibyls spake : HE LIVES AND HE
LIVES NOT.
Frederick was the last emperor to be deified or to find a place
among the stars of heaven. In life they had hailed him as a
" Sun King." A notary and master of Frederick of Antioch
writes "a new Sun is born: peace and fame, and haven and
way." At the time of the great conspiracy another had written ,
" they sought to rob the world of her Sun," and again " Satan
would fain have erected his rival throne beside the Sun God
(deltas soKs)" These are not the traditional commonplace
metaphors applied to any powerful Emperor, they are com
parisons belonging to a certain cycle of thought. The poet has
in mind the great Vergilian prophecy of a Saviour and when
he celebrates the Emperor's " sacred posterity," " like a radiant
sun begotten by the sun," or praises Conrad the imperial heir
686 ETNA ix
as the " unifying king at whose feet lieth the universe and to
whom God smileth " ; these and countless other turns of phrase
belong to the messianic idea.
Manfred writes to King Conrad of their father's death : " the
sun of the world has set, the sun which lightened the peoples ;
the sun of Justice has set, the treasure of Peace. " Within a
month the Emperor's followers are writing in the style of the
Tiburtine Sibyl, " like the sun when he sinks from the heaven
into the Western Sea, Frederick has left a son-sun in the west
and already the crimson of the dawn begins to glow." Here
is the age-old cult of Sol Invictus, revivified by prophecy, which
a thousand years before had fused with the cult of a Saviour
and had now lent itself to an Emperor, Frederick II, who him
self was born within a day of the birth of Christ and of the Sun,
who had died in December and would return in his own time
at the end of time to establish the kingdom of heaven.
Prophecies and sibylline sayings multiplied themselves with
out end. Men knew that the Roman Empire closed with
Frederick ; it was said and said again. The people did not
believe that Frederick was dead. The Pope had too often
announced the Emperor's death and the fall of the Empire.
After great promises people were still awaiting greater deeds ;
they were readier to believe in a ruse of the resourceful Emperpr
than in his death. Many years after his death wagers were still
laid in Florence as to whether Frederick was alive or not, since
the prophets had promised him a life of two hundred and sixty-
seven years. For decades to come impostors gave themselves
out for the returning Emperor, who was believed to be in con
cealment in Etna or where not. Mons Gebellus was clearly
the appropriate dwelling-place of the Ghibelline Emperor and
philosopher whom men feared like Satan. One of these sham
Fredericks established himself there and was styled Emperor,
and was honoured and worshipped as the Lord. A Sicilian
Franciscan told how he had been sunk in prayer beside the sea
and had suddenly seen a mighty train of five thousand armed
horsemen riding towards the shore and plunging into the sea.
Then the sea hissed as if all the riders had been armed in
glowing metal, and one of the horsemen said to the astonished
monk " that was Kaiser Frederick, riding into Etna with his
INTERREGNUM 687
men." This vision, which recalls the death of the great King
of the Goths Dietrich of Bern, was said to have visited the
brother at the very moment that Frederick died.
The rumour of a mysterious disappearance of Frederick was
not slow in reaching Germany. The Sibyl had foretold : " The
Empire shall end with him ; his successors, if any he shall have,
shall be bereft of the Roman throne and the imperial name/'
The chaos of the Interregnum saw the literal fulfilment of the
prophecy. Germany had kings enough and to spare : William
of Holland, Alfonso of Castile, Richard of Cornwall; but no
ruler. The world had never seen before on such a scale the
spectacle that followed the death of the Emperor : the complete
disintegration in a night of the proud structure of government,
the incoherence of all German happenings. The dismay which
gripped the Germans is even more evident in art than in history :
the glorious pride and freedom of Hohenstaufen days lay in
the dust.
South of the Alps Frederick's legacy was the image of the
" terrible " blent with the " majestic " which stemmed the
inflowing tide of the God of Souls. Nothing of this touched
the Germans in the North. Goethe's saying already held of
them : " they are more apt to perceive the Good than the
Beautiful." To them Frederick was no Apollo, no Sol In-
victus, neither the God of the Sibyls nor the Bringer of the
kingdom of the Sun God. The terrifying vision of Antichrist
sweeping in storm above the clouds carried more conviction,
for here only the degenerate Church stood at the judgment bar.
Germany also refused to believe in the death of this great
Emperor, and decades later impostors would still appear as the
risen Kaiser. The pre-Christian God with whom men here
identified Frederick was not Apollo but Woden. He appeared
as " The Wanderer " to the peasants to announce :
Once again shall he come home
The mighty emperor of Rome.
The reformation of the Church appeared the most important
mission of the " Awaited One," to flog and scourge the priests
till they should hide their tonsures with cow-dung. So per
sistent was the conception of the redeeming saviour as a figure
688 KYFFHAUSER ix
of awe and horror that after the Great Plague people hailed the
dread leader of the Flagellants as Kaiser Frederick.
Even in Germany other attributes, however, clung round
Frederick's name, wisdom and majesty and glory, though the
beauty and the radiance had not impressed themselves on the
northern people as on the Italians. Frederick would come
again, though he had been cut into pieces or burnt to ashes, he
would come to raise the Empire of the Germans to glory and
to brilliance. He would bring justice and peace, he would hang
the shield on the dry tree and lay down the sceptre of the world.
Until the hour should strike when he would sit in judgment
on a corrupt Church and gloriously renew the Empire's might
the northern peoples dreamt of him as withdrawn into some
fastness of the mountains. The sagas pitched on Kyffhauser in
Thuringia as his hiding-place ; perhaps because a grandson of
Frederick II's, Frederick the Peaceful, lived on till the opening
of the fourteenth century, the son of the illustrious Henry of
Meissen, and people longed to find in him the wished for
Frederick III. Whatever associations of glory and brilliance
the " Emperor " retained in the people's dreams even into the
later barren years, were derived from the deposed and ex
communicated prince, the enemy of the Church, the Antichrist,
the fallen angel.
Old prophecies had given Frederick 267 years to live, and
267 years after his death the Reformation dawned in Germany.
Two years later, in the chapbook of 1519, Frederick II was for
the first time confused with his grandfather Barbarossa. It
gradually became superfluous to picture the long-hoped for
Saviour-Emperor as persecutor of the Church. And almost
no one in Germany had had an Italian eye for Frederick II
Antichrist as Herakles Musagetes. Frederick II is gradually
metamorphosed into the bearded Barbarossa, the immortal boy
into the aged man. Germany's dream was changed, and change
of myth reflects the changing life and longings of a people.
The snow-white sleeper whose beard has grown through the
table on which his elbow rests has no message for the German
of to-day : he has had his fulfilment, in the greatest vassal of
the Empire, the aged Bismarck. The weary Lord of the Last
Day has naught to say to the fiery Lord of the Beginning, the
A SIBYLLINE SAYING 689
seducer, the deceiver, the radiant, the merry, the ever-young,
the stern and mighty judge, the scholar, the sage who leads his
armed warriors to the Muses' dance and song, he who slumbers
not nor sleeps but ponders how he can renew the "Empire."
The mountain would to-day stand empty were it not for the
son of Barbarossa's son. The greatest Frederick is not yet
redeemed, him his people knew not and sufficed not. " Lives
and lives not," the Sibyl's word is not for the Emperor, but for
the German People.
FINIS
INDEX
[v. also Table of Contents]
Abacus, 342
Abbasids, 192
Abelard, 82
Abruzzi, 116, 204, 206, 285
strongholds, 479
Absalom, 447
Absolutism, Chap. V passim, 473 ff.,
486 ff .
Abu Zacharia Yahya, 287 f.
Academy, of F., 345
Acerno, 145
Acerra, Count of, t;. Diepold of
Schweinspeunt
Achilles, 16, 469
Acquaviva family, 314, 316, 492
Acre, 139, 182, 183, 187, 205, 682
Adam, 258, 395
age of, 523
Adam of Cremona, 357
Adda R., 149
Adelasia of Sardinia, wife of King
Enzio, 470, 670
Adige R., 58, 431
Adimari tower, 650
Admirals, v. William Porcus, Henry
of Malta, Nicholas Spinola,
Ansaldus de Mari, Peter of
Gae"ta
Adolf of Nassau, 410
Adolf, Abp. of Cologne, 18
Adolf us of Holstein, 204
Adonis, 306
Adriatic Sea, 153, 554
Advocatus, Advocate [Vogt] of
Rome, 399,47*, 5&3
Aegean Sea, 125
Aeneas, 337
Africa, 52, 128, 129, 287 ; v. also
Egypt
Age(s), Three ages of world, 160 f.,
335, 395
Aghlabites, 128
Agnes of Bohemia, 375
Agriculture, of Cistercians, 83 ff.
F. and, 286
Aiguesmortes, 663
Aimeric of Peguilain, 61
Aix la Chapelle [Aachen], 63, 72,
202, 419
coronation at, 443
Ajello, 116
Count of, 116
Al Abbas, 192
Alaman da Costa, 123, 141
Alaric, King of the W. Goths, 20
Alba, 452, 640
Albenga, 460
Alberigo of Romano, 388, 471, 613,
646
Albert, Patriarch of Antioch, 390,
591
Albert of Austria, 410
Albert of Bohemia, 619
Albert of Halberstadt, 81
Albert, Abp. of Magdeburg, 176
Albert, Duke of Saxony, 204, 679
Albertus Magnus, 3 40, 363 f., 415
Albigensian(s), war, 40
heresy, 161
Albumazar, 355
Alchemy, 354, 510
Alessandria, 461
and Pallavicini, 614
Alexander of Aphrodisias, 348
Alexander III, Pope, 42, 229
Alexander the Great, 61, 160, 197,
207, 344» 357, 409, 427, 494,
609
legends of, 337
and elephants, 464
Alexandria, 123, 288
Alexius III, Byzantine Emp., 9
Al Farabi, 338
Al Fargani, 344, 355
Alfonso I of Aragon, 530
Alfonso VIII of Castile, 90
691
692
INDEX
Alfonso of Castile, King of the
Romans, 687
Alfonso, Count of Provence, 34 f.
Al Hanifi, 342
Al Kamil, Sultan of Egypt, 183-192,
195, 288, 341 f.
son of, 682
Alkamo, 324
Al Kindi, 338
Allemania, 554
Almagest, 355
Amaury of Lusignan, King of Cy
prus, 10, 179
Almohades, 9, 287, 348
Al Muazzam, Sultan of Damascus,
183, 184
Alpetragius, 339
Alpetronius, 344
Alpheus, 21
Alpine Passes, 388, 415 f., 430 f., 475
closure of, 156, 372, 393
Alsace, 60, 65, 89, 415
Altavilla, 634
Amadeus of Savoy, 639
Amalfi, 122
Amelia, 487
Amidei family, 68
Anagni, 169, 170, 210, 399, 467,
57.6 f.
Analytica of Aristotle, 339
" Ananke," 334
Anatomy, 356 f.
Ancona [the March], 5, 8, 47, 138,
153, 486
Vicariate General, 487
betrays Barharossa, 649
Andalusian horses, 404
Andernach, 72
Andrew of Cicala, 477, 630, 633 f.
Angel-Pope, v. Papa angelicus
Angelo Malabranca, 460
Angelus, 442
Angevin(s), massacre of, 292
court of, 312, 318
Anjou(s), in Sicily, 323 f., 362
and Manfred, 674
and Saracens, 676
v. also Vespers, Sicilian
Ansaldus de Mari, Admiral, 545, 579
Anselm of Justingen, 53
Anthony of Padua, v. St. Anthony
Antichrist, 160, 198
expectation of, 396 f .
F. as, 499, 515
Rainer's pamphlets, 592 f.
predicted for 1261, 603
Chap. IX, passim
Antioch, 341
Antiochus, 464
Apennines, 509, 627, 641, 645, 656 ;
v. also La Cisa
Apocalypse, 395, 495, 498, 609, and
Chap. IX passim
Apollo, 3, 139, 202, 340, 396, 687
Apothecaries, 357
Apuleius, 337
Apulia(ns),5o,si, no, 121,204,220
architecture, 86
agriculture, 85
plantation of Saracens, 129
fairs, 285
F/s love of, 321
in Italy as officials, 491 f.
v. also Puer Apuliae
Aquila, arsenal, 281
Aquila, ship, 125
Aquila, town, 654
Aquileia, 376, 403
patriarch of, 598
Aquinas, v. Thomas
Aquino family, 115, 313, 316, 492
as poets, 330 f.
Arab(s), 291
literature, 338 f.
learning, 338 ft.
astrology, 355
troops, 464
numerals, 158, 341
poets, 185
Arabia, 196, 361
Aragon, 8, 31, 271
knights of, 32, 34 f.
court of, 312, 330
and Papacy, 566 f.
Aratus, 355
Arbia, 66 1
Arch, of Constantine, 452
of Titus, 452
of Trajan, 530
Archer, constellation, 355
Archer(s),428,43o,436 ; v. also Army
Architecture, German-Roman-An
tique, 81 f.
of Cistercians, 86
of Sicilian fortresses, 120 f.
Prussian, 120
Arab, 192
Renaissance, 322
Gothic, 322
Corinthian, 322
INDEX
693
Archpoet, 425, 444
Archpriest of Greek Church, 143
Arcole, 431
Arctic, 361
Arduin, Bp. of Cefalu, 141
Ar elate, the, 641
Arethusa, 21
Arezzo, 105
and poetry, 331
and Florence, 679
Argentum vivum, 354
Ariosto, 189
Aristotelianism, 254
Aristotle, 248, 298, 337 f., 344, 357
as scientist, 362
Ark of the Covenant, 146, 595
Aries, 68 1
Army, F.'s in general, 427 f.
agt. Babenberg, 428
first Lombard campaign, 434
second Lombard campaign, 463 f.
cost of, 540
agt. Viterbo, 585
Italian for Germany, 641
before walls of Parma, 644
after battle of Parma, 657
Arnaldus, Master, 298
Arno R., 52, 317, 667
Arnold, v. Brother Arnold
Arnsberg, Count of, 401
Arrigo Testa, 332, 643
Art, in Sicily, 526 f.
ancient, 529
and Church, 534 f.
plastic, 81 f ., i I i , 336, 363 ,409, 509
German, 408 f.
Art of War, 277, 427
Arthur, King, 409
Ashtaroth, 657
Asia, 627
Asia Minor, 348 ; v. also Nicaea
Assassins [Hashishin], 193, 388
Assisi, 6, 509 ; v. also St. Francis
Asti, 57
Astrolabe, 342
Astrologers, Astrology, 167, 197,
342 f., 355
and Victoria, 654
Astronomers, Astronomy, 192, 336,
355, 415
Athens, 283
Atina, 114
Attila, 605
Augsburg, 65, 78, 104, 378, 416, 433
Bp. of, 402, 621
Augusta, town of, 280, 654
Augustales, gold coins, 225 flf., 285,
507> 531, 54i
as likeness, 366, 529
Augustus, 220, 223, 224 ff., 335
and Vergil, 447
»>. also Caesar
Austria, 379, 384, 432
and Confederation of Passau,
619 f.
Auvergne, 326
Averroes, 248, 338, 340, 344, 415,
647
Aversa, 51, 145
fortress, 116
Avicenna, 248, 338, 340, 349
Avignon, 473, 589, 68 1
Ayyubids, 183
Azzo of Este, 471, 474
Baal, 615
Babenberg, 384, 428, 432
Gertrude of, 596
v. also Frederick of Babenberg
Babylon(ian), 354 f., 520
Baden, Margrave of, 401
Baghdad, 341
Bagnacavallo, Counts of, 679
Baldwin II, of Flanders, Emp. of
Constantinople, 556, 585
Bale, v. Basel
Balearic Is., 9
Baltic Sea, 91, 380, 412
Bamberg, 35, 7 8
architecture, 81 f., 662
Bp. of, 635
Ban, of Empire, 109, 157, 428, 474
Baptistery, in Florence, 650
Barbarasi, 681
Barbarossa, Frederick, Emp., grand
father of F., 8, 40, 133, 371
diplomacy of, 6, 20
and Roman Law, 12, 109, 222,
228, 236
pride of race, 64
homage to Charlemagne, 72
and Teutonic Order, 90, 93
and Lombards, 147, 149, 461
as Crusader, 167 f.
appearance, 367
sword-investiture, 409
and Archpoet, 425, 444
and Romans, 442, 451, 453
contrast with F.,, 453
and fellow kings, 563 f.
694
INDEX
Barbarossa, theories of Empire, 573
myths, 688
Barbary horses, 358, 404
Bad, 51, 145, 160
castle, 479
Barlaam, 305
Barletta, 51, 206, 322, 476
diet, 176
Barnacle geese, 361
Bartholomew, Dominican, 455
Bartholomew of Foggia, 535
Bartholomew Pignatellus, Professor
at Naples, 298
Basel, 59,95,416
Basilicata, the, 51, 285
Baths of Constantine, 558
Batu, son of Chingiz Khan, 552
Bavaria, 619
Duke of, 58, 428
Beatrice of Burgundy, wife of Bar
barossa, 8, 78, 407
Beatrice, dau, of Philip of Swabia,
wife of Otto IV, 47, 64
Beatrice, dau. of Manfred, 675
Beatrice, wife of Roger II, 4
Beelzebub , 657
Bela IV, King of Hungary, 424, 462
troops, 464
and Mongols, 553
Belluno, 659
Belshazzar, 594
Benevento, 279
battle of, 327, 674
wiped out, 483, 547
v. Roffredo
Berard of Acquaviva, 317
Berard of Castacca, Abp. of Palermo,
58, 71, 143 f., 179, 183, 296,
,297,372,470, 476
discovers P. d. V., 299
head of Sic. Church, 481
ambassador to Innocent IV, 583
at F.'s deathbed, 683 f.
Berard, Abp. of Messina, 297
Berceto, 645
Bereshith, 414
Bergamo, 431, 434
Bernard of Clairvaux, v. St. Bernard
Bernardo Orlando di Rossi, 465, 579
treachery of, 628 f .
takes Parma, 643
in Florence, 649
death, 658
Berthold of Hohenburg, 317,319, 345
at F.'s deathbed, 683
Berthold of Ratisbon, 404
Berthold of Tannenrode, 89
Besancon, Abp. of, 549
Bethlehem, 187, 512, 572
Bethshemesh, 594
Bianca Lancia, 639
Bible, 201 f., 230, 345, 348, 395, 512
imagery, 220, Chap. IX passim
Birthday, Emperor's, 227
Bismarck, 67, 688
Black Art, Black Magic, v. Sorcery
Black Thursday, 680
Blasphemers, 121
Blood-letting, 323, 343
Blood sacrifices, 414
Blucher, 580
Boccaccio, 67, 306, 573
Boethius, 337, 339, 355
Bohemia, 62, 384, 428, 553
and Confederation of Passau, 619
King of, 59, 415
Bohemund of Antioch, 10
Bohemund of Tarentum, 167
Bojano, 116
Bologna, as seat of learning, 39, 105,
109, 228, 253, 305
University of, 133, 297, 298
Charter of, 345
imprisons Enzio, 327, 670 f.
F.'s gift to, 346
and penance, 397
defies F., 461
F.'s campaign agt., 474
and League, 539
Bonagiunta di Lucca, 333
Boniface VIII, 39, 247, 441, 674
Boniface, Marquis of Montferrat,
649
Book of All Knowledge, 350
Book of Indian Sages, 344
Book of Laws, v. Liber Augustalis
Book of the Nine Judges, 342
Boppard, 401
Bordeaux, 682
Borgia family, 457, 494, v. also
Cesare
Borgo san Donnino, 656, 657, 667
Bosporus, 442
Botany, 336, 354
Bourbons, 569
Bouvines, battle of, 68 f., 562
Bozen, 104
Brabant, Duke of, 68, 72 ,
Brahmins, 349
Breeding, of animals, 358
INDEX
695
Breisach, 59
Bremen, Abp. of, 631
Brenner Pass, 58, 104, 416, 475, 641
closure of, 156 f.
and Eccelino, 612, 680
Brescello, fort, 646, 655
Brescia, 430, 435, 461
siege of, 464 f., 541
and Enzio, 643 f.
Breton lineage, 314
Brindisi, harbour of, 122
marriage of Isabella, 139
election of bp., 145
port for Crusades, 168 f., 176 f.
F.'s return, 206
and plague, 419, 499
Britain, 361
Brixen, Bp. of, 630 f.
Brother Arnold, 618
Brother Elias of Cortona, Minister
General of Franciscans, 465,
509 f.
Brother Gerard, 397 f.
Brother John, v, John of Vicenza
Brother Jordan, 510
Brothers Minor, v. Franciscans
Brunetto Latini, 311, 354, 445
Brunswick, 65, 412
Brunswick-Llineburg, 412
Brutus, 664
Bugno, 655, 658, 670
Building, Apulian fortresses, izof.
Cistercian monasteries, 86 f.
Brother Elias, 509
of Cologne Cathedral, 620
of Victoria, 654 f.
v. also Architecture
Bulgaria, 361
Buondelmonti, family, 68
Bureaucracy, 133
in Sicily, 272 ff ., 293 ff., 477 fl.
in Germany, 379 f*
in Italy, 489 f .
in Teutonic Order, 273
Burgundy, 8, 62, 379
troops from, 388, 391, 463
Vicar iate, 487
Kingdom, 642
Burzen, 92
Busseto, 614
Buzzard, 359
Byzantine, Byzantium : Henry VI
and, 9
Crusaders' conquest of, 40
trade, 149
silk monopoly, 283
Liutprand in, 336
learning, 339
strategy, 427
rivalry of Rome, 442
court diction, 521
Caesar(s), cult by F., 303 fl., 443 ff.,
507 f.
parallels, 425 f., 434
connotations of, 446
in general, Chap, VII passim
Caesar, Julius, 155, 202, 223, 227 ff.
cheerfulness, 327
campaigns, 427
and Pompey, 447
Caesarea, 117, 187, 654
Caesarean precedents and titles, 438,
441 ff., Chap. VII passim
Caesarius of Heisterbach, 8, 85
Cairo, slave market, 129
crusaders, 136
schools, 1 86
court, 331
Cajazzo, 115, 116
Calabria, 51, 53, 121, 285
Greek language, 305
Calamandrinus, 464 f.
Calatrava, 86
Order of, 90
Calendar, 355
Cambrai, 95
Camels, 358, 404
Caniino, 432
Campagna, the, 8, 389, 399
Campanella, 245
Campania, in, 115, 255, 285
Cancer, constellation, 655
Canonisation, St. Francis, 161
Charlemagne, 167
St. Dominic, 394
St. Elizabeth, 419 f.
Canon Law, 229, 296
and Innocent IV, 622" f.
v, also Decretals
Canopus, 356
Canosa, 310
Canossa, 149, 599
Canterbury, Abp. of, 340
Capaccio, 634
Capet(s), 386
Capitanata, the, m, 285
F.'s hq., 321
Capitol, the, 175, 442, 45°, 45*>
6?5 f-
696
INDEX
Capizzi, 280
Capraio, fortress, 626
Capua, strategic importance, 114,
H5
diet of, 115, 118, 140
loyalty to F., 204, 206
law courts, 278
andP.d.V., 299
bridge at, 301, 366
Capuan Assizes, 121, 124
Capuan Gate, 450 f., 530 f., 669
Caraccioli, family, 314, 316, 492
Cardinals, divisions amongst, 208
law studies, 229
and Gregory IX, 398 f.
allies of F., 457 f.
and F.'s council, 542
conclaves, 574 f., 578
oath of, 586
THE CARDINAL, v. Ottaviano
Caretto, Margrave of, 545, 639
Carinola, Bp. of, 141
Carinthia, Duke of, 315
Carolingians, 441
Carroccio, as pulpit, 398
of Milan, 436 f.
sent to Rome, 448 f., 450
of Cremona, 657, 680
Carthage, 207, 426
Caserta, 479
Caserta, family, 314, 316 ; v. also
Richard and Conradin
Cassiodorus, 299, 447
Castel Florentine, 683, 684
Castel del Monte, 322, 529, 548, 676
Castel dell1 Ovo, 675
Castellamare, 22, 52
Castile, 8, 271
troops, 464
Castles, annexation of, 116 ff., 281
of Capitanata, 321
plan of, 322 f .
and Lombard war, 479
adornment of, 529 f.
Catania, 34, 51, 138
Categorica, 339
Catiline, 155
Cato, 223
Cavalry, 436 ; v. also Army
Cefalu, 684
Celano, 116, 117
exiles of, 130
Celestine III, 10, n
Celestine IV., 576
Cencio Savelli, v. Honorius III
Centiloquium of Hermes, 342
Centaur, constellation, 355
Centorbi, 280
Ceperano, Peace of, 209 f., 374
Cephalonia, 179
Ceremonial, Sicilian coronation, 15
collauding, 56
coronation in Aix, 72
in Rome, 107 f.
in Jerusalem, 199
of law courts, 236
wedding, 406 f.
at court, 513, 527 f.
on Capuan Gate, 532
Ceres, 21
Cerro, castle, 479
Cesar e Borgia, 612
Ceuta, v. Ibn Sabin
Chadar, 193
Chalcidius, 339-
Chambe'ry, 642
Chariot, standard-bearing, v. Car
roccio
Charlemagne [Charles the Great]
throne at Aix, 72
wars agt. Jheathen, 93
canonisation, 167
heir of David, 201
wealth, 289
F. as heir of, 371
legends of, 403
re-interment of, 419
and Empire, 230, 429, 543
as warrior, 628
Charles II of Anjou, 328
Charles V, 125, 217, 563
Chartres, 82
Charybdis, 21, 337
Cherub, 199, 202, 203, 250 ; v. also
Seraph
Children's Crusade, 59 f., 71, 129
Chingiz Khan, 197, 309, 551 f.
Chioggia, 377
Chivalry, of Mussulmans, 189
of F.'s court, 314, 320, 323 fl., 334
in Germany, 409
Christ, prophecies concerning, 3
Jerusalem manifesto, 201 f.
F. and, 228 ff., 250 f.
age of, 395, 523
Chap. IX passim
Christmas, Frederick's birth, 5
in Pisa, 511 f.
Chur [Coire], 58
Bp. of, 58, 59, 621
INDEX
697
Church, v. Table of Contents and
various Popes
Cicala, family, xi5> 3*4
Cicero, 300, 302, 337
Cilicia, King of, 10
Cingoli, 679
Cisa Pass, v. La Cisa
Cistercians, organisation of, 83 ff.
F. and, 85 f.
Spanish, 86
as farmers, 286
and Fridericus Cornutus, 609
F. as, 85, 684
t>. also Agriculture, Architecture
Citeaux, 84
Abt. of, 549
Cittanuova, 658
Cividale, 378, 379, 400
Civita Castellana, 588, 589
Civitavecchia, 548, 589
Ciairvaux, Abt. of, 549
Claudius, Emp., 450
Cluny, Abt. of, 549
Coblenz, 68
Cockatoos, 358
Coinage, silver " imperials ," 127
Augustales, 22 $ f.
leather, 541,
Victorines, 654 f.
change of, 484, 659
v. also Augustales
Colbert,, 387
Cologne, 59» 7* , , f e
and Isabella of England, 406 f.
Albertus' garden, 415
Abp. of, 620
Colonna, family, 452, 558
Omni feud, 576
Colorno, 655
Colosseum, 452
Comacchio, 377
Comedy, topical, 305
Comnenus, 442
Como, 65, 475, 679
hostages, 652
Conca d'Oro, 27
Conclave, of Terror, 574 fl.
at Anagni, 578
Concordat, of Constance and Pope,
confirmed by F., 55
Condottieri, 427
Conrad III, Emp,, 167, 442
and Romans, 453
Conrad IV, King of Jerusalem, son
of F. and Isabella of Jerusalem,
20, 195, 342
birth, 140
and Cremona, 150
education, 319
at six, 399
at seven, 403
heir, 406
King of the Romans, 433 f.
Lombard wars, 463 f.
and Mongols, 553
sixth Emp., 572
F.'s letters, 587
Diet of Verona, 596
and Henry Raspe, 637
F/s visit, 641, 679
death, 673 f.
and brother Henry, 673
and Wm. of Holland, 68 1
Conrad of Antioch, 676
Conrad, Bp. of Hildesheim, Chan
cellor, 20, 81, 337
Conrad of Hochstaden, Abp. of
Cologne, 620 f.
Conrad of Hohenlohe, 179, 401
Conrad of Marburg, Inquisitor,
400 f., 419
Conrad of Masovia, Duke of Poland,
92
Conrad, Abp. of Metz, 104
Conrad of Solimburg, 672
Conrad of Thuringia, Landgrave,
Grandmaster of the Teutonic
Order, 420, 536
Conradin, King of Sicily, son of
Conrad IV, 216, 328, 675 f.
Conradin, natural son of Conrad IV,
676
Conradin of Caserta, 676
Consilarii, 278, 295
Conspiracy, of Parma, 628
of intimates, 632 f.
Lyons the centre of, 635
Constance, town, 58, 63, 403
peace of, 147
lake of, 65
Bp. of, 621
Constance, dau. of Roger II, King
of Sicily, wife of Henry VI,
consort of Henry, 4-6
jealousy for son, n
Queen in Sic,, 13-17
plans for son, 22 f., 35
F.'s worship of, 408, 512, 572
tomb, 684
INDEX
and FaSnza, 547
v. also Concordat
Constance of Aragon, wife of Fre
derick II, Emp., 32, 53, 99> *°4
crowned Empress, 107 f.
death, 138
tomb in Palermo, 529
Constantine, original name of F., 6,
ii
Constantine, Emp,, 9, 335, 429 > 442>
453
v, also Donation of
Constantinople, 339, 556
patriarch of, 71, 143
Constitutions of Melfi, v. Liber
Augustalis
Consulates, consuls, 288
Contempt of court, 276
Conti, family, 163
Convivio, of Dante, 346
Conza, 145
Corfu, 179
Corinth, 283
Corn, Sicilian, 126, 158, 286
trade in, 484 f .
Cornelii, 454
Corneto, 487, 546
Cornutus, 609
Cornwall, v. Richard
Coronation, in Sic., 15
in Mainz, 63
in Aix, 72
in Rome, 107 f.
in Jerusalem, 198 f.
Corsica, 122
Cortenuova, 436 f., 475, 486
consequences of, 443, 444, 445 >
457
spolia opima, 448
doge's son, 467, 542
Cortopasso, 656
Cortona, 509
Cosenza, 405
Abp. of, 674 f.
Cosmos, 249, 335, 355
Council, Church, Pope and, 497
Lateran, 70, 597
Lyons, 590, 597 f.
Lyons and German Church, 621
F.'s General Council suggested,
Gregory IX's, 543 f.
Counsellors, 278, 295, 640
Court(s), at Foggia, 308, 314 ff.
law courts, 229 fT. ; v. also Justitia
contempt of, 276
of Exchequer, 484
v, also Diets
Cranes, 358
Crema, 149, 150
and Pallavicini, 614
Cremona, welcome to Puer Apuliae,
57, 58
abortive diet of, 147
and Milan, 148 f.
charter, 149
loyalty, 149-54, i59> *74
administration, 282
triumph, 311, 366
and Lombard war, 430 fl., 644
diet, 431
diet of 1247, 641
and Pallavicini, 614
F.'s promises to, 626
loss of carrocdio, 657
P, d.V.'s treachery, 663 f.
avenged, 680
Crete, 123, 179, 554
Crevalcore, 474
Critique of Pure Reason, 228
Crown Property, in Sicily, 35. "i f->
286 ; v. also Demanium
Crown Prosecution, 240
Crusade(s), Children's, 59 f., 71
under Henry VI, n f., 15, 93
Honorius III, 97, 136
first and second, 167
F.'s, Chap. IV passim, 390
in general, 442
agt. Tartars, 553
Gregory IX and, 556 f.
agt. F., 621 f.
St. Louis', 663, 681
Cult, of " Divine Mother," 408, 512,
5721
of Caesars, Chap. VII passim
of Emp., 519 ff.
of Justitia, 229 fF.
Customs, 283 f.
Cyprus, 179 fl., 317, 3^9 f-» 554
Dacia, 554
Daedalus, 21
Dalmatian pirates, 388
Damascus, 184, 388, 557 i
al Muazzam, Sultan
Damietta, 97, 141
disaster, 136, 173
Damon, 329
Daniel, 395
. also
INDEX
Dante, as Ghibelline, 67, 142, 509,
533, 534
mental background, 248
world monarchy, 255 f., 507
pupil of Brunetto Latini, 311
and Vergil, 335, 6u
and astrology, 342
enquiring mind, 352 f., 365
his vision, 456 f.
as reconciler, 6n
spiritual communion, 617
as fugitive, 650
works : de Monarchia, 247, 255,
346, 668
Divina Commedia, 259, 646, 668
Convivio, 346
de Aqua et terra, 353
de Vulgari eloquentia, 324, 353
poems, 333
views : on Empress Constance, 5
on Henry VI, 14, 39
on St. Bernard, 83
on St. Francis, 161
on Saladin, 189
on Justinian, 223
on State, 227, 249
on Decretals, 229, 238
on Roman Empire, 242
on F., 260, 267
on F. and Manfred, 328 f.
on Emp. and Pope, 271, 392,
393, 562, 563
on P.d. V., 298, 304
on Sicilian literature, 324
on Sicilian language, 325 f.
quotation from Reginald of
Aquino, 330
on " the Notary, " 333
on Michael Scot, 340
on human speech, 353
on Maid Italia, 494
on Guido Guerra, 540
on Eccelino, 612
on ideal Church, 616 f.
on *' the Cardinal," 646
on Farinata, 650
on Manfred, 674 f.
Danube, 404
Date groves, 286
Dauphin, 642
Day of Judgment, v. End of World
David, Puer Apuliae as, 61, 403
F. identified with, 201, 215, 443
and Saul, 433
and Absalom, 447
699
Jews and, 551
house of, 611
De Anima, 340
De Arte venandi cum avibus, 359 ;
v. also Falcon Book
De Caelo, 340
De Monarchia, 247, 255, 346, 668
De Porno, 341
De resignandis privileges, 112 ; v.
Law of Privileges
Decretals, 42, 229, 298, 411
Innocent IV. commentary, 579
v, also Canon Law
Defender of the Faith, 263
Demanium, 35, 112, 286
Denmark, 8, 91
King of, 70
Devil- Worshippers, v. Luciferians
Diepold of Schweinspeunt, Count of
Acerra, 24, 48, 50, 116
Diet, Capua, 115, 121, 140
Messina, 121
Cremona, 147, 151, 157, 158, 297 J
not held, 431 (1247), 641
Barletta, 176
Friuli, 195, 378 f.
Ravenna, 372 fl.
Worms, 374 f.
Frankfurt, 401
Mainz, 409
Piacenza, 423
Vicenza, 432
Pavia, 460
Turin, 460, 486
Foggia, 536
Esslingen, 553
Verona, 588, 591, 596
Chambe*ry, 642
Vercelli, 663
Dietrich of Bern, 663, 687
apparition of, 13
cycle of, 80 f.
Dieu d'Amour, castle, 181
Diocletian, baths of, 107
Diogenes, 160
Dionysius of Syracuse, 282
Dioscorides, 354
Discipline, 359
Dissection, 356
Divina Commedia, 259, 646, 668
Divination, 338
Doctor angelicus, 297
Doctor mellifluus, 83
Dominicus Gundissalinus, 157, 338
Dominicus, Master, same ?, 341
700
INDEX
Domitius, 155
Donatello, 662
" Donation of Constantine," 429,
441,504
Doria, family, 545
Dorians, 385
Dorotheas, 355
" Dragon," F.'s horse, 366, 609
Drawings, in Falcon Book, 362
Dromedaries, 404
Dvina R., 91
Dye monopoly, 269
Eagle, bird, 359
Eagles, Hohenstaufen, 125, 649
Roman, 225, 682
imperial, 427, 434, 438, 55°
East Indies, 288
Eboli, family, 115, 3*4, 492*, v.
Peter of
Ebrach, 83
Eccelino of Romano, 612 f.
temper of, 309
F.'s alliance with, 393
Pope and, 394
and penance, 398
and Lombard War, 430 ff.
marriage, 471
governing, 492, 639
at diet of Verona, 596
conspiracy agt. F., 633 f.
before Parma, 644 f ,
letters to, 678
and Brenner, 680
Egeno of Urach, 77
Eger, Golden Bull of, 70
Egg experiments, 358
Egypt, 97, 136, 157, 196, 288, 348,
557
court of, 331
and Napoleon, 191, 627
v. aho Cairo and al Kamil
Eider R., 158
Eisenach, 419
Elba, 548
Elbe R., 91
Elements of Astronomy, al Fargani,
344
Elements of Euclid, 339
Ellwangen, Abt. of, 621
Elijah, 615
Elisha, 373
Elizabeth of Bavaria, wife of Conrad
IV, 637, 675
Elizabeth of Hungary, v, St. Eliza
beth
Empire, Henry VFs theories of, 6 ff.
Hohenstaufen theories of, 8
F.'s self-dedication to, 73 f., 79 ff.
F. emulates the Roman, 222 ff.
F.'s theories of, 424 f., 561 f.
F.'s dream of renovatio, 443 ff.
Ideal relation between Papacy
and, 390
Dante on Roman, 242
Dantexm papacy and, 271, 392 f.,
562 f.
Theory of German, 385 ff.
Status in Europe, 561
Empresses of F., 334, 407 f., 593 ;
v. also Constance of Aragon,
Isabella of Jerusalem, Isabella
of England
Encyclopaedia
of Michael Scot, 342, 354
of Juda ben Salomon Cohen, 344
etymological, 298
of Isidore of Seville, 336
End of the World, 224 ff., 396 f.,
423 > 444, 495, 506 ff., 522 ;
Chap. IX passim
Eneide, poem, 81
Engadine, 58
Engelbert, Abp. of Cologne, 103,
158, 373
England, English : traits of, 65, 406
and fifth Crusade, 168
in Syria, 182
and Welfs, 406
and Lombard War, 423
and Cardinals, 458
troops, 464
and Papacy, 497, 566 f., 598
and Gregory's council, 544 f.
and Crusades, 557
and Council of Lyons, 597
and Innocent IV, 623, 682
Enzio, King of Sardinia, natural son
of F., as page, 318
cheerfulness, 327 ff.
in prison, 331, 670 f.
and Persian falcon book, 363
knighting of, 469 f .
marriage, 470
Legate General, 490
and Govt. of Italy, 492 f.
invades Papal provinces, 511
in Tuscany, 541 , 548
and captured prelates, 549
INDEX
701
Enzio, and conspiracy agt. F., 632 f.
rules central Lombardy, 639
King of Lunigiana, 640
calls for help, 643
before Parma, 644 f.
remarriage, 670
fate of his house, 677
attempted escape and death, 677
family, 678
Epicureans, in Dante, 260, 267, 646
Epidaurus, 9
Episcopal elections, 17, 33 f., 41,
141 fl., 154
Erigena, 82
Ernest of Swabia, 60
epic of Duke Ernest, 81
Erythraean Sibyl, 339
Esslingen, 553
Este family, 493
Este, Margrave of, 57
Esthonia, 91
Ethico, 67
Ethiopians, 404
Etna, 21, 354> 686
Etymological Encyclopaedia, 298
Euclid, 339, 344
Eugene of Palermo, 339
Eunuchs, 310 f., 407, 655, 657
Exchequer, Court of, 484
Excommunication of F., 173
ban lifted, 209
second, 472
weakened effect of, 537
Execution of Justice, 421, 426, 495
Experiments, 352 f., 358
Fabii, 454
Fa&iza, 157, 363, 461, 539 f-
Fairs, 127, 285
Fakhru'd Din, 183, 185, 189, 192,
206, 237, 682
Falcon Book, 319, 356 f., 359 ff.
Falconer(s), 359, 363
the perfect, 316
Falcons, 359 f., v. also Hawking
Fall, the, 241 ft., 352
Familiares, v. Household officers
Famine, in Rome, 158
in Parma, 648 f.
Farinata degli Uberti, 650
Faro R,, 5* >358
Feirefiss, 189 and footnote
Feltre, 659
Ferentino, 137
Ferrara, 398,432
fall of, 539
and Parma, 645, 658
Feudal System
in Germany, 109 f., 379
in Sicily, 118 ff., 222, 540
F.'s dislike of, 118
armies under, 427
Fieschi family, 579
Filangieri family, 314, 316, 492
Filippo, 677
Fiorentino, Castel, 683 f.
Firdausi, 189
Flagella, arsenal, 281
Flagellants, 398, 595, 688
Fleet, Sicilian, i24ff., 545, 546
Imperial, 545 f., 561, 649, 681
Genoese, 545
Pisan, 546
on Po, 658
Florence, 152
and poetry, 331
agreement with F., 460, 541
and Faenza, 548
and Orlando di Rossi, 628
prophecy about, 641, 684
and Cardinal Ottaviano, 646 f.
deserts F., 650
Foggia, 116, 130, 372
F.'s capital, 321 ft.
zoo at, 358 f.
diet, 536
and Ottaviano, 674
F.'s last stay, 683
Folco Ruffo, 331, 683
Foligno, 6, n, 13, 512, 513
Fondaco, 122, 283 f.
Fondi, 452
Fontevivo, monastery of, 628
Fonl, 541
Forlimpopo, 541
Fortresses, see Castles
Fortuna Augusti, Fortuna Caesarea :
448, 642, 657, 659, 670
Fossalta, 670, 678
Fra EHa, v. Brother Elias
Fra Gerardo, t;. Brother Gerard
Fra Leo of Bologna, v. Brother Leo
Fra Pacifico, 324
Fra Salimbene, 397, 628, 648
France, French : ally of F., 63, 68 f.
and statecraft, 271, 386
troops, 464
and Gregory IX, 543
and Gregory's Council, 544
702
INDEX
France and Papacy, 566 f.
and Council of Lyons, 597
and Innocent IV., 623
v. also Philip II, Louis IX and
Napoleon
Francis, v. St. Francis
Francis of Baden, 675
Franciscans [Brothers, Minor , Mino
rites], democratic flavour of,
154
rule of, 161
hostility to F. in Syria, 182
rivalry with Dominicans, 394
attitude to F., 506 f.
and Ghibellines, 509
and Brother Elias, 509, 510
as reformers, 616 f.
v. also Saint Francis
Frank(s), 216 f., 385
Frankfurt, n, 53, 63, 100, 102
Frederick II, of Aragon and Sicily,
328
Frederick II of Austria, Babenberg,
" the Fighter," " the Quarrel
some," " the Valiant," 384, 428
Frederick of Castile, 318
Frederick Lancia, 676
Frederick II of Prussia, 359
Frederick, Duke of Swabia, Hohen-
staufen, 116
Frederick impostors, 404, 686
Frederick n, Hohenstaufen, Em
peror, 1194-1250 :
ZV.B. — For external events of his
history v. Table of Contents
appearance, 55, 60 f., 105, 191,
226, 366
on Capuan Gate, 531
charm and personality, 29 f., 102,
105, 185, 217, 307 f-, 368,
384,403
cheerfulness, 326 fT., 366
children :
sons — Henry VII
Henry (secundus)
Conrad IV
natural sons :
Enzio
Frederick of Antioch
Manfred
Richard of Theate
dau. m. Margrave of Meissen
natural daus. :
Selvaggia, m. Eccelino
another m. John Vatatzes
a third m. Richard of
Caserta
a fourth m. Jacob of
Caretto
a fifth m. Thomas of
Aquino the Younger
cynicism, 220, 308 fT., 582, 606 f.
dignity, 27, 64, 307, 608 f., 684
hate for rebels, heretics and priests,
150, 153, I59» 263 ff-> 269 f.,
422 f ., 564 f.
of Milan, 422, 460 f.
of Viterbo, 352, 586 f.
human relations, to mother, 408,
512, 572
to wives, 407 f. ; v. Empresses
to sons, 408
Conrad, 195
Manfred, Enzio, 318, 469,
490
to first-born, 447 f.
to intimates, 307, 632
Muslims in East, v. al Kamil,
Fakhru'd Din
to pages, 314 f .
toP.d.V., 241, 299, 303, 447,
629
to Saracen guard, 131
to scholars, v. Love of know
ledge
to subordinates, 629 f.
to women, 310, 334 ; v. Harem
liberality, 61 f., 109
love of art, 528 ff .
of knowledge, 28 ff,, 157 f.,
185, 192, 196, 247 f., 307,
334 f., 343 ff-, 414 f-> 669
of ostentation, 311, 404
of poetry, 328 f.
of Sicily, 220 f., 536 f,
of sport, 315 f., 359 f., 508,
656 f.
luck and happy touch, 53 ff.,
57 ff., 60, 95, 1 01, 112
and providence, 106, 206, 217,
251 f., 422
pride of birth and race, 73, 193,
196, 319 f., 346, 350, 419 f.,
57i
savagery, 129, 556, 625 f., 634,
65 1 £.,654, 667
scientific spirit and freedom of
thought, 197, 218, 226, 251,
309, 343, 349, 352 f.; 356,
364, 610
INDEX
7°3
Frederick II, Hohenstaufen
theories of empire, 424, 561 f.,
Chap. VII passim
theories of immediacy, son-of-
Godship, etc., 203 ff., 218,
Chap. V passim, 501 ff.,
519 ff.
tolerance, 190 f., 267 ff.
Frederick of Antioch, natural son of
F., King of Tuscany, 193
as page, 318
cheerfulness, 328
as poet, 332
married, 452
government of Italy, 492
in Tuscany, 631 f .
in Florence, 639
meets F., 641
enters Florence, 650
death, 673 f.
government of Florence, 679
Frederick, son of Henry VII, grand
son of F., King of Austria and
Syria, 640, 649
Frederick, the Peaceful, grandson of
F., 688
Freedom, Lombard principles of,
442, 494
abhorred, 462 f.
pestilential, 565
conflict of, 610
Freidank, 186, 198
Freising, Bp. of, 620 f.
French, in Syria, 182
language, 324
Revolution, 6x6
v. also France
v. also Napoleon
Friesland, 380
Frisians, 168
Friuli [Friaul], 195
route via, 377, 403
diet, 379 f., 387, 393
Fucine Lake, 450
Fulda, Abt. of, 402, 413
" Fugitives," 650 f.
Fulgentius, 355
Gafita, 55
fortress, 116
harbour, 546
Galeazzo, 647
Galen, 356
Galla Placidia, 373
Gallura, 470
Galvano Lancia, 492, 676
Game-preserving, 358
Garda Lake, 104
Garfagnana, 487, 626, 645
Gascony, 327
Gebhard of Arnstein, 373, 417,
430ff.
Genoa, 25, 56, 105
trading rights, 122 ff.
in Syria, 182
friction with F., 376
alliance with Venice and Pope,
466 f.
and Sardinia, 470
and Gregory's Council, 544 f .
receives Innocent IV, 589
attacked by F.'s fleet, 649
Georgios of Gallipoli, Chartophylax,
306, 521
Gerard of Cremona, 338
Gerard of Malperg, Grandmaster of
the Teutonic Order, 579
Gerbert of Rheims, 335, v* Syl
vester II
German (s) art, 408 f.
bishops, 489, 537, 620 f. ; v. also
Princes
character, 13, 619, 677, 687
chivalry, 409
church, under Innocent IV, 621
reforms, 618 f.
constitution, 109 f., 379 f.
Empire, 384 ff.
hate towards, 13 f., 15 f.
knights, 82 ff., 463, 465, 649
at Cortenuova, 436 f.
in Italy, 660 f.
v. also Teutonic Order
language, 14, 411
legates, 489, 491
music, 332
national feeling, 79 f., 142, 216
precocity, 30
princes, v. Princes
repute, 70
spirit, 79 f., 372
superiority, 12
towns, 95, 373
Germanicus, 355
Gerold, Patriarch of Jerusalem, 170,
182, 188, 197, 205, 389, 390
Gertrude of Austria, 596
Gervase of Tilbury, 39
Gesta Romanorum, 533
Gherardeschi, family, 511
704
INDEX
Ghibellines, 12 footnote, 67 f.
towns and poetry, 331
significance of, 466
and Franciscans, 509
idol worshippers, 534
in Genoa, 545
and Innocent IV, 579
and F., 625 f.
knights of Parma, 643
and Ottaviano, 646 f.
and popular party, 649 f.
Giacomo da Lentini, 333
Giacomino Pugliese, 330 ; v. Jacob
of Morra
Giglio, island of, 549
Giotto, 355
Girgenti, 128
Gnostic philosophy, 355
God, as expounded by Innocent III,
40 ff.
invoked by F., 53, 55, 106, 200 f. ;
v. also Providence
medieval conception of, 230 ff.
F.'s conception of, 238 ff., 251,
348
Chap. IX passim
Godfrey of Bouillon, 167, 202
Godfrey of Hohenburg, 317
Godfrey of Hohenlohe, 401
Godfrey of Morra, 633
Godfrey of St. Omer, 86
Godfrey of Sabina, 575 ; v. Celes-
tine IV
Godfrey of Viterbo, 3, 28
Goethe, 257, 317, 5&*, 687
and Karl August, 329
Golden Horde, 552
Goliard literature, 305
Gomorrha, 312, 408, 593
Gonzaga family, 493
Goths, 219
Gottfried von Strassburg, 81 , 409
Granada, Khalif of, 288
Grand Master of Teutonic Order, v.
Hermann of Salza and Gerard
of Malperg
Gratian, 228
Great Halleluja, 396 f.
Greece, 157
Greek(s), ancient, 149, 226, 290
tyrants of Sicily, 218
medieval, archpriest, 143
language in Sicily, 305 f., 267, 291
troops, 464
v. also Byzantium
Greenland, 361
Gregory of Montelongo, Legate in
Lombardy, 466, 539, 643, 648
Gregory VII, 39> 43, 44* » 497
Gregory IX [Hugo of Ostia], acces
sion, 163
attitude to F., 170 ft.
and fifth Crusade, Chap. IV
a " heretic," 198
jurist, 229
and F.'s law-giving, 261
and Jews, 268
dislike of youth, 308
as arbitrator, 376 f.
as F.'s foe, 388 f.
and Romans, 389 f.
and Lombards, 393 f.
and Henry VII, 402
and Lombard wars, 416 f., 428 f.,
457 ff.
alliance agt. F., 466 f., 475 f.
duel of encyclicals, 495 ff.
war, 537 f.
Council, 543 ff.
death, 559
and St. Francis, 560
contrast with Innocent IV, 579 f.
Grilli family, 545
Grosseto, 631
Grottaf errata, 529, 559
Guarneri, 66 1
Guastalla, 646
Gubbio, 513
Gubernator of Germany, 103, 158
Gudrun, poem, 80
Guelfs, and Ghibellines, 12 footnote,
67 f.
enemies of Empire, 466
and F., 625 f.
take Parma, 643
rising of, 644 ff.
of Florence, 649
banner of, 649
after Parma, 658
Guelfo de Donoratico della Gherard*
esca, 678
Guidi family, 540
Guido of Arezzo, 355
Guido Bonatti, 613, 632
Guido Cavalcanti, 354
Guido Colonna, 333
Guido Guerra, 540
Guido Guinizelli, 331
Guido of Sessa, 613
Guiron de Courtois, 324
INDEX
Guiscard, 218, 291, 443; v, also
Robert Guiscard
Gualdrada, 540
Gundissalinus, Dominicus, 157, 338
Gurither of Rethel, 4
Gunzelin of Wolfenbuttel, 138
Hafsids, 288
Hagenau, 59, 413
F.'s hq., 78, 415
Half the world, ship, 125, 288
Hall, in Swabia, 618
Halleluja, the Great, 396 f.
Hannibal, 427, 559. 574
Hansa, Hanseatic League, 284
Hapsburg, 217, 383 ; v. also Rudolf
of
Haramu'sh Sharif, 187
Harem, 3x0 ff., 334, 343> 4°8, 59^
in Victoria, 657
Hartmann of Aue, 81
Harzburg, 66
Hashish, 193
Hashishin, 193 f.
Hasan -i Sabah, 193
Hawking, in East, 192
F.'s love of, 315 f-, 359 f-
Arab treatise, 542
before Parma, 656
under Manfred, 674
v. also Falcon Book
Hawkwood, John, 661
Hebrew(s), 306
scholars, 343
scriptures, 414
v. also Jews
Hector, 662
Heidelberg, 405
Heilbronn, 306
Helena, wife of Manfred, 675
Heliand, old Saxon poem, 202, 611
Hellespont, 9
Henna, 286
Henricus Abbas, 288
Henry Aristippus, 339
Henry of Avranches, English poet,
306,411,443
Henry Baum of Vienna, 483
Henry of Castile, Senator of Rome,
318, 675 f.
Henry of Cologne, 340
Henry Duke of Liegnitz, 553
Henry the Lion, 65, 67
Henry of Luxemburg, 680
Henry of Malta, Admiral, 125, 129,
136, i?3> 179, 2°5
Henry, Margrave of Meissen, 573,
688
Henry of Morra, Grand Court
Justiciar, 392, 476 f., 632
Henry the Proud, 67
Henry Raspe, Landgrave of Thurin-
gia, 433, 636 f., 641
Henry of Sayn, 401
Henry of Veldeke, 81 , 409
Henry II, Empj., 407
Henry III, King of England, 406,
408, 414, 570 f.
Henry IV of France, 327
Henry VI, Hohenstaufen, Emp., 3,
6 ff., 14,48,88,219,222,388
savagery, n
contrast with brother Philip, 18
and Teutonic Order, 88
and Rome, 100
and royal rights, 112
crusade, 168
and Cyprus, 179
and Constance, 408
and Empire, 442
and fellow kings, 564
buried Palermo, 684
Henry VII, son of F. and Constance
of Aragon, birth, 53
King of Sicily, 55 > 9§
Duke of Swabia, 99
King of the Romans, 100
diet of Cremona, 147, 156 f.
princes and, 177
cheerfulness, 327
diet of Ravenna, 373 f.
summoned, 378 f.
Pope and, 389 f.
fall of, 400 f .
and Lombards, 416, 430
F. mourning for, 447
Henry (secundus), son of F. and
Isabella of England, birth, 456
in Italian govt., 492
King of Viterbo, 639
King of Sicily, 640
death, 673
Herakles Musagetes, 365, 688
Herat, 551
Hercules, 453, 684
pillars of, 9
Heresy, Heretics ;
in Lombardy, 147
Milan forms of, 148, 152
706
INDEX
Heresy, edicts agt., 109, 153
of St. Francis, 161 f.
as treason, 264 ff.
Poor Men of Lyons, 161
Albigensian, 161
of Gregory IX, 198
as (< degenerates," 269
and Gnosticism, 355
and rebels, 392, 481
Heretic Pope, 198, 618
Hermann of Salza, Grand Master of
the Teutonic Order, 90 f., 106
recruits for Crusade, 137
and F.'s Jerusalem marriage, 138
and F.'s illness, 170
in Syria, 179, 182, 187
at Jerusalem, 198, 199
ambassador to Gregory IX, 208,
211
and bureaucracy, 273
diet of Ravenna, 373
and Henry VII, 403
at Rome, 417
at Marburg, 434
illness, 468
death, 473
Hermann, Landgrave of Thuringia,
81
Hermes, 355
Hero of Alexandria, 339
Herod, 546, 593
Heruli, 64
Hibernia, 554
Hildesheirn, Bp. of, 401, 621 ; v.
Conrad of
Hippocrates, 356, 357
Hohenburg family, 317, 491, 660;
•v. also Godfrey of
Margravine of, 317
Hohenlohe brothers, 89 ; v. Conrad
and Godfrey of
Hohenstaufen, achievement, 215 f.
age (art, epics, etc.), 80 ft., 328,
408 f., 526 f .
ambition, 433
characteristics, 18, 30
cheerfulness, 327
glamour of name, 52
hereditary domains, 384, 432, 567
imitators of, 612 f .
Italy and, 639
pride of race, 64, 571
Sicily and, no
stirps caesarea, 572 ff.
theories of Empire, 8, 563 f.
tragedy of, 299, 379, 673 f.
and Welfs, 406
Holy Land, n, 122, 137, 139,
Chap. IV passim, 423, 555
Holy Sepulchre, 198, 423, 501, 524
Holy Writ, v. Bible
Homer, 338
Honorius III, Pope, 96 f., 112, 209,
229
and crusade, 135, 137
correspondence with F., 155 f.
Lombard policy, 1541!,
influence of Hugo of Ostia, 163
death, 163
Horace, 337
Horses, of F., 366, 404, 415, 585
symbolical, 609
sale of, 485
of Mongols, 555
breeding of, 358
healing of, 364
Hostages, 474, 482
from Ravenna, 539
from Italian towns, 542, 625 f.
system of, 652
Household officers [f amiliares] , 17,
23, 4?6 f.
Hubert Pallavicini, Margrave, 492,
548, 614, 649
rules in Lombardy, 639, 680 f.
Hubris, 178, 534, 573
Hugdietrich, 81
Hugh of St. Circq, 330
Hugo Boterius, 579, 644
Hugo, Dean of Capua, 145
Hugo Novellus, 649, 658
Hugo of Ostia, 108, 152, i62-f. ;
v. Gregory IX
Hugo of Payens, 86
Huguccio of Pisa, 8
Hungary, 384, 552
Hunger Tower of Pisa, 678
Hunting books, 362, 363 ; v. also
Falcon Book
Huri(s), 194
Hyginus, 355
Ibelin, v. John of
Ibn Abbad, Amir of Saracens, 128 f.
Ibn Sabin of Ceuta, 348 f.
Icarus, 21
Iceland, 361
Ilsan, 86
Imola, 541
Incubators, 358
INDEX
707
India(n), 288, 344, 349
falcons from, 361
astrologers, 355
numerals, 158
Indian Sea, 354
Indigo, 286
Indulgences, for Crusaders, 168 f.,
556, 621 f.
Innocent III, Pope, 12, 14, 116, 163,
264, 388, 441, 481
Sicilian policy, 16 f.
Deliberatio . . . , 19
F.'s guardian, 22 f., 31 ft.
seeks to pacify Sicily, 32
episcopal elections, 33 f.
power of, 39-46
imperial politics, 46-54
meets F., 56
Lateran Council, 70
death, 71
successor, 96
theories of priesthood, 161, 236 f.
Inquisition, 240
and Melchizedek, 45, 259
and Otto, 537
Innocent IV, Pope, 229, 566, 578 f.
courage, 589
F.Js foe, 581 ft.
flight, 589
as Antichrist, 6x8
and Crusade, 621 f.
and Church patronage, 622 f.
plots agt, F.'s life, 635 f., 666 f.
and Louis of France, 68 1 f.
v. also Sinibaldo Fiesco
Innocentius Papa, 6x8
Innsbruck, 104
Inquisition, 240, 393 f,
in Germany, 400 f., 419
Spanish, 653
Insula Fulcherii, 149, 150
Interamna, 649
Interdicts, 394, 537, 623
Interregnum, 473
Invocation of Emperor, 239 f.
lonians, 385
Ionian Sea, 125
Ippolito Medici, 648
Iraq, 196, 348
Irene, wife of Philip of Swabia, 18
Irnerius, 228
Isabella of Jerusalem, second wife of
F.,139f., 193
Isabella of England, third wife of F.,
406, 492, 639
L.F.S.
Isaiah, 395, 426
Isagoge of Porphyry, 344
Isidore of Seville, 336
Islam, 167, 188, 193, 348
Ismailites, 193
Isola Fulcheria, 149, 150
Italy, under Henry VI, 8-12
re-organised by F., 486 if.
and Hohenstaufen, 639
in chaos, 650 f.
Ivan the Terrible, 608
Ivo of Chartres, 82
Jacob ben Abbamari, 344, 345
Jacob of Aquino, 330
Jacob, Abp. of Capua, 179, 297
Jacob of Caretto, Margrave of
Savona, son-in-law of F., 492,
649
Jacob of Morra, 330, 474
traitor, 632 f., 658
Jacob of Palestrina, Cardinal, 434,
549 > .577 f-
Jacob of San Severino, 114, 117, 141
Jacopo Mostacci, 330
Jacopo Tiepolo, Doge of Venice, 377
Jaffa, 184, 187, 192
Janissaries, 131
Jehovah, 220
Jehuda ben Salomon, 345
Jeremiah, 395
Jerusalem, patriarch of, 71
Isabella of, 139
Knights of, 139
John of, 139
prophecies about, 167
F.'s attitude to, 168
F.'s crusade, Chap. IV passim
F. King of, 390
triumph, 443, 450
coronation, 199, 443
as penal settlement, 481
retaken by Muslims, 557
recovered, 557
taken by Turks, 590
Jesi, birthplace of F., 5
and Bethlehem, 512, 522, 572
Jesus Christ, 500 ; v. Christ
Jews, laws for, 121
status of, 130
Jewish God, 220
toleration of, 267 f.
monopolies, 283
in Sicily, 291
philosophy, 343
708
INDEX
Jews, ritual, 344
converts, 413 f.
Jewish law suit, 268 f., 413 i
Jinns, 606
Jizya, poll tax, 130
Joachim of Flora, 4, 160, 162
and three ages, 335
and Last Day, 395, 506
and Church, 497
Job, 666
Johannes Maurus, 312 f., 673
John of Brienne, titular King of Jeru
salem, 138, 140 f., 155, 311
leading papal troops, 204
sons of, 318
poems of, 329
John of Capua, 304
John of Colonna, Cardinal, 459, 51 1 ,
558, 574 *•
John Hawkwood, 66 1
John Ibelin of Cyprus, 181 , 317, 389
John " Lackland,'* King of England,
49, 50, 68
John of Otranto, 306
John of Palermo, 158, 341
John of Polo, 452
John of Procida, 684
John of Salisbury, 8, 306
John of Trajetto, 145
John Vatatzes, Emp, of Nicaea,
embassy, 207
weakness of, 442
troops, 464
and Venice, 542
and F., 598
financial help, 660
F.'s letters, 306, 627, 682
John of Vicenza, 397 f.
Jordan, Brother, 510
Jordan, Marshal, 66 1 f.
Jordan R., 189, 567
Jordanus Ruff us, 364
Joseph, 524
Juda ben Salomon Cohen, 344
Judas Iscariot, 664
Julian, the Apostate, 593
Julier Pass, 416, 475
Julius Caesar, v. Caesar
Julius II, 441
Jupiter, 21,327, 521
Ammon, 215
planet, 355
statue, 531
Justinian, 222 ff., 228, 263^, 300,
453, 512
Justice, F.'s conception of, 113,
224 ff., Chap. V passim
Justitia, identification with self, 424
on Capuan Gate, 532
High Mass of, 526
as Avenger, 604 f.
for sale, 664 f.
Justiciar(s), 272 ff.
training, 294 rl.
family origins of, 313
and Lombard War, 477 f.
Imperial Grand, 410
Justiciar of Students, 298, 317
Kant, 228
Karakoram, 552
Karl August, 329
Kemp ten, Abt. of, 621
Kerak, Muslim prince of, 557
" Key Soldiers," 177, 204, 207, 679 ;
a. Papal Troops
Khalif(s), 192, 203
Khwammi, Turkish tribe, 590
King Arthur, 409
Kings of Europe, 414, 423 f.
and Lombard War, 462 f.
manifestos to, 496, 504, 542 f.
summoned agt. Mongols, 553 f.
F.'s message, 561-8
attitude of, 568
Klingsor, 21
Knights, parties in towns, 151
Orders of, v. Teutonic Order,
Templars, St. John, Jerusalem
German, v. German knights
Italian, 641
Korah, 595
Kulm, 92
Kunigunde, Empress, -wife of Henry
11,407
Kyffhauser, 688
La Cisa Pass, 509, 641, 645, 679
and Pallavicini, 680
Lambertacci family, 672
Lambro R., 57
Lancelot, 324
Lancia, Margrave, 645, 656
Landolfo Caraccioli, 317, 319
Landpeace, of Mainz, 410 f.
of Esslingen, 553
Landulf of- Aquino, 115
Landulf, Bp. of Worms, 404, 405
La Rochelle, 68
Last Day, v. End of World
INDEX
709
Latin language, 325 f,
style of P.d.V., 300 ff,
Lateran, 40, 174, 399
Lateran Council, 70, 597
Laurin, 80
Lawyers, professional, 132 f., 278 ff.,
293 ff.
Lay culture, 132 ff., 228, 237, 293
v, also University of Naples
Leather coinage, 541
Lebanon, 193
Lecce, County of, 22, 24
Lechfeld, 104, 421, 433
Legates, 489^
Legate General, 490
Legenda Karoli Magni, 167
Legnano, 431
Leo XIII, 668
Leo the Franciscan, 397
Leonardo Fibonacci of Pisa, 157,
340, 341 f.
Leonardo da Vinci, 357
Leopards, 404
Lepers, 420, 614
Lese Majesty, 597, 599
Levant, 122, 377
Lewis, the Bavarian, Emp., 668
Lewis, Duke of Bavaria, 158, 373
Lewis, Landgrave of Thuringia, 168,
169 f., 172
husband of St. Elizabeth, 419
M poisoned " by F., 499
Lex Pompeia, 634
Lex regia, 233, 249, 454
Liber animalium, 340
Liber atiguriorum, 355
Liber Augustalis, 223-227
Gregory and, 261
P.d.V. and, 300
commentators, 305
sacrilege, 308
pages, 315
Emp. as Fate, 400
forbids torture, 652
Liber censuum, 96
Liber introductorius, 342
Liber particulars, 342
Liber perditionis, 355
Liber quadratorum, 342
Liege [Liittich], 374
Liegnitz, battle of, 553
Liguria, 639
Ligurian coast, 487
sea, 122, 546
Lily banner of Guelfs, 649
Limassol, 179
Limburg, Duke of, 170
Limousin, 326
Lipari Is., 354
Liris R., 674
Literature
under Hohenstaufen, 80-82
in Sicily, u 1,324-333
Liutprand of Cremona, 336
Livonia, 91
Livy, 303
Loans, 483 f., 659
Lodi, 53, 279, 459, 460, 484
Logic, 344, 356
Logos, 231
Logothetes
and sacratissimum mysterium, 236
duties of, 299
sounding praise, 524
on Capuan Gate, 527
appointment, 640
fall of, 664
v. also Piero della Vigna
Lombard(s), Lombardy :
and Henry VI, 8
and F. (in 1220), 105
(in 1226), 147-154
factions, 149-154
and Gregory IX, 173-179, 210
administration, 282
stock, 314
diet of Ravenna, 372 f.
war, 416-438, 459 ff.
conception of freedom, 442, 462,
494
Lombard League, renewed, 147 f*
ally of Pope, 153, 159
after F.'s return, 207
F. refuses recognition, 393
and Henry VII, 4°2
first war, 416, 430-438
second, 459 ff.
London, 406, 407
Loreto, 5, 377
Lorraine, Duke of, 59, 77
Lorsch, abbey of, 620
Lotario dei Conti, v. Innocent III
Louis IX, King of France, Saint
Louis, 388, 423
and captured prelates, 549
greatness of, 569 ff.
as peacemaker, 587, 642
and Innocent IV, 591
and sixth Crusade, 622, 663
and Pope, 68 1 f.
INDEX
Louis XIV, King of France, 543
Lower Pavia, 487
Lubeck, 91, 316
Luca Savelli, 399
Lucan, 447
Lucca, 331, 626
Lucera, 130, 190, 267, 310, 358, 418
castle of, 529
loyalty to F.'s house, 676
Lucia Viadagola, 672
Lucifer, 534, 554
Luciferians, 348, 400
Lucretius, 337
Lunigiana, 487, 626, 645
Luther, 606
Lyons, Council of, 497, 592
rendezvous for Crusade, 556
and Innocent IV, 589
as Pope's hq., 623, 626
centre of conspiracy, 635 f.
F.'s projected visit to, 642
and Parma, 648
Macedonians, 217
Machiavelli, 114, 117, 245, 669
Machiavellianism, of F., 113, 245
Magdeburg, 18
architecture, 82, 662
Bp. of, 621
Magic, 248
and God, 238
and precious stones, 354
numbers, 618
in Victoria, 657
ring, 674, 683
Magna Charta, 69, 570
Magnetic needle, 354
Maimonides, 343, 344, 348, 349
Mainz, 63
coronation, 63, 443
diet of, 409
Abp. of, 620
Majestic, the, 668, 687
Malabranca family, 455
Malaspina family, 645
Malik Salih, Sultan, 557
Maliku'l Umara, 388
Malta, 123, 316, 482
Manfred, King of Sicily, natural son
of F. and Bianca Lancia
and Islam, 190
and violation of law, 245
letters, 301
and ex-pages, 317
education, 318
cheerfulness, 327 ff.
poems, 332
and friends, 345
and Falcon Book, 360
relations, 492
the " empire breed," 572
on illegitimate princes, 612
Vicar General of Burgundy, 640 f.
before Parma, 656
and German knights, 66 1 f.
and King Conrad, 673
career, 674 f.
heirs, 675
at F.'s deathbed, 683
buries his father, 684
Manfred Lancia, 492, 639
Manfred Maletta, 332, 674
Manfredonia, Gulf of, 321
Manifestos, F.'s first, 175
Jerusalem, 199 f., 215, 521
Cortenuova, 446, 457
after excommunication, 474, 496 f .
invading Papal States, 512
Mongols, 553 f.
substance of, 561 f.
Reform, 615, 617 f.
style of, 302
Mansurah, 68 1
Mantua, 58
and penance, 398
and Lombard League, 430
surrender, 435
massacre, 626
and Parma, 645, 658
Manuel Comnenus, 649
Marburg, 419, 420, 421
Teutonic knights at, 434
Marcellina , Bp . of Arezzo , 649 , 652 f .
Marco San, 377
Marco Polo, 193, 288
Maremma, the, 631
Margaret of Austria, wife of Henry
VII, 375
Margaret Hohenstauf en, Margravine
of Meissen, dau, of F., 573
de Mari family, 545
Mariner's compass, 354
Marinus of Eboli, 547, 634, 670
Marinus Filangieri, 146
Markets, 285
Markward of Anweiler, 15, 24, 26,
29, 31,48
Marriage Laws, 246, 291
Mars, planet, 355, 654
Marseilles, 129
INDEX
711
Marshals of France, 217, 277, 629
Marshal Jordan, 661 f.
Martianus Capella, 355
Marzukh, 312
Mathematicians, Mathematics, 336,
342,415
Matilda, Margravine of Tuscany,
149
Matildine Inheritance, 47, 149, 470
Matthew Curialis, 279 f.
Matthew Fasanella, 658
Matthew Orsini, Senator of Rome,
574 f., 576
Matthew Paris, 406
Matthew Visconti, 648
Maulbronn, 83
Maundy Thursday, 174, 472, 587
Mausoleum of Augustus, 452, 558
Mechanics, 341, 361
Medici family, 335, 457, 494
Medicine, practice of, 356 f.
Medor, 189
Meissen, Margravine of, 573
Meissner Poet, 677
Meistersang, 333
Meleager, 529
Melchizedek, 45, 259, 551
Melfi, Moors at, 310
Court of Exchequer, 484
Constitutions of, 223 ff., 305, 356
trans, into Greek, 3°6
Menagerie, of F*, 311, 358, 404, 464
in Victoria, 657
Mendicant Orders, 84, 89, 154, 294
satire on, 305
and young nobles, 330
expelled from Sicily, 480
and F.'s reforms, 617
casuistry of, 654
employed agt. F., 621 f.
Meno of Plato, 339
Mephistopheles, 102, 606
Meran, Duke of, 58
Mercaria, fortress of, 430
Mercury, god, 531
quicksilver, 354
Mercenaries, 427, 463, 479, 484
German, 217
knights, 277, 428, 430, 649, 660
archers, 430
cost of, 540
Merlin, 4, 3501 396> 447
Mesopotamia, Sultan of, 184
Messiah, 3, 259
Hebrew hopes of, 344
imminent, 395 f.
reign of peace, 609
Chap. IX passim
Messiah-Emperor, 423, 425, 495,
508, 523 f.
Messina, 12, 34, 51, 55, 124
diet, 121
law courts, 278
rebellion, 280, 320, 391
Moors at, 310
volcanoes, 354
and King Conrad, 673
Metellus, 155
Meyer, Conrad Ferdinand, 298
Michael, archangel, 560
Michael Comnenus, 315
Michael Scot, 158, 323, 339 f.,
344 f., 350 £.,357,586
as scientist, 364
as prophet, 396
Milan, 57, 72> i°5
and Lombard League, 147
hostility to Cremona, 148 f.
focus of heresy, 148, 152
political importance, 197
administration, 282
and Henry VIII, 402
and Alps, 415
F.'s hate, 422
arrogance, 425
campaign agt., 460 ft., 475
and Pallavicini, 614
second campaign agt., 649
Abp. of, 647
Minnesang, Minnesanger, 61, 81,
104, 323, 333
Ministeriales, 373, 374, 401, 661
Minorites, v. Franciscans
Minotaur, 21
Minstrels, laws agt., 121, 329
Mirror of Manners, 344
Miracles, and God, 238, 251
of St. Elizabeth, 419 f.
of Bp. Marcellina, 653
of Michael Scot, 323
Mithra, 234
Modena, 105, 430, 645, 670, 679
Molise, 114 f.
campaign, 116 f.
Monaldo Aquino, as poet, 330
Monarchs, v. Kings
Monarchy, birth of Western, 203
Mondragone, 114
Mongols, 551 ff., 620
Monks, in Germany, 82 fl. ; v. Cister-
712
INDEX
cians, Dominicans, Franciscans,
Mendicant Orders
Monopolies, Jewish, 268 f.
State, 282 f.
corn, 286
money-changing, 484
Monreale, 128
Mons Gebellus, 686
Mont Cenis, 642
Montaperti, 650, 661, 674
Monte Albona, 280
Monte Cassino, 32, 114, 207
school of, 315
fortress, 479
Abt. of, 114
Monte Chiaro fortress, 435
Monte Christo, 549, 626
Monte Gargano, 130
Monte Mario, 107, 108
Montefeltre family, 494
Montefiascone, 13, 514
Montefusculo family, 314
Montenero family, 314
Montepulciano, 353
Montferrat, 324
Margrave of, 61, 309, 460, 649
son of, 671
Montieri silver mines, 659
Moors, in Spain, 86, 167
round F., 310
and negroes, 312 and footnote
Moravia, 553
Morocco, 9, 196, 288
Morra family, 313, 316, 492
as poets, 330
Moselle R., 12
Moses, 344, 349, 4*3, Sob, 524, 609,
665
Moses ben Salomon of Salerno, 345
Mosio fortress, 430
Mosul, 341,350
Motta, 148 and footnote
Muainin, falconer, 363, 364
Muazzin, 190
Mugello, 647
Muhammad, 131 f., 139, 193, 500,
55i,S9S
Muska, 312
Music, 323,327,355
Muslims, Mussulmans : in Sicily, 128
plantation of Lucera, 130 fl., 267
in Syria, Chap. TV passim
holy men, 237
tolerance of, 267
banquet, 388
F.'s attachment, 627 f.
interest in F., 638
Nablus, 183, 184
Naples, fortress, 116
University, 132 fl.
law courts, 278
sea route, 478
relief, 527 f.
bay of, 321
castel nuovo, 530
harbour, 546
Napoleon, mental development, 78
in East, 191
self coronation, 198
and Marshals, 217, 277, 629
wars and finance, 289
and chase, 359
personality, 368
and Caesars, 447
relatives, 493
God of French, 508
and Church, 272, 525
Empire, 488, 543
and priesthood, 567
and Blilcher, 580
last years, 605
and Egypt, 627
Narni, 487, 588
Narses, 219
National self-consciousness
in Germany, 79 f,, 142
in Sicily, 219, 289 ff.
in Europe, 142, 289 ff., 564
in Italy, 325
Nature, feeling for, 364 f.
Natural Law, 250 ff., 364
Natural Science, 336 f,, 363 *•
Naumburg, 81
Navarre, 8
King of, 556
Nazareth, 187, 229
Necessitas, 243 ff.
Neckar R., 404
Negroes, 312 and footnote
Nemesis, 678
Neo-Manichaeism, 348
Neo-Platonism, 254, 337 f.
Nero, 546, 593
Nibelungenlied, 80
Nicaea, 442
Emp. of, 207 ; v. John Vatatzes
Nicastro, 405
Nice, 544
Nicephorus, 336
INDEX
7*3
Nicolas of Ajello Abp. of Salerno,
*45
Nicolas the Peripatetic, 340
Nicolas of Pisa, 535 f.
Nicolas of Rocca, 302
Nicolas Spinoia, Admiral, 545
Nicolas, Abp. of Taranto, 141
Nicolas of Trani, 318
Nicomachaean ethics, 340
Nicosia, 34, 280
Nietzsche, 357, 387> 603
Nigidius-, 355
Nile R., 136, 173
Nimrod, 593
Niobe, 678
JNisfu'd Dunya, ship, 125, a88
Nola, 145
Normandy, Normans ; 8, 9, no
sack of Amain, X22
and Saracens, 128
kings of Sicily, 218, 219* ^22, 290
and French language, 325
and falconers, 363
v. also Roger II and William II
North Albingia, 158
North Pole, 361
North Sea, 412
Norway, 354, 36*, 554
Notaries, 278 fl.» 295 rj.
Notker, trans, of Vergil, 81
Novara, 460, 541
" Nous," 334
Numbers, prophetic, 618
Indian numerals, 158
Nuremberg, 52, 53, 78, 9*
Occursius, 327
Ode of Montbeliard, Constable of
Syria, 182
Odysseus, 337
Oglio R., 435 f-
Ogotai, 553
Old Man of the Mountain, 193, 388
Olmiitz, Bp. of, 621
Optics, 339, 356
" Oracles " of F., 219
Ordeal, trial by, 410
Orfinus of Lodi, poet, 448
Orlando di Rossi, v. Bernardo
Orleans, 82
Ornithology, 360
Orosius, 218
Orsini, 455
Colonna feud, 576
Orta, 514
Ortnit, 81, 139, 189
Osimo, 649, 652
Osmanli Sultans, 131
Ostriches, 358
Otranto, 170, 171
castle of, 479
Ottaviano degli Ubaldini, Cardinal,
646 f., 658
and Foggia, 674
Otto of Brunswick-Luneburg, 412
Otto of St. Nicolas, Cardinal, 577,
586
Otto Visconti, 647
Otto, Palgrave of Witteisbach, 35,
46, 133
Otto I, Emp., 330
Otto II, Emp., 336
Otto III, Emp., 149, a*6
and Constantine, 335, 44*
Otto IV, Emp., Duke of Brunswick,
12, 17, 18, 46 ff., 58 ff., 122,
145, ^77
and England, 68
death, 77
coronation in Rome, 109
and Innocent III, 537
Ottos, the, 296,451
Ottocar II of Bohemia, 573
Ovid, 307, 337
translated, 81
Ovindoli, 116
Paderborn, Bp. of, 621
Padua, Giotto's paintings, 355
and penance, 398
Lombard war, 430 f-
capture, 432
winter quarters, 470 f.
and Eccelino, 612
Paestum, 634
Pages at F.'s court, 314 ff.
Palamedes of Guiron de Courtois,
324
Palermo, Henry VI enters, 6, 219
Norman capital, 9, 2!, 325
F.'s home, 13, 22, 27-29, 48, no
coronation, 15, 443
taken by Markward, 24
wedding, 34
F.'s hq., 51,52,53,55
and Genoa, 123
import duties, 127
massacre of Muslims, 128
Sicilian Vespers, 292
sugar, 286
INDEX
Palermo, court at, 320
centre of culture, 339
tomb of Constance, 529
tomb of F., 684
Palestine, 557 ; v. also Syria, Jeru
salem, etc.
as penal resort, 481
Pallavicini, v. Hubert
Pandulf of Fasanella, 631 f,, 658
Papa angelicas, 560, 604
Papal States, u. Patrimonium
Papal troops, 177, 204, 207, 298,
634, 679
Papal vacancy, 560 f.
Paquera, 399
Paradise, 193, 259, 309, 347, 351 , 614
Paris, 39, 82
Parma, loyalty, 151
defeat at, 359, 362, 366
and penance, 396
troops, 430
F.podesta, 471,474
and Pallavicini, 614
and Orlando di Rossi, 628
and Tebaldo Francisco, 632
and conspiracy, 633 f.
F. visits, 641
taken by Guelfs, 643 f.
siege, 654 ft.
retribution, 680
Pasiphae, 21
Parzival, 16
poem, 81, 189
Passau Confederation, 619 f.
Bp. of, 621
Passes, v. Alpine Passes and La Cisa
Passports in Sicily, 479
Patarenes [" Sufferers "], 270
Patrimonium Petri [States of the
Church; Papal States], 8, 47,
130, .486 ff., 509 ff., 513, 536,
558 ff., 561,578, 583,588,591
coveted by Roman plebs, 389
Pax et Justitia, 224 ff.
Paul of Baghdad, 613
Paulus Traversarius, podesta of
Ravenna, 474, 482, 539
Pavia, 57, 151
diet, 460
and Pallavicini, 614
F. visits, 642
levies, 644
and Conradin, 675
v. Upper Pavia and Lower Pavia
Peacocks, 358
Pelicans, 358
Pellegrino, 27
Penance movement, 396 f.
Percival Doria, 332, 492
Perduellio, 266
Peronnus, Master, 145
Persia(n), 189
astrologers, 355
Perugia, 71, 154
Peter, Apostle, 40, 45, 304, 524
festival of chair, 40, 516
Peter II of Aragon, 31
Peter Capoccio, Cardinal, 679
Peter Capuanus of Amalfi, 288
Peter of Eboli, 3, ix
Peter of Ga£ta, Admiral, 68 1
Peter of Ireland, 298, 345, 347
Peter Murrone, v. Celestine V
Peter, Bp, of Ravello, 297
Peter the Spaniard, 341
Peter of Verona, the Martyr, 397,
653
Pfaffers, Advocate of, 58
Phaedo of Plato, 338,339
Pharaoh, 560, 665
Pha/salia, 202
Pharisees, 505
Philip II, Augustus of France, 8, 49,
50, 52, 54, 63, 68
Philip of Swabia, King of the
Romans, 12, 13, 17 f.t 24
murdered, 35
buried, 78
Phoenicians, 128
Phoenix, 362
Physicians, 357
Physiognomy, 357
Physiologus, 336
Piacenza, 57
knights of, 151
administration, 282
penance, 397
diet, 423
P. d. V.'s address, 426
lost to F., 431
defies F., 461
war agt., 475
alliance with Pope, 475
and Pallavicini, 614, 68 1
refuge of Guelfs, 643
and Parma, 645
Piedmont, 460, 486, 663
Pied Piper of Hamelin, 397
Piero della Vigna, Petrus de Vinea :
discovered, 144
INDEX
Piero della Vigna, career, 144, 298 ff.
F. and Reason, 257
and Naples Univ., 898 f.
and poets, 330
as poet, 332
sweetmeats, 341
as arbiter, 346
as ambassador, 392
to England, 406
at Rome, 417
address at Piacenza, 426
victory manifesto, 446
relation to F., 447
on Cortenuova, 450
speech in Padua, 472 f.
proclaims ban, 474
and Sicilian Chancery, 477 f,
quotes scripture, 495
as priest, 513
and F. cult, 523 f.
bust of, 532, 669
outside Rome, 559
ambassador to Pope, 579, 583
in the field, 585
peace ceremony, 587
to Parma, 628
F.'s letter, 629
Logothetes, 640
Italian knights, 641
as Judas, 664 f.
and finance, 679
Pietro Asinelli, 672, 677
Pietro Ruifo, 683
•Pietro Tiepolo, son of Doge of
Venice, podesta of Milan, 437 f .
prisoner, 467
hanged, 542
Pilgrims, assembling for F.'s Cru
sade, i68fT.
for St. Louis's Crusade, 557, 68 1
plunder of returning, 1 5
tax on, 485
Piombino, 548
Pilate, 505
11 Pious," the, 197
Pirates, Dalmatian, 388, 542
Piuma2zo, 474
Pisa, Pisans : in Sicily, 25, 56, 123,
206, 546
and Kaiser Otto, 48
trading rights in Sicily, 122
fleet, 52
in Syria, 182
and poetry, 331
and Sardinia, 470
sea route, 478
factions, 511
baptistery, 535
art, 535
and F., 626
and Conradin, 675
hunger tower, 678
troops, 157
Pistoia, 535, 641
Plague, at Brindisi, 169
of caterpillars, 286
cattle, 465
Great Plague, 688
Planetarium, 195, 388
Planets, 355
Plantagenets , 406
Plato, on Tyrants, 117
search for Dikaiosyne, 255
and Arabs, 338 f.
ibn Sabin and, 349
Meno, Phaedo, 339
Timaeus, Phaedo, Republic, 338
Players, laws agt., 121
Plebs rise in Italian towns, 151 fl.
Pliny, 336, 337, 362
Plotinus, 255
Pneumatica of Hero of Alexandria,
339
Po R., 57, H9» 435, 460, 475, 645 f.,
655, 658, 670
Podesta, judges and, 295
elections of, 376
papal, 417
Piacenza, 434
Mantua, 435
Milan, 437
Florence, 460, 628, 632, 649, 680
Genoa, 467
Parma, 471, 632, 643
Treviso, 474
Ravenna, 474, 482
F. as, 490, 492, 493
Fae"nza, 547
Siena, 628
and clergy, 653
Poetry, in Sicily, 328 f.
under Hohenstaufen, 80 f.
Poggibonsi, 652
Poisoning, 666
Poitou, 68
Poland, 8, 552
Polar bear, 196, 358
Poli family, 452, 455
Police, 277
Polis of Greeks, 149, 226
7i6
INDEX
Politics of Aristotle, 341
Pompey, 447
Pontevico, 435
Pontoglio, 436
Pontremoli, 641, 645, 658
" Poor Men of Lyons," 161
Poor Henry, poem, 81
Popular party, 151
Pordenone, 379
Porphyry, 344
Porta Collina, 107
Pozzuoli, 170, 315, 353
Praefectus Urbi, 107
Prag, Bp. of, 621
Prato, 548, 650
Precious stones, 354, 541, 647
Pre"montr6, Abt. of, 549
Prester John, 197, 323, 354* 55*,
683
Primeval Matter, 348
Primeval Speech, 352 f.
Primo popolo, 649
Prince of Peace, 224, 504, 511, 514
Princeps, 215, 233,454
Princes of Germany, and F.'s
minority, 18
choice of F., 52 f.
elect F. Emp., 63
confirm Bull of Eger, 70
F.'s policy towards, 78 f.
selfishness of, 103
relation to Emp., 109
meet F. in Italy, 158
on Crusade, 168
loyalty to F., 177, 537 f.
diet of Friuli, 195
mediators with Pope, 208
diet of Ravenna, 372
and King Henry, 374
and Lombards, 375, 437
at Aquileia, 378
rdle in Constitution, 397 !.
at Mainz, 409 f.
and Gregory IX, 418 f.
diet of Vienna, 432
spiritual, 501
diet of Verona, 596
and Church reforms, 619
cease to visit Italy, 660
Principato, the, 279, 285
Privilege of Worms, 374, 379, 381
Privileges, Law of, 114 f., 121, 124,
126, 145, 147
Problemata, 341
Proclus, 339
Prophecies, F.'s birth, 3 f.
Emp. of West, 167 f.
Arab, 197
End of World, 224 ff., 395
Merlin, 4, 350
Abt. Joachim, 4, 160, 335, 395
Michael Scot, 396
O.T., 395
Messiah, 551
Messiah-Emperor, 423
Vergilian, 3, 524, 685
of F.'s death, 641
of F.'s return, 685 f.
v. also Sibyls
Proserpine, 21
Prosody in Sicily, 333
Protestantism, 270
Proteus, 599
Protonotary, 664
Provencal, language, 330
poetry, 324, 330, 332
Provence, 122, 161, 325, 344
singers of, 326
knights, 391
Providence, Divine, and F., 53, 106,
206, 217, 251, 258 ff., 442, 443
and kings, 243
creation, 258
and Sicily, 290
and astrology, 342
Prussia(n), 91-94, 158, 385
state, 273
Pseudo- Aristotle, 337 f.
Ptolemy, 339, 344
Puer Apuliae, Chap. II passim, 179,
194, 262, 324, 403, 409, 469,
550, 675, 684
Purgatory, 351
Purpose in Nature, 347
Qazi, 190
Quicksilver, 354
Quedlinburg, 68
Qur'an, 194
Rainer of Manente, 1 1 1
Rainer of Palermo, 331
Rainer of Viterbo, Cardinal
584 f., 591
pamphlets, 592 f., 609
and conspiracy, 634 f.
and Bp. Marcellina, 653
Ranke, 360
INDEX
Raphael, painter, 5
Ratisbon [Regensburg] , 63, 403
Bp. of, 620
Ravello, 535
Ravenna, 174, 282
diet, 372-376
secession, 474
capture, 539, 541
surrender, 658
retaken, 679
battle of, poem, 80
Re Federigo, 332
Re Giovanni, v. John of Brienne
Reason, Providence as, 252
Mother of all Law, 253 f .
inherent in Justice, 257
not all-sufficient, 262
all-powerful, 448
Rectors of Lombard League, 156
Recuperations, 47, 138, 140, 153
Redondesco fortress, 435
Reform Manifesto(s) , 615, 617 f.
Reformation, 270, 617
and indulgences, 622
and Innocent IV., 624
F. and, 688
Reggio, 430, 626,631, 645
Regensburg, v. Ratisbon
Reginald of Aquino, 330, 331, 333
Reginald Abp. of Dassel, 133, 299
Reginald of Monterero, 331
Reginald of Palermo, 331
Reginald of Urslingen, Duke of
Spoleto, Regent of Sicily, 176,
204, 206
Reichenau, 621
Abt. of, 59
Renaissance, and antique, 225
and justice, 228
and secular learning, 229
and secular state, 239
princes, 245
Sicily and, 254
Christian and Pagan, 303
and Greek, 305
art patronage, 329
astrology, 343
dawn of, 346
astronomy, 355
and Caesar, 446
concentration of, 488
signers, 492
tyrants, 494, 669
art, 535, 548
conflict, 611
materialism, 614
and Innocent IV., 624
German contribution, 66 1 f.
Reno Valley, 641
Renovatio imperil, 425, 441, 443,
454, 4^9
Republic of Plato, 338
Resurrection, 352
Reval, 204
Revelation of St. John, 395
Rex Clericorum, 637
Rex Versuum, 324
Rhine R., 59, 404, 620, 642
Abps., 620 f., 68 1
Rhodes, 179
Richard of Ajello, 114, 145
Richard, Count of Caserta, son-in-
law of F., 317, 492, 585
and conspiracy, 632
counsellor, 640
letter to, 664
at F.'s death-bed, 683
Richard, Coeur de Lion, 8, 65, 1 88,
189
Richard of Celano, 114
Richard, Chamberlain, 179, 481
Richard of Cornwall, 323, 557 f., 570,
687
Richard of Fasanella, 633
Richard (primus), Filangieri, 146,
176, 179, 182, 389
Richard (secundus), Filangieri, 318,
557
Richard of Montenero, 640, 683
Richard of San Bonifacio, 435
Richard of San Germane, 305
Richard of Theate, natural son of F.,
492, 639, 649, 658
death, 669 f.
Richard of Venusia, 305
Rieti, 174, 399, 559
Rimini, 403, 541
Golden Bull, 92, 94, 158
Rispampani, 399
Ritual murder, 268, 413 f.
Rivotorto, 47
Robert of Artois, 543
Robert of Castiglione, 649
Robert of Fasanella, 633
Robert Guiscard, 9, 218, 442
Robert of Somercote, Cardinal, 575
Rocca d'Arce, 116
Rocca d'Evandro, 114
Rocca Mandolfi, 116
Rocca San Felice, 405
7i8
INDEX
RofTredo of Benevento, 105, 134,
175, 228, 231
Professor at Naples, 298
High Court Judge, 302
reads F.'s manifesto, 451
Roger de Amicis, 331, 477, 557
traitor, 633
Roger of Aquila, 114, 116, 117, 141
Roger Bacon, 364
Roger II, King of Sicily, 4, 9
treasure of, 21
statesmanship, no
Assize Collection, 229
law-giver, 236
and silk, 283
buried Palermo, 684
Romagna, 474
Vicariate, 487
Rome, Romans : under Henry VI, 8
reception of F. , 55 f .
Coronation visit, 106 ff.
asylum for Sicilian exiles, 141
famine, 158
eject Gregory IX, 174
craving freedom, 389
F.Js wooing of, 425 f., 433, 451 f.
caput mundi, 443 f.
F. playing Caesar to, 438, 441 ff.
F.'s exhortations to, 514 f.
and Conradin, 675
and Hohenstaufen, 676
Ancient Rome, 56, 115, 216, 233
fame of, 425 f.
Roman culture, 79 ff.
Roman Equestrian Order, 442, 453
Roman Law, and Hohenstaufen, 81,
109
Justinian, 223
Barbarossa, 109, 228, 451
and Christ, 230
priest and judge, 237
ratio , 253
and heretics, 264
perpetua infamia, 276
and Medieval Romans, 442
and Emp. of Peace, 444
in F.'s Italy, 489
Roman Senate, 442, 449, 453
Roman Senator(s)
at Coronation, 107
pro-Kaiser, 452 f.
Matthew Orsini, 574 f .
and provisional peace, 587
Romanus of Porto, Cardinal, 575,
577
Romulus, 514
" blood of R," 455, 489, 676
Rose Garden of Worms, 80, 86
Rosetta, 288
Rudolf of Hapsburg, Count, 59
King of the Romans, 77, 404, 410,
558
and Anjou, 677
RufB family, 314, 331
Russia, 415, 552
St. Andre'a Island, 169
St. Agatha, 21
St. Ambrose, 647
St. Anthony of Padua, 394, 396
St. Augustine, 228, 243
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, 71, 83,
86 f., 167, 260
St. Dominic, 394, 396
St. Elisha, 373
St. Elizabeth, 168, 419 f.
St. Francis of Assisi, 47, 71
in Egypt, 98
preaching, 154
and F., 160 ff.
and Gregory IX, 170, 560
sufferer, 202 f.
teachings, 239, 256
and prayer, 260
poetry, 326
as disciple, 335
nature lover, 364 f.
canonised, 394
fulfils prophecy, 396
and St. Elizabeth, 419
frugality, 497
poverty, 505
and successor, 509
painting, 536
antithesis of F., 239, 6u, 615 f.
as reformer, 616
St. Gall, 58
Abt. of, 58 f., 621
St. George, 661
St. Gothard Pass, 415, 475
St. Hedwig, 553
St. Helena, 627
St. John, Knights of, 182, 207, 557
St. Louis, v. Louis IX
St. Lucy, feast of, 683
St. Mark of Venice, 377
St. Maurice tomb, 108
St. Peter's, 107 f., 169, 515
St. Rosa, 653
INDEX
719
St. Thomas of Aquino, v. Thomas
Aquinas
St. Victor's, 654
Sakhrah mosque, 191
Sala, 634
Saladin, Sultan, 168, 183. 187, 189,
191
Salerno, 140, 145, 279, 315, 468, 634
Salians, the, 296, 451
Salimbene of Parma, v. Fra Salim-
bene
Salinguerra, 432, 613
Sallust, 628
Salpi, 476
Salt, monopoly, 283
water, 353
Saluzzo, 324
Salzburg, Abp. of, 620 f.
Samnites, 115
San Angelo, 675
San Bonifacio, 431
San Domenico, 678
San Germano, 32, 187, 147, 171,
207, 227
San Gimignano, 652
San Giorgio, 662
San Marco, 377
San Miniato, 549, 641, 667
San Severino, Counts of, 633
San Zeno, monks of, 470
Sancha of Aragon, 31, 32
Sancho II of Portugal, 571
Santa Justina, 470
Santa Maria in Turribus, 107
Santa Maria Transpadina, 108
Sappho, 306
Saracens in East, v. Chap. IV passim,
389, 470. Also Al Kamil,
Fakhru'd Din, Saladin
Saracens in Sicily, trumpeters, 6
island, 25 ff., 51, 117
war, 127, 128 f.
bodyguard, 131, 288, 404, 651
women, 310, 311
dancing girls, 323
eunuchs, 310 f., 407, 655, 657
augurs, 4x5
troops, 463
executioners, 652 f.
loyalty to F.'s house, 676
v, also Lucera
Saragossa, 34
Sarai, 552
Sardinia, 122, 470
Sarno, 145
Satan, 348, 611, Chap. IX passim;
v. also Luciferians
Saul, 433
Savanarola, 398
Savona, 460, 681
Savoy, 460
count of, v. Thomas
Saxons, 216 f., 385
Scala family, 494
Scholasticism, Scholastic Philo
sophy : 247, 252, 335 f., 351,
356, 362
Scholia of Germanicus, 355
Scipio(s), 223, 628
Scotland, 554
Sculpture, 530 f . ; v. also Art, Sicilian
Art, German Art, Renaissance
Art
Sea powers, 121 f., 127
Sea waters, 353
Secretum secretorum, 341
Selvaggia, natural dau. of F., m.
Eccelino, 471
'Semprebene of Bologna, 332
Senate, Senator : v. Roman Senate
Sep timer Pass, 416, 475
Septizonium of Septimius Severus,
452, 575
Seraph, 199, 202, 203
Serfs, Saracen, 128, 130
Jew, 268 f.
Serio R., 149
Shamsu'd Din, Qazi, 190
Sheep-farming, 286
Shihabu'd Din, 356
Sibyls, Sibylline sayings: 4, 167,
259, 339, 396, 447> 573, 685,
686
Sicily, Sicilian(s) : v. also Table of
Contents and Maps inside back
cover
conquest by Henry VI, 6, 9
chaos, 25, no
re-organisation, 110-135, 221 f.
" mother of tyrants," 218
and Lombard War, 476 ff.
art, 526 f.
barons, 25, 48, 111 ff.
bureaucracy, 133, 272 ff., 293 ff.,
477 ff.
chivalry, 314, 320, 323 ff., 334
church, 17, 33, 142 f.
Ceperano, 209 f., 280
after excommunication, 480 fl.
constitution, 282 ff.
720
INDEX
currency, 17 and footnote, 127,
225 f., 484, 541,6545., 659
education, 132 ff,
fleet, 124 f-
laws, 121, 124, 223 ff.
literature, 324
national Defence, 119 f.
national Feeling, 219, 289 ff.
romance, 20 f., 219
temperament, 218 ff.
towns, 280
trade, 121 f, 125, 127, 283, 285;
v. also Monopolies
volcanoes, 354
Sidon, 187
Sidrach, 350
Siege, technique, 427, 654
of Brescia, 464 f.
of Ravenna, 539
of Faenza, 539 f.
of Viterbo, 585
of Parma, 654 ff.
cost of, 540 f .
Siege of Parma, poem, 306
Siena, 152
poetry, 331
art, 535
and Orlando di Rossi, 628
F. visits, 641
popular party, 649
Como hostages, 652
money-lending, 659
and Conradin, 675
Sigfrid II, Abp. of Mainz, 73
Sigfrid III, Abp- of Mainz, Regent
of Germany, 433, 620, 636
the King-maker, 638
Signor(s),492ff.
Sigilgaita, 535
Sigismondo Malatesta, 612
Silesia, 552
Silk monopoly, 283
Silver mines, 659
Simon of Tournai, 500
Simon ides, 502
Sinibaldo Fiesco, Count of Lavagna,
474, 578, 628 ; v. Innocent IV
Slave markets, 129
Slaves, 310
Smoke, volcanic, 354
Sodom, 408
Sodomy, 312, 540
" Soldiers of the Keys," 177, 204,
206 f. ; t;. Papal Troops
Solms, Count of, 401
Solomon, 413
temple of, 187, 609
Soncino, 436
Sonnet, 333
Sora, 51, 115, 116
razed, 207
Sorella, 116
Sorcery, 338 ff., 354
Spain, Spaniards : 132, 157, 168,
196
as market, 288
spirit of, 341
falcons, 361
horses, 415
and Romans, 426
Gregory's council, 544 f .
Bps., 597
Spello, 634
Speyer, 78, 433
Spherics of Alpetragius, 339
Spinola family, 545
Spoleto, 8,47, 138, 153,486
Vicariate General, 487
hostages, 652
Duchess of, 6
v. also Patrimonium
Spolia opima, 448
Springs, 353
Squillace, Bp, of, 141
States of the Church, v. Patrimon
ium
Stirps regia, 64 f., 572
Strasburg, 677
Bp. of, 59
Stromboli, 354
Stupor mundi, 356
Style, of Capuan school, 302
of Papal chancery, 302
ofP.d.V., 300 ff.
of Falcon Book, 362
Styria [Steiermark] , 384, 403
Suessa, 114
" Sufferers," Paterenes, 270
Sugar cane, 286
Surgery, 356
Susa, Marriage Feast of, 197
Suspects, 277 f., 481, 625
Sutri, 514,515, 589
Swabia, 385, 404
F.'s rights in, 415
v. Philip of
Swabians, 216 f.
Sylvester II, Gerbert of Rheims, 335
Symbols, Symbolism ;
of world sovereignty, 51
INDEX
721
oriental, 192
number, 355
Empire, 429
of Rome, 516
coins, 226, 529
on Capuan Gate, 533
macrocosm, 561
F.'s horses, 609
horns, 609
F.'s tomb, 684 f.
Synod, v. Church Council
Syntax of Ptolemy, 339
Syracuse, 128 L, 380, 476
rebellion, 280
Syria, 157, Chap. IV passim, 348
Christian factions, 389
Tacitus, 149
Tagliacoxzo, 676
Talmud, 414
Tancred, King of Normans in
Sicily, 22, 24
as Crusader, 167
Taormina, 21
Tar an to, 22, 24
Bp. of, 141
Taren, gold coin, 17 and footnote
Taro K., 645
Tartars, 55* f-
manifesto, 553 f.
Tartarus, 554 , J 0
Taxation, Taxes : F.'s methods, 287
arrears, 484
on pilgrims, 485
advance, 541
after Parma, 659
Teano, 114
Tebaldo Francisco, podesta of Par
ma, 632, 634 f.
Templars, 86 fl.
glory of, 88
and F. in Syria, 182
treachery, 189
F.'s retaliation, 205, 207
untrustworthiness, 557
Terence, 337
Termola, 541
Terni, 559> 5.88
Terra Laboris, 115,220
F.'s love of, 321
Terracina, 140
Terragium, 13°
Terrible, the, 668, 687
Terrisius of Atina, 298, 305
Tertullian, 266
Teucer of Babylon, 355
Teutonic Order, 88 ff., 116
in Prussia, 158, 273
in Syria, 182
in Sicily, 206
and Hansa, 284
burial, St. Elizabeth, 420
and Lombards, 434
Thaddeus of Suessa, 295, 346, 470
and Sicilian Chancery, 477 *•
bust of, 532
ambassador to Pope, 579, 583* 587
advocate at Lyons, 596 f.
slain, 656
loss to F., 669
Thebes, 283
Theodore, Master, Court Philo
sopher, 158, 341 f., 357, 363
Tunis, 287
trans., 542
Theodoric, 447
Theodosius II., 373
Theophrastus, 344
Thessalonica, 9
Thomas Aquinas, Dominican [St.
Thomas of Aquino], 297, 298,
313
education, 315, 33°
Thomas of Aquino, the Elder, Count
of Acerra, 115, 116
Regent of Syria, 168, i79> 183,
185, 206,372
Captain of Sicily, 376
ambassador to Pope, 470, 476
Thomas of Aquino, the Younger,
son-in-law to F., 317, 49^
counsellor, 640
death, 676
Thomas a Becket, 298
Thomas of Capua, Cardinal, 114
Thomas of Celano, Duke of Molise,
114, n6f., 141
Thomas of Celano, Franciscan, 117
Thomas of Gaeta, 117
Thomas of Montenero, 279
Thomas of Savoy, 492, 639, 642 f.,
680
Three Ages of Joachim of Flora,
395 f .
Three Deceivers, 500 f., 515
Three Kings of East, 72
Thuringia, Margrave, t>. Lewis
Margravine, v. St. Elizabeth
Tiber R., 9, 544
Tiberius, 225
722
INDEX
Tiburtine Sibyl, 4, 686
Timaeus of Plato, 338
Tiraz, 283
Titus, arch of, 452
Tivoli, 514, 559
Toledo, 167
school of, 338
Topica of Aristotle, 339
Torre, 470
Totem, 226
Tolerance of F., 190 f., 267 f.
Tortona, 434
and Pallavicini, 614
Torture, of Sicilian traitors, n
by Eccelino, 613
of Alberigo of Romano, 613
forbidden by Liber Augustalis,
652
wholesale, 652, 654
Pallavicini, 680
Totila, King of Goths, 313
Toul, 63
Toulouse, Count of, 585, 587
Tower of London , 407
Tower of Pisa, 678
Town(s) built by F., Flagella, 281
Aquila, 281
Augusta, 280, 654
Lucera, 130
Victoria, 654, 680
Town planning, 654 f .
Trade, foreign, 122 ff,
regulation of, 282 ff.
agreements, 287 ff. ; v.also Mono
polies
war-time measures, 484 ff.
Traina, 280
Trajan, 223
Translations, Ovid, 81
Vergil, 8 1
from Arabic, 338 f.
of Falcon Book, 363
from Persian, 363
Trani, 104, 283
castle, 479, 558
Transubstantiation, 43
Trapani, 124
Trent [Trient], 58, 104, 156, 157
Bp. of, 621
Treviso, 388
and penance, 398
and Lombard War, 430
captured, 432
fall of, 474
the Devil of, 612 f.
Tribonian, 300
Trient, v, Trent
Trifels, 21, 405
Trinacria, 328
Tripoli, 9, 288
Tristan, poem, 81, 324
Triumph, in Jerusalem, 199, 443,
45°
at Cremona, 437 f.
of Bologna, 671
Trojans, Troy : 64, 433
Troubadour(s), 209, 324, 334, 404
Tullii, 454
Tunis, 128
slave market, 129
famine, 286, 484
trade with, 287 f.
intellectual intercourse, 350
and Venice, 542
Turin, diet, 460, 486
F. at, 597, 642
taken, 649
Tuscan Alps ; v. La Cisa Pass
Tuscany, 8, 9, 50
culture, 314
conquered, 460
Vicariate General, 487, 488, 492
levies from, 541
King of, 640
Tuscany, Papal, 399, 487, 514, 584 ;
v. Patrimonium
Twins, constellation, 343
Two^luminary-theory, of Empire
and Papacy, 271, 502, 562
Two-sword-theory, of Empire and
Papacy, 392 f.
Tyrol, 379
Tyrrhenian Sea, 125, 554
tJberlingen, 58
Uberti family, 650 ; v. also Hubert
Pallavicini
Udine, 379
Ugolino della Gherardesca, 678
'UlamS, 237
Ulm, 78
Ulrich of Kiburg, 59
Ultima Thule, 64
'Umar, mosque of, 187, 190, 192
Unicorn, 336
University of Naples, 132 flL, 228,
237, 893 ff., 297 ff., 301, 305,
3i8, 345
charter, 346
closed to rebels, 480
INDEX
723
Upper Pavia, 486, 488, 492, 547
Urbino, 668
Uri, 415
Usury, 268, 496
Utrecht, Bp. of, 621
Uzzah, 146, 595
Uzziah, 595
Vacancy of Papal Chair, 560 f.
Valetti imperatoris, 314 ; v. Pages
Valois, the, 569
Vasari, 535
Vasto, 541
Vatatzes, v. John
Vaucouleurs, 63
Vegetius, 337
Veitshdchheim, 637
Venice, trading with Sicily, 122, 126,
485
trade with Cremona, 149
route via, 158, 373
and Lombardy, 430, 432, 434
alliance with Genoa and Pope,
466 f.
and Bologna, 474
with Piacenza and Milan, 475
and F.'s sea routes, 541 f.
Venus genetrix, 215
Vercelli, 460, 541
and Pallavicini, 614
and Montferrat, 649
joins F., 659
diet, 663
Vergil, 3
and Dante, 259, 335
as magician, 20, 337
and Augustus, 447
herald of an era, 611
Vernacular speech, 324 ff.
for Sicilian poetry, 329 f., 633
for German laws, 411
Veroli, 137
Verona, 58, 104, 156, 377
and passes, 388, 393
and Pope, 394, 417
road, 430
and Lombard War, 474
diet, 588, 591, 596, 660
and Eccelino, 612
and Conradin, 675
Versiglia, 487
Vespers, Sicilian, 292, 675, 677, 684
Vesuvius, 354
Veterinary science, 363 f.
Via Appia, 530
Via Flaminia, 106
Via Triumphalis, 107
Vicars (General), Vicariates : 486 f.,
492
Emp. and his, 629 f.
training for, 295
type of nominee, 313
Vicenza, 366
Lombard War, 430
capture of, 431
and Eccelino, 612
Victoria town, 654 f., 680
Victorines, coins, 654 f.
Vienna, 317, 433
diet, 432
loans from, 484
and Mongols, 553
Vigevano, 460
Villard de Honnecourt, 311
Virgin Birth, 500
Visconti family, 493, 494, 511
Viterbo, 352, 389, 399
joins F., 514
baths of, 559
defection, 584 f.
skirmish agt., 592
reconciliation, 639
and St. Rosa, 653
Vivarium, 358
Volcanoes, 353
Volga R., 552
Voltaire, 307
Volterra, 659
Vulcan, 21
Waiblings, 12 and footnote
regia stirps, 64, 412, 572
fate of, 66
end of Welf-Waibling feud, 412
Waldemar, King of Denmark, 91
Wales, 554
Walter of Ascoli, 298
Walter of Brienne, 22, 24 f.
Walter of Manupello, 640
Walter of Ocra, 296
Walter of Palear , Bp . of Troia, Chan
cellor of Sicily, 15, 17, 23 f.,
26, 29
deposed, 50
Bp. of Catania, 136, 141
Walther von der Vogelweide, 8, 18,
54, 81, 103
his fief, 104, 409
War, art of, 277, 427
Wartburg, 419
724
INDEX
Wazir of al Kamil, 186
Weights and Measures, 285
Weimar, 360
Weingarten, 65
Weissenburg, Abt. of, 621
Welfs, 12 and footnote
fate of, 66, 412
protege's of Gregory IX, 177
and Hohenstaufen, 406
end of Waibling feud, 412
Werner of Urslingen, 661
West Lombardy, 486
Westminster, 407
Wetterau, 620
Whores, laws about, 121
William Capparone, 24
William Franciscus (primus), F. s
tutor, 26, 28
William Franciscus (secundus), Sici
lian official, 633
William of Holland, 638, 681, 687
William Porcus, Admiral, 124
William II, Norman King of Sicily,
112
Wimpfen, 404
Wind currents, 353
Windsor, 414
Witchcraft, 354
Woden, 687
World, End of, v. End of World
Worms, 10, 78
diet, 374
Privilege of, 374 f-> 379, 381
court at, 404 f., 443
F.'s wedding, 407 f.
mourns Conradin, 677
Bp, of, 402, 621
Wurzburg, 78, 637, 653
Bp. of, 402
Yato, 128, 129
Yemen, 196, 348
Zacharias, King of Sicilian Saracens,
Qrtnit, 139, 189
Zahringen, 77
Zara, 542
Zero, 158
Zeus, 306
Zoological garden, in Byzantium, 336
in Sicily, 358 f.
Zoology, 336, 360
continued from front flap
ft*
style and scholarship. From the reviews
of the English edition: "A first-rate book
on a remarkable man. The narrative runs
to 700 pages, but Frederick's career was
so dramatic and surprising that the story
never flags/' — Jhe Spectator,
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ernst Kantorowlcz is an American his
torian born !n Germany In 1895. He
received his doctorate of philosophy from
the University of Heidelberg in 1921,
He was a member of the history faculty
of the University of Frankfort and of
New College, Oxford University before
coming to the United States during the
3Q's. In this country he taught at Johns
Hopkins University and at the Univer
sity of California, where he was Profes
sor of Medieval History. Since 1951 he
has been a member of the faculty of the
Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton,
Professor Kantorowicz' special interest
in medieval history had wide scope in
his distinguished biography of Frederick
II, an outstanding work that received
highest critical praise upon its publica
tion in Germany in 1927, matched by
Its reception in English translation.
Jacket design fry Brands ftdte
FREDERICK UNGAR PUBLISHING CO.
Ui £«st 23fd Street, New Jork to, SV. y.
100352